1
|
Zimbrean PC, Rubman S, Andacoglu O, Bakhai D, Clifton E, Deng Y, Doshi M, Emamaullee J, Gan G, Holmes R, Jaber L, Jackson WE, Joyce M, Kalil R, Kumar V, Laflen J, Lentine KL, Prashar R, Winder GS, Yadav A, Liapakis A. Psychosocial evaluation of living liver donors-State of current practices in the United States. Liver Transpl 2024; 30:505-518. [PMID: 37861339 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
We surveyed living donor liver transplant programs in the United States to describe practices in the psychosocial evaluation of living donors focused on (1) composition of psychosocial team; (2) domains, workflow, and tools of the psychosocial assessment; (3) absolute and relative mental health-related contraindications to donation; and (4) postdonation psychosocial follow-up. We received 52 unique responses, representing 33 of 50 (66%) of active living donor liver transplant programs. Thirty-one (93.9%) provider teams included social workers, 22 (66.7%) psychiatrists, and 14 (42.4%) psychologists. Validated tools were rarely used, but domains assessed were consistent. Respondents rated active alcohol (93.8%), cocaine (96.8%), and opioid (96.8%) use disorder, as absolute contraindications to donation. Active suicidality (97%), self-injurious behavior (90.9%), eating disorders (87.9%), psychosis (84.8%), nonadherence (71.9%), and inability to cooperate with the evaluation team (78.1%) were absolute contraindications to donation. There were no statistically significant differences in absolute psychosocial contraindications to liver donation between geographical areas or between large and small programs. Programs conduct postdonation psychosocial follow-up (57.6%) or screening (39.4%), but routine follow-up of declined donors is rarely conducted (15.8%). Psychosocial evaluation of donor candidates is a multidisciplinary process. The structure of the psychosocial evaluation of donors is not uniform among programs though the domains assessed are consistent. Psychosocial contraindications to living liver donation vary among the transplant programs. Mental health follow-up of donor candidates is not standardized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula C Zimbrean
- Departments of Psychiatry and Surgery (Transplant), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Susan Rubman
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Oya Andacoglu
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Darshit Bakhai
- Department of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Erin Clifton
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Yanhong Deng
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Mona Doshi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Juliet Emamaullee
- Department of Surgery, Keck Medicine of USC/Children's Hospital-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Geliang Gan
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Rachel Holmes
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Lana Jaber
- Department of Surgery, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Whitney E Jackson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Michael Joyce
- Department of Social Work, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Roberto Kalil
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Vineeta Kumar
- Comprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Jennie Laflen
- Department of Surgery, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Krista L Lentine
- Department of Internal Medicine, SM Health Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Rohini Prashar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Gerald S Winder
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Anju Yadav
- Department of Internal Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ziogas IA, Kakos CD, Moris DP, Kaltenmeier C, Tsoulfas G, Montenovo MI, Alexopoulos SP, Geller DA, Pomfret EA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopy-assisted versus pure laparoscopic versus robotic living donor hepatectomy. Liver Transpl 2023; 29:1063-1078. [PMID: 36866856 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
The value of minimally invasive approaches for living donor hepatectomy remains unclear. Our aim was to compare the donor outcomes after open versus laparoscopy-assisted versus pure laparoscopic versus robotic living donor hepatectomy (OLDH vs. LALDH vs. PLLDH vs. RLDH). A systematic literature review of the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement (up to December 8, 2021). Random-effects meta-analyses were performed separately for minor and major living donor hepatectomy. The risk of bias in nonrandomized studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A total of 31 studies were included. There was no difference in donor outcomes after OLDH versus LALDH for major hepatectomy. However, PLLDH was associated with decreased estimated blood loss, length of stay (LOS), and overall complications versus OLDH for minor and major hepatectomy, but also with increased operative time for major hepatectomy. PLLDH was associated with decreased LOS versus LALDH for major hepatectomy. RLDH was associated with decreased LOS but with increased operative time versus OLDH for major hepatectomy. The scarcity of studies comparing RLDH versus LALDH/PLLDH did not allow us to meta-analyze donor outcomes for that comparison. There seems to be a marginal benefit in estimated blood loss and/or LOS in favor of PLLDH and RLDH. The complexity of these procedures limits them to transplant centers with high volume and experience. Future studies should investigate self-reported donor experience and the associated economic costs of these approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis A Ziogas
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece
| | - Christos D Kakos
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios P Moris
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christof Kaltenmeier
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Georgios Tsoulfas
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Hippokration General Hospital, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Martin I Montenovo
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - David A Geller
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Pomfret
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fan Y, Nashan B, Wu X, Zhang H, Shi Y. Prevalence and factors associated with depression and anxiety in living liver donors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res 2023; 173:111443. [PMID: 37562147 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to systematically review the prevalence and factors associated with depression and anxiety in living liver donors after liver transplantation. METHODS Five English language electronic databases and four Chinese language electronic databases were searched from inception to February 2023. Two investigators independently extracted the data and assessed the study quality. The pooled prevalence was calculated using STATA software (version 14.0). We performed a narrative review to summarize the factors associated with depression and anxiety in living liver donors after liver transplantation. The protocol of this study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database, registration number: CRD42021290071. RESULTS This study included 39 articles involving 18,577 participants. The pooled prevalence was 6.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) (4.1-8.9%)] for depression in living liver donors, and 10.0% [95% CI (4.0-18.1%)] for anxiety. Prevalence of clinically significant depressive or anxiety symptoms was higher (15.7% and 17.4%) compared with disorders (2.7% and 2.2%). The prevalence of depression and anxiety was highest within 3 months post-donation. Specifically, female donors, serious postoperative complications, and recipients' poor health/death have been reported as factors having a negative influence on depression and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS Collected evidence showed that the overall prevalence of depression or anxiety of living liver donors was high. Therefore, early detection and timely treatment of psychological disorders are crucial to promote positive psychiatric health outcomes and ensure the quality of life of living liver donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaru Fan
