Protocol Biopsies in Patients With Subclinical De Novo Donor-specific Antibodies After Kidney Transplantation: A Multicentric Study

Blood Gene Signature as a Biomarker for Subclinical Kidney Allograft Rejection: Where Are We?

The observation decades ago that inflammatory injuries because of an alloimmune response might be present even in the absence of concomitant clinical impairment in allograft function conduced to the later definition of subclinical rejection. Many studies have investigated the different subclinical rejections defined according to the Banff classification (subclinical T cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection), overall concluding that these episodes worsened long-term allograft function and survival. These observations led several transplant teams to perform systematic protocolar biopsies to anticipate treatment of rejection episodes and possibly prevent allograft loss. Paradoxically, the invasive characteristics and associated logistics of such procedures paved the way to investigate noninvasive biomarkers (urine and blood) of subclinical rejection. Among them, several research teams proposed a blood gene signature developed from cohort studies, most of which achieved excellent predictive values for the occurrence of subclinical rejection, mainly antibody-mediated rejection. Interestingly, although all identified genes relate to immune subsets and pathways involved in rejection pathophysiology, very few transcripts are shared among these sets of genes, highlighting the heterogenicity of such episodes and the difficult but mandatory need for external validation of such tools. Beyond this, their application and value in clinical practice remain to be definitively demonstrated in both biopsy avoidance and prevention of clinical rejection episodes. Their combination with other biomarkers, either epidemiological or biological, could contribute to a more accurate picture of a patient's risk of rejection and guide clinicians in the follow-up of kidney transplant recipients.

HLA class, calcineurin inhibitor levels, and the risk of graft failure in kidney recipients with de novo donor-specific antibodies

Introduction

De novo donor-specific HLA antibody (dnDSA) are associated with poor outcomes. Whether this observation applies to both HLA class I and II dnDSA remains unclear.

Methods

We studied 1236 consecutive kidney recipients who had routine anti-HLA antibody surveillance post-transplant.

Results

During the screening period, 55/1236 (4.4%) patients developed dnDSA: 18 (33%) HLA-I only, 33 (60%) HLA-II only, and 4 (7%) both classes. Thirty patients experienced graft loss at a median of 39 months after dnDSA detection: 9/18 (50%) HLA-I only, 17/33 (52%) HLA-II only, and 4/4 (100%) both classes. A control group was created by matching patients with dnDSA to patients who did not develop DSA and had a functioning graft at the time of dnDSA detection in their respective cases. Compared with these controls, the risk estimates of graft loss were similar between patients with HLA-I only and HLA-II only dnDSA (aHR [95% CI] 2.7 [1.1-6.6], p=0.04 and 3.1 [1.5-6.6], p<0.01 respectively). Additionally, the risk of graft loss decreased with increasing CNI trough levels following dnDSA detection (aHR 0.7 [0.6-0.9] for each increase in 1 ng/mL, p=0.02).

Conclusions

The prognosis of patients with dnDSA is similar regardless of the HLA class specificity. Lower calcineurin inhibitor levels predict graft loss in such patients.

Perspective for Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: Defining Context of Use and Clinical Implications

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a major cause of graft failure limiting long-term graft survival after kidney transplantation. Current diagnostic strategy to detect AMR is suboptimal and requires further improvement. Previously suggested treatment regimens for AMR could not demonstrate efficacy, however novel therapeutic agents are currently under investigation. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a novel non-invasive biomarker for allograft injury, that has been mainly studied in the context of rejection. Its short-half-life in circulation and injury-dependent release are its key advantages that contribute to its superior diagnostic accuracy, compared to traditional biomarkers. Moreover, previous studies showed that dd-cfDNA-release is well-linked to histological and molecular features of AMR, and thus able to reflect real-time injury. Further observations suggest that dd-cfDNA can be used as a suitable screening tool for early detection of AMR in patients with donor-specific-anti-HLA-antibodies (DSA), as well as for monitoring AMR activity after anti-rejection treatment. The weight of evidence suggests that the integration of dd-cfDNA in the graft surveillance of patients with AMR, or those suspicious of AMR (e.g., due to the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA-antibodies) has an added value and might have a positive impact on outcomes in this specific cohort.

