Korean Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis

Comparison of different intervention thresholds for the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) is the most common drug-induced osteoporosis. Early detection and treatment may decrease the fragility fractures. Several GIO guidelines exist, although they vary in recommended intervention thresholds for initiating pharmacologic treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of intervention thresholds in treating GIO under various guidelines.

METHODS

Rheumatic disease patients receiving ≥ 2.5 mg/day prednisolone or equivalent for longer than 3 months between January 2013 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who were previously treated with anti-osteoporotic medications or had other secondary causes of osteoporosis were excluded. Bone mineral density (BMD) and Thailand-specific FRAX with glucocorticoid adjustment (GC-FRAX) were recorded. The performances of different intervention thresholds from six GIO guidelines (ACR 2022, Belgian 2022, TOPF 2021, Korean 2018, Malaysian 2015, and Japanese 2023) were examined against the incidence of actual fragility fractures.

RESULTS

This study included 226 rheumatic patients, with a mean (SD) age of 62.9 (10.1) years. Most of the patients were female (88.9%). The average (SD) daily dose, cumulative dose, and duration of glucocorticoid use were 4.6 (10.6) mg/day, 9,223.4 (9,223.4) mg, and 58.3 (55.8) months, respectively. Diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis (59.8%), systemic lupus erythematosus (22%), inflammatory myositis (4.7%), systemic sclerosis (4.7%), and others. The prevalence of major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures was 14.2% and 0.9%, respectively. The ten-year probabilities of major osteoporotic and hip fractures (FRAX) with and without BMD were 12.6 ± 9.1, 5.4 ± 6, 10.7 ± 7.2, and 4.6 ± 4.8, respectively. The mean (SD) ten-year FRAX probabilities of major osteoporotic and hip fractures were 12.6% (9.1) and 5.4% (6) with the inclusion of BMD result, and 10.7% (7.2) and 4.6% (4.8) without the inclusion of the BMD result. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the ACR 2022, Belgian 2022, TOPF 2021, Korean 2018, Malaysian 2015, and Japanese 2023 guidelines were 100%/ 3.1%/ 16.8%, 93.8%/ 14.4%/ 25.7%, 93.8%/ 43.8%/ 50.9%, 100%/ 17.5%/ 29.2%, 78.1%/ 62.9%/ 65% and 100%/ 24.2%/ 35%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Among evaluated guidelines, ACR 2022, Korean 2018, and Japan 2023 had the highest sensitivity for GIO treatment, while Malaysian 2015 showed the highest specificity and accuracy. These findings can improve clinical decision-making in GIO management for rheumatic disease patients.

Risk of Osteoporosis Associated with Glucocorticoid Use in Pemphigus Vulgaris: Insights from a Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is an autoimmune bullous disease affecting the skin and mucous membranes. Osteoporosis, a significant side effect of commonly used glucocorticoids in treatment, can adversely contribute to the existing morbidity.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the impact of glucocorticoid therapy on bone mineral density in patients with PV.

METHODS

Patients newly diagnosed with PV were included in this study. Femur and lumbar T-scores, serum calcium, vitamin D, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were analyzed before and one year after therapy.

RESULTS

Among 66 patients, the average time to diagnosis was 10.14 months, and the average daily dose of prednisone was 16.95 mg, with 63.6% of patients receiving medium doses. Our data showed no significant change in lumbar T-scores after one year of glucocorticoid treatment, but a significant decrease in femur density was observed. The decrease in femur T-scores was significant in the medium-dose group, while the lumbar T-scores decreased significantly in the high-dose group. There was no significant correlation between T-scores and sex, menopausal state, diagnosis time, or obesity. Additionally, vitamin D and LDH levels significantly increased after treatment, while changes in serum calcium and ALP levels were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Given the multiple factors that reduce bone mineral density in PV patients, the current strategies for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis prophylaxis in this group may need re-evaluation, with potential for additional recommendations to be included in pemphigus guidelines.

Ukrainian guideline for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) is a bone metabolic disorder caused by glucocorticoid (GC) use. It is one of the leading causes of secondary osteoporosis, increasing the risk of low-energy fractures, disability, and mortality. Although limited studies on GIOP epidemiology and treatment have been conducted in Ukraine, there were no national guidelines for its management. The aim was to create national guideline for the GIOP diagnosis, prevention, and treatment based on a comprehensive review of modern literature to enhance awareness within Ukraine's medical community, improve disease management, and reduce its socio-economic impact.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An Expert Group comprising 18 leading Ukrainian scientists from various fields was created for guideline development. A review of modern literature on GIOP epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and monitoring was conducted. Evidence synthesis followed the GRADE methodology, and the quality of recommendations was critically evaluated using the AGREE II tool.

RESULTS

The guideline comprises 12 statements covering GIOP screening, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. We highlight the need to raise awareness among healthcare providers and patients about the potential effects of GC therapy. Also, we outline approaches to clinical assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk in GC users and detail diagnostic and therapeutic methods currently available in Ukraine for managing GIOP.

CONCLUSION

The first Ukrainian national GIOP guideline is critical for healthcare providers across specialities. Endorsed by the Board of the Ukrainian Association of Osteoporosis, it is recommended for use in routine clinical practice to enhance patient outcomes and mitigate the disease's impact.

