Modified multivisceral transplantation with spleen-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis "Gardner's Syndrome"

Intestinal transplantation in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

In patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP), large desmoid tumors can develop all over the body. However, the most frequent presentation is as large intra-abdominal masses, usually located in the mesentery of the small bowel. From there, they tend to grow and invade both the abdominal wall and/or the retroperitoneal structures. This can cause life-threatening complications such as recurrent abdominal sepsis with fistulation and damage to vital organs. In selected patients, the only option may be radical resection and replacement by intestinal transplantation (ITx). We aimed to review all the current literature on ITx for FAP-related desmoids and provide an update from the largest single-center experience (2007-2024). All patients undergoing ITx for FAP-related desmoid were included. Between 2007 and 2024, 166 ITx was performed in 158 patients at Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. Of these, 20 (12%) were for desmoid associated with FAP (10 modified multivisceral transplants, 8 isolated ITx and 2 liver-containing grafts). The five-year all-cause patient survival was 92%, median follow-up was 4.3 years. As the patients presented with very advanced disease, many technical challenges were faced such as: extensive ureteric involvement, abdominal wall fistulation, management of previously formed ileo-anal pouches and extra-abdominal recurrences. Graft selection was another evolving issue, as foregut resection- versus sparing techniques require careful preoperative risk stratification due to increased long-term cancer risk in FAP patients. For certain patients with advanced FAP/desmoid disease, ITx can allow for a radical resection with excellent survival and functional outcomes. However, there is a high degree of initial morbidity associated with the operation and patients should be appropriately counselled. Graft selection and degree of native organ resection requires a careful balanced discussion.

First report of full colon transplantation as part of a visceral allograft

BACKGROUND

The inclusion of the colon as part of intestinal and multivisceral allografts has increased in the last decade.

METHODS

We describe for the first time in the literature a full colon transplantation as a part of a visceral allograft. The new approach involves modifications of the procurement technique with preservation of all three visceral aortic branches and incorporation of the descending and sigmoid colon as a part of the allograft.

RESULT

Seventeen months after transplantation, the patient is off any parenteral nutritional support, on full oral nutrition without the need for a single antidiarrheal agent.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of this novel technique could open new opportunities for hindgut reconstruction for patients requiring visceral transplantation, with potential increase in allograft absorptive capacity and improvement in quality of life.

History of clinical intestinal transplantation

The intestines have been considered the "forbidden organ" for years, and intestinal failure became the last organ failure recognized as such in the medical field. The impossibility of providing adequate nutritional support, turned these patients into recipients of just palliative comfort. In the 1960's, parenteral nutrition appeared as the most reasonable replacement therapy, but the initial success obtained with clinical kidney, heart, liver, lung and pancreas transplantation served as background to explore intestinal transplantation. The first clinical report of an isolated intestinal transplant was done by Richard Lillihei in 1967; in 1983, Thomas Starzl, performed the first multi visceral transplant, and in 1990, David Grant performed the first combined liver-intestinal transplant in an adult recipient in Canada. Since then, advances in immunosuppressive therapies and surgical innovations have allowed not only a continuous increase in indications, but also a worldwide application of all procedures, bringing clinical intestinal transplantation to reality. In this historical account, the most important contributions have been summarized, thus describing the steady progress, expansion and novelties developed over the last 56 years, since the first attempt. Clinical intestinal transplantation remains a complex and evolving field; ongoing research and technological advancements will continue shaping its future.

Treatment of Complex Desmoid Tumors in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Syndrome by Intestinal Transplantation

Background

Desmoid tumors are fibroblastic lesions which often have an unpredictable and variable clinical course. In the context of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), these frequently occur intra-abdominally, especially in the small-bowel mesentery resulting in sepsis, fistulation, and invasion of the abdominal wall and retroperitoneum. In selected cases where other modalities have failed, the most radical option is to perform a total enterectomy and intestinal transplantation (ITx). In this study, we present our center's experience of ITx for desmoid in patients with FAP.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of our prospectively collected database between 2007 and 2022. All patients undergoing ITx for FAP-related desmoid were included.

