1
|
Maccioni L, Michelle CM, Brusaferri L, Silvestri E, Bertoldo A, Schubert JJ, Nettis MA, Mondelli V, Howes O, Turkheimer FE, Bottlaender M, Bodini B, Stankoff B, Loggia ML, Veronese M. A blood-free modeling approach for the quantification of the blood-to-brain tracer exchange in TSPO PET imaging. Front Neurosci 2024; 18:1395769. [PMID: 39104610 PMCID: PMC11299498 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1395769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Recent evidence suggests the blood-to-brain influx rate (K1 ) in TSPO PET imaging as a promising biomarker of blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability alterations commonly associated with peripheral inflammation and heightened immune activity in the brain. However, standard compartmental modeling quantification is limited by the requirement of invasive and laborious procedures for extracting an arterial blood input function. In this study, we validate a simplified blood-free methodologic framework for K1 estimation by fitting the early phase tracer dynamics using a single irreversible compartment model and an image-derived input function (1T1K-IDIF). Methods The method is tested on a multi-site dataset containing 177 PET studies from two TSPO tracers ([11C]PBR28 and [18F]DPA714). Firstly, 1T1K-IDIF K1 estimates were compared in terms of both bias and correlation with standard kinetic methodology. Then, the method was tested on an independent sample of [11C]PBR28 scans before and after inflammatory interferon-α challenge, and on test-retest dataset of [18F]DPA714 scans. Results Comparison with standard kinetic methodology showed good-to-excellent intra-subject correlation for regional 1T1K-IDIF-K1 (ρintra = 0.93 ± 0.08), although the bias was variable depending on IDIF ability to approximate blood input functions (0.03-0.39 mL/cm3/min). 1T1K-IDIF-K1 unveiled a significant reduction of BBB permeability after inflammatory interferon-α challenge, replicating results from standard quantification. High intra-subject correlation (ρ = 0.97 ± 0.01) was reported between K1 estimates of test and retest scans. Discussion This evidence supports 1T1K-IDIF as blood-free alternative to assess TSPO tracers' unidirectional blood brain clearance. K1 investigation could complement more traditional measures in TSPO studies, and even allow further mechanistic insight in the interpretation of TSPO signal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Maccioni
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Carranza Mellana Michelle
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Paris Brain Institute, ICM, CNRS, Inserm, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Ludovica Brusaferri
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Computer Science and Informatics, School of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom
| | - Erica Silvestri
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Alessandra Bertoldo
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Julia J. Schubert
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria A. Nettis
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Valeria Mondelli
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oliver Howes
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Federico E. Turkheimer
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michel Bottlaender
- BioMaps, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot CEA, CNRS Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Benedetta Bodini
- Paris Brain Institute, ICM, CNRS, Inserm, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Bruno Stankoff
- Paris Brain Institute, ICM, CNRS, Inserm, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Marco L. Loggia
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States
| | - Mattia Veronese
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Narciso L, Deller G, Dassanayake P, Liu L, Pinto S, Anazodo U, Soddu A, Lawrence KS. Simultaneous estimation of a model-derived input function for quantifying cerebral glucose metabolism with [ 18F]FDG PET. EJNMMI Phys 2024; 11:11. [PMID: 38285319 PMCID: PMC10825104 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-024-00614-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quantification of the cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRGlu) by dynamic [18F]FDG PET requires invasive arterial sampling. Alternatives to using an arterial input function (AIF) include the simultaneous estimation (SIME) approach, which models the image-derived input function (IDIF) by a series of exponentials with coefficients obtained by fitting time activity curves (TACs) from multiple volumes-of-interest. A limitation of SIME is the assumption that the input function can be modelled accurately by a series of exponentials. Alternatively, we propose a SIME approach based on the two-tissue compartment model to extract a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) model-derived input function (MDIF) from the whole-brain TAC. The purpose of this study is to present the MDIF approach and its implementation in the analysis of animal and human data. METHODS Simulations were performed to assess the accuracy of the MDIF approach. Animal experiments were conducted to compare derived MDIFs to measured AIFs (n = 5). Using dynamic [18F]FDG PET data from neurologically healthy volunteers (n = 18), the MDIF method was compared to the original SIME-IDIF. Lastly, the feasibility of extracting parametric images was investigated by implementing a variational Bayesian parameter estimation approach. RESULTS Simulations demonstrated that the MDIF can be accurately extracted from a whole-brain TAC. Good agreement between MDIFs and measured AIFs was found in the animal experiments. Similarly, the MDIF-to-IDIF area-under-the-curve ratio from the human data was 1.02 ± 0.08, resulting in good agreement in grey matter CMRGlu: 24.5 ± 3.6 and 23.9 ± 