1
|
Zhao Q, Zhang L, Wu L, Qiao H, Liu Z. A Real 3D Embodied Dataset for Robotic Active Visual Learning. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2022. [DOI: 10.1109/lra.2022.3157028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Qianfan Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lingxi Wu
- School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Qiao
- State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiyong Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang RY, Young RJ, Ellingson BM, Veeraraghavan H, Wang W, Tixier F, Um H, Nawaz R, Luks T, Kim J, Gerstner ER, Schiff D, Peters KB, Mellinghoff IK, Chang SM, Cloughesy TF, Wen PY. Volumetric analysis of IDH-mutant lower-grade glioma: a natural history study of tumor growth rates before and after treatment. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:1822-1830. [PMID: 32328652 PMCID: PMC7746936 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lower-grade gliomas (LGGs) with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and/or 2 (IDH1/2) mutations have long survival times, making evaluation of treatment efficacy difficult. We investigated the volumetric growth rate of IDH mutant gliomas before and after treatment with established glioma therapies to determine whether a significant change in growth rate could be documented and perhaps be used in the future to evaluate treatment response to investigational agents in LGG trials. METHODS In this multicenter retrospective study, 230 adult patients with IDH1/2 mutated LGGs (World Health Organization grade II or III) undergoing surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy for progressive non-enhancing tumor were identified. Subjects were required to have 3 MRI scans containing T2/fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging spanning a minimum of 6 months prior to treatment. A mixed-effect model was used to estimate tumor growth prior to treatment. A subset of 95 patients who received chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy and had 2 posttreatment imaging time points available were evaluated for change in pre- and posttreatment volumetric growth rates using a piecewise mixed model. RESULTS The pretreatment volumetric growth rate across all 230 patients was 27.37%/180 days (95% CI: [23.36%, 31.51%]). In the 95 patients with both pre- and posttreatment scans available, there was a significant difference in volumetric growth rates before (26.63%/180 days, 95% CI: [19.31%, 34.40%]) and after treatment (-15.24% /180 days, 95% CI: [-21.37%, -8.62%]) (P < 0.0001). The growth rates for patient subgroup with 1p/19q codeletion (N = 118) was significantly slower than the rate of the 1p/19q non-codeleted group (N = 68) (22.84% vs 35.49%, P = 0.0108). CONCLUSION In this study, we evaluated the growth rates of IDH mutant gliomas before and after standard therapy. Further study is needed to establish whether a change in growth rate is associated with patient survival and its use as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials for IDH mutant LGGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert J Young
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Harini Veeraraghavan
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Wei Wang
- Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Florent Tixier
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hyemin Um
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rasheed Nawaz
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tracy Luks
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - John Kim
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - David Schiff
- Departments of Neurology, Neurological Surgery, and Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Katherine B Peters
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ingo K Mellinghoff
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dudovitch G, Link-Sourani D, Ben Sira L, Miller E, Ben Bashat D, Joskowicz L. Deep Learning Automatic Fetal Structures Segmentation in MRI Scans with Few Annotated Datasets. MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER ASSISTED INTERVENTION – MICCAI 2020 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59725-2_35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
4
|
Sourati J, Gholipour A, Dy JG, Tomas-Fernandez X, Kurugol S, Warfield SK. Intelligent Labeling Based on Fisher Information for Medical Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2019; 38:2642-2653. [PMID: 30932833 PMCID: PMC7179938 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2019.2907805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) have recently achieved superior performance at the task of medical image segmentation compared to classic models. However, training a generalizable CNN requires a large amount of training data, which is difficult, expensive, and time-consuming to obtain in medical settings. Active Learning (AL) algorithms can facilitate training CNN models by proposing a small number of the most informative data samples to be annotated to achieve a rapid increase in performance. We proposed a new active learning method based on Fisher information (FI) for CNNs for the first time. Using efficient backpropagation methods for computing gradients together with a novel low-dimensional approximation of FI enabled us to compute FI for CNNs with a large number of parameters. We evaluated the proposed method for brain extraction with a patch-wise segmentation CNN model in two different learning scenarios: universal active learning and active semi-automatic segmentation. In both scenarios, an initial model was obtained using labeled training subjects of a source data set and the goal was to annotate a small subset of new samples to build a model that performs well on the target subject(s). The target data sets included images that differed from the source data by either age group (e.g. newborns with different image contrast) or underlying pathology that was not available in the source data. In comparison to several recently proposed AL methods and brain extraction baselines, the results showed that FI-based AL outperformed the competing methods in improving the performance of the model after labeling a very small portion of target data set (<0.25%).
