1
|
Chevin LM, Bridle J. Impacts of limits to adaptation on population and community persistence in a changing environment. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2025; 380:20230322. [PMID: 39780591 PMCID: PMC11712278 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2024] [Revised: 10/04/2024] [Accepted: 10/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
A key issue in predicting how ecosystems will respond to environmental change is understanding why populations and communities are able to live and reproduce in some parts of ecological and geographical space, but not in others. The limits to adaptation that cause ecological niches to vary in position and width across taxa and environmental contexts determine how communities and ecosystems emerge from selection on phenotypes and genomes. Ecological trade-offs mean that phenotypes can only be optimal in some environments unless these trade-offs can be reshaped through evolution. However, the amount and rate of evolution are limited by genetic architectures, developmental systems (including phenotypic plasticity) and the legacies of recent evolutionary history. Here, we summarize adaptive limits and their ecological consequences in time (evolutionary rescue) and space (species' range limits), relating theoretical predictions to empirical tests. We then highlight key avenues for future research in this area, from better connections between evolution and demography to analysing the genomic architecture of adaptation, the dynamics of plasticity and interactions between the biotic and abiotic environment. Progress on these questions will help us understand when and where evolution and phenotypic plasticity will allow species and communities to persist in the face of rapid environmental change.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Bending the curve towards nature recovery: building on Georgina Mace's legacy for a biodiverse future'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jon Bridle
- Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stewart JE, Maclean IMD, Botham M, Dennis EB, Bridle J, Wilson RJ. Phenological variation in biotic interactions shapes population dynamics and distribution in a range-shifting insect herbivore. Proc Biol Sci 2024; 291:20240529. [PMID: 39626755 PMCID: PMC11614537 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 07/31/2024] [Accepted: 10/18/2024] [Indexed: 12/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Phenological responses to climate change vary across trophic levels. However, how trophic phenological synchrony determines species' distributions through its effects on population dynamics has rarely been addressed. Here, we show that phenological variation underlies population and geographical range dynamics in a range-shifting herbivore, and demonstrate its interplay with changing trophic interactions. Using a novel modelling approach, we identify drivers of variation in phenology and population growth (productivity) for populations of the brown argus butterfly (Aricia agestis) feeding on ancestral and novel host plants in the UK. We demonstrate host plant-specific links between phenology and productivity, highlighting their role in the consumer's range expansion. Critically, later butterfly phenology is associated with higher productivity in the annual second brood, especially on novel annual hosts where later activity improves synchrony with germinating plants. In turn, later phenology and higher second brood productivity are associated with more rapid range expansion, particularly in regions where only the novel hosts occur. Therefore, phenological asynchrony imposes limits on local population growth, influencing consumer resource selection, evolutionary responses and emergent range dynamics. How existing and future trophic phenological synchrony determine population dynamics will be critical for the ecological and evolutionary outcomes of climate change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E. Stewart
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Ilya M. D. Maclean
- Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Exeter, UK
| | - Marc Botham
- Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, OxfordshireOX10 8BB, UK
| | - Emily B. Dennis
- Butterfly Conservation, Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset, UK
| | - Jon Bridle
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Department of Genetics, Evolution, and Environment, University College London, London, UK
| | - Robert J. Wilson
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Exeter, UK
- Departmento de Biogeografía y Cambio Global, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, MadridE28006, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bastias CC, Estarague A, Vile D, Gaignon E, Lee CR, Exposito-Alonso M, Violle C, Vasseur F. Ecological trade-offs drive phenotypic and genetic differentiation of Arabidopsis thaliana in Europe. Nat Commun 2024; 15:5185. [PMID: 38890286 PMCID: PMC11189578 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49267-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Plant diversity is shaped by trade-offs between traits related to competitive ability, propagule dispersal, and stress resistance. However, we still lack a clear understanding of how these trade-offs influence species distribution and population dynamics. In Arabidopsis thaliana, recent genetic analyses revealed a group of cosmopolitan genotypes that successfully recolonized Europe from its center after the last glaciation, excluding older (relict) lineages from the distribution except for their north and south margins. Here, we tested the hypothesis that cosmopolitans expanded due to higher colonization ability, while relicts persisted at the margins due to higher tolerance to competition and/or stress. We compared the phenotypic and genetic differentiation between 71 European genotypes originating from the center, and the south and north margins. We showed that a trade-off between plant fecundity and seed mass shapes the differentiation of A. thaliana in Europe, suggesting that the success of the cosmopolitan groups could be explained by their high dispersal ability. However, at both north and south margins, we found evidence of selection for alleles conferring low dispersal but highly competitive and stress-resistance abilities. This study sheds light on the role of ecological trade-offs as evolutionary drivers of the distribution and dynamics of plant populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina C Bastias
- CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
- Área de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Córdoba, Spain.