3.2 mL/100 g/min for MDIF and IDIF, respectively. The MDIF method proved superior in characterizing the first pass of [18F]FDG. Groupwise parametric images obtained with the MDIF showed the expected spatial patterns. CONCLUSIONS A model-driven SIME method was proposed to derive high SNR input functions. Its potential was demonstrated by the good agreement between MDIFs and AIFs in animal experiments. In addition, CMRGlu estimates obtained in the human study agreed to literature values. The MDIF approach requires fewer fitting parameters than the original SIME method and has the advantage that it can model the shape of any input function. In turn, the high SNR of the MDIFs has the potential to facilitate the extraction of voxelwise parameters when combined with robust parameter estimation methods such as the variational Bayesian approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Narciso
- Brain Health Imaging Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Graham Deller
- Imaging Program, Lawson Health Research Institute, 268 Grosvenor St, London, ON, N6A 4V2, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Praveen Dassanayake
- Imaging Program, Lawson Health Research Institute, 268 Grosvenor St, London, ON, N6A 4V2, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Linshan Liu
- Imaging Program, Lawson Health Research Institute, 268 Grosvenor St, London, ON, N6A 4V2, Canada
| | - Samara Pinto
- Department of Biomedical Gerontology, PUCRS, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Udunna Anazodo
- Imaging Program, Lawson Health Research Institute, 268 Grosvenor St, London, ON, N6A 4V2, Canada
- Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Andrea Soddu
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Keith St Lawrence
- Imaging Program, Lawson Health Research Institute, 268 Grosvenor St, London, ON, N6A 4V2, Canada.
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gunasekera B, Diederen K, Bhattacharyya S. Cannabinoids, reward processing, and psychosis. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2022; 239:1157-1177. [PMID: 33644820 PMCID: PMC9110536 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-021-05801-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence suggests that an overlap exists between the neurobiology of psychotic disorders and the effects of cannabinoids on neurocognitive and neurochemical substrates involved in reward processing. AIMS We investigate whether the psychotomimetic effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and the antipsychotic potential of cannabidiol (CBD) are underpinned by their effects on the reward system and dopamine. METHODS This narrative review focuses on the overlap between altered dopamine signalling and reward processing induced by cannabinoids, pre-clinically and in humans. A systematic search was conducted of acute cannabinoid drug-challenge studies using neuroimaging in healthy subjects and those with psychosis RESULTS: There is evidence of increased striatal presynaptic dopamine synthesis and release in psychosis, as well as abnormal engagement of the striatum during reward processing. Although, acute THC challenges have elicited a modest effect on striatal dopamine, cannabis users generally indicate impaired presynaptic dopaminergic function. Functional MRI studies have identified that a single dose of THC may modulate regions involved in reward and salience processing such as the striatum, midbrain, insular, and anterior cingulate, with some effects correlating with the severity of THC-induced psychotic symptoms. CBD may modulate brain regions involved in reward/salience processing in an opposite direction to that of THC. CONCLUSIONS There is evidence to suggest modulation of reward processing and its neural substrates by THC and CBD. Whether such effects underlie the psychotomimetic/antipsychotic effects of these cannabinoids remains unclear. Future research should address these unanswered questions to understand the relationship between endocannabinoid dysfunction, reward processing abnormalities, and psychosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon Gunasekera
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Box P067, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Kelly Diederen
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Box P067, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Sagnik Bhattacharyya
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Box P067, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Veronese M, Rizzo G, Belzunce M, Schubert J, Searle G, Whittington A, Mansur A, Dunn J, Reader A, Gunn RN. Reproducibility of findings in modern PET neuroimaging: insight from the NRM2018 grand challenge. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2021; 41:2778-2796. [PMID: 33993794 PMCID: PMC8504414 DOI: 10.1177/0271678x211015101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The reproducibility of findings is a compelling methodological problem that the neuroimaging community is facing these days. The lack of standardized pipelines for image processing, quantification and statistics plays a major role in the variability and interpretation of results, even when the same data are analysed. This problem is well-known in MRI studies, where the indisputable value of the method has been complicated by a number of studies that produce discrepant results. However, any research domain with complex data and flexible analytical procedures can experience a similar lack of reproducibility. In this paper we investigate this issue for brain PET imaging. During the 2018 NeuroReceptor Mapping conference, the brain PET community was challenged with a computational contest involving a simulated neurotransmitter release experiment. Fourteen international teams analysed the same imaging dataset, for which the ground-truth was known. Despite a plurality of methods, the solutions were consistent across participants, although not identical. These results should create awareness that the increased sharing of PET data alone will only be one component of enhancing confidence in neuroimaging results and that it will be important to complement this with full details of the analysis pipelines and procedures that have been used to quantify data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Veronese
- Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | - Martin Belzunce
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, St Thomas’ Hospital, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Julia Schubert
- Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Ayla Mansur
- Invicro LLC, London, UK
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Joel Dunn
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, St Thomas’ Hospital, King’s College London, London, UK
- King's College London & Guy's and St. Thomas' PET Centre, London, UK
| | - Andrew Reader
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, St Thomas’ Hospital, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Roger N Gunn
- Invicro LLC, London, UK
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - and the Grand Challenge Participants#
- Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- Invicro LLC, London, UK
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, St Thomas’ Hospital, King’s College London, London, UK
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
- King's College London & Guy's and St. Thomas' PET Centre, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Borgan F, Veronese M, Reis Marques T, Lythgoe DJ, Howes O. Association between cannabinoid 1 receptor availability and glutamate levels in healthy controls and drug-free patients with first episode psychosis: a multi-modal PET and 1H-MRS study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2021; 271:677-687. [PMID: 32986150 PMCID: PMC8119269 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-020-01191-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Cannabinoid 1 receptor and glutamatergic dysfunction have both been implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. However, it remains unclear if cannabinoid 1 receptor alterations shown in drug-naïve/free patients with first episode psychosis may be linked to glutamatergic alterations in the illness. We aimed to investigate glutamate levels and cannabinoid 1 receptor levels in the same region in patients with first episode psychosis. Forty volunteers (20 healthy volunteers, 20 drug-naïve/free patients with first episode psychosis diagnosed with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder) were included in the study. Glutamate levels were measured using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. CB1R availability was indexed using the distribution volume (VT (ml/cm3)) of [11C]MePPEP using arterial blood sampling. There were no significant associations between ACC CB1R levels and ACC glutamate levels in controls (R = - 0.24, p = 0.32) or patients (R = - 0.10, p = 0.25). However, ACC glutamate levels were negatively associated with CB1R availability in the striatum (R = - 0.50, p = 0.02) and hippocampus (R = - 0.50, p = 0.042) in controls, but these associations were not observed in patients (p > 0.05). Our findings extend our previous work in an overlapping sample to show, for the first time as far as we're aware, that cannabinoid 1 receptor alterations in the anterior cingulate cortex are shown in the absence of glutamatergic dysfunction in the same region, and indicate potential interactions between glutamatergic signalling in the anterior cingulate cortex and the endocannabinoid system in the striatum and hippocampus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faith Borgan
- Psychosis Studies Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England.
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, W12 0NN, UK.
| | - Mattia Veronese
- Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England
| | - Tiago Reis Marques
- Psychosis Studies Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - David J Lythgoe
- Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England
| | - Oliver Howes
- Psychosis Studies Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, W12 0NN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Marques TR, Ashok AH, Angelescu I, Borgan F, Myers J, Lingford-Hughes A, Nutt DJ, Veronese M, Turkheimer FE, Howes OD. GABA-A receptor differences in schizophrenia: a positron emission tomography study using [ 11C]Ro154513. Mol Psychiatry 2021; 26:2616-2625. [PMID: 32296127 PMCID: PMC8440185 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-020-0711-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
A loss of GABA signaling is a prevailing hypothesis for the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Preclinical studies indicate that blockade of the α5 subtype of the GABA receptor (α5-GABAARs) leads to behavioral phenotypes associated with schizophrenia, and postmortem evidence indicates lower hippocampal α5-GABAARs protein and mRNA levels in schizophrenia. However, it is unclear if α5-GABAARs are altered in vivo or related to symptoms. We investigated α5-GABAARs availability in antipsychotic-free schizophrenia patients and antipsychotic-medicated schizophrenia patients using [11C]Ro15-4513 PET imaging in a cross-sectional, case-control study design. Thirty-one schizophrenia patients (n = 10 antipsychotic free) and twenty-nine matched healthy controls underwent a [11C]Ro15-4513 PET scan and MRI. The α5 subtype GABA-A receptor availability was indexed using [11C]Ro15-4513 PET imaging. Dynamic PET data were analyzed using the two-tissue compartment model with an arterial plasma input function and total volume of distribution (VT) as the outcome measure. Symptom severity was assessed using the PANSS scale. There was significantly lower [11C]Ro15-4513 VT in the hippocampus of antipsychotic-free patients, but not in medicated patients (p = 0.64), relative to healthy controls (p < 0.05; effect size = 1.4). There was also a significant positive correlation between [11C]Ro15-4513 VT and total PANSS score in antipsychotic-free patients (r = 0.72; p = 0.044). The results suggest that antipsychotic-free patients with schizophrenia have lower α5-GABAARs levels in the hippocampus, consistent with the hypothesis that GABA hypofunction underlies the pathophysiology of the disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiago Reis Marques
