1
|
Connor AA, Saharia A, Mobley CM, Hobeika MJ, Victor DW, Kodali S, Brombosz EW, Graviss EA, Nguyen DT, Moore LW, Gaber AO, Ghobrial RM. Modern Outcomes After Liver Retransplantation: A Single-center Experience. Transplantation 2023; 107:1513-1523. [PMID: 36706077 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The need for liver retransplantation (reLT) has increased proportionally with greater numbers of liver transplants (LTs) performed, use of marginal donors, degree of recipient preoperative liver dysfunction, and longer survival after LT. However, outcomes following reLT have been historically regarded as poor. METHODS To evaluate reLT in modern recipients, we retrospectively examined our single-center experience. Analysis included 1268 patients undergoing single LT and 68 patients undergoing reLT from January 2008 to December 2021. RESULTS Pre-LT mechanical ventilation, body mass index at LT, donor-recipient ABO incompatibility, early acute rejection, and length of hospitalization were associated with increased risk of needing reLT following index transplant. Overall and graft survival outcomes in the reLT cohort were equivalent to those after single LT. Mortality after reLT was associated with Kidney Donor Profile Index, national organ sharing at reLT, and LT donor death by anoxia and blood urea nitrogen levels. Survival after reLT was independent of the interval between initial LT and reLT, intraoperative packed red blood cell use, cold ischemia time, and preoperative mechanical ventilation, all previously linked to worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that reLT is currently a safer option for patients with liver graft failure, with comparable outcomes to primary LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashton A Connor
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Ashish Saharia
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Constance M Mobley
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Mark J Hobeika
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - David W Victor
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Sudha Kodali
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | - Edward A Graviss
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Duc T Nguyen
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Linda W Moore
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - A Osama Gaber
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - R Mark Ghobrial
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pardo F, Pons JA, Castells L, Colmenero J, Gómez MÁ, Lladó L, Pérez B, Prieto M, Briceño J. VI consensus document by the Spanish Liver Transplantation Society. Cir Esp 2019; 96:326-341. [PMID: 29776591 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2017.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2017] [Revised: 11/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The goal of the Spanish Liver Transplantation Society (La Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático) is to promote and create consensus documents about current topics in liver transplantation with a multidisciplinary approach. To this end, on October 20, 2016, the 6th Consensus Document Meeting was held, with the participation of experts from the 24 authorized Spanish liver transplantation programs. This Edition discusses the following subjects, whose summary is offered below: 1) limits of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation; 2) limits of elective liver re-transplantation; and 3) liver transplantation after resection and hepatocellular carcinoma with factors for a poor prognosis. The consensus conclusions for each of these topics is provided below.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Pardo
- Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático, Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, España
| | - José Antonio Pons
- Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático, Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, España
| | - Lluís Castells
- Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, España
| | - Jordi Colmenero
- Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, España
| | - Miguel Ángel Gómez
- Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, España
| | - Laura Lladó
- Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital de Bellvitge, Barcelona, España
| | - Baltasar Pérez
- Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, España
| | - Martín Prieto
- Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - Javier Briceño
- Comité Científico de la Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático, Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, España.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pardo F, Pons JA, Castells L, Colmenero J, Gómez MÁ, Lladó L, Pérez B, Prieto M, Briceño J. VI consensus document by the Spanish Liver Transplantation Society. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2018; 41:406-421. [PMID: 29866511 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2018.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2017] [Revised: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The goal of the Spanish Liver Transplantation Society (La Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático) is to promote and create consensus documents about current topics in liver transplantation with a multidisciplinary approach. To this end, on October 20, 2016, the 6th Consensus Document Meeting was held, with the participation of experts from the 24 authorized Spanish liver transplantation programs. This Edition discusses the following subjects, whose summary is offered below: 1) limits of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation; 2) limits of elective liver re-transplantation; and 3) liver transplantation after resection and hepatocellular carcinoma with factors for a poor prognosis. The consensus conclusions for each of these topics is provided below.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Pardo
- Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático, Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, España
| | - José Antonio Pons
- Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático, Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, España
| | - Lluís Castells
- Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, España
| | - Jordi Colmenero
- Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, España
| | - Miguel Ángel Gómez
- Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, España
| | - Laura Lladó
- Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital de Bellvitge, Barcelona, España