| | - Aurélien Estarague
- CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France
- LEPSE, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Denis Vile
- LEPSE, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Elza Gaignon
- CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France
| | - Cheng-Ruei Lee
- Institute of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology & Institute of Plant Biology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Cyrille Violle
- CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Jong M, van Rensburg AJ, Whiteford S, Yung CJ, Beaumont M, Jiggins C, Bridle J. Rapid evolution of novel biotic interactions in the UK Brown Argus butterfly uses genomic variation from across its geographical range. Mol Ecol 2023; 32:5742-5756. [PMID: 37800849 DOI: 10.1111/mec.17138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
Understanding the rate and extent to which populations can adapt to novel environments at their ecological margins is fundamental to predicting the persistence of biological communities during ongoing and rapid global change. Recent range expansion in response to climate change in the UK butterfly Aricia agestis is associated with the evolution of novel interactions with a larval food plant, and the loss of its ability to use an ancestral host species. Using ddRAD analysis of 61,210 variable SNPs from 261 females from throughout the UK range of this species, we identify genomic regions at multiple chromosomes that are associated with evolutionary responses, and their association with demographic history and ecological variation. Gene flow appears widespread throughout the range, despite the apparently fragmented nature of the habitats used by this species. Patterns of haplotype variation between selected and neutral genomic regions suggest that evolution associated with climate adaptation is polygenic, resulting from the independent spread of alleles throughout the established range of this species, rather than the colonization of pre-adapted genotypes from coastal populations. These data suggest that rapid responses to climate change do not depend on the availability of pre-adapted genotypes. Instead, the evolution of novel forms of biotic interaction in A. agestis has occurred during range expansion, through the assembly of novel genotypes from alleles from multiple localities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maaike de Jong
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alexandra Jansen van Rensburg
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK
| | - Samuel Whiteford
- Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Carl J Yung
- Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mark Beaumont
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Chris Jiggins
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jon Bridle
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rafajlović M, Alexander JM, Butlin RK, Johannesson K. Introduction to the theme issue 'Species' ranges in the face of changing environments'. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2022; 377:20210002. [PMID: 35184596 PMCID: PMC8859519 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding where, when and how species' ranges will be modified is both a fundamental problem and essential to predicting how spatio-temporal environmental changes in abiotic and biotic factors impact biodiversity. Notably, different species may respond disparately to similar environmental changes: some species may overcome an environmental change only with difficulty or not at all, while other species may readily overcome the same change. Ranges may contract, expand or move. The drivers and consequences of this variability in species' responses remain puzzling. Importantly, changes in a species' range creates feedbacks to the environmental conditions, populations and communities in its previous and current range, rendering population genetic, population dynamic and community processes inextricably linked. Understanding these links is critical in guiding biodiversity management and conservation efforts. This theme issue presents current thinking about the factors and mechanisms that limit and/or modify species' ranges. It also outlines different approaches to detect changes in species' distributions, and illustrates cases of range modifications in several taxa. Overall, this theme issue highlights the urgency of understanding species' ranges but shows that we are only just beginning to disentangle the processes involved. One way forward is to unite ecology with evolutionary biology and empirical with modelling approaches. This article is part of the theme issue 'Species' ranges in the face of changing environments (Part II)'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Rafajlović
- Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Centre for Marine Evolutionary Biology, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jake M. Alexander
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Roger K. Butlin
- Centre for Marine Evolutionary Biology, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
- Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Tjärnö Marine Laboratory, 452 96 Strömstad, Sweden
| | - Kerstin Johannesson
- Centre for Marine Evolutionary Biology, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Tjärnö Marine Laboratory, 452 96 Strömstad, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bridle J, Hoffmann A. Understanding the biology of species' ranges: when and how does evolution change the rules of ecological engagement? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2022; 377:20210027. [PMID: 35184590 PMCID: PMC8859517 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding processes that limit species' ranges has been a core issue in ecology and evolutionary biology for many decades, and has become increasingly important given the need to predict the responses of biological communities to rapid environmental change. However, we still have a poor understanding of evolution at range limits and its capacity to change the ecological 'rules of engagement' that define these communities, as well as the time frame over which this occurs. Here we link papers in the current volume to some key concepts involved in the interactions between evolutionary and ecological processes at species' margins. In particular, we separate hypotheses about species' margins that focus on hard evolutionary limits, which determine how genotypes interact with their environment, from those concerned with soft evolutionary limits, which determine where and when local adaptation can persist in space and time. We show how theoretical models and empirical studies highlight conditions under which gene flow can expand local limits as well as contain them. In doing so, we emphasize the complex interplay between selection, demography and population structure throughout a species' geographical and ecological range that determines its persistence in biological communities. However, despite some impressively detailed studies on range limits, particularly in invertebrates and plants, few generalizations have emerged that can predict evolutionary responses at ecological margins. We outline some directions for future work such as considering the impact of structural genetic variants and metapopulation structure on limits, and the interaction between range limits and the evolution of mating systems and non-random dispersal. This article is part of the theme issue 'Species' ranges in the face of changing environments (Part II)'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon Bridle
- Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ary Hoffmann
- School of BioSciences, Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|