Acute Humoral Rejection in a Lung Recipient: Reversion With Bortezomib

Carfilzomib versus rituximab for treatment of de novo donor-specific antibodies in lung transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

De novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) increase the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Both carfilzomib (CFZ) and rituximab (RTX) lower the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of DSAs, but comparative data are lacking. We compared CLAD-free survival and the degree and duration of DSA depletion after treatment of LTRs with CFZ or RTX.

METHODS

LTRs that received CFZ or RTX for DSA depletion between 08/01/2015 and 08/31/2020 were included. The primary outcome was CLAD-free survival. Secondary outcomes were change in MFI at corresponding loci within 6 months of treatment (ΔMFI), time to DSA rebound, and change in % predicted FEV₁ 6 months after treatment (ΔFEV₁).

RESULTS

Forty-four LTRs were identified, 7 of whom had ≥2 drug events; therefore, 53 drug events were divided into 2 groups, CFZ (n = 17) and RTX (n = 36). Use of plasmapheresis, immunoglobulin, and mycophenolate augmentation was equivalent in both groups. CLAD-free survival with a single RTX event was superior to that after ≥2 drug events (p = 0.001) but comparable to that with a single CFZ event (p = 0.399). Both drugs significantly lowered the MFI at DQ locus, and the median ΔMFI was comparable. Compared to the RTX group, the CFZ group had a shorter median interval to DSA rebound (p = 0.015) and a lower ΔFEV₁ at 6 months (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Although both CFZ and RTX reduced the MFI of circulating DSAs, RTX prolonged the time to DSA rebound. Despite more pronounced improvement in FEV₁ with RTX, comparable CLAD-free survival between the 2 groups suggests that both drugs offer a reasonable treatment strategy for DSAs in LTRs.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection Management Following Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is described in other solid organ transplant populations, the literature describing the management following lung transplantation is limited.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the management strategies of AMR in lung transplant recipients.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study described the management of AMR in adult lung transplant recipients who received treatment with rabbit antithymocyte globulin, bortezomib, rituximab, intravenous immune globulin (IVIG), and/or plasmapheresis between September 2015 and June 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 270 medication orders for 55 patient admissions were included in the primary outcome analysis. The most commonly used regimen consisted of IVIG, plasmapheresis, and rituximab (49.1%; n = 27), followed by IVIG and plasmapheresis alone (27.3%, n = 15). A total of 51 patients (93%) received plasmapheresis as part of their AMR treatment, with a median of 4 [3, 5] sessions per encounter; 86% of patients with positive donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) had a reduction in DSAs following AMR treatment. Overall, 23.5% of patients had noted allograft failure or need for retransplantation. A total of 10 patients died during the AMR treatment hospital admission, and an additional 11 patients died within 1 year of the initial encounter.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

This represents the largest report describing management strategies of AMR in lung transplant recipients. Although practice varied, the most commonly used regimen consisted of plasmapheresis, IVIG, and rituximab.

New frontiers in immunosuppression

Immunosuppressive therapy is arguably the most important component of medical care after lung transplantation. The goal of immunosuppression is to prevent acute and chronic rejection while maximizing patient survival and long-term allograft function. However, the benefits of immunosuppressive therapy must be balanced against the side effects and major toxicities of these medications. Immunosuppressive agents can be classified as induction agents, maintenance therapies, treatments for acute rejection and chronic rejection and antibody directed therapies. Although induction therapy remains an area of controversy in lung transplantation, it is still used in the majority of transplant centers. On the other hand, maintenance immunosuppression is less contentious; but, unfortunately, since the creation of three-drug combination therapy, including a glucocorticoid, calcineurin inhibitor and anti-metabolite, there have been relatively modest improvements in chronic maintenance immunosuppressive regimens. The presence of HLA antibodies in transplant candidates and development of de novo antibodies after transplantation remain a major therapeutic challenge before and after lung transplantation. In this chapter we review the medications used for induction and maintenance immunosuppression along with their efficacy and side effect profiles. We also review strategies and evidence for HLA desensitization prior to lung transplantation and management of de novo antibody formation after transplant. Finally, we review immune tolerance and the future of lung transplantation to limit the toxicities of conventional immunosuppressive therapy.

