What Therapeutic Regimen Will Be Optimal for Initial Clinical Trials of Pig Organ Transplantation?

The Evolution of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Pig-to-Nonhuman Primate Organ Transplantation

An overview is provided of the evolution of strategies towards xenotransplantation during the past almost 40 years, focusing on advances in gene-editing of the organ-source pigs, pre-transplant treatment of the recipient, immunosuppressive protocols, and adjunctive therapy. Despite initial challenges, including hyperacute rejection resulting from natural (preformed) antibody binding and complement activation, significant progress has been made through gene editing of the organ-source pigs and refinement of immunosuppressive regimens. Major steps were the identification and deletion of expression of the three known glycan xenoantigens on pig vascular endothelial cells, the transgenic expression of human "protective" proteins, e.g., complement-regulatory, coagulation-regulatory, and anti-inflammatory proteins, and the administration of an immunosuppressive regimen based on blockade of the CD40/CD154 T cell co-stimulation pathway. Efforts to address systemic inflammation followed. The synergy between gene editing and judicious immunomodulation appears to largely prevent graft rejection and is associated with a relatively good safety profile. Though there remains an incidence of severe or persistent proteinuria (nephrotic syndrome) in a minority of cases. This progress offers renewed hope for patients in need of life-saving organ transplants.

Modified CD40L-Activated B-Cell Proliferation Model for Validating the Suppressive Activity of CD40-CD154 Pathway Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

CD40-CD154 pathway inhibitors are considered indispensable immunosuppressive drugs in xenotransplantation. At present, novel anti-CD154 and anti-CD40 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are continuously being developed. It is important to establish a simple and efficient in vitro method to evaluate the effectiveness of these therapeutic mAbs.

METHODS

A modified CD40L-activated B-cell proliferation model was established using irradiated NIH/3T3 cells transfected with human CD40 ligand (hCD40L-NIH/3T3) as stimulator cells and human or rhesus monkey peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) as responder cells. After 8 days of culture, B-cell proliferation was detected by flow cytometry. Various concentrations of anti-CD40 or anti-CD154 mAbs were added to the co-culture system as an intervention. The inhibitory effects of anti-CD154 and anti-CD40 mAbs on the proliferation of B cells from humans and rhesus monkeys were studied and compared.

RESULTS

After 8 days of co-culture, the proliferation rate of B cells in both human and rhesus monkey PBMCs was more than 80%, and the expression of MHC-II and the co-stimulatory molecules CD80, CD86, and CD40 on B cells was significantly up-regulated. All three anti-CD154 mAbs showed a similar strong inhibitory effect on human B-cell proliferation, but the inhibitory effect on the proliferation of rhesus monkey B cells was weaker than that on human B cells, which showed a typical dose-dependent inhibition. The three anti-CD40 mAbs from different sources had different effects. One mAbs potently inhibited both human and monkey B-cell proliferation, whereas the other two mAbs exhibited strong or moderate inhibitory effects on human B-cell proliferation but had little inhibitory effect on monkey B-cell proliferation.

CONCLUSION

We have successfully established a modified CD40L-activated B-cell proliferation model for the in vitro evaluation of CD40-CD154 pathway inhibitors, which may provide important evidence for the selection of appropriate therapeutic antibodies and their dose determination for xenotransplantation.

How Much Will a Pig Organ Transplant Cost? A Preliminary Estimate of the Cost of Xenotransplantation Versus Allotransplantation in the USA

We reviewed the costs of organ allotransplantation and attempted to estimate the potential costs of xenotransplantation (based on the premise that, when clinically established, the results of pig organ xenotransplantation would be at least equal to those of allotransplantation). The care of patients with end-stage organ failure waiting for an allograft is expensive, particularly if chronic dialysis or mechanical support is required. Xenotransplantation has the potential to eliminate wait times for organ transplants, significantly reduce certain management costs, for example, chronic dialysis, and enable early transplantation before comorbidities develop or increase. The cost of the surgical procurement of a pig organ and its transplantation will be similar to that of allotransplantation, as will the cost of immunosuppressive therapy. The major "unknown" is the cost of purchasing a gene-edited pig organ, which is likely to be considerable. We conclude that there will be significant cost savings for the pretransplant care of an individual patient, but these may be offset by the cost of the gene-edited pig organ. However, the ready availability of an unlimited organ supply will greatly increase the number of transplants carried out each year, thus increasing the overall expenditure on transplantation.

