PUB-NChIP--"in vivo biotinylation" approach to study chromatin in proximity to a protein of interest

Detection of Recombinant Proteins SOX2 and OCT4 Interacting in HEK293T Cells Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR

In vivo biotinylation using wild-type and mutants of biotin ligases is now widely applied for the study of cellular proteomes. The commercial availability of kits for the highly efficient purification of biotinylated proteins and their excellent compatibility with LC-MS/MS protocols are the main reasons for the choice of biotin ligases. Since they are all enzymes, however, just a very low expression in cells is required for experiments. Therefore, it can be difficult to perform the quantifications of these enzymes in various samples. Traditional methods, such as western blotting, are not always fit for the detection of the expression levels. Therefore, real-time qRT-PCR, a technology that is more sensitive, was used in this study to quantify the expression of BirA fusions. Using this method, we detected high expression levels of BirA fusions in models of interactions of pluripotency transcription factors to carry out their relative quantification. We also found the absence of the competing endogenous proteins SOX2 and OCT4, as well as no cross-reactivity between BAP/BirA and the endogenous biotinylation system in HEK293T cells. Thus, these data indicated that the high level of biotinylation is due to the in vivo interaction of BAP-X and BirA-Y (X,Y = SOX2, OCT4) in the cell rather than their random collision, a big difference in the expression level of BirA fusions across samples or endogenous biotinylation.

Generation of Peptides for Highly Efficient Proximity Utilizing Site-Specific Biotinylation in Cells

Protein tags are peptide sequences genetically embedded into a recombinant protein for various purposes, such as affinity purification, Western blotting, and immunofluorescence. Another recent application of peptide tags is in vivo labeling and analysis of protein–protein interactions (PPI) by proteomics methods. One of the common workflows involves site-specific in vivo biotinylation of an AviTag-fused protein in the presence of the biotin ligase BirA. However, due to the rapid kinetics of labeling, this tag is not ideal for analysis of PPI. Here we describe the rationale, design, and protocol for the new biotin acceptor peptides BAP1070 and BAP1108 using modular assembling of biotin acceptor fragments, DNA sequencing, transient expression of proteins in cells, and Western blotting methods. These tags were used in the Proximity Utilizing Biotinylation (PUB) method, which is based on coexpression of BAP-X and BirA-Y in mammalian cells, where X or Y are candidate interacting proteins of interest. By changing the sequence of these peptides, a low level of background biotinylation is achieved, which occurs due to random collisions of proteins in cells. Over 100 plasmid constructs, containing genes of transcription factors, histones, gene repressors, and other nuclear proteins were obtained during implementation of projects related to this method.

Proximity labeling for investigating protein-protein interactions

The study of protein complexes and protein-protein interactions is of great importance due to their fundamental roles in cellular function. Proximity labeling, often coupled with mass spectrometry, has become a powerful and versatile tool for studying protein-protein interactions by enriching and identifying proteins in the vicinity of a specified protein-of-interest. Here, we describe and compare traditional approaches to investigate protein-protein interactions to current day state-of-the-art proximity labeling methods. We focus on the wide array of proximity labeling strategies and underscore studies using diverse model systems to address numerous biological questions. In addition, we highlight current advances in mass spectrometry-based technology that exhibit promise in improving the depth and breadth of the data acquired in proximity labeling experiments. In all, we show the diversity of proximity labeling strategies and emphasize the broad range of applications and biological inquiries that can be addressed using this technology.

Chromatin Proteomics to Study Epigenetics - Challenges and Opportunities

Regulation of gene expression is essential for the functioning of all eukaryotic organisms. Understanding gene expression regulation requires determining which proteins interact with regulatory elements in chromatin. MS-based analysis of chromatin has emerged as a powerful tool to identify proteins associated with gene regulation, as it allows studying protein function and protein complex formation in their in vivo chromatin-bound context. Total chromatin isolated from cells can be directly analyzed using MS or further fractionated into transcriptionally active and inactive chromatin prior to MS-based analysis. Newly formed chromatin that is assembled during DNA replication can also be specifically isolated and analyzed. Furthermore, capturing specific chromatin domains facilitates the identification of previously unknown transcription factors interacting with these domains. Finally, in recent years, advances have been made toward identifying proteins that interact with a single genomic locus of interest. In this review, we highlight the power of chromatin proteomics approaches and how these provide complementary alternatives compared with conventional affinity purification methods. Furthermore, we discuss the biochemical challenges that should be addressed to consolidate and expand the role of chromatin proteomics as a key technology in the context of gene expression regulation and epigenetics research in health and disease.

•

An overview of proteomics methods to study chromatin and gene regulation.

•

Strength and limitations of the different approaches are highlighted.

•

An outlook on the outstanding challenges for chromatin proteomics.

