1
|
Zhu T, Shen Q, Shen L, Wang Y, Zhu B, Ma L, Feng S, Wang C, Yan S, Li J, Chen Z, Zhou J, Huang H, Li B, Shen Z, Wang Q, Wang J, Gwinner W, Scheffner I, Rong S, Yang B, Wang J, Haller H, Han X, Guo G, Yin Z, Jin J, Lan HY, Chen J, Jiang H. Senescence-induced p21 high macrophages contributed to CD8 + T cells-related immune hyporesponsiveness in kidney transplantation via Zfp36/IL-27 axis. Cell Discov 2025; 11:38. [PMID: 40234384 PMCID: PMC12000408 DOI: 10.1038/s41421-025-00784-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2025] [Indexed: 04/17/2025] Open
Abstract
Recipients' age has emerged as a key factor that impacts on acute renal allograft rejection and graft survival. Age-related functional and structural changes in the immune system have been observed, yet the precise influence of aged immunity on kidney transplant remains unclear. In an initial retrospective analysis of clinical data gathered from two major centers in China and Germany, we found a correlation between aging and mitigated rejection outcomes in kidney recipients. To study the mechanism, we performed kidney transplantation on mice and observed attenuated allograft rejection in senescent recipients. Single-cell transcriptome analysis of allograft kidneys indicated a protective role of p21high macrophages in aged mice. Supernatant collected from p21high macrophage primary culture inhibited the cytotoxic function and proliferation of CD8+ T cells. Zfp36 is highly expressed in senescent p21high macrophages. To determine its role in renal allograft rejection, we studied mice with Zfp36 conditionally deleted in macrophages (Zfp36-cKO). These mice developed exacerbated allograft rejection with enhanced IL-27 production and CD8+ T cell hyperactivation. Inhibition of IL-27 with neutralizing antibody or deletion of IL-27 receptor on CD8+ T cells reversed acute renal allograft rejection in Zfp36-cKO mice. Moreover, in vitro silencing Zfp36 with siRNA led to impaired degradation of IL-27 p28 mRNA and a subsequent increase of IL-27 in p21high macrophages. In conclusion, senescent macrophages protect renal allograft rejection by suppressing CD8+ T cells via a Zfp36/IL-27-dependent mechanism. These findings may provide innovative therapeutic strategies for addressing kidney allograft rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Zhu
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Nephrology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University Medical College Affiliated, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qixia Shen
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lingling Shen
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yucheng Wang
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Bochen Zhu
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lifeng Ma
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center of the First Affiliated Hospital, and Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Shi Feng
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Cuili Wang
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Sijing Yan
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jingyi Li
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhimin Chen
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jingyi Zhou
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hongfeng Huang
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Bingjue Li
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhouji Shen
- Ningbo Medical Center LiHuiLi Hospital, The Affiliated LiHuiLi Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qian Wang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhuhai Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhuhai People's Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University, Jinan University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China
- The Biomedical Translational Research Institute, Health Science Center (School of Medicine), Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jianwei Wang
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Wilfried Gwinner
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Irina Scheffner
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Song Rong
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bing Yang
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Cancer Molecular Cell Biology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Junwen Wang
- Division of AOS & CDC, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Hermann Haller
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Xiaoping Han
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center of the First Affiliated Hospital, and Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Guoji Guo
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center of the First Affiliated Hospital, and Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhinan Yin
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhuhai Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhuhai People's Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University, Jinan University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China
- The Biomedical Translational Research Institute, Health Science Center (School of Medicine), Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jin Jin
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis & Protection, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Cancer Molecular Cell Biology, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hui-Yao Lan
- Department of Medicine & Therapeutics and Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jianghua Chen
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Hong Jiang
- Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
- Institute of Nephropathy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urinary System Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shen X, Wu J, Zhang F, Bi Q, Sun Z, Wang W. Deciphering the impact of senescence in kidney transplant rejection: An integrative machine learning and multi-omics analysis via bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0312272. [PMID: 39602449 PMCID: PMC11602102 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2024] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The demographic shift towards an older population presents significant challenges for kidney transplantation (KTx), particularly due to the vulnerability of aged donor kidneys to ischemic damage, delayed graft function, and reduced graft survival. KTx rejection poses a significant threat to allograft function and longevity of the kidney graft. The relationship between senescence and rejection remains elusive and controversial. METHODS Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) provided microarray and single-cell RNA sequencing datasets. After integrating Senescence-Related Genes (SRGs) from multiple established databases, differential expression analysis, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and machine learning algorithms were applied to identify predictive SRGs (pSRGs). A cluster analysis of rejection samples was conducted using the consensus clustering algorithm. Subsequently, we utilized multiple machine learning methods (RF, SVM, XGB, GLM and LASSO) based on pSRGs to develop the optimal Acute Rejection (AR) diagnostic model and long-term graft survival predictive signatures. Finally, we validated the role of pSRGs and senescence in kidney rejection through the single-cell landscape. RESULTS Thirteen pSRGs were identified, correlating with rejection. Two rejection clusters were divided (Cluster C1 and C2). GSVA analysis of two clusters underscored a positive correlation between senescence, KTx rejection occurrence and worse graft survival. A non-invasive diagnostic model (AUC = 0.975) and a prognostic model (1- Year AUC = 0.881; 2- Year AUC = 0.880; 3- Year AUC = 0.883) for graft survival were developed, demonstrating significant predictive capabilities to early detect acute rejection and long-term graft outcomes. Single-cell sequencing analysis provided a detailed cellular-level landscape of rejection, supporting the conclusions drawn from above. CONCLUSION Our comprehensive analysis underscores the pivotal role of senescence in KTx rejection, highlighting the potential of SRGs as biomarkers for diagnosing rejection and predicting graft survival, which may enhance personalized treatment strategies and improve transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xihao Shen
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jiyue Wu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Feilong Zhang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Qing Bi
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zejia Sun
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Süsal C, Kumru G, Döhler B, Morath C, Baas M, Lutz J, Unterrainer C, Arns W, Aubert O, Bara C, Beiras-Fernandez A, Böhmig GA, Bösmüller C, Diekmann F, Dutkowski P, Hauser I, Legendre C, Lozanovski VJ, Mehrabi A, Melk A, Minor T, Mueller TF, Pisarski P, Rostaing L, Schemmer P, Schneeberger S, Schwenger V, Sommerer C, Tönshoff B, Viebahn R, Viklicky O, Weimer R, Weiss KH, Zeier M, Živčić-Ćosić S, Heemann U. Should kidney allografts from old donors be allocated only to old recipients? Transpl Int 2020; 33:849-857. [PMID: 32337766 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Revised: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
