Textbook Outcome as a Quality Metric in Liver Transplantation

Use of textbook outcome as a quality metric in hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Textbook outcomes (TOs) represent the optimal course after surgery. To date, no meta-analysis has assessed the pooled TOs of patients undergoing hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery and the effect of TO achievement on patient outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess TO achievement across different studies and to characterize the effect of TO achievement on patient-related outcomes, including disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched (1990-2024). The criteria used to define TO and the median overall TO in HPB surgery were obtained. In addition, a random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effect of TO achievement on 5-year OS and DFS.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies involving 517,304 patients met inclusion criteria. The main criteria used to define TO included absence of readmission and mortality within 30 days after discharge, severe postoperative complications, prolonged hospital stay, and negative surgical margin (R0). Of note, the main factors related to TO achievement were younger patient age and lower American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Overall, the median rates of TOs achieved across procedures were 62.0% (IQR, 48.0%-69.0%) for hepatic procedure, 54.0% (IQR, 41.0%-68.0%) for biliary procedure, 46.0% (IQR, 42.0%-46.5%) for combined hepatopancreatic procedure, 45.0% (IQR, 30.5%-59.0%) for pancreatic procedure, 33.0% (IQR, 32.2%-34.0%) for liver transplantation, and 19.5% (IQR, 16.8%-22.3%) for combined hepatobiliary procedure. TO achievement was associated with improved odds of 5-year OS (odds ratio [OR], 1.22 [95% CI, 1.20-1.24]) and 5-year DFS (OR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.16-1.37]).

CONCLUSION

Overall, hepatic and biliary operations had the highest TO achievement, followed by pancreatic procedures. In contrast, hepatobiliary surgery and liver transplantation had the lowest TO. There was a significant discrepancy in the definition of TO across different studies, highlighting the need for consensus on the definition of TO.

Comparison of textbook outcomes between laparoscopic and open liver resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to clarify whether laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is better than open liver resection (OLR) concerning textbook outcome (TO) achievement for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Data from HCC patients who underwent liver resection from a multicenter database were retrospectively reviewed (n = 2617). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics of the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors that are independently associated with TO.

RESULTS

Before PSM, more aggressive biological characteristics were observed in patients who underwent OLR. After PSM, 771 patients in each group were matched. The overall rate of TO achievement in patients with LLR (78.2%) was higher than that in patients with OLR (71.7%; P < 0.001) after PSM. Subgroup analysis further revealed that LLR was associated with a greater incidence of TO achievement than OLR was in patients who underwent minor liver resection (after PSM; LLR: 83.8% vs. OLR: 73.0%, respectively; P < 0.001) but was similar in those who underwent major liver resection (after PSM; LLR: 68.8% vs. OLR: 65.7%; P = 0.468). Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that the LLR (OR = 0.471, 95% CI 95% CI = 0.361-0.614, P < 0.001) was an independent protective factor against non-TO in patients who underwent minor liver resection but not in those who underwent major liver resection. After PSM, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of patients who underwent OLR (74.6%) and LLR (73.9%) were similar (P = 0.485). Patients with TO had significantly better OS than those without TO, regardless of whether they underwent LLR (TO: 76.5% vs. non-TO: 65.7%, P = 0.005) or OLR (TO: 76.8% vs. non-TO: 69.1%, P = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

LLR favored TO achievement in HCC patients who received minor liver resection but not in those who underwent major liver resection. Patients who achieved TO had better OS regardless of LLR or OLR.

Early Hospital Readmission After Pediatric Liver Transplant: A Retrospective Analysis of the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) Database

INTRODUCTION

Incidence of and risk factors for early hospital readmission (EHR) are poorly defined in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Therefore, we evaluated EHR incidence and risk factors for pediatric liver recipients in a nationally representative sample.

METHODS

Using the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation database, we retrospectively analyzed 2808 pediatric liver-only recipients transplanted 2011-2022. Recipient-, donor-, and center-level characteristics were evaluated as possible risk factors for EHR within 30 days of hospital discharge using multivariable modified Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Overall, 23% (N = 642) of pediatric recipients experienced EHR. Independent risk factors for EHR include diabetes (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 2.33, 95% CI: 1.41-3.86, p = 0.001), history of malignancy (aRR 1.59, 95% CI: 1.19-2.11, p = 0.002), and shorter length of transplant hospitalization. Recipients in the shortest length of stay quartile (median [IQR] 8 [7-9] days) had a ninefold increased risk for EHR compared with recipients in the longest length of stay quartile (34 [28-48] days) (aRR 8.86, 95% CI: 5.68-13.81, p < 0.001). Incidence of EHR did not vary by transplant center and was not associated with other characteristics of the donor (DCD vs. not DCD), recipient (age, race, sex, and diagnosis), procedure (whole vs. split liver, ischemic time), or transplant center.

CONCLUSION

We found the 30-day readmission rate for pediatric liver transplant recipients was 23%. Shorter hospital stays were a major risk factor for EHR, highlighting that longer initial transplant hospital stays may be beneficial for predischarge optimization and coordination of their complex care.