25-hydroxyvitamin D sufficiency is associated with lower de novo anti-HLA donor specific antibody and better kidney transplant outcomes

T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR), de novo anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs) and ensuing antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) reduce kidney transplantation (KT) survival. The immunomodulatory effects of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] could be beneficial for KT outcomes. We aimed to evaluating the association between 25(OH)D levels, the development of dnDSAs, clinical TCMR and ABMR, and graft survival. This single center retrospective study included 253 KT recipients (KTRs) transplanted without preformed DSA between 2010 and 2013. We measured 25(OH)D in successive serum samples: at KT (M0) and M12 for the entire cohort, and additionally at M24 and/or M36 when sera were available. We assessed graft outcomes up to 5 years post-KT. The proportion of KTRs having sufficient 25(OH)D at KT (M0) was high (81.4%) and then dropped at M12 (71.1%). KTRs with sufficient 25(OH)D at M0 experienced less clinical TCMR (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.19-0.88 in multivariate analysis). A sufficient 25(OH)D at M12 was independently associated with a longer dnDSA-free survival (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.17-0.69). There was no association between 25(OH)D and clinical AMBR. Studying the KTRs with 25(OH)D measurements at M12, M24 and M36 (n = 203), we showed that 25(OH)D sufficiency over the 3 first-years post-KT was associated with a longer graft survival in multivariate analyses (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22-0.70). To our knowledge, this study is the first showing an association between 25(OH)D sufficiency post-KT and dnDSA occurrence in KTRs. Moreover, we reinforce previously published data showing an association between 25(OH)D, TCMR and graft survival in KT.

Mechanism and treatment for chronic antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients

Chronic antibody-mediated rejection of kidney transplantation is a major cause of late-stage graft loss. Donor-specific antibodies are the main cause of antibody-mediated rejection; in particular, de novo donor-specific antibodies are a risk factor for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection. The level of de novo donor-specific antibodies tends to increase with time throughout long-term graft survival. Donor-specific antibodies induce humoral rejection through complement activation, which results in tissue injury and coagulation. Additionally, complement activation promotes the migration of inflammatory cells through the innate immune response, causing endothelial injury. This inflammatory response may cause persistent glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis, leading to fixed pathological lesions that impair graft function. No treatment has been established for chronic antibody-mediated rejection, a condition in which antibody-mediated rejection becomes irreversible. Thus, antibody-mediated rejection must be detected and treated while it is still reversible. In this review, we discuss the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies and the mechanisms leading to chronic antibody-mediated rejection and summarize the current treatment options and the latest biomarkers for detecting chronic antibody-mediated rejection at an earlier stage.

The Clinical Utility of Post-Transplant Monitoring of Donor-Specific Antibodies in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients: A Consensus Report With Guideline Statements for Clinical Practice

Solid phase immunoassays improved the detection and determination of the antigen-specificity of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). The widespread use of SPI in kidney transplantation also introduced new clinical dilemmas, such as whether patients should be monitored for DSA pre- or post-transplantation. Pretransplant screening through SPI has become standard practice and DSA are readily determined in case of suspected rejection. However, DSA monitoring in recipients with stable graft function has not been universally established as standard of care. This may be related to uncertainty regarding the clinical utility of DSA monitoring as a screening tool. This consensus report aims to appraise the clinical utility of DSA monitoring in recipients without overt signs of graft dysfunction, using the Wilson & Junger criteria for assessing the validity of a screening practice. To assess the evidence on DSA monitoring, the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a dedicated workgroup, comprised of experts in transplantation nephrology and immunology, to review relevant literature. Guidelines and statements were developed during a consensus conference by Delphi methodology that took place in person in November 2022 in Prague. The findings and recommendations of the workgroup on subclinical DSA monitoring are presented in this article.