Osteoporosis in men-East and West: Can the twain meet? A perspective from Asia

Osteoporosis in men remains a significantly underrecognized condition, with notable differences in bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk between Asian and Western populations. Despite 30% of hip fractures globally occurring in men, they are less likely to be diagnosed or treated for osteoporosis, especially in resource-limited settings. Given these disparities, a deeper understanding of osteoporosis epidemiology and treatment efficacy in men is essential, particularly in Asian populations. This review synthesizes the latest evidence on the epidemiology, screening, and treatment of osteoporosis in men, with a focus on genetic, environmental, and epidemiological disparities between Eastern and Western populations. Additionally, the review examines existing controversies surrounding fracture risk screening in men and evaluates the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of pharmacological treatments such as bisphosphonates, denosumab, and anabolic agents. Asian men exhibit lower peak BMD compared to their Caucasian counterparts, leading to potential misdiagnoses when using Caucasian-based BMD reference ranges. Screening tools like the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)® show variability in performance across populations. Data on pharmacological treatment in men remain limited, although studies suggest comparable benefits to those observed in women. Larger studies, particularly in male and Asian populations, are urgently needed to refine diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines. Osteoporosis in men is underdiagnosed and undertreated globally, with pronounced disparities between populations. Current diagnostic tools and treatment protocols are not fully tailored to male and Asian populations. There is an urgent need for longitudinal studies focusing on male-specific osteoporosis management to reduce fracture risk and improve outcomes.

Low-dose glucocorticoid increase the risk of fracture in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a retrospective cohort study

Long-term glucocorticoids (GCs) treatment is associated with osteoporosis and fractures. We investigated whether low-dose GC treatment also increased the risk of osteoporotic fractures, and the results showed that even low-dose GC treatment increased the risk of osteoporotic fractures, especially spine fractures.

PURPOSE

The effect of low-dose glucocorticoid (GC) therapy on the fracture risk in postmenopausal women with low bone mass was investigated.

METHODS

119,790 66-year-old postmenopausal women with low bone mass based on bone mineral density (BMD) results were included. GC group consisted of patients who had been prescribed oral GCs within 6 months of BMD testing. In GC group, GCs dosage was calculated by a defined daily dose (DDD), and divided into five groups according to GC usage (Group 1[G1]; < 11.25 DDDs, G2; ≥ 11.25, < 22.5 DDDs, G3; ≥ 22.5, < 45 DDDs, G4; ≥ 45, < 90 DDDs, G5; ≥ 90 DDDs). The risk of major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) and non-MOF was analyzed and compared with that of the control group during the 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The risk of total fracture was higher in G3-G5 than in the control group (G3, hazard ratio (HR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.46; G4, 1.37 [1.13-1.66]; G5 1.45 [1.08-1.94]). The risk of MOF was higher in all groups except G2 than in the control group (G1, 1.23 [1.05-1.45]; G3, 1.37 [1.11-1.68]; G4, 1.41 [1.09-1.83]; G5, 1.66 [1.14-2.42]). The risk of spine fracture was significantly higher in all GC groups except G2 than in the control group. The risk of non-MOF was higher only in G4 than in the control group (G4, 1.48 [1.13-1.94]).

CONCLUSION

Low-dose GC therapy can increase the risk of osteoporotic fractures, particularly spine fractures, in postmenopausal women with low bone mass.

[Treatment of Autoimmune Hepatitis]

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease, characterized by elevated levels of transaminases, immunoglobulin G, and positive autoantibodies. The disease course is dynamic and presents heterogeneous disease manifestations at diagnosis. This review summarizes the issues regarding the treatment and monitoring of AIH in adult patients. Glucocorticoids and azathioprine are the first line of treatment. Alternative first-line treatments include budesonide or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Although no randomized controlled trials have been performed, MMF, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, 6-mercaptopurine, 6-thioguanine, allopurinol, sirolimus, everolimus, infliximab, or rituximab have been attempted in patients not responding to or intolerant to first-line treatments. Most patients require life-long special monitoring, with or without maintenance treatment.

Comparison of predictive value of FRAX, trabecular bone score, and bone mineral density for vertebral fractures in systemic sclerosis: A cross-sectional study

Assessing fracture risk is important for managing patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Vertebral fracture (VF) is the most common fracture and is associated with future VF and non-VF. We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of FRAX, trabecular bone score (TBS), and bone mineral density (BMD) for VFs, compared to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and postmenopausal women, and to identify risk factors for VFs in SSc. In this cross-sectional study, prevalent VFs, 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture by FRAX (FRAX-MOF), TBS, and BMD were assessed in women with SSc (n = 69) and RA (n = 58), and postmenopausal women (n = 38). Risk factors for osteoporosis, modified Rodnan total skin score (mRSS), organ involvement, and patterns of nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) were also evaluated. The accuracy of BMD (T-score ≤ -2.5), TBS and FRAX-MOF, with and without TBS adjustment, to detect prevalent VF was assessed by determining the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Patients with SSc (14.5%) and RA (17.2%) had significantly more VFs than postmenopausal women (0%) (P = .031). Non-significant differences were observed in TBS and BMD of all groups. The FRAX-MOF were higher in RA (9.2%) than SSc group (6.1%) and postmenopausal women (5.5%) (P < .001). Based on the ROC curve, TBS-adjusted FRAX-MOF (0.803) showed largest area under curve (AUC) to detect the prevalent VFs, followed by FRAX-MOF (0.796), TBS (0.765), and BMD (0.588) in the SSc group. In the RA group, FRAX-MOF had the largest AUC (0.896), followed by TBS-adjusted FRAX-MOF (0.863), TBS (0.736), and BMD (0.686). The cutoffs for FRAX-MOF and TBS-adjusted FRAX-MOF for detecting VFs were 8.95% and 9.7% for SSc, and 14.5% and 14% for RA. No association between VFs and SSc subtypes, organ involvement, mRSS or NFC patterns was found. FRAX-MOF, with or without TBS, had better predictive value for VFs than BMD and TBS in SSc. However, FRAX-MOF underestimated the probability of VFs in SSc compared with RA.

