Protective immunity remains intact after antibody removal by means of proteasome inhibition

The Impact of Induction Regimes on Immune Responses in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Current standard frontline therapy for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (NDMM) involves induction therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and maintenance therapy. Major efforts are underway to understand the biological and the clinical impacts of each stage of the treatment protocols on overall survival statistics. The most routinely used drugs in the pre-ASCT "induction" regime have different mechanisms of action and are employed either as monotherapies or in various combinations. Aside from their direct effects on cancer cell mortality, these drugs are also known to have varying effects on immune cell functionality. The question remains as to how induction therapy impacts post-ASCT immune reconstitution and anti-tumor immune responses. This review provides an update on the known immune effects of melphalan, dexamethasone, lenalidomide, and bortezomib commonly used in the induction phase of MM therapy. By analyzing the actions of each individual drug on the immune system, we suggest it might be possible to leverage their effects to rationally devise more effective induction regimes. Given the genetic heterogeneity between myeloma patients, it may also be possible to identify subgroups of patients for whom particular induction drug combinations would be more appropriate.

Pretransplant Desensitization with Costimulation Blockade and Proteasome Inhibitor Reduces DSA and Delays Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Highly Sensitized Nonhuman Primate Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Patients with broad HLA sensitization have poor access to donor organs, high mortality while waiting for kidney transplant, and inferior graft survival. Although desensitization strategies permit transplantation via lowering of donor-specific antibodies, the B cell-response axis from germinal center activation to plasma cell differentiation remains intact.

METHODS

To investigate targeting the germinal center response and plasma cells as a desensitization strategy, we sensitized maximally MHC-mismatched rhesus pairs with two sequential skin transplants. We administered a proteasome inhibitor (carfilzomib) and costimulation blockade agent (belatacept) to six animals weekly for 1 month; four controls received no treatment. We analyzed blood, lymph node, bone marrow cells, and serum before desensitization, after desensitization, and after kidney transplantation.

RESULTS

The group receiving carfilzomib and belatacept exhibited significantly reduced levels of donor-specific antibodies (P=0.05) and bone marrow plasma cells (P=0.02) compared with controls, with a trend toward reduced lymph node T follicular helper cells (P=0.06). Compared with controls, carfilzomib- and belatacept-treated animals had significantly prolonged graft survival (P=0.02), and renal biopsy at 1 month showed significantly reduced antibody-mediated rejection scores (P=0.02). However, four of five animals with long-term graft survival showed gradual rebound of donor-specific antibodies and antibody-mediated rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Desensitization using proteasome inhibition and costimulation blockade reduces bone marrow plasma cells, disorganizes germinal center responses, reduces donor-specific antibody levels, and prolongs allograft survival in highly sensitized nonhuman primates. Most animals experienced antibody-mediated rejection with humoral-response rebound, suggesting desensitization must be maintained after transplantation using ongoing suppression of the B cell response.

The Role of Long-Lived Plasma Cells in Antibody-Mediated Rejection of Kidney Transplantation: An Update

Background

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) following kidney transplant is closely associated with poor prognosis of the recipients. Long-lived plasma cells (LLPCs) produce alloantibodies as long as life time and play a crucial role in ABMR.

Summary

LLPCs generate from germinal centers and reside in survival niches in the bone marrow as well as the inflamed tissues. They are the main and long-term source of the antibodies. LLPCs mediate ABMR via the generation of preformed antibodies in sensitized patients and de novo antibodies after transplantation. They have been acknowledged as the leading causes of ABMR; however, LLPCs are insensitive to traditional immunosuppressive therapy that removes B cells. Strategies targeting LLPCs, such as antithymocyte globulin, proteasome inhibitors as well as monoclonal antibodies, are promising methods to persistently and thoroughly clear the entire PC pool.

Key Message

LLPCs play an important role in ABMR by producing alloantibodies continually, and targeting LLPCs might be a novel and effective approach against ABMR.