In several deceased donor kidney allocation systems, organs from elderly donors are allocated primarily to elderly recipients. The Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) was implemented in 1999, and since then, especially in Europe, the use of organs from elderly donors has steadily increased. The proportion of ≥60-year-old donors reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS) by European centers has doubled, from 21% in 2000-2001 to 42% in 2016-2017. Therefore, in the era of organ shortage it is a matter of debate whether kidney organs from elderly donors should only be allocated to elderly recipients or whether <65-year-old recipients can also benefit from these generally as "marginal" categorized organs. To discuss this issue, a European Consensus Meeting was organized by the CTS on April 12, 2018, in Heidelberg, in which 36 experts participated. Based on available evidence, it was unanimously concluded that kidney organs from 65- to 74-year-old donors can also be allocated to 55- to 64-year-old recipients, especially if these organs are from donors with no history of hypertension, no increased creatinine, no cerebrovascular death, and no other reasons for defining a marginal donor, such as diabetes or cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caner Süsal
- Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gizem Kumru
- Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bernd Döhler
- Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Morath
- Division of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marije Baas
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jens Lutz
- Division of Nephrology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Clinic, Gemeinschaftsklinikum Mittelrhein, Koblenz, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Arns
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Service de Transplantation Rénale et Unité de Soins Intensifs, AP-HP, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Christoph Bara
- Division of Thoracic Transplantation and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Andres Beiras-Fernandez
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Georg A Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Claudia Bösmüller
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, ICNU, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Philipp Dutkowski
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ingeborg Hauser
- Department of Nephrology, Medinizische Klinik III, UKF, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Service de Transplantation Rénale et Unité de Soins Intensifs, AP-HP, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Vladimir J Lozanovski
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anette Melk
- Department of Pediatric Kidney, Liver and Metabolic Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas Minor
- Department of Surgical Research, Clinic for General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | - Thomas F Mueller
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Przemyslaw Pisarski
- Department for General and Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lionel Rostaing
- Service de Néphrologie, Dialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Peter Schemmer
- Department of Surgery, General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Vedat Schwenger
- Department of Nephrology and Autoimmune Diseases, Transplantation Center, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Claudia Sommerer
- Division of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Burkhard Tönshoff
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Richard Viebahn
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Ondrej Viklicky
- Department of Nephrology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Rolf Weimer
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Karl-Heinz Weiss
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Zeier
- Division of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stela Živčić-Ćosić
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Uwe Heemann
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kvietkauskas M, Leber B, Strupas K, Stiegler P, Schemmer P. Machine Perfusion of Extended Criteria Donor Organs: Immunological Aspects. Front Immunol 2020; 11:192. [PMID: 32180769 PMCID: PMC7057848 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to higher vulnerability and immunogenicity of extended criteria donor (ECD) organs used for organ transplantation (Tx), the discovery of new treatment strategies, involving tissue allorecognition pathways, is important. The implementation of machine perfusion (MP) led to improved estimation of the organ quality and introduced the possibility to achieve graft reconditioning prior to Tx. A significant number of experimental and clinical trials demonstrated increasing support for MP as a promising method of ECD organ preservation compared to classical static cold storage. MP reduced ischemia-reperfusion injury resulting in the protection from inadequate activation of innate immunity. However, there are no general agreements on MP protocols, and clinical application is limited. The objective of this comprehensive review is to summarize literature on immunological effects of MP of ECD organs based on experimental studies and clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mindaugas Kvietkauskas
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Bettina Leber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Philipp Stiegler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Peter Schemmer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Neri A, Scalzotto E, Corradi V, Caprara C, Salin A, Cannone M, De Cal M, Romano G, Tulissi P, Cussigh AR, Montanaro D, Frigo A, Giavarina D, Chiaramonte S, Ronco C. Acute rejection in kidney transplantation and the evaluation of associated polymorphisms (SNPs): the importance of sample size. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 6:287-295. [PMID: 30901313 DOI: 10.1515/dx-2018-0110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Background Acute rejection (AR) is one of the most frequent complications after kidney transplantation (KT). Scientific evidence reports that some single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in genes involved in the immune response and in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of immunosuppressive drugs are associated with rejection in renal transplant patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate some SNPs located in six genes: interleukin-10 (IL-10), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette sub-family B member 1 (ABCB1), uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase family 1 member A9 (UGT1A9), inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase 1 (IMPDH1) and IMPDH2. Methods We enrolled cases with at least one AR after KT and two groups of controls: patients without any AR after KT and healthy blood donors. Genetic analysis on DNA was performed. The heterozygosity (HET) was determined and the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) test was performed for each SNP. The sample size was calculated using the QUANTO program and the genetic associations were calculated using the SAS program (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Results In our previous preliminary study (sample size was not reached for cases), the results showed that patients with the C allele in the SNP rs1045642 and the A allele in the SNP rs2032582 of the ABCB1 gene had more frequent AR. In contrast, with the achievement of sample size, the trend of the previous data was not confirmed. Conclusions Our study highlights a fundamental aspect of scientific research that is generally presumed, i.e. the sample size of groups enrolled for a scientific study. We believe that our study will make a significant contribution to the scientific community in the discussion of the importance of the analysis and the achievement of sample size to evaluate the associations between SNPs and the studied event.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Neri
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, International Renal Research Institute of Vicenza (IRRIV), San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Elisa Scalzotto
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, International Renal Research Institute of Vicenza (IRRIV), San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Valentina Corradi
- Specialist Biologist in Genetics, Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, International Renal Research Institute of Vicenza (IRRIV), ULSS 8 BERICA, San Bortolo Hospital, San Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Carlotta Caprara
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, International Renal Research Institute of Vicenza (IRRIV), San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Alberto Salin
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, International Renal Research Institute of Vicenza (IRRIV), San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Manuela Cannone
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, International Renal Research Institute of Vicenza (IRRIV), San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Massimo De Cal
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, International Renal Research Institute of Vicenza (IRRIV), San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Annachiara Frigo
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiology, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Davide Giavarina
- Laboratory of Clinical Analysis, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Stefano Chiaramonte
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, International Renal Research Institute of Vicenza (IRRIV), San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Claudio Ronco