Antibody-mediated rejection of the lung: A consensus report of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a recognized cause of allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients. Unlike AMR in other solid-organ transplant recipients, there are no standardized diagnostic criteria or an agreed-upon definition. Hence, a working group was created by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation with the aim of determining criteria for pulmonary AMR and establishing a definition. Diagnostic criteria and a working consensus definition were established. Key diagnostic criteria include the presence of antibodies directed toward donor human leukocyte antigens and characteristic lung histology with or without evidence of complement 4d within the graft. Exclusion of other causes of allograft dysfunction increases confidence in the diagnosis but is not essential. Pulmonary AMR may be clinical (allograft dysfunction which can be asymptomatic) or sub-clinical (normal allograft function). This consensus definition will have clinical, therapeutic and research implications.

Lung Transplantation

The therapeutic options for patients with advanced pulmonary parenchymal or vascular disorders are currently limited. Lung transplantation remains one of the few viable interventions, but on account of the insufficient donor pool only a minority of these patients actually undergo the procedure each year. Following transplantation there are a number of early and late allograft complications such as primary graft dysfunction, allograft rejection, infection, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and late injury that is now classified as chronic lung allograft dysfunction. The pathologist plays an essential role in the diagnosis and classification of these myriad complications. Although the transplant procedures are performed in selected centers patients typically return to their local centers. When complications arise it is often the responsibility of the local pathologist to evaluate specimens. Therefore familiarity with the pathology of lung transplantation is important.

Immunosuppression in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation can be a life-saving procedure for those with end-stage lung diseases. Unfortunately, long term graft and patient survival are limited by both acute and chronic allograft rejection, with a median survival of just over 6 years. Immunosuppressive regimens are employed to reduce the rate of rejection, and while protocols vary from center to center, conventional maintenance therapy consists of triple drug therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus), antiproliferative agents [azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate, sirolimus (srl), everolimus (evl)], and corticosteroids (CS). Roughly 50% of lung transplant centers also utilize induction therapy, with polyclonal antibody preparations [equine or rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)], interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (IL2RAs) (daclizumab or basiliximab), or alemtuzumab. This review summarizes these agents and the data surrounding their use in lung transplantation, as well as additional common and novel therapies in lung transplantation. Despite the progression of the management of lung transplant recipients, they continue to be at high risk of treatment-related complications, and poor graft and patient survival. Randomized clinical trials are needed to allow for the development of better agents, regimens and techniques to address above mentioned issues and reduce morbidity and mortality among lung transplant recipients.

Immunosuppression and allograft rejection following lung transplantation: evidence to date

The enduring success of lung transplantation is built on the use of immunosuppressive drugs to stop the immune system from rejecting the newly transplanted lung allograft. Most patients receive a triple-drug maintenance immunosuppressive regimen consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative and corticosteroids. Induction therapy with either an antilymphocyte monoclonal or an interleukin-2 receptor antagonist are prescribed by many centres aiming to achieve rapid inhibition of recently activated and potentially alloreactive T lymphocytes. Despite this generic approach acute rejection episodes remain common, mandating further fine-tuning and augmentation of the immunosuppressive regimen. While there has been a trend away from cyclosporine and azathioprine towards a preference for tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, this has not translated into significant protection from the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, the main barrier to the long-term success of lung transplantation. This article reviews the problem of lung allograft rejection and the evidence for immunosuppressive regimens used both in the short- and long-term in patients undergoing lung transplantation.

Proteasome inhibitors as immunosuppressants: biological rationale and clinical experience

Accumulating evidence supports the potential of proteasome inhibitors as immunosuppressants. Proteasome inhibitors interfere with antigen processing and presentation, as well as with the signaling cascades involved in immune cell function and survival. Both myeloma and healthy plasma cells appear to be highly susceptible to proteasome inhibitors due to impaired proteasomal activity in both cell types. As a consequence, these agents can be used to reduce antibody production and thus prevent antibody-induced tissue damage. Several clinical studies have explored the potential of bortezomib, a peptide boronate proteasome inhibitor, for treating immune disorders, such as antibody-mediated organ rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), with encouraging results. Here, we discuss the biological rationale for the use of proteasome inhibitors as immunosuppressive agents and review the clinical experience with bortezomib in immune-mediated diseases.

