Purification, crystallization and preliminary crystallographic study of a recombinant plant aminoaldehyde dehydrogenase from Pisum sativum

N-acyl-ω-aminoaldehydes are efficient substrates of plant aminoaldehyde dehydrogenases

Plant aminoaldehyde dehydrogenases (AMADHs, EC 1.2.1.19) belong to the family 10 of aldehyde dehydrogenases and participate in the metabolism of compounds related to amino acids such as polyamines or osmoprotectants. Their broad specificity covers ω-aminoaldehydes, aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes as well as nitrogen-containing heterocyclic aldehydes. The substrate preference of plant AMADHs is determined by the presence of aspartic acid and aromatic residues in the substrate channel. In this work, 15 new N-acyl derivates of 3-aminopropanal (APAL) and 4-aminobutanal (ABAL) were synthesized and confirmed as substrates of two pea AMADH isoenzymes (PsAMADH 1 and 2). The compounds were designed considering the previously demonstrated conversion of N-acetyl derivatives as well as substrate channel dimensions (5-8 Å × 14 Å). The acyl chain length and its branching were found less significant for substrate properties than the length of the initial natural substrate. In general, APAL derivatives were found more efficient than the corresponding ABAL derivatives because of the prevailing higher conversion rates and lower K m values. Differences in enzymatic performance between the two isoenzymes corresponded in part to their preferences to APAL to ABAL. The higher PsAMADH2 affinity to substrates correlated with more frequent occurrence of an excess substrate inhibition. Molecular docking indicated the possible auxiliary role of Tyr163, Ser295 and Gln451 in binding of the new substrates. The only derivative carrying a free carboxyl group (N-adipoyl APAL) was surprisingly better substrate than ABAL in PsAMADH2 reaction indicating that also negatively charged aldehydes might be good substrates for ALDH10 family.

Plant ALDH10 family: identifying critical residues for substrate specificity and trapping a thiohemiacetal intermediate

Plant ALDH10 family members are aminoaldehyde dehydrogenases (AMADHs), which oxidize ω-aminoaldehydes to the corresponding acids. They have been linked to polyamine catabolism, osmoprotection, secondary metabolism (fragrance), and carnitine biosynthesis. Plants commonly contain two AMADH isoenzymes. We previously studied the substrate specificity of two AMADH isoforms from peas (PsAMADHs). Here, two isoenzymes from tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), SlAMADHs, and three AMADHs from maize (Zea mays), ZmAMADHs, were kinetically investigated to obtain further clues to the catalytic mechanism and the substrate specificity. We also solved the high resolution crystal structures of SlAMADH1 and ZmAMADH1a because these enzymes stand out from the others regarding their activity. From the structural and kinetic analysis, we can state that five residues at positions 163, 288, 289, 444, and 454 (PsAMADHs numbering) can, directly or not, significantly modulate AMADH substrate specificity. In the SlAMADH1 structure, a PEG aldehyde derived from the precipitant forms a thiohemiacetal intermediate, never observed so far. Its absence in the SlAMADH1-E260A structure suggests that Glu-260 can activate the catalytic cysteine as a nucleophile. We show that the five AMADHs studied here are capable of oxidizing 3-dimethylsulfoniopropionaldehyde to the cryo- and osmoprotectant 3-dimethylsulfoniopropionate. For the first time, we also show that 3-acetamidopropionaldehyde, the third aminoaldehyde besides 3-aminopropionaldehyde and 4-aminobutyraldehyde, is generally oxidized by AMADHs, meaning that these enzymes are unique in metabolizing and detoxifying aldehyde products of polyamine degradation to nontoxic amino acids. Finally, gene expression profiles in maize indicate that AMADHs might be important for controlling ω-aminoaldehyde levels during early stages of the seed development.