Evidence based Latin American Guidelines of clinical practice on prevention, diagnosis, management and treatment of glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis. A 2022 update : This manuscript has been produced under the auspices of the Committee of National Societies (CNS) and the Committee of Scientific Advisors (CSA) of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF)

Guidelines and recommendations developed and endorsed by the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) are intended to provide guidance for particular pattern of practice for physicians who usually prescribe glucocorticoid (GC) therapy, and not to dictate the care of a particular patient. Adherence to the recommendations within this guideline is voluntary and the ultimate determination regarding their application should be made by the physician in light of each patient's circumstances. Guidelines and recommendations are intended to promote a desirable outcome but cannot guarantee any specific outcome. This guideline and its recommendations are not intended to dictate payment, reimbursement or insurance decisions. Guidelines and recommendations are subjected to periodic revisions as a consequence of the evolution of medicine, technology and clinical practice. A panel of Latin American (LATAM) experts specialized in osteoporosis with recognized clinical experience in managing patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) met to produce evidence-based LATAM recommendations for the diagnosis and management of GIO. These guidelines are particularly intended to general practitioners and primary care physicians who prescribe GC treatments in LATAM to guide their daily clinical practice in terms of evaluation, prevention and treatment of GIO. These recommendations were based on systematic literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and COCHRANE Library database during the period from 2012 to 2021. Randomized clinical trials (RCT), systematic reviews of RCT, controlled observational studies, guidelines and consensus were considered. Based on the review and expert opinion the panel members voted recommendations during two successive rounds of voting by panel members. Agreements for each statement were considered if a concordance of at least 70% was achieved following Delphi methodology. Grading of recommendations was made according to the Oxford Centre for the Evidence-based Medicine (EBM) criteria. Among five GIO guidelines and consensus initially identified, two of them (American College of Rheumatology 2017 and the Brazilian Guidelines 2021) were selected for comparison considering the latter as the most current guides in the LATAM region. Based on this methodology fifty statements were issued. All of them but four (1.20, 1.21, 1.23 and 4.2) attained agreement.

Antiresorptive treatments for corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis (CIO) is the most common type of secondary osteoporosis, leading to fractures, and increased morbidity and mortality.

SOURCE OF DATA

Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar databases.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Prolonged glucocorticoids administration leads to secondary osteoporosis.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

The optimal management for CIO is controversial.

GROWING POINTS

The present study compared bone mineral density, fractures and adverse events in patients undergoing treatment with risedronate, alendronate, zoledronate, denosumab or etidronate for CIO.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

For selected patients with CIO, alendronate performed better overall. These results must be interpreted within the limitations of the present study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I, Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Fracture risk associated with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) is associated with elevated fracture risk. Practice guidelines have been published to reduce this risk but are insufficiently followed in everyday practice. The objectives of this study were to estimate fracture incidence in patients exposed to oral glucocorticoids and to analyse the impact of glucocorticoid use on fracture incidence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was performed using the Medical Data Vision (MDV) claims database from Japan. All patients aged ≥ 18 years initiating oral glucocorticoids and fulfilling Japanese guideline criteria for starting prophylactic osteoporosis treatment between 2009 and 2019 were identified. These were matched to a cohort of unexposed controls using propensity score matching. Fracture incidence in the two cohorts were compared using a Fine-Gray proportional sub-distribution hazard model.

RESULTS

13,090 glucocorticoid-exposed cases were compared to 13,090 unexposed controls. The 1-year fracture rate (all sites) was 9.3 [95% CI 8.8-9.8] in cases and 5.8 [5.4-6.2] in controls. One-year vertebral fracture rates were 4.3 [4.0-4.7] and 2.3 [2.1-2.6] respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the use of glucocorticoids was associated with an increase in the incidence of osteoporotic fractures (hazard ratio: 1.63 [1.51-1.76]). The glucocorticoid-associated risk tended to be higher in subgroups of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, COPD and in those aged < 65 years.

CONCLUSION

Oral glucocorticoid use is associated with an increase in fracture incidence. It is necessary to raise awareness of GIOP and to take public health measures to change the perceptions and behaviour of doctors prescribing glucocorticoids.

Clivus-involved immunoglobulin G4 related hypertrophic pachymeningitis mimicking meningioma: A case report

BACKGROUND

Immunoglobulin G4 related disease (IgG4-RD) is a fibroinflammatory disease with markedly elevated serum IgG4 levels and fibrous tissue proliferation, accompanied by numerous plasma cells. IgG4 related hypertrophic pachymeningitis (IgG4-RHP) is relatively rare and indistinguishable from other phymatoid diseases before the operation. The risk of long-term immunosuppression needs to be balanced with disease activity.

