Utilization of donors who have suffered cardiopulmonary arrest and resuscitation in intestinal transplantation

Does cardiopulmonary resuscitation before donor death affect solid organ transplant function? A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Patients who die after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are an important source of solid organs, but ischaemia-reperfusion injury may lead to worse recipient outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed if solid organs transplanted from donors who underwent CPR had worse outcomes compared to organs from donors who did not receive CPR.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until January 1, 2025. The primary outcome (graft survival at the longest follow-up) and secondary outcomes (30-day and 1-year graft survival) were calculated separately for each organ and pathway (brain/circulatory death).

RESULTS

We included 33 studies (26 in adults; 72,994 donors), of which three compared multiple organs and pathways. In 24 studies comparing brain-dead donors with vs without CPR in all organs, outcomes did not differ between groups. In nine studies, donation after uncontrolled circulatory death compared to donation after brain death showed a lower long-term survival for livers (OR 0.51 [0.32-0.83]) and lower short-term but not long-term survival (OR 0.64[0.36-1.15]) for kidneys. Two studies in kidneys compared donation in controlled vs uncontrolled circulatory death showing no different long-term survival (OR 0.73[0.27-1.99]).

CONCLUSIONS

Organs transplanted from donors who received CPR demonstrated comparable outcomes at the longest follow-up compared to organs from donors who did not receive CPR. Kidneys and livers after uncontrolled donation after circulatory death showed worse outcomes compared to donation after brain death.

Impact of Preprocurement Cardiac Arrest in Brain-Dead Donors on the Outcome of Pancreas Transplantation

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the risk factors and whether cardiac arrest (CA) in brain-death donors (DBD) could affect pancreas transplantation outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (2000-2020). The study included 21,499 pancreas transplantations, divided into CA-DBD and noCA-DBD groups based on whether the DBD had a history of CA.

RESULTS

There were 1129 CA-DBD (5.3%) transplantations. The principal donor death cause for both groups was head trauma. Graft and patient survival rates were similar in both groups. CA time (CAT) was a risk factor for pancreatic graft survival in the univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.08; P = .010) and multivariate Cox regression model (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.04; P =.015). Pancreas graft survival in those with CAT ≥30 minutes was significantly lower than in those with CAT <30 minutes and the noCA-DBD group (log-rank P = .018 and P = .014, respectively), which were comparable (log-rank P = .711). No relationships were found among the various transplantation types.

CONCLUSIONS

CA in donors did not affect the pancreatic graft prognosis. However, pancreatic donors with CAT ≥30 minutes should be meticulously evaluated.

Intestinal Donation and Utilization: Single-Center Analysis Within Eurotransplant

Intestinal donor criteria are classically kept strict, thereby limiting donor supply. Indications for intestinal transplantation (ITx) are rare, but improved outcome and new emerging indications lead to increased demand and relaxing donor criteria should be considered. We sought to compare the donor criteria of intestines transplanted at our center with predefined (per protocol) criteria, and to determine how relaxing donor criteria could impact the potential donor pool. Donor criteria used in 22 consecutive ITx at our center between 2000 and 2020 were compared with predefined criteria. Next, multiorgan donors effectively offered by our Donor Network to Eurotransplant between 2014 and 2020 were retrospectively screened, according to predefined and effectively used intestinal donation criteria. Finally, utilization rate of offered intestines was calculated. In our ITx series, the effectively used donor criteria were less strict than those initially predefined. With these relaxed criteria, a favorable 5-year graft/patient survival of 75% and 95%, respectively was reached. Applying these relaxed criteria would lead to a 127% increase in intestinal offers. Paradoxically, 70% of offered intestines were not used. In conclusion, a significant increase in intestinal donation could be obtained by relaxing donor criteria, while still achieving excellent outcome. Offered intestines are underutilized.