The Time Has Come: The Case for Initiating Pilot Clinical Trials of Pig Kidney Xenotransplantation

In vitro studies indicate that kidney transplantation from gene-edited pigs in which expression of all three of the known glycan xenoantigens has been deleted may be more challenging in nonhuman primates (NHPs) than it will be in human recipients. Furthermore, pig-to-human xenotransplantation offers several other advantages - (i) the patient can communicate with the surgical team; (ii) recipient microbiological monitoring and environment will be clinical-grade; and (iii) sophisticated graft monitoring and imaging techniques, (v) therapeutic interventions, e.g., dialysis, plasmapheresis, and (v) intensive care can be deployed that are not easily available in NHP laboratory models. We suggest, therefore, that progress to develop safe, informative human clinical trials will be accelerated if pilot clinical cases are initiated. The selection of patients for kidney xenotransplantation can include those who are at high risk of dying imminently, e.g., those experiencing increasing vascular access challenges with no realistic alternative therapy available, and those who have been accepted onto the waitlist for an allograft, but who are unlikely ever to receive one. Patients with an increased risk of dying include those with (i) age >60 years, (ii) blood groups O or B, and (iii) diabetic nephropathy. UNOS data indicate that an average of 25 patients on the kidney waitlist in the USA die or are removed from the list every day (i.e., >9,000 each year). Given the improved xenograft survival observed in preclinical studies, we suggest that it is time to plan a small pilot clinical trial for healthy dialysis patients who understand the risks and potential benefits of kidney xenotransplantation.

Intensive Surveillance of Porcine-Rhesus Kidney Xenotransplant Using Different Ultrasound Techniques

BACKGROUND

Significant progress has been made in kidney xenotransplantation in the past few years, and this field is accelerating towards clinical translation. Therefore, surveillance of the xenograft with appropriate tools is of great importance. Ultrasonography has been widely used in kidney allotransplantation and served as an economical and non-invasive method to monitor the allograft. However, questions remain whether the ultrasonographic criteria established for human kidney allograft could also be applied in xenotransplantation.

METHODS

In the current study, we established a porcine-rhesus life sustaining kidney xenotransplantation model. The xenograft underwent intensive surveillance using gray-scale, colorful Doppler ultrasound as well as 2D shear wave elastography. The kidney growth, blood perfusion, and cortical stiffness were measured twice a day. These parameters were compared with the clinical data including urine output, chemistry, and pathological findings.

RESULTS

The observation continued for 16 days after transplantation. Decline of urine output and elevated serum creatinine were observed on POD9 and biopsy proven antibody-mediated rejection was seen on the same day. The xenograft underwent substantial growth, with the long axis length increased by 32% and the volume increased by threefold at the end of observation. The resistive index of the xenograft arteries elevated in response to rejection, together with impaired cortical perfusion, while the peak systolic velocity (PSV) was not compromised. The cortical stiffness also increased along with rejection.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the ultrasound findings of kidney xenograft shared similarities with those in allograft but possessed some unique features. A modified criteria needs to be established for further application of ultrasound in kidney xenotransplantation.

Ethical considerations in xenotransplantation of thoracic organs - a call for a debate on value based decisions

Xenotransplant covers a broad ethical territory and there are several ethical questions that have arisen in parallel with the technological advances that have allowed the first porcine transplants to occur. This brief communication highlights ethical considerations regarding heart and lung xenotransplantation, with an emphasis on unresolved value-based concerns in the field. The aim of this text is therefore to encourage the readers to consider the vast potential of this emerging technique to do good, but also the risk of doing harm, and to participate in a discussion. The list of questions presented here is not exhaustive but hopefully represents some of the questions that appear to be most pressing as the field advances. The focus is on the value-based, or ethical questions, not the questions related to the practical medical procedures.

