Ventricular fibrillation threshold of rapid short pulses

Output of Electronic Muscle Stimulators: Physical Therapy and Police Models Compared

INTRODUCTION

Both physical therapists and police officers use electrical muscle stimulation. The typical physical therapist unit is attached with adhesive patches while the police models use needle-based electrodes to penetrate clothing. There have been very few papers describing the outputs of these physical therapy EMS (electrical muscle stimulator) units.

METHODS

We purchased 6 TENS/EMS units at retail and tested them with loads of 500 Ω, 2 kΩ, and 10 kΩ.

RESULTS

For the typical impedance of 500 Ω, the EMS units delivered the most current followed by the electrical weapons; TENS units delivered the least current. At higher im-pedances (> 2 kΩ) the electrical weapons delivered more current than the EMS units, which is explained by the higher voltage-compliance of their circuits. Some multi channel EMS units deliver more calculated muscle stimula tion than the multi-channel weapons.

CONCLUSION

Present therapeutic electrical muscle stimula-tors can deliver more current than present law-enforcement muscle stimulators.

Cardiac safety profile for Random Complex Waveforms

INTRODUCTION

A rigorous method for assessing the Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) risk of a Random Complex Waveform (RCW) has not been previously available. Real-life hazardous events motivated us to develop such method. An RCW is observable and recordable. It consists of multiple different components randomly added one to the other. Assessment for VF risk exists for non-random waveforms, particularly VF thresholds for 50/60 Hz alternating currents, but not for RCWs.

METHODS

We developed a method which considers exposure to a segment of an RCW. It transforms complex segment exposure to values which can be compared with AC root-mean-square (rms) magnitude/duration curves, for determination of VF risk. Human contact could occur for any given time duration within the segment. The current of most risk is the greatest found for all possible instances of that duration. This is termed the "Probable Current" (PC) for that duration. All possible exposure durations in the waveform segment are considered, giving a set of PCs, thus allowing the plotting of a PC curve. The PC set is compared with a criterion for VF risk, termed the Justified Current (JC) curve.

RESULTS

The theory is presented. Demonstrations and examples are given. Code is shown for generating the PC curve.

CONCLUSION

VF risk can be found for an RCW using the rigorous algorithm presented.

SIGNIFICANCE

The VF for RCWs has not been considered previously. A rigorous statement of a method for VF risk assessment allows extension from regular waveforms to RCWs.

Transthoracic ventricular fibrillation charge thresholds

Standards, including IEC 60479-1 and -2, provide current-based ventricular fibrillation thresholds (VFT) for stimuli durations between 0.1 ms and 10 s. It has been established that the amount of electrical charge, not the current calculated by root-mean-square, is most representative of the effects of cardiac stimulation. There are no unified models that present transthoracic charge VFTs for a wide range of stimuli durations. This work proposes a new unified charge model applicable to transthoracic stimuli durations ranging over 1 μs - 300 s. VFTs were compiled from our previous animal work and from other published reports, including from the studies that provided the raw data for IEC 60479-1 and -2. Our study goal was to cover a wide range of stimuli durations, for which reliable data exists. Consistent data were found for stimuli durations covering the range of 1 μs - 300 s where VFTs were expressed as charge. The model predicted a transthoracic charge VFT of 1 mC at 1 μs duration. The charge VFT increased with stimulus duration and reached 10 C at 300 s. Presenting the first charge-based transthoracic VFT model covering stimuli durations over 1 μs - 300 s, we found 3 behavioral regions of charge VFT vs.

DURATION

For short stimuli durations, 1 μs - 10 ms, VFTs followed a classic Weiss charge strength-duration curve. For long stimuli, longer than 5 s, charge VFTs can be approximated using a 38 mArms constant current model. From 10 ms to 5 s, charge VFTs tracked through a transition zone that could be approximated as a constant charge model Q≈100 mC.

Validity of the small swine model for human electrical safety risks

Small swine are the most common model now used for electrical safety studies. Because of the significant anatomical and electrophysiological differences and the effect of animal size on the ventricular fibrillation (VF) threshold, there are concerns that these differences may exaggerate the risks of electrical devices to humans. We chose, as an illustrative and relevant example, swine studies of the TASER® conducted electrical weapon (CEW) as it has numerous published VF studies. We reviewed the published electrical swine safety studies for CEWs and compared them to finite element modeling studies, electrical safety standards, and epidemiological experience from field usage. We also compared the body weights of the swine to those of law enforcement arrest-related deaths. Studies of small swine exaggerate the risks of CEWs to humans. This conclusion may be extrapolated to suggest that the use of small swine for electrical safety studies should be questioned in general.

Transthoracic cardiac stimulation thresholds for short pulses

INTRODUCTION

The most common cause of death due to electric shock is ventricular fibrillation (VF). This work reviews applicable results from the literature and provides an estimation model for the risk of VF with short-duration pulses.

