1
|
Gohil C, Huang R, Roberts E, van Es MWJ, Quinn AJ, Vidaurre D, Woolrich MW. osl-dynamics, a toolbox for modeling fast dynamic brain activity. eLife 2024; 12:RP91949. [PMID: 38285016 PMCID: PMC10945565 DOI: 10.7554/elife.91949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Neural activity contains rich spatiotemporal structure that corresponds to cognition. This includes oscillatory bursting and dynamic activity that span across networks of brain regions, all of which can occur on timescales of tens of milliseconds. While these processes can be accessed through brain recordings and imaging, modeling them presents methodological challenges due to their fast and transient nature. Furthermore, the exact timing and duration of interesting cognitive events are often a priori unknown. Here, we present the OHBA Software Library Dynamics Toolbox (osl-dynamics), a Python-based package that can identify and describe recurrent dynamics in functional neuroimaging data on timescales as fast as tens of milliseconds. At its core are machine learning generative models that are able to adapt to the data and learn the timing, as well as the spatial and spectral characteristics, of brain activity with few assumptions. osl-dynamics incorporates state-of-the-art approaches that can be, and have been, used to elucidate brain dynamics in a wide range of data types, including magneto/electroencephalography, functional magnetic resonance imaging, invasive local field potential recordings, and electrocorticography. It also provides novel summary measures of brain dynamics that can be used to inform our understanding of cognition, behavior, and disease. We hope osl-dynamics will further our understanding of brain function, through its ability to enhance the modeling of fast dynamic processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetan Gohil
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Rukuang Huang
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Evan Roberts
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Mats WJ van Es
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Andrew J Quinn
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
- Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of BirminghamBirminghamUnited Kingdom
| | - Diego Vidaurre
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
- Center for Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
| | - Mark W Woolrich
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Radcliffe EM, Baumgartner AJ, Kern DS, Al Borno M, Ojemann S, Kramer DR, Thompson JA. Oscillatory beta dynamics inform biomarker-driven treatment optimization for Parkinson's disease. J Neurophysiol 2023; 129:1492-1504. [PMID: 37198135 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00055.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by loss of dopaminergic neurons and dysregulation of the basal ganglia. Cardinal motor symptoms include bradykinesia, rigidity, and tremor. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of select subcortical nuclei is standard of care for medication-refractory PD. Conventional open-loop DBS delivers continuous stimulation with fixed parameters that do not account for a patient's dynamic activity state or medication cycle. In comparison, closed-loop DBS, or adaptive DBS (aDBS), adjusts stimulation based on biomarker feedback that correlates with clinical state. Recent work has identified several neurophysiological biomarkers in local field potential recordings from PD patients, the most promising of which are 1) elevated beta (∼13-30 Hz) power in the subthalamic nucleus (STN), 2) increased beta synchrony throughout basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits, notably observed as coupling between the STN beta phase and cortical broadband gamma (∼50-200 Hz) amplitude, and 3) prolonged beta bursts in the STN and cortex. In this review, we highlight relevant frequency and time domain features of STN beta measured in PD patients and summarize how spectral beta power, oscillatory beta synchrony, phase-amplitude coupling, and temporal beta bursting inform PD pathology, neurosurgical targeting, and DBS therapy. We then review how STN beta dynamics inform predictive, biomarker-driven aDBS approaches for optimizing PD treatment. We therefore provide clinically useful and actionable insight that can be applied toward aDBS implementation for PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin M Radcliffe
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Alexander J Baumgartner
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Drew S Kern
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Mazen Al Borno
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, United States
| | - Steven Ojemann
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Daniel R Kramer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - John A Thompson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tinkhauser G, Moraud EM. Controlling Clinical States Governed by Different Temporal Dynamics With Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation: A Principled Framework. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:734186. [PMID: 34858126 PMCID: PMC8632004 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.734186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Closed-loop strategies for deep brain stimulation (DBS) are paving the way for improving the efficacy of existing neuromodulation therapies across neurological disorders. Unlike continuous DBS, closed-loop DBS approaches (cl-DBS) optimize the delivery of stimulation in the temporal domain. However, clinical and neurophysiological manifestations exhibit highly diverse temporal properties and evolve over multiple time-constants. Moreover, throughout the day, patients are engaged in different activities such as walking, talking, or sleeping that may require specific therapeutic adjustments. This broad range of temporal properties, along with inter-dependencies affecting parallel manifestations, need to be integrated in the development of therapies to achieve a sustained, optimized control of multiple symptoms over time. This requires an extended view on future cl-DBS design. Here we propose a conceptual framework to guide the development of multi-objective therapies embedding parallel control loops. Its modular organization allows to optimize the personalization of cl-DBS therapies to heterogeneous patient profiles. We provide an overview of clinical states and symptoms, as well as putative electrophysiological biomarkers that may be integrated within this structure. This integrative framework may guide future developments and become an integral part of next-generation precision medicine instruments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerd Tinkhauser
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Eduardo Martin Moraud
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies (.NeuroRestore), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Duchet B, Ghezzi F, Weerasinghe G, Tinkhauser G, Kühn AA, Brown P, Bick C, Bogacz R. Average beta burst duration profiles provide a signature of dynamical changes between the ON and OFF medication states in Parkinson's disease. PLoS Comput Biol 2021; 17:e1009116. [PMID: 34233347 PMCID: PMC8263069 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Parkinson's disease motor symptoms are associated with an increase in subthalamic nucleus beta band oscillatory power. However, these oscillations are phasic, and there is a growing body of evidence suggesting that beta burst duration may be of critical importance to motor symptoms. This makes insights into the dynamics of beta bursting generation valuable, in particular to refine closed-loop deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. In this study, we ask the question "Can average burst duration reveal how dynamics change between the ON and OFF medication states?". Our analysis of local field potentials from the subthalamic nucleus demonstrates using linear surrogates that the system generating beta oscillations is more likely to act in a non-linear regime OFF medication and that the change in a non-linearity measure is correlated with motor impairment. In addition, we pinpoint the simplest dynamical changes that could be responsible for changes in the temporal patterning of beta oscillations between medication states by fitting to data biologically inspired models, and simpler beta envelope models. Finally, we show that the non-linearity can be directly extracted from average burst duration profiles under the assumption of constant noise in envelope models. This reveals that average burst duration profiles provide a window into burst dynamics, which may underlie the success of burst duration as a biomarker. In summary, we demonstrate a relationship between average burst duration profiles, dynamics of the system generating beta oscillations, and motor impairment, which puts us in a better position to understand the pathology and improve therapies such as deep brain stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoit Duchet
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Filippo Ghezzi
- Department of Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Gihan Weerasinghe
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Gerd Tinkhauser
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andrea A. Kühn
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Neurology, Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Brown
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Christian Bick
- Department of Mathematics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience - Systems & Network Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Mathematics, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
- EPSRC Centre for Predictive Modelling in Healthcare, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Rafal Bogacz
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sand D, Rappel P, Marmor O, Bick AS, Arkadir D, Lu BL, Bergman H, Israel Z, Eitan R. Machine learning-based personalized subthalamic biomarkers predict ON-OFF levodopa states in Parkinson patients. J Neural Eng 2021; 18. [PMID: 33906182 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/abfc1d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) based on subthalamic nucleus (STN) electrophysiology has recently been proposed to improve clinical outcomes of DBS for Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Many current models for aDBS are based on one or two electrophysiological features of STN activity, such as beta or gamma activity. Although these models have shown interesting results, we hypothesized that an aDBS model that includes many STN activity parameters will yield better clinical results. The objective of this study was to investigate the most appropriate STN neurophysiological biomarkers, detectable over long periods of time, that can predict OFF and ON levodopa states in PD patients.Approach.Long-term local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded from eight STNs (four PD patients) during 92 recording sessions (44 OFF and 48 ON levodopa states), over a period of 3-12 months. Electrophysiological analysis included the power of frequency bands, band power ratio and burst features. A