1
|
Chen W, Hong L, Lin S, Xian N, Yan C, Zhao N, Xiao Y, Liao W, Huang Y, Chen M. Enhanced anti-tumor efficacy of "IL-15 and CCL19" -secreting CAR-T cells in human glioblastoma orthotopic xenograft model. Front Oncol 2025; 15:1539055. [PMID: 40177238 PMCID: PMC11962218 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1539055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2025] [Indexed: 04/05/2025] Open
Abstract
Despite the remarkable success of CAR-T cell therapy in hematologic malignancies, its progress in solid tumors has been slow. Overcoming challenges such as the recruitment and infiltration of CAR-T cells into the tumor site and the survival issues in the harsh tumor microenvironment are crucial for successful application in solid tumors. In this study, CAR-T cells were engineered to secrete both IL-15 and CCL19, and their efficacy was evaluated in a human glioblastoma orthotopic xenograft model. The results reveal that 15 × 19 CAR-T cells exhibit superior proliferation, chemotaxis, and phenotypic characteristics compared to conventional CAR-T cells in vitro. In vivo, 15 × 19 CAR-T cells exhibit superior control over tumors compared to conventional counterparts. Mechanistically, the improved efficacy can be attributed, in part, to IL-15 and CCL19 enhancing T-cell infiltration at the tumor site and fortifying resistance to exhaustion within the tumor microenvironment. In conclusion, the incorporation of IL-15 and CCL19 into CAR-T cells emerges as a promising strategy to elevate the anti-tumor efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy, positioning 15 × 19 CAR-T cells as a potential breakthrough for enhancing the application of CAR-T therapy in solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanqiong Chen
- School of Pharmacy, Quanzhou Medical College, Quanzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Limian Hong
- Department of Pharmacy, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Shaomei Lin
- School of Pharmacy, Quanzhou Medical College, Quanzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Na Xian
- Institute of Immunotherapy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Tcelltech Biological Science and Technology Inc., Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Cailing Yan
- Public Technology Service Center, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Ningning Zhao
- Laboratory Animal Center, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yonglei Xiao
- Institute of Immunotherapy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Wanting Liao
- School of Pharmacy, Quanzhou Medical College, Quanzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yuxiang Huang
- School of Pharmacy, Quanzhou Medical College, Quanzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Mingzhu Chen
- School of Pharmacy, Quanzhou Medical College, Quanzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nisnboym M, Sneiderman CT, Jaswal AP, Xiong Z, Vincze SR, Sever RE, Zou H, Frederico SC, Agnihotri S, Hu B, Drappatz J, Pollack IF, Kohanbash G, Raphael I. Assessment of anti-CD69 antibody therapy alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 in murine GBM. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2025; 21:239-247. [PMID: 39402706 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2024.2412770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2024] [Accepted: 09/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive cancer with limited treatment options. Immunotherapy targeting CD69, an early activation marker on T cells, has shown promise in preclinical models of non-CNS malignancies. This study investigates anti-CD69 therapy alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 in a preclinical GBM model. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS CD69 expression in GBM patient tissues was analyzed using the TCGA database. Therapeutic efficacy of anti-CD69 was tested in a murine GBM model with different regimens. Immune cell populations in the tumor microenvironment (TME) were assessed by flow cytometry. RESULTS Increased CD69 expression was observed in GBM patients compared to normal brain tissue and was associated with worse prognosis. Anti-CD69 treatment reduced percentages of CD69+ immune cells but did not improve survival in GBM-bearing mice. Increased PD-1 expression on NK cells was observed following anti-CD69 treatment. Anti-CD69 treatment was not improved by the addition of anti-PD-1 in vivo. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study evaluating anti-CD69 therapy in a preclinical GBM model. Despite promising preclinical data in other cancers, anti-CD69 monotherapy or combination therapy with anti-PD-1 did not improve survival in this GBM model.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Animals
- Glioblastoma/immunology
- Glioblastoma/drug therapy
- Glioblastoma/therapy
- Antigens, Differentiation, T-Lymphocyte/immunology
- Antigens, Differentiation, T-Lymphocyte/metabolism
- Mice
- Lectins, C-Type/immunology
- Lectins, C-Type/antagonists & inhibitors
- Lectins, C-Type/metabolism
- Antigens, CD/immunology
- Antigens, CD/metabolism
- Humans
- Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors
- Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/immunology
- Brain Neoplasms/immunology
- Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Brain Neoplasms/therapy
- Immunotherapy/methods
- Tumor Microenvironment/immunology
- Disease Models, Animal
- Killer Cells, Natural/immunology
- Cell Line, Tumor
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use
- Female
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Nisnboym
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Chaim T Sneiderman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ambika P Jaswal
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Zujian Xiong
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sarah R Vincze
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - ReidAnn E Sever
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Han Zou
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Stephen C Frederico
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sameer Agnihotri
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Baoli Hu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jan Drappatz
- Departments of Neurology and Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ian F Pollack
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Gary Kohanbash
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Itay Raphael
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shu Y, Li J. Disulfidptosis as a key regulator of glioblastoma progression and immune cell impairment. Front Immunol 2025; 16:1526296. [PMID: 39949776 PMCID: PMC11821639 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1526296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/13/2025] [Indexed: 02/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma, associated with poor prognosis and impaired immune function, shows potential interactions between newly identified disulfidptosis mechanisms and T cell exhaustion, yet these remain understudied. Methods Key genes were identified using Lasso regression, followed by multivariate analysis to develop a prognostic model. Single-cell pseudotemporal analysis explored disulfidptosis T-cell exhaustion (Tex) signaling in cell differentiation. Immune infiltration was assessed via ssGSEA, while transwell assays and immunofluorescence examined the effects of disulfidptosis-Tex genes on glioma cell behavior and immune response. Results Eleven disulfidptosis-Tex genes were found critical for glioblastoma survival outcomes. This gene set underpinned a model predicting patient prognosis. Single-cell analysis showed high disulfidptosis-Tex activity in endothelial cells. Memory T cell populations were linked to these genes. SMC4 inhibition reduced LN299 cell migration and increased chemotherapy sensitivity, decreasing CD4 and CD8 T cell activation. Conclusions Disulfidptosis-Tex genes are pivotal in glioblastoma progression and immune interactions, offering new avenues for improving anti-glioblastoma therapies through modulation of T cell exhaustion.
Collapse
|
4
|
Rodriguez SMB, Tataranu LG, Kamel A, Turliuc S, Rizea RE, Dricu A. Glioblastoma and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Glance at Available Treatment Options and Future Directions. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:10765. [PMID: 39409094 PMCID: PMC11477435 DOI: 10.3390/ijms251910765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2024] [Revised: 09/29/2024] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is known to be one of the most aggressive and fatal human cancers, with a poor prognosis and resistance to standard treatments. In the last few years, many solid tumor treatments have been revolutionized with the help of immunotherapy. However, this type of treatment has failed to improve the results in glioblastoma patients. Effective immunotherapeutic strategies may be developed after understanding how glioblastoma achieves tumor-mediated immune suppression in both local and systemic landscapes. Biomarkers may help identify patients most likely to benefit from this type of treatment. In this review, we discuss the use of immunotherapy in glioblastoma, with an emphasis on immune checkpoint inhibitors and the factors that influence clinical response. A Pubmed data search was performed for all existing information regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors used for the treatment of glioblastoma. All data evaluating the ongoing clinical trials involving the use of ICIs either as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs was compiled and analyzed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Mara Baez Rodriguez
- Neurosurgical Department, Bagdasar-Arseni Clinical Emergency Hospital, 041915 Bucharest, Romania; (S.M.B.R.); (A.K.); (R.E.R.)
| | - Ligia Gabriela Tataranu
- Neurosurgical Department, Bagdasar-Arseni Clinical Emergency Hospital, 041915 Bucharest, Romania; (S.M.B.R.); (A.K.); (R.E.R.)
- Neurosurgical Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020022 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Amira Kamel
- Neurosurgical Department, Bagdasar-Arseni Clinical Emergency Hospital, 041915 Bucharest, Romania; (S.M.B.R.); (A.K.); (R.E.R.)
| | - Serban Turliuc
- Medical Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “G. T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Radu Eugen Rizea
- Neurosurgical Department, Bagdasar-Arseni Clinical Emergency Hospital, 041915 Bucharest, Romania; (S.M.B.R.); (A.K.); (R.E.R.)
