Wang S, Bouazizi M, Yang S, Ohtsuki T. Accurate Cardiac Duration Detection for Remote Blood Pressure Estimation Using mm-Wave Doppler Radar.
SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2025;
25:619. [PMID:
39943258 PMCID:
PMC11820713 DOI:
10.3390/s25030619]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2024] [Revised: 01/17/2025] [Accepted: 01/18/2025] [Indexed: 02/16/2025]
Abstract
This study introduces a radar-based model for estimating blood pressure (BP) in a touch-free manner. The model accurately detects cardiac activity, allowing for contactless and continuous BP monitoring. Cardiac motions are considered crucial components for estimating blood pressure. Unfortunately, because these movements are extremely subtle and can be readily obscured by breathing and background noise, accurately detecting these motions with a radar system remains challenging. Our approach to radar-based blood pressure monitoring in this research primarily focuses on cardiac feature extraction. Initially, an integrated-spectrum waveform is implemented. The method is derived from the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) and has the ability to capture and maintain minute cardiac activities. The integrated spectrum concentrates on energy changes brought about by short and high-frequency vibrations, in contrast to the pulse-wave signals used in previous works. Hence, the interference caused by respiration, random noise, and heart contractile activity can be effectively eliminated. Additionally, we present two approaches for estimating cardiac characteristics. These methods involve the application of a hidden semi-Markov model (HSMM) and a U-net model to extract features from the integrated spectrum. In our approach, the accuracy of extracted cardiac features is highlighted by the notable decreases in the root mean square error (RMSE) for the estimated interbeat intervals (IBIs), systolic time, and diastolic time, which were reduced by 87.5%, 88.7%, and 73.1%. We reached a comparable prediction accuracy even while our subject was breathing normally, despite previous studies requiring the subject to hold their breath. The diastolic BP (DBP) error of our model is 3.98±5.81 mmHg (mean absolute difference ± standard deviation), and the systolic BP (SBP) error is 6.52±7.51 mmHg.
Collapse