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, International Renal Research Institute of Vicenza (IRRIV), San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rana A, Murthy B, Pallister Z, Kueht M, Cotton R, Galvan NTN, Etheridge W, Liu H, Goss J, O'Mahony C. Profiling risk for acute rejection in kidney transplantation: recipient age is a robust risk factor. J Nephrol 2016; 30:859-868. [PMID: 27686224 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-016-0354-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2016] [Accepted: 09/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Careful management of immunosuppression is paramount to prevent acute rejection in kidney transplantation. We studied a cohort of 139,875 kidney transplant recipients from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database between 2002 and 2013. We confirmed the analysis with a cohort of 35,277 who received thymoglobulin induction with tacrolimus maintenance, and a third cohort of 12,161 recipients who received basiliximab induction with tacrolimus maintenance. We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses on data from all three cohorts and identified independent risk factors for treated acute rejection at 1 year. Recipient age was a robust risk factor for rejection in all three cohorts in a dose response pattern. Young age (18-25 years) was among the strongest risk factors for rejection in all three cohorts; thymoglobulin cohort: OR 1.87 (1.59-2.19); basiliximab cohort: OR 2.41 (1.89-3.05); and inclusive cohort: OR 1.97 (1.83-2.12). The opposite was true for old age (65-69 years); thymoglobulin cohort: OR 0.69 (0.59-0.81); basiliximab cohort: OR 0.77 (0.62-0.96); and inclusive cohort: OR 0.75 (0.70-0.80). This study is unique because it is the largest and most comprehensive multivariate analysis that demonstrates recipient age is a robust risk factor for acute rejection in an inverse dose response pattern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbas Rana
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery,Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS:BCM390, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Bhamidipati Murthy
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery,Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS:BCM390, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Zachery Pallister
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael Kueht
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ronald Cotton
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery,Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS:BCM390, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - N Thao N Galvan
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery,Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS:BCM390, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Whiston Etheridge
- Department of Transplant Nephrology, Baylor St Luke's Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hau Liu
- Dan Duncan Cancer Center, Department of Biostatistics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John Goss
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery,Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS:BCM390, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Christine O'Mahony
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery,Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS:BCM390, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pretransplant Immune- and Apoptosis-Related Gene Expression Is Associated with Kidney Allograft Function. Mediators Inflamm 2016; 2016:8970291. [PMID: 27382192 PMCID: PMC4921144 DOI: 10.1155/2016/8970291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2016] [Revised: 04/22/2016] [Accepted: 05/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Renal transplant candidates present immune dysregulation, caused by chronic uremia. The aim of the study was to investigate whether pretransplant peripheral blood gene expression of immune factors affects clinical outcome of renal allograft recipients. Methods. In a prospective study, we analyzed pretransplant peripheral blood gene expression in87 renal transplant candidates with real-time PCR on custom-designed low density arrays (TaqMan). Results. Immediate posttransplant graft function (14-day GFR) was influenced negatively by TGFB1 (P = 0.039) and positively by IL-2 gene expression (P = 0.040). Pretransplant blood mRNA expression of apoptosis-related genes (CASP3, FAS, and IL-18) and Th1-derived cytokine gene IFNG correlated positively with short- (6-month GFR CASP3: P = 0.027, FAS: P = 0.021, and IFNG: P = 0.029) and long-term graft function (24-month GFR CASP3: P = 0.003, FAS: P = 0.033, IL-18: P = 0.044, and IFNG: P = 0.04). Conclusion. Lowered pretransplant Th1-derived cytokine and apoptosis-related gene expressions were a hallmark of subsequent worse kidney function but not of acute rejection rate. The pretransplant IFNG and CASP3 and FAS and IL-18 genes' expression in the recipients' peripheral blood is the possible candidate for novel biomarker of short- and long-term allograft function.
Collapse
|
8
|
Montero N, Pérez-Sáez MJ, Pascual J, Abramowicz D, Budde K, Dudley C, Hazzan M, Klinger M, Maggiore U, Oberbauer R, Pascual J, Sorensen SS, Viklicky O. Immunosuppression in the elderly renal allograft recipient: a systematic review. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2016; 30:144-53. [PMID: 27279024 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2016.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Elderly are the fastest growing part of kidney transplant recipients. The best immunosuppressive strategy is unknown. METHODS We performed a systematic search of randomized controlled trials and observational studies focused on safety and efficacy of different immunosuppression strategies in elderly kidney recipients. Data extraction and risk of bias evaluation were systematically performed. RESULTS Ten studies were included: 2 randomized clinical trials and 8 observational. A marginal benefit was found for early renal function with delayed tacrolimus or complete tacrolimus avoidance using mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Observational cohort studies looked at different antibody induction strategies, calcineurin-inhibitors based maintenance immunosuppression, calcineurin-inhibitor-free sirolimus-based therapy and use of MMF versus azathioprine. Treatment with interleukin-2 receptor antibody induction, calcineurin-inhibitor minimization with MMF and steroid minimization is advisable in the low immunologic risk elderly recipient, considering the increased risk of toxicities, infection and malignancies. In the high immunologic risk elderly recipient, taking into account the morbid consequences of acute rejection in the elderly, observational studies support antibody induction with depletive antibodies, calcineurin-inhibitor, MMF and steroids; calcineurin-inhibitor-minimization is not recommended. CONCLUSIONS There is very limited evidence for the benefits and harms of different immunosuppression strategies in the elderly. Most of the published literature are observational studies, and randomized controlled trials are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuria Montero
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María José Pérez-Sáez
- Red de Investigación Renal (Redinren) Instituto Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julio Pascual
- Red de Investigación Renal (Redinren) Instituto Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Daniel Abramowicz
- Department of Nephrology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Mark Hazzan
- Service de Néphrologie, Univ Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - Marian Klinger
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland
| | - Umberto Maggiore
- Department of Nephrology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Rainer Oberbauer
- Department of Nephrology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Julio Pascual
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Soren S Sorensen
- Department of Nephrology P, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ondrej Viklicky
- Department of Nephrology, Transplant Centre, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Filiopoulos V, Boletis JN. Renal transplantation with expanded criteria donors: Which is the optimal immunosuppression? World J Transplant 2016; 6:103-114. [PMID: 27011908 PMCID: PMC4801786 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i1.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2015] [Revised: 11/03/2015] [Accepted: 01/04/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The growing gap between demand and supply for kidney transplants has led to renewed interest in the use of expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys in an effort to increase the donor pool. Although most studies of ECD kidney transplantation confirm lower allograft survival rates and, generally, worse outcomes than standard criteria donor kidneys, recipients of ECD kidneys generally have improved survival compared with wait-listed dialysis patients, thus encouraging the pursuit of this type of kidney transplantation. The relative benefits of transplantation using kidneys from ECDs are dependent on patient characteristics and the waiting time on dialysis. Because of the increased risk of poor graft function, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-induced nephrotoxicity, increased incidence of infections, cardiovascular risk, and malignancies, elderly recipients of an ECD kidney transplant are a special population that requires a tailored immunosuppressive regimen. Recipients of ECD kidneys often are excluded from transplant trials and, therefore, the optimal induction and maintenance immunosuppressive regimen for them is not known. Approaches are largely center specific and based upon expert opinion. Some data suggest that antithymocyte globulin might be the preferred induction agent for elderly recipients of ECD kidneys. Maintenance regimens that spare CNIs have been advocated, especially for older recipients of ECD kidneys. CNI-free regimens are not universally accepted due to occasionally high rejection rates. However, reduced CNI exposure and CNI-free regimens based on mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors have shown acceptable outcomes in appropriately selected ECD transplant recipients.