First case report of multivisceral transplant from a deceased cardiac death donor

The current shortage of pediatric multivisceral donors accounts for the long time and mortality on the waiting list of pediatric patients. The use of donors after cardiac death, especially after the outbreak of normothermic regional perfusion, has increased in recent years for all solid organs except the intestine, mainly because of its higher susceptibility to ischemia-reperfusion injury. We present the first literature case of multivisceral donors after cardiac death transplantation in a 13-month-old recipient from a 2.5-month-old donor. Once exitus was certified, an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit was established, cannulating the aorta and infrarenal vena cava, while the supra-aortic branches were clamped. The abdominal organs completely recovered from ischemia through normothermic regional perfusion (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initially and beating heart later). After perfusion with the preservation solution, the multivisceral graft was uneventfully implanted. Two months later, the patient was discharged without any complications. This case demonstrates the possibility of reducing the time spent on the waiting list for these patients.

Potential options to expand the intestinal donor pool: a comprehensive review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intestinal donation is currently restricted to 'perfect' donors, as the intestine is extremely vulnerable to ischemia. With generally deteriorating donor quality and increasing indications for intestinal transplantation (ITx), the potential to safely increase the donor pool should be evaluated.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increasing awareness on intestinal donation (often forgotten) and cautiously broadening the strict donor criteria (increasing age, resuscitation time and ICU stay) could expand the potential donor pool. Donors after circulatory death (DCD) have so far not been considered for ITx, due to the particularly detrimental effect of warm ischemia on the intestine. However, normothermic regional perfusion might be a well tolerated strategy to render the use of DCD intestinal grafts feasible. Furthermore, machine perfusion is under continuous development and might improve preservation of the intestine and potentially offer a platform to modulate the intestinal graft. Lastly, living donation currently represents only a minority of all ITxs performed worldwide. Various studies and registry analysis show that it can be performed safely for the donor and successfully in the recipient.

SUMMARY

Several potential strategies are available to expand the current intestinal donor pool. Most of them require further investigation or technical developments before they can be implemented in the clinical routine.

A proof of concept study on real-time LiMAx CYP1A2 liver function assessment of donor grafts during normothermic machine perfusion

No single reliable parameter exists to assess liver graft function of extended criteria donors during ex-vivo normothermic machine perfusion (NMP). The liver maximum capacity (LiMAx) test is a clinically validated cytochromal breath test, measuring liver function based on 13CO2 production. As an innovative concept, we aimed to integrate the LiMAx breath test with NMP to assess organ function. Eleven human livers were perfused using NMP. After one hour of stabilization, LiMAx testing was performed. Injury markers (ALT, AST, miR-122, FMN, and Suzuki-score) and lactate clearance were measured and related to LiMAx values. LiMAx values ranged between 111 and 1838 µg/kg/h, and performing consecutive LiMAx tests during longer NMP was feasible. No correlation was found between LiMAx value and miR-122 and FMN levels in the perfusate. However, a significant inverse correlation was found between LiMAx value and histological injury (Suzuki-score, R = − 0.874, P < 0.001), AST (R = − 0.812, P = 0.004) and ALT (R = − 0.687, P = 0.028). Furthermore, a significant correlation was found with lactate clearance (R = 0.683, P = 0.043). We demonstrate, as proof of principle, that liver function during NMP can be quantified using the LiMAx test, illustrating a positive correlation with traditional injury markers. This new breath-test application separates livers with adequate cytochromal liver function from inadequate ones and may support decision-making in the safe utilization of extended criteria donor grafts.

The Impact of Age and Luminal Preservation on the Development of Intestinal Preservation Injury in Rats

BACKGROUND

Organs from older donors are believed to withstand ischemia worse than those from younger donors. The effect of age on the development of intestinal preservation injury (IPI) is unclear.

METHODS

We compared the development of IPI in intestines from young (3 mo), adult (14 mo), and old (20 mo) rat donors and assessed if luminal preservation (LP) is effective in delaying IPI. Small intestines were perfused with, and stored in, preservation solution (Custodiol) with or without LP solution (polyethylene glycol 3350). IPI was studied using histology (Chiu score, Alcian blue staining), Western blot, and electrophysiological assessment (Ussing chamber) at 4, 8, and 14 hours.

