1
|
Intuy R, Supa-Amornkul S, Jaemsai B, Ruangchai W, Wiriyarat W, Chaturongakul S, Palittapongarnpim P. A novel variant in Salmonella genomic island 1 of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky ST198. Microbiol Spectr 2024; 12:e0399423. [PMID: 38687075 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03994-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky ST198 is a major health threat due to its resistance to ciprofloxacin and several other drugs, including third-generation cephalosporins. Many drug-resistant genes have been identified in the Salmonella genomic island 1 variant K (SGI1-K). In this study, we investigated the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profile and genotypic relatedness of two isolates of ciprofloxacin-resistant (CIPR) S. Kentucky ST198 from poultry in Northeastern Thailand. We successfully assembled the complete genomes of both isolates, namely SSSE-01 and SSSE-03, using hybrid de novo assembly of both short- and long-read sequence data. The complete genomes revealed their highly similar genomic structures and a novel variant of SGI1-K underlying multidrug-resistant (MDR) patterns, including the presence of blaTEM-1b, which confers resistance to beta-lactams, including cephalosporins and lnu(F) which confers resistance to lincomycin and other lincosamides. In addition, the chromosomal mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) were found at positions 83 (Ser83Phe) and 87 (Asp87Asn) of GyrA and at positions 57 (Thr57Ser) and 80 (Ser80Ile) of ParC suggesting high resistance to ciprofloxacin. We also compared SSSE-01 and SSSE-03 with publicly available complete genome data and revealed significant variations in SGI1-K genetic structures and variable relationships to antibiotic resistance. In comparison to the other isolates, SGI1-K of SSSE-01 and SSSE-03 had a relatively large deletion in the backbone, spanning from S011 (traG∆) to S027 (resG), and the inversion of the IS26-S044∆-yidY segment. Their MDR region was characterized by the inversion of a large segment, including the mer operon and the relocation of IntI1 and several resistance genes downstream of the IS26-S044∆-yidY segment. These structural changes were likely mediated by the recombination of IS26. The findings broaden our understanding of the possible evolution pathway of SGI1-K in fostering drug resistance, which may provide opportunities to control these MDR strains.IMPORTANCEThe emergence of ciprofloxacin-resistant (CIPR) Salmonella Kentucky ST198 globally has raised significant concerns. This study focuses on two poultry isolates from Thailand, revealing a distinct Salmonella genomic island 1 variant K (SGI1-K) genetic structure. Remarkably, multiple antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) were identified within the SGI1-K as well as other locations in the chromosome, but not in plasmids. Comparing the SGI1-K genetic structures among global and even within-country isolates unveiled substantial variations. Intriguingly, certain isolates lacked ARGs within the SGI1-K, while others had ARGs relocated outside. The presence of chromosomal extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genes and lincosamide resistance, lnu(F), gene, could potentially inform the choices of the treatment of CIPRS. Kentucky ST198 infections in humans. This study highlights the importance of understanding the diverse genetic structures of SGI1-K and emphasizes the role of animals and humans in the emergence of antimicrobial resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rattanaporn Intuy
- Professor Pornchai Matangkasombut Center for Microbial Genomics (CENMIG), Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sirirak Supa-Amornkul
- Professor Pornchai Matangkasombut Center for Microbial Genomics (CENMIG), Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Department of Oral Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Bharkbhoom Jaemsai
- Professor Pornchai Matangkasombut Center for Microbial Genomics (CENMIG), Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Wuthiwat Ruangchai
- Professor Pornchai Matangkasombut Center for Microbial Genomics (CENMIG), Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Witthawat Wiriyarat
- Department of Pre-Clinical and Applied Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Soraya Chaturongakul
- Professor Pornchai Matangkasombut Center for Microbial Genomics (CENMIG), Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Molecular Medical Biosciences Cluster, Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Prasit Palittapongarnpim
- Professor Pornchai Matangkasombut Center for Microbial Genomics (CENMIG), Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Karama M, Lawal OU, Parreira VR, Soni M, Chen Y, Cenci-Goga BT, Grispoldi L, Greyling J, Goodridge L. Draft genome sequences of two Salmonella Uzaramo isolates from poultry in South Africa. Microbiol Resour Announc 2024; 13:e0102623. [PMID: 38099676 DOI: 10.1128/mra.01026-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Salmonella enterica is a zoonotic pathogen and a leading cause of foodborne gastroenteritis in humans. Here, we report the draft genome sequences of two Salmonella Uzaramo isolates, which were isolated from poultry organs during routine post-mortem examination in South Africa. Currently, whole-genome sequences on Salmonella Uzaramo are scanty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Musafiri Karama
- Veterinary Public Health Section, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria , Onderstepoort, South Africa
| | - Opeyemi U Lawal
- Canadian Research Institute for Food Safety (CRIFS), Department of Food Science, University of Guelph , Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Valeria R Parreira
- Canadian Research Institute for Food Safety (CRIFS), Department of Food Science, University of Guelph , Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mitra Soni
- Canadian Research Institute for Food Safety (CRIFS), Department of Food Science, University of Guelph , Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yanhong Chen
- Canadian Research Institute for Food Safety (CRIFS), Department of Food Science, University of Guelph , Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Beniamino T Cenci-Goga