Subclinical rejection-free diagnostic after kidney transplantation using blood gene expression

We previously established a six-gene-based blood score associated with operational tolerance in kidney transplantation which was decreased in patients developing anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Herein, we aimed to confirm that this score is associated with immunological events and risk of rejection. We measured this using quantitative PCR (qPCR) and NanoString methods from an independent multicenter cohort of 588 kidney transplant recipients with paired blood samples and biopsies at one year after transplantation validating its association with pre-existing and de novo DSA. From 441 patients with protocol biopsy, there was a significant decrease of the score of tolerance in 45 patients with biopsy-proven subclinical rejection (SCR), a major threat associated with pejorative allograft outcomes that prompted an SCR score refinement. This refinement used only two genes, AKR1C3 and TCL1A, and four clinical parameters (previous experience of rejection, previous transplantation, sex of recipient and tacrolimus uptake). This refined SCR score was able to identify patients unlikely to develop SCR with a C-statistic of 0.864 and a negative predictive value of 98.3%. The SCR score was validated in an external laboratory, with two methods (qPCR and NanoString), and on 447 patients from an independent and multicenter cohort. Moreover, this score allowed reclassifying patients with discrepancies between the DSA presence and the histological diagnosis of antibody mediated rejection unlike kidney function. Thus, our refined SCR score could improve detection of SCR for closer and noninvasive monitoring, allowing early treatment of SCR lesions notably for patients DSA-positive and during lowering of immunosuppressive treatment.

Clinical recommendations for posttransplant assessment of anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) donor-specific antibodies: A Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk consensus document

Although anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are commonly measured in clinical practice and their relationship with transplant outcome is well established, clinical recommendations for anti-HLA antibody assessment are sparse. Supported by a careful and critical review of the current literature performed by the Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 working group, this consensus report provides clinical practice recommendations in kidney, heart, lung, and liver transplantation based on expert assessment of quality and strength of evidence. The recommendations address 3 major clinical problems in transplantation and include guidance regarding posttransplant DSA assessment and application to diagnostics, prognostics, and therapeutics: (1) the clinical implications of positive posttransplant DSA detection according to DSA status (ie, preformed or de novo), (2) the relevance of posttransplant DSA assessment for precision diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection and for treatment management, and (3) the relevance of posttransplant DSA for allograft prognosis and risk stratification. This consensus report also highlights gaps in current knowledge and provides directions for clinical investigations and trials in the future that will further refine the clinical utility of posttransplant DSA assessment, leading to improved transplant management and patient care.

Unraveling complexity of antibody-mediated rejections, the mandatory way towards an accurate diagnosis and a personalized treatment

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) remains one of the most challenging issues after organ transplantation and particularly after kidney transplantation. Despite many progresses during the last decade, ABMR is still the main cause of kidney graft loss and this all over the post- transplant period. In this review, we describe the recent knowledge about molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in ABMR. We focused our report on the role of the complement pathway in the process of ABMR and we give some insights into the role of inflammatory cells, NK lymphocytes and the role of endothelial cells. We further describe the potential role of non-HLA antibodies, of which the importance has been increasingly emphasized in recent years. Overall, this report could be of interest for all physicians who are working in the field of organ transplantation or who are working in the field of immunology. It gives essential information to understand new diagnosis advances and further therapeutic approaches. Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is the leading cause of graft failure ([1,2]). In contrast to T-cell mediated rejection usually sensitive to steroids, active ABMR remains a therapeutic challenge. ABMR diagnosis relies on the presence of renal injuries and donor-specific antibodies (DSA) (HLA and non HLA antibodies) with sometimes the evidence of interaction between DSA and graft endothelium. Regularly revised during expert conferences, ABMR definition is currently categorized as active or chronic active. [3] The emergence of validated molecular assays targeting a better phenotyping of ABMR and the recent advances regarding the detrimental effect of DSA directed against minor antigens open the way to a better assessment of the heterogeneity of ABMR. In this review, we will address new aspects of ABMR regarding its mechanisms, diagnosis and treatments.