•

Future directions for chromatin proteomics are discussed.

Advances and Opportunities in Epigenetic Chemical Biology

The study of epigenetics has greatly benefited from the development and application of various chemical biology approaches. In this review, we highlight the key targets for modulation and recent methods developed to enact such modulation. We discuss various chemical biology techniques to study DNA methylation and the post-translational modification of histones as well as their effect on gene expression. Additionally, we address the wealth of protein synthesis approaches to yield histones and nucleosomes bearing epigenetic modifications. Throughout, we highlight targets that present opportunities for the chemical biology community, as well as exciting new approaches that will provide additional insight into the roles of epigenetic marks.

Active and Repressed Chromatin Domains Exhibit Distinct Nucleosome Segregation during DNA Replication

Chromatin domains and their associated structures must be faithfully inherited through cellular division to maintain cellular identity. However, accessing the localized strategies preserving chromatin domain inheritance, specifically the transfer of parental, pre-existing nucleosomes with their associated post-translational modifications (PTMs) during DNA replication, is challenging in living cells. We devised an inducible, proximity-dependent labeling system to irreversibly mark replication-dependent H3.1 and H3.2 histone-containing nucleosomes at desired loci in mouse embryonic stem cells so that their fate after DNA replication could be followed. Strikingly, repressed chromatin domains are preserved through local re-deposition of parental nucleosomes. In contrast, nucleosomes decorating active chromatin domains do not exhibit such preservation. Notably, altering cell fate leads to an adjustment of the positional inheritance of parental nucleosomes that reflects the corresponding changes in chromatin structure. These findings point to important mechanisms that contribute to parental nucleosome segregation to preserve cellular identity.

Proximity Labeling Techniques to Study Chromatin

Mammals contain over 200 different cell types, yet nearly all have the same genomic DNA sequence. It is a key question in biology how the genetic instructions in DNA are selectively interpreted by cells to specify various transcriptional programs and therefore cellular identity. The structural and functional organization of chromatin governs the transcriptional state of individual genes. To understand how genomic loci adopt different levels of gene expression, it is critical to characterize all local chromatin factors as well as long-range interactions in the 3D nuclear compartment. Much of our current knowledge regarding protein interactions in a chromatin context is based on affinity purification of chromatin components coupled to mass spectrometry (AP-MS). AP-MS has been invaluable to map strong protein-protein interactions in the nucleus. However, the interaction is detected after cell lysis and biochemical enrichment, allowing for loss or gain of false positive or negative interaction partners. Recently, proximity-dependent labeling methods have emerged as powerful tools for studying chromatin in its native context. These methods take advantage of engineered enzymes that are fused to a chromatin factor of interest and can directly label all factors in proximity. Subsequent pull-down assays followed by mass spectrometry or sequencing approaches provide a comprehensive snapshot of the proximal chromatin interactome. By combining this method with dCas9, this approach can also be extended to study chromatin at specific genomic loci. Here, we review and compare current proximity-labeling approaches available for studying chromatin, with a particular focus on new emerging technologies that can provide important insights into the transcriptional and chromatin interaction networks essential for cellular identity.

In Vivo Quantitative Estimation of DNA-Dependent Interaction of Sox2 and Oct4 Using BirA-Catalyzed Site-Specific Biotinylation

Protein–protein interactions of core pluripotency transcription factors play an important role during cell reprogramming. Cell identity is controlled by a trio of transcription factors: Sox2, Oct4, and Nanog. Thus, methods that help to quantify protein–protein interactions may be useful for understanding the mechanisms of pluripotency at the molecular level. Here, a detailed protocol for the detection and quantitative analysis of in vivo protein–protein proximity of Sox2 and Oct4 using the proximity-utilizing biotinylation (PUB) method is described. The method is based on the coexpression of two proteins of interest fused to a biotin acceptor peptide (BAP)in one case and a biotin ligase enzyme (BirA) in the other. The proximity between the two proteins leads to more efficient biotinylation of the BAP, which can be either detected by Western blotting or quantified using proteomics approaches, such as a multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) analysis. Coexpression of the fusion proteins BAP-X and BirA-Y revealed strong biotinylation of the target proteins when X and Y were, alternatively, the pluripotency transcription factors Sox2 and Oct4, compared with the negative control where X or Y was green fluorescent protein (GFP), which strongly suggests that Sox2 and Oct4 come in close proximity to each other and interact.

