1
|
Wang Z, Deisboeck TS. Dynamic Targeting in Cancer Treatment. Front Physiol 2019; 10:96. [PMID: 30890944 PMCID: PMC6413712 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
With the advent of personalized medicine, design and development of anti-cancer drugs that are specifically targeted to individual or sets of genes or proteins has been an active research area in both academia and industry. The underlying motivation for this approach is to interfere with several pathological crosstalk pathways in order to inhibit or at the very least control the proliferation of cancer cells. However, after initially conferring beneficial effects, if sub-lethal, these artificial perturbations in cell function pathways can inadvertently activate drug-induced up- and down-regulation of feedback loops, resulting in dynamic changes over time in the molecular network structure and potentially causing drug resistance as seen in clinics. Hence, the targets or their combined signatures should also change in accordance with the evolution of the network (reflected by changes to the structure and/or functional output of the network) over the course of treatment. This suggests the need for a "dynamic targeting" strategy aimed at optimizing tumor control by interfering with different molecular targets, at varying stages. Understanding the dynamic changes of this complex network under various perturbed conditions due to drug treatment is extremely challenging under experimental conditions let alone in clinical settings. However, mathematical modeling can facilitate studying these effects at the network level and beyond, and also accelerate comparison of the impact of different dosage regimens and therapeutic modalities prior to sizeable investment in risky and expensive clinical trials. A dynamic targeting strategy based on the use of mathematical modeling can be a new, exciting research avenue in the discovery and development of therapeutic drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhihui Wang
- Mathematics in Medicine Program, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Thomas S Deisboeck
- Department of Radiology, Harvard-MIT (HST) Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li XL, Oduola WO, Qian L, Dougherty ER. Integrating Multiscale Modeling with Drug Effects for Cancer Treatment. Cancer Inform 2016; 14:21-31. [PMID: 26792977 PMCID: PMC4712979 DOI: 10.4137/cin.s30797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2015] [Revised: 11/08/2015] [Accepted: 11/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In this paper, we review multiscale modeling for cancer treatment with the incorporation of drug effects from an applied system's pharmacology perspective. Both the classical pharmacology and systems biology are inherently quantitative; however, systems biology focuses more on networks and multi factorial controls over biological processes rather than on drugs and targets in isolation, whereas systems pharmacology has a strong focus on studying drugs with regard to the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) relations accompanying drug interactions with multiscale physiology as well as the prediction of dosage-exposure responses and economic potentials of drugs. Thus, it requires multiscale methods to address the need for integrating models from the molecular levels to the cellular, tissue, and organism levels. It is a common belief that tumorigenesis and tumor growth can be best understood and tackled by employing and integrating a multifaceted approach that includes in vivo and in vitro experiments, in silico models, multiscale tumor modeling, continuous/discrete modeling, agent-based modeling, and multiscale modeling with PK/PD drug effect inputs. We provide an example application of multiscale modeling employing stochastic hybrid system for a colon cancer cell line HCT-116 with the application of Lapatinib drug. It is observed that the simulation results are similar to those observed from the setup of the wet-lab experiments at the Translational Genomics Research Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangfang L. Li
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX, USA
| | - Wasiu O. Oduola
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX, USA
| | - Lijun Qian
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX, USA
| | - Edward R. Dougherty
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Duffy DJ. Problems, challenges and promises: perspectives on precision medicine. Brief Bioinform 2015; 17:494-504. [DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbv060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
|
4
|
D'Alessandro LA, Hoehme S, Henney A, Drasdo D, Klingmüller U. Unraveling liver complexity from molecular to organ level: challenges and perspectives. PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2014; 117:78-86. [PMID: 25433231 DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2014] [Revised: 10/28/2014] [Accepted: 11/19/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Biological responses are determined by information processing at multiple and highly interconnected scales. Within a tissue the individual cells respond to extracellular stimuli by regulating intracellular signaling pathways that in turn determine cell fate decisions and influence the behavior of neighboring cells. As a consequence the cellular responses critically impact tissue composition and architecture. Understanding the regulation of these mechanisms at different scales is key to unravel the emergent properties of biological systems. In this perspective, a multidisciplinary approach combining experimental data with mathematical modeling is introduced. We report the approach applied within the Virtual Liver Network to analyze processes that regulate liver functions from single cell responses to the organ level using a number of examples. By facilitating interdisciplinary collaborations, the Virtual Liver Network studies liver regeneration and inflammatory processes as well as liver metabolic functions at multiple scales, and thus provides a suitable example to identify challenges and point out potential future application of multi-scale systems biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L A D'Alessandro
- Division Systems Biology of Signal Transduction, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), INF 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Hoehme
