A pilot study of gene expression-based categorization of pancreas transplant biopsies

Gene expression-based molecular scoring of pancreas transplant rejection for a quantitative assessment of rejection severity and resistance to treatment

Pancreas transplantation improves glycemic control and mortality in patients with diabetes but requires aggressive immunosuppression to control the alloimmune and autoimmune response. Recent developments in "omics" methods have provided gene transcript-based biomarkers for organ transplant rejection. The tissue Common Response Module (tCRM) score is developed to identify the severity of rejection in kidney, heart, liver, and lung transplants. Still, it has not yet been validated in pancreas transplants (PT). We evaluated the tCRM score's relevance in PT and additional markers of acute cellular rejection (ACR) for PT. An analysis of 51 pancreas biopsies with ACR identified 37 genes and 56 genes significantly upregulated in the case of grade 3 and grade 2 ACR, respectively (P < .05). Significant differences were seen with higher grades of rejection among several transcripts. Of the 22 genes differentially expressed in grade 3 ACR, 18 were also differentially expressed in grade 2 ACR. The rejection signal was attributable to activated leukocytes' infiltration. Significantly higher tCRM scores were found in grade 3 ACR (P = .007) and grade 2 ACR (P = .004), compared to normal samples. The tCRM score was able to distinguish treatment-resistant cases from those successfully treated for rejection.

Proteome Analysis for Inflammation Related to Acute and Convalescent Infection

Infectious diseases are a significant burden in global healthcare. Pathogens engage with different host defense mechanisms. However, it is currently unknown if there are disease-specific immune signatures and/or if different pathogens elicit common immune-associated molecular entities to common therapeutic interventions. We studied patients enrolled through the Human Immunology Project Consortium (HIPC), which focuses on immune responses to various infections. Blood samples were collected and analyzed from patients during infection and follow-up time points at the convalescent stage. The study included samples from patients with Lyme disease (LD), tuberculosis (TB), malaria (MLA), dengue virus (DENV), and West Nile virus (WNV), as well as kidney transplant patients with cytomegalovirus (CMV) and polyomavirus (BKV) infections. Using an antibody-based assay, we quantified ~ 350 cell surface markers, cytokines, and chemokines involved in inflammation and immunity. Unique protein signatures were identified specific to the acute phase of infection irrespective of the pathogen type, with significant changes during convalescence. In addition, tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 6 (TNR6), C-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 7 (CCR7), and C-C motif chemokine ligand-1 (CCL1) were increased in the acute and convalescent phases across all viral, bacterial, and protozoan compared to blood from healthy donors. Furthermore, despite the differences between pathogens, proteins were enriched in common biological pathways such as cell surface receptor signaling pathway and response to external stimulus. In conclusion, we demonstrated that irrespective of the pathogen type, there are common immunoregulatory and proinflammatory signals.

Molecular assessment of antibody-mediated rejection in human pancreas allograft biopsies

Pancreas transplant longevity is limited by immune rejection, which is diagnosed by graft biopsy using the Banff Classification. The histological criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are poorly reproducible and inconsistently associated with outcome. We hypothesized that a 34-gene set associated with antibody-mediated rejection in other solid organ transplants could improve diagnosis in pancreas grafts. The AMR 34-gene set, comprising endothelial, natural killer cell and inflammatory genes, was quantified using the NanoString platform in 52 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded pancreas transplant biopsies from 41 patients: 15 with pure AMR or mixed rejection, 22 with T cell-mediated rejection/borderline and 15 without rejection. The AMR 34-gene set was significantly increased in pure AMR and mixed rejection (P = .001) vs no rejection. The gene set predicted histological AMR with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) of 0.714 (P = .004). The AMR 34-gene set was the only biopsy feature significantly predictive of allograft failure in univariate analysis (P = .048). Adding gene expression to DSA and histology increased ROC AUC for the prediction of failure from 0.736 to 0.770, but this difference did not meet statistical significance. In conclusion, assessment of transcripts has the potential to improve diagnosis and outcome prediction in pancreas graft biopsies.

Pancreas transplantation, antibodies and rejection: where do we stand?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is acknowledged and defined in kidney transplantation, but where do we stand as far as pancreas transplantation is concerned? Here we appraise the most recent findings in pancreatic AMR and give suggestions for future research in the field by addressing currently unresolved issues.