The Clinical Impact of Anti-HLA Donor Specific Antibody Detection Through First Year Screening on Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients

Anti-HLA Donor Specific Antibody (DSA) detection post kidney transplant has been associated with adverse outcomes, though the impact of early DSA screening on stable patients remain unclear. We analyzed impact of DSA detection through screening in 1st year stable patients (n = 736) on subsequent estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), death censored graft survival (DCGS), and graft failure (graft loss including return to dialysis or re-transplant, patient death, or eGFR < 20 ml/min at last follow up). Patients were grouped using 1st year screening into DSA+ (Class I, II; n = 131) or DSA- (n = 605). DSA+ group were more DR mismatched (p = 0.02), more sensitized (cPRA ≥90%, p = 0.002), less Caucasian (p = 0.04), and had less pre-emptive (p = 0.04) and more deceased donor transplants (p = 0.03). DSA+ patients had similar eGFR (54.8 vs. 53.8 ml/min/1.73 m², p = 0.56), DCGS (91% vs. 94%, p = 0.30), and graft failure free survival (76% vs. 82%, p = 0.11). DSA timing and type did not impact survival. Among those with a protocol biopsy (n = 515), DSA detected on 1st year screening was a predictor for graft failure on multivariate analysis (1.91, 95% CI 1.03-3.55, p = 0.04). Overall, early DSA detection in stable patients was an independent risk factor for graft failure, though only among those who underwent a protocol biopsy.

Validation and clinical outcome in assessing donor-derived cell-free DNA monitoring insights of kidney allografts with longitudinal surveillance (ADMIRAL) study

The use of routine monitoring of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) after kidney transplant may allow clinicians to identify subclinical allograft injury and intervene prior to development of clinically evident graft injury. To evaluate this, data from 1092 kidney transplant recipients monitored for dd-cfDNA over a three year period was analyzed to assess the association of dd-cfDNA with histologic evidence of allograft rejection. Elevation of dd-cfDNA (0.5% or more) was significantly correlated with clinical and subclinical allograft rejection. dd-cfDNA values of 0.5% or more were associated with a nearly three-fold increase in risk development of de novo donor specific antibodies (hazard ratio 2.71) and were determined to be elevated a median of 91 days (inter quartile range of 30-125 days) ahead of donor specific antibody identification. Persistently elevated dd-cfDNA (more than one result above the 0.5% threshold) predicted over a 25% decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate over three years (hazard ratio 1.97). Therefore, routine monitoring of dd-cfDNA allowed early identification of clinically important graft injury. Biomarker monitoring complemented histology and traditional laboratory surveillance strategies as a prognostic marker and risk-stratification tool post-transplant. Thus, persistently low dd-cfDNA levels may accurately identify allograft quiescence, or absence of injury, paving the way for personalization of immunosuppression trials.

The clinical value of donor-derived cell-free DNA measurements in kidney transplantation

Early diagnosis is critical to minimizing the damage rejection can do to the transplanted kidney. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) represents non-encapsulated fragmented DNA that is continuously shed into the bloodstream from the allograft undergoing injury, with a half-life of about 30 min. This article reviews the available evidence regarding the diagnostic value of dd-cfDNA in kidney transplantation, as a result of which two assays, Allosure and Prospera, have garnered Medicare approval. We provide information on important scenarios and contexts including antibody-mediated rejection, T-cell mediated rejection, pre-test probability of rejection, timing of the test, repeat transplants, and background cell-free DNA levels to help our understanding of the test characteristics and utility of these assays in clinical practice. Data on multimodality assays including gene expression profiles and serial monitoring of dd-cfDNA in high risk situations are emerging.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Recurrent Primary Disease: Two Main Obstacles in Abdominal Kidney, Liver, and Pancreas Transplants

The advances in acute phase care have firmly established the practice of organ transplantation in the last several decades. Then, the next issues that loom large in the field of transplantation include antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and recurrent primary disease. Acute ABMR is a daunting hurdle in the performance of organ transplantation. The recent progress in desensitization and preoperative monitoring of donor-specific antibodies enables us to increase positive outcomes. However, chronic active ABMR is one of the most significant problems we currently face. On the other hand, recurrent primary disease is problematic for many recipients. Notably, some recipients, unfortunately, lost their vital organs due to this recurrence. Although some progress has been achieved in these two areas, many other factors remain largely obscure. In this review, these two topics will be discussed in light of recent discoveries.