- Neurosurgical Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020022 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Anica Dricu
- Biochemistry Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020022 Bucharest, Romania;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shah S, Lucke-Wold B. Image-Guided Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sodium Iodide Symporter (NIS) Radionuclide Therapy for Glioblastoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2892. [PMID: 39199662 PMCID: PMC11352884 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16162892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2024] [Revised: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive, invasive, and growth factor-independent grade IV glioma. Survival following the diagnosis is generally poor, with a median survival of approximately 15 months, and it is considered the most aggressive and lethal central nervous system tumor. Conventional treatments based on surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy only delay progression, and death is inevitable. Malignant glioma cells are resistant to traditional therapies, potentially due to a subpopulation of glioma stem cells that are invasive and capable of rapid regrowth. METHODS This is a literature review. The systematic retrieval of information was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. Specified keywords were used in PubMed and the articles retrieved were published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and were associated with brain GBM cancer and the sodium iodide symporter (NIS). Additionally, the words 'radionuclide therapy OR mesenchyma, OR radioiodine OR iodine-131 OR molecular imaging OR gene therapy OR translational imaging OR targeted OR theranostic OR symporter OR virus OR solid tumor OR combined therapy OR pituitary OR plasmid AND glioblastoma OR GBM OR GB OR glioma' were also used in the appropriate literature databases of PubMed and Google Scholar. A total of 68,244 articles were found in this search on Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sodium Iodide Symporter and GBM. These articles were found till 2024. To study recent advances, a filter was added to include articles only from 2014 to 2024, duplicates were removed, and articles not related to the title were excluded. These came out to be 78 articles. From these, nine were not retrieved and only seven were selected after the removal of keyword mismatched articles. Appropriate studies were isolated, and important information from each of them was understood and entered into a database from which the information was used in this article. RESULTS As a result of their natural capacity to identify malignancies, MSCs are employed as tumor therapy vehicles. Because MSCs may be transplanted using several methods, they have been proposed as the ideal vehicles for NIS gene transfer. MSCs have been used as a delivery vector for anticancer drugs in many tumor models due to their capacity to move precisely to malignancies. Also, by directly injecting radiolabeled MSCs into malignant tumors, a therapeutic dosage of beta radiation may be deposited, with the added benefit that the tumor would only localize and not spread to the surrounding healthy tissues. CONCLUSION The non-invasive imaging-based detection of glioma stem cells presents an alternate means to monitor the tumor and diagnose and evaluate recurrence. The sodium iodide symporter gene is a specific gene in a variety of human thyroid diseases that functions to move iodine into the cell. In recent years, an increasing number of studies related to the sodium iodide symporter gene have been reported in a variety of tumors and as therapeutic vectors for imaging and therapy. Gene therapy and nuclear medicine therapy for GBM provide a new direction. In all the preclinical studies reviewed, image-guided cell therapy led to greater survival benefits and, therefore, has the potential to be translated into techniques in glioblastoma treatment trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddharth Shah
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA;
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen E, Ling AL, Reardon DA, Chiocca EA. Lessons learned from phase 3 trials of immunotherapy for glioblastoma: Time for longitudinal sampling? Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:211-225. [PMID: 37995317 PMCID: PMC10836778 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM)'s median overall survival is almost 21 months. Six phase 3 immunotherapy clinical trials have recently been published, yet 5/6 did not meet approval by regulatory bodies. For the sixth, approval is uncertain. Trial failures result from multiple factors, ranging from intrinsic tumor biology to clinical trial design. Understanding the clinical and basic science of these 6 trials is compelled by other immunotherapies reaching the point of advanced phase 3 clinical trial testing. We need to understand more of the science in human GBMs in early trials: the "window of opportunity" design may not be best to understand complex changes brought about by immunotherapeutic perturbations of the GBM microenvironment. The convergence of increased safety of image-guided biopsies with "multi-omics" of small cell numbers now permits longitudinal sampling of tumor and biofluids to dissect the complex temporal changes in the GBM microenvironment as a function of the immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexander L Ling
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David A Reardon
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - E Antonio Chiocca