Collapse
|
5
|
Um H, Tixier F, Bermudez D, Deasy JO, Young RJ, Veeraraghavan H. Impact of image preprocessing on the scanner dependence of multi-parametric MRI radiomic features and covariate shift in multi-institutional glioblastoma datasets. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 64:165011. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab2f44] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
6
|
Tixier F, Um H, Young RJ, Veeraraghavan H. Reliability of tumor segmentation in glioblastoma: Impact on the robustness of MRI-radiomic features. Med Phys 2019; 46:3582-3591. [PMID: 31131906 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Revised: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of radiomic features as biomarkers of treatment response and outcome or as correlates to genomic variations requires that the computed features are robust and reproducible. Segmentation, a crucial step in radiomic analysis, is a major source of variability in the computed radiomic features. Therefore, we studied the impact of tumor segmentation variability on the robustness of MRI radiomic features. METHOD Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1WICE ) MRI of 90 patients diagnosed with glioblastoma were segmented using a semiautomatic algorithm and an interactive segmentation with two different raters. We analyzed the robustness of 108 radiomic features from five categories (intensity histogram, gray-level co-occurrence matrix, gray-level size-zone matrix (GLSZM), edge maps, and shape) using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland and Altman analysis. RESULTS Our results show that both segmentation methods are reliable with ICC ≥ 0.96 and standard deviation (SD) of mean differences between the two raters (SDdiffs ) ≤ 30%. Features computed from the histogram and co-occurrence matrices were found to be the most robust (ICC ≥ 0.8 and SDdiffs ≤ 30% for most features in these groups). Features from GLSZM were shown to have mixed robustness. Edge, shape, and GLSZM features were the most impacted by the choice of segmentation method with the interactive method resulting in more robust features than the semiautomatic method. Finally, features computed from T1WICE and FLAIR images were found to have similar robustness when computed with the interactive segmentation method. CONCLUSION Semiautomatic and interactive segmentation methods using two raters are both reliable. The interactive method produced more robust features than the semiautomatic method. We also found that the robustness of radiomic features varied by categories. Therefore, this study could help motivate segmentation methods and feature selection in MRI radiomic studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florent Tixier
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Hyemin Um
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Robert J Young
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.,Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Harini Veeraraghavan
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tixier F, Um H, Bermudez D, Iyer A, Apte A, Graham MS, Nevel KS, Deasy JO, Young RJ, Veeraraghavan H. Preoperative MRI-radiomics features improve prediction of survival in glioblastoma patients over MGMT methylation status alone. Oncotarget 2019; 10:660-672. [PMID: 30774763 PMCID: PMC6363013 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.26578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2018] [Accepted: 12/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant central nervous system tumor, and MGMT promoter hypermethylation in this tumor has been shown to be associated with better prognosis. We evaluated the capacity of radiomics features to add complementary information to MGMT status, to improve the ability to predict prognosis. METHODS 159 patients with untreated GBM were included in this study and divided into training and independent test sets. 286 radiomics features were extracted from the magnetic resonance images acquired prior to any treatments. A least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) selection followed by Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the prognostic value of radiomics features to predict overall survival (OS). The combination of MGMT status with radiomics was also investigated and all results were validated on the independent test set. RESULTS LASSO analysis identified 8 out of the 286 radiomic features to be relevant which were then used for determining association to OS. One feature (edge descriptor) remained significant on the external validation cohort after multiple testing (p=0.04) and the combination with MGMT identified a group of patients with the best prognosis with a survival probability of 0.61 after 43 months (p=0.0005). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that combining radiomics with MGMT is more accurate in stratifying patients into groups of different survival risks when compared to with using these predictors in isolation. We identified two subgroups within patients who have methylated MGMT: one with a similar survival to unmethylated MGMT patients and the other with a significantly longer OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florent Tixier