- Veterinary Public Health Section, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria , Onderstepoort, South Africa
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratorio di Ispezione Degli Alimenti di Origine Animale, University of Perugia , Perugia, Italy
| | - Luca Grispoldi
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratorio di Ispezione Degli Alimenti di Origine Animale, University of Perugia , Perugia, Italy
| | - Janita Greyling
- Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria , Onderstepoort, South Africa
| | - Lawrence Goodridge
- Canadian Research Institute for Food Safety (CRIFS), Department of Food Science, University of Guelph , Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
He B, Zhu TT, Liang Y, Wei HJ, Huang ZL, Liang LJ, Zhong JH, Luo Y, Lian XL, Zhao DH, Liao XP, Liu YH, Ren H, Sun J. Adaptive evolution in asymptomatic host confers MDR Salmonella with enhanced environmental persistence and virulence. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024; 908:168340. [PMID: 37931815 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
As a common cause for food-borne diseases, the Salmonella spp. are generally prevalent among livestock, whereby they are likely to be transmitted to human via environmental contamination. To explore the potential mechanism for prevalence of MDR Salmonella and its risk for dissemination via contaminated environments, we profiled the colonization dynamics of MDR Salmonella in chicken, herein we found that an adaptive evolution, driven by mutagenesis in a small protein-encoding gene (STM14_1829), conferred the multidrug resistant (MDR) Salmonella with increased fitness in asymptomatic host. Then the mechanistic study demonstrated that only one amino acid substitution in small protein STM14_1829 rendered MDR Salmonella capable to better invade and persist in phagocytotic cells by modulating bacterial flagella overexpression. Concerningly, the evolved Salmonella was also more resilient to the potential stressors generally found in environments and food processing, including heat, cold, adverse pH and oxidations. It implied that the evolved subpopulations are plausibly more persistent in environments once they contaminated through animal manure or human excreta. Moreover, the evolution promoted the pathogenesis caused by MDR Salmonella in susceptible hosts, resulting in higher risk for dissemination of pathogens via contaminated environments. Together, our data provided the novel insights into that in vivo adaptive evolution benefits Salmonella colonization, persistence and pathogenesis, by promoting bacterial tolerance via modulating flagella expression. These findings may explain the rationale behind the increasing prevalence of certain MDR Salmonella clones in livestock and associated environment, and underscoring the need for advanced strategies to tackle the possible evolution of such zoonotic pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing He
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China
| | - Ting-Ting Zhu
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China
| | - Yin Liang
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China
| | - Hai-Jing Wei
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China
| | - Zi-Lei Huang
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China
| | - Li-Jie Liang
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China
| | - Jia-Hao Zhong
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China
| | - Yang Luo
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China
| | - Xin-Lei Lian
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China
| | - Dong-Hao Zhao
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China
| | - Xiao-Ping Liao
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China
| | - Ya-Hong Liu
- State Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, PR China
| | - Hao Ren
- State Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
| | - Jian Sun
- State Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
This report by the European Food Safety Authority and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control presents the results of the zoonoses monitoring and surveillance activities carried out in 2022 in 27 Member States (MSs), the United Kingdom (Northern Ireland) and 11 non-MSs. Key statistics on zoonoses and zoonotic agents in humans, food, animals and feed are provided and interpreted historically. In 2022, the first and second most reported zoonoses in humans were campylobacteriosis and salmonellosis, respectively. The number of cases of campylobacteriosis and salmonellosis remained stable in comparison with 2021. Nineteen MSs and the United Kingdom (Northern Ireland) achieved all the established targets in poultry populations for the reduction of Salmonella prevalence for the relevant serovars. Salmonella samples from carcases of various animal species, and samples for Campylobacter quantification from broiler carcases, were more frequently positive when performed by the competent authorities than when own checks were conducted. Yersiniosis was the third most reported zoonosis in humans, followed by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Listeria monocytogenes infections. L. monocytogenes and West Nile virus infections were the most severe zoonotic diseases, with the most hospitalisations and highest case fatality rates. In 2022, reporting showed an increase of more than 600% compared with 2021 in locally acquired cases of human West Nile virus infection, which is a mosquito-borne disease. In the EU, the number of reported foodborne outbreaks and cases, hospitalisations and deaths was higher in 2022 than in 2021. The number of deaths from outbreaks was the highest ever reported in the EU in the last 10 years, mainly caused by L. monocytogenes and to a lesser degree by Salmonella. Salmonella and in particular S. Enteritidis remained the most frequently reported causative agent for foodborne outbreaks. Norovirus (and other calicivirus) was the agent associated with the highest number of outbreak human cases. This report also provides updates on brucellosis, Coxiella burnetii (Q fever), echinococcosis, rabies, toxoplasmosis, trichinellosis, infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (focusing on Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium caprae) and tularaemia.
