Novel Aspects on Insulin Resistance: A Quick Overview

Whole-body insulin sensitivity rather than body-mass-index determines fasting and post-glucose-load growth hormone concentrations

Background

Obese, non-acromegalic persons show lower growth hormone (GH) concentrations at fasting and reduced GH nadir during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). However, this finding has never been studied with regard to whole-body insulin-sensitivity as a possible regulator.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, non-acromegalic (NonACRO, n = 161) and acromegalic (ACRO, n = 35), non-diabetic subjects were subdivided into insulin-sensitive (IS) and –resistant (IR) groups according to the Clamp-like Index (CLIX)-threshold of 5 mg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹ from the OGTT.

Results

Non-acromegalic IS (CLIX: 8.8±0.4 mg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹) persons with similar age and sex distribution, but lower (p<0.001) body-mass-index (BMI = 25±0 kg/m², 84% females, 56±1 years) had 59% and 70%, respectively, higher (p<0.03) fasting GH and OGTT GH area under the curve concentrations than IR (CLIX: 3.5±0.1 mg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹, p<0.001) subjects (BMI = 29±1 kg/m², 73% females, 58±1 years). When comparing on average overweight non-acromegalic IS and IR with similar anthropometry (IS: BMI: 27±0 kg/m², 82% females, 58±2 years; IR: BMI: 27±0 kg/m², 71% females, 60±1 years), but different CLIX (IS: 8.7±0.9 vs. IR: 3.8±0.1 mg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹, p<0.001), the results remained almost the same. In addition, when adjusted for OGTT-mediated glucose rise, GH fall was less pronounced in IR. In contrast, in acromegalic subjects, no difference was found between IS and IR patients with regard to fasting and post-glucose-load GH concentrations.

Conclusions

Circulating GH concentrations at fasting and during the OGTT are lower in non-acromegalic insulin-resistant subjects. This study seems the first to demonstrate that insulin sensitivity rather than body-mass modulates fasting and post-glucose-load GH concentrations in non-diabetic non–acromegalic subjects.

Adequately adapted insulin secretion and decreased hepatic insulin extraction cause elevated insulin concentrations in insulin resistant non-diabetic adrenal incidentaloma patients

Background

Insulin-resistance is commonly found in adrenal incidentaloma (AI) patients. However, little is known about beta-cell secretion in AI, because comparisons are difficult, since beta–cell-function varies with altered insulin-sensitivity.

Objectives

To retrospectively analyze beta–cell function in non-diabetic AI, compared to healthy controls (CON).

Methods

AI (n=217, 34%males, 57±1years, body-mass-index:27.7±0.3kg/m²) and CON [n=25, 32%males, 56±1years, 26.7±0.8kg/m²] with comparable anthropometry (p≥0.31) underwent oral-glucose-tolerance-tests (OGTTs) with glucose, insulin, and C–peptide measurements. 1mg-dexamethasone-suppression-tests were performed in AI. AI were divided according to post–dexamethasone-suppression–test cortisol-thresholds of 1.8 and 5µg/dL into 3subgroups: pDexa<1.8µg/dL, pDexa1.8-5µg/dL and pDexa>5µg/dL. Using mathematical modeling, whole-body insulin-sensitivity [Clamp-like-Index (CLIX)], insulinogenic Index, Disposition Index, Adaptation Index, and hepatic insulin extraction were calculated.

Results

CLIX was lower in AI combined (4.9±0.2mg·kg^-1·min^-1), pDexa<1.8µg/dL (4.9±0.3) and pDexa1.8-5µg/dL (4.7±0.3, p<0.04 vs.CON:6.7±0.4). Insulinogenic and Disposition Indexes were 35%–97% higher in AI and each subgroup (p<0.008 vs.CON), whereas C–peptide–derived Adaptation Index, compensating for insulin-resistance, was comparable between AI, subgroups, and CON. Mathematical estimation of insulin–derived (insulinogenic and Disposition) Indexes from associations to insulin-sensitivity in CON revealed that AI-subgroups had ~19%-32% higher insulin-secretion than expectable. These insulin-secretion-index differences negatively (r=-0.45, p<0.001) correlated with hepatic insulin extraction, which was 13-16% lower in AI and subgroups (p<0.003 vs.CON).

Conclusions

AI-patients show insulin-resistance, but adequately adapted insulin secretion with higher insulin concentrations during an OGTT, because of decreased hepatic insulin extraction; this finding affects all AI-patients, regardless of dexamethasone-suppression-test outcome.

Glucose absorption in gestational diabetes mellitus during an oral glucose tolerance test

OBJECTIVE

Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) show reduced insulin sensitivity and markedly elevated glucose excursions. After delivery, GDM mostly reverts to normal glucose tolerance (NGT), although leaving an increased risk of type 2 diabetes. Because gastrointestinal function changes during pregnancy causing vomiting, constipation, or reduced motility, we thought that gut glucose absorption in GDM or pregnancy might be altered to affect circulating glucose excursions.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

By undergoing 180-min oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs), pregnant women with GDM (GDMpreg; n=15, BMI=32±2 kg/m2, aged 33±1 years) were compared with NGT women (NGTpreg; n=7, BMI=28±1 kg/m2, aged 34±2 years), matching for major anthropometric characteristics (each P>0.2). After delivery (6-7 months later), both groups were studied the same way. We computed and mathematically modeled gut glucose absorption from insulin-mediated glucose disappearance and endogenous glucose production (EGP). Whole-body insulin sensitivity was calculated using the Clamp-like Index.