Results

Between October 2007 and September 2023, 144 ITx were performed on 130 patients at our center. Of these, 15 patients (9%) were for desmoid associated with FAP (7 modified multivisceral transplants, 6 isolated ITx, and 2 liver-containing grafts). The median follow-up was 57 mo (8-119); 5-y patient survival was 82%, all with functioning grafts without local desmoid recurrence. These patients presented us with several complex surgical issues, such as loss of abdominal domain, retroperitoneal/abdominal wall involvement, ileoanal pouch-related issues, and the need for foregut resection because of adenomatous disease.

Conclusions

ITx is a viable treatment in selected patients with FAP and extensive desmoid disease. The decision to refer for ITx can be challenging, particularly the timing and sequence of treatment (simultaneous versus sequential exenteration). Delays can result in additional disease burden, such as secondary liver disease or invasion of adjacent structures.

Native Spleen Preservation During Visceral Transplantation Inhibits Graft-Versus-Host-Disease Development: Clinical and Experimental Study

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess whether native spleen preservation during visceral transplantation (VT) affects graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) incidence.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

GVHD is one of the most severe and frequently lethal hematological complications after VT procedures. Because there is no specific treatment for GVHD, it is imperative to develop a strategy to reduce donor lymphocyte engraftment and proliferation.

METHODS

Our study included both clinical and experimental data. A total of 108 patients were divided into 3 groups: a native spleen preservation group, a native spleen removal with no donor spleen group, and a donor spleen included (allogeneic spleen) group. We also used an allogeneic VT rat model, in which recipients were divided into 2 groups: a native spleen preservation (+SP) group and a native spleen removal (-S) group. Skin rash appearance, histopathological changes, chimerism, and spleen effects on circulating allogeneic T-cells were assessed.

RESULTS

The patients with native spleen preservation showed a lower rate of GVHD ( P <.001) and better survival ( P <.05) than those in the other groups. Skin and histological signs of GVHD were lower in the rats in the +SP group ( P <.05). The donor T-cell frequency in the bloodstream and skin was also significantly reduced when the native spleen was preserved ( P <.01 and P <.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical and experimental data indicate that recipient spleen preservation protects against GVHD after VT, and donor cell clearance from the bloodstream by spleen macrophages could be the underlying mechanism. Therefore, spleen preservation should be considered in VT procedures, whenever possible.

Disease recurrence after gut transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite three decades of clinical experience, this article is the first to comprehensively address disease recurrence after gut transplantation. Pertinent scientific literature is reviewed and management strategies are discussed with new insights into advances in gut pathobiology and human genetics.

RECENT FINDINGS

With growing experience and new perspectives in the field of gut transplantation, the topic of disease recurrence continues to evolve. The clinicopathologic spectrum and diagnostic criteria are better defined in milieu of the nature of the primary disease. In addition to neoplastic disorders, disease recurrence is suspected in patients with pretransplant Crohn's disease, gut dysmotility, hypercoagulability and metabolic syndrome. There has also been an increased awareness of the potential de-novo development of various disorders in the transplanted organs. For conventionally unresectable gastrointestinal and abdominal malignancies, ex-vivo excision and autotransplantation are advocated, particularly for the nonallotransplant candidates.

SUMMARY

Similar to other solid organ and cell transplantations, disease recurrence has been suspected following gut transplantation. Despite current lack of conclusive diagnostic criteria, recurrence of certain mucosal and neuromuscular disorders has been recently described in a large single-centre series with an overall incidence of 7%. Disease recurrence was also observed in recipients with pretransplant hypercoagulability and morbid obesity with respective incidences of 4 and 24%. As expected, tumour recurrence is largely determined by type, extent and biologic behaviour of the primary neoplasm. With the exception of high-grade aggressive malignancy, disease recurrence is still of academic interest with no significant impact on overall short and long-term outcome.