Collapse
|
5
|
Richards AK, Kue S, Norris CG, Shariat NW. Genomic and phenotypic characterization of Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky. Microb Genom 2023; 9:001089. [PMID: 37750759 PMCID: PMC10569734 DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-typhoidal Salmonella are extremely diverse and different serovars can exhibit varied phenotypes, including host adaptation and the ability to cause clinical illness in animals and humans. In the USA, Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky is infrequently found to cause human illness, despite being the top serovar isolated from broiler chickens. Conversely, in Europe, this serovar falls in the top 10 serovars linked to human salmonellosis. Serovar Kentucky is polyphyletic and has two lineages, Kentucky-I and Kentucky-II; isolates belonging to Kentucky-I are frequently isolated from poultry in the USA, while Kentucky-II isolates tend to be associated with human illness. In this study, we analysed whole-genome sequences and associated metadata deposited in public databases between 2017 and 2021 by federal agencies to determine serovar Kentucky incidence across different animal and human sources. Of 5151 genomes, 90.3 % were from isolates that came from broilers, while 5.9 % were from humans and 3.0 % were from cattle. Kentucky-I isolates were associated with broilers, while isolates belonging to Kentucky-II and a new lineage, Kentucky-III, were more commonly associated with cattle and humans. Very few serovar Kentucky isolates were associated with turkey and swine sources. Phylogenetic analyses showed that Kentucky-III genomes were more closely related to Kentucky-I, and this was confirmed by CRISPR-typing and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). In a macrophage assay, serovar Kentucky-II isolates were able to replicate over eight times better than Kentucky-I isolates. Analysis of virulence factors showed unique patterns across these three groups, and these differences may be linked to their association with different hosts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber K. Richards
- Department of Population Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Song Kue
- Department of Population Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Connor G. Norris
- Department of Population Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Nikki W. Shariat
- Department of Population Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
- Center for Food Safety, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liao X, Deng R, Warriner K, Ding T. Antibiotic resistance mechanism and diagnosis of common foodborne pathogens based on genotypic and phenotypic biomarkers. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2023; 22:3212-3253. [PMID: 37222539 DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.13181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
The emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria due to the overuse or inappropriate use of antibiotics has become a significant public health concern. The agri-food chain, which serves as a vital link between the environment, food, and human, contributes to the large-scale dissemination of antibiotic resistance, posing a concern to both food safety and human health. Identification and evaluation of antibiotic resistance of foodborne bacteria is a crucial priority to avoid antibiotic abuse and ensure food safety. However, the conventional approach for detecting antibiotic resistance heavily relies on culture-based methods, which are laborious and time-consuming. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop accurate and rapid tools for diagnosing antibiotic resistance in foodborne pathogens. This review aims to provide an overview of the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance at both phenotypic and genetic levels, with a focus on identifying potential biomarkers for diagnosing antibiotic resistance in foodborne pathogens. Furthermore, an overview of advances in the strategies based on the potential biomarkers (antibiotic resistance genes, antibiotic resistance-associated mutations, antibiotic resistance phenotypes) for antibiotic resistance analysis of foodborne pathogens is systematically exhibited. This work aims to provide guidance for the advancement of efficient and accurate diagnostic techniques for antibiotic resistance analysis in the food industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyu Liao
- Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- School of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, NingboTech University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
- Future Food Laboratory, Innovation Center of Yangtze River Delta, Zhejiang University, Jiashan, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ruijie Deng
- College of Biomass Science and Engineering, Healthy Food Evaluation Research Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Keith Warriner
- Department of Food Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tian Ding
- Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Future Food Laboratory, Innovation Center of Yangtze River Delta, Zhejiang University, Jiashan, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Biggel M, Horlbog J, Nüesch-Inderbinen M, Chattaway MA, Stephan R. Epidemiological links and antimicrobial resistance of clinical Salmonella enterica ST198 isolates: a nationwide microbial population genomic study in Switzerland. Microb Genom 2022; 8:mgen000877. [PMID: 36301086 PMCID: PMC9676052 DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Salmonella is a leading cause of foodborne outbreaks and systemic infections worldwide. Emerging multi-drug resistant Salmonella lineages such as a ciprofloxacin-resistant subclade (CIPR) within Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky ST198 threaten the effective prevention and treatment of infections. To understand the genomic diversity and antimicrobial resistance gene content associated with S. Kentucky in Switzerland, we whole-genome sequenced 70 human clinical isolates obtained between 2010 and 2020. Most isolates belonged to ST198-CIPR. High- and low-level ciprofloxacin resistance among CIPR isolates was associated with variable mutations in ramR and acrB in combination with stable mutations in quinolone-resistance determining regions (QRDRs). Analysis of isolates from patients with prolonged ST198 colonization indicated subclonal adaptions with the ramR locus as a mutational hotspot. SNP analyses identified multiple clusters of near-identical isolates, which were often associated with travel but included spatiotemporally linked isolates from Switzerland. The largest SNP cluster was associated with travellers returning from Indonesia, and investigation of global data linked >60 additional ST198 salmonellosis isolates to this cluster. Our results emphasize the urgent need for implementing whole-genome sequencing as a routine tool for Salmonella surveillance and outbreak detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Biggel
- Institute for Food Safety and Hygiene, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Jule Horlbog
- Institute for Food Safety and Hygiene, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- National Reference Center for Enteropathogenic Bacteria and Listeria (NENT), Institute for Food Safety and Hygiene, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Roger Stephan
- Institute for Food Safety and Hygiene, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Farooq M, Smoglica C, Ruffini F, Soldati L, Marsilio F, Di Francesco CE. Antibiotic Resistance Genes Occurrence in Conventional and Antibiotic-Free Poultry Farming, Italy. Animals (Basel) 2022; 12:ani12182310. [PMID: 36139170 PMCID: PMC9495165 DOI: 10.3390/ani12182310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance is a complex and widespread problem threatening human and animal health. In poultry farms, a wide distribution of resistant bacteria and their relative genes is described worldwide, including in Italy. In this paper, a comparison of resistance gene distribution in litter samples, recovered from four conventional and four antibiotic-free broiler flocks, was performed to highlight any influence of farming systems on the spreading and maintenance of resistance determinants. Conventional PCR tests, targeting the resistance genes related to the most used antibiotics in poultry farming, along with some critically important antibiotics for human medicine, were applied. In conventional farms, n. 10 out of n. 30 investigated genes were present in at least one sample, the most abundant fragments being the tet genes specific for tetracyclines, followed by those for aminoglycosides and chloramphenicol. All conventional samples resulted negative for colistin, carbapenems, and vancomycin resistance genes. A similar trend was observed for antibiotic-free herds, with n. 13 out of n. 30 amplified genes, while a positivity for the mcr-1 gene, specific for colistin, was observed in one antibiotic-free flock. The statistical analysis revealed a significant difference for the tetM gene, which was found more frequently in the antibiotic-free category. The analysis carried out in this study allowed us to obtain new data about the distribution of resistance patterns in the poultry industry in relation to farming types. The PCR test is a quick and non-expensive laboratory tool for the environmental monitoring of resistance determinants identifying potential indicators of AMR dissemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Farooq
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano D’Accio, 64100 Teramo, Italy
| | - Camilla Smoglica
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano D’Accio, 64100 Teramo, Italy
| | | | - Lidia Soldati
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano D’Accio, 64100 Teramo, Italy
| | - Fulvio Marsilio
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano D’Accio, 64100 Teramo, Italy
| | - Cristina E. Di Francesco
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano D’Accio, 64100 Teramo, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0861-266869
| |
Collapse
|