Analytical cell size distribution: lineage-population bias and parameter inference

From noisy cell size control to population growth: When variability can be beneficial

Single-cell experiments revealed substantial variability in generation times, growth rates, but also in birth and division sizes between genetically identical cells. Understanding how these fluctuations determine the fitness of the population, i.e., its growth rate, is necessary in any quantitative theory of evolution. Here, we develop a biologically relevant model which accounts for the stochasticity in single-cell growth rates, birth sizes, and division sizes. We derive expressions for the population growth rate and mean birth size in the population in terms of single-cell fluctuations. Allowing division sizes to fluctuate reveals how the mechanism of cell size control (timer, sizer, and adder) influences population growth. Surprisingly, we find that fluctuations in single-cell growth rates can be beneficial for population growth when slow-growing cells tend to divide at smaller sizes than fast-growing cells. Our framework is not limited to exponentially growing cells like Escherichia coli, and we derive similar expressions for cells with linear and bilinear growth laws, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis and fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, respectively.

Parasite infection in a cell population: role of the partitioning kernel

We consider a cell population subject to a parasite infection. Cells divide at a constant rate and, at division, share the parasites they contain between their two daughter cells. The sharing may be asymmetric, and its law may depend on the number of parasites in the mother. Cells die at a rate which may depend on the number of parasites they carry, and are also killed when this number explodes. We study the survival of the cell population as well as the mean number of parasites in the cells, and focus on the role of the parasites partitioning kernel at division.

Mechanisms of cell size regulation in slow-growing Escherichia coli cells: discriminating models beyond the adder

Under ideal conditions, Escherichia coli cells divide after adding a fixed cell size, a strategy known as the adder. This concept applies to various microbes and is often explained as the division that occurs after a certain number of stages, associated with the accumulation of precursor proteins at a rate proportional to cell size. However, under poor media conditions, E. coli cells exhibit a different size regulation. They are smaller and follow a sizer-like division strategy where the added size is inversely proportional to the size at birth. We explore three potential causes for this deviation: degradation of the precursor protein and two models where the propensity for accumulation depends on the cell size: a nonlinear accumulation rate, and accumulation starting at a threshold size termed the commitment size. These models fit the mean trends but predict different distributions given the birth size. To quantify the precision of the models to explain the data, we used the Akaike information criterion and compared them to open datasets of slow-growing E. coli cells in different media. We found that none of the models alone can consistently explain the data. However, the degradation model better explains the division strategy when cells are larger, whereas size-related models (power-law and commitment size) account for smaller cells. Our methodology proposes a data-based method in which different mechanisms can be tested systematically.

Coupling Cell Size Regulation and Proliferation Dynamics of C. glutamicum Reveals Cell Division Based on Surface Area

Single cells actively coordinate growth and division to regulate their size, yet how this size homeostasis at the single-cell level propagates over multiple generations to impact clonal expansion remains fundamentally unexplored. Classical timer models for cell proliferation (where the duration of the cell cycle is an independent variable) predict that the stochastic variation in colony size will increase monotonically over time. In stark contrast, implementing size control according to adder strategy (where on average a fixed size added from cell birth to division) leads to colony size variations that eventually decay to zero. While these results assume a fixed size of the colony-initiating progenitor cell, further analysis reveals that the magnitude of the intercolony variation in population number is sensitive to heterogeneity in the initial cell size. We validate these predictions by tracking the growth of isogenic microcolonies of Corynebacterium glutamicum in microfluidic chambers. Approximating their cell shape to a capsule, we observe that the degree of random variability in cell size is different depending on whether the cell size is quantified as per length, surface area, or volume, but size control remains an adder regardless of these size metrics. A comparison of the observed variability in the colony population with the predictions suggests that proliferation matches better with a cell division based on the cell surface. In summary, our integrated mathematical-experimental approach bridges the paradigms of single-cell size regulation and clonal expansion at the population levels. This innovative approach provides elucidation of the mechanisms of size homeostasis from the stochastic dynamics of colony size for rod-shaped microbes.