Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Patients Following Low Anterior Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Pelvic floor rehabilitation in cancer survivorship: an umbrella review

PURPOSE

This umbrella review aimed to identify, critically appraise, and summarize current systematic reviews with meta-analyses on the role of pelvic floor rehabilitation in cancer survivorship.

METHODS

Four bibliographic databases were searched from inception to August 1, 2024. Two independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of 379 records and retrieved 24 full-text systematic reviews. Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 was used for quality assessment. Qualitative syntheses were performed to compile the effects of pelvic floor rehabilitation on bladder function, bowel function, quality of life, and other outcomes. Measures of effect sizes of these outcomes in each meta-analysis were extracted and summarized.

RESULTS

Seventeen systematic reviews with meta-analyses published between 2012 and 2024 were included in this umbrella review, containing a total of 92 primary studies. For quality assessment, four studies were evaluated as moderate quality, five as low, and eight as critically low. Populations with prostate, colorectal, and gynecological cancer were studied. Effects of pelvic floor rehabilitation on bladder, bowel, sexual function, and quality of life were reported and synthesized.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic floor rehabilitation is an essential component of cancer survivorship, including following prostate, colorectal, and gynecological cancer surgery. Further high-quality primary studies with adequate sample sizes are needed to inform clinical practice and research endeavors.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

This umbrella review highlights the therapeutic potential of pelvic floor rehabilitation, underscores the need for its broader implementation in survivorship care, and guides future research directions to optimize outcomes for cancer survivors.

The Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises on Bowel Evacuation and Quality of Life in Following Intestinal Ostomy Closure: Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

This purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFMEs) on bowel evacuation problems and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) following ostomy closure.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

Forty individuals following ostomy closure consented to participate in the study; 6 participants (15%) did not complete the trial (2 died and 2 required a second ostomy) yielding a study sample of 34. Participants were randomly allocated to an Exercise Group (EG, n = 17) and Control Group (CG, n = 17). The mean age of the EG was 55.7 (SD 12.6) years, whereas the mean age of the CG was 62.0 (SD 12.1) years. The study setting was the surgery clinic of 4 hospitals in Ankara, Turkey. Data were collected between December 2018 and May 2020.

METHODS

The study intervention, PFME training by a clinician, was administered to participants in the EG; CG participants received no information regarding PFME. Data were collected during face-to-face interviews on the day before discharge and by phone at the first, second, third, and sixth months after surgery. A questionnaire was used for data collection that queried a demographic and pertinent clinical questions, along with the Assessment Form for Bowel Evacuation Habits and Psychosocial Problems, Wexner Scale, and the Short Form (SF-36) Health-related Quality of Life Scale. Descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney U test, t-test, Pearson-χ2 test, Fisher's Exact test, Friedman test, and Cochran-Q test statistical analysis according to normal distribution were used in data evaluation.

RESULTS

The number of defecations in the EG was statistically significantly lower than the CG at the second, third, and sixth months (P = .002, P = .002, P = .001, respectively). In addition, the number of individuals experiencing night defecation was statistically significantly less in the EG compared to the CG at the second-, third-, and sixth-month follow-ups (P = .001, P = .001, P = .028, respectively). HRQOL scores were also significantly higher in the EG.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic floor exercises applied after ostomy closure are effective in reducing bowel evacuation and increasing quality of life. Given these findings, PFMEs are recommended for patients after ostomy closure.

The effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions on fecal incontinence and quality of life following colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To investigate the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions compared to control conditions on fecal incontinence (FI) and quality of life (QoL) following colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Electronic searches in English-language (Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Ovid, and PEDro) and Chinese-language (CNKI, Wanfang Data) databases were conducted. Trials comparing physiotherapy interventions against control conditions and assessing FI and QoL outcomes were included in the review.

RESULTS

Ten trials were included. Meta-analysis revealed statistically significant improvements in lifestyle (0.54; 95% CI 0.03, 1.05; p = 0.04), coping behavior (MD 1.136; 95% CI 0.24, 2.04; p = 0.01), and embarrassment (0.417; 95% CI 0.14, 0.70; p = 0.00) components of QoL among individuals receiving pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) compared with those receiving usual care (UC). Meta-analysis showed biofeedback to be significantly more effective than UC in enhancing anal resting pressure (ARP; 9.551; 95% CI 2.60, 16.51; p = 0.007), maximum squeeze pressure (MSP; 25.29; 95% CI 4.08, 48.50; p = 0.02), and rectal resting pressure (RRP; 0.51; 95% CI 0.10, 0.9; p = 0.02). Meta-analysis also found PFMT combined with biofeedback to be significantly more effective than PFMT alone for ARP (3.00; 95% CI 0.40, 5.60; p = 0.02), MSP (9.35, 95% CI 0.17, 18.53; p = 0.05), and RRP (1.54; 95% CI 0.60, 2.47; p = 0.00).

CONCLUSIONS

PFMT combined with biofeedback was more effective than PFMT alone, but both interventions delivered alone were superior to UC. Future studies remain necessary to optimize and standardize the PFMT parameters for improving QoL among individuals who experience FI following CRC surgery.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

This systematic review is registered in the PROSPERO registry (Ref: CRD42022337084).

Efficacy of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Postoperative Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) for fecal incontinence (FI) and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) after colorectal cancer surgery. This systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the effects of PFMT after colorectal cancer surgery, which were extracted from several databases in January 2023. The primary outcomes were FI (Wexner scores), HR-QOL, and adverse events. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence (CoE). A total of seven RCTs were included. Our SR results suggested that PFMT showed little to no difference in FI (mean difference 0.62 higher; 95% CI: -1.26 to 2.5, low CoE) and adverse events (risk ratio 5.78; 95% CI: 0.28-117.22, low CoE). Two adverse events occurred in the PFMT group (anastomotic stenosis, suboptimal use of laxatives) and were not observed in controls. HR-QOL was measured in two RCTs using 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) and fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL). Two RCTs found no trend toward a positive impact on HR-QOL. Higher quality RCTs on colorectal cancer after surgery are required. Furthermore, extending the duration of the PFMT intervention may be necessary to ensure its success.

Effects of a bowel function improvement program for patients with rectal cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a bowel function improvement program for male patients with rectal cancer who underwent low anterior resection.

METHODS

A prospective, unblinded, and randomized controlled trial was conducted. The enrolled 42 patients were assigned to the experimental or control group at a 1:1 ratio. The bowel function improvement program comprised a 4-week intensive program (face-to-face education and telephone coaching) and an 8-week maintenance program (text messages). Self-efficacy, bowel function, health-related quality of life, and healthcare resource utilization were measured. Collected data were analyzed using independent t-tests, chi-square tests, analysis of covariance, and generalized estimation equations to evaluate the effects of the program based on intention-to-treat.

RESULTS

The bowel function improvement program was effective in improving bowel function 3 months after discharge. Additionally, the number of unplanned pharmacy visits was lower in the experimental group than in the control group. Health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, and utilization of other healthcare resources were not statistically or clinically significant.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicated that the bowel function improvement program for male patients with rectal cancer was effective in improving bowel function and reducing unplanned healthcare resource utilization. The bowel function improvement program can be delivered as a nurse-led program in clinical practice to promote early recovery after low anterior resection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

KCT0003505. https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do/13708.