Collapse
|
10
|
Sutherland AI, IJzermans JNM, Forsythe JLR, Dor FJMF. Kidney and liver transplantation in the elderly. Br J Surg 2015; 103:e62-72. [PMID: 26662845 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2015] [Accepted: 10/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transplant surgery is facing a shortage of deceased donor organs. In response, the criteria for organ donation have been extended, and an increasing number of organs from older donors are being used. For recipients, the benefits of transplantation are great, and the growing ageing population has led to increasing numbers of elderly patients being accepted for transplantation. METHODS The literature was reviewed to investigate the impact of age of donors and recipients in abdominal organ transplantation, and to highlight aspects of the fine balance in donor and recipient selection and screening, as well as allocation policies fair to young and old alike. RESULTS Overall, kidney and liver transplantation from older deceased donors have good outcomes, but are not as good as those from younger donors. Careful donor selection based on risk indices, and potentially biomarkers, special allocation schemes to match elderly donors with elderly recipients, and vigorous recipient selection, allows good outcomes with increasing age of both donors and recipients. The results of live kidney donation have been excellent for donor and recipient, and there is a trend towards inclusion of older donors. Future strategies, including personalized immunosuppression for older recipients as well as machine preservation and reconditioning of donor organs, are promising ways to improve the outcome of transplantation between older donors and older recipients. CONCLUSION Kidney and liver transplantation in the elderly is a clinical reality. Outcomes are good, but can be optimized by using strategies that modify donor risk factors and recipient co-morbidities, and personalized approaches to organ allocation and immunosuppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A I Sutherland
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - J N M IJzermans
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J L R Forsythe
- Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - F J M F Dor
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Matignon M, Aissat A, Canoui-Poitrine F, Grondin C, Pilon C, Desvaux D, Saadoun D, Barathon Q, Garrido M, Audard V, Rémy P, Lang P, Cohen J, Grimbert P. Th-17 Alloimmune Responses in Renal Allograft Biopsies From Recipients of Kidney Transplants Using Extended Criteria Donors During Acute T Cell-Mediated Rejection. Am J Transplant 2015; 15:2718-25. [PMID: 25989263 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2015] [Revised: 02/15/2015] [Accepted: 03/07/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Although renal transplantation using expanded criteria donors has become a common practice, immune responses related to immunosenescence in those kidney allografts have not been studied yet in humans. We performed a retrospective molecular analysis of the T cell immune response in 43 kidney biopsies from patients with acute T cell-mediated rejection including 25 from recipients engrafted with a kidney from expanded criteria donor and 18 from recipients grafted with optimal kidney allograft. The clinical, transplant and acute T cell-mediated rejection characteristics of both groups were similar at baseline. The expression of RORγt, Il-17 and T-bet mRNA was significantly higher in the elderly than in the optimal group (p = 0.02, p = 0.036, and p = 0.01, respectively). Foxp3 mRNA levels were significantly higher in elderly patients experiencing successful acute T cell-mediated rejection reversal (p = 0.03). The presence of IL-17 mRNA was strongly associated with nonsuccessful reversal in elderly patients (p = 0.008). Patients with mRNA IL17 expression detection and low mRNA Foxp3 expression experienced significantly more treatment failure (87.5%) than patients with no mRNA IL17 expression and/or high mRNA Foxp3 expression (26.7%; p = 0.017). Our study suggests that the Th17 pathway is involved in pathogenesis and prognosis of acute T cell-mediated rejection in recipients of expanded criteria allograft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Matignon
- APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, Nephrology and Transplantation Department, Créteil, France.,UPEC, Inserm U955, Team 21, Créteil, France.,APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, CIC biotherapy, Créteil, France
| | - A Aissat
- UPEC, Inserm U955, Team 11, Créteil, France
| | - F Canoui-Poitrine
- APHP, Henri-Mondor hospital, Public Health department and Clinical Research Unit (URC-Mondor), Créteil, France.,UPEC, LIC EA4393, Créteil, France
| | - C Grondin
- UPEC, Inserm U955, Team 21, Créteil, France.,APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, CIC biotherapy, Créteil, France
| | - C Pilon
- UPEC, Inserm U955, Team 21, Créteil, France.,APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, CIC biotherapy, Créteil, France
| | - D Desvaux
- UPEC, Inserm U955, Team 21, Créteil, France.,Anatomopathology Department, APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - D Saadoun
- APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital, Internal Medicine and Immunology Department, Centre national de référence des Maladies Autoimmunes et systémiques rares, DHU I2B: Inflammation, Immunopathology, Biotherapy, Paris, France.,Laboratoire I3: Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapeutique, UMR 7211 (UPMC/CNRS), U959 (INSERM), Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Q Barathon
- UPEC, Inserm U955, Team 21, Créteil, France.,APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, CIC biotherapy, Créteil, France
| | - M Garrido
- Laboratoire I3: Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapeutique, UMR 7211 (UPMC/CNRS), U959 (INSERM), Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - V Audard
- APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, Nephrology and Transplantation Department, Créteil, France.,UPEC, Inserm U955, Team 21, Créteil, France.,APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, CIC biotherapy, Créteil, France
| | - P Rémy
- APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, Nephrology and Transplantation Department, Créteil, France.,UPEC, Inserm U955, Team 21, Créteil, France.,APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, CIC biotherapy, Créteil, France
| | - P Lang
- APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, Nephrology and Transplantation Department, Créteil, France.,UPEC, Inserm U955, Team 21, Créteil, France
| | - J Cohen
- UPEC, Inserm U955, Team 21, Créteil, France.,APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, CIC biotherapy, Créteil, France
| | - P Grimbert
- APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, Nephrology and Transplantation Department, Créteil, France.,UPEC, Inserm U955, Team 21, Créteil, France.,APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, CIC biotherapy, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The risk of cancer in recipients of living-donor, standard and expanded criteria deceased donor kidney transplants: a registry analysis. Transplantation 2015; 98:1286-93. [PMID: 25119131 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000000375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidneys from expanded criteria deceased donors may elicit a strong inflammatory response, predisposing recipients to an increased risk of cancer after transplantation. We aimed to determine the association between donor types and cancer risk after kidney transplantation. METHODS Using the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, we assessed the association between different donor types (living donor, standard, and expanded criteria deceased donors) and the risk of cancer after kidney transplantation using adjusted Cox proportional hazard and competing risk models. RESULTS Over a median follow-up period of 4.4 years in 7,040 patients (34,684 patient-years), 468 patients (6.6%) developed cancer. The overall risks for cancer were 1,080, 1,444, and 2,018 per 100,000 patient-years for recipients of living donor, standard, and expanded criteria deceased donor kidneys, respectively. Compared to recipients of living-donor kidneys, recipients of expanded criteria deceased donor kidneys were at an increased risk of cancer (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.15-2.02; P = 0.004), particularly for genitourinary cancer (adjusted HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.03-3.10; P = 0.038) and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (adjusted HR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.38-5.37; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION Recipients of expanded criteria deceased donor kidneys are at substantially increased risk of cancer, especially cancers with a viral etiology. Allocation of expanded criteria deceased donor kidneys to potential recipients should balance the harms, such as the excess risk of cancer against the survival gains and quality-of-life benefits associated with transplantation.
