1
|
Li Z, Li Z, Bilgic B, Lee H, Ying K, Huang SY, Liao H, Tian Q. DIMOND: DIffusion Model OptimizatioN with Deep Learning. ADVANCED SCIENCE (WEINHEIM, BADEN-WURTTEMBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 11:e2307965. [PMID: 38634608 PMCID: PMC11200022 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202307965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging is an important tool for mapping tissue microstructure and structural connectivity non-invasively in the in vivo human brain. Numerous diffusion signal models are proposed to quantify microstructural properties. Nonetheless, accurate estimation of model parameters is computationally expensive and impeded by image noise. Supervised deep learning-based estimation approaches exhibit efficiency and superior performance but require additional training data and may be not generalizable. A new DIffusion Model OptimizatioN framework using physics-informed and self-supervised Deep learning entitled "DIMOND" is proposed to address this problem. DIMOND employs a neural network to map input image data to model parameters and optimizes the network by minimizing the difference between the input acquired data and synthetic data generated via the diffusion model parametrized by network outputs. DIMOND produces accurate diffusion tensor imaging results and is generalizable across subjects and datasets. Moreover, DIMOND outperforms conventional methods for fitting sophisticated microstructural models including the kurtosis and NODDI model. Importantly, DIMOND reduces NODDI model fitting time from hours to minutes, or seconds by leveraging transfer learning. In summary, the self-supervised manner, high efficacy, and efficiency of DIMOND increase the practical feasibility and adoption of microstructure and connectivity mapping in clinical and neuroscientific applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zihan Li
- School of Biomedical EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijing100084P. R. China
| | - Ziyu Li
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical NeurosciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordOX3 9DUUK
| | - Berkin Bilgic
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical ImagingMassachusetts General HospitalCharlestownMA02129USA
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMA02129USA
| | - Hong‐Hsi Lee
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical ImagingMassachusetts General HospitalCharlestownMA02129USA
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMA02129USA
| | - Kui Ying
- Department of Engineering PhysicsTsinghua UniversityBeijing100084P. R. China
| | - Susie Y. Huang
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical ImagingMassachusetts General HospitalCharlestownMA02129USA
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMA02129USA
| | - Hongen Liao
- School of Biomedical EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijing100084P. R. China
| | - Qiyuan Tian
- School of Biomedical EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijing100084P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sairanen V, Andersson J. Outliers in diffusion-weighted MRI: Exploring detection models and mitigation strategies. Neuroimage 2023; 283:120397. [PMID: 37820862 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted MRI (dMRI) is a medical imaging method that can be used to investigate the brain microstructure and structural connections between different brain regions. The method, however, requires relatively complex data processing frameworks and analysis pipelines. Many of these approaches are vulnerable to signal dropout artefacts that can originate from subjects moving their head during the scan. To combat these artefacts and eliminate such outliers, researchers have proposed two approaches: to replace outliers or to downweight outliers during modelling and analysis. With the rising interest in dMRI for clinical research, these types of corrections are increasingly important. Therefore, we set out to investigate the differences between outlier replacement and weighting approaches to help the dMRI community to select the best tool for their data processing pipelines. We evaluated dMRI motion correction registration and single tensor model fit pipelines using Gaussian Process and Spherical Harmonic based replacement approaches and outlier downweighting using highly realistic whole-brain simulations. As a proof of concept, we applied these approaches to dMRI infant data sets that contained varying numbers of dropout artefacts. Based on our results, we concluded that the Gaussian Process based outlier replacement provided similar tensor fit results to Gaussian Process based outlier detection and downweighting. Therefore, if only the least-squares estimate of the single tensor model is of interest, our recommendation is to use outlier replacement. However, outlier downweighting can potentially provide a more accurate estimate of the model precision which could be relevant for applications such as probabilistic tractoraphy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viljami Sairanen
- Baby Brain Activity Center, Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Radiology, Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, Hämeenlinna, Finland.