METHODS AND RESULTS

For 1 ms pulses, the predicted current and charge thresholds required for successful transthoracic cardiac stimulation were 1.12 A and 1.12 mC, respectively. For pulses of 0.1 ms durations, the transthoracic current and charge thresholds predicted by the model are 10.9 A and 1.09 mC, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In humans, the charge required for single-response cardiac capture using transthoracic electrodes and 0.1 ms pulses is at least 0.5 mC. The transthoracic charge required to trigger repetitive ventricular responses in humans is at least several times higher than that for single responses. Hence, in adult humans, the transthoracic charge threshold required to induce repetitive ventricular responses, tachycardia, or fibrillation, with 0.1 ms pulses is expected to be significantly greater than 1 mC.

Electric fence standards comport with human data and AC limits

INTRODUCTION

The ubiquitous electric fence is essential to modern agriculture and has saved lives by reducing the number of livestock automobile collisions. Modern safety standards such as IEC 60335-2-76 and UL 69 have played a role in this positive result. However, these standards are essentially based on energy and power (RMS current), which have limited direct relationship to cardiac effects. We compared these standards to bioelectrically more relevant units of charge and average current in view of recent work on VF (ventricular fibrillation) induction and to existing IEC AC current limits.

METHODS AND RESULTS

There are 3 limits for normal (low) pulsing rate: IEC energy limit, IEC current limit, and UL current limit. We then calculated the delivered charge allowed for each pulse duration for these limits and then compared them to a charge-based safety model derived from published human ventricular-fibrillation induction data. Both the IEC and UL also allow for rapid pulsing for up to 3 minutes. We calculated maximum outputs for various pulse durations assuming pulsing at 10, 20, and 30 pulses per second. These were then compared to standard utility power safety (AC) limits via the conversion factor of 7.4 to convert average current to RMS current for VF risk. The outputs of TASER electrical weapons (typically < 100 μC and ~100 μs duration) were also compared.

CONCLUSIONS

The IEC and UL electric fence energizer normal rate standards are conservative in comparison with actual human laboratory experiments. The IEC and UL electric fence energizer rapid-pulsing standards are consistent with accepted IEC AC current limits for commercially used pulse durations.

Role of slow delayed rectifying potassium current in dynamics of repolarization and electrical memory in swine ventricles

Dynamics of repolarization, quantified as restitution and electrical memory, impact conduction stability. Relatively less is known about role of slow delayed rectifying potassium current, I(Ks), in dynamics of repolarization and memory compared to the rapidly activating current I(Kr). Trans-membrane potentials were recorded from right ventricular tissues from pigs during reduction (chromanol 293B) and increases in I(Ks) (mefenamic acid). A novel pacing protocol was used to explicitly control diastolic intervals to quantify memory. Restitution hysteresis, a consequence of memory, increased after chromanol 293B (loop thickness and area increased 27 and 38 %) and decreased after mefenamic acid (52 and 53 %). Standard and dynamic restitutions showed an increase in average slope after chromanol 293B and a decrease after mefenamic acid. Increase in slope and memory are hypothesized to have opposite effects on electrical stability; therefore, these results suggest that reduction and enhancement of I(Ks) likely also have offsetting components that affect stability.

Electrical safety of conducted electrical weapons relative to requirements of relevant electrical standards

INTRODUCTION

TASER(®) conducted electrical weapons (CEW) deliver electrical pulses that can inhibit a person's neuromuscular control or temporarily incapacitate. TASER X26, X26P, and X2 are among CEW models most frequently deployed by law enforcement agencies. The X2 CEW uses two cartridge bays while the X26 and X26P CEWs have only one. The TASER X26P CEW electronic output circuit design is equivalent to that of any one of the two TASER X2 outputs. The goal of this paper was to analyze the nominal electrical outputs of TASER X26, X26P, and X2 CEWs in reference to provisions of several international standards that specify safety requirements for electrical medical devices and electrical fences. Although these standards do not specifically mention CEWs, they are the closest electrical safety standards and hence give very relevant guidance.

METHODS

The outputs of two TASER X26 and two TASER X2 CEWs were measured and confirmed against manufacturer and other published specifications. The TASER X26, X26P, and X2 CEWs electrical output parameters were reviewed against relevant safety requirements of UL 69, IEC 60335-2-76 Ed 2.1, IEC 60479-1, IEC 60479-2, AS/NZS 60479.1, AS/NZS 60479.2 and IEC 60601-1. Prior reports on similar topics were reviewed as well.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Our measurements and analyses confirmed that the nominal electrical outputs of TASER X26, X26P and X2 CEWs lie within safety bounds specified by relevant requirements of the above standards.

Essentials of low-power electrocution: established and speculated mechanisms

Even though electrocution has been recognized--and studied--for over a century, there remain several common misconceptions among medical professional as well as lay persons. This review focuses on "low-power" electrocutions rather than on the "high-power" electrocutions such as from lightning and power lines. Low-power electrocution induces ventricular fibrillation (VF). We review the 3 established mechanisms for electrocution: (1) shock on cardiac T-wave, (2) direct induction of VF, and (3) long-term high-rate cardiac capture reducing the VF threshold until VF is induced. There are several electrocution myths addressed, including the concept--often taught in medical school--that direct current causes asystole instead of VF and that electrical exposure can lead to a delayed cardiac arrest by inducing a subclinical ventricular tachycardia (VT). Other misunderstandings are also discussed.