| | - Baltasar Pérez
- Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, España
| | - Martín Prieto
- Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - Javier Briceño
- Comité Científico de la Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático, Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, España.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Hepatic retransplantation has been surgically challenging since the beginning of liver transplant. Outcomes have improved over time, but patient survival with retransplant continues to be significantly worse than that of primary transplant. Many studies have focused on factors to predict outcomes. Models have been developed to help predict risk, but the decision for retransplant must be a multidisciplinary transplant team decision. The question of "when is too much?" can be guided by recipient and donor factors but is an ethical decision that must be made by the liver transplant team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Berumen
- Department of Abdominal Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
| | - Alan Hemming
- Department of Abdominal Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Song ATW, Sobesky R, Vinaixa C, Dumortier J, Radenne S, Durand F, Calmus Y, Rousseau G, Latournerie M, Feray C, Delvart V, Roche B, Haim-Boukobza S, Roque-Afonso AM, Castaing D, Abdala E, D’Albuquerque LAC, Duclos-Vallée JC, Berenguer M, Samuel D. Predictive factors for survival and score application in liver retransplantation for hepatitis C recurrence. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:4547-4558. [PMID: 27182164 PMCID: PMC4858636 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i18.4547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2015] [Accepted: 01/18/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To identify risk factors associated with survival in patients retransplanted for hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence and to apply a survival score to this population.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified 108 patients retransplanted for HCV recurrence in eight European liver transplantation centers (seven in France, one in Spain). Data collection comprised clinical and laboratory variables, including virological and antiviral treatment data. We then analyzed the factors associated with survival in this population. A recently published score that predicts survival in retransplantation in patients with hepatitis C was applied. Because there are currently no uniform recommendations regarding selection of the best candidates for retransplantation in this setting, we also described the clinical characteristics of 164 patients not retransplanted, with F3, F4, or fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) post-first graft presenting with hepatic decompensation.
RESULTS: Overall retransplantation patient survival rates were 55%, 47%, and 43% at 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Patients who were retransplanted for advanced cirrhosis had survival rates of 59%, 52%, and 49% at 3, 5, and 10 years, while those retransplanted for FCH had survival rates of 34%, 29%, and 11%, respectively. Under multivariate analysis, and adjusting for the center effect and the occurrence of FCH, factors associated with better survival after retransplantation were: negative HCV viremia before retransplantation, antiviral therapy after retransplantation, non-genotype 1, a Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score < 25 when replaced on the waiting list, and a retransplantation donor age < 60 years. Although the numbers were small, in the context of the new antivirals era, we showed that outcomes in patients who underwent retransplantation with undetectable HCV viremia did not depend on donor age and MELD score. The Andrés score was applied to 102 patients for whom all score variables were available, producing a mean score of 43.4 (SD = 6.6). Survival rates after the date of the first decompensation post-first liver transplantation (LT1) in the liver retransplantation (reLT) group (94 patients decompensated) at 3, 5, and 10 years were 62%, 59%, and 51%, respectively, among 78 retransplanted individuals with advanced cirrhosis, and 42%, 32%, and 16% among 16 retransplanted individuals with FCH. In the non-reLT group with hepatic decompensation, survival rates were 27%, 18%, and 9% at 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively (P < 0.0001). Compared with non-retransplanted patients, retransplanted patients were younger at LT1 (mean age 48 ± 8 years compared to 53 ± 9 years in the no reLT group, P < 0.0001), less likely to have human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection (4% vs 14% among no reLT patients, P = 0.005), more likely to have received corticosteroid bolus therapy after LT1 (25% in reLT vs 12% in the no reLT group, P = 0.01), and more likely to have presented with sustained virological response (SVR) after the first transplantation (20% in the reLT group vs 7% in the no reLT group, P = 0.028).
CONCLUSION: Antiviral therapy before and after retransplantation had a substantial impact on survival in the context of retransplantation for HCV recurrence, and with the new direct-acting antivirals now available, outcomes should be even better in the future.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Chronic HCV infection is the leading indication for liver transplantation. However, as a result of HCV recurrence, patient and graft survival after liver transplantation are inferior compared with other indications for transplantation. HCV recurrence after liver transplantation is associated with considerable mortality and morbidity. The development of HCV-related fibrosis is accelerated after liver transplantation, which is influenced by a combination of factors related to the virus, donor, recipient, surgery and immunosuppression. Successful antiviral therapy is the only treatment that can attenuate fibrosis. The advent of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) has changed the therapeutic landscape for the treatment of patients with HCV. DAAs have improved tolerability, and can potentially be used without PEG-IFN for a shorter time than previous therapies, which should result in better outcomes. In this Review, we describe the important risk factors that influence HCV recurrence after liver transplantation, highlighting the mechanisms of fibrosis and the integral role of hepatic stellate cells. Indirect and direct assessment of fibrosis, in addition to new antiviral therapies, are also discussed.