| | - Jesper Andersson
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Edwards AD, Rueckert D, Smith SM, Abo Seada S, Alansary A, Almalbis J, Allsop J, Andersson J, Arichi T, Arulkumaran S, Bastiani M, Batalle D, Baxter L, Bozek J, Braithwaite E, Brandon J, Carney O, Chew A, Christiaens D, Chung R, Colford K, Cordero-Grande L, Counsell SJ, Cullen H, Cupitt J, Curtis C, Davidson A, Deprez M, Dillon L, Dimitrakopoulou K, Dimitrova R, Duff E, Falconer S, Farahibozorg SR, Fitzgibbon SP, Gao J, Gaspar A, Harper N, Harrison SJ, Hughes EJ, Hutter J, Jenkinson M, Jbabdi S, Jones E, Karolis V, Kyriakopoulou V, Lenz G, Makropoulos A, Malik S, Mason L, Mortari F, Nosarti C, Nunes RG, O’Keeffe C, O’Muircheartaigh J, Patel H, Passerat-Palmbach J, Pietsch M, Price AN, Robinson EC, Rutherford MA, Schuh A, Sotiropoulos S, Steinweg J, Teixeira RPAG, Tenev T, Tournier JD, Tusor N, Uus A, Vecchiato K, Williams LZJ, Wright R, Wurie J, Hajnal JV. The Developing Human Connectome Project Neonatal Data Release. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:886772. [PMID: 35677357 PMCID: PMC9169090 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.886772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The Developing Human Connectome Project has created a large open science resource which provides researchers with data for investigating typical and atypical brain development across the perinatal period. It has collected 1228 multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain datasets from 1173 fetal and/or neonatal participants, together with collateral demographic, clinical, family, neurocognitive and genomic data from 1173 participants, together with collateral demographic, clinical, family, neurocognitive and genomic data. All subjects were studied in utero and/or soon after birth on a single MRI scanner using specially developed scanning sequences which included novel motion-tolerant imaging methods. Imaging data are complemented by rich demographic, clinical, neurodevelopmental, and genomic information. The project is now releasing a large set of neonatal data; fetal data will be described and released separately. This release includes scans from 783 infants of whom: 583 were healthy infants born at term; as well as preterm infants; and infants at high risk of atypical neurocognitive development. Many infants were imaged more than once to provide longitudinal data, and the total number of datasets being released is 887. We now describe the dHCP image acquisition and processing protocols, summarize the available imaging and collateral data, and provide information on how the data can be accessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Institute for AI and Informatics in Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephen M. Smith
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Samy Abo Seada
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amir Alansary
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Almalbis
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joanna Allsop
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jesper Andersson
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Tomoki Arichi
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Arulkumaran
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matteo Bastiani
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Dafnis Batalle
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Luke Baxter
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jelena Bozek
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Eleanor Braithwaite
- Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jacqueline Brandon
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Olivia Carney
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Chew
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daan Christiaens
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Raymond Chung
- BioResource Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kathleen Colford
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Image Technologies, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid and CIBER-BBN, Madrid, Spain
| | - Serena J. Counsell
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Harriet Cullen
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - John Cupitt
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Charles Curtis
- BioResource Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alice Davidson
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Deprez
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Dillon
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Konstantina Dimitrakopoulou
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Translational Bioinformatics Platform, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ralica Dimitrova
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eugene Duff
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Shona Falconer
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Seyedeh-Rezvan Farahibozorg
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sean P. Fitzgibbon
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jianliang Gao
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andreia Gaspar
- Institute for Systems and Robotics (ISR-Lisboa)/LaRSyS, Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nicholas Harper
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam J. Harrison
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Emer J. Hughes
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jana Hutter
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Jenkinson
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Saad Jbabdi
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Jones
- Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Vyacheslav Karolis
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Vanessa Kyriakopoulou
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gregor Lenz
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Antonios Makropoulos
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shaihan Malik
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Luke Mason
- Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Filippo Mortari
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chiara Nosarti
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rita G. Nunes
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Institute for Systems and Robotics (ISR-Lisboa)/LaRSyS, Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Camilla O’Keeffe
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan O’Muircheartaigh
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hamel Patel
- BioResource Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Passerat-Palmbach
