1
|
Fassio A, Andreola S, Gatti D, Pollastri F, Gatti M, Fabbrini P, Gambaro G, Ferraro PM, Caletti C, Rossini M, Viapiana O, Bixio R, Adami G. Long-Term Bone Mineral Density Changes in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated with Denosumab: A Retrospective Study with Nonequivalent Control Group. Calcif Tissue Int 2024; 115:23-30. [PMID: 38730099 PMCID: PMC11153264 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-024-01218-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
Data on the effectiveness of denosumab on osteoporosis after kidney transplantation are limited. We investigated the long-term bone mineral density (BMD) changes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) treated with denosumab compared to untreated KTRs. We enrolled KTRs treated with denosumab 60 mg/6 months for 4 years. An untreated group of sex and age-matched KTRs with a 1:1 ratio was included. The primary outcome was BMD changes assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry over 4 years. Data on serum creatinine, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), parathyroid hormone, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D were collected. All patients received oral cholecalciferol and calcium supplementation. 23 denosumab-treated KTRs were enrolled, and 23 untreated KTRs. The median time from transplant to the start of denosumab was 4 years (range 0:24). The denosumab group showed a significant increase from baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine (LS) (9.0 ± 10.7%, p < 0.001), and total hip (TH) (3.8 ± 7.9%, p = 0.041). The untreated group showed a significant decrease at all sites (- 3.0 ± 7%, p = 0.041 at the LS; - 6.3 ± 9.2%, p = 0.003 at the TH; - 6.7 ± 9.3%, p = 0.003 at the FN). The between-group differences in percent BMD changes were statistically significant at all sites. Similar results were found for the respective Z-scores. The ALP serum levels significantly decreased from baseline only in the denosumab group, with a significant between-group difference (p = 0.032). No significant differences in serum creatinine, hypocalcaemic events or acute graft rejection rates were observed. Four years of denosumab therapy were associated with increased BMD in KTRs, while untreated KTRs showed significant BMD losses at all sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Fassio
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
- Rheumatology Unit, Policlinico GB Rossi, 37134, Verona, Italy.
| | | | - Davide Gatti
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Gatti
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Ospedale Bassini, ASST Nord Milano-Cinisello Balsamo, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Fabbrini
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Ospedale Bassini, ASST Nord Milano-Cinisello Balsamo, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Torregrosa JV, Bover J, Rodríguez Portillo M, González Parra E, Dolores Arenas M, Caravaca F, González Casaus ML, Martín-Malo A, Navarro-González JF, Lorenzo V, Molina P, Rodríguez M, Cannata Andia J. Recommendations of the Spanish Society of Nephrology for the management of mineral and bone metabolism disorders in patients with chronic kidney disease: 2021 (SEN-MM). Nefrologia 2023; 43 Suppl 1:1-36. [PMID: 37202281 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2023.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 05/20/2023] Open
Abstract
As in 2011, when the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN) published the Spanish adaptation to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) universal Guideline on Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD), this document contains an update and an adaptation of the 2017 KDIGO guidelines to our setting. In this field, as in many other areas of nephrology, it has been impossible to irrefutably answer many questions, which remain pending. However, there is no doubt that the close relationship between the CKD-MBD/cardiovascular disease/morbidity and mortality complex and new randomised clinical trials in some areas and the development of new drugs have yielded significant advances in this field and created the need for this update. We would therefore highlight the slight divergences that we propose in the ideal objectives for biochemical abnormalities in the CKD-MBD complex compared to the KDIGO suggestions (for example, in relation to parathyroid hormone or phosphate), the role of native vitamin D and analogues in the control of secondary hyperparathyroidism and the contribution of new phosphate binders and calcimimetics. Attention should also be drawn to the adoption of important new developments in the diagnosis of bone abnormalities in patients with kidney disease and to the need to be more proactive in treating them. In any event, the current speed at which innovations are taking place, while perhaps slower than we might like, globally drives the need for more frequent updates (for example, through Nefrología al día).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jordi Bover
- Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tsai TY, You ZH, Tsai SF, Wu MJ, Yu TM, Chuang YW, Lin YC, Deng YL, Hsu CY, Chen CH. Adverse Effects of Denosumab in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A 20-Year Retrospective Single-Center Observation Study in Central Taiwan. Transplant Proc 2023:S0041-1345(23)00145-8. [PMID: 37055293 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bone loss can be noted in kidney transplantation recipients (KTRs) and can be related to fracture events. Denosumab, a potent monoclonal antibody to RANK ligand, increases lumbar bone mineral density. However, safety data for denosumab remain limited regarding transplant recipients. Hypocalcemia and increased genital tract infections have been mentioned as adverse effects in KTRs after being prescribed denosumab. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records of KTRs during the recent 20 years who had been prescribed antiresorptive therapy and were >18 years old. Medical records and their clinical data were reviewed and analyzed. We compared the frequency of adverse effects between denosumab with other antiresorptive therapies. RESULTS A total of 70 KTRs were enrolled, with 46 patients being given denosumab and the first injection being noted on October 31, 2014. No significant differences were seen in mortality rate, opportunistic infection, pneumonia, or genitourinary tract infection. One diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the jaw was noted in the denosumab group (2.2%). A higher incidence of hypocalcemia (<8.4 mg/dL) was noted in the denosumab group (34.8%), and a higher but nonsignificant difference in the incidence of severe hypocalcemia was also noted in the group. CONCLUSIONS Denosumab may be considered as safe as other antiresorptive therapies for KTRs. However, more hypocalcemia events have been noted, so medical personnel may need to be cautious when prescribing its use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsung-Yin Tsai
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital Chiayi Branch, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Zi-Hong You
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital Chiayi Branch, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Shang-Feng Tsai
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Ju Wu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Tung-Min Yu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Wen Chuang
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Chieh Lin
- Department of Urology, Hsinchu Branch, MacKay Memorial Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Lian Deng
- Department of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chiann-Yi Hsu
- Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Hsu Chen