Targeting T Follicular Helper Cells to Control Humoral Allogeneic Immunity

Humoral allogeneic immunity driven by anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) significantly impede prolonged survival of organ allografts after transplantation. Although the importance of T follicular helper (TFH) cells in controlling antibody responses has been long established, their role in directing donor-specific antibody generation leading to AMR was only recently appreciated in the clinical setting of organ transplantation. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the current knowledge on the biology of human TFH cells as well as their circulating counterparts and describe their pivotal role in driving humoral alloimmunity. In addition, we discuss the intrinsic effects of current induction therapies and maintenance immunosuppressive drugs as well as of biotherapies on TFH cells and provide future directions and novel opportunities of biotherapeutic targeting of TFH cells that have the potential of bringing the prophylactic and curative treatments of AMR toward personalized and precision medicine.

Pure T-cell mediated rejection following kidney transplant according to response to treatment

The focus of studies on kidney transplantation (KT) has largely shifted from T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). However, there are still cases of pure acute TCMR in histological reports, even after a long time following transplant. We thus evaluated the impact of pure TCMR on graft survival (GS) according to treatment response. We also performed molecular diagnosis using a molecular microscope diagnostic system on a separate group of 23 patients. A total of 63 patients were divided into non-responders (N = 22) and responders (N = 44). Non-response to rejection treatment was significantly associated with the following factors: glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at biopsy, ΔGFR, TCMR within one year, t score, and IF/TA score. We also found that non-responder vs. responder (OR = 3.31; P = 0.036) and lower GFR at biopsy (OR = 0.56; P = 0.026) were independent risk factors of graft failure. The responders had a significantly superior overall GS rate compared with the non-responders (P = 0.004). Molecular assessment showed a good correlation with histologic diagnosis in ABMR, but not in TCMR. Solitary TCMR was a significant risk factor of graft failure in patients who did not respond to rejection treatment.

The Problem of Subclinical Antibody-mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

Defined as histologic evidence of rejection on a protocol biopsy in the absence of kidney dysfunction, subclinical rejection has garnered attention since the 1990s. The major focus of much of this research, however, has been subclinical T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). Herein, we review the literature on subclinical antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which may occur with either preexisting donor-specific antibodies (DSA) or upon the development of de novo DSA (dnDSA). In both situations, subsequent kidney function and graft survival are compromised. Thus, we recommend protocol biopsy routinely within the first year with preexisting DSA and at the initial detection of dnDSA. In those with positive biopsies, baseline immunosuppression should be maximized, any associated TCMR treated, and adherence stressed, but it remains uncertain if antibody-reduction treatment should be initiated. Less invasive testing of blood for donor DNA or gene profiling may have a role in follow-up of those with negative initial biopsies. If a protocol biopsy is positive in the absence of detectable HLA-DSA, it also remains to be determined whether non-HLA-DSA should be screened for either in particular or on a genome-wide basis and how these patients should be treated. Randomized controlled trials are clearly needed.

De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies reduce graft survival rates and increase the risk of kidney transplant rejection: A single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

We investigated the impact of de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (dnDSAs) on long-term death-censored graft survival and renal allograft rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

The sample for this retrospective cohort study comprised 121 recipients of kidney transplants with negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatches to their deceased donors. Recipients were divided into two groups: dnDSAs+ (n = 31) and dnDSAs- (n = 90). We evaluated rejection and long-term graft survival rates in the recipients along with pathologic changes in the transplanted kidneys.

RESULTS

DnDSAs were identified in 31/121 patients (25.6%). The graft survival rate in the dnDSAs+ group was 87.1% (27/31) and that of the dnDSAs- group was 97.8% (88/90). The dnDSAs+ group had lower graft survival rates than patients without dnDSAs (p = 0.007). There was no difference in the graft survival rates between patients with high DSA mean fluorescence intensity (≥4000) and those with low intensity (<4000) (p = 0.669). There was also no difference in the graft survival rates of patients with HLA class I, II, and I + II dnDSAs (p = 0.571). The presence of dnDSA in serum was associated with a higher incidence of antibody- and T-cell-mediated rejection (p < 0.0001). Banff scores for arterial fibrointimal and arteriolar hyalin, thickening as well as C4d deposition differed for the dnDSAs+ and dnDSAs- groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DnDSAs were found to be associated with decreased long-term graft survival rates and increased rejection rates, often accompanied by C4d deposition.

