The relative amount of an influenza A virus segment present in the viral particle is not affected by a reduction in replication of that segment

The Influenza A Virus Replication Cycle: A Comprehensive Review

Influenza A virus (IAV) is the primary causative agent of influenza, colloquially called the flu. Each year, it infects up to a billion people, resulting in hundreds of thousands of human deaths, and causes devastating avian outbreaks with worldwide losses worth billions of dollars. Always present is the possibility that a highly pathogenic novel subtype capable of direct human-to-human transmission will spill over into humans, causing a pandemic as devastating if not more so than the 1918 influenza pandemic. While antiviral drugs for influenza do exist, they target very few aspects of IAV replication and risk becoming obsolete due to antiviral resistance. Antivirals targeting other areas of IAV replication are needed to overcome this resistance and combat the yearly epidemics, which exact a serious toll worldwide. This review aims to summarise the key steps in the IAV replication cycle, along with highlighting areas of research that need more focus.

From threat to cure: understanding of virus-induced cell death leads to highly immunogenic oncolytic influenza viruses

Oncolytic viruses constitute an emerging strategy in immunomodulatory cancer treatment. The first oncolytic virus, Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), based on herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1), was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2015. The field of oncolytic virotherapy is still in its beginnings, since many promising viruses remain only superficially explored. Influenza A virus causes a highly immunogenic acute infection but never leads to a chronic disease. While oncolytic influenza A viruses are in preclinical development, they have not made the transition into clinical practice yet. Recent insights into different types of cell death caused by influenza A virus infection illuminate novel possibilities of enhancing its therapeutic effect. Genetic engineering and experience in influenza A virus vaccine development allow safe application of the virus in patients. In this review we give a summary of efforts undertaken to develop oncolytic influenza A viruses. We discuss strategies for targeting viral replication to cancerous lesions and arming them with immunogenic transgenes. We furthermore describe which modes of cell death are induced by influenza A virus infection and how these insights may be utilized to optimize influenza A virus-based oncolytic virus design.

Identification of a Type-Specific Promoter Element That Differentiates between Influenza A and B Viruses

Type A and type B influenza viruses (FluA and FluB viruses) are two major human pathogens that share common structural and functional features. FluA and FluB viruses can reassort within each type but never between the types. Here, we bioinformatically analyzed all promoter sequences of FluA and FluB viruses and confirmed the presence of the type-specific promoter elements. We then studied the promoter elements with cell-based in vivo assays and an in vitro replication initiation assay. Our results identified, for the first time, a type-specific promoter element-the nucleotide at position 5 in the 3' end of the viral RNA (vRNA)-that plays a key role(s) in modulating polymerase activity in a type-specific manner. Interestingly, swapping the promoter element between FluA and FluB recombinant viruses showed different tolerances: the replacement of FluA virus-specific U5 with FluB virus-specific C5 in influenza virus A/WSN/33 (H1N1) could be reverted to U5 after 2 to 3 passages, while the replacement of FluB virus-specific C5 with FluA virus-specific U5 in influenza virus B/Yamagata/88 could be maintained, but with significantly reduced replication efficiency. Therefore, our findings indicate that the nucleotide variation at position 5 in the 3' end of the vRNA promoter between FluA and FluB viruses contributes to their RNP incompatibility, which may shed new light on the mechanisms of intertypic exclusion of reassortment between FluA and FluB viruses.IMPORTANCE Genetic reassortment of influenza virus plays a key role in virus evolution and the emergence of pandemic strains. The reassortment occurs extensively within either FluA or FluB viruses but never between them. Here, we bioinformatically compared available promoter sequences of FluA and FluB viruses and confirmed the presence of the type-specific promoter elements. Our in vivo and in vitro mutagenesis studies showed that a type-specific promoter element-the nucleotide at position 5 in the 3' end of vRNA promoters-plays key roles in modulating polymerase activity. Interestingly, FluA and FluB viruses showed different tolerances upon key promoter element swapping in the context of virus infections. We concluded that the nucleotide at position 5 in the 3' end of the vRNA promoters of FluA and FluB viruses is a critical type-specific determinant. This work has implications for further elucidating the mechanisms of the intertypic exclusion of reassortment between FluA and FluB viruses.

Implications of segment mismatch for influenza A virus evolution

Influenza A virus (IAV) is an RNA virus with a segmented genome. These viral properties allow for the rapid evolution of IAV under selective pressure, due to mutation occurring from error-prone replication and the exchange of gene segments within a co-infected cell, termed reassortment. Both mutation and reassortment give rise to genetic diversity, but constraints shape their impact on viral evolution: just as most mutations are deleterious, most reassortment events result in genetic incompatibilities. The phenomenon of segment mismatch encompasses both RNA- and protein-based incompatibilities between co-infecting viruses and results in the production of progeny viruses with fitness defects. Segment mismatch is an important determining factor of the outcomes of mixed IAV infections and has been addressed in multiple risk assessment studies undertaken to date. However, due to the complexity of genetic interactions among the eight viral gene segments, our understanding of segment mismatch and its underlying mechanisms remain incomplete. Here, we summarize current knowledge regarding segment mismatch and discuss the implications of this phenomenon for IAV reassortment and diversity.