Time to explore preventive and novel therapies for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) is performed to treat otherwise incurable and fatal diseases, transplantation itself can lead to life-threatening complications due to organ damage. Pulmonary complications remain a significant barrier to the success of allo-HSCT. Lung injury, a frequent complication after allo-HSCT, and noninfectious pulmonary deaths account for a significant proportion of non-relapse mortality. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is a common and potentially devastating complication. BOS is now considered a diagnostic criterion of chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGVHD), and National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus has been published to establish guidelines for diagnosis and monitoring of BOS. It usually occurs within the first 2 years but may develop as late as 5 years after transplantation. Recent prevalence estimates suggest that BOS is likely underdiagnosed, and when severe BOS does occur, current treatments have been largely ineffective. Prevention and effective novel approaches remain the primary tools in the clinician's arsenal in managing BOS. This article provides an overview of the currently available and novel strategies for BOS, and we also discuss specific preventive interventions to reduce severe BOS after allo-HSCT. Therapeutic trials continue to be needed for this orphan disease.

Proteasome inhibitor-based therapy for antibody-mediated rejection

The development of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSAs) following renal transplantation significantly reduces long-term renal graft function and survival. The traditional therapies for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) have provided inconsistent results and transient effects that may be due to a failure to deplete mature antibody-producing plasma cells. Proteasome inhibition (PI) is a novel AMR therapy that deletes plasma cells. Initial reports of PI-based AMR treatment in refractory rejection demonstrated the ability of bortezomib to deplete plasma cells producing DSA, reduce DSA levels, provide histological improvement or resolution, and improve renal allograft function. These results have subsequently been confirmed in a multicenter collaborative study. PI has also been shown to provide effective primary AMR therapy in case reports. Recent studies have demonstrated that PI therapy results in differential responses in early and late post-transplant AMR. Additional randomized studies are evaluating the role of PI in transplant induction, acute AMR, and chronic rejection in renal transplantation. An important theoretical advantage of PI-based regimens is derived from several potential strategies for achievement of synergy.

The state of therapy for removal of alloantibody producing plasma cells in transplantation

The current evidence clearly points towards donor specific alloantibody as a major cause of allograft loss. In order to mitigate allograft loss due to antibodies, treating the source of antibody production, the plasma cell is essential. Therapies that lack effect on the terminally differentiated (long-lived) plasma cell, such as rituximab, intravenous immune globulin and, plasmapheresis were the therapies used prior to 2007. In studies, their ability to remove antibody was found to be incomplete and/or cost prohibitive. In 2007, a proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, was used for the first time in transplant due to its ability to deplete plasma cells. Through multiple case reports it has demonstrated consistent success in DSA reduction and removal, with only a few reports of failure to date. This review discusses the plasma cell, the alloantibody, and the current data supporting proteasome inhibitor use in transplant.

Proteasome inhibitor treatment of antibody-mediated allograft rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bortezomib is a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor that was originally Food and Drug Administration approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma. In the past few years, off-label use in solid organ transplant recipients has demonstrated its ability to provide plasma cell-targeted therapy in humans. The purpose of this review is to provide an update of recent basic science and clinical results with bortezomib in treating antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) that occurs in solid organ transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Proteasome inhibitor therapy for AMR in kidney transplant recipients is effective both as primary and as rescue therapy. Optimal responses with proteasome inhibitor therapy are obtained when AMR is diagnosed promptly and early in the posttransplant period. However, proteasome inhibitor therapy for late AMR (i.e., occurring 6 months or later posttransplant) provides less predictable results, likely due to the existence of a substantial bone marrow niche-resident long-lived plasma cell population. Proteasome inhibitor therapy has also recently been shown to provide effective therapy for AMR in heart, and also, transplant recipients.

SUMMARY

Proteasome inhibitor therapy with bortezomib provides effective treatment for AMR in solid organ transplant recipients. As the first plasma cell-targeted therapy, proteasome inhibitor therapy provides the additional advantage of opening new possibilities for biologically defined plasma cell-targeted therapies.

