Concurrent acute cellular rejection is an independent risk factor for renal allograft failure in patients with C4d-positive antibody-mediated rejection

Natural Antibodies Are Associated With Rejection and Long-term Renal Allograft Loss in a Multicenter International Cohort

BACKGROUND

Potentially harmful nonhuman leukocyte antigen antibodies have been identified in renal transplantation, including natural immunoglobulin G antibodies (Nabs) reactive to varied antigenic structures, including apoptotic cells.

METHODS

In this retrospective, multicenter study, we assessed Nabs by reactivity to apoptotic cells in sera collected from 980 kidney transplant recipients across 4 centers to determine their association with graft outcomes.

RESULTS

Elevated pretransplant Nabs were associated with graft loss (hazard ratio [HR] 2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-6.39; P   =  0.0232), the composite endpoint of graft loss or severe graft dysfunction (HR 2.40; 95% CI, 1.13-5.10; P  = 0.0232), and T cell-mediated rejection (odds ratio [OR] 1.77; 95% CI, 1.07-3.02; P  = 0.0310). High pretransplant Nabs together with donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) were associated with increased risk of composite outcomes (HR 6.31; 95% CI, 1.81-22.0; P  = 0.0039). In patients with high pretransplant Nabs, the subsequent development of posttransplant Nabs was associated with both T cell-mediated rejection (OR 3.64; 95% CI, 1.61-8.36; P  = 0.0021) and mixed rejection (OR 3.10; 95% CI, 1.02-9.75; P  = 0.0473). Finally, elevated pre- and posttransplant Nabs combined with DSAs were associated with increased risk of composite outcomes (HR 3.97; 95% CI, 1.51-10.43; P  = 0.0052) and T cell-mediated rejection (OR 7.28; 95% CI, 2.16-25.96; P  = 0.0016).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of pre- and posttransplant Nabs, together with DSAs, was associated with increased risk of poor graft outcomes and rejection after renal transplantation.

Acute Rejection and Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: Obstructive and Restrictive Allograft Dysfunction

Lung transplantation is an established treatment of well-selected patients with end-stage respiratory diseases. However, lung transplant recipients have the highest rates of acute and chronic rejection among transplanted solid organs. Owing to ongoing alloimmune recognition and associated immune-driven airway/vascular remodeling, precipitated by multifactorial, endogenous or exogenous, post-transplant injuries to the bronchovascular axis of the secondary pulmonary lobule, most lung transplant recipients will suffer from a pathophysiological decline of their allograft, either functionally and/or structurally. This review discusses current knowledge, barriers, and gaps in acute cellular rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction-the greatest impediment to long-term post-transplant survival.

A Banff-based histologic chronicity index is associated with graft loss in patients with a kidney transplant and antibody-mediated rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is the major cause of graft loss in kidney transplant recipients. The Banff classification defines two classes of AMR, active and chronic active but over time this classification has become increasingly complex. To simplify the approach to AMR, we developed activity and chronicity indices based on kidney transplant biopsy findings and examined their association with graft survival in 147 patients with active or chronic active AMR, all of whom had donor-specific antibodies and were treated for AMR. The activity index was determined as the sum of Banff glomerulitis (g), peritubular capillaritis (ptc), arteritis (v) and C4d scores, with a maximum score of 12. The chronicity index was the sum of interstitial fibrosis (ci), tubular atrophy (ct), chronic vasculopathy (cv), and chronic glomerulopathy (cg) scores, the latter doubled, with a maximum score of 15. While the activity index was generally not associated with graft loss, the chronicity index was significantly associated with graft loss with an optimal threshold value of 4 or greater for predicting graft loss. The association of the chronicity index of 4 or greater with graft loss was independent of other parameters associated with graft loss, including the estimated glomerular filtration rate at the time of biopsy, chronic active (versus active) AMR, AMR with de novo (versus persistent/rebound) donor-specific antibodies, Banff (g+ptc) scores, concurrent T cell-mediated rejection and donor-specific antibody reduction post-biopsy. The association of the chronicity index of 4 or greater with graft loss was confirmed in an independent cohort of 61 patients from Necker Hospital, Paris. Thus, our findings suggest that the chronicity index may be valuable as a simplified approach to decision-making in patients with AMR.

