Epstein-Barr virus, the germinal centre and the development of Hodgkin's lymphoma

Epstein Barr virus: A cellular hijacker in cancer

Numerous studies have demonstrated the importance of the Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), which was initially identified in 1964 while studying Burkitt's lymphoma, in the development of a number of cancers, including nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, Burkitt's lymphoma, and EBV-associated gastric carcinoma. Gammaherpesvirus EBV is extremely common; by adulthood, over 90 % of people worldwide have been infected. Usually, the virus causes a permanent latent infection in B cells, epithelial cells, and NK/T cells. It then contributes to oncogenesis by inhibiting apoptosis and promoting unchecked cell proliferation through its latent proteins, which include EBNA-1, LMP1, and LMP2A. Tumor progression further accelerated by EBV's capacity to transition between latent and lytic phases, especially in cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Although our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of EBV has advanced, there are still difficulties in identifying latent infections and creating targeted therapeutics. To tackle EBV-associated malignancies, current research efforts are concentrated on developing vaccines, developing better diagnostic tools, and developing targeted treatments. In order to improve treatment approaches and lower the incidence of EBV-related cancers worldwide, more research into the relationship between EBV and immune evasion and cancer formation is necessary.

Expression of EBV-encoded genes in children with asymptomatic infection detected by sensitive methods

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is an usually harmless virus whose oncogenic properties in vitro are related to its ability to transform lymphoid cells, and, in consequence, it can be associated with lymphomas. Since a few studies detected EBV presence in supposedly EBV-negative lymphomas, our aim was to evaluate EBV presence by sensitive gene expression assays in the tonsils from healthy pediatric donors from a region with high incidence of EBV-associated lymphomas. EBERs transcripts were detected by View RNA ISH in all cases, even in cases assessed negative by widely used in situ hybridization. The presence of LMP1 transcripts was proved in 93% of cases, co-expressed with EBNA2 in 30%. In this study, evidence for the expression of different latent and lytic viral genes in a population of young age of primary infection, detected with more sensitive methods, in particular at the germinal center, where most EBV-associated lymphomas originate, was provided.

A Clinicopathological Study of Cytomegalovirus Lymphadenitis and Tonsillitis and Their Association with Epstein-Barr Virus

Introduction

Histopathological characteristics of cytomegalovirus (CMV) lymphadenitis have been well described. Rare studies have reported the immune status and clinical features. Clinically, experts believed that CMV lymphadenitis develops in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients. Infectious mononucleosis (IM)-like syndrome is the most well-known clinical presentation.

Methods

We reviewed archived CMV immunohistochemical stains on lymphoid tissues. The clinicopathological features of CMV-positive cases were studied.

Results

For lymph nodes, we detected CMV in 29% (5/17) allogeneic peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) recipients, 29% (4/14) post-autologous PBSCT patients, 13% (6/47) patients treated with intravenous chemotherapy, and 9% (9/96) immunocompetent patients. We detected CMV in 7% (2/24) of tonsils but not in the nasopharynx, tongue base, or spleen specimens. The patients with iatrogenic immunodeficiency ranged from 37 to 76 years old. CMV infections developed a few years after lymphoma treatment (median duration after allogeneic PBSCT, 932 days; after autologous PBSCT, 370 days; and after chemotherapy, 626 days). The most common clinical presentation was neck mass (13/25, 42%), followed by asymptomatic image finding (10/25, 40%). Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan showed increased uptake compared to the liver in all patients (11/11, 100%). Of 10 lymphoma patients, 8 (80%) had a Deauville score of 4–5; they accounted for 30% (8/27) of lymphoma patients with false-positive PET/CT scan results. All cases were self-limiting. 96% (23/25) cases had Epstein–Barr virus coinfection, and EBER-positive cells were predominantly in a few germinal centers.

Conclusions

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) lymphadenitis and tonsillitis were subclinical infections, not primary CMV infection with IM-like syndrome. The lymphadenopathy typically developed a few years after lymphoma treatments in the middle-aged and the elderly. The lesions mimicked lymphoma relapse in PET scans. Therefore, recognizing CMV infection in lymphoid tissues is of clinical importance.