- Psychiatric Imaging Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences (LMS), Imperial College London, London, UK. .,Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Abhishekh H. Ashok
- grid.14105.310000000122478951Psychiatric Imaging Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences (LMS), Imperial College London, London, UK ,grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Ilinca Angelescu
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Faith Borgan
- grid.14105.310000000122478951Psychiatric Imaging Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences (LMS), Imperial College London, London, UK ,grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Jim Myers
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Anne Lingford-Hughes
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Neuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David J. Nutt
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Neuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mattia Veronese
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Federico E. Turkheimer
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Oliver D. Howes
- grid.14105.310000000122478951Psychiatric Imaging Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences (LMS), Imperial College London, London, UK ,grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Terry GE, Raymont V, Horti AG. PET Imaging of the Endocannabinoid System. PET AND SPECT OF NEUROBIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS 2021:319-426. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-53176-8_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|
8
|
Wright P, Veronese M, Mazibuko N, Turkheimer FE, Rabiner EA, Ballard CG, Williams SCR, Hari Narayanan AK, Osrah B, Williams R, Marques TR, Howes OD, Roncaroli F, O'Sullivan MJ. Patterns of Mitochondrial TSPO Binding in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: An in vivo PET Study With Neuropathological Comparison. Front Neurol 2020; 11:541377. [PMID: 33178101 PMCID: PMC7596201 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.541377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Small vessel disease (SVD) is associated with cognitive impairment in older age and be implicated in vascular dementia. Post-mortem studies show proliferation of activated microglia in the affected white matter. However, the role of inflammation in SVD pathogenesis is incompletely understood and better biomarkers are needed. We hypothesized that expression of the 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO), a marker of microglial activation, would be higher in SVD. Positron emission tomography (PET) was performed with the second-generation TSPO ligand [11C]PBR28 in 11 participants with SVD. TSPO binding was evaluated by a two-tissue compartment model, with and without a vascular binding component, in white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and normal-appearing white matter (NAWM). In post-mortem tissue, in a separate cohort of individuals with SVD, immunohistochemistry was performed for TSPO and a pan-microglial marker Iba1. Kinetic modeling showed reduced tracer volume and blood volume fraction in WMH compared with NAWM, but a significant increase in vascular binding. Vascular [11C]PBR28 binding was also increased compared with normal-appearing white matter of healthy participants free of SVD. Immunohistochemistry showed a diffuse increase in microglial staining (with Iba1) in sampled tissue in SVD compared with control samples, but with only a subset of microglia staining positively for TSPO. Intense TSPO staining was observed in the vicinity of damaged small blood vessels, which included perivascular macrophages. The results suggest an altered phenotype of activated microglia, with reduced TSPO expression, in the areas of greatest white matter ischemia in SVD, with implications for the interpretation of TSPO PET studies in older individuals or those with vascular risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Wright
- Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mattia Veronese
- Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ndabezinhle Mazibuko
- Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Federico E. Turkheimer
- Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eugenii A. Rabiner
- Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Invicro, London, United Kingdom
| | - Clive G. Ballard
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Steven C. R. Williams
- Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Avinash Kumar Hari Narayanan
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Centre for Clinical Neuroscience, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Salford, United Kingdom
| | - Bahiya Osrah
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Centre for Clinical Neuroscience, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Salford, United Kingdom
| | - Ricky Williams
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Centre for Clinical Neuroscience, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Salford, United Kingdom
| | - Tiago R. Marques
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oliver D. Howes
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Federico Roncaroli