Long-term survival in visceral transplant recipients in the new era: A single-center experience

There is a paucity of data on long-term outcomes following visceral transplantation in the contemporary era. This is a single-center retrospective analysis of all visceral allograft recipients who underwent transplant between November 2003 and December 2013 with at least 3-year follow-up data. Clinical data from a prospectively maintained database were used to assess outcomes including patient and graft survival. Of 174 recipients, 90 were adults and 84 were pediatric patients. Types of visceral transplants were isolated intestinal transplant (56.3%), combined liver-intestinal transplant (25.3%), multivisceral transplant (16.1%), and modified multivisceral transplant (2.3%). Three-, 5-, and 10-year overall patient survival was 69.5%, 66%, and 63%, respectively, while 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall graft survival was 67%, 62%, and 61%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, significant predictors of survival included pediatric recipient (P = .001), donor/recipient weight ratio <0.9 (P = .008), no episodes of severe acute rejection (P = .021), cold ischemia time <8 hours (P = .014), and shorter hospital stay (P = .0001). In conclusion, visceral transplantation remains a good option for treatment of end-stage intestinal failure with parenteral nutritional complications. Proper graft selection, shorter cold ischemia time, and improvement of immunosuppression regimens could significantly improve the long-term survival.

Composite and Multivisceral Transplantation: Nomenclature, Surgical Techniques, Current Practice, and Long-term Outcome

The successful development of multivisceral and composite visceral transplantation is among the milestones in the recent history of human organ transplantation. All types of gastrointestinal transplantation have evolved to be the standard of care for patients with gut failure and complex abdominal pathologic conditions. The outcome has markedly improved over the last 3 decades owing to technical innovation, novel immunosuppression, and better postoperative care. Recent data documented significant improvement in the long-term therapeutic indices of all types of visceral transplantation close to that achieved with thoracic and solid abdominal organs.

Composite and Multivisceral Transplantation: Nomenclature, Surgical Techniques, Current Practice, and Long-term Outcome

The successful development of multivisceral and composite visceral transplantation is among the milestones in the recent history of human organ transplantation. All types of gastrointestinal transplantation have evolved to be the standard of care for patients with gut failure and complex abdominal pathologic conditions. The outcome has markedly improved over the last 3 decades owing to technical innovation, novel immunosuppression, and better postoperative care. Recent data documented significant improvement in the long-term therapeutic indices of all types of visceral transplantation close to that achieved with thoracic and solid abdominal organs.

Multivisceral transplant is a viable treatment option for patients with non-resectable intra-abdominal fibromatosis

BACKGROUND

Intra-abdominal fibromatosis often involves the mesentery root which is non-resectable by conventional surgery. Multivisceral transplant (MVT), as a potential cure to non-resectable fibromatosis, has rarely been reported and the prognosis is unknown.

METHODS

Six patients who underwent MVT for intra-abdominal fibromatosis were reviewed. Clinicopathological features, immunohistochemistry for β-catenin, p53, and Ki67, and outcomes were evaluated. Appropriate data for comparative analysis were obtained from a cohort of 24 patients who underwent conventional resection for intra-abdominal fibromatosis.

RESULTS

Among six MVT patients, four had familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Two patients had an initial intestinal transplantation, three had multiple prior surgeries, and two had adjuvant therapy. One patient died of hemorrhagic stroke shortly after MVT, and five patients (83%) survived with a median follow-up of 64 months. The 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 67% for all five patients. Two patients had recurrences after MVT and one of them had FAP. In comparison, six of 24 patients who underwent conventional surgery had FAP; six (25%) had recurrences and three had FAP. For FAP patients; the mean recurrence time was 13 months for MVT versus 6 months for conventional surgery. Ki67 proliferative index, β-catenin, and p53 expression did not significantly correlate to recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Multivisceral transplant (MVT) is a viable option for patients who have non-resectable intra-abdominal fibromatosis with promising surviving rates, although recurrence still occurs. Surgical margin, Ki67 proliferative index, β-catenin, and p53 expression are not predicative for recurrence of fibromatosis.

