The Relationship Between Health Literacy and Outcomes Before and After Kidney Transplantation

HELP-KIDNEY: Health Literacy and Patient Outcomes in Pediatric Kidney Transplant

BACKGROUND

Below adequate health literacy is common and linked to increased risk of adverse health outcomes. Supporting optimal health following kidney transplantation requires the capacity to understand health information and make decisions about care. The impact of low health literacy in the context of pediatric kidney transplant has not previously been studied.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study sought to determine the relationship between caregiver or patient health literacy and healthcare utilization (outpatient hospital visits, days in hospital) and to explore relationships between health literacy and adherence to tacrolimus (trough level coefficient of variation) and allograft function post-transplant.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included in the analysis. 60% were identified as having adequate literacy using the Newest Vital Sign (NVS). Lower health literacy was significantly correlated with increased healthcare utilization in the first 3 months post-transplant (rs = -0.36, p = 0.024) and in the first year post-transplant (rs = -0.35, p = 0.029). No association was demonstrated between health literacy level and number of days admitted to the hospital (rs = -0.16, p = 0.321), adherence to tacrolimus 6-12 months post-transplant (rs = 0.078, p = 0.68), or change in allograft function 2 years post-transplant (rs = -0.13, p = 0.43).

CONCLUSION

Limited health literacy is common in pediatric kidney transplant recipients and families and is associated with increased frequency of hospital and outpatient clinic department visits early post-transplant. In this small-sized cohort, we did not identify a relationship between health literacy level and hospitalization days, allograft function, or tacrolimus adherence. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between health literacy and transplant outcomes in children and test interventions that may improve communication and optimize care.

Preliminary Evaluation of 2 Patient-Centered Educational Animations About Kidney Transplant Complications

BACKGROUND Fear of kidney transplant complications and incomplete information can lower transplant acceptance and preparedness. Our group developed 2 patient-centered educational animated videos on common kidney transplant complications to complement a previously developed video-based curriculum intended to promote kidney transplant access. MATERIAL AND METHODS We preliminarily evaluated the 2 animated educational videos at a single center using mixed methods. We conducted a before-and-after single group study with 22 patients after kidney transplantation to measure the videos' acceptability and feasibility to improve patient knowledge, understanding, and concerns of kidney transplant complications. Concurrently, we individually interviewed 12 patients before kidney transplantation about their perceptions of the 2 videos and analyzed the data thematically. RESULTS Knowledge of kidney transplant complications increased 10% (7.82 to 8.59, P=0.002) from before to after video viewing. Large effect size increases for knowledge were found for different strata of age, race, and health literacy. The mean total score for perceived understanding of kidney transplant complications increased after video exposure by 7% (mean 2.48 to 2.66, P=0.184). There was no change in kidney transplant concern scores from before to after video viewing (mean 1.70 to 1.70, P=1.00). After video viewing, all patients reported positive ratings on comfort watching, understanding, and engaging. Three themes of patient perceptions emerged: (1) messages received as intended, (2) felt informed, and (3) scared but not deterred. CONCLUSIONS Two animated educational videos about kidney transplant complications were well received and promise to positively impact individuals' knowledge and understanding, without raising excessive concerns.

Nutritional Considerations for Patients With Renal Failure Undergoing Sleeve Gastrectomy

Obesity is highly prevalent in patients with renal disease, as it contributes to or accelerates the progression of kidney disease and is frequently a barrier to kidney transplantation. Patients with renal disease have unique dietary needs due to various metabolic disturbances resulting from altered processing and clearance of nutrients. They also frequently present with physical disability, resulting in difficulty achieving adequate weight loss through lifestyle modifications. Therefore, kidney transplant candidates may benefit from bariatric surgery, particularly sleeve gastrectomy (SG), as the safest, most effective, and long-lasting weight loss option to improve comorbidities and access to transplantation. However, concerns regarding nutritional risks prevent broader dissemination of SG in this population. No specific guidelines tailored to the nutritional needs of patients with renal disease undergoing SG have been developed. Moreover, appropriate monitoring strategies and interventions for muscle loss and functional status preservation, a major concern in this at-risk population, are unknown. We aimed to summarize the available literature on the nutritional requirements of patients with renal disease seeking SG as a bridge to transplantation. We also provide insight and guidance into the nutritional management pre and post-SG.

Is Non-Adherence Associated with Adverse Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients? The Role of Non-Adherence as a Risk and Predictor Factor for Graft Loss and Death

Introduction

 Non-adherence in kidney transplants is diversely defined. Immunosuppression non-adherence (INA) is the most used definition and has been associated with graft loss and acute rejection. But INA assesses only one fraction of adherence. Therefore, we analyzed the association of a holistic non-adherence definition with transplant outcomes and compared its prediction performance with other definitions.

Methods

 We retrospectively included 739 kidney recipients between 2019 and 2021. We evaluated holistic non-adherence (HNA), suboptimal-immunosuppressor levels (SIL), appointment non-adherence (ANA), procedure non-adherence (PNA) and INA. The main outcomes were graft loss, graft rejection, and mortality. A backward logistic regression was performed estimating adjusted and un-adjusted odds ratio (OR) for each outcome. Finally, we compared the non-adherence definitions' prediction for the main outcomes using the area under the curve.

Results

HNA was present in 28.7% of patients. Non-adherent patients had an adjusted OR of 2.66 (1.37-5.15) for mortality, 6.44 for graft loss (2.71-16.6), and 2.28 (1.15-4.47) for graft rejection. INA and PNA presented a moderate discrimination for graft loss and HNA and ANA mild-to-moderate discrimination for graft loss and death.

Conclusion

Holistic non-adherence was associated with worst outcomes in kidney recipients and had a significant prediction performance for graft loss and mortality.