Collapse
|
13
|
Managing transplant rejection in the elderly: the benefits of less aggressive immunosuppressive regimens. Drugs Aging 2014; 30:459-66. [PMID: 23609876 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-013-0082-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Organ transplantation is increasingly common in the older population, particularly among end-stage renal disease patients. The outcomes of transplantation are often inferior in older people compared with younger recipients, partly because of the side effects of immunosuppressive medication used after organ transplantation. In this paper, we explore treatment considerations for older transplant patients. The current commonly used immunosuppressive protocols have not been validated sufficiently in older organ recipients. The primary objective for the management of transplant recipients of all ages is to prevent rejection without increasing the risk of infection or other long-term complications. To avoid serious side effects related to immunosuppressive treatment, the clinician should consider modifying and tailoring the long-term regimen for individual patients. Modifications for older recipients include reduction in the dosage or avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors, with or without the introduction of a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor and discontinuing the use of corticosteroids. Such modifications must consider the individual risks and needs of each recipient. Treatment of an acute rejection episode should follow the same protocol as for younger recipients, but special attention is needed to ensure reduction in the total immunosuppressive load. One way to achieve this is to avoid anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction and to use on-demand ATG treatment of rejection on the basis of the patient's CD3 T cell count.
Collapse
|
14
|
Somma C, Trillini M, Kasa M, Gentile G. Managing end-stage renal disease in the elderly: state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013. [DOI: 10.2217/ahe.13.52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
15
|
Effects of cellular sensitization and donor age on acute rejection and graft function after deceased-donor kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2013; 95:1254-8. [PMID: 23603792 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e31828ad866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allografts from older donors may be more immunogenic than those from younger donors. Pretransplantation cellular sensitization may interact with advanced donor age to increase the risk of immune injury after deceased-donor kidney transplantation. METHODS The outcomes of 118 consecutive deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients with available pretransplantation donor-stimulated enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assays for interferon gamma were analyzed retrospectively to determine the impact of cellular sensitization and other clinical variables, including donor age, on the incidence of acute rejection (AR) in the first year after deceased-donor transplantation and on estimated glomerular filtration rate 12 months after transplantation. RESULTS The incidence of AR was higher in patients with positive pretransplantation ELISPOT assays versus those with negative assays (36% vs. 14%, P=0.009). Logistic regression indicated that the combination of donor age 50 years or older and a positive pretransplantation ELISPOT assay was more strongly associated with AR (odds ratio, 12.1; confidence interval, 1.1-133) than either variable alone. Estimated glomerular filtration 12 months after transplantation was highest in ELISPOT-negative patients receiving kidneys from donors younger than 50 years and lowest in ELISPOT-positive recipients with donors 50 years or older. CONCLUSION The combination of advanced donor age and pretransplantation cellular sensitization increases the risk of AR and poor graft function after deceased-donor kidney transplantation beyond the risk associated with each factor alone.