Cyclic Helix B Peptide Prolongs Skin Allograft Survival via Inhibition of B Cell Immune Responses in a Murine Model

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) represents a major cause of allograft dysfunction and results in allograft failure in solid organ transplantation. Cyclic helix B peptide (CHBP) is a novel erythropoietin-derived peptide that ameliorated renal allograft rejection in a renal transplantation model. However, its effect on AMR remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effect of CHBP on AMR using a secondary allogeneic skin transplantation model, which was created by transplanting skin from BALB/c mice to C57BL/6 mice with or without CHBP treatment. A secondary syngeneic skin transplantation model, involving transplantation from C57BL/6 mice to C57BL/6 mice, was also created to act as a control. Skin graft rejection, CD19⁺ B cell infiltration in the skin allograft, the percentages of splenic plasma cells, germinal center (GC) B cells, and Tfh cells, the serum levels of donor specific antibodies (DSAs), and NF-κB signaling in splenocytes were analyzed. Skin allograft survival was significantly prolonged in the CHBP group compared to the allogeneic group. CHBP treatment also significantly reduced the CD19⁺ B cell infiltration in the skin allograft, decreased the percentages of splenic plasma cells, GC B cells, and Tfh cells, and ameliorated the increase in the serum DSA level. At a molecular level, CHBP downregulated P100, RelB, and P52 in splenocytes. CHBP prolonged skin allograft survival by inhibiting AMR, which may be mediated by inhibition of NF-κB signaling to suppress B cell immune responses, thereby decreasing the DSA level.

Intensity of de novo DSA detected by Immucor Lifecodes assay and C3d fixing antibodies are not predictive of subclinical ABMR after Kidney Transplantation

De novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) are associated with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and allograft loss. We tested Immucor* (IM) Luminex Single-antigen beads (LSAB) assay and C3d-fixing antibodies in the setting of dnDSA and subclinical (s) ABMR. This retrospective multicentric study included 123 patients biopsied because of the presence of subclinical de novo DSA detected by One Lamda* Labscreen (MFI > 1000). In 112 patients, sera of the day of the biopsy were available and tested in a central lab with IM Lifecodes LSAB and C3d fixing antibodies assays. In 16 patients (14.3%), no DSA was detected using Immucor test. In 96 patients, at least one DSA was determined with IM. Systematic biopsies showed active sABMR in 30 patients (31.2%), chronic active sABMR in 17 patients (17.7%) and no lesions of sABMR in 49 KT recipients (51%). Intensitity criteria (BCM, BCR and AD-BCR) of DSA were not statistically different between these 3 histological groups. The proportion of patients with C3d-fixing DSA was not statistically different between the 3 groups and did not offer any prognostic value regarding graft survival. Performing biopsy for dnDSA could not be guided by the intensity criteria of IM LSAB assay. C3d-fixing DSA do not offer added value.

Biopsy findings after detection of de novo donor-specific antibodies in renal transplant recipients: a single center experience

Background

De novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are associated with an increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection and a substantial reduction of allograft survival. We hypothesized that detection of DSA should prompt a biopsy even in the absence of proteinuria and loss of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). However, data on a population without proteinuria or loss of kidney function is scant, and this is the main novelty of our study design.

Methods

Single center retrospective analysis on biopsy findings after detection of de novo DSA. One-hundred-thirty-two kidney and pancreas-kidney transplant recipients were included. Eighty-four of these patients (63.6%) underwent allograft biopsy. At the time of biopsy n = 50 (59.5%) had a protein/creatinine ratio (PCR) > 300 mg/g creatinine and/or a loss of eGFR ≥ 10 ml/min in the previous 12 months, whereas 40.5% did not. Diagnosis of rejection was performed according to Banff criteria.