RESULTS

Intestines of old rats did not show major histological alterations, whereas their aortas and kidneys revealed typical age-related changes (arteriosclerosis and glomerulosclerosis). Intestines from old rats fared similarly to their younger counterparts at all time points regarding preservation injury and goblet cells count. Intestines undergoing LP showed fewer histological signs of damage and higher goblet cells count when compared with samples without LP, regardless of donor age. Ussing chamber experiments indicated a time-dependent deterioration of all parameters studied, which was delayed by the use of LP.

CONCLUSIONS

Older intestines did not convincingly demonstrate a faster IPI compared with intestines from adult and young donors. The small differences between the age groups were nullified by the use of LP. LP significantly delayed the IPI in all age groups and may allow for longer preservation periods without an increased risk of mucosal damage.

Successful Heart Transplantation after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of Donors

BACKGROUND

 Heart transplantation (HTx) is the best therapy for end-stage heart failure. Unfortunately, death on the waiting list remains a problem. Decreasing the number of rejected organs could increase the donor pool.

METHODS

 A total of 144 patients underwent HTx at our department between 2010 and 2019. Of them, 27 patients received organs of donors with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) prior to organ donation (donor CPR) and were compared with patients who received organs without CPR (control; n = 117).

RESULTS

 We did not observe any disadvantage in the outcome of the donor CPR group compared with the control group. Postoperative morbidity and 1-year survival (control: 72%; donor CPR: 82%; p = 0.35) did not show any differences. We found no impact of the CPR time as well as the duration between CPR and organ donation, but we found an improved survival rate for donors suffering from anoxic brain injury compared with cerebral injury (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

 Donor organs should not be rejected for HTx due to resuscitation prior to donation. The need for CPR does not affect the graft function after HTx in both short- and mid-term outcomes. We encourage the use of these organs to increase the donor pool and preserve good results.

Impact of donor cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the outcome of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation-a retrospective study

Previous cardiac arrest in brain-dead donors has been discussed as a potential risk factor in pancreas transplantation (PT), leading to a higher rate of organ refusal. This study aimed to assess the impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in brain-dead donors on pancreas transplant outcome. A total of 518 type 1 diabetics underwent primary simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation at our center between 1994 and 2018. Patients were divided into groups, depending on whether their donor had been resuscitated or not. A total of 91 (17.6%) post-CPR donors had been accepted for transplantation (mean duration of cardiac arrest, 19.4 ± 15.6 min). Those donors were younger (P < 0.001), had lower pancreas donor risk index (PDRI, P = 0.003), and had higher serum creatinine levels (P = 0.021). With a median follow-up of 167 months (IQR 82-229), both groups demonstrated comparable short- and long-term patient and graft survival. The resuscitation time (<20 min vs. ≥20 min) also showed no impact, with similar survival rates for both groups. A multivariable Cox regression analysis suggested no statistically significant association between donor CPR and patient or graft survival. Our results indicate that post-CPR brain-dead donors are suitable for PT without increasing the risk of complications.

Intestinal Preservation Injury: A Comparison Between Rat, Porcine and Human Intestines

Advanced preservation injury (PI) after intestinal transplantation has deleterious short- and long-term effects and constitutes a major research topic. Logistics and costs favor rodent studies, whereas clinical translation mandates studies in larger animals or using human material. Despite diverging reports, no direct comparison between the development of intestinal PI in rats, pigs, and humans is available. We compared the development of PI in rat, porcine, and human intestines. Intestinal procurement and cold storage (CS) using histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution was performed in rats, pigs, and humans. Tissue samples were obtained after 8, 14, and 24 h of CS), and PI was assessed morphologically and at the molecular level (cleaved caspase-3, zonula occludens, claudin-3 and 4, tricellulin, occludin, cytokeratin-8) using immunohistochemistry and Western blot. Intestinal PI developed slower in pigs compared to rats and humans. Tissue injury and apoptosis were significantly higher in rats. Tight junction proteins showed quantitative and qualitative changes differing between species. Significant interspecies differences exist between rats, pigs, and humans regarding intestinal PI progression at tissue and molecular levels. These differences should be taken into account both with regards to study design and the interpretation of findings when relating them to the clinical setting.