total of 140 engineered features was extracted for 20 040 epochs (each epoch lasting 5 s). Based on these engineered features, machine learning (ML) models classified LFPs as OFF vs ON levodopa states.Main results.Beta and gamma band activity alone poorly predicts OFF vs ON levodopa states, with an accuracy of 0.66 and 0.64, respectively. Group ML analysis slightly improved prediction rates, but personalized ML analysis, based on individualized engineered electrophysiological features, were markedly better, predicting OFF vs ON levodopa states with an accuracy of 0.8 for support vector machine learning models.Significance.We showed that individual patients have unique sets of STN neurophysiological biomarkers that can be detected over long periods of time. ML models revealed that personally classified engineered features most accurately predict OFF vs ON levodopa states. Future development of aDBS for PD patients might include personalized ML algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Sand
- Department of Medical Neurobiology (Physiology), Institute of Medical Research-Israel-Canada, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.,The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Research, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Pnina Rappel
- Department of Medical Neurobiology (Physiology), Institute of Medical Research-Israel-Canada, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.,The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Research, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Odeya Marmor
- Department of Medical Neurobiology (Physiology), Institute of Medical Research-Israel-Canada, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.,The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Research, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Atira S Bick
- Department of Medical Neurobiology (Physiology), Institute of Medical Research-Israel-Canada, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.,The Brain Division, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - David Arkadir
- The Brain Division, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Bao-Liang Lu
- Center for Brain-like Computing and Machine Intelligence, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Hagai Bergman
- Department of Medical Neurobiology (Physiology), Institute of Medical Research-Israel-Canada, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.,The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Research, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.,Functional Neurosurgery Unit, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Zvi Israel
- The Brain Division, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.,Functional Neurosurgery Unit, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Renana Eitan
- Department of Medical Neurobiology (Physiology), Institute of Medical Research-Israel-Canada, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.,The Brain Division, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.,Jerusalem Mental Health Center, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.,Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Castaño-Candamil S, Ferleger BI, Haddock A, Cooper SS, Herron J, Ko A, Chizeck HJ, Tangermann M. A Pilot Study on Data-Driven Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation in Chronically Implanted Essential Tremor Patients. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:541625. [PMID: 33250727 PMCID: PMC7674800 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.541625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential-tremor (ET). In adaptive DBS (aDBS) systems, online tuning of stimulation parameters as a function of neural signals may improve treatment efficacy and reduce side-effects. State-of-the-art aDBS systems use symptom surrogates derived from neural signals-so-called neural markers (NMs)-defined on the patient-group level, and control strategies assuming stationarity of symptoms and NMs. We aim at improving these aDBS systems with (1) a data-driven approach for identifying patient- and session-specific NMs and (2) a control strategy coping with short-term non-stationary dynamics. The two building blocks are implemented as follows: (1) The data-driven NMs are based on a machine learning model estimating tremor intensity from electrocorticographic signals. (2) The control strategy accounts for local variability of tremor statistics. Our study with three chronically implanted ET patients amounted to five online sessions. Tremor quantified from accelerometer data shows that symptom suppression is at least equivalent to that of a continuous DBS strategy in 3 out-of 4 online tests, while considerably reducing net stimulation (at least 24%). In the remaining online test, symptom suppression was not significantly different from either the continuous strategy or the no treatment condition. We introduce a novel aDBS system for ET. It is the first aDBS system based on (1) a machine learning model to identify session-specific NMs, and (2) a control strategy coping with short-term non-stationary dynamics. We show the suitability of our aDBS approach for ET, which opens the door to its further study in a larger patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastián Castaño-Candamil
- Brain State Decoding Lab, Department of Computer Science, BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Benjamin I Ferleger
- BioRobotics Lab, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Andrew Haddock
- BioRobotics Lab, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Sarah S Cooper