Comparative Inhibitory Effects of Tacrolimus, Cyclosporine, and Rapamycin on Human Anti-Pig Xenogeneic Mixed Lymphocyte Reactions

BACKGROUND

Long-term immunosuppressive maintenance therapy is necessary to prevent the rejection of xenografts. However, it is still unclear which oral immunosuppressant is most suitable for pig-to-human xenotransplantation .

METHODS

A xenogeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) system was established using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from wildtype (WT) or GTKO/CMAHKO/β4GalNT2KO (TKO) pigs as stimulator cells and human PBMCs as responder cells. Various concentrations of tacrolimus (Tac), cyclosporine (CsA), or rapamycin (Rapa) were added to the MLR system as interventions. The inhibitory effects of the three immunosuppressants on the proliferation and cytokine production of human T cells were studied and compared. The inhibitory effect of anti-CD154 mAb alone or in combination with Tac/CsA/Rapa on xenoreactive MLR was also investigated.

RESULTS

PBMCs from both WT and TKO pigs stimulated significant proliferation of human T cells. Tac had a strong inhibitory effect on human T-cell proliferation stimulated by pig PBMCs. CsA inhibited human T-cell proliferation in a typical dose-dependent manner. When Tac and CsA concentrations reached 5 and 200 ng/mL, respectively, the proliferation rates of CD3+/CD4+/CD8+ T cells were reduced almost to a negative level. Even at high concentrations, Rapa had only a moderate inhibitory effect on xenogeneic MLR. The inhibitory effects of these three immunosuppressants on xenogeneic T-cell responses were further confirmed by the detection of CD25 expression and supernatant cytokines (IL-2, IL-6, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-17). Although anti-CD154 mAb monotherapy showed only moderate inhibitory effects on xenoreactive T-cell proliferation, low-dose anti-CD154 mAb combined with low-dose Tac, CSA, or Rapa could produce significant synergistic inhibitory effects.

CONCLUSION

Tac is more efficient than CsA or Rapa in inhibiting xenogeneic T-cell responses in vitro. If used in combination with anti-CD154 mAb, all the three immunosuppressants can achieve satisfactory synergistic inhibitory effects.

Developments in kidney xenotransplantation

The search for kidney xenografts that are appropriate for patients with end-stage renal disease has been ongoing since the beginning of the last century. The major cause of xenograft loss is hyperacute and acute rejection, and this has almost been overcome via scientific progress. The success of two pre-clinical trials of α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout porcine kidneys in brain-dead patients in 2021 triggered research enthusiasm for kidney xenotransplantation. This minireview summarizes key issues from an immunological perspective: the discovery of key xenoantigens, investigations into key co-stimulatory signal inhibition, gene-editing technology, and immune tolerance induction. Further developments in immunology, particularly immunometabolism, might help promote the long-term outcomes of kidney xenografts.

In vitro and in vivo immune assessments of genetically-engineered pig skin grafts in New World (squirrel) monkeys

Half a million patients in the USA alone require treatment for burns annually. Following an extensive burn, it may not be possible to provide sufficient autografts in a single setting. Genetic manipulations (GM) of pigs offer the possibility of reducing primate humoral and cellular rejection of pig skin xenografts and thus extending graft survival. We compared the survival of skin grafts from pigs with 9-GM with that of autografts and allografts in squirrel monkeys. Monitoring for rejection was by (1) macroscopic examination, (2) histopathological examination of skin biopsies, and (3) measurement of anti-monkey and anti-pig IgM and IgG antibodies. Autografts (n = 5) survived throughout the 28 days of follow-up without histopathological features of rejection. Median survival of allografts (n = 6) was 14 days and of pig xenografts (n = 12) 21 days. Allotransplantation was associated with an increase in anti-monkey IgM, but the anticipated subsequent rise in IgG had not yet occurred at the time of euthanasia. Pig grafts were associated with increases in anti-pig IgM and IgG. In all cases, histopathologic features of rejection were similar. 9-GM pig skin xenografts survive at least as long as monkey skin allografts (and trended to survive longer), suggesting that they are a realistic clinical option for the temporary treatment of burns. Although monkeys with pig skin grafts developed anti-pig IgM and IgG antibodies, these did not cross-react with monkey antigens, indicating that a primary 9-GM pig skin graft would not be detrimental to a subsequent monkey skin allograft.