Donor liver quality after hypovolemic shock and venous systemic oxygen persufflation in an experimental animal model

BACKGROUND

The ever growing demand for liver transplantation inevitably necessitates an expansion of the donor pool. Utilization of "shock organs" is considered suboptimal to date while the associated outcome has hardly been investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Male Wistar rats underwent a period of 30 min of hypovolemic shock. After 24 h livers were explanted and prior to reperfusion underwent either 18 h of cold storage (CS; N = 6) or 17 h of CS followed by 60 min venous systemic oxygen persufflation (VSOP; N = 6). The outcome of "shock organs (SHBD)" was compared to heart-beating donor (HBD; N = 12) as positive control and non-heart-beating donor (NHBD; N = 12) as negative control animal groups. Liver function was assessed by measuring enzyme release (AST, ALT, LDH), bile production, portal vein pressure and hepatic oxygen uptake during reperfusion. For reperfusion, the isolated perfused rat liver system was used.

RESULTS

Liver function was severely limited in NHBD group compared to HBD organs after 18 h of CS (e.g., AST; HBD: 32.25 ± 7.25 U/l vs. NHBD: 790 ± 414.56 U/l; p < 0.005). VSOP improved liver function of NHBD organs significantly (AST; NHBD + VSOP: 333.6 ± 149.1 U/l; p < 0.005). SHBD organs showed a comparable outcome to HBD and clearly better results than NHBD organs after 18 h of CS (AST; SHBD: 76.4 ± 21.9 U/l). After 17 h of CS accompanied by 60 min VSOP, no improvement concerning liver function and integrity of SHBD organs was observed while the results were severely deteriorated by VSOP resulting in higher enzyme release (AST; SHBD + VSOP: 213 ± 61 U/l, p < 0.001), higher portal vein pressure (SHBD: 10.8 ± 1.92 mm Hg vs. SHBD + VSOP: 21.6 ± 8.8 mm Hg; p < 0.05) and lower hepatic oxygen uptake (SHBD: 321.75 ± 3.87 ml/glw/min vs. SHBD + VSOP: 395.8 ± 46.64 ml/glw/min, p < 0.05) at 24 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the potential of "shock organs" within liver transplantation may be underestimated. If our findings are reproducable in humans, SHBD grafts should be considered as a valuable source for expanding the thus far limited donor pool.

Impact of Deceased Donor Cardiac Arrest Time on Postpancreas Transplant Graft Function and Survival

Introduction

Transplantation of pancreas allografts from donors that have experienced preprocurement cardiopulmonary arrest (PPCA) is not common, though use of PPCA grafts is routine in liver and kidney transplantation. This article reviews a large number of PPCA pancreas grafts at a single center and reports posttransplant outcomes including early graft dysfunction, length of hospital stay, rejection, and early and late graft survival.

Methods

Preprocurement cardiopulmonary arrest, arrest time, and donor and recipient pancreatic enzyme levels were collected from electronic and written medical records. The PPCA donors were stratified into 4 groups: none, less than 20 minutes, 20-39 minutes, and 40 minutes or greater. Graft survival was assessed at 7 and 90 days and at 1 year. Long-term graft survival was assessed by Cox regression analysis.

Results

The records of 606 pancreas transplants were reviewed, including 328 (54%) simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants. Preprocurement cardiopulmonary arrest occurred in 176 donors (29%; median time, 20 minutes). Median peak donor lipase was higher in PPCA donors (40 μ/L vs 29 μ/L, P = 0.02). Posttransplant, peak recipient amylase, and lipase levels were similar (P = 0.63). Prolonged arrest time (>40 minutes) was associated with higher donor peak lipase and lower recipient peak amylase (P = 0.05 for both). Stratified by donor arrest time, there was no difference in 7-day, 90-day, or 1-year graft survival. Cox regression comparing the 4 groups demonstrated no statistical difference in 10-year survival.