CASE SUMMARY

A 40-year-old man presented with headache and bilateral abducent paralysis. He was also diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis 10 years ago and was on regular treatment for the same. Before the operation and steroid therapy, the patient was suspected of having tubercular meningitis at a local hospital. A clivus lesion was found via brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at this presentation. He was preliminarily diagnosed with meningioma and underwent Gamma Knife Surgery. Transnasal endoscopic resection was performed to treat deterioration of nerve function. Postoperative pathologic examination suggested IgG4-RD. Moreover, the serum IgG4 was elevated at 1.90 g/L (reference range: 0.035-1.500 g/L). After steroid therapy for 2 mo, the lesion size diminished on MRI, and the function of bilateral abducent nerves recovered.

CONCLUSION

IgG4-RHP is relatively rare and indistinguishable before the operation. Elevated serum IgG4 levels and imaging examination help in the diagnosis of IgG4-RHP. Surgery is necessary when lesions progress and patients start to develop cranial nerve function deficit.

Guideline adherence by physicians for management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in Japan: a nationwide health insurance claims database study

Risk of fracture due to glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) can be reduced by anti-osteoporosis (OP) medications. The proportion of patients on long-term glucocorticoid therapy who received anti-OP medications according to the GIO management guidelines has increased in recent years, but is still suboptimal.

INTRODUCTION

Adherence of physicians to guidelines for glucocorticoid (GC)-induced osteoporosis (GIO) management is currently unclear. This study aimed to clarify the state of guideline adherence by physicians in Japan and identify factors associated with guideline adherence using a nationwide health insurance claims database (NDBJ).

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 50 years who were prescribed GC for ≥ 90 days after 180 days without a GC prescription and who were followed up for osteoporosis (OP) management for the subsequent 360 days during the period spanning 2012-2018 were selected from the NDBJ. Guideline adherence was evaluated with the proportion of patients who received OP management as recommended by the Japanese guidelines. Information on previous vertebral and hip fractures, dementia, and polypharmacy was obtained. Factors associated with OP management were evaluated by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 512,296 patients were considered to be at high risk of fracture according to the guidelines. Proportions of patients receiving OP management (BMD testing or anti-OP medications) have increased in recent years. In 2017, 33.7% of men and 55.3% of women received OP management in the initial 90 days of GC therapy. Female sex, previous anti-OP medications, polypharmacy, and higher GC dose were significantly associated with receiving OP management, while dementia showed an inverse association. A prior history of hip fracture, a strong risk factor for future fracture, was not significantly associated with receiving OP management.

CONCLUSIONS

Although guideline adherence by physicians has increased in recent years, it remains suboptimal. Further efforts to improve guideline adherence are necessary.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The present study is not registered.

Epidemiology of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and management of associated fracture risk in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) is associated with a high fracture risk. Practice guidelines by the Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research in 2014 recommend bone densitometry and appropriate treatment to reduce this risk. The study objectives were to describe characteristics of GIOP patients in Japan and to evaluate their management in a subgroup of patients without comorbid cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was performed using the Medical Data Vision (MDV) database from Japan. Adult patients initiating oral glucocorticoid treatment with a total GIOP risk score ≥ 3, based on the 2014 practice guideline, identified between 2009 and 2019 were eligible. A subgroup of patients without any cancer diagnosis was also identified. Data were extracted on demographics, concurrent medical conditions, use of bone densitometry, and osteoporosis treatment.

RESULTS

25,569 patients were eligible, of whom 12,227 had a confirmed cancer diagnosis. Mean age was 68.5 years and 12,356 patients (48.3%) were women. Concurrent medical conditions of interest were documented in 14,887 patients, most frequently rheumatoid arthritis (n = 4185) and asthma (n = 3085). Yearly bone densitometry was performed in 6.5% (n = 865) of the cancer-free subgroup; 51.8% (n = 6905) were prescribed an osteoporosis treatment, most frequently bisphosphonates (n = 5132; 74.3%). Between 2011 and 2018, rates of densitometry were stable, whereas prescription rates increased from 40.0 to 51.8%.

CONCLUSION

In spite of publication of guidelines for GIOP management, there is an important treatment gap in their application in everyday practice. For this reason, public health measures to increase physician awareness of GIOP are needed.

German Society of Rheumatology recommendations for management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoids are of substantial therapeutic importance in the treatment of inflammatory diseases, but are also associated with bone mineral density loss, osteoporosis, and fractures, especially with long-term use.

OBJECTIVE

To develop recommendations for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) in adult patients on long-term glucocorticoid (GC) treatment.

METHODS

A systematic literature search (SLR) was conducted to synthesize the evidence for GIOP prevention and treatment options. Recommendations were developed based on SLR/level of evidence and by previously defined questions and in a structured group consensus process.

RESULTS

Recommendations include supplementation with calcium and vitamin D under long-term GC therapy in adults. If specific osteologic treatment is indicated, we recommend bisphosphonates or denosumab as first-line treatment. If fracture risk is high, we recommend teriparatide as primary specific osteologic treatment. Denosumab should be used in cases of severe renal insufficiency, and specific osteologic treatment should not be given in pregnancy. For patients who have not reached the treatment goal, a switch to another class of specific osteologic drugs should be performed. We recommend re-evaluation after a treatment duration of 3-5 years or after termination of long-term GC treatment.

CONCLUSION

This work aims to provide evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for the best possible management of GIOP in Germany and to support treatment decisions.

Fracture Risk and Its Prevention Patterns in Korean Patients with Polymyalgia Rheumatica: a Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the incidence of fractures and fracture risk factors in Korean patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).