- BioRobotics Lab, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Jeffrey Herron
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Andrew Ko
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Howard J Chizeck
- BioRobotics Lab, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Michael Tangermann
- Brain State Decoding Lab, Department of Computer Science, BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.,Autonomous Intelligent Systems, Department of Computer Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.,Artificial Cognitive Systems Lab, Artificial Intelligence Department, Faculty of Social Sciences, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Weerasinghe G, Duchet B, Cagnan H, Brown P, Bick C, Bogacz R. Predicting the effects of deep brain stimulation using a reduced coupled oscillator model. PLoS Comput Biol 2019; 15:e1006575. [PMID: 31393880 PMCID: PMC6701819 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Revised: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is known to be an effective treatment for a variety of neurological disorders, including Parkinson's disease and essential tremor (ET). At present, it involves administering a train of pulses with constant frequency via electrodes implanted into the brain. New 'closed-loop' approaches involve delivering stimulation according to the ongoing symptoms or brain activity and have the potential to provide improvements in terms of efficiency, efficacy and reduction of side effects. The success of closed-loop DBS depends on being able to devise a stimulation strategy that minimizes oscillations in neural activity associated with symptoms of motor disorders. A useful stepping stone towards this is to construct a mathematical model, which can describe how the brain oscillations should change when stimulation is applied at a particular state of the system. Our work focuses on the use of coupled oscillators to represent neurons in areas generating pathological oscillations. Using a reduced form of the Kuramoto model, we analyse how a patient should respond to stimulation when neural oscillations have a given phase and amplitude, provided a number of conditions are satisfied. For such patients, we predict that the best stimulation strategy should be phase specific but also that stimulation should have a greater effect if applied when the amplitude of brain oscillations is lower. We compare this surprising prediction with data obtained from ET patients. In light of our predictions, we also propose a new hybrid strategy which effectively combines two of the closed-loop strategies found in the literature, namely phase-locked and adaptive DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gihan Weerasinghe
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Benoit Duchet
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Hayriye Cagnan
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Brown
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Christian Bick
- Oxford Centre for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Centre for Systems, Dynamics and Control and Department of Mathematics, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
- EPSRC Centre for Predictive Modelling in Healthcare, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Rafal Bogacz
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Staudt MD, Herring EZ, Gao K, Miller JP, Sweet JA. Evolution in the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: From Psychosurgery to Psychopharmacology to Neuromodulation. Front Neurosci 2019; 13:108. [PMID: 30828289 PMCID: PMC6384258 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The treatment of psychiatric patients presents significant challenges to the clinical community, and a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and management is essential to facilitate optimal care. In particular, the neurosurgical treatment of psychiatric disorders, or “psychosurgery,” has held fascination throughout human history as a potential method of influencing behavior and consciousness. Early evidence of such procedures can be traced to prehistory, and interest flourished in the nineteenth and early twentieth century with greater insight into cerebral functional and anatomic localization. However, any discussion of psychosurgery invariably invokes controversy, as the widespread and indiscriminate use of the transorbital lobotomy in the mid-twentieth century resulted in profound ethical ramifications that persist to this day. The concurrent development of effective psychopharmacological treatments virtually eliminated the need and desire for psychosurgical procedures, and accordingly the research and practice of psychosurgery was dormant, but not forgotten. There has been a recent resurgence of interest for non-ablative therapies, due in part to modern advances in functional and structural neuroimaging and neuromodulation technology. In particular, deep brain stimulation is a promising treatment paradigm with the potential to modulate abnormal pathways and networks implicated in psychiatric disease states. Although there is enthusiasm regarding these recent advancements, it is important to reflect on the scientific, social, and ethical considerations of this controversial field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Staudt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.,Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Eric Z Herring
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Keming Gao
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Jonathan P Miller
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Jennifer A Sweet
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|