Conclusions

These results support transplantation of pancreas allografts from PPCA donors. Prolonged asystole was associated with higher peak donor serum lipase but lower peak recipient serum amylase. There were no differences in allograft survival.

Adult Intestinal Transplantation

Adult intestinal transplantation differs significantly from pediatric intestinal transplantation. While indications have remained largely consistent since 2000, indications for adults have expanded over the last two decades to include motility disorders and desmoid tumors. Graft type in adult recipients depends on the distinct anatomic characteristics of the adult recipient. Colonic inclusion, while initially speculated to portend unfavorable outcomes due to complex host-bacterial interactions has increased over the past two decades with superior graft survival and improved patient quality of life. Overall, outcomes have steadily improved. For adult intestinal transplant candidates, intestinal transplantation remains a mainstay therapy for complicated intestinal failure and is a promising option for other life threatening and debilitating conditions.

Advanced Cardiac Life Support: 2016 Singapore Guidelines

The main areas of emphasis in the Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines are: early recognition of cardiac arrest and call for help; good-quality chest compressions; early defibrillation when applicable; early administration of drugs; appropriate airway management ensuring normoventilation; and delivery of appropriate post-resuscitation care to enhance survival. Of note, it is important to monitor the quality of the various care procedures. The resuscitation team needs to reduce unnecessary interruptions to chest compressions in order to maintain adequate coronary perfusion pressure during the ACLS drill. In addition, the team needs to continually look out for reversible causes of the cardiac arrest.

Time trends in organ donation after neurologic determination of death: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

The cause of brain injury may influence the number of organs that can be procured and transplanted with donation following neurologic determination of death. We investigated whether the distribution of causes responsible for neurologic death has changed over time and, if so, whether this has had an impact on organ quality, transplantation rates and recipient outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study involving consecutive brain-dead organ donors in southern Alberta between 2003 and 2014. For each donor, we determined last available measures of organ injury and number of organs transplanted, and compared these variables for various causes of neurologic death. We compared trends to national Canadian data for 2000-2013 (2000-2011 for Quebec).

RESULTS

There were 226 brain-dead organ donors over the study period, of whom 100 (44.2%) had anoxic brain injury, 63 (27.9%) had stroke, and 51 (22.6%) had traumatic brain injury. The relative proportion of donors with traumatic brain injury decreased over time (> 30% in 2003-2005 v. 6%-23% in 2012-2014) (p = 0.004), whereas that with anoxic brain injury increased (14%-37% v. 46%-80%, respectively) (p < 0.001). Nationally, the annual number of brain-dead donors with traumatic brain injury decreased from 4.4 to less than 3 per million population between 2000 and 2013, and that with anoxic brain injury increased from 1.1 to 3.1 per million. Donors with anoxic brain injury had higher concentrations of creatinine, alanine aminotransferase and troponin T, and lower PaO2/FIO2 and urine output than donors with other diagnoses. The average number of organs transplanted per donor was 3.6 with anoxic brain injury versus 4.5 with traumatic brain injury or stroke (p = 0.002).

INTERPRETATION

Anoxic brain injury has become a leading cause of organ donation after neurologic determination of death in Canada. Organs from donors with anoxic brain injury have a greater degree of injury, and fewer are transplanted. These findings have implications for availability of organs for transplantation in patients with end-stage organ failure.

The viability of transplanting organs from donors who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review

AIMS

To identify reports of patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) prior to solid organ donation and compare recipient and organ function outcomes to those that did not undergo CPR. Donation after restoration of circulation then progressing to death and those donating with on-going CPR who would have otherwise have termination of efforts were both included.

METHODS

Systematic review. Clinical studies comparing the outcome of patients and organs retrieved from donors who underwent CPR with those that did not require CPR. Full-text articles were searched on EmBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials.

RESULTS

Twenty-two observational studies were included. There were 12,206 adult and 2552 paediatric organ transplantation identified. Comparing donation after restoration of circulation there was no difference in immediate, one year, and five-year graft function. Donation with on-going CPR was associated with reduced immediate graft function for both renal and hepatic transplantation, however long term function was not different.