Autoantibodies against β1-adrenergic receptor: response to induction therapy with bortezomib-containing regimens for multiple myeloma patients

This study aims to investigate the predictive value of pre-chemotherapy β1R-AABs by evaluating the response of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) patients to their treatment with a bortezomib-containing regimen. Forty-five de novo MM patients and 50 normal controls (NCs) were prospectively enrolled in this study. Serum titers of β1R-AABs were detected by ELISA. These 45 MM patients were divided into two groups (positive and negative groups) according to their β1R-AABs. Follow-up examinations were performed on these patients during chemotherapy induction. The final analysis covered all 45 MM patients, including 19 patients who were positive for MM and 26 patients who were negative for MM. Multivariate analysis revealed that pre-chemotherapy β1R-AABs are possibly independent predictors for less than very good partial response (VGPR) after the bortezomib-containing regimen treatment (odds ratio: 5.967, 95% confidence interval: 1.513-23.531; p = .011). This study demonstrates for the first time that the presence of β1R-AABs is associated with MM. Pre-chemotherapy β1R-AABs are independent predictors for less than VGPR in de novo MM patients after the bortezomib-containing regimen was administrated. Bortezomib might not significantly give rise to cardiac impairment in MM patients.

B Cell Immunity in Solid Organ Transplantation

The contribution of B cells to alloimmune responses is gradually being understood in more detail. We now know that B cells can perpetuate alloimmune responses in multiple ways: (i) differentiation into antibody-producing plasma cells; (ii) sustaining long-term humoral immune memory; (iii) serving as antigen-presenting cells; (iv) organizing the formation of tertiary lymphoid organs; and (v) secreting pro- as well as anti-inflammatory cytokines. The cross-talk between B cells and T cells in the course of immune responses forms the basis of these diverse functions. In the setting of organ transplantation, focus has gradually shifted from T cells to B cells, with an increased notion that B cells are more than mere precursors of antibody-producing plasma cells. In this review, we discuss the various roles of B cells in the generation of alloimmune responses beyond antibody production, as well as possibilities to specifically interfere with B cell activation.

Treatment of antibody‐mediated rejection in renal transplant patients: a clinical practice survey

Introduction

Preferences for the testing and treatment of antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) in renal transplant patients vary among programs and individual practitioners. The description of these preferences and identification of commonalities can contribute to creating a standard of care.

Methods

A survey was distributed through the Transplant Listserv of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) and via email to members of the American Society of Transplantation Community of Pharmacy (AST CoP), collected, and analyzed.

Results

Most clinicians (26/28) test for donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) when evaluating a patient with possible AMR. Treatments for AMR varied widely among responding clinicians and included intravenous immune globulin (IVIG, n = 25), plasmapheresis (n = 24), rituximab (n = 8), bortezomib (n = 4), rabbit antithymocyte globulin (n = 2), and eculizumab (n = 1). Weight‐based dosing of IVIG averaged 1.8 g/kg total dose. Six centers use rituximab as initial therapy, while two use rituximab if other therapy fails. Four centers use bortezomib as initial therapy, while two centers use it for severe/persistent AMR. One center uses eculizumab as initial therapy and one center uses it for severe AMR.

Conclusion

Methods for the detection of AMR are similar, yet treatment of AMR varies widely. Most centers utilize DSA for detection and a combination of IVIG and plasmapheresis for treatment.

Review of bortezomib treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplantation

SIGNIFICANCE

Development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after kidney transplantation is associated with reduced allograft survival. A few strategies have been tested in controlled clinical trials for the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and no therapies are approved by regulatory authorities. Thus development of antihumoral therapies that provide prompt elimination of DSA and improve allograft survival is an important goal.

RECENT ADVANCES

Proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based regimens provide a promising new approach for treating AMR. To date, experiences have been limited to off-label bortezomib use in AMR. Key findings with PI-based therapy are that they provide effective primary and rescue therapy for AMR by prompt reduction in immunodominant DSA and improvements in histologic and renal function. Early and late AMR differ immunologically and in response to PI therapy. Bortezomib-related toxicities in renal transplant recipients are similar to those observed in the multiple myeloma population.