Graphic abstract

Association of Epstein-Barr virus with regression after withdrawal of immunosuppressive drugs and subsequent progression of iatrogenic immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorders in patients with autoimmune diseases

Patients with autoimmune diseases (AIDs) may develop lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs) during treatment with immunosuppressive agents (IS) such as methotrexate (MTX), biological agents, or tacrolimus. Some LPDs in patients with AIDs (AID-LPDs) regress after withdrawal of IS, and a high incidence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity in such patients has been reported. To identify characteristics and factors predictive of the response to treatment and disease progression, we retrospectively analyzed clinical and histopathological data for 81 patients with AID-LPDs. Almost all of them (96%) had been treated with MTX. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma was the most common LPD type (61%) and seven patients (9%) had classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL). EBV was detected by in situ hybridization with an EBV-encoded small RNA (EBER) probe in 43% of the examined cases. In 59 patients, IS was discontinued as the initial treatment, resulting in regression of LPDs in 69% of them, and multivariate analysis showed that EBER positivity was an independent factor predictive of such regression (p = 0.022). Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival for the patients overall were 63% and 83%, respectively. Poor PFS was associated with advanced stage (p = 0.024), worse performance status (PS, p = 0.031), CHL histology (p = 0.013), and reactivation of EBV-related antibodies (p = 0.029). In conclusion, EBV positivity demonstrated using an EBER probe is useful for prediction of successful regression after withdrawal of IS in patients with AID-LPDs. Patients with advanced stage disease, worse PS, CHL histology, or reactivation of EBV-related antibodies should be closely monitored after initial treatment.

Differences in Epstein-Barr Virus Characteristics and Viral-Related Microenvironment Could Be Responsible for Lymphomagenesis in Children

In Argentina, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) presence is associated with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in patients younger than 10 years, suggesting a relationship between low age of EBV infection and HL. Given that HL is derived from germinal centers (GC), our aim was to compare EBV protein expression and microenvironment markers between pediatric HL patients and EBV+GC in children. Methods: EBV presence and immune cell markers were assessed by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results: Viral latency II pattern was proved in all HL patients and in 81.8% of EBV+ tonsillar GCs. LMP1 and LMP2 co-expression were proved in 45.7% HL cases, but only in 7.7% EBV+ GC in pediatric tonsils. An increase in CD4+, IL10, and CD68+ cells was observed in EBV+ GC. In pediatric HL patients, only the mean of IL10+ cells was statistically higher in EBV+ HL. Conclusions: Our findings point us out to suggest that LMP1 expression may be sufficient to drive neoplastic transformation, that an immune regulatory milieu counteracts cytotoxic environment in EBV-associated Hodgkin lymphoma, and that CD4+ and CD68+ cells may be recruited to act in a local collaborative way to restrict, at least in part, viral-mediated lymphomagenesis in tonsillar GC.

EBV-miR-BART10-3p facilitates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and promotes metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by targeting BTRC

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is closely associated with tumorigenesis and development of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but the underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. It has been recently reported that EBV encodes 44 mature miRNAs, some of which were found to promote tumor development by targeting virus-infected host genes or self-viral genes. However, few targets of EBV encoded-miRNAs that are related to NPC development have been identified to date. In this study, we revealed that in NPC cells, EBV-miR-BART10-3p directly targets BTRC gene that encodes βTrCP (beta-transducin repeat containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase). We found that EBV-miR-BART10-3p expression in clinical samples from a cohort of 106 NPC patients negatively correlated with BTRC expression levels. Over-expression of EBV-miR-BART10-3p and down-regulation of BTRC were associated with poor prognosis in NPC patients. EBV-miR-BART10-3p promoted the invasion and migration cabilities of NPC cells through the targeting of BTRC and regulation of the expression of the downstream substrates β-catenin and Snail. As a result, EBV-miR-BART10-3p facilitated epithelial-mesenchymal transition of NPC. Our study presents an unreported mechanism underlying EBV infection in NPC carcinogenesis, and provides a potential novel biomarker for NPC diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.

The Epstein-Barr virus and the pathogenesis of lymphoma

Since the discovery in 1964 of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in African Burkitt lymphoma, this virus has been associated with a remarkably diverse range of cancer types. Because EBV persists in the B cells of the asymptomatic host, it can easily be envisaged how it contributes to the development of B-cell lymphomas. However, EBV is also found in other cancers, including T-cell/natural killer cell lymphomas and several epithelial malignancies. Explaining the aetiological role of EBV is challenging, partly because the virus probably contributes differently to each tumour and partly because the available disease models cannot adequately recapitulate the subtle variations in the virus-host balance that exist between the different EBV-associated cancers. A further challenge is to identify the co-factors involved; because most persistently infected individuals will never develop an EBV-associated cancer, the virus cannot be working alone. This article will review what is known about the contribution of EBV to lymphoma development.