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome: the final frontier for lung transplantation

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is a form of chronic lung allograft dysfunction that affects a majority of lung transplant recipients and is the principal factor limiting long-term transplant survival. BOS is characterized by progressive airflow obstruction unexplained by acute rejection, infection, or other coexistent condition. Although BOS is a proven useful clinical syndrome that identifies patients at increased risk for death, its clinical course and underlying causative factors are now recognized to be increasingly heterogeneous. Regardless of the clinical history, the primary pathologic correlate of BOS is bronchiolitis obliterans, a condition of intraluminal airway fibrosis. This article highlights the body of developing research illustrating the mechanisms by which BOS is mediated, including alloimmune reactivity, the emerging roles of humoral and autoimmunity, activation of innate immune cells, and response to nonimmune-related allograft insults, such as infection and aspiration. In addition, we underscore emerging clinical implications and promising future translational research directions that have the potential to advance our knowledge and improve patient outcomes.

Acute allograft rejection: cellular and humoral processes

Acute cellular rejection affects greater than one-third of lung transplant recipients. Alloreactive T-lymphocytes constitute the basis of lung allograft rejection. Recent evidence supports a more complex immune response to the allograft. Interaction between recipient genetics, immunosuppression therapies, and allograft environmental exposures likely contribute to high rejection rates after lung transplantation. A greater understanding of the heterogeneous mechanisms of lung rejection is critical to developing effective therapies that target the precise pathophysiology of the disease and ultimately improve long-term lung transplant outcomes.

Protective immunity remains intact after antibody removal by means of proteasome inhibition

BACKGROUND

Proteasome inhibition abrogates donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody (DSA) in patients posttransplant. However, its effects on protective humoral immunity to vaccine antigens remain unknown. Herein, we report on bortezomib's safety regarding protective immunity in patients who have experienced HLA antibody reduction/removal.

METHODS

Thirteen living donor renal transplant patients were treated with bortezomib one to two cycles (1.3 mg/m² × 4 doses) and plasmapheresis in 2008 to remove HLA antibodies posttransplant. Serial measurements of HLA antibody were conducted weekly before, during, and after treatment by means of single antigen bead on Luminex (One Lambda Inc., Canoga Park, CA). Measles and tetanus toxoid IgGs were measured quantitatively by using ELISA (American Research Products Inc., Belmont, MA).

RESULTS

All patients treated with bortezomib/plasmapheresis resulted in a primary DSA reduction of more than 50%. In 10 of 13 patients, complete DSA removal (to below 1000 mean fluorescent intensity) occurred. At 1 year posttreatment, antibody intensity remains significantly depressed in the group as a whole. Despite the significant effect on antibody production, tetanus toxoid and measles IgG levels remained unchanged and above the level of protection at 1 year posttreatment.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that proteasome inhibitors plus plasmapheresis results in prolonged reduction of HLA antibodies while leaving protective immunity intact.

Bortezomib: a new player in pre- and post-transplant desensitization?

Several desensitization strategies have been investigated for the reversal of acute antibody-mediated rejection or for the removal of preformed anti-HLA antibodies, with the aim to promote access to renal transplantation. Today, their success appears limited or incomplete. Bortezomib, a selective inhibitor of the 26S proteasome, which is largely used in the treatment of multiple myeloma, could be a novel promising desensitizing agent. Its mechanism of action and preliminary clinical use in renal transplantation is reviewed here.

[Early postoperative management and immunosuppressive treatment following lung transplantation]

Lung transplantation is now considered a valid option in the management of end-stage respiratory failure. The postoperative period remains a key stage that will influence the average long-term prognosis of the patients. Primary graft failure, postoperative bleeding, infection, acute rejection and complications linked to the surgery, and to vascular or bronchial anastomoses, are risk factors for mortality and morbidity. These must be taken care of quickly via collaboration with the surgical team. The immunosuppressive treatment essential for tolerance induction with regard to the transplanted organ will be introduced during the intraoperative period and continued for life. The combination of a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative agent and corticosteroids remains the conventional procedure. The role of new molecules as mTor inhibitors remains to be determined.