Banff Human Organ Transplant Transcripts Correlate with Renal Allograft Pathology and Outcome: Importance of Capillaritis and Subpathologic Rejection

BACKGROUND

To seek insights into the pathogenesis of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR), we performed mRNA analysis and correlated transcripts with pathologic component scores and graft outcomes.

METHODS

We utilized the NanoString nCounter platform and the Banff Human Organ Transplant gene panel to quantify transcripts on 326 archived renal allograft biopsy samples. This system allowed correlation of transcripts with Banff pathology scores from the same tissue block and correlation with long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

The only pathology score that correlated with AMR pathways in CAMR was peritubular capillaritis (ptc). C4d, cg, g, v, i, t, or ci scores did not correlate. DSA-negative CAMR had lower AMR pathway scores than DSA-positive CAMR. Transcript analysis in non-CAMR biopsies yielded evidence of increased risk of later CAMR. Among 108 patients without histologic CAMR, 23 developed overt biopsy-documented CAMR within 5 years and as a group had higher AMR pathway scores (P=3.4 × 10-5). Random forest analysis correlated 3-year graft loss with elevated damage, innate immunity, and macrophage pathway scores in CAMR and TCMR. Graft failure in CAMR was associated with TCMR transcripts but not with AMR transcripts, and graft failure in TCMR was associated with AMR transcripts but not with TCMR transcripts.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritubular capillary inflammation and DSA are the primary drivers of AMR transcript elevation. Transcripts revealed subpathological evidence of AMR, which often preceded histologic CAMR and subpathological evidence of TCMR that predicted graft loss in CAMR.

Differential Treatment Effects for Renal Transplant Recipients With DSA-Positive or DSA-Negative Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Background

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is the main cause of renal allograft loss. The most common treatment strategy is based on plasmapheresis plus the subsequent administration of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Unfortunately, no approved long-term therapy is available for ABMR. The current study was designed to analyze the effect of various ABMR treatment approaches on allograft survival and to compare treatment effects in the presence or absence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs).

Methods

This single-center study retrospectively analyzed 102 renal allograft recipients who had biopsy-proven ABMR after transplant. DSA was detectable in 61 of the 102 patients. Initial standard treatment of ABMR consisted of plasmapheresis (PS) or immunoadsorption (IA), followed by a single course of IVIG. In case of nonresponse or recurrence, additional immunosuppressive medications, such as rituximab, bortezomib, thymoglobulin, or eculizumab, were administered. In a second step, persistent ABMR was treated with increased maintenance immunosuppression, long-term therapy with IVIG (more than 1 year), or both.

Results

Overall graft survival among transplant patients with ABMR was <50% after 3 years of follow-up. Compared to the use of PS/IA and IVIG alone, the use of additional immunosuppressive medications had no beneficial effect on allograft survival (p = 0.83). Remarkably, allografts survival rates were comparable between patients treated with the combination of PS/IA and IVIG and those treated with a single administration of IVIG (p = 0.18). Renal transplant patients with ABMR but without DSAs benefited more from increased maintenance immunosuppression than did DSA-positive patients with ABMR (p = 0.01). Recipients with DSA-positive ABMR exhibited significantly better allograft survival after long-term application of IVIG for more than 1 year than did recipients with DSA-negative ABMR (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

The results of our single-center cohort study involving kidney transplant recipients with ABMR suggest that long-term application of IVIG is more favorable for DSA-positive recipients, whereas intensification of maintenance immunosuppression is more effective for recipients with DSA-negative ABMR.