Collapse
|
7
|
Dumortier J, Boillot O, Scoazec JY. Natural history, treatment and prevention of hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation: Past, present and future. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:11069-11079. [PMID: 25170196 PMCID: PMC4145750 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2013] [Revised: 03/07/2014] [Accepted: 06/23/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma is the main indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide. Post-transplant HCV re-infection is almost universal and results in accelerated progression from acute hepatitis to chronic hepatitis, and liver cirrhosis. Comprehension and treatment of recurrent HCV infection after LT have been major issues for all transplant hepatologists and transplant surgeons for the last decades. The aim of this paper is to review the evolution of our knowledge on the natural history of HCV recurrence after LT, including risk factors for disease progression, and antiviral therapy. We will focus our attention on possible ways (present and future) to improve the final long-term results of LT for HCV-related liver disease.
Collapse
|
8
|
deLemos AS, Schmeltzer PA, Russo MW. Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplant. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:10668-81. [PMID: 25152571 PMCID: PMC4138448 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i31.10668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2013] [Revised: 01/25/2014] [Accepted: 04/02/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
End stage liver disease from hepatitis C is the most common indication for liver transplantation in many parts of the world accounting for up to 40% of liver transplants. Antiviral therapy either before or after liver transplantation is challenging due to side effects and lower efficacy in patients with cirrhosis and liver transplant recipients, as well as from drug interactions with immunosuppressants. Factors that may affect recurrent hepatitis C include donor age, immunosuppression, IL28B genotype, cytomegalovirus infection, and metabolic syndrome. Older donor age has persistently been shown to have the greatest impact on recurrent hepatitis C. After liver transplantation, distinguishing recurrent hepatitis C from acute cellular rejection may be difficult, although the development of molecular markers may help in making the correct diagnosis. The advent of interferon free regimens with direct acting antiviral agents that include NS3/4A protease inhibitors, NS5B polymerase inhibitors and NS5A inhibitors holds great promise in improving outcomes for liver transplant candidates and recipients.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Hepatic retransplant accounts for 5% to 15% of liver transplants in most series and is associated with significantly increased hospital costs and inferior patient survival when compared with primary liver transplant. Early retransplants are usually due to primary graft nonfunction or vascular thrombosis, whereas later retransplants are most commonly necessitated by chronic rejection or recurrent primary liver disease. Hepatic retransplant remains the sole option for survival in many patients facing allograft failure after liver transplant. With improved techniques to match retransplant candidates with appropriate donor grafts, it is hoped that the outcomes of retransplant will continue to improve in future.
Collapse
|
10
|
Dai WC, Chan SC, Chok KSH, Cheung TT, Sharr WW, Chan ACY, Fung JYY, Wong TCL, Lo CM. Retransplantation using living-donor right-liver grafts. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2014; 21:579-584. [PMID: 24550160 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study reviews the outcomes of retransplantation using living-donor right-liver grafts. METHODS A retrospective study of liver retransplants performed between 1996 and 2013 was conducted. The retransplants were divided into the DD group (with deceased donors) and the LD group (with living donors). Survival outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS The DD group contained 23 patients and 27 retransplants using whole-liver grafts and the LD group contained 11 patients and 11 retransplants using right-liver grafts. Vascular and biliary complications were the main indications for retransplantation in both groups. The LD group had significantly younger donors, lighter grafts, shorter cold ischemia and longer operations. The two groups were comparable in age, preoperative liver function, warm ischemia, blood loss, transfusion, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, hospital mortality, complication and graft loss. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year patient survival rates were 78.3%, 73.7% and 63.8%, respectively, in the DD group. The LD group had the corresponding rates all at 90.9% (P = 0.246). The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year graft survival rates were 74.1%, 65.8% and 61.5%, respectively, in the DD group. The LD group had the corresponding rates all at 90.9% (P = 0.132). CONCLUSION Excellent long-term survival after retransplantation using living-donor right-liver grafts can be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wing Chiu Dai