Collapse
|
16
|
Heldal K, Thorarinsdottir S, Hartmann A, Leivestad T, Reisæter AV, Foss AE, Midtvedt K. Induction with interleukin-2 antagonist for transplantation of kidneys from older deceased donors: an observational study. Transplant Res 2013; 2:11. [PMID: 23799993 PMCID: PMC3702442 DOI: 10.1186/2047-1440-2-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2013] [Accepted: 06/18/2013] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The most important limiting factor in kidney transplantation is the scarcity of donor organs. Consequently, there is an increased use worldwide of kidneys from older deceased donors. High donor age is a known risk factor for acute cellular rejection and premature graft failure, and the optimal immunosuppressive regimen in these circumstances remains to be established. Methods We investigated whether induction treatment with an interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptor antagonist improves graft survival and reduces rejection episodes in recipients of kidneys from deceased donors aged ≥ 60 years. Data were retrieved for all recipients transplanted at our center from 2004 to 2009 with a kidney from a deceased donor aged > 60 years. The outcome was compared between recipients treated with (IL-2 plus) or without (IL-2 minus) an IL-2 receptor antagonist. All recipients received a calcineurin inhibitor, steroids and mycophenolate. Results A total of 232 first-transplant recipients were included (IL-2 plus = 149, IL-2 minus = 83). IL-2 minus was associated with increased risk of early acute rejection (OR 2.42; 95% CI 1.25 to 4.68, P = 0.009) and steroid-resistant rejection (OR 8.04; 2.77 to 23.25, P< 0.001). IL-2 plus patients had superior two-year estimated uncensored (87% versus 70%, P = 0.001) and death-censored (95% versus 79%, P< 0.001) graft survival. Conclusions Induction treatment with IL-2 receptor antagonist was associated with a reduction in acute rejection episodes and improved two-year graft survival in patients transplanted with kidneys from older deceased donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian Heldal
- Clinic of Internal Medicine, Telemark Hospital, 3710, Skien, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Book BK, Volz MA, Ward EK, Eckert GJ, Pescovitz MD, Wiebke EA. Differences in alloimmune response between elderly and young mice. Transplant Proc 2013; 45:1838-41. [PMID: 23769054 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2012] [Accepted: 01/15/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The upper age of renal transplant recipients is rising on the transplant wait list. Age-dependent immune responsiveness to new antigens has not been thoroughly studied. This study used a mouse model of alloantibody response to neoalloantigen to study age-related differences. METHODS Transgenic huCD20-C57BL/6 mice were immunized intraperitoneally with BALB/c splenocytes (2.5 × 10(7)) at baseline and 1 month. Plasma samples were collected at baseline and 1 and 2 months after inoculation, frozen, and tested in a batch run (n = 22). Samples were tested by flow cytometric crossmatch for alloantibody with 2-fold serial dilution from neat to 1:640 using BALB/c splenocytes as targets. The sum of the median fluorescence intensity of the tested sample was calculated after subtracting that of an autologous serum control. Elderly mice (ELD; 42-103 weeks) at inoculation were compared with younger mice (YOU; 11-15 weeks). Statistical analysis was performed with 2-sample t test. RESULTS Mean age (weeks) between the groups was significantly different (ELD 69.3 ± 9.6 vs YOU 13.4 ± 1.4; P < .001). There was no difference in alloantibody between groups at baseline (ELD 0.7 ± 3.1 vs YOU 0.6 ± 0.4; P = .93). There was a higher alloantibody response at 1 month for YOU (52.9 ± 31.78) compared with ELD (5.12 ± 8.18). There was a greater difference after the 2 month (YOU 109.38 ± 66.43 vs ELD 21.97 ± 27.14; P < .0024). CONCLUSIONS There was a difference in response to new alloantigen in this animal model. Older animals had significantly decreased responses to new alloantigen stimulation 1 month after inoculation and even more profound decreases at 2 months compared with young animals. This model may be used to study differences in immune refractoriness to antigen signaling. It may be important to adapt clinical immunosuppression in the aged population to possible decreased responses to immune stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B K Book
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hatamizadeh P, Molnar MZ, Streja E, Lertdumrongluk P, Krishnan M, Kovesdy CP, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Recipient-related predictors of kidney transplantation outcomes in the elderly. Clin Transplant 2013; 27:436-43. [PMID: 23516994 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/13/2013] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is not clear whether in old people with end-stage renal disease kidney transplantation is superior to dialysis therapy. METHODS We compared mortality rates between kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and the general population across different age categories. We also examined patient and allograft survival in 15 667 elderly KTRs (65-<90 yr old, 36% female) within three age subgroups (65-<70, 70-<75, and ≥75 yr). RESULTS The rise in the relative risk of death in older age groups was substantially less in KTRs than in the general population, that is, 1.8 and 2.0 vs. 21.4 and 76.6 in those aged 65-<75 and ≥75 yr, respectively, compared with 15- to <65-yr-old people (reference group). In 65- to <70-yr-old KTRs, obesity (BMI>30 kg/m(2) ) was associated with 19% higher risk of graft failure (HR: 1.19 [1.07-1.33], p = 0.002). Diabetes was a predictor of worse patient survival in all age groups but poorer allograft outcome in the youngest age group (65-<70 yr old) only. None of the examined risk factors affected allograft outcome in the oldest group (≥75 yr old) although there was a 49% lower trend of graft failure in very old Hispanic recipients (HR: 0.51 [0.26-1.01], p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Kidney transplantation may attenuate the age-associated increase in mortality, and its superior survival gain is most prominent in the oldest recipients (≥75 yr old). The potential protective effect of kidney transplantation on longevity in the elderly deserves further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parta Hatamizadeh
- Harold Simmons Center for Chronic Disease Research & Epidemiology, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, CA92868-3217, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
The world population is rapidly growing and ageing at a pace that is projected to continue for at least three decades. This shift towards an older populace has invariably increased the number of individuals with diseases related to ageing, such as chronic kidney disease. The increase in chronic kidney disease is associated with a growing number of elderly patients receiving kidney transplants. Understanding how the immune system changes with increasing age will help to define the risks of rejection and infection in the elderly population and will focus attention on the need for individualized immunosuppression for patients in this age group. This Review addresses what is currently known about ageing and the immune system, highlighting age-related changes that affect the outcome of transplantation in elderly individuals. The need for new strategies to improve outcomes in this growing population of elderly renal transplant recipients is also emphasized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dianne McKay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology-Hypertension, University of California San Diego, 3350 La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, CA 92161, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abecassis M, Bridges N, Clancy C, Dew M, Eldadah B, Englesbe M, Flessner M, Frank J, Friedewald J, Gill J, Gries C, Halter J, Hartmann E, Hazzard W, Horne F, Hosenpud J, Jacobson P, Kasiske B, Lake J, Loomba R, Malani P, Moore T, Murray A, Nguyen MH, Powe N, Reese P, Reynolds H, Samaniego M, Schmader K, Segev D, Shah A, Singer L, Sosa J, Stewart Z, Tan J, Williams W, Zaas D, High K. Solid-organ transplantation in older adults: current status and future research. Am J Transplant 2012; 12:2608-22. [PMID: 22958872 PMCID: PMC3459231 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04245.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
An increasing number of patients older than 65 years are referred for and have access to organ transplantation, and an increasing number of older adults are donating organs. Although short-term outcomes are similar in older versus younger transplant recipients, older donor or recipient age is associated with inferior long-term outcomes. However, age is often a proxy for other factors that might predict poor outcomes more strongly and better identify patients at risk for adverse events. Approaches to transplantation in older adults vary across programs, but despite recent gains in access and the increased use of marginal organs, older patients remain less likely than other groups to receive a transplant, and those who do are highly selected. Moreover, few studies have addressed geriatric issues in transplant patient selection or management, or the implications on health span and disability when patients age to late life with a transplanted organ. This paper summarizes a recent trans-disciplinary workshop held by ASP, in collaboration with NHLBI, NIA, NIAID, NIDDK and AGS, to address issues related to kidney, liver, lung, or heart transplantation in older adults and to propose a research agenda in these areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Abecassis