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Life Science, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bioactivity, Molecular Mechanism, and Targeted Delivery of Flavonoids for Bone Loss. Nutrients 2023; 15:nu15040919. [PMID: 36839278 PMCID: PMC9960663 DOI: 10.3390/nu15040919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Skeletal disabilities are a prominent burden on the present population with an increasing life span. Advances in osteopathy have provided various medical support for bone-related diseases, including pharmacological and prosthesis interventions. However, therapeutics and post-surgery complications are often reported due to side effects associated with modern-day therapies. Thus, therapies utilizing natural means with fewer toxic or other side effects are the key to acceptable interventions. Flavonoids constitute a class of bioactive compounds found in dietary supplements, and their pharmacological attributes have been well appreciated. Recently, flavonoids' role is gaining renowned interest for its effect on bone remodeling. A wide range of flavonoids has been found to play a pivotal role in the major bone signaling pathways, such as wingless-related integration site (Wnt)/β-catenin, bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)/transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), etc. However, the reduced bioavailability and the absorption of flavonoids are the major limitations inhibiting their use against bone-related complications. Recent utilization of nanotechnological approaches and other delivery methods (biomaterial scaffolds, micelles) to target and control release can enhance the absorption and bioavailability of flavonoids. Thus, we have tried to recapitulate the understanding of the role of flavonoids in regulating signaling mechanisms affecting bone remodeling and various delivery methods utilized to enhance their therapeutical potential in treating bone loss.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abdalbary M, Sobh M, Elnagar S, Elhadedy MA, Elshabrawy N, Abdelsalam M, Asadipooya K, Sabry A, Halawa A, El-Husseini A. Management of osteoporosis in patients with chronic kidney disease. Osteoporos Int 2022; 33:2259-2274. [PMID: 35748896 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-022-06462-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Patients with CKD have a 4-fivefold higher rate of fractures. The incidence of fractures increases with deterioration of kidney function. The process of skeletal changes in CKD patients is characterized by compromised bone strength because of deterioration of bone quantity and/or quality. The fractures lead to a deleterious effect on the quality of life and higher mortality in patients with CKD. The pathogenesis of bone loss and fracture is complex and multi-factorial. Renal osteodystrophy, uremic milieu, drugs, and systemic diseases that lead to renal failure all contribute to bone damage in CKD patients. There is no consensus on the optimal diagnostic method of compromised bone assessment in patients with CKD. Bone quantity and mass can be assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Bone quality on the other side can be assessed by non-invasive methods such as trabecular bone score (TBS), high-resolution bone imaging methods, and invasive bone biopsy. Bone turnover markers can reflect bone remodeling, but some of them are retained by kidneys. Understanding the mechanism of bone loss is pivotal in preventing fracture in patients with CKD. Several non-pharmacological and therapeutic interventions have been reported to improve bone health. Controlling laboratory abnormalities of CKD-MBD is crucial. Anti-resorptive therapies are effective in improving BMD and reducing fracture risk, but there are uncertainties about safety and efficacy especially in advanced CKD patients. Accepting the prevalent of low bone turnover in patients with advanced CKD, the osteo-anabolics are possibly promising. Parathyroidectomy should be considered a last resort for intractable cases of renal hyperparathyroidism. There is a wide unacceptable gap in osteoporosis management in patients with CKD. This article is focusing on the updated management of CKD-MBD and osteoporosis in CKD patients. Chronic kidney disease deteriorates bone quality and quantity. The mechanism of bone loss mainly determines pharmacological treatment. DXA and QCT provide information about bone quantity, but assessing bone quality, by TBS, high-resolution bone imaging, invasive bone biopsy, and bone turnover markers, can guide us about the mechanism of bone loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Abdalbary
- Mansoura Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
- Division of Nephrology, Bone and Mineral Metabolism, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose Street, Room MN-560, Lexington, KY, 40536-0298, USA
| | - M Sobh
- Mansoura Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - S Elnagar
- Mansoura Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - M A Elhadedy
- Nephrology and Transplantation Unit, Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - N Elshabrawy
- Mansoura Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - M Abdelsalam
- Mansoura Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - K Asadipooya
- Division of Endocrinology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA
| | - A Sabry
- Mansoura Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - A Halawa
- Sheffield Teaching Hospital, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - A El-Husseini
- Division of Nephrology, Bone and Mineral Metabolism, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose Street, Room MN-560, Lexington, KY, 40536-0298, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ren B, Ren X, Wang L, Tu C, Zhang W, Liu Z, Qi L, Wan L, Pang K, Tao C, Li Z. A bibliometric research based on hotspots and frontier trends of denosumab. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:929223. [PMID: 36199692 PMCID: PMC9527327 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.929223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets and inhibits the osteoclast activating factor receptor activator for nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL). It has been widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis, giant cell tumors of bone, and in the prevention of malignant skeletal-related events (SREs). We collected the research results and related MeSH terms of denosumab from 2011 to 2021 through the Web of Science and PubMed, respectively. The literature was visualized and analyzed by CiteSpace and bibliometric online analysis platforms. The MeSH terms were biclustered using the Bibliographic Co-Occurrence Analysis System (BICOMB) and graph clustering toolkit (gCLUTO). The results show that the number of denosumab-related annual publications had increased from 51 to 215, with the United States leading and Amgen Inc. being the most influential in the past 10 years. Articles published in the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research had the highest total citations. Three scholars from Shinshu University in Matsumoto, Yukio Nakamura, Takako Suzuki, and Hiroyuki Kato, joined the field relatively late but produced the most. The clinical comparison and combination of denosumab with other drugs in the treatment of osteoporosis was the most significant focus of research. Drug withdrawal rebound and management strategies have gained more attention and controversy recently. MeSH analysis revealed eight major categories of research hotspots. Among them, exploring the multiple roles of the RANK-RANKL-OPG system in tumor progression, metastasis, and other diseases is the potential direction of future mechanism research. It is a valuable surgical topic to optimize the perioperative drug administration strategy for internal spinal fixation and orthopedic prosthesis implantation. Taken together, the advantages of denosumab were broad and cost-effective. However, there were still problems such as osteonecrosis of the jaw, severe hypocalcemia, a high recurrence rate of giant cells in the treatment of bone and individual sarcoidosis, and atypical femoral fractures, which need to be adequately solved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bolin Ren
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Tumor Models and Individualized Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiaolei Ren
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Tumor Models and Individualized Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Lu Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Chao Tu
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Tumor Models and Individualized Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Wenchao Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Tumor Models and Individualized Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhongyue Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Tumor Models and Individualized Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Lin Qi
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Tumor Models and Individualized Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Lu Wan
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Tumor Models and Individualized Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Ke Pang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Tumor Models and Individualized Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Cheng Tao
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- *Correspondence: Cheng Tao, ; Zhihong Li,
| | - Zhihong Li
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Tumor Models and Individualized Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- *Correspondence: Cheng Tao, ; Zhihong Li,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Denosumab treatment for osteopenia or osteoporosis in heart transplant recipients: Effects and safety. TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tpr.2022.100103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
|
8
|
Lavainne F, Guillot P, Figueres L. Troubles minéraux et osseux dans la maladie rénale chronique : physiopathologie, conséquences et prise en charge. Rev Med Interne 2022; 43:225-232. [DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2022.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
9
|