Textbook outcome in short bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Textbook outcome (TO) is a single composite score representing ideal care for a procedure or medical condition. Short bowel syndrome (SBS) patients are at high risk for complications and death. Our aim was to determine the incidence of and predictive factors for a TO in SBS patients.

METHODS

515 adults with SBS were followed for 12 months after initial hospital discharge for SBS. TO was defined based on eight outcome parameters. Demographic data, intestinal anatomy, and nutritional outcome were compared in patients with and without TO.

RESULTS

78 (15 ​%) patients had a TO. The frequency of the different components of TO were: PN ​< ​1 year (39 ​%), BMI >18.5 ​kg/m2 (89 ​%), no stoma (59 ​%), no surgical intervention (71 ​%), no hospital readmission (56 ​%), no vascular access infection (62 ​%), absence of end stage liver disease (96 ​%), and survival (97 ​%). Intestinal remnant length and anatomy type were predictive of a TO.

CONCLUSIONS

A TO is achieved in 15 ​% SBS patients using the selected criteria. This is largely attributable to continued need for PN. Intestinal length and anatomy were independent predictors of TO.

Textbook Outcomes in Solid Transplantation: A Systematic Review

Background

The concept of TO is expanding across various surgical disciplines to establish a standardized, comprehensive quality benchmark. Traditional metrics such as 1-y patient and graft survival have been key for evaluating transplant program performance but are now deemed inadequate because of significant field advancements. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the applicability and validity of textbook outcome (TO) in the setting of solid organ transplantation.

Methods

A structured search, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases on March 10, 2024.

Results

Fourteen articles were identified for inclusion in this review. Of these, 2 studies addressed TO in heart transplantation, 3 in lung transplantation, 2 in kidney transplantation, and 7 in liver transplantation. A subgroup analysis was conducted to categorize the different definitions of TOs and identify the most common reasons for TO failure.

Conclusions

Our systematic review highlights the ongoing efforts in the field of solid organ transplantation to define TO and emphasizes the importance of developing a universally recognized set of TO criteria for each type of transplant. TO provides a valuable framework for transplant centers to benchmark their performance against similar institutions on a risk-adjusted basis and to pinpoint specific areas for enhancing patient outcomes. Even the most successful programs may discover aspects within the composite outcome with scope for improvement.

A critical analysis of surgical outcomes indicators in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: From crude mortality to composite outcomes

BACKGROUND

Indicators of surgical outcomes are designed to objectively evaluate surgical performance, enabling comparisons among surgeons and institutions. In recent years, there has been a surge in complex indicators of perioperative short-term and long-term outcomes. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview and a critical analysis of surgical outcomes indicators, with a special emphasis on hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery.

METHODS

A narrative review of outcome measures was conducted using a combined text and MeSH search strategy to identify relevant articles focused on perioperative outcomes, specifically within HPB surgery.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 624 records, and 94 studies were included in the analysis. Included papers were classified depending on whether they assessed intraoperative or postoperative specific or composite outcomes, and whether they assessed purely clinical or combined clinical and socio-economic indicators. Specific indicators included in composite outcomes were categorized into three main domains: intraoperative metrics, postoperative outcomes, and oncological outcomes. While postoperative mortality, complications, hospital stay and readmission were the indicators most frequently included in composite outcomes, oncological outcomes were rarely considered.

CONCLUSIONS

The evolution of surgical outcomes has shifted from the simplistic assessment of crude mortality rates to complex composite outcomes. Whether the recent explosion of publications on these topics has a clinical impact in real life is questionable. Outcomes from the patient perspective, integrating social and financial indicators, are not yet integrated into most of these composite analytical tools but should not be underestimated.

European validation of the classification for the anticipated difficulty of liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Appropriate risk stratification for the difficulty of liver transplantation (LT) is essential to guide the selection and acceptance of grafts and avoid morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Based on 987 LTs collected from 5 centers, perioperative outcomes were analyzed across the 3 difficulty levels. Each LT was retrospectively scored from 0 to 10. Scores of 0-2, 3-5 and 6-10 were then translated into respective difficulty levels: low, moderate and high. Complications were reported according to the comprehensive complication index (CCI).

RESULTS

The difficulty level of LT in 524 (53%), 323 (32%), and 140 (14%) patients was classified as low, moderate and high, respectively. The values of major intraoperative outcomes, such as cold ischemia time (p = 0.04) and operative time (p < 0.0001) increased gradually with statistically significant values among difficulty levels. There was a corresponding increase in CCI (p = 0.04), severe complication rates (p = 0.05) and length of ICU (p = 0.01) and hospital (p = 0.004) stays across the different difficulty levels.

CONCLUSION

The LT difficulty classification has been validated.

Textbook outcome: A novel metric in heart transplantation outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Assessing heart transplant program quality using short-term survival is insufficient. We define and validate the composite metric textbook outcome and examine its association with overall survival.

