Mutagenesis in eukaryotes dependent on DNA polymerase zeta and Rev1p

Characterization of environmental chemicals with potential for DNA damage using isogenic DNA repair-deficient chicken DT40 cell lines

Included among the quantitative high throughput screens (qHTS) conducted in support of the US Tox21 program are those being evaluated for the detection of genotoxic compounds. One such screen is based on the induction of increased cytotoxicity in seven isogenic chicken DT40 cell lines deficient in DNA repair pathways compared to the parental DNA repair-proficient cell line. To characterize the utility of this approach for detecting genotoxic compounds and identifying the type(s) of DNA damage induced, we evaluated nine of 42 compounds identified as positive for differential cytotoxicity in qHTS (actinomycin D, adriamycin, alachlor, benzotrichloride, diglycidyl resorcinol ether, lovastatin, melphalan, trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene, tris(2,3-epoxypropyl)isocyanurate) and one non-cytotoxic genotoxic compound (2-aminothiamine) for (1) clastogenicity in mutant and wild-type cells; (2) the comparative induction of γH2AX positive foci by melphalan; (3) the extent to which a 72-hr exposure duration increased assay sensitivity or specificity; (4) the use of 10 additional DT40 DNA repair-deficient cell lines to better analyze the type(s) of DNA damage induced; and (5) the involvement of reactive oxygen species in the induction of DNA damage. All compounds but lovastatin and 2-aminothiamine were more clastogenic in at least one DNA repair-deficient cell line than the wild-type cells. The differential responses across the various DNA repair-deficient cell lines provided information on the type(s) of DNA damage induced. The results demonstrate the utility of this DT40 screen for detecting genotoxic compounds, for characterizing the nature of the DNA damage, and potentially for analyzing mechanisms of mutagenesis.

Effect of sequence context and direction of replication on AP site bypass in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Yeast can be readily transformed by single-stranded oligonucleotides (ssOligos). Previously, we showed that an ssOligo that generates a 1-nt loop containing an AP site corrected the -1 frameshift mutation in the lys2DeltaA746 allele. However, these experiments had to be performed in yeast apn1 mutants lacking the major AP endonuclease. In this study, we show that bypass of an AP site can be studied in repair-proficient yeast by using ssOligos that generates a 7-nt loop containing an AP site. The bypass studies performed using the ssOligos that generate a 7-nt loop was validated by demonstrating that the result obtained is similar to those derived using ssOligos containing a 1-nt loop in an apn1 mutant. By using the 7-nt loop system, we showed that the bypass efficiencies of AP sites are dependent on the sequence context that surrounds the lesion and are apparently not affected by the direction of DNA replication. In contrast, the mutagenic specificity of an AP site is not affected by the sequence context or the direction of replication. In all cases, dC is inserted at twice the frequency of dA opposite an AP site, indicating that REV1 is mainly responsible for bypass of AP sites at all lesion sites studied.

Multiple functions of DNA polymerases

The primary role of DNA polymerases is to accurately and efficiently replicate the genome in order to ensure the maintenance of the genetic information and its faithful transmission through generations. This is not a simple task considering the size of the genome and its constant exposure to endogenous and environmental DNA damaging agents. Thus, a number of DNA repair pathways operate in cells to protect the integrity of the genome. In addition to their role in replication, DNA polymerases play a central role in most of these pathways. Given the multitude and the complexity of DNA transactions that depend on DNA polymerase activity, it is not surprising that cells in all organisms contain multiple highly specialized DNA polymerases, the majority of which have only recently been discovered. Five DNA polymerases are now recognized in Escherichia coli, 8 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and at least 15 in humans. While polymerases in bacteria, yeast and mammalian cells have been extensively studied much less is known about their counterparts in plants. For example, the plant model organism Arabidopsis thaliana is thought to contain 12 DNA polymerases, whose functions are mostly unknown. Here we review the properties and functions of DNA polymerases focusing on yeast and mammalian cells but paying special attention to the plant enzymes and the special circumstances of replication and repair in plant cells.