Heterologous Packaging Signals on Segment 4, but Not Segment 6 or Segment 8, Limit Influenza A Virus Reassortment

Influenza A virus (IAV) RNA packaging signals serve to direct the incorporation of IAV gene segments into virus particles, and this process is thought to be mediated by segment-segment interactions. These packaging signals are segment and strain specific, and as such, they have the potential to impact reassortment outcomes between different IAV strains. Our study aimed to quantify the impact of packaging signal mismatch on IAV reassortment using the human seasonal influenza A/Panama/2007/99 (H3N2) and pandemic influenza A/Netherlands/602/2009 (H1N1) viruses. Focusing on the three most divergent segments, we constructed pairs of viruses that encoded identical proteins but differed in the packaging signal regions on a single segment. We then evaluated the frequency with which segments carrying homologous versus heterologous packaging signals were incorporated into reassortant progeny viruses. We found that, when segment 4 (HA) of coinfecting parental viruses was modified, there was a significant preference for the segment containing matched packaging signals relative to the background of the virus. This preference was apparent even when the homologous HA constituted a minority of the HA segment population available in the cell for packaging. Conversely, when segment 6 (NA) or segment 8 (NS) carried modified packaging signals, there was no significant preference for homologous packaging signals. These data suggest that movement of NA and NS segments between the human H3N2 and H1N1 lineages is unlikely to be restricted by packaging signal mismatch, while movement of the HA segment would be more constrained. Our results indicate that the importance of packaging signals in IAV reassortment is segment dependent.IMPORTANCE Influenza A viruses (IAVs) can exchange genes through reassortment. This process contributes to both the highly diverse population of IAVs found in nature and the formation of novel epidemic and pandemic IAV strains. Our study sought to determine the extent to which IAV packaging signal divergence impacts reassortment between seasonal IAVs. Our knowledge in this area is lacking, and insight into the factors that influence IAV reassortment will inform and strengthen ongoing public health efforts to anticipate the emergence of new viruses. We found that the packaging signals on the HA segment, but not the NA or NS segments, restricted IAV reassortment. Thus, the packaging signals of the HA segment could be an important factor in determining the likelihood that two IAV strains of public health interest will undergo reassortment.

Influenza A virus ribonucleoproteins modulate host recycling by competing with Rab11 effectors

Influenza A virus assembly is an unclear process, whereby individual virion components form an infectious particle. The segmented nature of the influenza A genome imposes a problem to assembly because it requires packaging of eight distinct RNA particles (vRNPs). It also allows genome mixing from distinct parental strains, events associated with influenza pandemic outbreaks. It is important to public health to understand how segmented genomes assemble, a process that is dependent on the transport of components to assembly sites. Previously, it has been shown that vRNPs are carried by recycling endosome vesicles, resulting in a change of Rab11 distribution. Here, we describe that vRNP binding to recycling endosomes impairs recycling endosome function, by competing for Rab11 binding with family-interacting proteins, and that there is a causal relationship between Rab11 ability to recruit family-interacting proteins and Rab11 redistribution. This competition reduces recycling sorting at an unclear step, resulting in clustering of single- and double-membraned vesicles. These morphological changes in Rab11 membranes are indicative of alterations in protein and lipid homeostasis during infection. Vesicular clustering creates hotspots of the vRNPs that need to interact to form an infectious particle.

Selective packaging of the influenza A genome and consequences for genetic reassortment

Influenza A viruses package their segmented RNA genome in a selective manner. Electron tomography, biochemical assays, and replication assays of viruses produced by reverse genetics recently unveiled molecular details of this mechanism, whereby different influenza viral strains form different and unique networks of direct intermolecular RNA-RNA interactions. Together with detailed views of the three-dimensional structure of the viral ribonucleoparticles, these recent advances help us understand the rules that govern genome packaging. They also have deep implications for the genetic reassortment processes, which are responsible for devastating pandemics.

Recombinant influenza A viruses with enhanced levels of PB1 and PA viral protein expression

Influenza A viruses containing the promoter mutations G3A/C8U in a given segment express increased levels of the corresponding viral protein during infection due to increased levels of mRNA or cRNA species. The replication of these recombinant viruses is attenuated, and they have an enhanced shedding of noninfectious particles and are incapable of antagonizing interferon (IFN) effectively. Our findings highlight the possibility of increasing influenza virus protein expression and the need for a delicate balance between influenza viral replication, protein expression, and assembly.