Kim B, Cho YJ, Lim W. Osteoporosis therapies and their mechanisms of action (Review). Exp Ther Med 2021; 22:1379. [PMID: 34650627 PMCID: PMC8506919 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.10815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a common disease that affects millions of patients worldwide and is most common in menopausal women. The main characteristics of osteoporosis are low bone density and increased risk of fractures due to deterioration of the bone architecture. Osteoporosis is a chronic disease that is difficult to treat; thus, investigations into novel effective therapeutic methods are required. A number of studies have focused on determining the most effective treatment options for this disease. There are several treatment options for osteoporosis that differ depending on the characteristics of the disease, and these include both well-established and newly developed drugs. The present review focuses on the various drugs available for osteoporosis, the associated mechanisms of action and the methods of administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beomchang Kim
- Laboratory of Orthopaedic Research, School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Jin Cho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea
| | - Wonbong Lim
- Laboratory of Orthopaedic Research, School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea.,Department of Premedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Suárez Fernández ML, Ridao Cano N, Álvarez Santamarta L, Gago Fraile M, Blake O, Díaz Corte C. A Current Review of the Etiology, Clinical Features, and Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection in Renal Transplant Patients. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11081456. [PMID: 34441390 PMCID: PMC8392421 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Urinary tract infection (UTI) represents the most common infection after kidney transplantation and remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant (KT) recipients, with a potential impact on graft survival. UTIs after KT are usually caused by Gram-negative microorganisms. Other pathogens which are uncommon in the general population should be considered in KT patients, especially BK virus since an early diagnosis is necessary to improve the prognosis. UTIs following kidney transplantation are classified into acute simple cystitis, acute pyelonephritis/complicated UTI, and recurrent UTI, due to their different clinical presentation, prognosis, and management. Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) represents a frequent finding after kidney transplantation, but ASB is considered to be a separate entity apart from UTI since it is not necessarily a disease state. In fact, current guidelines do not recommend routine screening and treatment of ASB in KT patients, since a beneficial effect has not been shown. Harmful effects such as the development of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria and a higher incidence of Clostridium difficile diarrhea have been associated with the antibiotic treatment of ASB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Luisa Suárez Fernández
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain; (N.R.C.); (L.Á.S.); (M.G.F.); (C.D.C.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Natalia Ridao Cano
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain; (N.R.C.); (L.Á.S.); (M.G.F.); (C.D.C.)
| | - Lucia Álvarez Santamarta
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain; (N.R.C.); (L.Á.S.); (M.G.F.); (C.D.C.)
| | - María Gago Fraile
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain; (N.R.C.); (L.Á.S.); (M.G.F.); (C.D.C.)
| | | | - Carmen Díaz Corte
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain; (N.R.C.); (L.Á.S.); (M.G.F.); (C.D.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gopaul A, Kanagalingam T, Thain J, Khan T, Cowan A, Sultan N, Clemens KK. Denosumab in chronic kidney disease: a narrative review of treatment efficacy and safety. Arch Osteoporos 2021; 16:116. [PMID: 34319515 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-021-00971-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk of bone fractures. In this review, we summarize the complexity of fracture prevention in CKD, describe the usefulness of a medication called denosumab, and review its safety in this population. Our article will help doctors manage brittle bones in CKD and encourage researchers to conduct more studies to improve bone health in CKD. PURPOSE Patients with CKD are at increased risk of fragility fractures and associated consequences. We discuss the complexity of fracture prevention in CKD, summarize the efficacy and safety of denosumab, and provide an approach to denosumab-induced hypocalcemia. METHODS Using predefined terms, we searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar for studies on fracture prevention in CKD and the efficacy and safety of denosumab. We included observational studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, evidence-based reviews, and clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS The diagnosis of osteoporosis and prevention of related fragility fractures is complex in CKD, particularly in those with advanced and end-staged kidney disease (ESKD). Prior to initiating denosumab, it is important to assess for and optimize CKD-mineral and bone disorders (CKD-MBD). In observational studies and small RCTs, denosumab has been shown to improve bone mineral density and reduce bone turnover in CKD, but there have been no studies focused upon its fracture efficacy. Denosumab-induced hypocalcemia has also been reported, which disproportionately impacts those with ESKD. Risk factors for hypocalcemia with denosumab use in CKD include lower baseline serum calcium and 25 hydroxyvitamin D and both low and high bone turnover. Choosing the "right patient" for denosumab, supplementing with calcium and vitamin D, adjusting calcium dialysate, and close clinical monitoring are essential if considering this drug. CONCLUSION With optimization of CKD-MBD, calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and close monitoring, denosumab can be considered in CKD. There are however opportunities to better understand its fracture efficacy and safety in an RCT setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aquila Gopaul
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Tharsan Kanagalingam
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jenny Thain
- Division of Geriatrics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Tayyab Khan
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea Cowan
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Nabil Sultan
- Division of Nephrology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Kristin K Clemens
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Western University, London, ON, Canada. .,St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, ON, Canada. .,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada. .,Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada. .,ICES, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alfieri C, Binda V, Malvica S, Cresseri D, Campise M, Gandolfo MT, Regalia A, Mattinzoli D, Armelloni S, Favi E, Molinari P, Messa P. Bone Effect and Safety of One-Year Denosumab Therapy in a Cohort of Renal Transplanted Patients: An Observational Monocentric Study. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10091989. [PMID: 34066345 PMCID: PMC8124304 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10091989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
In 32-kidney transplanted patients (KTxps), the safety and the effects on BMD and mineral metabolism (MM) of one-year treatment with denosumab (DB) were studied. Femoral and vertebral BMD and T-score, FRAX score and vertebral fractures (sVF) before (T0) and after 12 months (T12) of treatment were measured. MM, renal parameters, hypocalcemic episodes (HpCa), urinary tract infections (UTI), major graft and KTxps outcomes were monitored. The cohort was composed mainly of females, n = 21. We had 29 KTxps on steroid therapy and 22 KTxps on vitamin D supplementation. At T0, 25 and 7 KTxps had femoral osteoporosis (F-OPS) and osteopenia (F-OPS), respectively. Twenty-three and six KTxps had vertebral osteoporosis (V-OPS) and osteopenia (V-OPS), respectively. Seventeen KTxps had sVF. At T12, T-score increased at femoral and vertebral sites (p = 0.05, p = 0.008). The prevalence of F-OPS and V-OPS reduced from 78% to 69% and from 72% to 50%, respectively. Twenty-five KTxps ameliorated FRAX score and two KTxps had novel sVF. At T12, a slight reduction of Ca was present, without HpCa. Four KTxps had UTI. No graft rejections, loss of graft or deaths were reported. Our preliminary results show a good efficacy and safety of DB in KTxps. Longer and randomized studies involving more KTxps might elucidate the possible primary role of DB in the treatment of bone disorders in KTxps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Alfieri
- Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (V.B.); (S.M.); (D.C.); (M.C.); (M.T.G.); (A.R.); (D.M.); (S.A.); (P.M.); (P.M.)