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong, China.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bunchorntavakul C, Reddy KR. Management of Hepatitis C Before and After Liver Transplantation in the Era of Rapidly Evolving Therapeutic Advances. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2014; 2:124-33. [PMID: 26357623 PMCID: PMC4521260 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2014.00002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2014] [Revised: 02/13/2014] [Accepted: 02/20/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Management of hepatitis C (HCV) in liver transplantation (LT) population presents unique challenges. Suboptimal graft survival in HCV+ LT recipients is attributable to universal HCV recurrence following LT. Although eradication of HCV prior to LT is ideal for the prevention of HCV recurrence it is often limited by adverse events, particularly in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Antiviral therapy in LT candidates needs careful monitoring, and prophylaxis with HCV antibodies is ineffective. Early antiviral therapy after LT has been investigated, but no clear benefit has been demonstrated. Protocol liver biopsy is generally recommended in HCV+ LT recipients, and antiviral therapy can be considered in those with severe/progressive HCV recurrence. Sustained virological response (SVR) can be achieved in approximately 30% of LT recipients with pegylated interferon/ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) with survival benefit, but adverse effects are common. Favorable patient characteristics for response to therapy include non-1 genotype, previously untreated, low baseline HCV-RNA, and donor IL28B genotype CC. Direct acting antiviral (DAA)-based triple therapy is associated with higher rates of SVR, but with similar or slightly higher rates of side effects, and immunosuppressive regimens need to be closely monitored and adjusted during the treatment period. Notably, the safety and efficacy of HCV treatment are very likely to improve with newer generation DAA. The benefit of immunosuppressive strategy on the natural history HCV recurrence has not been well elucidated. Based upon available evidence, cyclosporine A (CSA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and sirolimus appear to have a neutral or small beneficial impact on HCV recurrence. Donor interleukin 28 B (IL28B) polymorphisms appear to impact the course and treatment outcomes in recurrent HCV. Retransplantation should be considered for patients with reasonable survival probability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chalermrat Bunchorntavakul
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - K. Rajender Reddy
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zignego AL, Giannini C, Gragnani L, Piluso A, Fognani E. Hepatitis C virus infection in the immunocompromised host: a complex scenario with variable clinical impact. J Transl Med 2012; 10:158. [PMID: 22863056 PMCID: PMC3441205 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2012] [Accepted: 07/11/2012] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The relationship between Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection and immunosuppression is complex and multifaceted. Although HCV-related hepatocytolysis is classically interpreted as secondary to the attack by cytotoxic T lymphocytes against infected cells, the liver disease is usually exacerbated and more rapidly evolutive in immunosuppressed patients. This generally occurs during the immunosuppression state, and not at the reconstitution of the host response after immunosuppressive therapy discontinuation. The field of immunosuppression and HCV infection is complicated both by the different outcome observed in different situations and/or by contrasting data obtained in the same conditions, with several still unanswered questions, such as the opportunity to modify treatment schedules in the setting of post-transplant follow-up. The complexity of this field is further complicated by the intrinsic tendency of HCV infection in itself to lead to disorders of the immune system. This review will briefly outline the current knowledge about the pathogenesis of both hepatic and extrahepatic HCV-related disorders and the principal available data concerning HCV infection in a condition of impairment of the immune system. Attention will be especially focused on some conditions - liver or kidney transplantation, the use of biologic drugs and cancer chemotherapy - for which more abundant and interesting data exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Linda Zignego
- Center for Systemic Manifestations of Hepatitis Viruses (MASVE), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Recurrent HCV disease is the most common cause of graft loss and patient mortality in HCV-infected liver transplant (LT) recipients. Risk factors for more severe recurrence that are potentially modifiable are older donor age, prolonged cold ischaemia time, prior treated acute rejection, CMV hepatitis, IL28B donor genotype, and post-LT insulin resistance. The most effective means of preventing HCV recurrence is eradicating HCV prior to LT. Select wait-list candidates with compensated or mildly decompensated disease can be considered for antiviral treatment with peginterferon, ribavirin (and protease inhibitor if genotype 1). For the majority of LT patients, HCV treatment must be delayed until post-transplant. Treatment is generally undertaken if histologic severity reaches grade 3 or 4 necroinflammation or stage ≥2 fibrosis, or if cholestatic hepatitis. Achievement of sustained viral response (SVR) post-LT is associated with stabilization of fibrosis and improved graft survival. SVR is attained in ~30% of patients treated with peginterferon and ribavirin. Poor tolerability of therapy is a limitation. Combination therapy with telaprevir or boceprevir added to peginterferon and ribavirin is anticipated to increase efficacy but with higher rates of adverse effects and challenges in managing drug-drug interactions between the protease inhibitors and calcineurin inhibitors/sirolimus.
Collapse
|