RECENT FINDINGS

Five main topics are discussed: chronological assessment of all literature on biopsy-proven pancreatic AMR; role of C4d and recent development in other markers; the use of sentinel organs, such as kidney biopsies and duodenal patch biopsies for diagnosis of pancreatic AMR; studies addressing islet pathology and its relevance in AMR; and protocol and follow-up pancreas biopsy practice in relation to pancreas transplant management and survival.

SUMMARY

Antibody-mediated processes play a role in pancreas transplantation. However, sensitive markers, pathophysiological understanding, and adequate interventions have not yet been established. Much data are still lacking and we believe that studying protocol and follow-up biopsies along with serial donor-specific antibody data may improve pancreas transplant patient management and outcomes.

Molecular transplantation pathology: the interface between molecules and histopathology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the last decade, high-throughput molecular screening methods have revolutionized the transplantation research. This article reviews the new knowledge that has emerged from transplant patient sample-derived 'omics data by examining the interface between molecular signals and allograft pathology.

RECENT FINDINGS

State-of-the-art molecular studies have shed light on the biology of organ transplant diseases and provided several potential molecular tests with diagnostic, prognostic, and theranostic applications for the implementation of personalized medicine in transplantation. By comprehensive molecular profiling of patient samples, we have learned numerous new insights into the effector mechanisms and parenchymal response during allograft diseases. It has become evident that molecular profiles are coordinated and move in patterns similar to histopathology lesions, and therefore lack qualitative specificity. However, molecular tests can empower precision diagnosis and prognostication through their objective and quantitative manner when they are integrated in a holistic approach with histopathology and clinical factors of patients.

SUMMARY

Despite clever science and large amounts of public money invested in transplant 'omics studies, multiparametric molecular testing has not yet been translated to patient care. There are serious challenges in the implementation of transplant molecular diagnostics that have increased frustration in transplant community. We appeal for a full collaboration between pathologists and researchers to accelerate transition from research to clinical practice in transplantation.

The coin toss of B cells in rejection and tolerance: danger versus defense

Transplantation is the preferred therapy for the end stage organ disease. Since the introduction of organ transplantation into medical practice in 1953 [1], significant progress has been achieved in patient and graft survival rates due to improvements in surgical techniques and more targeted immunosuppressive medications [2]. Nevertheless, current gaps in the management of the transplant patient stem from an incomplete understanding about the heterogeneity of the injury response in organ transplantation, at different rates and different time points after transplantation, as well as our inability to monitor the immunologic threshold of risk versus safety in each individual patient. Recent advances in immunology/transplantation biology with the advent of high throughput "omic" assays such as gene microarrays, proteomics, metabolomics, antibiomics, chemical genomics and functional imaging with nanoparticles, offers us unique methods to interrogate and decipher the variability and unpredictability of the immune response in organ transplantation (Fig. 1) [3]. Recent studies using these applications [3-8] have uncovered a critical and pivotal role for specific B cell lineages in organ injury [9] and organ acceptance [10,11] (Fig. 2). The availability of specific therapies against some of these defined B cell populations provides for an exciting new field of B cell targeted manipulation that can both abrogate the allospecific injury response, as well as promote allospecific graft accommodation and health.

Guidelines for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in pancreas allografts-updated Banff grading schema

The first Banff proposal for the diagnosis of pancreas rejection (Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 237) dealt primarily with the diagnosis of acute T-cell-mediated rejection (ACMR), while only tentatively addressing issues pertaining to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). This document presents comprehensive guidelines for the diagnosis of AMR, first proposed at the 10th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology and refined by a broad-based multidisciplinary panel. Pancreatic AMR is best identified by a combination of serological and immunohistopathological findings consisting of (i) identification of circulating donor-specific antibodies, and histopathological data including (ii) morphological evidence of microvascular tissue injury and (iii) C4d staining in interacinar capillaries. Acute AMR is diagnosed conclusively if these three elements are present, whereas a diagnosis of suspicious for AMR is rendered if only two elements are identified. The identification of only one diagnostic element is not sufficient for the diagnosis of AMR but should prompt heightened clinical vigilance. AMR and ACMR may coexist, and should be recognized and graded independently. This proposal is based on our current knowledge of the pathogenesis of pancreas rejection and currently available tools for diagnosis. A systematized clinicopathological approach to AMR is essential for the development and assessment of much needed therapeutic interventions.