Pure T-cell mediated rejection following kidney transplant according to response to treatment

The focus of studies on kidney transplantation (KT) has largely shifted from T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). However, there are still cases of pure acute TCMR in histological reports, even after a long time following transplant. We thus evaluated the impact of pure TCMR on graft survival (GS) according to treatment response. We also performed molecular diagnosis using a molecular microscope diagnostic system on a separate group of 23 patients. A total of 63 patients were divided into non-responders (N = 22) and responders (N = 44). Non-response to rejection treatment was significantly associated with the following factors: glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at biopsy, ΔGFR, TCMR within one year, t score, and IF/TA score. We also found that non-responder vs. responder (OR = 3.31; P = 0.036) and lower GFR at biopsy (OR = 0.56; P = 0.026) were independent risk factors of graft failure. The responders had a significantly superior overall GS rate compared with the non-responders (P = 0.004). Molecular assessment showed a good correlation with histologic diagnosis in ABMR, but not in TCMR. Solitary TCMR was a significant risk factor of graft failure in patients who did not respond to rejection treatment.

Recommended Treatment for Antibody-mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: The 2019 Expert Consensus From the Transplantion Society Working Group

With the development of modern solid-phase assays to detect anti-HLA antibodies and a more precise histological classification, the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has become more common and is a major cause of kidney graft loss. Currently, there are no approved therapies and treatment guidelines are based on low-level evidence. The number of prospective randomized trials for the treatment of AMR is small, and the lack of an accepted common standard for care has been an impediment to the development of new therapies. To help alleviate this, The Transplantation Society convened a meeting of international experts to develop a consensus as to what is appropriate treatment for active and chronic active AMR. The aim was to reach a consensus for standard of care treatment against which new therapies could be evaluated. At the meeting, the underlying biology of AMR, the criteria for diagnosis, the clinical phenotypes, and outcomes were discussed. The evidence for different treatments was reviewed, and a consensus for what is acceptable standard of care for the treatment of active and chronic active AMR was presented. While it was agreed that the aims of treatment are to preserve renal function, reduce histological injury, and reduce the titer of donor-specific antibody, there was no conclusive evidence to support any specific therapy. As a result, the treatment recommendations are largely based on expert opinion. It is acknowledged that properly conducted and powered clinical trials of biologically plausible agents are urgently needed to improve patient outcomes.

High levels of dd-cfDNA identify patients with TCMR 1A and borderline allograft rejection at elevated risk of graft injury

The clinical importance of subclinical, early T cell-mediated rejection (Banff TCMR 1A and borderline lesions) remains unclear, due, in part to the fact that histologic lesions used to characterize early TCMR can be nonspecific. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is an important molecular marker of active graft injury. Over a study period from June 2017 to May 2019, we assessed clinical outcomes in 79 patients diagnosed with TCMR 1A/borderline rejection across 11 US centers with a simultaneous measurement of dd-cfDNA. Forty-two patients had elevated dd-cfDNA (≥0.5%) and 37 patients had low levels (<0.5%). Elevated levels of dd-cfDNA predicted adverse clinical outcomes: among patients with elevated cfDNA, estimated glomerular filtration rate declined by 8.5% (interquartile rate [IQR] -16.22% to -1.39%) (-3.50 mL/min/1.73 m2 IQR -8.00 to -1.00) vs 0% (-4.92%, 4.76%) in low dd-cfDNA patients (P = .004), de novo donor-specific antibody formation was seen in 40% (17/42) vs 2.7% (P < .0001), and future or persistent rejection occurred in 9 of 42 patients (21.4%) vs 0% (P = .003). The use of dd-cfDNA may complement the Banff classification and to risk stratify patients with borderline/TCMR 1A identified on biopsy.

Kidney allograft failure in the steroid-free immunosuppression era: A matched case-control study

We studied the causes and predictors of death-censored kidney allograft failure among 1670 kidney recipients transplanted at our center in the corticosteroid-free maintenance immunosuppression era. As of January 1, 2012, we identified 137 recipients with allograft failure; 130 of them (cases) were matched 1-1 for recipient age, calendar year of transplant, and donor type with 130 recipients with functioning grafts (controls). Median time to allograft failure was 29 months (interquartile range: 18-51). Physician-validated and biopsy-confirmed categories of allograft failure were as follows: acute rejection (21%), glomerular disease (19%), transplant glomerulopathy (13%), interstitial fibrosis tubular atrophy (10%), and polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (7%). Graft failures were attributed to medical conditions in 21% and remained unresolved in 9%. Donor race, donor age, human leukocyte antigen mismatches, serum creatinine, urinary protein, acute cellular rejection, acute antibody-mediated rejection, BK viremia, and CMV viremia were associated with allograft failure. Independent predictors of allograft failure were acute cellular rejection (odds ratio: 18.31, 95% confidence interval: 5.28-63.45) and urine protein ≥1 g/d within the first year post-transplantation (5.85, 2.37-14.45). Serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL within the first year post-transplantation reduced the odds (0.29, 0.13-0.64) of allograft failure. Our study has identified modifiable risk factors to reduce the burden of allograft failure.

