1
|
Alexander LT, Lepore R, Kryshtafovych A, Adamopoulos A, Alahuhta M, Arvin AM, Bomble YJ, Böttcher B, Breyton C, Chiarini V, Chinnam NB, Chiu W, Fidelis K, Grinter R, Gupta GD, Hartmann MD, Hayes CS, Heidebrecht T, Ilari A, Joachimiak A, Kim Y, Linares R, Lovering AL, Lunin VV, Lupas AN, Makbul C, Michalska K, Moult J, Mukherjee PK, Nutt W(S, Oliver SL, Perrakis A, Stols L, Tainer JA, Topf M, Tsutakawa SE, Valdivia‐Delgado M, Schwede T. Target highlights in CASP14: Analysis of models by structure providers. Proteins 2021; 89:1647-1672. [PMID: 34561912 PMCID: PMC8616854 DOI: 10.1002/prot.26247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The biological and functional significance of selected Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction 14 (CASP14) targets are described by the authors of the structures. The authors highlight the most relevant features of the target proteins and discuss how well these features were reproduced in the respective submitted predictions. The overall ability to predict three-dimensional structures of proteins has improved remarkably in CASP14, and many difficult targets were modeled with impressive accuracy. For the first time in the history of CASP, the experimentalists not only highlighted that computational models can accurately reproduce the most critical structural features observed in their targets, but also envisaged that models could serve as a guidance for further studies of biologically-relevant properties of proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila T. Alexander
- Biozentrum, University of BaselBaselSwitzerland
- Computational Structural BiologySIB Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsBaselSwitzerland
| | | | | | - Athanassios Adamopoulos
- Oncode Institute and Division of BiochemistryNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Markus Alahuhta
- Bioscience Center, National Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoldenColoradoUSA
| | - Ann M. Arvin
- Department of PediatricsStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
- Microbiology and ImmunologyStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Yannick J. Bomble
- Bioscience Center, National Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoldenColoradoUSA
| | - Bettina Böttcher
- Biocenter and Rudolf Virchow Center, Julius‐Maximilians Universität WürzburgWürzburgGermany
| | - Cécile Breyton
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, Institute for Structural BiologyGrenobleFrance
| | - Valerio Chiarini
- Program in Structural Biology and BiophysicsInstitute of Biotechnology, University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| | - Naga babu Chinnam
- Department of Molecular and Cellular OncologyThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Wah Chiu
- Microbiology and ImmunologyStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
- BioengineeringStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
- Division of Cryo‐EM and Bioimaging SSRLSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryMenlo ParkCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Rhys Grinter
- Infection and Immunity Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of MicrobiologyMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
| | - Gagan D. Gupta
- Radiation Biology & Health Sciences DivisionBhabha Atomic Research CentreMumbaiIndia
| | - Marcus D. Hartmann
- Department of Protein EvolutionMax Planck Institute for Developmental BiologyTübingenGermany
| | - Christopher S. Hayes
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental BiologyUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraCaliforniaUSA
- Biomolecular Science and Engineering ProgramUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraCaliforniaUSA
| | - Tatjana Heidebrecht
- Oncode Institute and Division of BiochemistryNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Andrea Ilari
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Pathology of the National Research Council of Italy (CNR)RomeItaly
| | - Andrzej Joachimiak
- Center for Structural Genomics of Infectious Diseases, Consortium for Advanced Science and Engineering, University of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
- X‐ray Science DivisionArgonne National Laboratory, Structural Biology CenterArgonneIllinoisUSA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyUniversity of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Youngchang Kim
- Center for Structural Genomics of Infectious Diseases, Consortium for Advanced Science and Engineering, University of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
- X‐ray Science DivisionArgonne National Laboratory, Structural Biology CenterArgonneIllinoisUSA
| | - Romain Linares
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, Institute for Structural BiologyGrenobleFrance
| | | | - Vladimir V. Lunin
- Bioscience Center, National Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoldenColoradoUSA
| | - Andrei N. Lupas
- Department of Protein EvolutionMax Planck Institute for Developmental BiologyTübingenGermany
| | - Cihan Makbul
- Biocenter and Rudolf Virchow Center, Julius‐Maximilians Universität WürzburgWürzburgGermany
| | - Karolina Michalska
- Center for Structural Genomics of Infectious Diseases, Consortium for Advanced Science and Engineering, University of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
- X‐ray Science DivisionArgonne National Laboratory, Structural Biology CenterArgonneIllinoisUSA
| | - John Moult
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular GeneticsInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of MarylandRockvilleMarylandUSA
| | - Prasun K. Mukherjee
- Nuclear Agriculture & Biotechnology DivisionBhabha Atomic Research CentreMumbaiIndia
| | - William (Sam) Nutt
- Center for Structural Genomics of Infectious Diseases, Consortium for Advanced Science and Engineering, University of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
- X‐ray Science DivisionArgonne National Laboratory, Structural Biology CenterArgonneIllinoisUSA
| | - Stefan L. Oliver
- Department of PediatricsStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Anastassis Perrakis
- Oncode Institute and Division of BiochemistryNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Lucy Stols
- Center for Structural Genomics of Infectious Diseases, Consortium for Advanced Science and Engineering, University of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
- X‐ray Science DivisionArgonne National Laboratory, Structural Biology CenterArgonneIllinoisUSA
| | - John A. Tainer
- Department of Molecular and Cellular OncologyThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