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maximillian Pietsch
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony N. Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma C. Robinson
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary A. Rutherford
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Schuh
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stamatios Sotiropoulos
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Johannes Steinweg
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rui Pedro Azeredo Gomes Teixeira
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tencho Tenev
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jacques-Donald Tournier
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nora Tusor
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alena Uus
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katy Vecchiato
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Logan Z. J. Williams
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Wright
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Wurie
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph V. Hajnal
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Taoudi-Benchekroun Y, Christiaens D, Grigorescu I, Gale-Grant O, Schuh A, Pietsch M, Chew A, Harper N, Falconer S, Poppe T, Hughes E, Hutter J, Price AN, Tournier JD, Cordero-Grande L, Counsell SJ, Rueckert D, Arichi T, Hajnal JV, Edwards AD, Deprez M, Batalle D. Predicting age and clinical risk from the neonatal connectome. Neuroimage 2022; 257:119319. [PMID: 35589001 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of perinatal brain connectivity underpins motor, cognitive and behavioural abilities in later life. Diffusion MRI allows the characterisation of subtle inter-individual differences in structural brain connectivity. Individual brain connectivity maps (connectomes) are by nature high in dimensionality and complex to interpret. Machine learning methods are a powerful tool to uncover properties of the connectome which are not readily visible and can give us clues as to how and why individual developmental trajectories differ. In this manuscript we used Deep Neural Networks and Random Forests to predict demographic and neurodevelopmental characteristics from neonatal structural connectomes in a large sample of babies (n = 524) from the developing Human Connectome Project. We achieved an accurate prediction of post menstrual age (PMA) at scan in term-born infants (mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.72 weeks, r = 0.83 and p<0.001). We also achieved good accuracy when predicting gestational age at birth in a cohort of term and preterm babies scanned at term equivalent age (MAE = 2.21 weeks, r = 0.82, p<0.001). We subsequently used sensitivity analysis to obtain feature relevance from our prediction models, with the most important connections for prediction of PMA and GA found to predominantly involve frontal and temporal regions, thalami, and basal ganglia. From our models of PMA at scan for infants born at term, we computed a brain maturation index (predicted age minus actual age) of individual preterm neonates and found a significant correlation between this index and motor outcome at 18 months corrected age. Our results demonstrate the applicability of machine learning techniques in analyses of the neonatal connectome and suggest that a neural substrate of brain maturation with implications for future neurodevelopment is detectable at term equivalent age from the neonatal connectome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yassine Taoudi-Benchekroun
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daan Christiaens
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Irina Grigorescu
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oliver Gale-Grant
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Schuh
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maximilian Pietsch
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Chew
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas Harper
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shona Falconer
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tanya Poppe
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emer Hughes
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jana Hutter
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony N Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - J-Donald Tournier
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Biomedical Image Technologies, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid & CIBER-BBN, Madrid, Spain
| | - Serena J Counsell
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Informatics in Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tomoki Arichi
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Children's Neurosciences, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph V Hajnal
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - A David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Deprez
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dafnis Batalle
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Agdestein SD, Tran TN, Li JR. Practical computation of the diffusion MRI signal based on Laplace eigenfunctions: permeable interfaces. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2022; 35:e4646. [PMID: 34796990 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The complex transverse water proton magnetization subject to diffusion-encoding magnetic field gradient pulses in a heterogeneous medium such as brain tissue can be modeled by the Bloch-Torrey partial differential equation. The spatial integral of the solution of this equation in realistic geometry provides a gold-standard reference model for the diffusion MRI signal arising from different tissue micro-structures of interest. A closed form representation of this reference diffusion MRI signal, called matrix formalism, which makes explicit the link between the Laplace eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the tissue geometry and its diffusion MRI signal, was derived 20 years ago. In addition, once the Laplace eigendecomposition has been computed and saved, the diffusion MRI signal can be calculated for arbitrary diffusion-encoding sequences and b-values at negligible additional cost. In a previous publication, we presented a simulation framework that we implemented inside the MATLAB-based diffusion MRI simulator SpinDoctor that efficiently computes the matrix formalism representation for biological cells subject to impermeable membrane boundary conditions. In this work, we extend our simulation framework to include geometries that contain permeable cell membranes. We describe the new computational techniques that allowed this generalization and we analyze the effects of the magnitude of the permeability coefficient on the eigendecomposition of the diffusion and Bloch-Torrey operators. This work is another step in bringing advanced mathematical tools and numerical method development to the simulation and modeling of diffusion MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jing-Rebecca Li