Dynamic Prognostic Score to Predict Kidney Allograft Survival in Patients with Antibody-Mediated Rejection

No tool is available for the early assessment of response to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) therapies in kidney allograft recipients. This study was designed to define a dynamic composite prognostic ABMR score to predict kidney allograft survival, integrating the disease characteristics at diagnosis and the response to treatment. Among 1978 kidney recipients who underwent transplant between 2008 and 2014, we included 278 patients diagnosed with active ABMR and receiving standard treatment, including plasma exchange, intravenous Ig, and rituximab. Patients were prospectively assessed at diagnosis and after treatment for clinical data, histologic characteristics (allograft biopsy specimen), and donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). The dynamic ABMR prediction model included GFR (P<0.001) and presence of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (P=0.003) at diagnosis and changes in GFR (P<0.001), peritubular capillaritis Banff score (P=0.002), and DSA mean fluorescence intensity (P<0.001) after treatment. Overall, this model showed good calibration and discrimination (C-statistic=0.84). The ABMR prognostic score derived from the prediction model identified three risk strata with 6-year kidney allograft survival rates of 6.0% (high-risk group, n=40), 44.9% (intermediate-risk group, n=36), and 84.4% (low-risk group, n=202), and it provided greater net clinical benefit to patients than did considering them all to have the same level of risk of allograft loss. The performance of the ABMR prognostic score was validated in an independent cohort of 202 kidney recipients with ABMR (C-statistic=0.79). The ABMR prognostic score could be used to inform therapeutic decisions in clinical practice and for the design of clinical trials.

Persistent C4d and antibody-mediated rejection in pediatric renal transplant patients

Pediatric renal transplant recipient survival continues to improve, but ABMR remains a significant contributor to graft loss. ABMR prognostic factors to guide treatment are lacking. C4d staining on biopsies, diagnostic of ABMR, is associated with graft failure. Persistent C4d+ on follow-up biopsies has unknown significance, but could be associated with worse outcomes. We evaluated a retrospective cohort of 17 pediatric renal transplant patients diagnosed with ABMR. Primary outcome at 12 months was a composite of ≥50% reduction in eGFR, transplant glomerulopathy, or graft failure. Secondary outcome was the UPCR at 12 months. We used logistic and linear regression modeling to determine whether persistent C4d+ on follow-up biopsy was associated with the outcomes. Forty-one percent reached the primary outcome at 12 months. Persistent C4d+ on follow-up biopsy occurred in 41% and was not significantly associated with the primary outcome, but was significantly associated with the secondary outcome (estimate 0.22, 95% CI 0.19-0.25, P < .001), after controlling for confounding factors. Persistent C4d+ on follow-up biopsies was associated with a higher UPCR at 12 months. Patients who remain C4d+ on follow-up biopsy may benefit from more aggressive or prolonged ABMR treatment.

Treatment of Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation - 10 Years' Experience With Apheresis at a Single Center

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a major cause of kidney graft failure. We aimed to analyze treatment and outcome of AMR in a national cohort of 75 biopsy-proven acute (43 patients, 57%) or chronic active (32 patients, 43%) AMR episodes between 2000 and 2015. The mean patients' age was 46 ± 16 years, the majority was treated with plasma exchange, 4% received immunoadsorption and 7% received both. The majority received pulse methylprednisolone and low-dose CMV hyperimmune globulin, 20% received bortezomib and 13% rituximab. Concomitant infection was treated in 40% of patients. The immediate treatment outcome was successful in 91%, the 1- and 3-year graft survival rates were 71% and 57%, while 3-year patient survival was 97%. Chronic active AMR was associated with worse graft survival than acute AMR (log rank P = 0.06). To conclude, intensive treatment with apheresis and additional immunosuppression was effective in reversing AMR, but long-term graft survival remains markedly decreased, especially in chronic active AMR.