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hyemin Um
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dalton Bermudez
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Aditi Iyer
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Aditya Apte
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Maya S. Graham
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kathryn S. Nevel
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Joseph O. Deasy
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert J. Young
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Harini Veeraraghavan
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jiang J, Hu YC, Liu CJ, Halpenny D, Hellmann MD, Deasy JO, Mageras G, Veeraraghavan H. Multiple Resolution Residually Connected Feature Streams for Automatic Lung Tumor Segmentation From CT Images. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2019; 38:134-144. [PMID: 30040632 PMCID: PMC6402577 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2018.2857800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
Volumetric lung tumor segmentation and accurate longitudinal tracking of tumor volume changes from computed tomography images are essential for monitoring tumor response to therapy. Hence, we developed two multiple resolution residually connected network (MRRN) formulations called incremental-MRRN and dense-MRRN. Our networks simultaneously combine features across multiple image resolution and feature levels through residual connections to detect and segment the lung tumors. We evaluated our method on a total of 1210 non-small cell (NSCLC) lung tumors and nodules from three data sets consisting of 377 tumors from the open-source Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA), 304 advanced stage NSCLC treated with anti- PD-1 checkpoint immunotherapy from internal institution MSKCC data set, and 529 lung nodules from the Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC). The algorithm was trained using 377 tumors from the TCIA data set and validated on the MSKCC and tested on LIDC data sets. The segmentation accuracy compared to expert delineations was evaluated by computing the dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distances, sensitivity, and precision metrics. Our best performing incremental-MRRN method produced the highest DSC of 0.74 ± 0.13 for TCIA, 0.75±0.12 for MSKCC, and 0.68±0.23 for the LIDC data sets. There was no significant difference in the estimations of volumetric tumor changes computed using the incremental-MRRN method compared with the expert segmentation. In summary, we have developed a multi-scale CNN approach for volumetrically segmenting lung tumors which enables accurate, automated identification of and serial measurement of tumor volumes in the lung.
Collapse
|
9
|
Appearance Constrained Semi-Automatic Segmentation from DCE-MRI is Reproducible and Feasible for Breast Cancer Radiomics: A Feasibility Study. Sci Rep 2018; 8:4838. [PMID: 29556054 PMCID: PMC5859113 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22980-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2017] [Accepted: 02/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
We present a segmentation approach that combines GrowCut (GC) with cancer-specific multi-parametric Gaussian Mixture Model (GCGMM) to produce accurate and reproducible segmentations. We evaluated GCGMM using a retrospectively collected 75 invasive ductal carcinoma with ERPR+ HER2− (n = 15), triple negative (TN) (n = 9), and ER-HER2+ (n = 57) cancers with variable presentation (mass and non-mass enhancement) and background parenchymal enhancement (mild and marked). Expert delineated manual contours were used to assess the segmentation performance using Dice coefficient (DSC), mean surface distance (mSD), Hausdorff distance, and volume ratio (VR). GCGMM segmentations were significantly more accurate than GrowCut (GC) and fuzzy c-means clustering (FCM). GCGMM’s segmentations and the texture features computed from those segmentations were the most reproducible compared with manual delineations and other analyzed segmentation methods. Finally, random forest (RF) classifier trained with leave-one-out cross-validation using features extracted from GCGMM segmentation resulted in the best accuracy for ER-HER2+ vs. ERPR+/TN (GCGMM 0.95, expert 0.95, GC 0.90, FCM 0.92) and for ERPR + HER2− vs. TN (GCGMM 0.92, expert 0.91, GC 0.77, FCM 0.83).