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| | - Björn Nashan
- Department of Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
| | - Xiaxin Wu
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| | - Haiming Zhang
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Beijing Key Laboratory of Tolerance Induction and Organ Protection in Transplantation, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| | - Yuexian Shi
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shi Y, Zhang H, Zhu Z. A systematic review of the factors significantly influencing the quality of life of living liver donors. Int J Nurs Sci 2023; 10:579-586. [PMID: 38020831 PMCID: PMC10667322 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives This systematic review aimed to synthesize the literature on factors influencing the quality of life in living liver donors post-donation and to provide a reference for developing targeted interventions in clinical practice. Methods A systematic search guided by the PRISMA 2020 approach was performed on specific databases: PubMed, EMBASE, CINHAL with full text, Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses databases. Peer-reviewed articles published in English from inception to October 2022 covering cross-sectional studies and longitudinal studies on factors affecting the quality of life of living liver donors after donation were included in this systematic review. The methodological quality of the studies was examined using a modified version of the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool. Results A total of 6,576 studies were retrieved, and 16 eligible studies were finally included. Four types of independent influencing factors: sociodemographic (gender, donor age, education, ethnicity, and marital status), donation-related (length of hospital stay and number of hospitalizations/hospital visits related to donation surgery, recipient outcome, time from donation, complications, donation decision, ambivalence about donating, donor-recipient relationship), health-related (body mass index and pre-donation physical symptoms), and psychosocial (pre-donation physical and mental score, household income, anxiety, depression), were extracted from the included studies. Several studies consistently identified old age, recipient death, recent donation, postoperative complications experienced by donors, and donor concerns about their well-being as negative influencing factors on physical function. Female donors, low education levels, longer hospital stays, and/or more hospital visits due to donation, poor recipient outcome, recent donation, pre-donation concerns regarding their well-being, and first-degree relative and spouse/partner donors were reported in several studies as negative predictors for psychological status. Factors affecting social function were considered by only two included articles. Conclusions The quality of life of living liver donors could be affected by both donation surgery and psychosocial factors. Based on the above-influencing factors, clinical nurses can develop targeted interventions to improve the quality of life of living liver donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuexian Shi
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Haiming Zhang
- Liver Transplantation Center, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Clinical Center for Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhijun Zhu
- Liver Transplantation Center, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Clinical Center for Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Samaha C, Chaaban H, Simsek C, Danis N, Lin JS, Gurakar A. Practice patterns and considerations in liver transplantation from living donors with high BMI: A review. HEPATOLOGY FORUM 2023; 4:145-149. [PMID: 37822307 PMCID: PMC10564250 DOI: 10.14744/hf.2023.2023.0030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
Living Donor Liver Transplantation (LDLT) is a valuable solution to the shortage of donor organs for patients with end-stage liver disease. However, the eligibility of obese donors for LDLT remains a subject of debate. This literature review explores global practices and perceptions of LDLT, identifies donor eligibility criteria, and discusses special considerations and ethical caveats. The review highlights the need for standardized guidelines for donor selection, considering the global distribution of Body mass index and variations in population-specific criteria. It also emphasizes the importance of non-invasive testing and pre-operative optimization of liver steatosis for select obese donors. Furthermore, the review examines the outcomes and complications associated with obese donors in LDLT. The findings of this review contribute to the ongoing discussion on the inclusion of obese donors in LDLT and provide insights for future research and guideline development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Samaha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hadi Chaaban
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Cem Simsek
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nilay Danis
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jessica S. Lin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ahmet Gurakar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Goto R, Kawamura N, Watanabe M, Ganchiku Y, Nagatsu A, Okada K, Ito YM, Kamiyama T, Shimamura T, Taketomi A. Long-term risk of a fatty liver in liver donors. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:645-653. [PMID: 37416731 PMCID: PMC10319612 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 12/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim Approximately 30 years have passed since the first experience of living donor liver transplantation. The time to evaluate the long-term safety of living donors has been fulfilled. Meanwhile, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is increasingly common and a critical problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of living donor, focusing on fatty liver postdonation hepatectomy. Methods Living donors (n = 212, 1997-2019) were evaluated by computed tomography (CT) at >1-year postdonation. A liver to spleen (L/S) ratio of <1.1 was defined as fatty liver. Results Among 212 living liver donors, 30 (14.2%) detected fatty liver at 5.3 ± 4.2 years postdonation. The cumulative incidence rates of fatty liver were 3.1%, 12.1%, 22.1%, and 27.7% at 2, 5, 10, and 15 years postdonation, respectively. Of 30 subjects who developed fatty liver, 18 (60%) displayed a severe steatosis (L/S ratio <0.9). Five (16.7%) had a prior history of excessive alcohol abuse. More than 30% developed metabolic syndrome including obesity, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes. Although six (20%) had a Fib-4 index of >1.3, which included a case with a Fib-4 index of >2.67, no significant increased Fib-4 index was observed in the subjects with fatty liver as compared to those without fatty liver (p = 0.66). The independent predictive risk factors for developing fatty liver were male sex, pediatric recipient, and higher body mass index (>25) at donation. Conclusion Living donors with risk factors for developing fatty liver should be carefully followed-up for the prevention and management of metabolic syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryoichi Goto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery IHokkaido University Graduate School of MedicineSapporoJapan