METHODS

We identified all primary, isolated adult heart transplants in the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Standard Transplant Analysis and Research files from May 1, 2005, to December 31, 2017. Textbook outcome was defined as length of stay 30 days or less; ejection fraction greater than 50% during 1-year follow-up; functional status 80% to 100% at 1 year; freedom from acute rejection, dialysis, and stroke during the index hospitalization; and freedom from graft failure, dialysis, rejection, retransplantation, and mortality during the first year post-transplant. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Factors independently associated with textbook outcome were used to create a predictive nomogram. Conditional survival at 1 year was measured.

RESULTS

A total of 24,620 patients were identified with 11,169 (45.4%, 95% confidence interval, 44.7-46.0) experiencing textbook outcome. Patients with textbook outcome were more likely free from preoperative mechanical support (odds ratio, 3.504, 95% confidence interval, 2.766 to 4.439, P < .001), free from preoperative dialysis (odds ratio, 2.295, 95% confidence interval, 1.868-2.819, P < .001), to be not hospitalized (odds ratio, 1.264, 95% confidence interval, 1.183-1.349, P < .001), to be nondiabetic (odds ratio, 1.187, 95% confidence interval, 1.113-1.266, P < .001), and to be nonsmokers (odds ratio, 1.160, 95% confidence interval,1.097-1.228, P < .001). Patients with textbook outcome have improved long-term survival relative to patients without textbook outcome who survive at least 1 year (hazard ratio for death, 0.547, 95% confidence interval, 0.504-0.593, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Textbook outcome is an alternative means of examining heart transplant outcomes and is associated with long-term survival. The use of textbook outcome as an adjunctive metric provides a holistic view of patient and center outcomes.

Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation: Early Challenges, Clinical Improvement, and Future Directions

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver allografts remain a widely underutilized source of donor organs for transplantation. Although initially linked with inferior outcomes, DCD liver transplant can achieve excellent patient and graft survival with suitable matching of donor and recipient characteristics, rapid donor recovery and precise donor assessment, and appropriate perioperative management. The advent of clinical liver perfusion modalities promises to redefine the viability parameters for DCD liver allografts and hopefully will encourage more widespread usage of this growing source of donor livers.

Patients' perceptions of the definition of a textbook outcome following liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

A textbook outcome (TO) describes the results of a successful liver transplantation (LT) in which all aspects of the LT and posttransplant courses were uneventful. We compared patient perceived experience of a TO with clinically defined TO.

METHODS

This was a single-institution cohort study with retrospective chart review including patients who underwent LT from 2019 to 2021. Patients were asked to complete the survey at a scheduled posttransplant visit. The survey was designed to assess their viewpoints on the definition of a TO. A clinically defined TO was defined as no mortality, no severe complications, no need for reintervention, no prolonged hospital and intensive care unit stays, and no readmission.

RESULTS

Of the 182 patients who were contacted, 132 (72.5%) completed the survey. Overall, 98 patients (74%) considered that they had experienced a TO. The clinically defined TO rate was 22.0%. Multivariate analysis showed that patients who did not experience severe complications were more likely to consider that they had a TO (P = 0.01; odds ratio: 3.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.3-7.9).

CONCLUSIONS

From patients' perspectives, survival and avoidance of complications were the major characteristics of a TO.

Textbook outcomes in heart transplantation: A quality metric for the modern era

BACKGROUND

Traditional quality metrics like one-year survival do not fully encapsulate the multifaceted nature of solid organ transplantation in contemporary practice. Therefore, investigators have proposed using a more comprehensive measure, the textbook outcome. However, the textbook outcome remains ill-defined in the setting of heart transplantation.

METHODS

Within the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database, the textbook outcome was defined as having: (1) No postoperative stroke, pacemaker insertion, or dialysis, (2) no extracorporeal membrane oxygenation requirement within 72 hours of transplantation, (3) index length of stay <21 days, (4) no acute rejection or primary graft dysfunction, (5) no readmission for rejection or infection, or re-transplantation within one year, and (6) an ejection fraction >50% at one year.

RESULTS

Of 26,885 heart transplantation recipients between 2011 to 2022, 9,841 (37%) achieved a textbook outcome. Following adjustment, textbook outcome patients demonstrated significantly reduced hazard of mortality at 5- (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.65-0.78; P < .001) and 10-years (hazard ratio 0.73, CI 0.68-0.79; P < .001), and significantly greater likelihood of graft survival at 5- (hazard ratio 0.69, CI 0.63-0.75; P < .001) and 10-years (hazard ratio 0.72, CI 0.67-0.77; P < .001). Following estimation of random effects, hospital-specific, risk-adjusted rates of textbook outcome ranged from 39% to 91%, compared to a range of 97% to 99% for one-year patient survival. Multi-level modeling of post-transplantation rates of textbook outcomes revealed that 9% of the variation between transplant programs was attributable to inter-hospital differences.

CONCLUSION

Textbook outcomes offer a nuanced, composite alternative to using one-year survival when evaluating heart transplantation outcomes and comparing transplant program performance.