Intestinal transplantation: a review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this article is to review the existing literature on the current indications, surgical techniques, immunosuppressive therapy and outcomes following intestinal transplantation (ITx).

RECENT FINDINGS

Over recent years, ITx has become a more common operation with approximately 2500 procedures carried out worldwide by 2014. It is reserved for patients with intestinal failure and who have developed complications of home parenteral nutrition or who have a high risk of dying from their underlying disease. Recent advances such as the improvement in survival rates, not only for isolated small bowel transplants but also following inclusion of a liver graft in combined liver-small bowel transplant, and the utility of citrulline as a noninvasive biomarker to appreciate acute rejection herald an exciting shift in the field of ITx.

SUMMARY

With advancements in immunosuppressive drugs, induction regimens, standardization of surgical techniques and improved postoperative care, survival is increasing. In due course, it will most likely become as good as remaining on home parenteral nutrition and as such could become a viable first-line option.

Current status of intestinal and multivisceral transplantation

Clinical-nutritional autonomy is the ultimate goal of patients with intestinal failure (IF). Traditionally, patients with IF have been relegated to lifelong parenteral nutrition (PN) once surgical and medical rehabilitation attempts at intestinal adaptation have failed. Over the past two decades, however, outcome improvements in intestinal transplantation have added another dimension to the therapeutic armamentarium in the field of gut rehabilitation. This has become possible through relentless efforts in the standardization of surgical techniques, advancements in immunosuppressive therapies and induction protocols and improvement in postoperative patient care. Four types of intestinal transplants include isolated small bowel transplant, liver-small bowel transplant, multivisceral transplant and modified multivisceral transplant. Current guidelines restrict intestinal transplantation to patients who have had significant complications from PN including liver failure and repeated infections. From an experimental stage to the currently established therapeutic modality for patients with advanced IF, outcome improvements have also been possible due to the introduction of tacrolimus in the early 1990s. Studies have shown that intestinal transplant is cost-effective within 1-3 years of graft survival compared with PN. Improved survival and quality of life as well as resumption of an oral diet should enable intestinal transplantation to be an important option for patients with IF in addition to continued rehabilitation. Future research should focus on detecting biomarkers of early rejection, enhanced immunosuppression protocols, improved postoperative care and early referral to transplant centers.

Choice of Allograft in Patients Requiring Intestinal Transplantation: A Critical Review

Intestinal transplantation (ITx) is indicated in patients with irreversible intestinal failure (IF) and life-threatening complications related to total parenteral nutrition (TPN). ITx can be classified into three main types. Isolated intestinal transplantation (IITx), that is, transplantation of the jejunoileum, is indicated in patients with preserved liver function. Combined liver-intestine transplantation (L-ITx), that is, transplantation of the liver and the jejunoileum, is indicated in patients with liver failure related to TPN. Thus, patients with cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis should receive a combined allograft, while patients with lower grades of liver fibrosis can usually safely undergo ITx. Reflecting their degree of sickness, the waitlist mortality rate and the early posttransplant outcomes of patients receiving L-ITx are worse than IITx. However, L-ITx is associated with better long-term graft and patient survival. Multivisceral transplantation (MVTx), that is, transplantation of the organs dependent on the celiac axis and superior mesenteric artery, can be classified into full MVTx if it includes the liver and modified MVTx if it does not. The most common indications for MVTx are extensive portomesenteric thrombosis and diffuse gastrointestinal pathology such as motility disorders and polyposis syndrome. Every patient with IF should undergo a multidisciplinary evaluation by an experienced ITx team.