CONCLUSIONS

CPR does not appear to adversely affect graft function. Patients who have restored circulation after resuscitation and subsequently progress to death should be evaluated for organ donation. Those with on-going CPR should be considered for hepatic and renal transplantation but there may be worse initial graft function.

Management of the Potential Organ Donor in the ICU: Society of Critical Care Medicine/American College of Chest Physicians/Association of Organ Procurement Organizations Consensus Statement

This document was developed through the collaborative efforts of the Society of Critical Care Medicine, the American College of Chest Physicians, and the Association of Organ Procurement Organizations. Under the auspices of these societies, a multidisciplinary, multi-institutional task force was convened, incorporating expertise in critical care medicine, organ donor management, and transplantation. Members of the task force were divided into 13 subcommittees, each focused on one of the following general or organ-specific areas: death determination using neurologic criteria, donation after circulatory death determination, authorization process, general contraindications to donation, hemodynamic management, endocrine dysfunction and hormone replacement therapy, pediatric donor management, cardiac donation, lung donation, liver donation, kidney donation, small bowel donation, and pancreas donation. Subcommittees were charged with generating a series of management-related questions related to their topic. For each question, subcommittees provided a summary of relevant literature and specific recommendations. The specific recommendations were approved by all members of the task force and then assembled into a complete document. Because the available literature was overwhelmingly comprised of observational studies and case series, representing low-quality evidence, a decision was made that the document would assume the form of a consensus statement rather than a formally graded guideline. The goal of this document is to provide critical care practitioners with essential information and practical recommendations related to management of the potential organ donor, based on the available literature and expert consensus.

Donor Heart Utilization following Cardiopulmonary Arrest and Resuscitation: Influence of Donor Characteristics and Wait Times in Transplant Regions

Background. Procurement of hearts from cardiopulmonary arrest and resuscitated (CPR) donors for transplantation is suboptimal. We studied the influences of donor factors and regional wait times on CPR donor heart utilization. Methods. From UNOS database (1998 to 2012), we identified 44,744 heart donors, of which 4,964 (11%) received CPR. Based on procurement of heart for transplantation, CPR donors were divided into hearts procured (HP) and hearts not procured (HNP) groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of heart procurement. Results. Of the 4,964 CPR donors, 1,427 (28.8%) were in the HP group. Donor characteristics that favored heart procurement include younger age (25.5 ± 15 yrs versus 39 ± 18 yrs, P ≤ 0.0001), male gender (34% versus 23%, P ≤ 0.0001), shorter CPR duration (<15 min versus >30 min, P ≤ 0.0001), and head trauma (60% versus 15%). Among the 11 UNOS regions, the highest procurement was in Region 1 (37%) and the lowest in Region 3 (24%). Regional transplant volumes and median waiting times did not influence heart procurement rates. Conclusions. Only 28.8% of CPR donor hearts were procured for transplantation. Factors favoring heart procurement include younger age, male gender, short CPR duration, and traumatic head injury. Heart procurement varied by region but not by transplant volumes or wait times.

Use of lung allografts from brain-dead donors after cardiopulmonary arrest and resuscitation

RATIONALE

Patients who progress to brain death after resuscitation from cardiac arrest have been hypothesized to represent an underused source of potential organ donors; however, there is a paucity of data regarding the viability of lung allografts after a period of cardiac arrest in the donor.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze postoperative complications and survival after lung transplant from brain-dead donors resuscitated after cardiac arrest.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing database records donors with cardiac arrest occurring after brain death. Adult recipients of lung allografts from these arrest/resuscitation donors between 2005 and 2011 were compared with nonarrest donors. Propensity score matching was used to reduce the effect of confounding. Postoperative complications and overall survival were assessed using McNemar's test for correlated binary proportions and Kaplan-Meier methods.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 479 lung transplant recipients from arrest/resuscitation donors were 1:1 propensity matched from a cohort of 9,076 control subjects. Baseline characteristics in the 1:1-matched cohort were balanced. There was no significant difference in perioperative mortality, airway dehiscence, dialysis requirement, postoperative length of stay (P ≥ 0.38 for all), or overall survival (P = 0.52). A subanalysis of the donor arrest group demonstrated similar survival when stratified by resuscitation time quartile (P = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence of inferior outcomes after lung transplant from brain-dead donors who have had a period of cardiac arrest provided that good lung function is preserved and the donor is otherwise deemed acceptable for transplantation. Potential expansion of the donor pool to include cardiac arrest as the cause of brain death requires further study.