CRITICAL ISSUES

Although preliminary evidence with PI therapy for AMR is encouraging, the evidence is limited. Larger, prospective, randomized controlled trials with long-term follow up are needed. Advancement in endpoints of clinical trial designs and rigorous clinical trials with more standardized adjunct therapies are also required to explore the risks and benefits of AMR treatment modalities.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

In the next few years, new PIs are likely to be introduced and new approaches would be developed for achieving synergy with PIs. The ultimate goal will be to develop a regimen that delivers reliable, rapid, complete, and durable elimination of DSA with an acceptable safety profile.

Plasmapheresis in a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome before living-donor kidney transplantation: a case report

Background

Early graft thrombosis and bleeding complications remain important causes of early graft loss following kidney transplantation in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. Anti-β2-glycoprotein I IgG is a disease-specific antibody in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. Although plasmapheresis is partially effective for antibody removal, the optimal treatment allowing successful transplantation in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome has not been established. This is the first report of a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome who successfully underwent living-donor kidney transplantation following prophylactic plasmapheresis for removal of anti-β2-glycoprotein I IgG.

Case presentation

A 37-year-old Japanese female was scheduled to undergo a living-donor kidney transplant from her mother. At age 25 years, she experienced renal vein thrombosis, was diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus, and was subsequently treated with prednisolone and warfarin. At age 37 years, she was diagnosed with end stage kidney disease, requiring maintenance hemodialysis because of recurrent renal vein thrombosis despite taking anticoagulation therapy. The pretreatment protocol consisted of prophylactic plasmapheresis plus full anticoagulation therapy to counteract the risks of early graft thrombosis. Anticardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein I IgGs were successfully removed by both double filtration plasmapheresis and plasma exchange. The allograft kidney began to function soon after transplantation. No obvious thrombotic complications were observed after transplantation, although anti-β2-glycoprotein I IgG increased to the level observed before plasmapheresis. One year after transplantation, the patient’s kidney function remains stable while receiving anticoagulation therapy as well as a maintenance immunosuppressive regimen.

Conclusion

Prophylactic plasmapheresis plus full anticoagulation therapy may be an effective strategy in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome undergoing living-donor kidney transplantation.

Bortezomib for refractory autoimmunity in pediatrics

Therapy of refractory autoimmunity remains challenging. In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic effect of bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, by targeting plasma cells in 7 patients (median age, 9.9 years). Four doses of bortezomib were administered at a dose of 1.3 mg/m(2) intravenously (n = 6) or subcutaneously (n = 1) every 72 hours. Bortezomib was administered at a median of 120 days from laboratory confirmation of autoantibodies. All patients had failed 2 or more standard therapies. Rituximab was administered on the first day if B cells were present, and all patients received plasmapheresis 2 hours before bortezomib administration. Six patients experienced resolution of cytopenias. Two of 6 patients experienced recurrence of cytopenias after initial response. Adverse effects include nausea (n = 1), thrombocytopenia (n = 2), Clostridium difficile colitis (n = 1)), febrile neutropenia (n = 1), and cellulitis at the subcutaneous injection site (n = 1). Our experience suggests that bortezomib may be beneficial in the treatment of refractory autoimmunity in children.

Protective immunity and use of bortezomib for antibody-mediated rejection in a pediatric kidney transplant recipient

Standard treatments for AMR-rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulin, and/or plasmapheresis-aim to suppress the production and modulate the effect of donor-specific antibodies and remove them, respectively. Proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib are potent therapeutic agents that target plasma cells more effectively than rituximab to reduce measurable donor-specific antibody production. Little is known in adults, and no data exist in children about effects of proteasome inhibition to treat AMR on protective antibody titers. We present a pediatric renal transplant recipient who received bortezomib for relatively early AMR and whose antibody titers to measles and tetanus were tracked. The AMR was treated successfully, and we noted no clinical decrease in the overall level of protective immunity from pretransplant baseline levels at almost one yr after AMR treatment cessation. Larger studies will elucidate more clearly how proteasome inhibition to treat AMR affects protective immunity in pediatric transplant recipients.