Evolution of the influenza A virus untranslated regions

In case of the influenza virus, untranslated regions are considered to possess plural functions. The specific packaging model suggests that each of eight segments contains a unique "packaging signal", situated within the untranslated region and coding regions at the 5' and 3' ends of the genomic RNA. In addition to packaging signal, UTRs play key roles in polyadenylation and signals for genomic replication. In the present study, we report the evolutionary characteristics of untranslated regions of influenza virus. We analyzed 574 sequences of the human influenza A (H3N2) virus. The sequence of the untranslated region is highly conserved. Our analysis produced several observations regarding the untranslated region: (1) it has an extremely low divergence; (2) its evolutionary speed is not associated with the protein(s) it encodes; (3) its evolutionary rate is smaller than that of the open reading frame. We revealed the evolutionary characteristics of the untranslated region; this is the first study on the non-coding region of the influenza virus from the perspective of evolutionary molecular biology. In the future, clarifying the detailed mechanisms of packaging as well as the function of the RNA sequence in the untranslated region will increase the understanding of viral life cycles and evolution.

Genome packaging in influenza A virus

The negative-sense RNA genome of influenza A virus is composed of eight segments, which encode 12 proteins between them. At the final stage of viral assembly, these genomic virion (v)RNAs are incorporated into the virion as it buds from the apical plasma membrane of the cell. Genome segmentation confers evolutionary advantages on the virus, but also poses a problem during virion assembly as at least one copy of each of the eight segments is required to produce a fully infectious virus particle. Historically, arguments have been presented in favour of a specific packaging mechanism that ensures incorporation of a full genome complement, as well as for an alternative model in which segments are chosen at random but packaged in sufficient numbers to ensure that a reasonable proportion of virions are viable. The question has seen a resurgence of interest in recent years leading to a consensus that the vast majority of virions contain no more than eight segments and that a specific mechanism does indeed function to select one copy of each vRNA. This review summarizes work leading to this conclusion. In addition, we describe recent progress in identifying the specific packaging signals and discuss likely mechanisms by which these RNA elements might operate.

Orthomyxovirus replication, transcription, and polyadenylation

Efficient in vitro and in vivo systems are now in place to study the role of viral proteins in replication and/or transcription, the regulation of these processes, polyadenylation of viral mRNAs, the viral promoter structures, or the significance of noncoding regions for virus replication. In this chapter, we review the status of current knowledge of the orthomyxovirus RNA synthesis.

Genetics of influenza viruses

Influenza A viruses contain genomes composed of eight separate segments of negative-sense RNA. Circulating human strains are notorious for their tendency to accumulate mutations from one year to the next and cause recurrent epidemics. However, the segmented nature of the genome also allows for the exchange of entire genes between different viral strains. The ability to manipulate influenza gene segments in various combinations in the laboratory has contributed to its being one of the best characterized viruses, and studies on influenza have provided key contributions toward the understanding of various aspects of virology in general. However, the genetic plasticity of influenza viruses also has serious potential implications regarding vaccine design, pathogenicity, and the capacity for novel viruses to emerge from natural reservoirs and cause global pandemics.

Differential effect of nucleotide substitutions in the 3' arm of the influenza A virus vRNA promoter on transcription/replication by avian and human polymerase complexes is related to the nature of PB2 amino acid 627

Using a genetic system that allows the in vivo reconstitution of active ribonucleoproteins, the ability to ensure transcription/replication of a viral-like reporter RNA harboring the G(3) --> A(3), U(5) --> C(5), and C(8) --> U(8) mutations (triple 3-5-8 mutations) in the 3' arm of the promoter was examined with core proteins from human or avian strains of influenza A viruses. The efficiency of transcription/replication of the viral-like RNA with the triple 3-5-8 mutations in COS-1 cells was found to be slightly decreased as compared to the wild-type RNA when the polymerase was derived from a human virus. In contrast, it was found to be considerably increased when the polymerase was derived from an avian virus, in agreement with published observations using the avian A/FPV/Bratislava virus (G. Neumann and G. Hobom, 1995, J. Gen. Virol. 76, 1709-1717). This increase could be attributed to the compensation of the defect in transcription/replication activity in the COS-1 mammalian cell line due to the presence of a glutamic acid at PB2 residue 627, characteristic of avian strains of influenza viruses. Our results thus suggest that PB2 and/or cellular proteins interacting with PB2 could be involved in RNA conformational changes during the process of transcription/replication.

