Factors influencing the delivery of cancer pathways: a summary of the literature

Psychological Distress in Patients With Asbestos-Related Diseases and Their Families: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Exposure to asbestos in the workplace is currently recognized as one of the leading causes of work-related deaths, with more than half of deaths attributable to cancer.

AIMS

The aim of this systematic literature review was to investigate the mental health and psychological distress of patients affected by asbestos-related diseases and their caregivers.

METHODS

The review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The studies were identified in October 2023 by searching four electronic databases: Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and PsycInfo/PsycArtcicles. Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI checklist.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles were identified. The studies focused exclusively on the psychological distress of patients with malignant mesothelioma (MM) and their caregivers. MM appears to have traumatic effects on both patients and caregivers, who may experience anxiety and depression, an impoverished emotional life, somatization, social withdrawal, and a deterioration in their quality of life. In addition, a need for information about MM, its progression and associated care tasks was identified, and patients and caregivers reported frequently seeking information from online sources.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review has shown that there are still few studies addressing psychological distress in MM patients and their caregivers, and none addressing distress in the context of other asbestos-related diseases. The somatopsychic consequences of MM in patients and caregivers should encourage institutions and health professionals to develop assessment and intervention models that are tailored to the specific suffering and needs of MM patients and their caregivers and promote their residual vitality.

Rapid diagnostic pathways for prostate cancer: A realist synthesis

INTRODUCTION

The NHS Long-term Plan outlines a number of approaches to address delays and diagnose three out of four cancers at an early stage, and yet patients regularly experience delays to diagnosis. Attempts to address such delays include the implementation of a number of rapid diagnosis pathways (RDPs). This realist review explores rapid diagnosis pathways for prostate cancer, identifying approaches to RDPs, as well as generating theories regarding what works, for whom and under which circumstances.

METHODS

This is a realist evidence synthesis. The questions and approach are informed by patient and public involvement (PPI). We conducted a scoping review to generate initial programme theories and then refined these through further search processes. As a realist review, we do not focus on a specific data type or outcome, rather we include qualitative and quantitative data to inform theories comprised of contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes (CMO chains).

RESULTS

Six studies were included in our scoping review; twenty studies were included in the second review. The studies include qualitative and quantitative data. We identified three broad themes: Primary care, organizational factors, and patient experience.

CONCLUSIONS/ RECOMMENDATIONS

We recommend the involvement of adjoining services (e.g. general practice and radiology) in the planning of prostate cancer RDPs and emphasize the importance of clear communication with patients.

Psychological Interventions for Mesothelioma Patients and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Literature Review

Malignant Mesothelioma (MM) has a striking impact on the somatopsychic balance of patients and their families, including physical, psychological, and interpersonal problems. The aim of this systematic literature review was to investigate what psychological interventions are offered to patients with MM and their caregivers worldwide.

METHODS

The review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The literature search led to the identification of 12 articles. Results were categorized into five categories. 1. Individual psychological support, 2. Group psychological support, 3. Cognitive-behavioral group psychotherapy, 4. Brief psychoanalytic groups, 5. Multifamily group.

RESULTS

The interventions differed in terms of form, duration and resources used. Most of them were group-based and psychoanalytically oriented, although individual and cognitive-behavioral interventions were also described. Despite the differences, the interventions appeared to be fundamental in facilitating the processing of mental pain and anger related to the diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Our study has shown that there are still few psychological interventions available for MM patients and their caregivers. The somatopsychic consequences of MM in patients and caregivers should encourage institutions and healthcare professionals to develop assessment and intervention models that address the different dimensions of their suffering and promote their residual vitality.