- Departments of Surgery and Microbiology-Immunology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
| | - N.D. Bridges
- Transplantation Immunobiology Branch and Clinical Transplantation Section, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
| | | | - M.A. Dew
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh
| | - B. Eldadah
- Division of Geriatrics and Clinical Gerontology, National Institute on Aging
| | - M.J. Englesbe
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School
| | - M.F. Flessner
- Division of Kidney, Urologic, and Hematologic Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
| | - J.C. Frank
- Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles
| | - J. Friedewald
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Northwestern University
| | - J Gill
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia
| | - C. Gries
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
| | - J.B. Halter
- Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School
| | | | - W.R. Hazzard
- Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Washington, VA Puget Sound Health Care System
| | | | | | - P. Jacobson
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota
| | | | - J. Lake
- Liver Transplant Program, University of Minnesota
| | - R. Loomba
- University of California, San Diego School of Medicine
| | - P.N. Malani
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School
| | - T.M. Moore
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
| | - A. Murray
- Division of Geriatrics, University of Minnesota
| | | | - N.R. Powe
- University of California, San Francisco
| | | | | | | | - K.E. Schmader
- GRECC, Durham VA Medical Center and Division of Geriatric Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine
| | - D.L. Segev
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - A.S. Shah
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - L.G. Singer
- Toronto Lung Transplant Program, University of Toronto
| | - J.A. Sosa
- Divisions of Endocrine Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine
| | | | - J.C. Tan
- Adult Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Program, Stanford University
| | - W.W. Williams
- Harvard University and Massachusetts General Hospital
| | - D.W. Zaas
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine
| | - K.P. High
- Wake Forest School of Medicine,To Whom Correspondence Should be Sent: Kevin P. High, M.D., M.S., Professor of Medicine and Translational Science, Chief, Section on Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston Salem, NC 27157-1042, Phone: (336) 716-4584, Fax: (336) 716-3825,
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Calcineurin inhibitors and NFAT-regulated gene expression. Clin Chim Acta 2012; 413:1379-86. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.09.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2011] [Revised: 09/21/2011] [Accepted: 09/27/2011] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
22
|
Kidney function following nephrectomy: Similitude and discrepancies between kidney cancer and living donation. Urol Oncol 2012; 30:482-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2010] [Revised: 04/09/2010] [Accepted: 04/12/2010] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
23
|
Augustine JJ, Hricik DE. T-cell immune monitoring by the ELISPOT assay for interferon gamma. Clin Chim Acta 2012; 413:1359-63. [PMID: 22732764 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2011] [Revised: 03/08/2012] [Accepted: 03/08/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay for interferon gamma has been available for more than twenty years and has been used for a number of applications, including the monitoring of T cell immunity in solid organ transplant recipients. Studies from single centers indicate that heightened T cell alloreactivity measured with this assay correlates with acute and chronic rejection and with poor long-term allograft function. The assay has been used not only to assess T cell reactivity after transplantation, but also as a tool for assessing immune risk prior to transplantation. Additional work is needed to validate the assay in larger multicenter clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua J Augustine
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44116, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Utilization rates of organs from elderly donors have shown the highest proportional increase during the last decade. Clinical reports support the concept of transplanting older organs. However, the engraftment of such organs has been linked to accelerated immune responses based on ageing changes per se and a proinflammatory environment subsequent to compromised injury and repair mechanism. We analyzed the clinical consequences of transplanting older donor organs and present mechanistic aspects correlating age, injury repair and effects on host immunoresponsiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Oberhuber
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Long-Term Outcome in Kidney Transplant Recipients Over 70 Years in the Eurotransplant Senior Kidney Transplant Program: A Single Center Experience. Transplantation 2011; 92:210-6. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e318222ca2f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
26
|
Timsit MO, Yuan X, Floerchinger B, Ge X, Tullius SG. Consequences of transplant quality on chronic allograft nephropathy. Kidney Int 2011:S54-8. [PMID: 21116319 DOI: 10.1038/ki.2010.424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Using kidneys from expanded-criteria donors to alleviate organ shortage has raised concern on reduced transplant outcomes. In this paper, we review how critical donor-related factors such as donor age, brain death, and consequences of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) determine graft quality and impact chronic allograft nephropathy. We propose that combinatorial effects of organ-intrinsic features associated with increasing age and unspecific injuries related to brain death and IRI will impact innate and adaptive immune responses. Future research will need to explore avenues to optimize donor management, organ preservation, adapted immunosuppressive strategies, as well as modifications of the allocation of suboptimal allografts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc-Olivier Timsit
- Division of Transplant Surgery and Transplant Surgery Research Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
The combination of donor and recipient age is critical in determining host immunoresponsiveness and renal transplant outcome. Ann Surg 2010; 252:662-74. [PMID: 20881773 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181f65c7d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the interaction of donor and recipient age on transplant outcome and immune response. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA The age of donor and recipient is becoming increasingly important in organ transplantation. We tested the relevance and consequences of recipient and donor age on immunoresponsiveness and transplant outcome in a uni- and multilateral cohort analysis. METHODS We obtained and analyzed data from 108,188 recipients of deceased donor kidneys of the United Network for Organ Sharing database transplanted between 1995 and 2008. Univariate analysis of allograft and patient survival was calculated by Kaplan Meyer. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox Proportional Hazards method. Data were assessed and compared by decades of increasing donor and recipient age with and without censoring transplant loss for death with a functioning graft. This approach allowed a detailed analysis of interacting factors. RESULTS Transplant survival was lowest in elderly recipients. However, when the analysis was censored for patient's death with a functioning kidney transplant, survival improved incrementally with each decade of increasing recipient age. This was even more surprising as older recipients had received less well-matched organs of poorer quality. The frequency of acute rejection decreased dramatically with increasing age, emphasizing the effect of age on the vigor of the recipient's immune responses. In contrast, increasing donor age was associated with more frequent acute rejection rates. The effects of donor and recipient age in combination demonstrated that grafts of older donors fared significantly better in older recipients. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that increasing recipient age is associated with an improved transplant survival, lower rates of rejection, and superior outcome of older donor organs. Physiological and/or immunologic aspects of organ and recipient age seem to determine, at least in part, the success of renal transplantation.