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Centre for Clinical Neuroscience, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Salford, United Kingdom
| | - Michael J. O'Sullivan
- Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Department of Neurology, The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tjerkaski J, Cervenka S, Farde L, Matheson GJ. Kinfitr - an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability. EJNMMI Res 2020; 10:77. [PMID: 32642865 PMCID: PMC7343683 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00664-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, binding is typically estimated by fitting pharmacokinetic models to the series of measurements of radioactivity in the target tissue following intravenous injection of a radioligand. However, there are multiple different models to choose from and numerous analytical decisions that must be made when modelling PET data. Therefore, it is important that analysis tools be adapted to the specific circumstances, and that analyses be documented in a transparent manner. Kinfitr, written in the open-source programming language R, is a tool developed for flexible and reproducible kinetic modelling of PET data, i.e. performing all steps using code which can be publicly shared in analysis notebooks. In this study, we compared outcomes obtained using kinfitr with those obtained using PMOD: a widely used commercial tool. RESULTS Using previously collected test-retest data obtained with four different radioligands, a total of six different kinetic models were fitted to time-activity curves derived from different brain regions. We observed good correspondence between the two kinetic modelling tools both for binding estimates and for microparameters. Likewise, no substantial differences were observed in the test-retest reliability estimates between the two tools. CONCLUSIONS In summary, we showed excellent agreement between the open-source R package kinfitr, and the widely used commercial application PMOD. We, therefore, conclude that kinfitr is a valid and reliable tool for kinetic modelling of PET data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Tjerkaski
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Simon Cervenka
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lars Farde
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Granville James Matheson
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Auvity S, Tonietto M, Caillé F, Bodini B, Bottlaender M, Tournier N, Kuhnast B, Stankoff B. Repurposing radiotracers for myelin imaging: a study comparing 18F-florbetaben, 18F-florbetapir, 18F-flutemetamol,11C-MeDAS, and 11C-PiB. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 47:490-501. [PMID: 31686177 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04516-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Drugs promoting myelin repair represent a promising therapeutic approach in multiple sclerosis and several candidate molecules are currently being evaluated, fostering the need of a quantitative method to specifically measure myelin content in vivo. PET using the benzothiazole derivative 11C-PiB has been successfully used to quantify myelin content changes in humans. Stilbene derivatives, such as 11C-MeDAS, have also been shown to bind to myelin in animals and are considered a promising radiopharmaceutical class for myelin imaging. Fluorinated compounds from both classes are now commercially available and thus should constitute clinically useful myelin radiotracers. The aim of this study is to provide a head-to-head comparison of 18F-florbetaben, 18F-florbetapir, 18F-flutemetamol, 11C-MeDAS, and 11C-PiB with regard to brain kinetics and binding in white matter (WM). METHODS Four baboons underwent a 90-min dynamic PET scan for each radioligand. Arterial blood samples were collected during the exam for each radiotracer, except for 18F-florbetapir, to obtain a radiometabolite-corrected input function. Standardized uptake value ratio between 75 at 90 min (SUVR75-90), binding potential (BP) estimated with Logan method with input function, and distribution volume ratio (DVR) estimated with Logan reference method (using cerebellar gray matter as reference region) were calculated in WM and compared between tracers using mixed effect models. RESULTS In WM, 18F-florbetapir had the highest SUVR75-90 (1.38 ± 0.03), followed by 18F-flutemetamol (1.34 ± 0.02), 18F-florbetaben (1.32 ± 0.07), 11C-MeDAS (1.27 ± 0.04), and 11C-PiB (1.25 ± 0.07). With regard to BP, 18F-florbetaben had the highest value (0.32 ± 0.06) compared with 18F-flutemetamol (0.20 ± 0.03), 11C-MeDAS (0.17 ± 0.03), and 11C-PiB (0.16 ± 0.03). No difference in DVR was detected between 18F-florbetaben (1.26 ± 0.06) and 18F-florbetapir (1.27 ± 0.03), but both were significantly higher in DVR than 18F-flutemetamol (1.17 ± 0.02), 11C-MeDAS (1.16 ± 0.03), and 11C-PiB (1.14 ± 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Given their higher binding and longer half-life, our study indicates that 18F-florbetapir and 18F-florbetaben are promising tracers for myelin imaging which are readily available for clinical application in demyelinating diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvain Auvity
- UMR 1023 IMIV, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, CEA, Inserm , Université Paris Sud, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Matteo Tonietto
- Sorbonne Universités, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Inserm UMR S 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France
| | - Fabien Caillé
- UMR 1023 IMIV, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, CEA, Inserm , Université Paris Sud, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Benedetta Bodini
- Sorbonne Universités, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Inserm UMR S 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France
| | - Michel Bottlaender