| | - Norio Kawamura
- Department of Transplant SurgeryHokkaido University Graduate School of MedicineSapporoJapan
| | - Masaaki Watanabe
- Department of Transplant SurgeryHokkaido University Graduate School of MedicineSapporoJapan
| | - Yoshikazu Ganchiku
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery IHokkaido University Graduate School of MedicineSapporoJapan
| | - Akihisa Nagatsu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery IHokkaido University Graduate School of MedicineSapporoJapan
| | - Kazufumi Okada
- Data Science Center, Promotion Unit, Institute of Health Science Innovation for Medical CareHokkaido University HospitalSapporoJapan
| | - Yoichi M. Ito
- Data Science Center, Promotion Unit, Institute of Health Science Innovation for Medical CareHokkaido University HospitalSapporoJapan
| | - Toshiya Kamiyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery IHokkaido University Graduate School of MedicineSapporoJapan
| | - Tsuyoshi Shimamura
- Division of Organ TransplantationHokkaido University HospitalSapporoJapan
| | - Akinobu Taketomi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery IHokkaido University Graduate School of MedicineSapporoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lu YF, Gao LQ, He K, Xi HQ. Health-related quality of life of pediatric living donor liver transplantation donors who undergone donation surgery for 10 years †. FRONTIERS OF NURSING 2023. [DOI: 10.2478/fon-2023-0009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the quality of life (QOL) of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) donors.
Methods: The EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) was used to measure the QOL of donors.
Results: One donor reported “a little problem” of mobility (MO), and 2 donors (9.1%) reported “a little problem” of usual activities (UA). Moreover, there were 8 donors (36.4%) and 7 donors (31.8%) declaring “a little problem” of pain/discomfort (PD) and anxiety/depression (AD), respectively. And both dimensions have a donor reporting “moderate problem.” The mean visual analog scale (VAS) was 83.1 ± 12.4.
Conclusions: Donors can gain a stable and preferable QOL after donation in both the short and long terms. ED-5D application in the field of liver transplant could be an effective choice in QOL studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye-Feng Lu
- a Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine , Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai , China
| | - Lei-Qing Gao
- a Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine , Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai , China
| | - Kang He
- a Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine , Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai , China
| | - Hui-Qin Xi
- b Nursing Department, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine , Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai , China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Akamatsu N, Hasegawa K, Nojiri K, Muto K, Shimizu J, Soeda E, Kawagishi N, Marubashi S, Mizuta K, Kaido T, Taketomi A, Ohdan H, Uemoto S, Kokudo N. Long-term quality of life of living liver donors: A Japanese nationwide survey. Liver Transpl 2022; 28:1800-1803. [PMID: 35652234 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuhisa Akamatsu
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kayo Nojiri
- Department of Nursing, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kaori Muto
- Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Information Studies, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junichi Shimizu
- Department of Nursing, Tokyo Healthcare University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Etsuko Soeda
- Faculty of Nursing and Medical Care, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Kawagishi
- The Division of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Imakane Town National Health Insurance Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Shigeru Marubashi
- Division of Surgery, Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Koichi Mizuta
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Toshimi Kaido
- Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akinobu Taketomi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hideki Ohdan
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | | | - Norihiro Kokudo
- Department of Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee YS, Koh CK, Yi NJ, Suh KS, Lee KW. Does living liver donors' underestimation about surgical outcomes impact on their health-related quality of life after donation?: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2022; 20:146. [PMID: 36280848 PMCID: PMC9594971 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-022-02055-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In South Korea, the number of living-donor liver transplantations in 2019 was 1,188. Living liver donors (LLDs) undergo surgery and the postoperative recovery process for altruistic purposes. This study explored LLDs’ unmet expectations about surgical outcomes and examined their impact on the donors’ health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Methods This descriptive cross-sectional study utilized a self-reported survey. Data were collected at a university hospital in Seoul, South Korea. Among the 535 LLDs who underwent surgery for donation between January 2011 and March 2021, 124 participated in this study. The Korean version of the 12-item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2) was used to measure the HRQOL of LLDs. Unmet expectations regarding surgical outcomes were measured using four items: pain, length of hospital stay, speed of recovery, and complications. Logistic regression model was applied to determine whether the unmet expectations influence HRQOL in LLDs. Odds ratios with 95% confidence interval were used. Results The percentage of the participants who reported that their actual experiences for pain, speed of recovery, hospital stay, and complications were worse than expected were 34.7%, 22.6%, 9.7%, and 7.3%, respectively. Unmet expectations about surgical outcomes were significantly associated with physical and mental HRQOL after controlling for age, sex, education level, income, postoperative complications, recipients’ death, time since donation, and satisfaction with the decision to donate. Conclusion LLDs should be supported in obtaining more accurate and realistic information about surgical outcomes to decrease unmet expectations, which may help improve their quality of life. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-022-02055-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye Sol Lee
- grid.31501.360000 0004 0470 5905College of Nursing, Seoul National University, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, 03080 Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chin Kang Koh