Shooting for the moon: Genome editing for pig heart xenotransplantation

Gene-edited pigs could eventually provide organs that are safely and effectively protected from the human immune response without exogenous immunosuppression.

Genome editing technology has revolutionized heart xenotransplantation and made transplantation of bioengineered pig hearts into humans a possibility. This first clinical application resulted from a tremendous amount of research. Dramatic early attempts of clinical cardiac xenotransplantation during the last century paved the way to modern xenotransplantation using bioengineered pig hearts. It appears that such genome-edited hearts will be most suitable for neonates and infants because of their immature immune system. The bioengineered pig heart may also be used as a bridge to human heart transplantation, avoiding the risk of thromboembolic events of durable ventricular assist devises in these young children. It is also intriguing to think that bioengineered hearts using pigs as a host may result in a new source of donor hearts that would not evoke the human immune response and minimize, if not eliminate, the need for immunosuppression.

It this issue of the Journal, a group of experts led by Dr Cooper, whose personal work spans over 50 years of heart transplantation research, outline the current state of the genome editing of bioengineered hearts and discuss the prospects of clinical application.

Antibody-mediated rejection in xenotransplantation: Can it be prevented or reversed?

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is the commonest cause of failure of a pig graft after transplantation into an immunosuppressed nonhuman primate (NHP). The incidence of AMR compared to acute cellular rejection is much higher in xenotransplantation (46% vs. 7%) than in allotransplantation (3% vs. 63%) in NHPs. Although AMR in an allograft can often be reversed, to our knowledge there is no report of its successful reversal in a pig xenograft. As there is less experience in preventing or reversing AMR in models of xenotransplantation, the results of studies in patients with allografts provide more information. These include (i) depletion or neutralization of serum anti-donor antibodies, (ii) inhibition of complement activation, (iii) therapies targeting B or plasma cells, and (iv) anti-inflammatory therapy. Depletion or neutralization of anti-pig antibody, for example, by plasmapheresis, is effective in depleting antibodies, but they recover within days. IgG-degrading enzymes do not deplete IgM. Despite the expression of human complement-regulatory proteins on the pig graft, inhibition of systemic complement activation may be necessary, particularly if AMR is to be reversed. Potential therapies include (i) inhibition of complement activation (e.g., by IVIg, C1 INH, or an anti-C5 antibody), but some complement inhibitors are not effective in NHPs, for example, eculizumab. Possible B cell-targeted therapies include (i) B cell depletion, (ii) plasma cell depletion, (iii) modulation of B cell activation, and (iv) enhancing the generation of regulatory B and/or T cells. Among anti-inflammatory agents, anti-IL6R mAb and TNF blockers are increasingly being tested in xenotransplantation models, but with no definitive evidence that they reverse AMR. Increasing attention should be directed toward testing combinations of the above therapies. We suggest that treatment with a systemic complement inhibitor is likely to be most effective, possibly combined with anti-inflammatory agents (if these are not already being administered). Ultimately, it may require further genetic engineering of the organ-source pig to resolve the problem entirely, for example, knockout or knockdown of SLA, and/or expression of PD-L1, HLA E, and/or HLA-G.

Assessment of glomerular filtration and tubular secretion in baboons with life-supporting pig kidney grafts

With pig kidney xenotransplantation nearing clinical reality, it is imperative to measure pig kidney function in the graft recipients. Our aims were (i) to compare inulin clearance after a short intravenous (IV) bolus with steady-state inulin IV infusion, (ii) to use this method to measure the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and (iii) to determine the tubular secretory function using cefoxitin in a pig-to-baboon renal transplant model. A short IV infusion of inulin and cefoxitin were followed by a maintenance IV infusion of inulin over 5 h in seven healthy baboons, three healthy pigs, and five baboons after bilateral native nephrectomy and intra-abdominal pig renal transplantation. Blood and urine samples were collected. Serum and urinary inulin and serum cefoxitin concentrations measured by validated assays were used to calculate GFR and renal secretion. GFR calculated were similar by both methods. The body weight normalized total body clearance of inulin was similar in pigs and baboons despite differences in absolute clearances. Pig kidney transplanted into baboons provided similar clearance in baboons when normalized to baboon body weight and sustained filtration and secretory functions. The study documented that pig kidneys support the physiologic needs of baboons and are likely to support human recipients as well.

