1
|
Husain SA, King KL, Adler JT, Mohan S, Perotte R. Impact of Extending Eligibility for Reinstatement of Waiting Time After Early Allograft Failure: A Decision Analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2022; 79:354-361. [PMID: 34562524 PMCID: PMC8881308 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.07.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE The shortage of deceased donor kidneys identified for potential transplantation in the United States is exacerbated by a high proportion of deceased donor kidneys being discarded after procurement. We estimated the impact of a policy proposal aiming to increase organ utilization by extending eligibility for waiting time reinstatement for recipients experiencing early allograft failure after transplantation. STUDY DESIGN Decision analysis informed by clinical registry data. SETTING & POPULATION We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data to identify 76,044 deceased-donor kidneys procured in the United States from 2013 to 2017, 80% of which were transplanted and 20% discarded. INTERVENTION Extend waiting time reinstatement for recipients experiencing allograft failure from the current 90 days to 1 year after transplantation. OUTCOME Net impact to the waitlist, defined as the estimated number of additional transplants minus estimated increase in waiting list reinstatements. MODEL, PERSPECTIVE, & TIMEFRAME We estimated (1) the number of additional deceased donor kidneys that would be transplanted if there was a 5%-25% relative reduction in discards, and (2) the number of recipients who would regain waiting time under a 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month reinstatement policy. RESULTS Reinstating a waiting time for recipients experiencing allograft failure up to 1 year after transplantation yielded more additional transplants than growth in additions to the waiting list for all model assumptions except the combination of a very low relative reduction in discards (5%) and a very high failure rate of transplanted kidneys that would previously have been discarded (≥5 times the rate of currently transplanted kidneys). LIMITATIONS Lack of empirical evidence supporting the proposed impact of such a policy change. CONCLUSIONS A policy change reinstating waiting time for deceased donor kidneys recipients with allograft failure up to 1 year after transplantation should explored as a decision science-based intervention to improve organ utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Ali Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY
| | - Kristen L. King
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY
| | - Joel T. Adler
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA,Center for Surgery and Public Health at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Rimma Perotte
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ,Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eggenhofer E, Groell A, Junger H, Kasi A, Kroemer A, Geissler EK, Schlitt HJ, Scherer MN. Steatotic Livers Are More Susceptible to Ischemia Reperfusion Damage after Transplantation and Show Increased γδ T Cell Infiltration. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:2036. [PMID: 33670793 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22042036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LTx) is often the only possible therapy for many end-stage liver diseases, but successful long-term transplant outcomes are limited by multiple factors, including ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI). This situation is aggravated by a shortage of transplantable organs, thus encouraging the use of inferior quality organs. Here, we have investigated early hepatic IRI in a retrospective, exploratory, monocentric case-control study considering organ marginality. We analyzed standard LTx biopsies from 46 patients taken at the end of cold organ preparation and two hours after reperfusion, and we showed that early IRI was present after two hours in 63% of cases. Looking at our data in general, in accordance with Eurotransplant criteria, a marginal transplant was allocated at our institution in about 54% of cases. We found that patients with a marginal-organ LTx showing evidence of IRI had a significantly worse one-year survival rate (51% vs. 75%). As we saw in our study cohort, the marginality of these livers was almost entirely due to steatosis. In contrast, survival rates in patients receiving a non-marginal transplant were not influenced by the presence or absence of IRI. Poorer outcomes in marginal organs prompted us to examine pre- and post-reperfusion biopsies, and it was revealed that transplants with IRI demonstrated significantly greater T cell infiltration. Molecular analyses showed that higher mRNA expression levels of CXCL-1, CD3 and TCRγ locus genes were found in IRI livers. We therefore conclude that the marginality of an organ, namely steatosis, exacerbates early IRI by enhancing effector immune cell infiltration. Preemptive strategies targeting immune pathways could increase the safety of using marginal organs for LTx.