- grid.31501.360000 0004 0470 5905College of Nursing, The Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, 03080 Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- grid.31501.360000 0004 0470 5905Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, 03080 Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- grid.31501.360000 0004 0470 5905Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, 03080 Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- grid.31501.360000 0004 0470 5905Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, 03080 Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Choi JY, Kim JH, Kim JM, Kim HJ, Ahn HS, Joh JW. Outcomes of living liver donors are worse than those of matched healthy controls. J Hepatol 2022; 76:628-638. [PMID: 34785324 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Donor death is the most serious complication of living liver donation but is reported rarely. We investigated the actual mortality of living liver donors (LLDs) compared with matched control groups based on analysis of the Korean National Health Insurance Services (NHIS) database. METHODS This cohort study included 12,372 LLDs who donated a liver graft between 2002 and 2018, and were registered in the Korean Network for Organ Sharing. They were compared to 3 matched control groups selected from the Korean NHIS and comprising a total of 123,710 individuals: healthy population (Group I); general population without comorbidities (Group II); and general population with comorbidities (Group III). RESULTS In this population, 78.5% of living liver donors were 20-39 years old, and 64.7% of all donors were male. Eighty-nine donors (0.7%) in the LLD group died (68 males and 21 females), a mortality rate (/1,000 person-years) of 0.91 (0.74-1.12). Mortality rate ratio and the adjusted hazard ratio of the LLD group was 2.03 (1.61-2.55) and 1.71 (1.31-2.25) compared to Control Group I, 0.75 (0.60-0.93) and 0.63 (0.49-0.82) compared to Control Group II, and 0.58 (0.46-0.71) and 0.49 (0.39-0.60) compared to Control Group III. LLD group, depression, and lower income were risk factors for adjusted mortality. The incidence of liver failure, depression, cancer, diabetes, hypertension, brain infarction, brain hemorrhage, and end-stage renal disease in the LLD group was significantly higher than in Control Group I. CONCLUSIONS Outcomes of the LLD group were worse than those of the matched healthy control group despite the small number of deaths and medical morbidities in this group. LLDs should receive careful medical attention for an extended period after donation. LAY SUMMARY The incidence of mortality, liver failure, depression, cancer, diabetes, hypertension, brain infarction, brain hemorrhage, and end-stage renal disease in the living liver donor group was significantly higher than in the matched healthy group. Careful donor evaluation and selection processes can improve donor safety and enable safe living donor liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Yong Choi
- Department of General Surgery, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Jae Heon Kim
- Department of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Hyun Jung Kim
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Hyeong Sik Ahn
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae-Won Joh
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shi YX, Zhang HM, Chen J, Huang YQ, Yu MM, Jin YH, Wang WR, Gao W. Health-Related Quality of Life in Predominantly Young Parental Living Liver Donors: A Cross-Sectional Study in China. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:726103. [PMID: 34660636 PMCID: PMC8517132 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.726103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of donors deserves attention and must be considered for a long time. Many of the published studies had small sample sizes, and research from mainland China, in particular, is scant. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the HRQoL of living liver donors and identify the influencing factors of the HRQoL in mainland China. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. The data were collected from the liver transplantation center, the Tianjin First Center Hospital, China. Living liver donors older than 18 years and at a minimum of 1-month, post-donation was included. The HRQoL was evaluated using the Medical Outcome Study Short form 36 (SF-36). Sociodemographic and clinical-related variables, HRQoL status, and its potential impact factors were analyzed. Results: A total of 382 living liver donors completed the survey. The median number of months post-donation was 25, and parental donors (99.2%) were the most frequent relationship. The majority of the participants (372, 97.4%) donated their left lateral lobes. Thirty-two (8.4%) donors suffered complications, and of them, 7 suffered from biliary leakage (1.8%), which was the most common one in this study. The physical functioning (PF), role–physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), social functioning (SF), role–emotional (RE), and mental health (MH) scores among the living liver donors were significantly better than those of the Chinese norms. Short-time post-donation [odds ratio (OR): 0.008; p < 0.001] and male recipients (OR:0.195; p = 0.024) were associated with the likelihood of a poor physical related quality of life. Conclusions: Despite, in general, good HRQoL outcomes, we also believed that liver donation has an obvious influence on the physical functions of liver donors. More attention and long-term follow-ups are necessary for donors at higher risk based on identified influencing factors and correlates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue-Xian Shi
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Hai-Ming Zhang
- Liver Transplantation Center, Clinical Center for Pediatric Liver Transplantation, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Chen
- Department of Liver Transplantation, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ya-Qi Huang
- School of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Ming-Ming Yu
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yin-Hui Jin
- Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Wen-Ru Wang
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wei Gao
- Department of Liver Transplantation, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hong SK, Choe S, Yi NJ, Shin A, Choe EK, Yoon KC, Lee KW, Suh KS. Long-term Survival of 10,116 Korean Live Liver Donors. Ann Surg 2021; 274:375-382. [PMID: 31850982 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the long-term mortality of Korean live liver donors using data from a national donor registry by comparing it with the mortality of the general population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Although live liver donors generally have a healthy status, their long-term mortality has not been properly addressed in a large donor registry. METHODS Data of 10,116 live liver donors were drawn from a mandated national registry of Korean live liver donors between 2000 and 2015. Matched controls were selected from the Korean National Health Insurance System-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC). Median (range) follow-up of liver donors was 5.7 (0-15.9) years. Donors were 1:3 individually matched to controls by sex and 5-year age group; potential controls were from the whole NHIS-NSC (Control 1) or from NHIS-NSC after excluding people with contraindications to be organ donors (Control 2) (donor, n = 7538; Control 1, n = 28,248; Control 2, n = 28,248). RESULTS Fifty-three deaths occurred after donation. Ten-year cumulative mortality of live liver donors was 0.9%. The most common cause of death was suicide (n = 19) followed by cancer (n = 9) and traffic accident (n = 7). In the matched control analysis, overall risk of death was significantly lower in donors than in Control 1 (P < 0.001), but higher than in Control 2 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Liver donors have increased long-term mortality risk compared to similar healthy controls without contraindications to be organ donors. Therefore, long-term follow-up, including psychosocial support, is needed for live liver donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine
| | - Sunho Choe
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine
| | - Aesun Shin
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine
| | - Eun Kyung Choe
- Department of Surgery, Healthcare Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center
| | - Kyung Chul Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Division of HBP Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ng CH, Lim WH, Lim XC, Xiao J, Tan DJH, Syn N, Ho CS, Kow AWC, Tan EXX, Fung J, Muthiah MD. A Meta-Analysis on the Incidence of Donor Related Depression after Liver Transplant. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2061-2070. [PMID: 34273136 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is increasing, yet gaps exist in the understanding of psychological wellbeing of donors after liver transplant. This meta-analysis seeks to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for donor-related depression after liver transplantation. METHODS A search was conducted on Medline and Embase database. Articles assessing incidence of depression in LDLT donors were included. Incidence was pooled after Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformation. For risk factors, dichotomous variables were analyzed with generalized linear model while a conventional meta regression with logit transformation was conducted for continuous variables. RESULTS Of 1,069 abstracts, 40 articles underwent full-text review. 17 articles were included. The pooled incidence of depression among 1,888 LT donors was 7.66% (CI: 4.47% - 12.80%). Depression rates were significantly higher in Asian compared to Western studies (RR: 1.73, CI: 1.19 - 2.52, p=0.0039). Female gender (p<0.001), Caucasian ethnicity (p=0.047), employment status (p<0.001) and lower education levels (p=0.044) were significantly associated with depression. Donor relationship with recipients was not a significant risk factor. CONCLUSIONS LDLT remains a core aspect of the treatment of end-stage liver disease. However, the high depression rates after LT suggest that there remains room for improvement in the care of donors' mental health post-transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Han Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wen Hui Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Xiong Chang Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jieling Xiao
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Darren Jun Hao Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Biostatistics & Modelling Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore
| | - Cyrus Sh Ho
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alfred Wei Chieh Kow
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore.,Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital.,Division of Surgical Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Eunice Xiang Xuan Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - James Fung
- Division of Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Mark Dhinesh Muthiah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ong JQL, Lim LJH, Ho RCM, Ho CSH. Depression, anxiety, and associated psychological outcomes in living organ transplant donors: A systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2021; 70:51-75. [PMID: 33721612 DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
With increasing demands for living organ donations, understanding the prevalence of depression and anxiety, which are the commonest psychiatric disorders in donors following organ transplantation, will serve to improve psychiatric care to safeguard donors' mental wellbeing. This descriptive systematic review examines all observational studies in English investigating prevalence of depression and anxiety in adult transplant donors using bibliographic databases. Sixty-two papers were included (kidney, n = 25; liver, n = 25; bone marrow, n = 7; uterus, n = 2; lung, n = 1; kidney and lung concurrently, n = 2). Post-transplantation depression and anxiety prevalence rates (Depression: 0-46.9%, Anxiety: 0-66.7%) did not differ significantly from pre-transplantation and were largely comparable to the general population. Other psychiatric disorders observed included bipolar disorder, conversion disorder, adjustment disorder and sleep disorder. Other psychological outcomes observed included lower quality of life, lower satisfaction of life and regret after donation. Pre-donation risk factors such as poor physical/psychological health status, and post-donation risk factors such as complicated post-surgical recovery and poor physical/psychological health in recipients were identified, predisposing donors to poor psychological outcomes. Individuals with risk factors should be monitored and provided with social support, psychoeducation, psychotherapy and long-term follow up. Future studies should adopt consistent methodological approaches to improve comparability between various studies. More research investigating poor psychological outcomes in other organ donors besides kidney and liver donors, donors who have past psychiatric history, unrelated and parent donors is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Q L Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Roger C M Ho
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Institute of Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cyrus S H Ho
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tomer N, Small A, Mirza O, Palese M. Evidence of Resilience in Kidney Donors: A New York Statewide Cohort Analysis. Transplant Proc 2021; 53:803-807. [PMID: 33551185 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Donor nephrectomy (DN) is a procedure performed to provide recipients with a kidney to treat end-stage renal disease. The following analysis evaluated depression diagnosis in DN patients compared to controls. METHODS DN patients and matched controls were identified between 2000 and 2009 from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. Cohorts were tracked for depression incidence. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of a postoperative depression diagnosis. RESULTS The total study cohort included 2108 DN cases and 2108 controls. In both donors and controls, the baseline rate of depression was 0.95% (n = 20). The 5-year incidence of depression diagnosis after exposure increased in both cohorts (donors: 2.5%, n = 53; controls: 7.2%, n = 152; P < .001). The 5-year relative risk for developing depression was 2.65 (CI 1.59-4.42, P = .0002) in donors and 7.60 (CI 4.79-12.07, P < .001) in controls. On multivariable regression, being a donor was associated with reduced risk of developing postoperative depression (OR = 0.322, CI 0.233-0.445, P < .001), and the greatest risk factor for postoperative depression was a prior depressive diagnosis (OR = 7.811, CI 3.814-15.997, P < .001). CONCLUSION Our analysis shows that the strongest risk factor for depression was a prior diagnosis of depression. However, willingness to undergo donor nephrectomy is associated with less subsequent depression than the control population, suggesting that kidney donors may be a more resilient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nir Tomer
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Alexander Small