Milestones on the path to clinical pig organ xenotransplantation

Progress in pig organ xenotransplantation has been made largely through (1) genetic engineering of the organ-source pig to protect its tissues from the human innate immune response, and (2) development of an immunosuppressive regimen based on blockade of the CD40/CD154 costimulation pathway to prevent the adaptive immune response. In the 1980s, after transplantation into nonhuman primates (NHPs), wild-type (genetically unmodified) pig organs were rejected within minutes or hours. In the 1990s, organs from pigs expressing a human complement-regulatory protein (CD55) transplanted into NHPs receiving intensive conventional immunosuppressive therapy functioned for days or weeks. When costimulation blockade was introduced in 2000, the adaptive immune response was suppressed more readily. The identification of galactose-α1,3-galactose as the major antigen target for human and NHP anti-pig antibodies in 1991 allowed for deletion of expression of galactose-α1,3-galactose in 2003, extending pig graft survival for up to 6 months. Subsequent gene editing to overcome molecular incompatibilities between the pig and primate coagulation systems proved additionally beneficial. The identification of 2 further pig carbohydrate xenoantigens allowed the production of 'triple-knockout' pigs that are preferred for clinical organ transplantation. These combined advances enabled the first clinical pig heart transplant to be performed and opened the door to formal clinical trials.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system function in the pig-to-baboon kidney xenotransplantation model

After pig-to-baboon kidney transplantation, episodes of hypovolemia and hypotension from an unexplained mechanism have been reported. This study evaluated the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system post-kidney xenotransplantation. Kidneys from genetically-engineered pigs were transplanted into 5 immunosuppressed baboons after the excision of the native kidneys. Immunosuppressive therapy was based on the blockade of the CD40/CD154 costimulation pathway. Plasma renin, angiotensinogen (AGT), angiotensin II (Ang II), aldosterone levels, and urine osmolality and electrolytes were measured in healthy pigs, healthy nonimmunosuppressed baboons, and immunosuppressed baboons with life-supporting pig kidney grafts. After pig kidney transplantation, plasma renin and Ang II levels were not significantly different, although Ang II trended lower, even though plasma AGT and potassium were increased. Plasma aldosterone levels were unchanged. Urine osmolality and sodium concentration were decreased. Even in the presence of increasing AGT and potassium levels, lower plasma Ang II concentrations may be because of reduced, albeit not absent, the reactivity of pig renin to cleave baboon AGT, suggesting an impaired response of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system to hypovolemic and hypotensive episodes. The maintenance of aldosterone may be protective. The reduced urine osmolality and sodium concentration reflect the decreased ability of the pig kidney to concentrate urine. These considerations should not prohibit successful clinical pig kidney xenotransplantation.

Observations on hydronephrosis after pig kidney transplantation in baboons

We have seen hydronephrosis (obstructive nephropathy) at necropsy in 3 of 11 (21%) genetically-engineered pig kidneys that functioned in baboons for >36 days, even when the clinical and histopathological features of rejection were minimal. We briefly report one such case and illustrate the macroscopic and microscopic appearances of such a kidney and ureter. The causes of the observed changes remain uncertain. In our small experience, there seems to be no correlation between the development of hydronephrosis and (i) the surgical technique, (ii) the genotype of the pig, (iii) the length of the pig ureter, or (iv) the immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory therapy administered. We suggest that the distal ureteric thickening may be the result of an inflammatory response. In two cases, we resolved the problem by carrying out a secondary side-to-side anastomosis between the proximal pig ureter and the baboon bladder.