Collapse
|
10
|
Sharp G, Fritscher KD, Pekar V, Peroni M, Shusharina N, Veeraraghavan H, Yang J. Vision 20/20: perspectives on automated image segmentation for radiotherapy. Med Phys 2014; 41:050902. [PMID: 24784366 PMCID: PMC4000389 DOI: 10.1118/1.4871620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 239] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2014] [Revised: 04/01/2014] [Accepted: 04/03/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to rapid advances in radiation therapy (RT), especially image guidance and treatment adaptation, a fast and accurate segmentation of medical images is a very important part of the treatment. Manual delineation of target volumes and organs at risk is still the standard routine for most clinics, even though it is time consuming and prone to intra- and interobserver variations. Automated segmentation methods seek to reduce delineation workload and unify the organ boundary definition. In this paper, the authors review the current autosegmentation methods particularly relevant for applications in RT. The authors outline the methods' strengths and limitations and propose strategies that could lead to wider acceptance of autosegmentation in routine clinical practice. The authors conclude that currently, autosegmentation technology in RT planning is an efficient tool for the clinicians to provide them with a good starting point for review and adjustment. Modern hardware platforms including GPUs allow most of the autosegmentation tasks to be done in a range of a few minutes. In the nearest future, improvements in CT-based autosegmentation tools will be achieved through standardization of imaging and contouring protocols. In the longer term, the authors expect a wider use of multimodality approaches and better understanding of correlation of imaging with biology and pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Sharp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - Karl D Fritscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | | | - Marta Peroni
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Nadya Shusharina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - Harini Veeraraghavan
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065
| | - Jinzhong Yang
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang B, Liu W, Prastawa M, Irimia A, Vespa PM, van Horn JD, Fletcher PT, Gerig G. 4D ACTIVE CUT: AN INTERACTIVE TOOL FOR PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY MODELING. PROCEEDINGS. IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING 2014; 2014:529-532. [PMID: 25356193 PMCID: PMC4209480 DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2014.6867925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
4D pathological anatomy modeling is key to understanding complex pathological brain images. It is a challenging problem due to the difficulties in detecting multiple appearing and disappearing lesions across time points and estimating dynamic changes and deformations between them. We propose a novel semi-supervised method, called 4D active cut, for lesion recognition and deformation estimation. Existing interactive segmentation methods passively wait for user to refine the segmentations which is a difficult task in 3D images that change over time. 4D active cut instead actively selects candidate regions for querying the user, and obtains the most informative user feedback. A user simply answers 'yes' or 'no' to a candidate object without having to refine the segmentation slice by slice. Compared to single-object detection of the existing methods, our method also detects multiple lesions with spatial coherence using Markov random fields constraints. Results show improvement on the lesion detection, which subsequently improves deformation estimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Wang
- Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute ; School of Computing, University of Utah
| | - Wei Liu
- Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute ; School of Computing, University of Utah
| | - Marcel Prastawa
- Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute ; School of Computing, University of Utah
| | | | | | | | - P Thomas Fletcher
- Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute ; School of Computing, University of Utah
| | - Guido Gerig
- Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute ; School of Computing, University of Utah
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and (select (case when (4896=2209) then null else ctxsys.drithsx.sn(1,4896) end) from dual) is null-- sxuy] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2022]
|
13
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and (select (case when (1792=1792) then null else ctxsys.drithsx.sn(1,1792) end) from dual) is null] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
14
|
|
15
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and 1553=1080-- bart] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/01/2022]
|
16
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and 3178=convert(int,(select char(113)+char(118)+char(107)+char(106)+char(113)+(select (case when (3178=3178) then char(49) else char(48) end))+char(113)+char(113)+char(122)+char(118)+char(113)))] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
17
|
|
18
|
|
19
|
|
20
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and 2640=(select (case when (2640=6544) then 2640 else (select 6544 union select 6520) end))-- mzfc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2022]
|
21
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 rlike (select (case when (4371=9904) then 0x31302e313031362f6a2e6d72692e323031322e30352e303031 else 0x28 end))-- qcki] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2022]
|
22
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and 5488=utl_inaddr.get_host_address(chr(113)||chr(118)||chr(107)||chr(106)||chr(113)||(select (case when (5488=5488) then 1 else 0 end) from dual)||chr(113)||chr(113)||chr(122)||chr(118)||chr(113))] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
23
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 rlike (select (case when (5886=7226) then 0x31302e313031362f6a2e6d72692e323031322e30352e303031 else 0x28 end))] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
24
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 or (select 7448 from(select count(*),concat(0x71766b6a71,(select (elt(7448=7448,1))),0x71717a7671,floor(rand(0)*2))x from information_schema.plugins group by x)a)-- dbin] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
25
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 or extractvalue(4152,concat(0x5c,0x71766b6a71,(select (elt(4152=4152,1))),0x71717a7671))] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
26
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 order by 1-- xuuy] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
27