METHODS

All PMR patients who visited a rheumatology clinic at a tertiary referral hospital between March 2005 and March 2018 were retrospectively assessed. We estimated bone mineral density (BMD) screening rate within 6 months of the first visit and classified the patients according to the performance and results of BMD screening. Incidence rates (IRs) of fractures were calculated in each group and risk factors for fractures were identified using Poisson regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 95 PMR patients with median (interquartile range) age of 64.0 (56.0-72.0) years were included. Baseline BMD was assessed in only 55.8% of these patients (n = 53); 24 patients with osteoporosis, 20 with osteopenia, and 9 with normal BMD. During 433.1 person-years (PYs) of observation, 17 fractures occurred in 12 patients (IR, 3.93 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.46-6.26]/100 PYs); 8.32 (95% CI, 4.09-16.90)/100 PYs in the osteopenia group, 3.40 (95% CI, 1.30-8.90)/100 PYs in the osteoporosis group, and 3.37 (95% CI, 1.53-7.39)/100 PYs in the no BMD test group. Risk factors for fractures were female sex, advanced age (≥ 65 years), longer follow-up duration, initial glucocorticoid dose ≥ 10 mg/day, and higher cumulative glucocorticoid dose over the first 6 months.

CONCLUSION

The incidence rate of fractures in Korean patients with PMR was 3.93/100 PYs. Female sex, advanced age, longer follow-up duration, and increased glucocorticoid dose are risk factors for osteoporotic fracture.

Fragility of results from randomized controlled trials supporting the guidelines for the treatment of osteoporosis: a retrospective analysis

This is the first report on the fragility of results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the treatment of osteoporosis. The results of aforementioned RCTs appear to depend on a small number of events and are generally statistically fragile.

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis remains a health concern worldwide. Evidence-based guideline recommendations that are mainly based on results of clinical trials are important to clinical decision-making. The fragility index (FI) is a novel statistical metric to measure the fragility of results from an RCT. Our study aimed to analyze the fragility of the clinical trials referenced in the guidelines for the treatment of osteoporosis.

METHODS

Trials were included if they investigated primary osteoporosis, randomized patients to treatment or control in a 1:1 design, and reported fracture outcome as the primary endpoint. The FI and fragility quotient (FQ) were calculated for assessing the robustness of results from the eligible RCTs. An FI was defined as the minimum number of events in the intervention group that needs to change from a non-event to an event in order to render a significant result non-significant (or vice versa). The FQ was calculated by dividing the FI by the sample size of the trial.

RESULTS

Of the 372 RCTs identified from the guidelines, 42 were eligible for analyses. Their median FI was 10 (25th-75th percentile [Q1-Q3]: 4-18), with a median FQ of 0.007 (Q1-Q3: 0.0017-0.019). Approximately one third of the RCTs had a FI of less than or equal to 5. There were 17 (40.5%) trials where the number of patients lost to follow-up was greater than the FI. The FI was significantly associated with sample size, journal impact factor, and the percent of patients lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Results from some RCTs supporting guideline recommendations for the treatment of osteoporosis depend on a small number of events. The FI and FQ may provide additional, intuitive metrics to help interpret the robustness of trial results.

[German Society of Rheumatology Recommendations for the management of glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis. German version]

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoids are of substantial therapeutic importance in the treatment of inflammatory diseases, but are also associated with bone mineral density loss, osteoporosis, and fractures, especially with long-term use.

OBJECTIVE

To develop recommendations for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) in adult patients on long-term glucocorticoid (GC) treatment.

METHODS

A systematic literature search (SLR) was conducted to synthesize the evidence for GIOP prevention and treatment options. Recommendations were developed based on SLR/level of evidence and by previously defined questions and in a structured group consensus process.

RESULTS

Recommendations include supplementation with calcium and vitamin D under long-term GC therapy in adults. If specific osteologic treatment is indicated, we recommend bisphosphonates or denosumab as first-line treatment. If fracture risk is high, we recommend teriparatide as primary specific osteologic treatment. Denosumab should be used in cases of severe renal insufficiency, and specific osteologic treatment should not be given in pregnancy. For patients who have not reached the treatment goal, a switch to another class of specific osteologic drugs should be performed. We recommend re-evaluation after a treatment duration of 3-5 years or after termination of long-term GC treatment.

CONCLUSION

This work aims to provide evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for the best possible management of GIOP in Germany and to support treatment decisions.

Discriminative ability of trabecular bone score over bone mineral density for vertebral and fragility fracture in patients treated with long-term and low-dose glucocorticoid

AIM

To evaluate the ability of the trabecular bone score (TBS) to discriminate vertebral fracture (VF) and fragility fracture (FF) in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases on long-term and low-dose glucocorticoid (GC) treatment and those without exposure to GC.

METHODS

This study assessed TBS and bone mineral density (BMD) in chronic GC users, defined as ≥2.5 mg/d of prednisone for >3 months (n = 89, mean age: 62.5 ± 11 years), and in controls (n = 59, mean age: 60.3 ± 9.6 years). Osteoporosis risk factors, radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine, non-VF history, osteoporosis drugs, and current/cumulative GC doses were collected. Patients were classified as high (TBS <1.23), intermediate (1.23-1.31), or low risk (>1.31), according to the fracture risk based on a recent meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The mean current dose and duration of GC treatment were 3.9 ± 1.9 mg/d and 3.9 ± 4.2 years, respectively. The prevalence of VF was significantly higher in chronic GC users than in controls (20.2% vs 5.1%, P = .010), although the prevalence of non-VF was similar (11.2% vs 5.1%). The GC group had significantly lower L1-L4 TBS and femur total BMD than did the controls (all with P < .01) without significantly different lumbar BMD. TBS (<1.31) showed a higher sensitivity for patients with VF and FF (83.3% and 81.8%, respectively) than with densitometric osteoporosis in the GC group (61.1% and 59.1%, respectively). Using the receiver operating characteristic curve, TBS <1.31 showed better diagnostic accuracy than TBS <1.23 and BMD in chronic GC users.