Mechanisms and strategies to promote cardiac xenotransplantation

End stage heart failure is a terminal disease, and the only curative therapy is orthotopic heart transplantation. Due to limited organ availability, alternative strategies have received intense interest for treatment of patients with advanced heart failure. Recent studies using gene-edited porcine organs suggest that cardiac xenotransplantation may provide a future source of organs. In this review, we highlight the historical milestones for cardiac xenotransplantation and the gene editing strategies designed to overcome immunological barriers, which have culminated in a recent cardiac pig-to-human xenotransplant. We also discuss recent results of studies on the engineering of human-porcine chimeric organs that may provide an alternative and complementary strategy to overcome some of the major immunological barriers to producing a new source of transplantable organs.

The potential of genetically engineered pig heart transplantation in infants with complex congenital heart disease

Despite advances in surgical and medical techniques, complex congenital heart disease in neonates and infants continues to be associated with significant mortality and morbidity. More than 500 infants in the USA are placed on the cardiac transplantation wait-list annually. However, there remains a critical shortage of deceased human donor organs for transplantation with a median wait-time of 4 months. Hence, infant mortality on the heart transplant wait-list in the USA is higher than for any other solid organ transplant group. Orthotopic transplantation of a pig heart as a bridge to allotransplantation might offer the best prospect of long-term survival of these patients. In recent years, there have been several advances in genetic engineering of pigs to mitigate the vigorous antibody-mediated rejection of a pig heart transplanted into a nonhuman primate. In this review, we briefly highlight (i) the history of clinical heart xenotransplantation, (ii) current advances and techniques of genetically engineering pigs, (iii) the current status of pig orthotopic cardiac graft survival in nonhuman primates, and (iv) progress toward pursuing clinical trials of cardiac xenotransplantation. Ultimately, we argue that pig heart xenotransplantation should initially be used as a bridge to cardiac allotransplantation in neonates and infants.

Current status of xenotransplantation research and the strategies for preventing xenograft rejection

Transplantation is often the last resort for end-stage organ failures, e.g., kidney, liver, heart, lung, and pancreas. The shortage of donor organs is the main limiting factor for successful transplantation in humans. Except living donations, other alternatives are needed, e.g., xenotransplantation of pig organs. However, immune rejection remains the major challenge to overcome in xenotransplantation. There are three different xenogeneic types of rejections, based on the responses and mechanisms involved. It includes hyperacute rejection (HAR), delayed xenograft rejection (DXR) and chronic rejection. DXR, sometimes involves acute humoral xenograft rejection (AHR) and cellular xenograft rejection (CXR), which cannot be strictly distinguished from each other in pathological process. In this review, we comprehensively discussed the mechanism of these immunological rejections and summarized the strategies for preventing them, such as generation of gene knock out donors by different genome editing tools and the use of immunosuppressive regimens. We also addressed organ-specific barriers and challenges needed to pave the way for clinical xenotransplantation. Taken together, this information will benefit the current immunological research in the field of xenotransplantation.

The science of xenotransplantation for nephrologists

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The field of xenotransplantation has seen remarkable progress since its inception with recent preclinical trials in human recipients pushing kidney xenotransplantation one-step closer to clinical reality. In this review, we update practicing clinicians on recent advances in kidney xenotransplantation given the proximity of clinical trials in humans.

RECENT FINDINGS

Early studies in the field established the physiologic basis of xenotransplantation and suggested that the pig kidney will support human physiology. Genetic engineering of source pigs has greatly reduced the immunogenicity of kidney grafts, and studies in nonhuman primates have demonstrated the viability of kidney xenotransplants for months after transplantation. Finally, a recent study in a novel preclinical human model demonstrated that key findings in NHP experiments are generalizable to humans, namely, the absence of hyperacute rejection.

SUMMARY

Overall, it appears that critical physiologic, immunologic and technical barriers to implementation of clinical trials in humans have been overcome.