Novel immunosuppressive agents in kidney transplantation

Excellent outcomes have been achieved in the field of renal transplantation. A significant reduction in acute rejection has been attained at many renal transplant centers using contemporary immunosuppressive, consisting of an induction agent, a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative agent plus or minus a corticosteroid. Despite improvements with these regimens, chronic allograft injury and adverse events still persist. The perfect immunosuppressive regimen would limit or eliminate calcineurin inhibitors and/or corticosteroid toxicity while providing enhanced allograft outcomes. Potential improvements to the calcineurin inhibitor class include a prolonged release tacrolimus formulation and voclosporin, a cyclosporine analog. Belatacept has shown promise as an agent to replace calcineurin inhibitors. A novel, fully-human anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, ASKP1240, is currently enrolling patients in phase 2 trials with calcineurin minimization and avoidance regimens. Another future goal of transplant immunosuppression is effective and safe treatment of allograft rejection. Novel treatments for antibody mediated rejection include bortezomib and eculizumab. Several investigational agents are no longer being pursed in transplantation including the induction agents, efalizumab and alefacept, and maintenance agents, sotrastaurin and tofacitinib. The purpose of this review is to consolidate the published evidence of the effectiveness and safety of investigational immunosuppressive agents in renal transplant recipients.

Sustained reduction of alloantibody secreting plasma cells and donor specific antibody with proteasome inhibition in mice

The long-lived plasma cells, which develop after alloantigen sensitization, produce donor specific alloantibodies (DSAs) that generate a positive serum cross-match and preclude transplantation. Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, is being investigated in clinical desensitization protocols, however preclinical studies in a transplant model are nonexistent. We hypothesized that sustained treatment with only a proteasome inhibitor would eliminate plasma cells and reduce DSA over time. Cardiac allografts were transplanted into murine recipients. Eight weeks after allograft rejection the proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, was injected intravenously twice weekly for 60 days. Serum alloantibody responses were assayed using flow cross-match. Total and alloreactive plasma cell numbers were enumerated using flow cytometry and ELISPOT. All recipients of cardiac allografts rejected their graft promptly within 16 days and demonstrated alloantibody by flow cross-match. DSA was sustained in the control mice while mice treated with bortezomib had sustained elimination of DSA and a marked reduction in plasma cell population. Also, bortezomib was associated with an increased level of BLyS. Within a murine model, proteasome inhibition can eliminate alloantibody secreting plasma cells, and reduce alloantibody. Cessation of bortezomib is not associated with return of DSA.

Minimal effect of bortezomib in reducing anti-pig antibodies in human leukocyte antigen-sensitized patients: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor used to treat multiple myeloma, has been administered (± plasma exchange ± intravenous immunoglobulin [IVIg]) in attempts to reduce antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLA) in sensitized patients undergoing organ transplantation. To our knowledge, bortezomib has not been investigated for its effect on natural anti-pig antibodies. If bortezomib could reduce the production of anti-pig antibodies, this would likely be beneficial to the outcome of pig organ grafts in primates.

METHODS

Nine patients received bortezomib either to reduce anti-HLA antibody levels before organ allotransplantation or to treat antibody-mediated rejection. Patients at the Mayo Clinic (Group 1; n = 4) received bortezomib alone, whereas at the UPMC (Group 2; n = 5), this was combined with plasmaphereses ± IVIg in some cases. Anti-pig IgM and IgG levels against wild-type (WT) and α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene knockout (GTKO) pig aortic endothelial cells (flow cytometry-relative mean fluorescence intensity) and anti-Gal IgM and IgG (ELISA-OD480 nm ) were measured pre- and post-bortezomib therapy.

RESULTS

Mean anti-pig IgM levels were 11.2 (WT) and 1.9 (GTKO) pre-bortezomib treatment and 9.4 (WT: P = 0.02) and 1.7 (GTKO: P = 0.33) post-bortezomib treatment, respectively. Mean anti-pig IgG levels were 4.3 (WT) and 1.5 (GTKO) pre-bortezomib treatment and 3.6 (WT: P = 0.21) and 1.4 (GTKO: P = 0.20) post-bortezomib treatment, respectively. Mean anti-Gal IgM and IgG levels were 0.7 and 1.1, respectively, pre-treatment, and 0.6 (P = 0.03) and 1.1 (NS), respectively, post-treatment. When the data were analyzed in Groups 1 and 2 separately, there were no significant differences between the pre- and post-bortezomib levels of anti-pig, anti-non-Gal, or anti-Gal IgM or IgG.