CONCLUSION

TBS is more sensitive than BMD in detecting VF and FF in chronic GC users, even at a lower dose.

Update on Glucocorticoid Induced Osteoporosis

Glucocorticoids are used to treat many autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. However, an adverse systemic effect is a deleterious effect on bone, which may lead to glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, characterized by a rapid and transient increase in bone resorption and fracture risk, which may increase rapidly within 3 months of commencing oral glucocorticoids. Therefore, early risk assessment and intervention are crucial for preventing fractures in patients receiving glucocorticoids. Recent practice guidelines recommend an assessment for fracture risk in patients beginning or receiving glucocorticoids for more than 3 months, and they have suggested fracture risk assessment tool values for identifying patients who need preventive treatment. Bisphosphonates are currently the recommended first-line therapy for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. These have been shown to increase the bone mineral density in the spine and hip and to decrease the incidence of vertebral fractures. Recently, a more potent antiresorptive agent, denosumab, has been shown to increase the bone density in patients receiving glucocorticoids. Teriparatide has been shown to have a preventive effect on vertebral fractures, but not on nonvertebral fractures. In this article we aimed to provide an update on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis by focusing on the assessment of its risk and treatment options.

Osteoporosis case ascertainment strategies in European and Asian countries: a comparative review

While many clinical guidelines recommend screening for osteoporosis for early detection and treatment, there is great diversity in the case-finding strategies globally. We sought to compare case-finding strategies, focusing on the approaches used in European and Asian countries. This article provides an overview of the current case-finding strategies in the UK, Germany (including Austria and German-speaking regions of Switzerland), China, Japan, and Korea. We conducted a review of current treatment guidelines in each country and included expert opinions from key opinion leaders. Most countries define osteoporosis among patients with a radiographically identified fracture of the hip or the vertebrae. However, for other types of fractures, or in the absence of a fracture, varying combinations of risk-factor assessment and areal bone mineral density (aBMD) assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry are used to define osteoporosis cases. A T-score ≤ - 2.5 is accepted to identify osteoporosis in the absence of a fracture; however, not all countries accept DXA alone as the sole criteria. Additionally, the critera for requiring clinical risk factors in addition to aBMD differ across countries. In most Asian countries, aBMD scanning is only provided beyond a particular age threshold. However, all guidelines recommend fracture risk assessment in younger ages if risk factors are present. Our review identified that strategies for case-finding differ regionally, particularly among patients without a fracture. More homogenized ways of identifying osteoporosis cases are needed, in both the Eastern and the Western countries, to improve osteoporosis case-finding before a fracture occurs.Case-finding in osteoporosis is essential to initiate treatment and minimize fracture risk. We identified differences in case-finding strategies between Eastern and Western countries. In the absence of a diagnosed fracture, varying combinations of risk factors and bone density measurements are used. Standardized case-finding strategies may help improve treatment rates.

Quality assessment of traditional and conventional medicine clinical practice guidelines for osteoporosis

ABSTRACT

Numerous studies have reported the variable quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) across various domains. The aim of this study was to systematically assess the quality, methodology, and consistency of recently developed traditional and conventional medicine CPGs that focus on the management of osteoporosis and provide helpful recommendations for patients with osteoporosis.From June 2020 to July 2020, CPGs with osteoporosis targeting any age were systematically retrieved. All CPGs of traditional and conventional medicine related to the assessment and diagnosis, management, and clinical therapeutic and pharmacological recommendations with osteoporosis were eligible for inclusion in this study. The excluded documents included guidelines without recommendations, secondary publications derived from CPGs, consensus statements, or consensus conferences based on the opinion of panelists, systematic reviews, editorials, clinical trials, and single-author documents. The quality of CPGs was independently examined by three assessors using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. AGREE II consists of 6 domains; scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity of presentation, applicability, and editorial independence. Consequently, selected CPGs were graded as recommended (A), recommended with modifications (B), or not recommended (C), and the specific treatments and preventive recommendations in the CPGs were summarized.The quality of the 15 CPGs assessed varied across the AGREE II domains. The overall quality ranged from 3.0 to 6.0 out of 7. The domain that had the highest scores were "clarity of presentation," with a mean value of 69.0% (range 46%-83%); "editorial independence" had the lowest score of 30.2% (range 0%-75%). The conventional CPGs focused on pharmacological treatments, calcium and vitamin D intake, and prevention, while the traditional CPGs consistently emphasized on herbal medicine and non-pharmaceutical treatment and management.Further development of CPGs will require improvement in domains where low item scores have been obtained in the quality assessment in this present study. Further research is needed on alternative modalities for osteoporosis, especially complementary approaches, and higher quality CPGs are needed to facilitate evidence-based clinical practice.