Nucleotides at the extremities of the viral RNA of influenza C virus are involved in type-specific interactions with the polymerase complex

Influenza A and C viruses share common sequences in the terminal noncoding regions of the viral RNA segments. Differences at the 5'- and 3'-ends exist, however, that could contribute to the specificity with which the transcription/replication signals are recognized by the cognate polymerase complexes. Previously, by making use of a transient expression system for the transcription and replication of a reporter RNA template bearing either type A or type C extremities, it was shown that a type C RNA template is transcribed and replicated with equal efficiency by either the type A or the type C polymerase complex, whereas a type A RNA template is less efficiently transcribed and replicated by the type C polymerase complex than by the type A complex. To explore the contribution of the nucleotides at the extremities of the RNAs to this type-specificity, the effect of mutations introduced either alone or in combination at nucleotide 5 at the 3'-end and at nucleotides 3', 6' or 8' at the 5'-end of type A or C RNA templates were studied in the presence of either the type A or the type C polymerase complex. The results indicate that the nature of nucleotides 5 and 6' contribute to type-specificity. Moreover, these results underline the importance of the base pairing between nucleotide 3' and 8' at the 5'-end of the RNA. Thus, it could be suggested that the nature of the nucleotides as well as the stability of the secondary structure at the extremities of the viral RNA are important determinants of type-specificity.

"Ambisense" approach for the generation of influenza A virus: vRNA and mRNA synthesis from one template

We present a system for creating influenza virus by generating viral RNA (vRNA) and mRNA from one template. Recently, a system for the generation of influenza A virus entirely from cloned cDNAs was established (Neumann et al., 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 9345-9350). Cells were transfected with plasmids for RNA polymerase I-driven intracellular synthesis of all eight viral RNAs, and with protein expression plasmids for the synthesis of viral structural proteins. Although this system is highly efficient in virus generation, the construction and cotransfection of 17 plasmids is cumbersome and may limit the use of this system to cell lines that can be transfected with high efficiencies. Synthesizing both vRNA and mRNA from one template would reduce the number of plasmids required for virus generation. Therefore, we generated a bidirectional transcription construct that contains cDNA encoding PB1 flanked by an RNA polymerase I (pol I) promoter for vRNA synthesis and an RNA polymerase II (pol II) promoter for mRNA synthesis. The utility of this approach is proved by the generation of virus after transfecting the pol I/pol II-promoter-PB1 construct together with vRNA- and protein-expression constructs for the remaining seven segments. Because this approach reduces the number of plasmids required for virus generation, it also reduces the work necessary for cloning, probably enhances the efficiency of virus generation, and expands the use of the reverse-genetics system to cell lines for which efficient cotransfection of 17 plasmids cannot be achieved.

Segment-specific noncoding sequences of the influenza virus genome RNA are involved in the specific competition between defective interfering RNA and its progenitor RNA segment at the virion assembly step

The generation of influenza A virus defective interfering (DI) particles was studied by using an NS2 mutant which produces, in a single cycle of virus replication, a large amount of DI particles lacking the PA polymerase gene. The decrease in PA gene replication has been shown to occur primarily at the cRNA synthesis step, with preferential amplification of PA DI RNA species present in a marginal amount in the virus stock. In addition, at the assembly step the PA DI RNAs were preferentially incorporated into virions, resulting in selective reduction in the packaging of the PA gene into virions. Similarly, in cells dually infected with the NS2 mutant and wild-type viruses, packaging of the wild-type PA gene was also greatly suppressed. In contrast, incorporation of other RNA segments, i.e., the PB2 and NS genes, was not affected, suggesting that the PA DI RNAs competed only with the PA gene in a segment-specific manner. Experiments involving rescue of recombinant chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) RNA flanked by the noncoding regions of the PA (PA/CAT RNA) and PB2 (PB2/CAT RNA) genes into viral particles showed that only PA/CAT RNA was not rescued by infection with the NS2 mutant virus containing the PA DI RNAs. However, recombinant PA/CAT RNA in which either the 3' or 5' noncoding region was replaced with that of the PB2 gene was rescued by the NS2 mutant. These results suggest that the noncoding regions of the PA gene are responsible for the competition with PA DI RNA species at the virus assembly step and that coexistence of the both noncoding regions would be a prerequisite for this phenomenon. Decreased packaging of the progenitor RNA by the DI RNA, in addition to the suppression of cRNA synthesis, is likely involved in the production of DI particles.

Mutations in the nonconserved noncoding sequences of the influenza A virus segments affect viral vRNA formation

Influenza A virus replication and packaging is mediated by cis-acting signals, which are located at the 3' and the 5' end of the viral segments. The terminal residues can be divided into conserved and nonconserved residues. We have constructed a mutant influenza A/WSN/33 virus, which contains multiple mutations in the nonconserved residues of the neuraminidase (NA) segment. This virus shows a segment-specific reduction of the genomic RNA content in the infected cell and in the progeny virus. Further mutants and revertant viruses revealed that it was not possible to define specific residues, which were responsible for the reduction of the NA-specific RNA. Thus, it appears that an efficient vRNA formation is dependent on the synergistic effect of the terminal sequences.