C1q binding is not an independent risk factor for kidney allograft loss after an acute antibody-mediated rejection episode: a retrospective cohort study

After kidney transplantation, C4d is an incomplete marker of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and C1q-binding donor-specific antibodies (DSA) have been associated with allograft survival. However, the impact on allograft survival of C1q+ DSA after clinical AMR has not been studied yet. We analysed retrospectively in clinical AMR C4d staining and C1q-binding impact on allograft survival. We compared clinical, histological and serological features of C4d- and C4d+ AMR, C1q+ and C1q- DSA AMR and analysed C4d and C1q-binding impact on allograft survival. Among 500 for-cause kidney allograft biopsies, 48 fulfilled AMR criteria. C4d+ AMR [N = 18 (37.5%)] have significantly higher number class I DSA (P = 0.02), higher microvascular score (P = 0.02) and more transplant glomerulopathy (P = 0.04). C1q+ AMR [N = 20 (44%)] presented with significantly more class I and class II DSA (P = 0.005 and 0.04) and C4d+ staining (P = 0.01). Graft losses were significantly higher in the C4d+ group (P = 0.04) but similar in C1q groups. C4d+ but not C1q+ binding was an independent risk factor for graft loss [HR = 2.65; (1.11-6.34); P = 0.028]. In our cohort of clinical AMR, C4d+ staining but not C1q+ binding is an independent risk factor for graft loss. Allograft loss and patient survival were similar in C1q+ and C1q- AMR.

Rejection of the Renal Allograft in the Absence of Demonstrable Antibody and Complement

BACKGROUND

Recent literature has stressed the prominent role of antibodies in graft loss. This study was designed to assess a growing perception that T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is no longer clinically relevant.

METHODS

Five hundred forty-five renal allograft recipients over a 3-year period were screened for biopsies with: (a) TCMR including borderline change (BL), (b) negative complement protein C4 degradation fragment, and (c) absence of donor-specific antibody at time of transplant, within 30 days of the biopsy, and up to 4 measurements at later time points.

RESULTS

These stringent requirements identified 28 "pure" cases of late TCMR/BL. Low-grade glomerulitis, peritubular capillaritis, or chronic transplant glomerulopathy were found in 9/28 (32%) biopsies. Serum creatinine showed complete short-term remission in 7/10 (70%) BL and 9/18 (50%) TCMR patients 1 month postbiopsy. Yet, both treated and untreated patients demonstrated further decline in graft function as assessed by serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Late TCMR seen in 7.9% of biopsies can contribute to significant deterioration of graft function in patients in whom the dominant contribution of antibody-mediated injury has been reasonably excluded. Our data also reinforce existing literature showing that microvascular lesions do not have absolute specificity for a diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection.

Repeated cycles of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis for treatment of late antibody-mediated rejection of renal transplants

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) plays a central role in the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of renal allografts, but the treatment outcomes for late AMR (>6 months after transplantation) are poor.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study to assess the response patterns of IVIG-based (2 g/kg) desensitization for late AMR. Patients who received desensitization after the pathological diagnosis of late AMR positive for complement component C4d were grouped as the Desensitized Group and compared to a historical Control Group with complement component C4d positivity in retrospective stainings.

RESULTS

The 10-year graft survival of the Desensitized Group (73.9%, n = 35) was significantly better than that of the historical Control Group (35.0%, n = 40) without desensitization. In the Desensitized Group, a subgroup of patients (D2 Subgroup, n = 11), who responded to desensitization initially but deteriorated later, was identified to benefit from repeated cycles of desensitization at 31.1 ± 20.9 months. Patients receiving only one cycle of desensitization were further grouped into D1-good (n = 10) and D1-poor (n = 14) based on their long-term renal function. The D2 Subgroup patients did not exhibit significant improvements in renal function compared to the D1-poor patients, until 30 months after IVIG-based desensitization, suggesting desensitization therapy has a working window of approximately 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Repeated cycles of IVIG-based desensitization help stabilize long-term renal function in patients with persistent AMR.

Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Based on the 2013 Banff Criteria: Single-Center Experience in Uruguay

BACKGROUND

Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) diagnosis criteria have changed in recent consensus of Banff, with current evidence of C4d-negative AMR. Our objective was to evaluate incidence of AMR in renal transplantation according to Banff 2013 criteria and to examine the histological features and outcome.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved all kidney transplants with histological diagnosis of acute rejection (AR) at our center between 2000 and 2014. All the biopsies with AR were re-assessed by a nephro-pathologist and classified by use of the Banff 2013 criteria.

RESULTS

Of 205 kidney transplants, biopsy-proven AR was diagnosed in 25 cases (12%). Re-assessing them according to Banff 2013 criteria, AMR was diagnosed in 17 (8.3%) and represented 68% of the confirmed rejections. AMR diagnosis was performed on day 23 ± 26, with median of 11 days. From the 17 cases, 7 had concomitant T-cell-mediated rejection. All cases presented endothelial edema and acute tubular necrosis. Glomerulitis was found in 12 cases and capillaritis in 14. In 3, associated thrombotic micro-angiopathy (TMA) was found. Intimal and transmural arteritis was evidenced in 5 and 1 patient. In 2, transplant glomerulopathy was present. Seven of the 10 biopsies with C4d staining in the peri-tubular capillaries were positive. Twelve cases received plasmapheresis, 6 received gamma-globulin, and 6 received rituximab. After administration of anti-AMR therapy, 16 cases recovered renal function, reaching a serum creatinine level of 1.5 ± 0.6 mg %. Graft survival at 1 year was lower in the AMR group versus patients without AMR (81.9% vs 98.9%, log-rank test, P < .001). Risk factors for AMR were re-transplant (30% vs 7%, P = .02), HLA-DR mismatch (1.06 ± 0.65 vs 0.7 ± 0.6, P = .03), panel-reactive antibody (28% ± 33 vs 6.2 ± 13, P = .00), and delayed graft function (82% vs 30%, P = .00).

CONCLUSIONS

Adapting the new Banff 2013 criteria increased the sensitivity of the diagnosis of ARM. Regarding our data, despite an adequate response to the therapy, it resulted in a worse graft survival by the first year of renal transplant.

Four-Year Analyses of Renal Graft Biopsies: A Single-Center Pathology Experience

OBJECTIVES

Kidney transplant is the best treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Long-term graft survival depends on the protection of renal allograft function. Renal allograft biopsy is the most important method for examining an allograft function. Biopsy provides critical information, enabling diagnosis and grading of pathologic changes, prediction of response to therapy, and long-term graft prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent renal transplant from living and deceased donors at Baskent University Adana Teaching and Research Hospital between 2010 and 2014 and who had an indication for biopsy. Clinical characteristics and laboratory results of patients were recorded. Patient biopsy samples were examined according to the Banff 2009 classification.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2014, there were 175 renal transplants performed at our hospital, with 134 recipients (76.6%) having living-donor and 41 recipients (23.4%) having deceased-donor transplants. Fifty-one patients (29.1%) were children, and 124 patients (70.9%) were adults. We found that there were 123 biopsies made from 75 transplant patients over a 4-year period. When examined according to Banff 2009 criteria, the biopsy samples revealed acute T-cell-mediated rejection alone in 14.1% of the samples, acute antibody-mediated rejection in 4%, and a combination of the 2 rejections in 5.7%. Specific infections were detected in 12 patients. The graft nephrectomy rate was 5.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study investigated biopsy results, their relation with patient clinical status and 4-year survival rates, and our pathology experience and found that rejection and infection rates were similar to the literature. Our future studies with a longer follow-up and a larger sample size will likely provide more accurate information about graft survival and biopsy results.