Therapies for Preventing Bone Loss with Glucocorticoid Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We aim to critically review recent recommendations regarding preventative strategies for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and provide a summary of key evidence regarding available interventions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lifestyle optimization remains the hallmark of bone health preservation. Early initiation of anti-osteoporotic agents in the setting of glucocorticoid exposure is essential, guided by appropriate risk stratification. Recommendations for calcium and vitamin D intake optimization are well-supported across all risk strata. Bisphosphonates are the mainstay of pharmacological therapy. Newer agents such as denosumab and teriparatide have demonstrated comparative benefit in terms of incident fracture risk reduction and bone mineral density preservation, with comparable adverse events. With due consideration to cost, resource availability, and patient values and preferences, these agents may warrant use as the first-line agents in this setting. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis remains preventable and warrants early and targeted evidence-based therapy.

Intervention Thresholds for Treatment in Patients with Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis: Systematic Review of Guidelines

Background

In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the treatment indication for patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) in various clinical practice guidelines.

Methods

We searched for potentially relevant studies conducted from January 2000 to March 2020 using online databases, including PubMed, Ovid-EMBASE, Guidelines International Network, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, KoreaMed, KMbase, and KoMGI. We reviewed and analyzed the guidelines that included recommendations on GIOP and fulfilled the inclusion criteria.

Results

A total of 94 articles were selected based on review of the title and abstract; 14 guidelines were assessed upon reviewing the full text. The bone mineral density score for therapeutic intervention of GIOP in postmenopausal women was presented in 7 guidelines, among which 3 guidelines set a T-score of −2.5 or lower and the other 4 guidelines proposed a less stringent cut-off point of −1.5 or lower. Among the 10 guidelines published since 2012 after the emergence of the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX), 6 guidelines included FRAX in their criteria for defining intervention thresholds. However, they were further divided into fixed-probability (n=3) and age-dependent (n=3) thresholds based on the country.

Conclusions

Recently developed guidelines use FRAX as the criterion for establishing the treatment of patients with GIOP. However, these intervention thresholds need to be adapted for each country.

Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Bone Mineral Density in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Osteoporosis

Objectives: To assess the effect of vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density (BMD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with osteoporosis and determine whether supplementation of more than 800 IU/day, which is the currently recommended dose, is beneficial.

Methods: RA patients with osteoporosis who received bisphosphonate were included. Patients were classified into four groups according to the dose of vitamin D supplementation (0, 400, 800, and ≥1,000 IU/day). Multivariable linear regression models were performed to evaluate the effect of each dose of vitamin D supplementation on 1-year% change of BMD.

Results: In total, 187 RA patients with osteoporosis were included. In the multivariate model adjusted for potential confounders, patients receiving vitamin D supplementation had a significantly higher increase in 1-year % change in lumbar spine BMD (400 IU/day: β = 2.51 [95% CI: 0.04–4.99], 800 IU/day: β = 2.90 [95% CI: 0.47–5.33], and ≥1,000 IU/day: β = 6.01 [95% CI: 3.71–8.32]) and femoral neck BMD (400 IU/day: β = 3.88 [95% CI: 1.83–5.94], 800 IU/day: β =4.30 [95% CI: 2.25–6.35], and ≥1,000 IU/day: β = 6.79 [95% CI: 4.87–8.71]) than those not receiving the supplementation. Notably, the ≥1,000-IU/day group had a significantly higher increase in 1-year % change in lumbar spine BMD (β = 3.11 [95% CI: 0.86–5.37]) and femoral neck BMD (β = 2.50 [95% CI: 0.63–4.36]) than the 800-IU/day group.

Conclusion: In RA patients with osteoporosis receiving bisphosphonates, vitamin D supplementation was associated with a higher increase in BMD. This effect was higher in the vitamin D supplementation dose of ≥1,000 IU/day than in 800 IU/day.

Physicians' Attitudes on Management of Osteopenia in South Korea

Background

Osteopenia patients have a risk of fracture and may develop osteoporosis. We investigated physicians’ management of osteopenia patients in South Korea.

Methods

A survey was conducted using a questionnaire including 6 items: (1) do you think anti-osteoporosis medications are necessary in osteopenia patients?; (2) what is your preference to manage osteopenia patients, except for anti-osteoporosis medications?; (3) what is your indication for the anti-osteoporosis medication in osteopenia patients?; (4) what kind of anti-osteoporosis medication do you prefer to treat osteopenia patients?; (5) do you use bisphosphonates?; and (6) if not, what is the reason for not using?.

Results

Among the 173 participants, 150 (86.7%) replied that anti-osteoporosis medications were necessary in osteopenia patients. Indications for the medication were (1) past medical history of pathologic fracture in 85 (49.1%); (2) T-score <-2.5 on dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in 73 (42.2%); (3) previous history of osteoporosis in 44 (25.4%); (4) risk of fracture according to fracture risk assessment tool in 34 (19.7%); and (5) progressive bone loss in 31 (17.9%). One hundred and sixteen (67.1%) favored bisphosphonates, 93 (53.8%) selective estrogen-receptor modulator, and 24 (13.9%) hormone replacement therapy. Thirty-one (17.9%) replied that they do not use bisphosphonates due to (1) restricted reimbursement by the health insurance in 24 (77.4%); and (2) bisphosphonate-related complications in 19 (61.3%).

Conclusions

Most respondents (86.7%) thought anti-osteoporosis medications were necessary in osteopenia patients, but 17.9% of the respondents did not use bisphosphonates. Restricted reimbursement by the national health insurance was the major obstacle against the use of bisphosphonates.