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Bioinformatics (IZBI), University of Leipzig, Germany
| | - A Henney
- Obsidian Biomedical Consulting Ltd., Macclesfield, UK; The German Virtual Liver Network, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - D Drasdo
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Bioinformatics (IZBI), University of Leipzig, Germany; Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (INRIA), Domaine de Voluceau, 78150 Rocquencourt, France; University Pierre and Marie Curie and CNRS UMR 7598, LJLL, F-75005 Paris, France; CNRS, 7598 Paris, France
| | - U Klingmüller
- Division Systems Biology of Signal Transduction, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), INF 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Geenen S, Taylor PN, Snoep JL, Wilson ID, Kenna JG, Westerhoff HV. Systems biology tools for toxicology. Arch Toxicol 2012; 86:1251-71. [PMID: 22569772 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-012-0857-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2012] [Accepted: 04/12/2012] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
An important goal of toxicology is to understand and predict the adverse effects of drugs and other xenobiotics. For pharmaceuticals, such effects often emerge unexpectedly in man even when absent from trials in vitro and in animals. Although drugs and xenobiotics act on molecules, it is their perturbation of intracellular networks that matters. The tremendous complexity of these networks makes it difficult to understand the effects of xenobiotics on their ability to function. Because systems biology integrates data concerning molecules and their interactions into an understanding of network behaviour, it should be able to assist toxicology in this respect. This review identifies how in silico systems biology tools, such as kinetic modelling, and metabolic control, robustness and flux analyse, may indeed help understanding network-mediated toxicity. It also shows how these approaches function by implementing them vis-à-vis the glutathione network, which is important for the detoxification of reactive drug metabolites. The tools enable the appreciation of the steady state concept for the detoxification network and make it possible to simulate and then understand effects of perturbations of the macromolecules in the pathway that are counterintuitive. We review how a glutathione model has been used to explain the impact of perturbation of the pathway at various molecular sites, as would be the effect of single-nucleotide polymorphisms. We focus on how the mutations impact the levels of glutathione and of two candidate biomarkers of hepatic glutathione status. We conclude this review by sketching how the various systems biology tools may help in the various phases of drug development in the pharmaceutical industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Geenen
- Manchester Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, University of Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Benson N, Cucurull-Sanchez L, Demin O, Smirnov S, van der Graaf P. Reducing systems biology to practice in pharmaceutical company research; selected case studies. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2012; 736:607-15. [PMID: 22161355 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7210-1_36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Reviews of the productivity of the pharmaceutical industry have concluded that the current business model is unsustainable. Various remedies for this have been proposed, however, arguably these do not directly address the fundamental issue; namely, that it is the knowledge required to enable good decisions in the process of delivering a drug that is largely absent; in turn, this leads to a disconnect between our intuition of what the right drug target is and the reality of pharmacological intervention in a system such as a human disease state. As this system is highly complex, modelling will be required to elucidate emergent properties together with the data necessary to construct such models. Currently, however, both the models and data available are limited. The ultimate solution to the problem of pharmaceutical productivity may be the virtual human, however, it is likely to be many years, if at all, before this goal is realised. The current challenge is, therefore, whether systems modelling can contribute to improving productivity in the pharmaceutical industry in the interim and help to guide the optimal route to the virtual human. In this context, this chapter discusses the emergence of systems pharmacology in drug discovery from the interface of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling and systems biology. Examples of applications to the identification of optimal drug targets in given pathways, selecting drug modalities and defining biomarkers are discussed, together with future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Benson
- Modelling and simulation, Department of Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Worldwide Research, Pfizer Ltd., Sandwich CT13 9NJ, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
van der Graaf PH, Benson N. Systems Pharmacology: Bridging Systems Biology and Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics (PKPD) in Drug Discovery and Development. Pharm Res 2011; 28:1460-4. [DOI: 10.1007/s11095-011-0467-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 194] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2011] [Accepted: 04/28/2011] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
8
|
Levi F, Mosekilde E, Rand DA. Advancing systems medicine and therapeutics through biosimulation. Interface Focus 2010. [DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2010.0019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Francis Levi
- U776, INSERM, hôpital Paul Brousse, 14-16 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, Villejuif, France
| | - Erik Mosekilde
- Department of Physics, Technical University of Denmark, Fysikvej 309, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - David A. Rand
- Warwick Systems Biology Centre and Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry House, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|