The Physiology of Brain Death and Organ Donor Management

Brain death is associated with complex physiologic changes that may impact the management of the potential organ donor. Medical management is critical to actualizing the individual or family’s intent to donate and maximizing the benefit of that intent. This interval of care in the PICU begins with brain death and consent to donation and culminates with surgical organ procurement. During this phase, risks for hemodynamic instability and compromise of end organ function are high. The brain dead organ donor is in a distinct and challenging pathophysiologic condition that culminates in multifactorial shock. The potential benefits of aggressive medical management of the organ donor may include increased number of donors providing transplantable organs and increased number of organs transplanted per donor. This may improve graft function, graft survival, and patient survival in those transplanted. In this chapter, pathophysiologic changes occurring after brain death are reviewed. General and organ specific donor management strategies and logistic considerations are discussed. There is a significant opportunity for enhancing donor multi-organ function and improving organ utilization with appropriate PICU management.

Heart transplantation outcomes from cardiac arrest-resuscitated donors

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of heart transplantation from cardiopulmonary-resuscitated donors (CPR(+)) to those who received hearts from donors who did not require cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR(-)).

METHODS

This investigation was a retrospective analysis of UNOS adult heart transplantation donor and recipient data from May 1994 through July 2012. Discrete variables were compared using the chi-square test. Continuous variables were compared using the t-test. Patient and graft survival rates were calculated using the actuarial method and compared using Wilcoxon's test.

RESULTS

Of the 29,242 adult heart transplantations performed in USA during the study period, 1,396 patients (4.7%) received hearts from CPR(+) donors. The patients in the CPR(+) group were younger (25.5 ± 15 years vs 28.5 ± 14 years; p < 0.0001) and more likely to be female (31% vs 27%; p = 0.001). Mean duration of CPR in these donors was 20 minutes. UNOS listing status at the time of transplantation was Status 1A for 54.3% of those in the CPR(+) group and 46.9% in the CPR(-) group (p < 0.0001). More recipients were hospitalized and were in the intensive care unit at transplantation in the CPR(+) group (56% vs 51%; p = 0.0008). Recipient survival at 30 days, 1 year and 5 years was 95.2%, 88.2% and 72.9% in CPR(+) group, and 94.7%, 87.7% and 74.4% in the CPR(-) group, respectively. Similarly, graft survival at 30 days, 1 year and 5 years was 94.7%, 87.6% and 71.9% in the CPR(+) donor hearts, and 94.4%, 87.3% and 73.2% in the CPR(-) donor hearts, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This large, multicenter adult heart transplant database from across the USA did not show inferior outcomes in recipients of heart transplantation from selected CPR(+) donors. Recipient and graft survival were similar over 5 years of follow-up.

Impact of donor cardiopulmonary resuscitation on pediatric heart transplant outcome

Mortality is the highest of any solid organ in pediatric patients awaiting heart transplantation. Strategies to increase the donor pool are needed if survival to transplant is to improve. There can be reluctance to accept pediatric hearts for transplantation if the donor has received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This study asked if donor CPR impacts the survival of pediatric heart transplant recipients. Analysis of the UNOS database was performed for all cardiac transplants performed in patients aged 0-18 yr, with donors classified as to whether they received CPR (CPR+) or not (CPR-). We compared overall survival and survival at 30 days, one yr, and five yr between groups. Within the CPR+ group, the impact of duration of CPR on survival was compared. The need for inotropic support and ejection fraction was compared between donor groups as a measure of organ function. Overall survival and survival at 30 days, one yr, and five yr did not differ in the CPR+ compared to the CPR- group. Within the CPR+ group, duration of CPR was unrelated to post-transplant survival. The need for inotropic support at procurement was similar, and ejection fraction did not differ between the CPR+ and CPR- groups. Donor CPR does not have a negative impact on pediatric heart transplant survival.