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kringel R, Lamszus K, Mohme M. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Glioblastoma-Current Concepts and Promising Future. Cells 2023; 12:1770. [PMID: 37443804 PMCID: PMC10340625 DOI: 10.3390/cells12131770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive primary brain tumor that is largely refractory to treatment and, therefore, invariably relapses. GBM patients have a median overall survival of 15 months and, given this devastating prognosis, there is a high need for therapy improvement. One of the therapeutic approaches currently tested in GBM is chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy. CAR-T cells are genetically altered T cells that are redirected to eliminate tumor cells in a highly specific manner. There are several challenges to CAR-T cell therapy in solid tumors such as GBM, including restricted trafficking and penetration of tumor tissue, a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), as well as heterogeneous antigen expression and antigen loss. In addition, CAR-T cells have limitations concerning safety, toxicity, and the manufacturing process. To date, CAR-T cells directed against several target antigens in GBM including interleukin-13 receptor alpha 2 (IL-13Rα2), epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and ephrin type-A receptor 2 (EphA2) have been tested in preclinical and clinical studies. These studies demonstrated that CAR-T cell therapy is a feasible option in GBM with at least transient responses and acceptable adverse effects. Further improvements in CAR-T cells regarding their efficacy, flexibility, and safety could render them a promising therapy option in GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Malte Mohme
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany; (R.K.); (K.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barden MM, Omuro AM. Top advances of the year: Neuro-oncology. Cancer 2023; 129:1467-1472. [PMID: 36825454 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
Management of brain tumors has been challenging given the limited therapeutic options and disabling morbidities associated with central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction. This review focuses on recent developments in the field, with an emphasis on clinical management. The growing clinical trials landscape reflects advanced insights into cancer immunology and genomics and the need to address molecular and clinical heterogeneity. Recent phase 3 trials investigating anti-PD-1 immunotherapies, particularly nivolumab, have failed to demonstrate improved survival in glioblastoma, underscoring the need to better understand the complexity of CNS immunologic surveillance. Conversely, targeted therapies have accounted for several US Food and Drug Administration approvals extended to brain tumors, particularly therapies directed to BRAF V600E mutations and TRAK fusions, underscoring a need to routinely screen patients for these rare molecular abnormalities. In primary CNS lymphoma, attention has turned to long-term outcomes of consolidation therapies, and recent studies have highlighted the excellent disease control afforded by high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Meningiomas remain a focus of investigations, with preliminary promising results observed with octreotide combined with mTOR inhibition, and immunotherapy with single-agent pembrolizumab. Finally, proton radiotherapy has emerged as a novel alternative for leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors, which can now be treated more safely with craniospinal irradiation and monitored by the enumeration of circulating tumor cells in the cerebrospinal fluid as a biomarker. Taken together, these incremental advances have improved outcomes in select brain tumor patient populations, whereas ongoing clinical trials hold the promise of meaningful advances and breakthroughs for larger proportions of patients with brain tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary M Barden
- Yale Cancer Center and Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Antonio M Omuro
- Yale Cancer Center and Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Faisal SM, Comba A, Varela ML, Argento AE, Brumley E, Abel C, Castro MG, Lowenstein PR. The complex interactions between the cellular and non-cellular components of the brain tumor microenvironmental landscape and their therapeutic implications. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1005069. [PMID: 36276147 PMCID: PMC9583158 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1005069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM), an aggressive high-grade glial tumor, is resistant to therapy and has a poor prognosis due to its universal recurrence rate. GBM cells interact with the non-cellular components in the tumor microenvironment (TME), facilitating their rapid growth, evolution, and invasion into the normal brain. Herein we discuss the complexity of the interactions between the cellular and non-cellular components of the TME and advances in the field as a whole. While the stroma of non-central nervous system (CNS) tissues is abundant in fibrillary collagens, laminins, and fibronectin, the normal brain extracellular matrix (ECM) predominantly includes proteoglycans, glycoproteins, and glycosaminoglycans, with fibrillary components typically found only in association with the vasculature. However, recent studies have found that in GBMs, the microenvironment evolves into a more complex array of components, with upregulated collagen gene expression and aligned fibrillary ECM networks. The interactions of glioma cells with the ECM and the degradation of matrix barriers are crucial for both single-cell and collective invasion into neighboring brain tissue. ECM-regulated mechanisms also contribute to immune exclusion, resulting in a major challenge to immunotherapy delivery and efficacy. Glioma cells chemically and physically control the function of their environment, co-opting complex signaling networks for their own benefit, resulting in radio- and chemo-resistance, tumor recurrence, and cancer progression. Targeting these interactions is an attractive strategy for overcoming therapy resistance, and we will discuss recent advances in preclinical studies, current clinical trials, and potential future clinical applications. In this review, we also provide a comprehensive discussion of the complexities of the interconnected cellular and non-cellular components of the microenvironmental landscape of brain tumors to guide the development of safe and effective therapeutic strategies against brain cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed M. Faisal