Topokaryotyping demonstrates single cell variability and stress dependent variations in nuclear envelope associated domains

Analysis of large-scale interphase genome positioning with reference to a nuclear landmark has recently been studied using sequencing-based single cell approaches. However, these approaches are dependent upon technically challenging, time consuming and costly high throughput sequencing technologies, requiring specialized bioinformatics tools and expertise. Here, we propose a novel, affordable and robust microscopy-based single cell approach, termed Topokaryotyping, to analyze and reconstruct the interphase positioning of genomic loci relative to a given nuclear landmark, detectable as banding pattern on mitotic chromosomes. This is accomplished by proximity-dependent histone labeling, where biotin ligase BirA fused to nuclear envelope marker Emerin was coexpressed together with Biotin Acceptor Peptide (BAP)-histone fusion followed by (i) biotin labeling, (ii) generation of mitotic spreads, (iii) detection of the biotin label on mitotic chromosomes and (iv) their identification by karyotyping. Using Topokaryotyping, we identified both cooperativity and stochasticity in the positioning of emerin-associated chromatin domains in individual cells. Furthermore, the chromosome-banding pattern showed dynamic changes in emerin-associated domains upon physical and radiological stress. In summary, Topokaryotyping is a sensitive and reliable technique to quantitatively analyze spatial positioning of genomic regions interacting with a given nuclear landmark at the single cell level in various experimental conditions.

Localized protein biotinylation at DNA damage sites identifies ZPET, a repressor of homologous recombination

Here, Moquin et al. show that fusion of the promiscuous biotin ligase BirA^R118G with RAD18 leads to localized protein biotinylation at DNA damage sites and identify ZPET/ZNF280C as a potential DNA damage response protein. Their findings show that ZPET is an HR repressor and also suggest that localized protein biotinylation at DNA damage sites is a useful strategy to identify DDR proteins.

Numerous DNA repair and signaling proteins function at DNA damage sites to protect the genome. Here, we show that fusion of the promiscuous biotin ligase BirA^R118G with RAD18 leads to localized protein biotinylation at DNA damage sites, allowing identification of ZPET (zinc finger protein proximal to RAD eighteen)/ZNF280C as a potential DNA damage response (DDR) protein. ZPET binds ssDNA and localizes to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and stalled replication forks. In vitro, ZPET inhibits MRE11 binding to ssDNA. In cells, ZPET delays MRE11 binding to chromatin after DSB formation and slows DNA end resection through binding ssDNA. ZPET hinders resection independently of 53BP1 and HELB. Cells lacking ZPET displayed enhanced homologous recombination (HR), accelerated replication forks under stress, and increased resistance to DSBs and PARP inhibition. These results not only reveal ZPET as an HR repressor but also suggest that localized protein biotinylation at DNA damage sites is a useful strategy to identify DDR proteins.

Specific Gene Capture Combined with Restriction-Fragment Release for Directly Fluorescent Genotyping of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Diagnosing Spinal Muscular Atrophy

In this study, a fast and simple fluorescent genotyping strategy, streptavidin magnetic beads combined with biotin-coupled PCR and restriction-fragment release, was developed for determination of nucleotide variants. This method was further applied for analyzing SMN1 gene in diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). After biotin-coupled PCR, the streptavidin magnetic beads would capture the biotin-labeled SMN genetic fragments, and then the restriction enzyme of HPY188I could only digest and release the fluorescent end of SMN1 genetic fragment into the supernatant. Therefore, the SMN1 gene could be easily fluorescently quantified, and SMN2 would not, for diagnosis of SMA. The copy number of the SMN1 gene could be regressed using the relative fluorescent unit versus the known copy number, and the coefficient of correlation is equal to 0.9617 ( r = 0.9617). In this research, a total of 16 blind DNA samples were analyzed, including 6 wild types, 5 carriers, and 5 SMA patients. Importantly, this fast, simple, and highly efficient method is universal for detection of all nucleotides variants by replacing the specific restriction enzyme. This technique has the potency to be served as a tool for fast and accurate diagnosis of genotypes in clinical medicine.

Histone H4K20 methylation mediated chromatin compaction threshold ensures genome integrity by limiting DNA replication licensing

The decompaction and re-establishment of chromatin organization immediately after mitosis is essential for genome regulation. Mechanisms underlying chromatin structure control in daughter cells are not fully understood. Here we show that a chromatin compaction threshold in cells exiting mitosis ensures genome integrity by limiting replication licensing in G1 phase. Upon mitotic exit, chromatin relaxation is controlled by SET8-dependent methylation of histone H4 on lysine 20. In the absence of either SET8 or H4K20 residue, substantial genome-wide chromatin decompaction occurs allowing excessive loading of the origin recognition complex (ORC) in the daughter cells. ORC overloading stimulates aberrant recruitment of the MCM2-7 complex that promotes single-stranded DNA formation and DNA damage. Restoring chromatin compaction restrains excess replication licensing and loss of genome integrity. Our findings identify a cell cycle-specific mechanism whereby fine-tuned chromatin relaxation suppresses excessive detrimental replication licensing and maintains genome integrity at the cellular transition from mitosis to G1 phase.