Using Molecular Phenotyping to Guide Improvements in the Histologic Diagnosis of T Cell-Mediated Rejection

Recognition that some lesions typical of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) also occur in antibody-mediated rejection requires revision of the histologic TCMR definition. To guide this process, we assessed the relative importance of various lesions and the performance of new histology diagnostic algorithms, using molecular TCMR scores as histology-independent estimates of true TCMR. In 703 indication biopsies, random forest analysis and logistic regression indicated that interstitial infiltrate (i-lesions) and tubulitis (t-lesions) were the key histologic predictors of molecular TCMR, with arteritis (v-lesions) having less importance. Histology predicted molecular TCMR more accurately when diagnoses were assigned by strictly applying the Banff rules to the lesion scores and redefining isolated v-lesion TCMR. This improved prediction from area under the curve (AUC) 0.70 with existing rules to AUC 0.80. Further improvements were achieved by introducing more categories to reflect inflammation (AUC 0.84), by summing the lesion scores (AUC 0.85) and by logistic regression (AUC 0.90). We concluded that histologic assessment of TCMR can be improved by placing more emphasis on i- and t-lesions and incorporating new algorithms for diagnosis. Nevertheless, some discrepancies between histologic and molecular diagnoses persist, partially due to the inherent nonspecificity of i- and t-lesions, and molecular methods will be required to help resolve these cases.

Acute Cellular Rejection and C4d Positivity in Heart Transplantation : A Manifestation of Asymptomatic Antibody-Mediated Rejection?

OBJECTIVES

The role of routine C4d staining in endomyocardial biopsy specimens is uncertain. The implications of a diagnosis of acute cellular rejection (ACR) with a positive C4d with or without any evidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are unclear. This study sought to evaluate a distinct phenotype of ACR+/C4d+ in AMR- patients.

METHODS

Data on C4d, ACR, and AMR were collected. Donor-specific antibody (DSA), panel-reactive antibody (PRA), flow crossmatch, and data on ACR and AMR episodes were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were followed. Group I with C4d+ biopsy specimens was compared with group II with C4d- biopsy specimens. ACR greater than 1R was higher in group I compared with group II (50% vs 7.4%; P = .01). Clinical suspicion of AMR, positive retrospective crossmatches, and detection of de novo DSA were also higher in group I.

CONCLUSIONS

Our result indicate that C4d and ACR positivity in posttransplant patients may be a harbinger of a subclinical form of asymptomatic AMR.

Acute Rejection Clinically Defined Phenotypes Correlate With Long-term Renal Allograft Survival

BACKGROUND

Classification of acute rejection (AR) based on etiology and timing may provide a means for enhancing therapeutic results and allograft survival. This study evaluated graft and patient survival after the first AR episodes among kidney transplant recipients with an early or late antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), acute cellular rejection (ACR) or mixed AR (MAR).

METHODS

A prospective institutional review board-approved database was queried to identify biopsy-proven first AR episodes occurring from January 2005 to October 2012. The ACR was defined by Banff criteria; borderline AR was excluded. The AMR was defined as 3 of 4 criteria: renal dysfunction, donor specific antibody, C4d positivity on biopsy, and histological changes. The MAR met criteria for both ACR and AMR. Early AR occurred within six months post-transplant. AR episodes were then assigned to 1 of the 6 categories--early AMR, early ACR, early MAR, late AMR, late ACR, and late MAR.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-two kidney transplant recipients identified with a first AR episode. Mean follow-up was 773 days (± 715 days). No difference was observed in patient survival. Death-censored graft survival was 84%. Death-censored graft loss was higher with late versus early AMR (P = 0.01) and late versus early ACR (P = 0.03), but not late versus early MAR (P = 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

The AR type demonstrated a hierarchy for graft survival with ACR better than MAR better than AMR, which persisted for both early and late AR. Improvement in long-term results of AR may require development of specific treatment for individual AR types.

T-cell-mediated rejection of the kidney in the era of donor-specific antibodies: diagnostic challenges and clinical significance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Burgeoning literature on antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) has led to a perception that T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is no longer a significant problem. This premise needs to be carefully appraised.

RECENT FINDINGS

A review of the literature indicates that TCMR remains an independent-risk factor for graft loss. Importantly, it can occur as a sensitizing event that triggers ABMR, and adversely affects its outcome. Moreover, T cells are regularly present in lesions used to diagnose ABMR, and these lesions can also develop in the absence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Conversely, patients with DSA are at risk for mixed ABMR-TCMR, which is quite common in many studies, and may require a combined anti-T-cell and anti-B-cell strategy for the best outcome.