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Omar Mirza
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Michael Palese
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Liver transplantation has become established as a standard procedure in the treatment of end-stage liver diseases. Despite intense efforts by all parties involved up to the amendment of the German Transplantation Act, the lack of suitable donor organs was still one of the limiting factors of this therapeutic procedure. One way out of this problem is to make so-called marginal organs usable, e.g. with the help of machine perfusion or by utilizing living liver donation, which are used in some countries for more than 90% of organ donations. In general, there is no difference in the indications for liver transplantation between a (partial) organ obtained by post-mortem or living donation. Before any living donation, a thorough evaluation of the donor is carried out in order to minimize postoperative morbidity as far as possible. Technically the partial liver donation is based on the oncological liver resection, while the partial liver transplantation is a further development of split liver transplantation after post-mortem liver donation. In specialized centers comparable or even better results can nowadays be achieved using living liver donation instead of post-mortem donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H-M Tautenhahn
- Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland.
- Research Programme "Else Kröner-Forschungskolleg AntiAge", Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland.
| | - F Rauchfuß
- Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland
| | - A Ali Deeb
- Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland
| | - A Bauschke
- Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland
| | - U Settmacher
- Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Raza MH, Kim MH, Ding L, Fong TL, Romero C, Genyk Y, Sher L, Emamaullee J. Long-Term Financial, Psychosocial, and Overall Health-Related Quality of Life After Living Liver Donation. J Surg Res 2020; 253:41-52. [PMID: 32320896 PMCID: PMC8351216 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Revised: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the impact of living liver donation (LD) in a diverse and aging population up to 20 y after donation, particularly with regard to medical, financial, psychosocial, and overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS Patients undergoing LD between 1999 and 2009 were recruited to respond to the Short-Form 36 and a novel Donor Quality of Life Survey at two time points (2010 and 2018). RESULTS Sixty-eight living liver donors (LLDs) completed validated surveys, with a mean follow-up of 11.5 ± 5.1 y. Per Donor Quality of Life Survey data, physical activity or strength was not impacted by LD in most patients. All respondents returned to school or employment, and 82.4% reported that LD had no impact on school or work performance. LD did not impact health insurability in 95.6% of donors, and only one patient experienced difficulty obtaining life insurance. Overall, 97.1% of respondents did not regret LD. Short-Form 36 survey-measured outcomes were similar between LLDs and the general U.S. POPULATION LLDs who responded in both 2010 and 2018 were followed for an overall average of 15.4 ± 2.4 y and HRQOL outcomes in these donors also remained statistically equivalent to U.S. population norms. CONCLUSIONS This study represents the longest postdonation follow-up and offers unique insight related to HRQOL in a highly diverse patient population. Although LLDs continue to maintain excellent HRQOL outcomes up to 20 y after donation, continued lifetime follow-up is required to accurately provide young, healthy potential donors with an accurate description of the risks that they may incur on aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad H Raza
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michelle H Kim
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Division of Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Li Ding
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Tse-Ling Fong
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Department of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Christian Romero
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Yuri Genyk
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Division of Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Linda Sher
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Division of Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Juliet Emamaullee
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Division of Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shi Y, Liu C, Zhang H, Huang Y, Sun M, Wang W, Shang S. Changes in the quality of life of living liver donors: A meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2020; 109:103586. [PMID: 32531567 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comprehending the physical, psychological, social benefits, and harm associated with liver donation is critical in promoting practices to maintain donors' long-term health. However, changes in quality of life among living liver donors pre- and post-donation have not been established. OBJECTIVE This meta-analysis of prospective longitudinal studies examined the quality of life changes among living liver donors pre- and post-donation. METHODS PubMed, Embase, CINHAL with full text, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses were mainly searched for full-text articles from inception till December 2018 to identify studies assessing the quality of life of living liver donors. The methodological quality of the included studies was examined. The quality of life post-donation at five assessment points, ≤1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and ≥ 24 months were compared with the pre-donation, respectively. RESULTS The search yielded 2215 records, and a total of 15 articles (13 studies) with 715 donors were included in this meta-analysis. Physical functioning scores at ≤1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and ≥24 months post-donation were significantly lower than pre-donation [overall standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.67, 95% CI: -0.86, -0.49; p ≤]. Significantly higher level of pain was found at 3-month post-donation (SMD, -1.05; 95% CI: -1.26, -0.85; p < 0.00001). Also, a significantly higher level of anxiety was found at 3-month post-donation (SMD, -0.29; 95%CI: -0.51, -0.07; p = 0.01), but there were no significant changes in general psychological state and depression. A significant reduction in donors' social quality of life (SMD, -2.61; 95%CI: -4.75, 0.48; p = 0.02) was found at ≤1-month post-donation, and recovery to pre-donation levels occurred at 3 months post-donation. CONCLUSIONS Living liver donation was associated with a decline in physical functioning, which was sustained for longer than 2 years post-donation. Impaired social and psychological quality of life affected donors for 1-3 months after their donation. The quality of life of living liver donors has become a pressing issue requiring more attention from doctors and nurses within the transplant team. However, multicenter, prospective, and longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the long-term safety of living liver donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuexian Shi
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| | - Chunxia Liu
- Department of urinary surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, 100161, Beijing, China
| | - Haiming Zhang