Pathogenesis of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and options for treatment

Glucocorticoids are widely used to suppress inflammation or the immune system. High doses and long-term use of glucocorticoids lead to an important and common iatrogenic complication, glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, in a substantial proportion of patients. Glucocorticoids mainly increase bone resorption during the initial phase (the first year of treatment) by enhancing the differentiation and maturation of osteoclasts. Glucocorticoids also inhibit osteoblastogenesis and promote apoptosis of osteoblasts and osteocytes, resulting in decreased bone formation during long-term use. Several indirect effects of glucocorticoids on bone metabolism, such as suppression of production of insulin-like growth factor 1 or growth hormone, are involved in the pathogenesis of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Fracture risk assessment for all patients with long-term use of oral glucocorticoids is required. Non-pharmacological interventions to manage the risk of fracture should be prescribed to all patients, while pharmacological management is reserved for patients who have increased fracture risk. Various treatment options can be used, ranging from bisphosphonates to denosumab, as well as teriparatide. Finally, appropriate monitoring during treatment is also important.

Bone Mineral Density in Diabetes Mellitus Foot Patients for Prediction of Diabetic Neuropathic Osteoarthropathic Fracture

BACKGROUND

Diabetic neuropathic osteoarthropathy (DNOAP) is known as debilitating diabetes complications. The aim of study is to compare bone mineral density (BMD) among diabetic foot and DNOAP, and investigate the impact of BMD proceeded from diabetic foot to DNOAP.

METHODS

A DNOAP group (subgroup A and subgroup B) and control group were examined for this study. Subgroup A (n=21) were patients diagnosed with DNOAP with the development of new foot and ankle fractures, whereas subgroup B (n=4) were patients being managed with the diabetic foot before a diagnosis of DNOAP. BMD was also evaluated before the diagnosis. Control group (n=30) was diabetic foot patients without DNOAP. The demographic data, clinical and radiologic data, comorbidities, and BMD were compared for each group. And optimal BMD score was reviewed to predict fractures in neuropathic arthropathy.

RESULTS

BMD was significantly lower in DNOAP group (group A and B) compared with control group. Also neuropathic arthropathy group showed poor radiological results. After comparisons of 2 group lumbar and femur BMD was significantly different, but logistic regression analysis revealed that low femur T-score could be risk predictors of the condition. Base on the data of group B and control group, the cut-off point for predicting foot and ankle fracture-related with DNOAP was -1.65 of femur BMD.

CONCLUSIONS

Low BMD shows greater incidence in foot and ankle fracture patients associated with neuropathic arthropathy. A femur T score can be a risk predictor of diabetic neuropathic arthropathy for diabetic foot patients.

Vitamin D supplementation does not prevent the recurrence of Graves' disease

Recent literature has reported a higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among people with Graves’ disease. No study has examined the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the clinical outcomes of Graves’ disease. We aimed to evaluate whether daily vitamin D supplementation reduces Graves’ disease recurrence. We enrolled 210 subjects with Graves’ disease and vitamin D deficiency and followed them for at least one year after anti-thyroid drug (ATD) discontinuation. Among 210 individuals, 60 (29%) were amenable to taking vitamin D supplements, resulting in sufficient vitamin D levels (from 10.6 to 25.7 ng/mL), whereas the mean vitamin D level was 11.6 ng/mL in the 150 patients who did not take vitamin D supplements. The recurrence rate was similar in both groups (38% vs. 49%, P = 0.086). However, recurrence occurred earlier in the latter group (7 months vs. 5 months, P = 0.016). In the multivariate analysis, vitamin D levels and TSH-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin (TBII) titers at ATD discontinuation remained significant factors for recurrence. Vitamin D levels and TBII titers at ATD discontinuation exhibited a weak negative correlation (R = −0.143, P = 0.041). Vitamin D supplementation might have a protective effect against Graves’ disease recurrence with a borderline significant recurrence rate reduction.

Treatment of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis with Bisphosphonates Alone, Vitamin D Alone or a Combination Treatment in Eastern Asians: A Meta-Analysis

Background:

Glucocorticoid (GC)-induced osteoporosis and fractures have become a serious problem for Eastern Asians. Bisphosphonates (BPs), vitamin D and a combination treatment are effective methods to prevent and treat GC-induced osteoporosis.

Objective:

The study aimed to compare the efficacy of BPs, vitamin D and a combination treatment for preventing and managing GC-induced osteoporosis in Eastern Asians.

Methods:

A comprehensive search in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL databases was undertaken for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of BPs, vitamin D and the combination treatment on GCs-induced osteoporosis in Eastern Asian populations. Primary outcome measures were the change in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers. The final search was performed in March 2019.

Results:

Nine RCTs were included. A total of 545 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with vitamin D, BPs and the combination treatment significantly alleviated osteoporosis of the spine and femoral neck in Eastern Asians with GC-induced osteoporosis. At the same time, the change in serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) levels was observed to be significantly less with BPs and the combination treatment with vitamin D alone. No significant difference was found between BPs and the combination treatment in the markers mentioned above.

Conclusion:

Compared with vitamin D alone, BPs alone and the combination treatment were significantly effective on Eastern Asians with GC-induced osteoporosis. Compared with the combination treatment, BPs alone were observed to be effective enough to increase the BMDs of the spine and femoral neck on both sides and thus prevent GC-induced osteoporosis in Eastern Asians.

Evaluation of the effect of CaD on the bone structure and bone metabolic changes in senile osteoporosis rats based on MLP–ANN methods

Senile osteoporosis (SOP) is a related disease of systematic degenerative changes in bones during natural aging.