- UMR 1023 IMIV, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, CEA, Inserm , Université Paris Sud, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Nicolas Tournier
- UMR 1023 IMIV, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, CEA, Inserm , Université Paris Sud, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Bertrand Kuhnast
- UMR 1023 IMIV, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, CEA, Inserm , Université Paris Sud, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Bruno Stankoff
- Sorbonne Universités, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Inserm UMR S 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Borgan F, Laurikainen H, Veronese M, Marques TR, Haaparanta-Solin M, Solin O, Dahoun T, Rogdaki M, Salokangas RKR, Karukivi M, Di Forti M, Turkheimer F, Hietala J, Howes O. In Vivo Availability of Cannabinoid 1 Receptor Levels in Patients With First-Episode Psychosis. JAMA Psychiatry 2019; 76:1074-1084. [PMID: 31268519 PMCID: PMC6613300 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Experimental and epidemiological studies implicate the cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB1R) in the pathophysiology of psychosis. However, whether CB1R levels are altered in the early stages of psychosis and whether they are linked to cognitive function or symptom severity remain unknown. OBJECTIVE To investigate CB1R availability in first-episode psychosis (FEP) without the confounds of illness chronicity or the use of illicit substances or antipsychotics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional, case-control study of 2 independent samples included participants receiving psychiatric early intervention services at 2 independent centers in Turku, Finland (study 1) and London, United Kingdom (study 2). Study 1 consisted of 18 volunteers, including 7 patients with affective or nonaffective psychoses taking antipsychotic medication and 11 matched controls; study 2, 40 volunteers, including 20 antipsychotic-naive or antipsychotic-free patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and 20 matched controls. Data were collected from January 5, 2015, through September 26, 2018, and analyzed from June 20, 2016, through February 12, 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The availability of CB1R was indexed using the distribution volume (VT, in milliliters per cubic centimeter) of 2 CB1R-selective positron emission tomography radiotracers: fluoride 18-labeled FMPEP-d2 (study 1) and carbon 11-labeled MePPEP (study 2). Cognitive function was measured using the Wechsler Digit Symbol Coding Test. Symptom severity was measured using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for study 1 and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for study 2. RESULTS A total of 58 male individuals were included in the analyses (mean [SD] age of controls, 27.16 [5.93] years; mean [SD] age of patients, 26.96 [4.55] years). In study 1, 7 male patients with FEP (mean [SD] age, 26.80 [5.40] years) were compared with 11 matched controls (mean [SD] age, 27.18 [5.86] years); in study 2, 20 male patients with FEP (mean [SD] age, 27.00 [5.06] years) were compared with 20 matched controls (mean [SD] age, 27.15 [6.12] years). In study 1, a significant main effect of group on [18F]FMPEP-d2 VT was found in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) (t16 = -4.48; P < .001; Hedges g = 1.2), hippocampus (t16 = -2.98; P = .006; Hedges g = 1.4), striatum (t16 = -4.08; P = .001; Hedges g = 1.9), and thalamus (t16 = -4.67; P < .001; Hedges g = 1.4). In study 2, a significant main effect of group on [11C]MePPEP VT was found in the ACC (Hedges g = 0.8), hippocampus (Hedges g = 0.5), striatum (Hedges g = 0.4), and thalamus (Hedges g = 0.7). In patients, [11C]MePPEP VT in the ACC was positively associated with cognitive functioning (R = 0.60; P = .01), and [11C]MePPEP VT in the hippocampus was inversely associated with Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total symptom severity (R = -0.50; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The availability of CB1R was lower in antipsychotic-treated and untreated cohorts relative to matched controls. Exploratory analyses indicated that greater reductions in CB1R levels were associated with greater symptom severity and poorer cognitive functioning in male patients. These findings suggest that CB1R may be a potential target for the treatment of psychotic disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faith Borgan
- Psychosis Studies Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom,MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Heikki Laurikainen
- Turku PET (Positron Emission Tomography) Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Mattia Veronese
- Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tiago Reis Marques
- Psychosis Studies Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom,MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Merja Haaparanta-Solin
- Turku PET (Positron Emission Tomography) Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Olof Solin
- Turku PET (Positron Emission Tomography) Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Tarik Dahoun
- MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom,Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Rogdaki
- MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Raimo KR Salokangas
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Max Karukivi
- Department of Psychiatry, Turku University, Satakunta Hospital District, Turku, Finland
| | - Marta Di Forti
- Psychosis Studies Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Federico Turkheimer
- Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jarmo Hietala
- Turku PET (Positron Emission Tomography) Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Oliver Howes
- Psychosis Studies Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom,MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|