- Department of Cancer BiologyUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Maya Topf
- Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck, University College LondonLondonUK
- Centre for Structural Systems Biology, Leibniz‐Institut für Experimentelle VirologieHamburgGermany
| | - Susan E. Tsutakawa
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated BioimagingLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBerkeleyCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Torsten Schwede
- Biozentrum, University of BaselBaselSwitzerland
- Computational Structural BiologySIB Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsBaselSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gupta GD, Bansal R, Mistry H, Pandey B, Mukherjee PK. Structure-function analysis reveals Trichoderma virens Tsp1 to be a novel fungal effector protein modulating plant defence. Int J Biol Macromol 2021; 191:267-276. [PMID: 34547313 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.09.085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Trichoderma virens colonizes roots and develops a symbiotic relationship with plants where the fungal partner derives nutrients from plants and offers defence, in return. Tsp1, a small secreted cysteine-rich protein, was earlier found to be upregulated in co-cultivation of T. virens with maize roots. Tsp1 is well conserved in Ascomycota division of fungi, but none of its homologs have been studied yet. We have expressed and purified recombinant Tsp1, and resolved its structure to 1.25 Å resolutions, from two crystal forms, using Se-SAD methods. The Tsp1 adopts a β barrel fold and forms dimer in structure as well as in solution form. DALI based structure analysis revealed the structure similarity with two known fungal effector proteins: Alt a1 and PevD1. Structure and evolutionary analysis suggested that Tsp1 belongs to a novel effector protein family. Tsp1 acted as an inducer of salicylic acid mediated susceptibility in plants, rendering maize plants more susceptible to a necrotrophic pathogen Cochliobolus heterostrophus, as observed using plant defence assay and RT-qPCR analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gagan D Gupta
- Radiation Biology & Health Sciences Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai, India.
| | - Ravindra Bansal
- Nuclear Agriculture & Biotechnology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Hiral Mistry
- Radiation Biology & Health Sciences Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai, India
| | - Bharati Pandey
- Radiation Biology & Health Sciences Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Prasun K Mukherjee
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai, India; Nuclear Agriculture & Biotechnology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yu Y, Ding X, Ding Z, Wang Y, Song Y. Fluorescence spectroscopy and molecular docking analysis of the binding of Lactobacillus acidophilus GIM1.208 β-glucosidase with quercetin glycosides. Enzyme Microb Technol 2021; 146:109761. [PMID: 33812560 DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2021.109761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Lactobacillus acidophilus is an important probiotic. The β-glucosidase produced by L. acidophilus GIM1.208 can transform quercetin glycosides of Rosa roxburghii Tratt to release quercetin and improve the functional activity of raw materials. Understanding the interaction and the characteristics of the two will lay a theoretical foundation for the site-directed transformation and functional application of the catalytic active site of enzymes. In our study, using the heterologously expressed and highly stable, purified L. acidophilus GIM1.208 BGL as the strain, the representative quercetin in β-glucosidase and Rosa roxburghii Tratt was preliminarily predicted and explored using ultraviolet-visible absorption spectroscopy. Fluorescence spectroscopy combined with molecular docking was used to determine the interaction characteristics of the glycoside substrates, rutin (Rut) and isoquercitrin (Iso). Results from molecular docking showed that Asp159, Arg56, Iso294, Phe292, and Gly25 were the main residues of β-glucosidase and Rut. Arg56 was found to be the most crucial residue of β-glucosidase and isoquercitrin; the interaction between Rut and Iso and β-glucosidase was mainly driven by hydrogen bonding. The combined free energy of β-glucosidase and Iso was found to be -182.10 kcal/mol, while that of β-glucosidase and Rut was -32.37 kcal/mol. The results of fluorescence spectroscopy showed that the fluorescence intensity of β-glucosidase decreased with an increase in Rut and Iso concentrations. This interaction made β-glucosidase quench endogenous fluorescence, which was static quenching. The binding constants of Rut and Iso with β-glucosidase were determined to be 0.50×107 and 0.31×107 L/mol, respectively, indicating that rutin had a stronger affinity when interacting with β-glucosidase. These findings were consistent with our prediction results determined using molecular docking studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yihong Yu
- School of Liquor & Food Engineering, Guizhou University, National Forestry and Grassland Bureau Prickly Pear Engineering Technology Research Center, Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Animal Products Store and Processing of Guizhou Province, Guiyang, 550025, China
| | - Xiaojuan Ding
- School of Liquor & Food Engineering, Guizhou University, National Forestry and Grassland Bureau Prickly Pear Engineering Technology Research Center, Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Animal Products Store and Processing of Guizhou Province, Guiyang, 550025, China
| | - Zhuhong Ding
- School of Liquor & Food Engineering, Guizhou University, National Forestry and Grassland Bureau Prickly Pear Engineering Technology Research Center, Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Animal Products Store and Processing of Guizhou Province, Guiyang, 550025, China.
| | - Yi Wang
- School of Liquor & Food Engineering, Guizhou University, National Forestry and Grassland Bureau Prickly Pear Engineering Technology Research Center, Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Animal Products Store and Processing of Guizhou Province, Guiyang, 550025, China
| | - Yuting Song
- School of Liquor & Food Engineering, Guizhou University, National Forestry and Grassland Bureau Prickly Pear Engineering Technology Research Center, Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Animal Products Store and Processing of Guizhou Province, Guiyang, 550025, China
| |
Collapse
|