Combination of static and temporal data analysis to predict mortality and readmission in the intensive care

Entering the new digital era of intensive care medicine: an overview of interdisciplinary approaches to use artificial intelligence for patients' benefit

The idea of implementing artificial intelligence in medicine is as old as artificial intelligence itself. So far, technical difficulties have prevented the integration of artificial intelligence in day-to-day healthcare. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a substantial amount of funding went into projects to research and implement artificial intelligence in healthcare. So far, artificial intelligence-based tools have had little impact in the fight against COVID-19. The reasons for the lack of success are complex. With advancing digitalisation, new data-based developed methods and research are finding their way into intensive care medicine. Data scientists and medical professionals, representing two different worlds, are slowly uniting. These two highly specialised fields do not yet speak a uniform language. Each field has its own interests and objectives. We took this idea as a starting point for this technical guide and aim to provide a deeper understanding of the terminology, applications, opportunities and risks of such applications for physicians. The most important terms in the field of machine learning are defined within a medical context to assure that the same language is spoken. The future of artificial intelligence applications will largely depend on the ability of artificial intelligence experts and physicians to cooperate in order to release the true power of artificial intelligence. Large research consortia, covering both technical and medical expertise, will grow because of growing demand in the future.

Predictive Modeling for Readmission to Intensive Care: A Systematic Review

To evaluate the methodologic rigor and predictive performance of models predicting ICU readmission; to understand the characteristics of ideal prediction models; and to elucidate relationships between appropriate triage decisions and patient outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase.

STUDY SELECTION

Primary literature that reported the development or validation of ICU readmission prediction models within from 2010 to 2021.

DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant study information was extracted independently by two authors using the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies checklist. Bias was evaluated using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool. Data sources, modeling methodology, definition of outcomes, performance, and risk of bias were critically evaluated to elucidate relevant relationships.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Thirty-three articles describing models were included. Six studies had a high overall risk of bias due to improper inclusion criteria or omission of critical analysis details. Four other studies had an unclear overall risk of bias due to lack of detail describing the analysis. Overall, the most common (50% of studies) source of bias was the filtering of candidate predictors via univariate analysis. The poorest performing models used existing clinical risk or acuity scores such as Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, or Stability and Workload Index for Transfer as the sole predictor. The higher-performing ICU readmission prediction models used homogenous patient populations, specifically defined outcomes, and routinely collected predictors that were analyzed over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Models predicting ICU readmission can achieve performance advantages by using longitudinal time series modeling, homogenous patient populations, and predictor variables tailored to those populations.

Domain Adaptation Using Convolutional Autoencoder and Gradient Boosting for Adverse Events Prediction in the Intensive Care Unit

More than 5 million patients have admitted annually to intensive care units (ICUs) in the United States. The leading causes of mortality are cardiovascular failures, multi-organ failures, and sepsis. Data-driven techniques have been used in the analysis of patient data to predict adverse events, such as ICU mortality and ICU readmission. These models often make use of temporal or static features from a single ICU database to make predictions on subsequent adverse events. To explore the potential of domain adaptation, we propose a method of data analysis using gradient boosting and convolutional autoencoder (CAE) to predict significant adverse events in the ICU, such as ICU mortality and ICU readmission. We demonstrate our results from a retrospective data analysis using patient records from a publicly available database called Multi-parameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care-II (MIMIC-II) and a local database from Children's Healthcare of Atlanta (CHOA). We demonstrate that after adopting novel data imputation on patient ICU data, gradient boosting is effective in both the mortality prediction task and the ICU readmission prediction task. In addition, we use gradient boosting to identify top-ranking temporal and non-temporal features in both prediction tasks. We discuss the relationship between these features and the specific prediction task. Lastly, we indicate that CAE might not be effective in feature extraction on one dataset, but domain adaptation with CAE feature extraction across two datasets shows promising results.