Current Topics of Relevance to the Xenotransplantation of Free Pig Islets

Pig islet xenotransplantation is a potential treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes. Current efforts are focused on identifying the optimal pig islet source and overcoming the immunological barrier. The optimal age of the pig donors remains controversial since both adult and neonatal pig islets have advantages. Isolation of adult islets using GMP grade collagenase has significantly improved the quantity and quality of adult islets, but neonatal islets can be isolated at a much lower cost. Certain culture media and coculture with mesenchymal stromal cells facilitate neonatal islet maturation and function. Genetic modification in pigs affords a promising strategy to prevent rejection. Deletion of expression of the three known carbohydrate xenoantigens (Gal, Neu5Gc, Sda) will certainly be beneficial in pig organ transplantation in humans, but this is not yet proven in islet transplantation, though the challenge of the '4th xenoantigen' may prove problematic in nonhuman primate models. Blockade of the CD40/CD154 costimulation pathway leads to long-term islet graft survival (of up to 965 days). Anti-CD40mAbs have already been applied in phase II clinical trials of islet allotransplantation. Fc region-modified anti-CD154mAbs successfully prevent the thrombotic complications reported previously. In this review, we discuss (I) the optimal age of the islet-source pig, (ii) progress in genetic modification of pigs, (iii) the immunosuppressive regimen for pig islet xenotransplantation, and (iv) the reduction in the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction.

The 2021 IXA Keith Reemtsma Lecture: Moving xenotransplantation to the clinic

Keith Reemtsma was a pioneer in xenotransplantation, the Honorary Founding President of the International Xenotransplantation Association (in 1998), and a wonderful personality. It is a privilege to be invited to give this lecture in his memory. If he were alive today, he would be delighted to see the progress that has been made in pig organ transplantation into nonhuman primate recipients. This progress has largely resulted from two major advances: (i) the increasing availability of pigs with multiple genetic manipulations aimed at protecting the cells of the organ from the primate immune response and (ii) the introduction of novel immunosuppressive agents that block the CD40/CD154 costimulation pathway. There is strong evidence from numerous in vitro studies that the transplantation of a triple-knockout pig organ, particularly if expressing several human protective proteins, into a patient is likely to be significantly more successful than if that same organ is transplanted into a nonhuman primate recipient. With this fact in mind, and in view of the advances currently being made, the time has surely come when we need to consider moving from the laboratory to the clinic. However, there are still questions we need to definitively resolve: (i) What exact genetic modifications do we need in the organ-source pig? (ii) What exact immunosuppressive regimen will we choose? (iii) How will we monitor the immune response and diagnose and treat rejection? and (iv) How do we plan to prevent or treat potential infectious complications? Furthermore, when these matters have been resolved, which patients will be offered a pig organ in the first trial? We have suggested that patients who are very unlikely to survive until a suitable deceased human donor kidney becomes available are those who should be considered for the initial trials. Assessing public attitudes to xenotransplantation is also important before embarking on a clinical trial. I suggest that progress is much more likely to be made from a small clinical trial than if we persist in carrying out experiments in an animal model that no longer mimics the clinical situation.

Profound thrombocytopenia associated with administration of multiple anti-inflammatory agents in baboons

Congestion, granular platelet debris both within macrophage and extracellularly, and neutrophil infiltration in the spleen of a baboon that was euthanized with profound thrombocytopenia.

"You cannot stay in the laboratory forever"*: Taking pig kidney xenotransplantation from the laboratory to the clinic

Progress in life-supporting kidney transplantation in the genetically-engineered pig-to-nonhuman primate model has been encouraging, with pig kidneys sometimes supporting life for > 1 year. What steps need to be taken by (i) the laboratory team, and (ii) the clinical team to prepare for the first clinical trial? The major topics include (i) what currently-available genetic modifications are optimal to reduce the possibility of graft rejection, (ii) what immunosuppressive therapeutic regimen is optimal, and (iii) what steps need to be taken to minimize the risk of transfer of an infectious microorganism with the graft. We suggest that patients who are unlikely to live long enough to receive a kidney from a deceased human donor would benefit from the opportunity of a period of dialysis-free support by a pig kidney, and the experience gained would enable xenotransplantation to progress much more rapidly than if we remain in the laboratory.

Don't pig(!) the wrong heart!

Cardiac xenotransplantation is believed to have approached clinical application. However, this approach to advanced heart failure is burdened with a multitude of ethical issues. These issues need to be addressed openly and be broadly discussed in public. Only through an honest and transparent approach, it will be possible to engage the lay audience in the evaluation of pig to human transplant.