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Correspondence: or ; Tel.: +39-02-55034552; Fax: +39-02-55034550
| | - Valentina Binda
- Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (V.B.); (S.M.); (D.C.); (M.C.); (M.T.G.); (A.R.); (D.M.); (S.A.); (P.M.); (P.M.)
| | - Silvia Malvica
- Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (V.B.); (S.M.); (D.C.); (M.C.); (M.T.G.); (A.R.); (D.M.); (S.A.); (P.M.); (P.M.)
- Specialization School of Nephrology and Dialysis, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Donata Cresseri
- Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (V.B.); (S.M.); (D.C.); (M.C.); (M.T.G.); (A.R.); (D.M.); (S.A.); (P.M.); (P.M.)
| | - Mariarosaria Campise
- Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (V.B.); (S.M.); (D.C.); (M.C.); (M.T.G.); (A.R.); (D.M.); (S.A.); (P.M.); (P.M.)
| | - Maria Teresa Gandolfo
- Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (V.B.); (S.M.); (D.C.); (M.C.); (M.T.G.); (A.R.); (D.M.); (S.A.); (P.M.); (P.M.)
| | - Anna Regalia
- Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (V.B.); (S.M.); (D.C.); (M.C.); (M.T.G.); (A.R.); (D.M.); (S.A.); (P.M.); (P.M.)
| | - Deborah Mattinzoli
- Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (V.B.); (S.M.); (D.C.); (M.C.); (M.T.G.); (A.R.); (D.M.); (S.A.); (P.M.); (P.M.)
| | - Silvia Armelloni
- Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (V.B.); (S.M.); (D.C.); (M.C.); (M.T.G.); (A.R.); (D.M.); (S.A.); (P.M.); (P.M.)
| | - Evaldo Favi
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Renal Transplantation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Molinari
- Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (V.B.); (S.M.); (D.C.); (M.C.); (M.T.G.); (A.R.); (D.M.); (S.A.); (P.M.); (P.M.)
- Specialization School of Nephrology and Dialysis, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Piergiorgio Messa
- Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (V.B.); (S.M.); (D.C.); (M.C.); (M.T.G.); (A.R.); (D.M.); (S.A.); (P.M.); (P.M.)
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Torregrosa JV, Ferreira AC, Cucchiari D, Ferreira A. Bone Mineral Disease After Kidney Transplantation. Calcif Tissue Int 2021; 108:551-560. [PMID: 33765230 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-021-00837-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD) after kidney transplantation is a mix of pre-existing disorders and new alterations. The final consequences are reflected fundamentally as abnormal mineral metabolism (hypercalcemia, hypophosphatemia) and bone alterations [high or low bone turnover disease (as fibrous osteitis or adynamic bone disease), an eventual compromise of bone mineralization, decrease bone mineral density and bone fractures]. The major cause of post-transplantation hypercalcemia is the persistence of severe secondary hyperparathyroidism, and treatment options include calcimimetics or parathyroidectomy. On turn, hypophosphatemia is caused by both the persistence of high blood levels of PTH and/or high blood levels of FGF23, with its correction being very difficult to achieve. The most frequent bone morphology alteration is low bone turnover disease, while high-turnover osteopathy decreases in frequency after transplantation. Although the pathogenic mechanisms of these abnormalities have not been fully clarified, the available evidence suggests that there are a number of factors that play a very important role, such as immunosuppressive treatment, persistently high levels of PTH, vitamin D deficiency and hypophosphatemia. Fracture risk is four-fold higher in transplanted patients compared to general population. The most relevant risk factors for fracture in the kidney transplant population are diabetes mellitus, female sex, advanced age (especially > 65 years), dialysis vintage, high PTH levels and low phosphate levels, osteoporosis, pre-transplant stress fracture and high doses or prolonged steroids therapy. Treatment alternatives for CKD-MBD after transplantation include minimization of corticosteroids, use of calcium and vitamin D supplements, antiresorptives (bisphosphonates or Denosumab) and osteoformers (synthetic parathyroid hormone). As both mineral metabolism and bone disorders lead to increased morbidity and mortality, the presence of these changes after transplantation has to be prevented (if possible), minimized, diagnosed, and treated as soon as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josep-Vicent Torregrosa
- Nephrology & Renal Transplant Department - Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
- Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Ana Carina Ferreira
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalare, Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
- Nova Medical School, Nova University, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - David Cucchiari
- Nephrology & Renal Transplant Department - Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Aníbal Ferreira
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalare, Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
- Nova Medical School, Nova University, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Regev R, Sochett EB, Elia Y, Laxer RM, Noone D, Whitney-Mahoney K, Filipowski K, Shamas A, Vali R. Multicentric carpotarsal osteolysis syndrome (MCTO) with generalized high bone turnover and high serum RANKL: Response to denosumab. Bone Rep 2021; 14:100747. [PMID: 33506078 PMCID: PMC7815641 DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2021.100747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 01/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
MCTO is a rare disorder, caused by mutations in the MafB gene, a negative regulator of receptor activator of nuclear factor-кB ligand (RANKL). Manifestations include carpal and tarsal osteolysis and renal failure. Pathophysiology is poorly understood, and no effective treatment is available. In this case report we describe a patient with MCTO (MafB, mutation c.206C>T, p.Ser69Leu), diagnosed at the age of 5 years. At 7 years, skeletal survey showed diffuse osteopenia. BMD was mildly reduced, and bone turnover markers increased. He was treated with denosumab, a human monoclonal RANKL inhibitor for two years. Each injection was followed by a marked reduction in C-telopeptide (CTX). Following denosumab his BMD and bone symptoms improved and the osteolysis stabilized. At the age of 13 years, osteoporosis was diagnosed using high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) and serum RANKL was found to be markedly increased. This initial experience suggests that the associated osteoporosis may be ameliorated by denosumab, although further study will be needed to understand the appropriate dose, frequency, and the extent of efficacy. Monitoring of CTX and bone specific alkaline phosphatase will be especially useful in this regard. Further study in other MCTO patients is also needed to determine whether high bone turnover is specific to this mutation or more common than previously appreciated. We propose a model in which osteolysis in this condition is strongly associated with the systemic osteoporosis. MCTO (MafB gene mutation (c.206C>T,p.Ser69Leu) is associated with osteoporosis and very high levels of serum RANKL. Denosumab appears to ameliorate the osteoporosis. Further study is needed regarding the dose and frequency of injections. Examination of the frequency of osteoporosis and association with osteolysis is needed in MCTO
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravit Regev
- Division of Endocrinology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Etienne B Sochett
- Division of Endocrinology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yesmino Elia
- Division of Endocrinology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ronald M Laxer
- Division of Rheumatology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Damien Noone
- Division of Nephrology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Kornelia Filipowski
- Division of Endocrinology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Amer Shamas
- Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Reza Vali
- Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Deligiorgi MV, Trafalis DT. The safety profile of denosumab in oncology beyond the safety of denosumab as an anti-osteoporotic agent: still more to learn. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2020; 20:191-213. [PMID: 33287586 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1861246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Initially endorsed as an antiosteoporotic agent, denosumab ‒ human monoclonal antibody inhibiting the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL)‒ has currently shown an anticancer potential, rationalizing its exploitation in oncology. A prerequisite for leveraging denosumab in oncology is a favorable safety profile. AREAS COVERED The present review provides an overview of the adverse events of denosumab in oncology, with a focus on hypocalcemia, medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw, atypical femoral fracture(s), post-denosumab vertebral fractures, increased risk of infections, and excess of second primary cancer. Representative studies addressing the safety and efficacy of denosumab compared to bisphosphonates in oncology are summarized. Critical gaps in the literature concerning the safety of denosumab in oncology are highlighted as opposed to plenty of available safety data on denosumab as an antiosteoporotic agent. EXPERT OPINION Despite the generally acceptable safety profile of denosumab in oncology, many issues remain unresolved. Further research is mandatory to counteract current challenges, namely: (i) validation of risk factors for adverse events; (ii) elucidation of the pathophysiology of the adverse events in search of actionable molecular pathways; (iii) illumination of the association of denosumab with increased risk of infections and/or second primary cancer; (iv) establishment of optimal diagnostic, and therapeutic protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria V Deligiorgi
- Department of Pharmacology - Clinical Pharmacology Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Faculty of Medicine , Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios T Trafalis
- Department of Pharmacology - Clinical Pharmacology Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Faculty of Medicine , Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bar M, Ott SM, Lewiecki EM, Sarafoglou K, Wu JY, Thompson MJ, Vaux JJ, Dean DR, Saag KG, Hashmi SK, Inamoto Y, Dholaria BR, Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Nagler A, Rodriguez C, Hamilton BK, Shah N, Flowers MED, Savani BN, Carpenter PA. Bone Health Management After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: An Expert Panel Opinion from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2020; 26:1784-1802. [PMID: 32653624 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Bone health disturbances commonly occur after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with loss of bone mineral density (BMD) and avascular necrosis (AVN) foremost among them. BMD loss is related to pretransplantation chemotherapy and radiation exposure and immunosuppressive therapy for graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) and results from deficiencies in growth or gonadal hormones, disturbances in calcium and vitamin D homeostasis, as well as osteoblast and osteoclast dysfunction. Although the pathophysiology of AVN remains unclear, high-dose glucocorticoid exposure is the most frequent association. Various societal treatment guidelines for osteoporosis exist, but the focus is mainly on menopausal-associated osteoporosis. HCT survivors comprise a distinct population with unique comorbidities, making general approaches to bone health management inappropriate in some cases. To address a core set of 16 frequently asked questions (FAQs) relevant to bone health in HCT, the American Society of Transplant and Cellular Therapy Committee on Practice Guidelines convened a panel of experts in HCT, adult and pediatric endocrinology, orthopedics, and oral medicine. Owing to a lack of relevant prospective controlled clinical trials that specifically address bone health in HCT, the answers to the FAQs rely on evidence derived from retrospective HCT studies, results extrapolated from prospective studies in non-HCT settings, relevant societal guidelines, and expert panel opinion. Given the heterogenous comorbidities and needs of individual HCT recipients, answers to FAQs in this article should be considered general recommendations, with good medical practice and judgment ultimately dictating care of individual patients. Readers are referred to the Supplementary Material for answers to additional FAQs that did not make the core set.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merav Bar
- Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Susan M Ott
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - E Michael Lewiecki
- New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Bone Health TeleECHO, UNM Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Kyriakie Sarafoglou
- Department of Pediatrics, Divisions of Endocrinology and Genetics & Metabolism, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Department of Experimental & Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Joy Y Wu
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Matthew J Thompson
- Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jonathan J Vaux
- Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - David R Dean
- Department of Oral Medicine, University of Washington School of Dentistry, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kenneth G Saag
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Shahrukh K Hashmi
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Yoshihiro Inamoto
- Department of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Bhagirathbhai R Dholaria
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja
- Division of Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Arnon Nagler
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Department, Hematology Division, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Cesar Rodriguez
- Department of Internal Medicine Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Betty K Hamilton
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nina Shah
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Mary E D Flowers
- Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Bipin N Savani
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Paul A Carpenter
- Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yang Y, Yu T, Tang H, Ren Z, Li Q, Jia J, Chen H, Fu J, Ding S, Hao Q, Xu D, Song L, Sun B, Sun F, Pei J. Ganoderma lucidum Immune Modulator Protein rLZ-8 Could Prevent and Reverse Bone Loss in Glucocorticoids-Induced Osteoporosis Rat Model. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:731. [PMID: 32508652 PMCID: PMC7248554 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune modulation has been recognized as an effective anti-osteoporosis strategy since the pivotal role of the RANK/RANKL/OPG signaling in bone metabolism and remodeling was discovered. To investigate the potential preventive and/or therapeutic effects of immune modulator protein Ling Zhi-8 (LZ-8) on osteoporosis, the osteoporosis animal model was established in Wistar rats by intramuscular injection of dexamethasone (DEX), namely glucocorticoids-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) rat model. To investigate the potential preventive effect of rLZ-8 on GIOP, we co-treated the rats with DEX and rLZ-8 intraperitoneally during the GIOP modeling stage and analyze the bone mass measured by bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD), as well as levels of phosphorus (Pi), calcium (Ca2+) and hydroxyproline (HOP) in femur of GIOP rats. Consistently, all results suggested that rLZ-8 could prevent bone loss in the femurs of GIOP rats. Through analyzing the trabeculae morphology and the trabeculae amount by H&E staining, we found rLZ-8 could also improve the structural deterioration in femurs of GIOP rats. In order to further verify the results and its mechanism obtained from bone analysis, multiple biomarkers, including minerals metabolism (Pi and Ca2+), bone formation markers (osteocalcin, ALP and IGF-1), bone resorption markers (TRACP5b, CTX-1 and HOP), cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α), oxidative stress indicators (GSH-px, SOD and MDA) and hormone molecules (testosterone, estradiol, calcitonin and parathyroid hormone) have been detected in serum or urine of rats. Results of these biomarkers in serum or urine confirmed rLZ-8’s protective effect in GIOP. Through analyzing the relative expression level of OPG and RANKL in femurs via western blot, we foundrLZ-8 could increase OPG/RANKL ratio which could impede osteoclastogenesis process. To test the potential therapeutic effect of rLZ-8 on successfully generated GIOP rats, we administrated rLZ-8 to rats for three weeks starting from the ending day of 7 weeks treatment of DEX. We found rLZ-8 could also reverse the bone loss in GIOP rats. Through the BWs and organ coefficient analysis, we found rLZ-8 has little toxicity to the rats. Our results suggested that rLZ-8 may be developed into promising anti-osteoporosis drug with both preventive and therapeutic properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Yang
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Tian Yu
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Huan Tang