CONCLUSIONS

From this limited study, we conclude that bortezomib might reduce anti-Gal IgM levels in primates, but, in this respect alone, is unlikely to have any significant effect on the outcome of GTKO pig organ transplantation.

West Nile virus and dengue virus capsid protein negates the antiviral activity of human Sec3 protein through the proteasome pathway

Flavivirus capsid (C) protein is a key structural component of virus particles. The non-structural role of C protein in the pathogenesis of arthropod-borne flaviviruses is not clearly deciphered. This study showed that West Nile virus (WNV) and dengue virus (DENV) utilized C protein to reduce human Sec3p (hSec3p) levels at post-transcriptional level through activation of chymotrypsin-like proteolytic function of 20S proteasome. Mutagenesis studies confirmed amino acids 14, 109-114 of WNV C protein and 13, 102-107 of DENV C protein played an important role in activating the proteolytic function of 20S proteasome. Amino acid residues at 14 (WNV) and 13 (DENV) of C protein were important for C protein-hSec3p binding and physical interaction between C protein and hSec3p was essential to execute hSec3p degradation. Degradation motif required to degrade hSec3p resided between amino acid residues 109-114 of WNV C protein and 102-107 of DENV C protein. Proteasomes, hSec3p binding motif and degradation motif on C protein must be intact for efficient flavivirus production. Clinical isolates of DENV showed more pronounced effect in manipulating the proteasomes and reducing hSec3p levels. This study portrayed the non-structural function of C protein that helped the flavivirus to nullify the antiviral activity of hSec3p by accelerating its degradation and facilitating efficient binding of elongation factor 1α with flaviviral RNA genome.

Current state of renal transplant immunosuppression: Present and future

For kidney transplant recipients, immunosuppression commonly consists of combination treatment with a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative agent and a corticosteroid. Many medical centers use a sequential immunosuppression regimen where an induction agent, either an anti-thymocyte globulin or interleukin-2 receptor antibody, is given at the time of transplantation to prevent early acute rejection which is then followed by a triple immunosuppressive maintenance regimen. Very low rejection rates have been achieved at many transplant centers using combinations of these agents in a variety of protocols. Yet, a large number of recipients suffer chronic allograft injury and adverse events associated with drug therapy. Regimens designed to limit or eliminate calcineurin inhibitors and/or corticosteroid use are actively being pursued. An ideal immunosuppressive regimen limits toxicity and prolongs the functional life of the graft. This article contains a critical analysis of clinical data on currently available immunosuppressive strategies and an overview of therapeutic moieties in development.

Cardiac antibody-mediated rejection

Many factors limit short- and long-term survival after pediatric heart transplantation. Historically, attention had been directed toward T-cell responses and acute cellular rejection. Presence of pretransplant antibodies against HLA is associated with increased donor wait times and poor post-transplant outcomes. Therapies aimed to mitigate circulating antibodies include plasmapheresis, protein A immunoadsorption columns, intravenous immune globulin, rituximab, and bortezomib. The negative effects of B cells, HLA antibodies, and AMR and potential interventions are the focus of this review article.

Proteasome inhibitors as immunosuppressants: biological rationale and clinical experience

Accumulating evidence supports the potential of proteasome inhibitors as immunosuppressants. Proteasome inhibitors interfere with antigen processing and presentation, as well as with the signaling cascades involved in immune cell function and survival. Both myeloma and healthy plasma cells appear to be highly susceptible to proteasome inhibitors due to impaired proteasomal activity in both cell types. As a consequence, these agents can be used to reduce antibody production and thus prevent antibody-induced tissue damage. Several clinical studies have explored the potential of bortezomib, a peptide boronate proteasome inhibitor, for treating immune disorders, such as antibody-mediated organ rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), with encouraging results. Here, we discuss the biological rationale for the use of proteasome inhibitors as immunosuppressive agents and review the clinical experience with bortezomib in immune-mediated diseases.

Durability of antibody removal following proteasome inhibitor-based therapy

BACKGROUND

Evidence of the short-term effect of bortezomib on donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody (DSA) removal capacity has emerged. However, no published data characterize the durability of DSA response. Here, we report the long-term DSA response results on renal transplant patients treated with bortezomib.