- Liver Transplantation Center; Clinical Center for Pediatric Liver Transplantation; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
| | - Yaqi Huang
- School of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Meng Sun
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Wenru Wang
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Shaomei Shang
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Raza MH, Aziz H, Kaur N, Lo M, Sher L, Genyk Y, Emamaullee J. Global experience and perspective on anonymous nondirected live donation in living donor liver transplantation. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e13836. [PMID: 32154620 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Revised: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Anonymous nondirected living liver donation (ANLLD), sometimes referred to as "altruistic" donation, occurs when a biologically unrelated person comes forward to donate a portion of his/her liver to a transplant candidate who is unknown to the donor. Here, we explore the current status of ANLLD with special consideration of published reports; US experience; impact on donor psychosocial outcomes; barriers to donation; and current global trends with respect to ethical considerations. Between 1998 and 2019, 105 anonymous nondirected living liver donor (ND-LLD) transplants have been documented in the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Sixteen donors (15%) were reported to experience a postoperative complication. Currently, 89 donors remain alive (85%), 16 (15%) have unknown status, and none are confirmed deceased. Although there are only a handful of case series, these data suggest that ANLLD is a feasible option. While there are no liver-specific data, studies involving anonymous nondirected kidney donors suggest that anonymous donation does not adversely impact psychosocial outcomes in donors or recipients. There are substantial financial burdens and ethical considerations related to ANLLD. Further studies are required to assess donor demographics, psychosocial motivations, long-term health-related quality of life, and financial impact of ANLLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad H Raza
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Hassan Aziz
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Navpreet Kaur
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Division of Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mary Lo
- Department of Preventative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Linda Sher
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Division of Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yuri Genyk
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Division of Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Juliet Emamaullee
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Division of Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Shizuku M, Kamei H, Kimura H, Kurata N, Jobara K, Yoshizawa A, Ishizuka K, Okada A, Kishi S, Ozaki N, Ogura Y. Clinical Features and Long-Term Outcomes of Living Donors of Liver Transplantation Who Developed Psychiatric Disorders. Ann Transplant 2020; 25:e918500. [PMID: 32001667 PMCID: PMC7011571 DOI: 10.12659/aot.918500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the field of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), it is important to ensure donor's psychological well-being. We report on clinical features and long-term outcomes of LDLT donors who developed psychiatric disorders after their donor operations. Additionally, we compare patient backgrounds, as well as surgical and perioperative aspects between LDLT donors with and without postoperative psychiatric complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between November 1998 and March 2018, we identified 254 LDLT donors at our hospital. Among these, we investigated those who had newly developed psychiatric complications and required psychiatric treatment after donor operation. RESULTS The median duration of follow-up was 4 years. Sixty-five donors were lost to follow-up. Eight donors (3.1%) developed postoperative psychiatric complications, including major depressive disorder in 4, panic disorder in 2, conversion disorder and panic disorder in 1, and adjustment disorder in 1. The median duration from donor surgery to psychiatric diagnosis was 104.5 days (range, 12 to 657 days) and the median treatment duration was 18 months (range, 3 to 168 months). Of those, 3 donors required psychiatric treatment over 10 years, and 4 donors remained under treatment. The duration of hospital stay after donor operation was significantly longer and perioperative complications with Clavien classification greater than grade IIIa were more frequent in donors with psychiatric complications than in those without psychiatric complications (P=0.02 and P=0.006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment for psychiatric disorders by psychiatrists and psychologists are important during LDLT donor follow-up. Minimization of physiological complications might be important to prevent postoperative psychiatric complications in LDLT donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masato Shizuku
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.,Department of Transplantation and Endocrine Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hideya Kamei
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Kimura
- Department of Psychiatry, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Nobuhiko Kurata
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Kanta Jobara
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Atsushi Yoshizawa
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Kanako Ishizuka
- Department of Psychiatry, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Aoi Okada
- Department of Psychiatry, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shinichi Kishi
- Department of Psychiatry, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Norio Ozaki
- Department of Psychiatry, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Ogura
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Psychosocial dimensions of hand transplantation: lessons learned from solid organ transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2019; 24:705-713. [PMID: 31689261 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The present review examines psychosocial factors emerging as predictive of clinical outcomes among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, with possible extensions to vascular composite allograft (VCA) and hand transplantation, in particular. The Chauvet Workgroup report and International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus guidelines are used to delineate areas of commonality between SOT and VCA, as well as unique features contributing to post-VCA psychosocial risk. RECENT FINDINGS Increasing evidence suggests that depression, cognitive function, and other posttransplant psychosocial factors consistently associate with clinical risk in SOT. However, the mechanisms precipitating these psychosocial risk factors are likely diverse in their cause, with large individual differences across SOT and VCA. Transdiagnostic dimensions may serve as mechanistic factors, increasing the risk of adverse clinical outcomes and suggesting potential treatment strategies for risk mitigation. Psychosocial dimensions including psychological flexibility, self-efficacy, and posttraumatic growth are discussed as potential contributory factors. SUMMARY Psychosocial factors hold importance in predicting posttransplant clinical outcomes. Emerging transdiagnostic factors may provide insight into mechanisms and potential treatments.