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Zhihui Ren
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Qianwen Li
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Juan Jia
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Hongyu Chen
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Jun Fu
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Shengchen Ding
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Qiang Hao
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Dan Xu
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Liping Song
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Bo Sun
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Fei Sun
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Jin Pei
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Diker-Cohen T, Rosenberg D, Avni T, Shepshelovich D, Tsvetov G, Gafter-Gvili A. Risk for Infections During Treatment With Denosumab for Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020; 105:5695688. [PMID: 31899506 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgz322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Denosumab inhibits the receptor activator of nuclear factor κ-Β ligand, an immune system modulator. Safety endpoints including risk for infections were assessed as secondary outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the drug. OBJECTIVE To assess the risk of serious adverse events of infections (SAEI) in denosumab-treated patients. DATA SOURCES PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to May 27, 2019. STUDY SELECTION All RCTs of denosumab (60 mg every 6 months) versus any comparator were included. We excluded trials in cancer patients for prevention of skeletal-related events. DATA EXTRACTION Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria and extracted the data. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a fixed effect model. Sensitivity analysis was based on risk of bias. DATA SYNTHESIS Thirty-three studies (22 253 patients) were included. There was a higher incidence of SAEI during denosumab treatment versus any comparator (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04-1.40; I2 = 0%), mainly of ear, nose, and throat (RR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.20-5.91) and gastrointestinal origin (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.02-2.01). RR was similar in a sensitivity analysis based on adequate allocation concealment. The RR of any infection (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.99-1.06) and infection-related mortality (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.20-1.23) was comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS A higher incidence of SAEI is demonstrated during treatment with denosumab in an osteoporosis dose. Nevertheless, the overall risk for any infection or related mortality is similar to comparator groups. These findings merit consideration before therapy initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talia Diker-Cohen
- Medicine A
- Institute of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Dana Rosenberg
- Medicine A
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tomer Avni
- Medicine A
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Gloria Tsvetov
- Institute of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Anat Gafter-Gvili
- Medicine A
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Significant advances in immunosuppressive therapies have been made in renal transplantation, leading to increased allograft and patient survival. Despite improvement in overall patient survival, patients continue to require management of persistent post-transplant hyperparathyroidism. Medications that treat persistent hyperparathyroidism include vitamin D, vitamin D analogues, and calcimimetics. Medication side effects such as hypocalcemia or hypercalcemia, and adynamic bone disease, may lead to a decrease in the drugs. When medical management fails to control persistent post-transplant hyperparathyroidism, treatment is a parathyroidectomy. Surgical techniques are not uniform between centers and surgeons. Undergoing the surgery may include a subtotal technique or a technique including total parathyroid gland resection with partial heterotopic gland reimplantation. In addition, there are possible post-surgical complications. The ideal treatment for persistent post-transplant hyperparathyroidism is the treatment and prevention of the condition while patients are being managed for their late-stage chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rowena Delos Santos
- Division of Nephrology, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8126, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - Ana Rossi
- Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Maine Medical Center, Maine Transplant Program, 19 West St., Portland, ME, 04102, USA
| | - Daniel Coyne
- Division of Nephrology, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8126, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Thin Thin Maw
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Keck School of Medicine of USC, 2020 Zonal Ave, IRD 806, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Palmer SC, Chung EYM, McGregor DO, Bachmann F, Strippoli GFM. Interventions for preventing bone disease in kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 10:CD005015. [PMID: 31637698 PMCID: PMC6803293 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005015.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who have chronic kidney disease (CKD) have important changes to bone structure, strength, and metabolism. Children experience bone deformity, pain, and delayed or impaired growth. Adults experience limb and vertebral fractures, avascular necrosis, and pain. The fracture risk after kidney transplantation is four times that of the general population and is related to Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD) occurring with end-stage kidney failure, steroid-induced bone loss, and persistent hyperparathyroidism after transplantation. Fractures may reduce quality of life and lead to being unable to work or contribute to community roles and responsibilities. Earlier versions of this review have found low certainty evidence for effects of treatment. This is an update of a review first published in 2005 and updated in 2007. OBJECTIVES This review update evaluates the benefits and harms of interventions for preventing bone disease following kidney transplantation. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 16 May 2019 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA RCTs and quasi-RCTs evaluating treatments for bone disease among kidney transplant recipients of any age were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed trial risks of bias and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using random effects meta-analysis. The risk estimates were expressed as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous variables and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes together with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). The primary efficacy outcome was bone fracture. The primary safety outcome was acute graft rejection. Secondary outcomes included death (all cause and cardiovascular), myocardial infarction, stroke, musculoskeletal disorders (e.g. skeletal deformity, bone pain), graft loss, nausea, hyper- or hypocalcaemia, kidney function, serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), and bone mineral density (BMD). MAIN RESULTS In this 2019 update, 65 studies (involving 3598 participants) were eligible; 45 studies contributed data to our meta-analyses (2698 participants). Treatments included bisphosphonates, vitamin D compounds, teriparatide, denosumab, cinacalcet, parathyroidectomy, and calcitonin. Median duration of follow-up was 12 months. Forty-three studies evaluated bone density or bone-related biomarkers, with more recent studies evaluating proteinuria and hyperparathyroidism. Bisphosphonate therapy was usually commenced in the perioperative transplantation period (within 3 weeks) and regardless of BMD. Risks of bias were generally high or unclear leading to lower certainty in the results. A single study reported outcomes among 60 children and adolescents. Studies were not designed to measure treatment effects on fracture, death or cardiovascular outcomes, or graft loss.Compared to placebo, bisphosphonate therapy administered over 12 months in transplant recipients may prevent fracture (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.01; low certainty evidence) although the 95% CI included the possibility that bisphosphonate therapy might make little or no difference. Fracture events were principally vertebral fractures identified during routine radiographic surveillance. It was uncertain whether any other drug class decreased fracture (low or very low certainty evidence). It was uncertain whether interventions for bone disease in kidney transplantation reduce all-cause or cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke, or graft loss in very low certainty evidence. Bisphosphonate therapy may decrease acute graft rejection (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.89; low certainty evidence), while it is uncertain whether any other treatment impacts graft rejection (very low certainty evidence). Bisphosphonate therapy may reduce bone pain (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.93; very low certainty evidence), while it was very uncertain whether bisphosphonates prevent spinal deformity or avascular bone necrosis (very low certainty evidence). Bisphosphonates may increase to risk of hypocalcaemia (RR 5.59, 95% CI 1.00 to 31.06; low certainty evidence). It was uncertain whether vitamin D compounds had any effect on skeletal, cardiovascular, death, or transplant function outcomes (very low certainty or absence of evidence). Evidence for the benefits and harms of all other treatments was of very low certainty. Evidence for children and young adolescents was sparse. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Bisphosphonate therapy may reduce fracture and bone pain after kidney transplantation, however low certainty in the evidence indicates it is possible that treatment may make little or no difference. It is uncertain whether bisphosphonate therapy or other bone treatments prevent other skeletal complications after kidney transplantation, including spinal deformity or avascular bone necrosis. The effects of bone treatment for children and adolescents after kidney transplantation are very uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suetonia C Palmer
- University of Otago ChristchurchDepartment of Medicine2 Riccarton AvePO Box 4345ChristchurchNew Zealand8140
| | - Edmund YM Chung
- Royal North Shore HospitalDepartment of Medicine48 Provincial RoadSydneyNSWAustralia2070
| | - David O McGregor
- Christchurch HospitalDepartment of NephrologyPrivate Bag 4710ChristchurchNew Zealand8001
| | - Friederike Bachmann
- Charité University Medicine BerlinDepartment of Nephrology and Medical Intensive CareCharitéplatz 1BerlinGermany10117
| | - Giovanni FM Strippoli
- University of BariDepartment of Emergency and Organ TransplantationBariItaly
- DiaverumMedical Scientific OfficeLundSweden
- Diaverum AcademyBariItaly
- The Children's Hospital at WestmeadCochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney ResearchWestmeadNSWAustralia2145
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ness D, Olsburgh J. UTI in kidney transplant. World J Urol 2019; 38:81-88. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02742-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
|
22
|
Bonani M, Frey D, Graf N, Wüthrich RP. Effect of denosumab on trabecular bone score in de novo kidney transplant recipients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2019; 34:1773-1780. [DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Accepted: 12/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are at risk to lose bone mass. The trabecular bone score (TBS) represents a recently developed parameter of lumbar spine trabecular bone texture that correlates with the occurrence of fractures.
Methods
We analysed the 1-year changes in TBS in 44 de novo KTR that were randomized 1:1 to denosumab or no treatment. TBS was derived from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and was correlated with 1-year areal bone mineral density (aBMD) changes at the lumbar spine and total hip. Correlations were also performed with parameters of peripheral bone microarchitecture and bone strength at the distal tibia and distal radius, as assessed by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) and micro-finite element analysis.
Results
The baseline TBS in KTR amounted to 1.312 ± 0.101, which is lower than the TBS of an age-matched normal control population (range 1.364–1.471). The TBS correlated positively with aBMD at the lumbar spine (Spearman’s ρ = 0.56; P < 0.001) and total hip (ρ = 0.33; P < 0.05). The baseline TBS also correlated with HRpQCT-derived total (ρ = 0.49; P < 0.05) and trabecular volumetric BMD (ρ = 0.57; P < 0.01) and trabecular separation (ρ = −0.46; P < 0.05) at the tibia. Denosumab treatment led to an increase in TBS, paralleling the BMD changes at the lumbar spine.
Conclusions
The TBS is a useful additional score of bone health, which may help to better define fracture risk. Treatment with denosumab led to improved trabecular bone texture in de novo KTR in addition to its beneficial effect on BMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Bonani
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Diana Frey
- Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Thongprayoon C, Acharya P, Aeddula NR, Torres-Ortiz A, Bathini T, Sharma K, Ungprasert P, Watthanasuntorn K, Suarez MLG, Salim SA, Kaewput W, Chenbhanich J, Mao MA, Cheungpasitporn W. Effects of denosumab on bone metabolism and bone mineral density in kidney transplant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Osteoporos 2019; 14:35. [PMID: 30852679 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-019-0587-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The use of immunosuppressive agents, especially glucocorticoids, are associated with increased risks of bone loss in kidney transplant patients. Denosumab, a potent antiresorptive agent, has been shown to increase bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with CKD. However, its effects on bone metabolism and BMD in kidney transplant patients remain unclear. METHODS A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database from inception through April 2018 to identify studies evaluating denosumab's effect on changes in bone metabolism and BMD from baseline to post-treatment course in kidney transplant patients. Study results were pooled and analyzed utilizing random-effects model. The protocol for this systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; no. CRD42018095055). RESULTS Five studies (a clinical trial and four cohort studies) with a total of 162 kidney transplant patients were identified. The majority of patients had a baseline eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. After treatment (≥ 6 to 12 months), there were significant increases in BMD with standardized mean differences (SMDs) of 3.26 (95% CI 0.88-5.64) and 1.83 (95% CI 0.43 to 3.22) for lumbar spine and femoral neck, respectively. There were also significant increases in T scores with SMDs of 0.92 (95% CI 0.58 to 1.25) and 1.14 (95% CI 0.17 to 2.10) for lumbar spine and femoral neck, respectively. After treatment, there were no significant changes in serum calcium (Ca) or parathyroid hormone (PTH) from baseline to post-treatment course (≥ 6 months) with mean differences (MDs) of 0.52 (95% CI, - 0.13 to 1.16) mmol/L and - 13.24 (95% CI, - 43.85 to 17.37) ng/L, respectively. The clinical trial data demonstrated more asymptomatic hypocalcemia in the denosumab (12 episodes in 39 patients) than in the control (1 episode in 42 patients) group. From the cohort studies, the pooled incidence of hypocalcemia following denosumab treatment was 1.7% (95% CI 0.4 to 6.6%). All reported hypocalcemic episodes were mild and asymptomatic, but the majority of patients required Ca and vitamin D supplements. CONCLUSION Among kidney transplant patients with good allograft function, denosumab effectively increases BMD and T scores in the lumbar spine and femur neck. From baseline to post-treatment, there are no differences in serum Ca and PTH. However, mild hypocalcemia can occur following denosumab treatment, requiring monitoring and titration of Ca and vitamin D supplements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charat Thongprayoon
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Prakrati Acharya
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N. State St, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA
| | - Narothama Reddy Aeddula
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine and Deaconess Health System, Evansville, IN, USA
| | - Aldo Torres-Ortiz
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N. State St, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA
| | - Tarun Bathini
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Konika Sharma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bassett Medical Center, Cooperstown, NY, USA
| | - Patompong Ungprasert
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Research and Development, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Maria Lourdes Gonzalez Suarez