The concept of gut rehabilitation and the future of visceral transplantation

In the 1990s, the introduction of visceral transplantation fuelled interest in other innovative therapeutic modalities for gut rehabilitation. Ethanol lock and omega-3 lipid formulations were introduced to reduce the risks associated with total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Autologous surgical reconstruction and bowel lengthening have been increasingly utilized for patients with complex abdominal pathology and short-bowel syndrome. Glucagon-like peptide 2 analogue, along with growth hormone, are available to enhance gut adaptation and achieve nutritional autonomy. Intestinal transplantation continues to be limited to a rescue therapy for patients with TPN failure. Nonetheless, survival outcomes have substantially improved with advances in surgical techniques, immunosuppressive strategies and postoperative management. Furthermore, both nutritional autonomy and quality of life can be restored for more than two decades in most survivors, with social support and inclusion of the liver being favourable predictors of long-term outcome. One of the current challenges is the discovery of biomarkers to diagnose early rejection and further improve liver-free allograft survival. Currently, chronic rejection with persistence of preformed and development of de novo donor-specific antibodies is a major barrier to long-term graft function; this issue might be overcome with innovative immunological and tolerogenic strategies. This Review discusses advances in the field of gut rehabilitation, including intestinal transplantation, and highlights future challenges. With the growing interest in individualized medicine and the value of health care, a novel management algorithm is proposed to optimize patient care through an integrated multidisciplinary team approach.

Intestine and multivisceral transplantation: current status and future directions

Intestinal failure and associated parenteral nutrition-induced liver failure cause significant morbidity, mortality, and health care burden. Intestine transplantation is now considered to be the standard of care in patients with intestinal failure who fail intestinal rehabilitation. Intestinal failure-associated liver disease is an important sequela of intestinal failure, caused by parenteral lipids, requiring simultaneous liver-intestine transplant. Lipid minimization and, in recent years, the emergence of fish oil-based lipid emulsions have been shown to reverse parenteral nutrition-associated hyperbilirubinemia, but not fibrosis. Significant progress in surgical techniques and immunosuppression has led to improved outcomes after intestine transplantation. Intestine in varying combination with liver, stomach, and pancreas, also referred to as multivisceral transplantation, is performed for patients with intestinal failure along with liver disease, surgical abdominal catastrophes, neuroendocrine and slow-growing tumors, and complete portomesenteric thrombosis with cirrhosis of the liver. Although acute and chronic rejection are major problems, long-term survivors have excellent quality of life and remain free of parenteral nutrition.

Current status of the organ replacement approach for malignancies and an overture for organ bioengineering and regenerative medicine

Significant achievements in the organ replacement approach for malignancies over the last 2 decades opened new horizons, and the age of "Transplant Oncology" has dawned. The indications of liver transplantation for malignancies have been carefully expanded by a strict patient selection to assure comparable outcomes with non-malignant diseases. Currently, the Milan criteria, gold standard for hepatocellular carcinoma, are being challenged by high-volume centers worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and liver transplantation for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma has been successful in specialized institutions. For other primary and metastatic liver tumors, clinical evidence to establish standardized criteria is lacking. Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation is an option for low-grade neoplasms deemed unresectable by conventional surgery. However, the procedure itself is in the adolescent stage. Solid organ transplantation for malignancies inevitably suffers from "triple distress," i.e., oncological, immunological, and technical. Organ bioengineering and regenerative medicine should serve as the "triple threat" therapy and revolutionize "Transplant Oncology."

Surgical treatment of intra-abdominal desmoid tumors resulting in short bowel syndrome

Advanced intra-abdominal desmoids tumors present with severe symptoms, complications or rapid growth, which lead to adverse outcomes. Our aim was to evaluate the treatment and outcome of patients with advanced intra-abdominal desmoids tumors, and develop guidelines for surgical management of these patients. We reviewed the clinical courses of 21 adult patients with advanced stage intra-abdominal desmoid tumors who presented to an intestinal rehabilitation and transplantation program. Patients with massive intestinal resection presented in two groups. The first group had a short small intestinal remnant after resection (<60 cm). These patients were poor rehabilitation candidates and eventually met criteria for transplant. The second had longer intestinal remnants and were more successfully rehabilitated and have not had complications that would lead to transplantation. Advanced intra-abdominal desmoid tumors have outcomes after resection that merit aggressive resection and planned intestinal rehabilitation and intestinal transplantation as indicated.