METHODS

In this single-center study, 26 living-donor renal transplant patients with a positive level of de novo DSA were preemptively treated with bortezomib (1.3 mg/m × 4 doses). A total of 15 patients received bortezomib as part of a combination regimen; 11 received bortezomib alone. Weekly serial measurements of HLA antibody were noted before, during, and after treatment using single-antigen beads.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 25.8 months posttreatment, allograft function remained good in each of the patients. Following treatment, 96% of the patients achieved at least a partial response. Eighteen patients (69%) experienced a complete response followed by a period of DSA remission. Ten patients had DSA relapse after remission, at a median of 3.8 months. The remaining eight patients are still in remission at 14 months posttreatment (median). Patients with remission enjoyed better allograft functional stability than those who relapsed (P=0.023). After bortezomib therapy, the addition of a calcineurin inhibitor or mycophenolate mofetil was predictive for maintaining a DSA remission (hazard ratio 0.09, 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

Bortezomib therapy consistently provides reduction in DSA and in many a DSA remission may occur. However, sustaining remission is likely necessary to improve allograft stability.

ABO-incompatible hearts for infant transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The practice of offering ABO-incompatible (ABOi) heart transplantation during infancy was initiated based on the rationale that infants are at the highest risk of dying while waiting for a transplant, yet are at low risk of hyperacute antibody-mediated rejection due to immunologic immaturity. Since the first report of intentional ABOi heart transplantation a decade ago, its success has been corroborated in numerous reports and the practice has been widely adopted. This review summarizes clinical results in reports of ABOi transplantation and the evolution of ABOi listing strategies, as well as evidence of immune tolerance after ABOi transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent reports have documented comparable midterm and long-term clinical outcomes in ABOi and ABO-compatible (ABOc) heart transplant recipients in terms of survival and posttransplant complications. Despite successful outcomes, however, there are obstacles to widespread implementation of ABOi transplantation in the USA and in some European centers. The notable deficiency in development of antibody production to donor A/B antigens following ABOi transplantation described in early reports has been corroborated, with some exceptions. Potential advantages of ABOi transplantation are emerging as well as innovative strategies that may allow ABOi heart transplantation beyond the age of infancy.

SUMMARY

ABOi heart transplantation is one example in which immunologic immaturity has been exploited to the advantage of pediatric transplant recipients. In-depth exploration of transplant-related immunobiology in the young may reveal further opportunities.

The state of therapy for removal of alloantibody producing plasma cells in transplantation

The current evidence clearly points towards donor specific alloantibody as a major cause of allograft loss. In order to mitigate allograft loss due to antibodies, treating the source of antibody production, the plasma cell is essential. Therapies that lack effect on the terminally differentiated (long-lived) plasma cell, such as rituximab, intravenous immune globulin and, plasmapheresis were the therapies used prior to 2007. In studies, their ability to remove antibody was found to be incomplete and/or cost prohibitive. In 2007, a proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, was used for the first time in transplant due to its ability to deplete plasma cells. Through multiple case reports it has demonstrated consistent success in DSA reduction and removal, with only a few reports of failure to date. This review discusses the plasma cell, the alloantibody, and the current data supporting proteasome inhibitor use in transplant.

Recent advances in immunosuppressive therapy for prevention of renal allograft rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Current immunosuppressive therapies are highly successful at regulating acute allograft rejection and inducing long-term transplanted kidney survival; however, currently available medications are associated with generalized immune suppression and drug toxicities, including nephrotoxicity. In recent years, advances in immunosuppression that target specific pathways involved in immune activation have been developed.

RECENT FINDINGS

In particular, promising medications are currently under evaluation that target ischemia-reperfusion injury as well as the cellular and humoral branches of the adaptive immune response. Targets of T-cell-mediated activation include antibodies and fusion proteins interfering with LFA-1/ICAM-1, CD2/LFA-3, CD40/CD154, and CD28/B7.1 and B7.2 interactions. Intracellular targets involved in T- and B-cell activation pathways are being evaluated, including protein kinase C inhibitors, Janus-associated kinase (JAK) inhibitors, and proteasome inhibitors. Several new medications demonstrate promise in inhibiting donor-directed humoral immunity by targeting B-cell-activating factor (BAFF) and complement activation pathways.