- Dept. of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Dept. of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Andrea Comba
- Dept. of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Dept. of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Maria L. Varela
- Dept. of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Dept. of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Anna E. Argento
- Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Emily Brumley
- Dept. of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Dept. of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Clifford Abel
- Dept. of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Dept. of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Maria G. Castro
- Dept. of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Dept. of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Pedro R. Lowenstein
- Dept. of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Dept. of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- *Correspondence: Pedro R. Lowenstein,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Omuro A. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors for glioblastoma: what have we learned? ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2022; 80:266-269. [PMID: 35976319 PMCID: PMC9491432 DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x-anp-2022-s129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma, the most common malignant primary brain tumor, remains a lethal disease with few therapeutic options. Immunotherapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi), have revolutionized cancer treatment, but their role in glioblastoma is uncertain. OBJECTIVE To review the state of immunotherapies in glioblastoma, with an emphasis on recently published ICPi clinical trials. METHODS In this editorial/opinion article, we critically review results of the first generation of trials of ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab in glioblastoma, as well as future directions. RESULTS Expression of PD-L1 is frequent in glioblastoma, ranging from 60-70% of patients. Phase 1 studies of nivolumab with and without ipilimumab, as well as pembrolizumab, showed no new safety concerns in brain tumors, and no neurotoxicity. However, randomized phase 3 trials of nivolumab showed no survival improvements over bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma; no role in newly diagnosed disease as a replacement for temozolomide in unmethylated MGMT promoter tumors; and no benefit as an addition to temozolomide in methylated MGMT tumors. However, studies examining post treatment tumor samples have shown signs of increased immunologic response, and occasional long lasting radiographic responses have been seen. A small study of pembrolizumab suggested a potential role as a "neoadjuvant" treatment in resectable recurrent glioblastoma, while other studies are investigating selection of patients with higher mutational burden and novel agents and combinatorial strategies. CONCLUSION Despite initial negative trials, immunotherapy remains of high interest in glioblastoma, and many trials are still ongoing. Improving our mechanistic understanding of the immunosuppression and T cell dysfunction induced by both tumor and the CNS microenvironment remains however crucial for the development of successful immunotherapeutic approaches in this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Omuro
- Yale University, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jiménez-Morales S, Aranda-Uribe IS, Pérez-Amado CJ, Ramírez-Bello J, Hidalgo-Miranda A. Mechanisms of Immunosuppressive Tumor Evasion: Focus on Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Front Immunol 2021; 12:737340. [PMID: 34867958 PMCID: PMC8636671 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.737340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a malignancy with high heterogeneity in its biological features and treatments. Although the overall survival (OS) of patients with ALL has recently improved considerably, owing to the application of conventional chemo-therapeutic agents, approximately 20% of the pediatric cases and 40-50% of the adult patients relapse during and after the treatment period. The potential mechanisms that cause relapse involve clonal evolution, innate and acquired chemoresistance, and the ability of ALL cells to escape the immune-suppressive tumor response. Currently, immunotherapy in combination with conventional treatment is used to enhance the immune response against tumor cells, thereby significantly improving the OS in patients with ALL. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms of immune evasion by leukemia cells could be useful for developing novel therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Jiménez-Morales
- Laboratorio de Genómica del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Ivan Sammir Aranda-Uribe
- Laboratorio de Genómica del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica, Mexico City, Mexico
- Departamento de Farmacología, División de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Quintana Roo, Quintana Roo, Mexico
| | - Carlos Jhovani Pérez-Amado
- Laboratorio de Genómica del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica, Mexico City, Mexico
- Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Bioquímicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Julian Ramírez-Bello
- Departamento de Endocrinología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Alfredo Hidalgo-Miranda
- Laboratorio de Genómica del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|