Understanding the impact of distance and disadvantage on lung cancer care and outcomes: a study protocol

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the third most common cancer in the UK and the leading cause of cancer mortality globally. NHS England guidance for optimum lung cancer care recommends management and treatment by a specialist team, with experts concentrated in one place, providing access to specialised diagnostic and treatment facilities. However, the complex and rapidly evolving diagnostic and treatment pathways for lung cancer, together with workforce limitations, make achieving this challenging. This place-based, behavioural science-informed qualitative study aims to explore how person-related characteristics interact with a person's location relative to specialist services to impact their engagement with the optimal lung pathway, and to compare and contrast experiences in rural, coastal, and urban communities. This study also aims to generate translatable evidence to inform the evidence-based design of a patient engagement intervention to improve lung cancer patients' and informal carers' participation in and experience of the lung cancer care pathway.

METHODS

A qualitative cross-sectional interview study with people diagnosed with lung cancer < 6 months before recruitment (in receipt of surgery, radical radiotherapy, or living with advanced disease) and their informal carers. Participants will be recruited purposively from Barts Health NHS Trust and United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trusts to ensure a diverse sample across urban and rural settings. Semi-structured interviews will explore factors affecting individuals' capability, opportunity, and motivation to engage with their recommended diagnostic and treatment pathway. A framework approach, informed by the COM-B model, will be used to thematically analyse facilitators and barriers to patient engagement.

DISCUSSION

The study aligns with the current policy priority to ensure that people with cancer, no matter where they live, can access the best quality treatments and care. The evidence generated will be used to ensure that lung cancer services are developed to meet the needs of rural, coastal, and urban communities. The findings will inform the development of an intervention to support patient engagement with their recommended lung cancer pathway.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

The study received NHS Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 23/SC/0255) and NHS Health Research Authority (IRAS ID 328531) approval on 04/08/2023. The study was prospectively registered on Open Science Framework (16/10/2023; https://osf.io/njq48 ).

Hidden systems in primary care cancer detection: an embedded qualitative intervention development study

BACKGROUND

UK cancer mortality is worse than in many other high-income countries, partly because of diagnostic delays in primary care.

AIM

To understand beliefs and behaviours of GPs, and systems of general practice teams, to inform the Think Cancer! intervention development.

DESIGN AND SETTING

An embedded qualitative study guided by behaviour change models (COM-B [Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behaviour] and theoretical domains framework [TDF]) in primary care in Wales, UK.

METHOD

Twenty qualitative, semi-structured telephone interviews with GPs were undertaken and four face-to-face focus groups held with practice teams. Framework analysis was used and results were mapped to multiple, overlapping components of COM-B and TDF.

RESULTS

Three themes illustrate complex, multilevel referral considerations facing GPs and practice teams; external influences and constraints; and the role of practice systems and culture. Tensions emerged between individual considerations of GPs (Capability and Motivation) and context-dependent external pressures (Opportunity). Detecting cancer was guided not only by external requirements, but also by motivational factors GPs described as part of their cancer diagnostics process. External influences on the diagnosis process often resulted from the primary-secondary care interface and social pressures. GPs adapted their behaviour to deal with this disconnect. Positive practice culture and supportive practice-based systems ameliorated these tensions and complexity.

CONCLUSION

By exploring individual GP behaviours together with practice systems and culture we contribute new understanding about how cancer diagnosis operates in primary care and how delays can be improved. We highlight commonly overlooked dynamics and tensions that are experienced by GPs as a tension between individual decision making (Capability and Motivation) and external considerations, such as pressures in secondary care (Opportunity).

Insufficient endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens. When and why? The analysis of criteria and reasons behind the insufficient specimens

BACKGROUND

The classification terminology systems for pulmonary cytology specimens have recently emerged. Inadequate samples, classified as "nondiagnostic," raise challenges in determining the threshold of cell numbers and the risk of malignancy (ROM).

METHODS

The study retrospectively reviewed 248 endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) samples: 46 insufficient samples, 60 low cellularity samples, and 142 adequate samples. Characteristics as cellularity, number of benign and malignant cells, and background features were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to establish cell sufficiency thresholds for the diagnosis.