Results

Seventy-seven (91.7%) of the biopsies had signs of rejection (47.6% antibody mediated rejection (ABMR), 13.1% cellular, 20.2% combined, 10.7% borderline). Among subjects without proteinuria or loss of eGFR ≥ 10 ml/min/a (n = 34), 29 patients (85.3%) showed signs of rejection (44.1% antibody mediated (ABMR), 14.7% cellular, 11.8% combined, 14.7% borderline).

Conclusion

The majority of subjects with de novo DSA have histological signs of rejection, even in the absence of proteinuria and deterioration of graft function. Thus, it appears reasonable to routinely perform an allograft biopsy after the detection of de novo DSA.

Graphic abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40620-021-01040-y.

What happens after graft loss? A large, long-term, single-center observation

The number of patients returning to dialysis after graft failure increases. Surprisingly, little is known about the clinical and immunological outcomes of this cohort. We retrospectively analyzed 254 patients after kidney allograft loss between 1997 and 2017 and report clinical outcomes such as mortality, relisting, retransplantations, transplant nephrectomies, and immunization status. Of the 254 patients, 49% had died 5 years after graft loss, while 27% were relisted, 14% were on dialysis and not relisted, and only 11% were retransplanted 5 years after graft loss. In the complete observational period, 111/254 (43.7%) patients were relisted. Of these, 72.1% of patients were under 55 years of age at time of graft loss and only 13.5% of patients were ≥65 years. Age at graft loss was associated with relisting in a logistic regression analysis. In the complete observational period, 42 patients (16.5%) were retransplanted. Only 4 of those (9.5%) were ≥65 years at time of graft loss. Nephrectomy had no impact on survival, relisting, or development of dnDSA. Patients after allograft loss have a high overall mortality. Immunization contributes to long waiting times. Only a very limited number of patients are retransplanted especially when ≥65 years at time of graft loss.

Screening strategy for de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies beyond the first year after kidney transplantation: Personalized or "one size fits all"?

Screening for de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) after kidney transplantation is widely recommended. The aim of this single-center, cross-sectional study was to investigate the frequency of therapeutic interventions triggered by de novo DSA screening. We included 464 patients screened for de novo DSA at annual visits after a median of 5 years post-transplant (range 1 to 19 years). Overall, de novo DSAs were detected in 55/464 patients (11.9%) with a stepwise increase of the prevalence from 4.9% at 1 year post-transplant to 18.9% at >10 years post-transplant. Subsequent allograft biopsies were performed in 24/55 patients (44%). The main reasons to omit biopsies were good/stable allograft function and anticipated lack of clinical consequences (eg, relevant comorbidities). Rejection processes were detected in 16/24 biopsies (67%). Therapeutic interventions were made in 18/464 screened patients (3.9%) with a significantly higher rate in the youngest quartile of patients (≤48 years; 7.9%) compared to the middle 50% (49-67 years; 3%) and the oldest quartile (≥68 years; 1.7%) (P = .03). Our study suggests that the frequency of therapeutic interventions triggered by de novo DSA screening after kidney transplantation is overall low, but significantly higher in younger patients, arguing for a personalized, age-adapted de novo DSA screening strategy.

Urinary Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prediction of Acute Kidney Allograft Rejection: A Systematic Review

Noninvasive tools for diagnosis or prediction of acute kidney allograft rejection have been extensively investigated in recent years. Biochemical and molecular analyses of blood and urine provide a liquid biopsy that could offer new possibilities for rejection prevention, monitoring, and therefore, treatment. Nevertheless, these tools are not yet available for routine use in clinical practice. In this systematic review, MEDLINE was searched for articles assessing urinary biomarkers for diagnosis or prediction of kidney allograft acute rejection published in the last five years (from 1 January 2015 to 31 May 2020). This review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles providing targeted or unbiased urine sample analysis for the diagnosis or prediction of both acute cellular and antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection were included, analyzed, and graded for methodological quality with a particular focus on study design and diagnostic test accuracy measures. Urinary C-X-C motif chemokine ligands were the most promising and frequently studied biomarkers. The combination of precise diagnostic reference in training sets with accurate validation in real-life cohorts provided the most relevant results and exciting groundwork for future studies.