SUMMARY

T-cell-based clinical monitoring and therapy is still relevant for prophylaxis of both cellular and humoral rejection, treatment of steroid refractory TCMR, which occurs in up to 20% of patients, and optimization of clinical outcome in mixed TCMR-ABMR, which is more frequently encountered than generally appreciated, and still associated with unacceptably high rates of graft loss.

Differential modulation of donor-specific antibodies after B-cell depleting therapies to cure chronic antibody mediated rejection

BACKGROUND

Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are considered as reliable biomarkers for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) diagnosis. However, it is unclear whether DSA monitoring is necessary and could predict graft outcome after antirejection treatment.

METHODS

We analyzed 28 non-sensitized kidney transplant patients with ABMR associated with de novo anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DSA. Donor-specific antibody levels were measured by single antigen bead assays 12 months after antirejection therapy onset. Patients were placed in three groups according to their antirejection treatment: group I (n = 10), plasma exchange-Rituximab; group II (n = 8), Bortezomib; and group III (n = 10), optimization of maintenance immunosuppression. Half of the patients in group I demonstrated concomitant acute cellular rejection (ACR+).

RESULTS

De novo DSA were mainly anti-DQ (60%). Anti-class I and anti-DR DSA disappeared after treatment in group I and remained negative during follow-up, whereas anti-DQ DSA persisted without any modulation. In contrast, class I-II HLA-DSA mean fluorescence intensity remained unchanged in groups II and III.Graft loss was observed in 80% and 20% of patients from group I (ACR+) and group III, respectively. One year after the ABMR treatment, a 16-mL/min decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate was observed in patients from group I (ACR-) and group III. Group II showed better outcomes with a mean estimated glomerular filtration rate decline of 6.4 mL/min.

CONCLUSION

Modulation of DSA at and after treatment of ABMR did not correlate with graft outcome over a 12-month period.

Positive C4d in kidney transplantation biopsy: clinical impact

BACKGROUND

Deposition of C4d in peritubular capillaries of renal graft is normally associated with the presence of antibody-mediated rejection. The clinical impact of its presence in patients with renal transplant in Colombia is uncertain, as well as the association in acute rejection and the response to the management and survival of the graft. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of having positive C4d in biopsies of patients with episodes of acute cellular rejection.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 226 biopsies of kidney transplantation, all of them with acute rejection and histopathological findings classified according to Banff criteria 2009 and performed between January 2005 and December 2012 for graft dysfunction. C4d staining was performed by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

C4d staining was positive in 25 of 226 biopsies. Rejection time in patients with positive C4d was 15 months in average vs 8 months with negative C4d.

CONCLUSIONS

With the use of a multivariate analysis, we found that the unique risk for C4d in our population was the positive panel reactive antibodies and elapsed time between transplant and the rejection (odds ratio: 2.12, P = .034) and that the other variables analyzed are not related to the expression of C4d.

Allograft rejection and tubulointerstitial fibrosis in human kidney allografts: interrogation by urinary cell mRNA profiling

Because the kidney allograft has the potential to function as an in-vivo flow cytometer and facilitate the access of immune cells and kidney parenchymal cells in to the urinary space, we hypothesized that mRNA profiling of urinary cells offers a noninvasive means of assessing the kidney allograft status. We overcame the inherent challenges of urinary cell mRNA profiling by developing pre-amplification protocols to compensate for low RNA yield from urinary cells and by developing robust protocols for absolute quantification mRNAs using RT-PCR assays. Armed with these tools, we undertook first single-center studies urinary cell mRNA profiling and then embarked on the multicenter Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-04 study of kidney transplant recipients. We report here our discovery and validation of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of acute cellular rejection and of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA). Our urinary cell mRNA profiling studies, in addition to demonstrating the feasibility of accurate diagnosis of acute cellular rejection and IF/TA in the kidney allograft, advance mechanistic and potentially targetable biomarkers. Interventional trials, guided by urinary cell mRNA profiles, may lead to personalized immunosuppression in recipients of kidney allografts.