RESULTS

Out of the 248 samples analyzed, 108 were classified as benign, 94 as malignant, and 46 as insufficient. The study found that the cellularity thresholds for diagnosis in cell blocks and cytological samples were ≥50 cells and ≥100 cells, respectively. The thresholds for tumor cell counts were ≥1 - 10 cells for both types of cells, respectively. Considerably, some low cellularity samples were initially classified as insufficient despite meeting the diagnostic thresholds upon revision. The ROM varied across sample categories, with insufficient samples having a ROM of 10.9%, benign samples 15.7%, suspicious samples 92.0%, and malignant samples 100%.

CONCLUSION

Insufficient EBUS-TBNA samples raise challenges in diagnosis and management. This study identified the root cause of insufficient samples, including factors related to humans, diagnostic methods, sampling, and laboratory processing. By understanding the root causes, diagnostic recommendations can be developed to improve the diagnostic process. The findings emphasize the importance of standardized classification and terminology systems for clear communication among healthcare professionals and institutions, ultimately improving patient care and enabling quality assurance measures.

System dynamics modeling for cancer prevention and control: A systematic review

Cancer prevention and control requires consideration of complex interactions between multilevel factors. System dynamics modeling, which consists of diagramming and simulation approaches for understanding and managing such complexity, is being increasingly applied to cancer prevention and control, but the breadth, characteristics, and quality of these studies is not known. We searched PubMed, Scopus, APA PsycInfo, and eight peer-reviewed journals to identify cancer-related studies that used system dynamics modeling. A dual review process was used to determine eligibility. Included studies were assessed using quality criteria adapted from prior literature and mapped onto the cancer control continuum. Characteristics of studies and models were abstracted and qualitatively synthesized. 32 studies met our inclusion criteria. A mix of simulation and diagramming approaches were used to address diverse topics, including chemotherapy treatments (16%), interventions to reduce tobacco or e-cigarettes use (16%), and cancer risk from environmental contamination (13%). Models spanned all focus areas of the cancer control continuum, with treatment (44%), prevention (34%), and detection (31%) being the most common. The quality assessment of studies was low, particularly for simulation approaches. Diagramming-only studies more often used participatory approaches. Involvement of participants, description of model development processes, and proper calibration and validation of models showed the greatest room for improvement. System dynamics modeling can illustrate complex interactions and help identify potential interventions across the cancer control continuum. Prior efforts have been hampered by a lack of rigor and transparency regarding model development and testing. Supportive infrastructure for increasing awareness, accessibility, and further development of best practices of system dynamics for multidisciplinary cancer research is needed.

An International Consensus on Actions to Improve Lung Cancer Survival: A Modified Delphi Method Among Clinical Experts in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership

BACKGROUND

Research from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) demonstrates that international variation in lung cancer survival persists, particularly within early stage disease. There is a lack of international consensus on the critical contributing components to variation in lung cancer outcomes and the steps needed to optimise lung cancer services. These are needed to improve the quality of options for and equitable access to treatment, and ultimately improve survival.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 9 key informants from ICBP countries. An international clinical network representing 6 ICBP countries (Australia, Canada, Denmark, England, Ireland, New Zealand, Northern Ireland, Scotland & Wales) was established to share local clinical insights and examples of best practice. Using a modified Delphi consensus model, network members suggested and rated recommendations to optimise the management of lung cancer. Calls to Action were developed via Delphi voting as the most crucial recommendations, with Good Practice Points included to support their implementation.

RESULTS

Five Calls to Action and thirteen Good Practice Points applicable to high income, comparable countries were developed and achieved 100% consensus. Calls to Action include (1) Implement cost-effective, clinically efficacious, and equitable lung cancer screening initiatives; (2) Ensure diagnosis of lung cancer within 30 days of referral; (3) Develop Thoracic Centres of Excellence; (4) Undertake an international audit of lung cancer care; and (5) Recognise improvements in lung cancer care and outcomes as a priority in cancer policy.

CONCLUSION

The recommendations presented are the voice of an expert international lung cancer clinical network, and signpost key considerations for policymakers in countries within the ICBP but also in other comparable high-income countries. These define a roadmap to help align and focus efforts in improving outcomes and management of lung cancer patients globally.