|
|
28
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 order by 1#] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2022]
|
29
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and row(7715,4973)>(select count(*),concat(0x71766b6a71,(select (elt(7715=7715,1))),0x71717a7671,floor(rand(0)*2))x from (select 5924 union select 5845 union select 5797 union select 4165)a group by x)-- fnxo] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2022]
|
30
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and extractvalue(9179,concat(0x5c,0x71766b6a71,(select (elt(9179=9179,1))),0x71717a7671))-- shgb] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/01/2022]
|
31
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and (select (case when (2349=2349) then null else cast((chr(103)||chr(81)||chr(74)||chr(66)) as numeric) end)) is null-- zhfv] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2022]
|
32
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and (select (case when (1792=1792) then null else ctxsys.drithsx.sn(1,1792) end) from dual) is null-- zbwn] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2022]
|
33
|
3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and 2499=6436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
34
|
3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and 8732=8732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
35
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 rlike (select (case when (7990=7990) then 0x31302e313031362f6a2e6d72692e323031322e30352e303031 else 0x28 end))] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2022]
|
36
|
|
37
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and (select 8334 from(select count(*),concat(0x71766b6a71,(select (elt(8334=8334,1))),0x71717a7671,floor(rand(0)*2))x from information_schema.plugins group by x)a)-- nctr] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
38
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and extractvalue(9179,concat(0x5c,0x71766b6a71,(select (elt(9179=9179,1))),0x71717a7671))] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/29/2022]
|
39
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and 3348=concat(char(113)+char(118)+char(107)+char(106)+char(113),(select (case when (3348=3348) then char(49) else char(48) end)),char(113)+char(113)+char(122)+char(118)+char(113))] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
40
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and 2959=cast((chr(113)||chr(118)||chr(107)||chr(106)||chr(113))||(select (case when (2959=2959) then 1 else 0 end))::text||(chr(113)||chr(113)||chr(122)||chr(118)||chr(113)) as numeric)-- vwyg] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
41
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and 3178=convert(int,(select char(113)+char(118)+char(107)+char(106)+char(113)+(select (case when (3178=3178) then char(49) else char(48) end))+char(113)+char(113)+char(122)+char(118)+char(113)))-- qyxx] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2022]
|
42
|
|
43
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and (select 8334 from(select count(*),concat(0x71766b6a71,(select (elt(8334=8334,1))),0x71717a7671,floor(rand(0)*2))x from information_schema.plugins group by x)a)] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
44
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 or row(3442,7723)>(select count(*),concat(0x71766b6a71,(select (elt(3442=3442,1))),0x71717a7671,floor(rand(0)*2))x from (select 9605 union select 3910 union select 3326 union select 1181)a group by x)] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
45
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 30:1323-41. [PMID: 22770690 PMCID: PMC3466397 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5010] [Impact Index Per Article: 385.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2012] [Revised: 04/26/2012] [Accepted: 05/29/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Quantitative analysis has tremendous but mostly unrealized potential in healthcare to support objective and accurate interpretation of the clinical imaging. In 2008, the National Cancer Institute began building the Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) initiative with the goal of advancing quantitative imaging in the context of personalized therapy and evaluation of treatment response. Computerized analysis is an important component contributing to reproducibility and efficiency of the quantitative imaging techniques. The success of quantitative imaging is contingent on robust analysis methods and software tools to bring these methods from bench to bedside. 3D Slicer is a free open-source software application for medical image computing. As a clinical research tool, 3D Slicer is similar to a radiology workstation that supports versatile visualizations but also provides advanced functionality such as automated segmentation and registration for a variety of application domains. Unlike a typical radiology workstation, 3D Slicer is free and is not tied to specific hardware. As a programming platform, 3D Slicer facilitates translation and evaluation of the new quantitative methods by allowing the biomedical researcher to focus on the implementation of the algorithm and providing abstractions for the common tasks of data communication, visualization and user interface development. Compared to other tools that provide aspects of this functionality, 3D Slicer is fully open source and can be readily extended and redistributed. In addition, 3D Slicer is designed to facilitate the development of new functionality in the form of 3D Slicer extensions. In this paper, we present an overview of 3D Slicer as a platform for prototyping, development and evaluation of image analysis tools for clinical research applications. To illustrate the utility of the platform in the scope of QIN, we discuss several use cases of 3D Slicer by the existing QIN teams, and we elaborate on the future directions that can further facilitate development and validation of imaging biomarkers using 3D Slicer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andriy Fedorov
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and (select (case when (2349=2349) then null else cast((chr(103)||chr(81)||chr(74)||chr(66)) as numeric) end)) is null] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/01/2022]
|
47
|
|
48
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 and 5488=utl_inaddr.get_host_address(chr(113)||chr(118)||chr(107)||chr(106)||chr(113)||(select (case when (5488=5488) then 1 else 0 end) from dual)||chr(113)||chr(113)||chr(122)||chr(118)||chr(113))-- jgig] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
49
|
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 rlike (select (case when (7990=7990) then 0x31302e313031362f6a2e6d72692e323031322e30352e303031 else 0x28 end))-- qnhl] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
50
|
|