State of the Art of Machine Learning-Enabled Clinical Decision Support in Intensive Care Units: Literature Review

Background

Modern clinical care in intensive care units is full of rich data, and machine learning has great potential to support clinical decision-making. The development of intelligent machine learning–based clinical decision support systems is facing great opportunities and challenges. Clinical decision support systems may directly help clinicians accurately diagnose, predict outcomes, identify risk events, or decide treatments at the point of care.

Objective

We aimed to review the research and application of machine learning–enabled clinical decision support studies in intensive care units to help clinicians, researchers, developers, and policy makers better understand the advantages and limitations of machine learning–supported diagnosis, outcome prediction, risk event identification, and intensive care unit point-of-care recommendations.

Methods

We searched papers published in the PubMed database between January 1980 and October 2020. We defined selection criteria to identify papers that focused on machine learning–enabled clinical decision support studies in intensive care units and reviewed the following aspects: research topics, study cohorts, machine learning models, analysis variables, and evaluation metrics.

Results

A total of 643 papers were collected, and using our selection criteria, 97 studies were found. Studies were categorized into 4 topics—monitoring, detection, and diagnosis (13/97, 13.4%), early identification of clinical events (32/97, 33.0%), outcome prediction and prognosis assessment (46/97, 47.6%), and treatment decision (6/97, 6.2%). Of the 97 papers, 82 (84.5%) studies used data from adult patients, 9 (9.3%) studies used data from pediatric patients, and 6 (6.2%) studies used data from neonates. We found that 65 (67.0%) studies used data from a single center, and 32 (33.0%) studies used a multicenter data set; 88 (90.7%) studies used supervised learning, 3 (3.1%) studies used unsupervised learning, and 6 (6.2%) studies used reinforcement learning. Clinical variable categories, starting with the most frequently used, were demographic (n=74), laboratory values (n=59), vital signs (n=55), scores (n=48), ventilation parameters (n=43), comorbidities (n=27), medications (n=18), outcome (n=14), fluid balance (n=13), nonmedicine therapy (n=10), symptoms (n=7), and medical history (n=4). The most frequently adopted evaluation metrics for clinical data modeling studies included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (n=61), sensitivity (n=51), specificity (n=41), accuracy (n=29), and positive predictive value (n=23).

Conclusions

Early identification of clinical and outcome prediction and prognosis assessment contributed to approximately 80% of studies included in this review. Using new algorithms to solve intensive care unit clinical problems by developing reinforcement learning, active learning, and time-series analysis methods for clinical decision support will be greater development prospects in the future.

Explainable Machine Learning on AmsterdamUMCdb for ICU Discharge Decision Support: Uniting Intensivists and Data Scientists

Unexpected ICU readmission is associated with longer length of stay and increased mortality. To prevent ICU readmission and death after ICU discharge, our team of intensivists and data scientists aimed to use AmsterdamUMCdb to develop an explainable machine learning–based real-time bedside decision support tool.

Early Hospital Mortality Prediction using Vital Signals

Early hospital mortality prediction is critical as intensivists strive to make efficient medical decisions about the severely ill patients staying in intensive care units (ICUs). As a result, various methods have been developed to address this problem based on clinical records. However, some of the laboratory test results are time-consuming and need to be processed. In this paper, we propose a novel method to predict mortality using features extracted from the heart signals of patients within the first hour of ICU admission. In order to predict the risk, quantitative features have been computed based on the heart rate signals of ICU patients suffering cardiovascular diseases. Each signal is described in terms of 12 statistical and signal-based features. The extracted features are fed into eight classifiers: decision tree, linear discriminant, logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), random forest, boosted trees, Gaussian SVM, and K-nearest neighborhood (K-NN). To derive insight into the performance of the proposed method, several experiments have been conducted using the well-known clinical dataset named Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III). The experimental results demonstrate the capability of the proposed method in terms of precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The decision tree classifier satisfies both accuracy and interpretability better than the other classifiers, producing an F1-score and AUC equal to 0.91 and 0.93, respectively. It indicates that heart rate signals can be used for predicting mortality in patients in the care units especially coronary care units (CCUs), achieving a comparable performance with existing predictions that rely on high dimensional features from clinical records which need to be processed and may contain missing information.