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N. State St, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA
| | - Sohail Abdul Salim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N. State St, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA
| | - Wisit Kaewput
- Department of Military and Community Medicine, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Jirat Chenbhanich
- Department of Internal Medicine, Metrowest Medical Center, Framingham, MA, USA
| | - Michael A Mao
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Wisit Cheungpasitporn
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N. State St, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Iseri K, Iyoda M, Watanabe M, Matsumoto K, Sanada D, Inoue T, Tachibana S, Shibata T. The effects of denosumab and alendronate on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in patients with glomerular disease: A randomized, controlled trial. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0193846. [PMID: 29543887 PMCID: PMC5854344 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 02/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The clinical utility of denosumab for the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) has yet to be established. This study aimed to compare the effects of denosumab on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers to those of alendronate in patients with GIOP. METHODS A prospective, single-center study of 32 patients (18 men; median age, 66.0 years) with glomerular disease receiving prednisolone (PSL) who were diagnosed as having GIOP and had not received bisphosphonates before was conducted. Participants were randomized to either alendronate (35 mg orally once a week) or denosumab (60 mg subcutaneously once every 6 months), and all subjects received calcitriol. The primary endpoint was the percent change in lumbar spine (LS) BMD at 12 months of treatment. RESULTS The demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline were not significantly different between the groups. Denosumab treatment markedly decreased serum levels of t-PINP, BAP, and TRACP-5b at 12 months compared to baseline (-57.4%, p<0.001; -30.9%, p<0.01; -57.7%, p<0.001, respectively). After 12 months of alendronate treatment, serum levels of t-PINP, BAP, and TRACP-5b were also significantly decreased compared to pretreatment (-38.9%, p<0.01; -16.3%, p<0.05; -43.5%, p<0.01, respectively). However, no significant differences in the changes of bone turnover markers were found between the two groups. As for the effects on BMD, denosumab treatment markedly increased LS BMD from 6 months compared to baseline, whereas no significant difference compared to pretreatment was found in the alendronate group during the study period. In the comparison of the two groups, a large increase of LS BMD was found in the denosumab treatment group compared to the alendronate treatment group at 12 months (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS In patients with GIOP, denosumab treatment markedly suppressed bone turnover, which led to a significantly greater increase in LS BMD than with alendronate treatment. These results suggest that denosumab is a therapeutic option for the treatment of GIOP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Iseri
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Nephrology Center, Makita General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayuki Iyoda
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Makoto Watanabe
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Nephrology Center, Makita General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kei Matsumoto
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Sanada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Inoue
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shohei Tachibana
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takanori Shibata
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Brunova J, Kratochvilova S, Stepankova J. Osteoporosis Therapy With Denosumab in Organ Transplant Recipients. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2018; 9:162. [PMID: 29720961 PMCID: PMC5915642 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Accepted: 03/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Osteoporosis and fragility fractures represent serious complications for the solid organ transplant population. The recommended osteoporosis therapy for organ recipients involves supplementation with calcium and vitamin D and bisphosphonate administration. However, these options can prove limited for patients with impaired renal function. An alternative therapy option is offered by denosumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated 63 patients with osteoporosis (23 males and 40 females, age 56.4 ± 13.1 years) following solid organ transplantation (15 diabetic patients after simultaneous transplantation of the kidney and pancreas, 34 patients after kidney transplantation, and 14 patients with liver grafts). Osteoporosis was diagnosed according to standard DEXA examination using the Lunar Prodigy apparatus. Transplanted patients with impaired renal function were treated for osteoporosis of the lumbar spine (L-spine) and/or proximal femur with calcium and vitamin D supplementation and 60 mg of denosumab every 6 months between the years 2012 and 2017. The mean duration of the therapy was 1.65 ± 0.7 years. RESULTS After denosumab therapy, L-spine T-scores improved across the whole group, ranging from -2.7 ± 0.09 to -1.8 ± 1.0 (p < 0.001). T-score values for the proximal femur increased from -2.5 ± 0.8 to -2.0 ± 0.7 after the therapy (p < 0.01). We observed only a mild, statistically insignificant improvement in distal forearm T-scores. The mean increase in L-spine bone mineral density (BMD) was 11.5 ± 6.2% in subjects with osteoporosis at this site and 10.4 ± 6.1% in the case of all patients. BMD of the proximal femur increased by 10.4 ± 8.3% in patients with osteoporosis and by 7.5 ± 7.3% in all patients. Denosumab therapy decreased the prevalence of osteoporosis in the L-spine from 75 to 27% (p < 0.001) and proximal femur osteoporosis from 54 to 36% (p < 0.05). Denosumab therapy reduced elevated levels of osteocalcin and beta-crosslaps (βCTX) in comparison with baseline levels (p < 0.001) across the whole group of graft recipients. CONCLUSION Denosumab therapy was well-tolerated and improved bone density in our group of solid organ transplant recipients. The indications are that denosumab could be a viable therapeutic option for transplanted patients with osteoporosis, especially in those with renal function impairment or bisphosphonate intolerance.
Collapse
|
26
|
Pavone V, Testa G, Giardina SMC, Vescio A, Restivo DA, Sessa G. Pharmacological Therapy of Osteoporosis: A Systematic Current Review of Literature. Front Pharmacol 2017; 8:803. [PMID: 29163183 PMCID: PMC5682013 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Osteoporosis is the most common bone disease affecting millions of people worldwide, particularly in elderly or in post-menopausal women. The pathogenesis is useful to understand the possible mechanism of action of anti-osteoporotic drugs. Early diagnosis, possible with several laboratory and instrumental tests, allows a major accuracy in the choice of anti-osteoporosis drugs. Treatment of osteoporosis is strictly related to severity of pathology and consists on prevention of fragility fractures with a correct lifestyle and adequate nutritional supplements, and use of pharmacological therapy, started in patients with osteopenia and history of fragility fracture of the hip or spine. The purpose of this review is to focus on main current pharmacological products to treat osteoporotic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vito Pavone
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Medico-Chirurgiche, Sezione di Ortopedia, A.O.U.P. Vittorio Emanuele, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Gianluca Testa
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Medico-Chirurgiche, Sezione di Ortopedia, A.O.U.P. Vittorio Emanuele, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Serena M. C. Giardina
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Medico-Chirurgiche, Sezione di Ortopedia, A.O.U.P. Vittorio Emanuele, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Andrea Vescio
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Medico-Chirurgiche, Sezione di Ortopedia, A.O.U.P. Vittorio Emanuele, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Domenico A. Restivo
- Neurologic Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Nuovo “Garibaldi” Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sessa
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Medico-Chirurgiche, Sezione di Ortopedia, A.O.U.P. Vittorio Emanuele, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|