Collapse
|
28
|
Heldal K, Hartmann A, Grootendorst DC, de Jager DJ, Leivestad T, Foss A, Midtvedt K. Benefit of kidney transplantation beyond 70 years of age. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 25:1680-7. [PMID: 20038521 PMCID: PMC2856560 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfp681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Kidney transplantation generally improves long-term survival in patients with end-stage renal disease. However, in patients older than 70 years of age, only limited data are available that directly compare the potential survival benefit of transplantation versus dialysis. Methods. All patients aged above 70 years who started dialysis between 1990 and 2005 and were waitlisted for kidney transplantation were included in the study. They were categorized according to time periods of inclusion (1990–99 vs 2000–05). Survival rates of altogether 286 dialysis patients were analyzed with a Kaplan–Meier model, as well as with a time-dependent Cox model. Comparisons were made between those who received a transplant and those who did not, and further between the two time periods. Results. Median age at inclusion was 73.6 years (interquartile range 72.3–75.6). Two hundred and thirty-three patients (81%) received a kidney transplant during follow-up. Transplant recipients experienced an increased mortality in the first year after transplantation when compared to waitlisted patients. Patients starting dialysis between 1990 and 1999 had no significant long-term benefit of transplantation; HR for death 1.01 (0.58–1.75). In contrast, there was a substantial long-term benefit of transplantation among those starting dialysis after 2000; HR for death 0.40 (0.19–0.83), P = 0.014. Conclusions. Survival after kidney transplantation in patients over 70 years has improved during the last decade and offers a survival advantage over dialysis treatment. Our experience supports the use of kidney transplantation in this age group if an increased early post-operative risk is accepted. This transplant policy may be challenged for priority reasons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian Heldal
- Section of Nephrology and Endocrinology, Clinic of Internal Medicine, Sykehuset Telemark, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kuypers DRJ. Immunotherapy in elderly transplant recipients: a guide to clinically significant drug interactions. Drugs Aging 2009; 26:715-37. [PMID: 19728747 DOI: 10.2165/11316480-000000000-00000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Currently, >50% of candidates for solid organ transplantation in Europe and the US are aged >50 years while approximately 15% of potential recipients are aged >or=65 years. Elderly transplant candidates are characterized by specific co-morbidity profiles that compromise graft and patient outcome after transplantation. The presence of coronary artery or peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, history of malignancy, chronic obstructive lung disease or diabetes mellitus further increases the early post-transplant mortality risk in elderly recipients, with infections and cardiovascular complications as the leading causes of death. Not only are elderly patients more prone to developing drug-related adverse effects, but they are also more susceptible to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions because of polypharmacy. The majority of currently used immunosuppressant drugs in organ transplantation are metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) or uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases and are substrates of the multidrug resistance (MDR)-1 transporter P-glycoprotein, the MDR-associated protein 2 or the canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter, which predisposes these immunosuppressant compounds to specific interactions with commonly prescribed drugs. In addition, important drug interactions between immunosuppressant drugs have been identified and require attention when choosing an appropriate immunosuppressant drug regimen for the frail elderly organ recipient. An age-related 34% decrease in total body clearance of the calcineurin inhibitor ciclosporin was observed in elderly renal recipients (aged >65 years) compared with younger patients, while older recipients also had 44% higher intracellular lymphocyte ciclosporin concentrations. Similarly, using a Bayesian approach, an inverse relationship was noted between sirolimus clearance and age in stable kidney recipients. Ciclosporin and tacrolimus have distinct pharmacokinetics, but both are metabolized by intestinal and hepatic CYP3A4/3A5 and transported across the cell membrane by P-glycoprotein. The most common drug interactions with ciclosporin are therefore also observed with tacrolimus, but the two drugs do not interact identically when administered with CYP3A inhibitors or inducers. The strongest effects on calcineurin-inhibitor disposition are observed with azole antifungals, macrolide antibacterials, rifampicin, calcium channel antagonists, grapefruit juice, St John's wort and protease inhibitors. Drug interactions with mycophenolic acids occur mainly through inhibition of their enterohepatic recirculation, either by interference with the intestinal flora (antibacterials) or by limiting drug absorption (resins and binders). Rifampicin causes a reduction in mycophenolic acid exposure probably through induction of uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases. Proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs) such as sirolimus and everolimus are substrates of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein and have a macrolide structure very similar to tacrolimus, which explains why common drug interactions with PSIs are comparable to those with calcineurin inhibitors. Ciclosporin, in contrast to tacrolimus, inhibits the enterohepatic recirculation of mycophenolic acids, resulting in significantly lower concentrations and hence risk of underexposure. Therefore, when switching from tacrolimus to ciclosporin and vice versa or when reducing or withdrawing ciclosporin, this interaction needs to be taken into account. The combination of ciclosporin with PSIs requires dose reductions of both drugs because of a synergistic interaction that causes nephrotoxicity when left uncorrected. Conversely, when switching between calcineurin inhibitors, intensified monitoring of PSI concentrations is mandatory. Increasing age is associated with structural and functional changes in body compartments and tissues that alter absorptive capacity, volume of distribution, hepatic metabolic function and renal function and ultimately drug disposition. While these age-related changes are well-known, few specific effects of the latter on immunosuppressant drug metabolism have been reported. Therefore, more clinical data from elderly organ recipients are urgently required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk R J Kuypers
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Induction of chronic renal allograft dysfunction in a rat model with complete and exclusive MHC incompatibility. Transpl Immunol 2009; 22:137-43. [PMID: 19815070 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2009.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2009] [Revised: 09/16/2009] [Accepted: 09/22/2009] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Chronic allograft dysfunction is one of the most important reasons for late graft loss after renal transplantation. Its etiology is multifactorial and combines immunological as well as non-immunological mechanisms. It is known from large registry data that MHC mismatches are inversely correlated to long term allograft survival. Although this is a well known aspect, the mechanisms of MHC-driven graft damage and the impact of other immunological factors leading to chronic rejection are poorly understood. In patients it is impossible to study MHC mismatches without considering non-MHC differences. Further more common animal models for chronic rejection are all characterized by non-MHC as well as MHC disparities. To exclusively study MHC mediated immunoresponses we established a rat model of renal transplantation using congenic rat strains differing in their entire MHC class I and class II, but sharing the genetic background of the LEW rat. After an initial short term of immunosuppression all animals developed renal impairment with severe albuminuria. Half of the animals died of renal failure in week 7 to 14 and showed pathological characteristics of chronic allograft damage including IF/TA and severe glomerulopathy. The majority of these recipients developed circulating donor-specific MHC alloantibodies. Allografts were significantly infiltrated with T-cells, macrophages and NK-cells. We established a MHC congenic rat model to investigate immunological mechanisms of chronic renal allograft rejection exclusively induced by a complete MHC mismatch. We demonstrated humoral as well as cellular immunoresponses leading to chronic allograft loss in 50% of animals.
Collapse
|