The role of interleukin-6, endothelins, and apoptotic genes in small bowel transplantation, in a swine model of ischemia and reperfusion injury

IRI is closely related to sepsis in ITx setting. Complete understanding of the mechanisms involved in IRI development may improve outcomes. Ortothopic ITx without immunosuppression was performed in order to characterize IRI-associated mucosal damage. Twenty pigs underwent ITx. Two groups were assigned to different CI times: G1: 90 min and, G2: 180 min. Euro-Collins was used as preservation solution. Jejunal fragments were collected at donor laparotomy, 30 min, and 3 days after reperfusion. IRI assessment involved: histopathologic analysis, quantification of MPO-positive cells through immunohistochemical studies, quantification of epithelial apoptotic cells using TUNEL staining, and quantification of IL-6, ET-1, Bak, and Bcl-XL genes expression by RT-PCR. Neutrophilic infiltration increased in a similar fashion in both groups, but lasted longer in G2. Apoptosis detected by TUNEL staining increased and anti-apoptotic gene Bcl-XL expression decreased significantly in G1, 3 days after surgery. Endothelin-1 and IL-6 genes expression increased 30 min after the procedure and returned to baseline 3 days after surgery. In conclusion, IL-6 and ET-1 are involved precociously in the development of intestinal IRI. Apoptosis was more frequently detected in G1 grafts by TUNEL-staining and by RT-PCR.

Intestinal transplantation: current outcomes and opportunities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights current outcomes in intestinal transplantation and summarizes advances that have recently occurred in five interrelated areas: progress in intestinal rehabilitation, immunologic and technical modifications, awareness of opportunities for improved allograft monitoring, and better assessment of long-term complications and morbidities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Improved long-term management of patients with intestinal failure as well as improved outcomes with intestine transplant are changing the previously established paradigms of timing for referral. For those requiring transplant, use of monoclonal and polyclonal antibody induction protocols have been associated with improved outcomes. Experience at centers of excellence demonstrates 1 and 5 year patient survival rates of 93 and 78%, respectively with ongoing investigations focusing on lowering long-term causes of graft loss such as chronic rejection or morbidities such as renal dysfunction. Descriptions of tissue, proteomic and genomic technologies to complement traditional methodologies to monitor graft function are emerging.

SUMMARY

Optimal timing for referral of children with intestinal failure and improved medical and surgical therapies increase the opportunity for intestinal adaptation without the need for transplant. For those undergoing transplant, technical and immunologic modifications, developments in graft monitoring, and reduction of long-term morbidities are leading to improved outcomes.

Current perspectives on pediatric intestinal transplantation

Irreversible intestinal failure in children is predominantly caused by surgical conditions such as volvulus, necrotizing enterocolitis, and gastroschisis. Functional intestinal failure from motility disorders such as intestinal pseudo-obstruction or enterocyte dysfunction with microvillus inclusion disease also may require intestine replacement. Approved indications for intestinal transplantation include liver dysfunction, loss of major venous access, frequent central line-related sepsis, and recurrent episodes of severe dehydration despite intravenous fluid management. Surgical options include transplantation of the isolated intestine, combined liver-intestine transplantation, or multivisceral transplantation of the stomach, duodenum, pancreas, and small bowel (with or without the liver). Immunosuppression for intestinal transplantation is based on tacrolimus therapy, often with induction immunosuppression using antilymphocyte antibodies (eg, antithymocyte antibody and alemtuzumab). Experience at centers of excellence demonstrates 1- and 5-year patient survival rates of 95% and 77%, respectively, with ongoing investigations focusing on lowering long-term causes of graft loss such as chronic rejection.