Collapse
|
22
|
Toniutto P, Bitetto D, Fornasiere E, Fumolo E. Challenges and future developments in liver transplantation. MINERVA GASTROENTERO 2018; 65:136-152. [PMID: 30303340 DOI: 10.23736/s1121-421x.18.02529-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) has become the treatment of choice for a wide range of liver diseases in both adult and pediatric patients. Until recently, the largest proportion of LT in adults, were performed in patients with hepatitis C (HCV) related cirrhosis. The recent availability of safe and effective direct antiviral agents to cure HCV infection in almost all patients whatever the HCV genotype and severity of liver disease, will reduce the need for LT in this category of recipients. Thus, it is presumed that in the next 1 to 2 decades HCV related liver disease will diminish substantially, whereas non-alcoholic steato-hepatitis (NASH) will correspondingly escalate as an indication for LT. The greatest challenges facing LT remain the limited supply of donor organs, and the need for chronic immunosuppression, which represent the true obstacles to the greater application and durable success of the LT procedure. This review aimed to highlight, in different sections, the main open issues and future developments in LT. These will be focused to explore current and future strategies to maximize the use of limited organs, to offer an update on potential new approaches to immunosuppression and to imagine new indications for LT when the number of patients awaiting transplants for HCV related liver disease is reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierluigi Toniutto
- Unit of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy -
| | - Davide Bitetto
- Unit of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Ezio Fornasiere
- Unit of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Elisa Fumolo
- Unit of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Butt Z, DiMartini AF, Liu Q, Simpson MA, Smith AR, Zee J, Gillespie BW, Holtzman S, Ladner D, Olthoff K, Fisher RA, Hafliger S, Freise CE, Mandell MS, Sherker AH, Dew MA. Fatigue, Pain, and Other Physical Symptoms of Living Liver Donors in the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study. Liver Transpl 2018; 24:1221-1232. [PMID: 29698577 PMCID: PMC6153054 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Little is known about living liver donors' perceptions of their physical well-being following the procedure. We collected data on donor fatigue, pain, and other relevant physical outcomes as part of the prospective, multicenter Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study consortium. A total of 271 (91%) of 297 eligible donors were interviewed at least once before donation and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after donation using validated measures when available. Repeated measures regression models were used to identify potential predictors of worse physical outcomes. We found that donors reported more fatigue immediately after surgery that improved by 2 years after donation, but not to predonation levels. A similar pattern was seen across a number of other physical outcomes. Abdominal or back pain and interference from their pain were rated relatively low on average at all study points. However, 21% of donors did report clinically significant pain at some point during postdonation study follow-up. Across multiple outcomes, female donors, donors whose recipients died, donors with longer hospital stays after surgery, and those whose families discouraged donation were at risk for worse physical well-being outcomes. In conclusion, although not readily modifiable, we have identified risk factors that may help identify donors at risk for worse physical outcomes for targeted intervention. Liver Transplantation 00 000-000 2018 AASLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeeshan Butt
- Departments of Medical Social Sciences, Surgery, & Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Northwestern University, Chicago IL
| | - Andrea F. DiMartini
- Departments of Psychiatry, Psychology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Clinical and Translational Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA
| | - Qian Liu
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Mary Ann Simpson
- Department of Transplantation, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA
| | - Abigail R. Smith
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI,Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jarcy Zee
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Susan Holtzman
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC
| | - Daniela Ladner
- Departments of Medical Social Sciences, Surgery, & Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Northwestern University, Chicago IL
| | - Kim Olthoff
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Robert A. Fisher
- Division of Transplantation, The Transplant Institute Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA
| | | | - Chris E. Freise
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Averell H. Sherker
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Mary Amanda Dew
- Departments of Psychiatry, Psychology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Clinical and Translational Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA
| |
Collapse
|