RNF167 targets Arl8B for degradation to regulate lysosome positioning and endocytic trafficking

The protease-associated (PA) domain-containing E3 ubiquitin ligases are transmembrane proteins located in intracellular organelles such as the endoplasmic reticulum, endosomes, or lysosomes. The functional roles of these ubiquitin ligases are not well defined. To understand the function of E3 ubiquitin ligases, identification of their substrates is of critical importance. In this study, we describe a newly devised method based on proximity-dependent biotin labeling to identify substrates of ubiquitin ligases. Application of this method to RING finger protein 167 (RNF167), a member of the PA domain-containing E3 family, led to identification of Arl8B as its substrate. We demonstrated that RNF167 ubiquitinates Arl8B at the lysine residue K141 and reduces the level of the Arl8B protein. Overexpression and knockdown of RNF167 revealed its regulatory role in Arl8B-dependent lysosome positioning and endocytic trafficking to lysosomes. Furthermore, we found that the ubiquitination-defective Arl8B K141R mutant counteracts RNF167 in these cellular events. These results indicate that RNF167 plays a crucial role as an E3 ubiquitin ligase targeting Arl8B to regulate lysosome positioning and endocytic trafficking.

Filling the Void: Proximity-Based Labeling of Proteins in Living Cells

There are inherent limitations with traditional methods to study protein behavior or to determine the constituency of proteins in discrete subcellular compartments. In response to these limitations, several methods have recently been developed that use proximity-dependent labeling. By fusing proteins to enzymes that generate reactive molecules, most commonly biotin, proximate proteins are covalently labeled to enable their isolation and identification. In this review we describe current methods for proximity-dependent labeling in living cells and discuss their applications and future use in the study of protein behavior.

Protein Neighbors and Proximity Proteomics

Within cells, proteins can co-assemble into functionally integrated and spatially restricted multicomponent complexes. Often, the affinities between individual proteins are relatively weak, and proteins within such clusters may interact only indirectly with many of their other protein neighbors. This makes proteomic characterization difficult using methods such as immunoprecipitation or cross-linking. Recently, several groups have described the use of enzyme-catalyzed proximity labeling reagents that covalently tag the neighbors of a targeted protein with a small molecule such as fluorescein or biotin. The modified proteins can then be isolated by standard pulldown methods and identified by mass spectrometry. Here we will describe the techniques as well as their similarities and differences. We discuss their applications both to study protein assemblies and to provide a new way for characterizing organelle proteomes. We stress the importance of proteomic quantitation and independent target validation in such experiments. Furthermore, we suggest that there are biophysical and cell-biological principles that dictate the appropriateness of enzyme-catalyzed proximity labeling methods to address particular biological questions of interest.

Signaling Over Distances

Neurons are extremely polarized cells. Axon lengths often exceed the dimension of the neuronal cell body by several orders of magnitude. These extreme axonal lengths imply that neurons have mastered efficient mechanisms for long distance signaling between soma and synaptic terminal. These elaborate mechanisms are required for neuronal development and maintenance of the nervous system. Neurons can fine-tune long distance signaling through calcium wave propagation and bidirectional transport of proteins, vesicles, and mRNAs along microtubules. The signal transmission over extreme lengths also ensures that information about axon injury is communicated to the soma and allows for repair mechanisms to be engaged. This review focuses on the different mechanisms employed by neurons to signal over long axonal distances and how signals are interpreted in the soma, with an emphasis on proteomic studies. We also discuss how proteomic approaches could help further deciphering the signaling mechanisms operating over long distance in axons.

Marked by association: techniques for proximity-dependent labeling of proteins in eukaryotic cells

Various methods have been established for the purpose of identifying and characterizing protein-protein interactions (PPIs). This diverse toolbox provides researchers with options to overcome challenges specific to the nature of the proteins under investigation. Among these techniques is a category based on proximity-dependent labeling of proteins in living cells. These can be further partitioned into either hypothesis-based or unbiased screening methods, each with its own advantages and limitations. Approaches in which proteins of interest are fused to either modifying enzymes or receptor sequences allow for hypothesis-based testing of protein proximity. Protein crosslinking and BioID (proximity-dependent biotin identification) permit unbiased screening of protein proximity for a protein of interest. Here, we evaluate these approaches and their applications in living eukaryotic cells.

Proteomic characterization of novel histone post-translational modifications

Histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) have been linked to a variety of biological processes and disease states, thus making their characterization a critical field of study. In the last 5 years, a number of novel sites and types of modifications have been discovered, greatly expanding the histone code. Mass spectrometric methods are essential for finding and validating histone PTMs. Additionally, novel proteomic, genomic and chemical biology tools have been developed to probe PTM function. In this snapshot review, proteomic tools for PTM identification and characterization will be discussed and an overview of PTMs found in the last 5 years will be provided.