SUMMARY

The present review evaluates the recent clinical advances in immunosuppressive therapies for kidney transplantation. Publications regarding advances in immunosuppressive therapies over the past year were evaluated in the context of the specific immune pathways involved in allograft rejection.

Proteasome inhibitor treatment of antibody-mediated allograft rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bortezomib is a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor that was originally Food and Drug Administration approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma. In the past few years, off-label use in solid organ transplant recipients has demonstrated its ability to provide plasma cell-targeted therapy in humans. The purpose of this review is to provide an update of recent basic science and clinical results with bortezomib in treating antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) that occurs in solid organ transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Proteasome inhibitor therapy for AMR in kidney transplant recipients is effective both as primary and as rescue therapy. Optimal responses with proteasome inhibitor therapy are obtained when AMR is diagnosed promptly and early in the posttransplant period. However, proteasome inhibitor therapy for late AMR (i.e., occurring 6 months or later posttransplant) provides less predictable results, likely due to the existence of a substantial bone marrow niche-resident long-lived plasma cell population. Proteasome inhibitor therapy has also recently been shown to provide effective therapy for AMR in heart, and also, transplant recipients.

SUMMARY

Proteasome inhibitor therapy with bortezomib provides effective treatment for AMR in solid organ transplant recipients. As the first plasma cell-targeted therapy, proteasome inhibitor therapy provides the additional advantage of opening new possibilities for biologically defined plasma cell-targeted therapies.

Reduction of alloantibodies via proteasome inhibition in cardiac transplantation

BACKGROUND

The presence of alloantibodies in patients awaiting heart transplantation is associated with increased waiting time to transplant, increased risk of rejection after transplant, an increased risk of cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and decreased survival. So far, treatments to reduce circulating antibodies to allow transplantation have been limited. We report the first clinical experience using a plasma-cell-depleting strategy with bortezomib to reduce anti-HLA antibodies in the heart transplant population.

METHODS

Six patients awaiting cardiac transplantation demonstrated persistently elevated anti-HLA antibodies, despite receiving a course of treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and rituximab. These patients then underwent supplemental therapy with bortezomib in conjunction with plasmapheresis. One additional patient awaiting cardiac transplantation with elevated anti-HLA antibodies required bortezomib treatment for amyloidosis. Antibody strength was monitored after completion of treatment by solid-phase (single-antigen-bead) assay.

RESULTS

The mean calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) was reduced from 62% to 35% following a course of bortezomib (p = 0.01). Six of 7 patients demonstrated a significant decline in antibody levels. One patient remained refractory to desensitization therapy and died from sepsis while awaiting heart transplantation. Four patients successfully underwent cardiac transplantation without evidence of rejection or graft dysfunction. One patient developed early post-transplant graft dysfunction and died at 1 month from sepsis. Infection was the most common adverse effect associated with desensitization.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, use of plasmapheresis and bortezomib appeared to decrease cPRA, even in patients refractory to desensitization with IVIg/rituximab, thus increasing the chances that an acceptable donor heart will be available for the sensitized patient awaiting heart transplantation. However, desensitization is associated with an increased risk of infection. Further studies are warranted to determine whether the benefits of desensitization using this strategy outweigh the risks.

Targeting B cells and antibody in transplantation

There has been increasing interest in the role played by B cells, plasma cells and their associated antibody in the immune response to an allograft, driven by the need to undertake antibody-incompatible transplantation and evidence suggesting that B cells play a role in acute cellular rejection and in acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection. A number of immunosuppressive agents have emerged which target B cells, plasma cells and/or antibody, for example, the B cell-depleting CD20 antibody rituximab. This review describes recent developments in the use of such agents, our understanding of the role of B cells in alloimmunity and the application of this knowledge toward novel therapies in transplantation. It also considers the evidence to date suggesting that B cells may act as regulators of an alloimmune response. Thus, future attempts to target B cells will need to address the problem of how to inhibit effector B cells, while enhancing those with regulatory capacity.