Collapse
|
3
|
von Moos S, Akalin E, Mas V, Mueller TF. Assessment of Organ Quality in Kidney Transplantation by Molecular Analysis and Why It May Not Have Been Achieved, Yet. Front Immunol 2020; 11:833. [PMID: 32477343 PMCID: PMC7236771 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Donor organ shortage, growing waiting lists and substantial organ discard rates are key problems in transplantation. The critical importance of organ quality in determining long-term function is becoming increasingly clear. However, organ quality is difficult to predict. The lack of good measures of organ quality is a serious challenge in terms of acceptance and allocation of an organ. The underlying review summarizes currently available methods used to assess donor organ quality such as histopathology, clinical scores and machine perfusion characteristics with special focus on molecular analyses of kidney quality. The majority of studies testing molecular markers of organ quality focused on identifying organs at risk for delayed graft function, yet without prediction of long-term graft outcome. Recently, interest has emerged in looking for molecular markers associated with biological age to predict organ quality. However, molecular gene sets have not entered the clinical routine or impacted discard rates so far. The current review critically discusses the potential reasons why clinically applicable molecular quality assessment using early kidney biopsies might not have been achieved yet. Besides a critical analysis of the inherent limitations of surrogate markers used for organ quality, i.e., delayed graft function, the intrinsic methodological limitations of studies assessing organ quality will be discussed. These comprise the multitude of unpredictable hits as well as lack of markers of nephron mass, functional reserve and regenerative capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seraina von Moos
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Enver Akalin
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, New York City, NY, United States
| | - Valeria Mas
- Division Transplantation Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Thomas F Mueller
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kvietkauskas M, Leber B, Strupas K, Stiegler P, Schemmer P. Machine Perfusion of Extended Criteria Donor Organs: Immunological Aspects. Front Immunol 2020; 11:192. [PMID: 32180769 PMCID: PMC7057848 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to higher vulnerability and immunogenicity of extended criteria donor (ECD) organs used for organ transplantation (Tx), the discovery of new treatment strategies, involving tissue allorecognition pathways, is important. The implementation of machine perfusion (MP) led to improved estimation of the organ quality and introduced the possibility to achieve graft reconditioning prior to Tx. A significant number of experimental and clinical trials demonstrated increasing support for MP as a promising method of ECD organ preservation compared to classical static cold storage. MP reduced ischemia-reperfusion injury resulting in the protection from inadequate activation of innate immunity. However, there are no general agreements on MP protocols, and clinical application is limited. The objective of this comprehensive review is to summarize literature on immunological effects of MP of ECD organs based on experimental studies and clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mindaugas Kvietkauskas
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.,Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Bettina Leber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Philipp Stiegler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Peter Schemmer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sommer W, Kirschner H, Ius F, Salman J, Siemeni T, Bobylev D, Avsar M, Kuehn C, Greer M, Gottlieb J, Rahmel A, Welte T, Haverich A, Tudorache I, Warnecke G. Transplantation of donor lungs with pulmonary embolism - a retrospective study. Transpl Int 2019; 32:658-667. [PMID: 30712278 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2018] [Revised: 10/29/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Lung transplantation from donors with fulminant pulmonary arterial embolism as a cause of death remains controversial. An analysis was performed comparing preoperative characteristics and outcomes of 25 donors with a primary diagnosis of pulmonary arterial embolism to 1085 recipients of donor lungs without pulmonary arterial embolism. No early functional impairment of donor lungs with pulmonary embolism was detectable as depicted by the incidence of primary graft dysfunction immediately after surgery (P = 0.66), 24 (P = 0.79), 48 (P = 0.99) and 72 h (P = 0.99) after transplantation. Pulmonary function testing at 1 year (P = 0.003) and at last outpatient control (P < 0.05) showed superior results in the cohort receiving lungs from donors with pulmonary embolism. Incidence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) showed no difference within the first year after lung transplantation, however, 5 year-CLAD free survival was superior in recipients (70.4% vs. 55.1%, P = 0.006) of donor lungs with pulmonary embolism. Overall survival was similar in both groups. Lungs from donors with fulminant pulmonary embolism prior to brain death can safely be used for lung transplantation without impairing postoperative outcomes. Lung function testing shows favorable midterm results in recipients of donor lungs with pulmonary embolism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wiebke Sommer
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Member of the German Centre for Lung Research, BREATH, Gießen, Germany
| | - Helmut Kirschner
- Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation (DSO), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Fabio Ius
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jawad Salman
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thierry Siemeni
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Dmitry Bobylev
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Murat Avsar
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christian Kuehn
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Mark Greer
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jens Gottlieb
- Member of the German Centre for Lung Research, BREATH, Gießen, Germany.,Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Axel Rahmel
- Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation (DSO), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Tobias Welte
- Member of the German Centre for Lung Research, BREATH, Gießen, Germany.,Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Axel Haverich
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Member of the German Centre for Lung Research, BREATH, Gießen, Germany
| | - Igor Tudorache
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Gregor Warnecke
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Member of the German Centre for Lung Research, BREATH, Gießen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|