RESULTS

GDMpreg showed 16-25% higher plasma glucose concentrations (P<0.04) during the final 2 h of OGTT, similar EGP, but lower (P<0.01) insulin sensitivity (2.7±0.2 mg·kg(-1)·min(-1) vs. NGTpreg: 4.5±0.8 mg·kg(-1)·min(-1)). In GDMpreg, gut glucose absorption rates were ≤52% lower from 30 to 120 min (P<0.03 vs. conditions after delivery or NGTpreg). In contrast, glucose absorption rates in NGTpreg were comparable during and after pregnancy. None of the studied women developed diabetes after delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

In GDMpreg, OGTT gut glucose absorption is markedly lower during hyperglycemia, whereas both glycemia and glucose absorption in NGTpreg are comparable between pregnant and postpartum states. Thus, hyperglycemia in GDM does not seem to result from too rapid or increased glucose absorption.

Mechanism and effects of glucose absorption during an oral glucose tolerance test among females and males

BACKGROUND

Several epidemiological studies revealed sex-specific differences during oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs), such as higher prevalence of glucose intolerance (i.e. increased glucose at the end of the OGTT) in females, which was not yet explained. Thus, we aimed to analyze sex-related distinctions on OGTT glucose metabolism, including gut absorption, in healthy humans.

METHODS

Females (n = 48) and males (n = 26) with comparable age (females, 45 ± 1 yr; males, 44 ± 2 yr) and body mass index (both, 25 ± 1 kg/m(2)) but different height (females, 166 ± 1 cm; males, 180 ± 2 cm; P < 0.000001), all normally glucose tolerant, as tested by frequently sampled, 3-h (75-g) OGTTs, underwent hyperinsulinemic [40 mU/(min · m(2))] isoglycemic clamp tests with simultaneous measurement of endogenous glucose (d-[6,6-(2)H(2)]glucose) production (EGP). EGP and glucose disappearance during OGTT were calculated from logarithmic relationships with clamp test insulin concentrations. After reliable model validation by double-tracer technique (r = 0.732; P < 0.007), we calculated and modeled gut glucose absorption (ABS).

RESULTS

Females showed lower (P < 0.05) fasting EGP [1.4 ± 0.1 mg/(kg · min)] than males [1.7 ± 0.1 mg/(kg · min)] but comparable whole-body insulin sensitivity in clamp tests [females, 8.1 ± 0.4 mg/(kg · min); males, 8.3 ± 0.6 mg/(kg · min)]. Plasma glucose OGTT concentrations were higher (P < 0.04) from 30-40 min in males but from 120-180 min in females. Glucose absorption rates were 21-46% increased in the initial 40 min in males but in females by 27-40% in the third hour (P < 0.05). Gut glucose half-life was markedly higher in females (79 ± 2 min) than in males (65 ± 3 min, P < 0.0001) and negatively related to body height (r = -0.481; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study in healthy, glucose-tolerant humans shows for the first time different ABS rates during OGTT in women and men and a negative relationship between body height and gut glucose half-life. Prolonged ABS in females might therefore contribute to higher plasma glucose concentrations at the end of OGTT.

Insulin infusion during normoglycemia modulates insulin secretion according to whole-body insulin sensitivity

OBJECTIVE

Glucose is the major stimulus for insulin release. Time course and amount of insulin secreted after glycemic stimulus are different between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients and healthy subjects. In rodents, it was demonstrated that insulin can modulate its own release. Previous studies in humans yielded contrasting results: Insulin was shown to have an enhancing effect, no effect, or a suppressive effect on its own secretion. Thus, we aimed to evaluate short-term effects of human insulin infusion on insulin secretion during normoglycemia in healthy humans and T2DM subjects of both sex.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Hyperinsulinemic-isoglycemic clamps with whole-body insulin-sensitivity (M) and C-peptide measurements for insulin secretion modeling were performed in 65 insulin-sensitive (IS) subjects (45 ± 1 year, BMI: 24.8 ± 0.5 kg/m(2)), 17 insulin-resistant (IR) subjects (46 ± 2 years, 28.1 ± 1.3 kg/m(2)), and 20 T2DM patients (56 ± 2 years, 28.0 ± 0.8 kg/m(2); HbA(1c) = 6.7 ± 0.1%).

RESULTS

IS subjects (M = 8.8 ± 0.3 mg · min(-1) · kg(-1)) had higher (P < 0.00001) whole-body insulin sensitivity than IR subjects (M = 4.0 ± 0.2) and T2DM patients (M = 4.3 ± 0.5). Insulin secretion profiles during clamp were different (P < 0.00001) among the groups, increasing in IS subjects (slope: 0.56 ± 0.11 pmol/min(2)) but declining in IR (-0.41 ± 0.14) and T2DM (-0.87 ± 0.12, P < 0.00002 IR and T2DM vs. IS) subjects. Insulin secretion changes during clamp directly correlated with M (r = 0.6, P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin release during normoglycemia can be modulated by exogenous insulin infusion and directly depends on whole-body insulin sensitivity. Thus, in highly sensitive subjects, insulin increases its own secretion. On the other hand, a suppressive effect of insulin on its own secretion occurs in IR and T2DM subjects.