Plant aminoaldehyde dehydrogenases oxidize a wide range of nitrogenous heterocyclic aldehydes

The metabolic degradation of aldehydes is catalyzed by oxidoreductases from which aldehyde dehydrogenases (EC 1.2.1) comprise nonspecific or substrate-specific enzymes. The latter subset is represented, e.g., by NAD(+)-dependent aminoaldehyde dehydrogenases (AMADHs; EC 1.2.1.19) oxidizing a group of naturally occurring ω-aminoaldehydes including polyamine oxidation products. Recombinant isoenzymes from pea (PsAMADH1 and 2) and tomato (LeAMADH1 and 2) were subjected to kinetic measurements with synthetic aldehydes containing a nitrogenous heterocycle such as pyridinecarbaldehydes and their halogenated derivatives, (pyridinylmethylamino)-aldehydes, pyridinyl propanals and aldehydes derived from purine, 7-deazapurine and pyrimidine to characterize their substrate specificity and significance of the resulting data for in vivo reactions. The enzymatic production of the corresponding carboxylic acids was analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Although the studied AMADHs are largely homologous and supposed to have a very similar active site architecture, significant differences were observed. LeAMADH1 displayed the broadest specificity oxidizing almost all compounds followed by PsAMADH2 and 1. In contrast, LeAMADH2 accepted only a few compounds as substrates. Pyridinyl propanals were converted by all isoenzymes, usually better than pyridinecarbaldehydes and aldehydes with fused rings. The K (m) values for the best substrates were in the range of 10(-5)-10(-4) M. Nevertheless, the catalytic efficiency values (V (max)/K (m)) reached only a very small fraction of that with 3-aminopropanal (except for LeAMADH1 activity with two pyridine-derived compounds). Docking experiments using the crystal structure of PsAMADH2 were involved to discuss differences in results with position isomers or alkyl chain homologs.

Carboxylate and aromatic active-site residues are determinants of high-affinity binding of ω-aminoaldehydes to plant aminoaldehyde dehydrogenases

The crystal structures of both isoforms of the aminoaldehyde dehydrogenase from pea (PsAMADH) have been solved recently [Tylichováet al. (2010) J Mol Biol396, 870-882]. The characterization of the PsAMADH2 proteins, altered here by site-directed mutagenesis, suggests that the D110 and D113 residues at the entrance to the substrate channel are required for high-affinity binding of ω-aminoaldehydes to PsAMADH2 and for enzyme activity, whereas N162, near catalytic C294, contributes mainly to the enzyme's catalytic rate. Inside the substrate cavity, W170 and Y163, and, to a certain extent, L166 and M167 probably preserve the optimal overall geometry of the substrate channel that allows for the appropriate orientation of the substrate. Unconserved W288 appears to affect the affinity of the enzyme for the substrate amino group through control of the substrate channel diameter without affecting the reaction rate. Therefore, W288 may be a key determinant of the differences in substrate specificity found among plant AMADH isoforms when they interact with naturally occurring substrates such as 3-aminopropionaldehyde and 4-aminobutyraldehyde.

Structural and functional characterization of plant aminoaldehyde dehydrogenase from Pisum sativum with a broad specificity for natural and synthetic aminoaldehydes

Aminoaldehyde dehydrogenases (AMADHs, EC 1.2.1.19) belong to the large aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) superfamily, namely, the ALDH9 family. They oxidize polyamine-derived omega-aminoaldehydes to the corresponding omega-amino acids. Here, we report the first X-ray structures of plant AMADHs: two isoenzymes, PsAMADH1 and PsAMADH2, from Pisum sativum in complex with beta-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD(+)) at 2.4 and 2.15 A resolution, respectively. Both recombinant proteins are dimeric and, similarly to other ALDHs, each monomer is composed of an oligomerization domain, a coenzyme binding domain and a catalytic domain. Each subunit binds NAD(+) as a coenzyme, contains a solvent-accessible C-terminal peroxisomal targeting signal (type 1) and a cation bound in the cavity close to the NAD(+) binding site. While the NAD(+) binding mode is classical for PsAMADH2, that for PsAMADH1 is unusual among ALDHs. A glycerol molecule occupies the substrate binding site and mimics a bound substrate. Structural analysis and substrate specificity study of both isoenzymes in combination with data published previously on other ALDH9 family members show that the established categorization of such enzymes into distinct groups based on substrate specificity is no more appropriate, because many of them seem capable of oxidizing a large spectrum of aminoaldehyde substrates. PsAMADH1 and PsAMADH2 can oxidize N,N,N-trimethyl-4-aminobutyraldehyde into gamma-butyrobetaine, which is the carnitine precursor in animal cells. This activity highly suggests that in addition to their contribution to the formation of compatible osmolytes such as glycine betaine, beta-alanine betaine and gamma-aminobutyric acid, AMADHs might participate in carnitine biosynthesis in plants.