- INRIA Saclay-Equipe DEFI, CMAP, Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pietsch M, Christiaens D, Hajnal JV, Tournier JD. dStripe: Slice artefact correction in diffusion MRI via constrained neural network. Med Image Anal 2021; 74:102255. [PMID: 34634644 PMCID: PMC8566280 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
MRI scanner and sequence imperfections and advances in reconstruction and imaging techniques to increase motion robustness can lead to inter-slice intensity variations in Echo Planar Imaging. Leveraging deep convolutional neural networks as universal image filters, we present a data-driven method for the correction of acquisition artefacts that manifest as inter-slice inconsistencies, regardless of their origin. This technique can be applied to motion- and dropout-artefacted data by embedding it in a reconstruction pipeline. The network is trained in the absence of ground-truth data on, and finally applied to, the reconstructed multi-shell high angular resolution diffusion imaging signal to produce a corrective slice intensity modulation field. This correction can be performed in either motion-corrected or scattered source-space. We focus on gaining control over the learned filter and the image data consistency via built-in spatial frequency and intensity constraints. The end product is a corrected image reconstructed from the original raw data, modulated by a multiplicative field that can be inspected and verified to match the expected features of the artefact. In-plane, the correction approximately preserves the contrast of the diffusion signal and throughout the image series, it reduces inter-slice inconsistencies within and across subjects without biasing the data. We apply our pipeline to enhance the super-resolution reconstruction of neonatal multi-shell high angular resolution data as acquired in the developing Human Connectome Project.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Pietsch
- Centre for Medical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK; Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Forensic & Neurodevelopmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Daan Christiaens
- Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joseph V Hajnal
- Centre for Medical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK; Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J-Donald Tournier
- Centre for Medical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK; Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mani M, Yang B, Bathla G, Magnotta V, Jacob M. Multi-band- and in-plane-accelerated diffusion MRI enabled by model-based deep learning in q-space and its extension to learning in the spherical harmonic domain. Magn Reson Med 2021; 87:1799-1815. [PMID: 34825729 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To propose a new method for the recovery of combined in-plane- and multi-band (MB)-accelerated diffusion MRI data. METHODS Combining MB acceleration with in-plane acceleration is crucial to improve the time efficiency of high (angular and spatial) resolution diffusion scans. However, as the MB factor and in-plane acceleration increase, the reconstruction becomes challenging due to the heavy aliasing. The new reconstruction utilizes an additional q-space prior to constrain the recovery, which is derived from the previously proposed qModeL framework. Specifically, the qModeL prior provides a pre-learned representation of the diffusion signal space to which the measured data belongs. We show that the pre-learned q-space prior along with a model-based iterative reconstruction that accommodate multi-band unaliasing, can efficiently reconstruct the in-plane- and MB-accelerated data. The power of joint reconstruction is maximally utilized by using an incoherent under-sampling pattern in the k-q domain. We tested the proposed method on single- and multi-shell data, with high/low angular resolution, high/low spatial resolution, healthy/abnormal tissues, and 3T/7T field strengths. Furthermore, the learning is extended to the spherical harmonic basis, to provide a rotational invariant learning framework. RESULTS The qModeL joint reconstruction is shown to simultaneously unalias and jointly recover DWIs with reasonable accuracy in all the cases studied. The reconstruction error from 18-fold accelerated multi-shell datasets was <3%. The microstructural maps derived from the accelerated acquisitions also exhibit reasonable accuracy for both healthy and abnormal tissues. The deep learning (DL)-enabled reconstructions are comparable to those derived using traditional methods. CONCLUSION qModeL enables the joint recovery of combined in-plane- and MB-accelerated dMRI utilizing DL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merry Mani
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | | | - Girish Bathla
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Vincent Magnotta
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Mathews Jacob
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kurokawa R, Kamiya K, Koike S, Nakaya M, Uematsu A, Tanaka SC, Kamagata K, Okada N, Morita K, Kasai K, Abe O. Cross-scanner reproducibility and harmonization of a diffusion MRI structural brain network: A traveling subject study of multi-b acquisition. Neuroimage 2021; 245:118675. [PMID: 34710585 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Characterization of brain networks by diffusion MRI (dMRI) has rapidly evolved, and there are ongoing movements toward data sharing and multi-center studies. To extract meaningful information from multi-center data, methods to correct for the bias caused by scanner differences, that is, harmonization, are urgently needed. In this work, we report the cross-scanner differences in structural network analyses using data from nine traveling subjects (four males and five females, 21-49 years-old) who underwent scanning using four 3T scanners (public database available from the Brain/MINDS Beyond Human Brain MRI project (http://mriportal.umin.jp/)). The reliability and reproducibility were compared to those of data from another set of four subjects (all males, 29-42 years-old) who underwent scan-rescan (interval, 105-147 days) with the same scanner as well as scan-rescan data from the Human Connectome Project database. The results demonstrated that the reliability of the edge weights and graph theory metrics was lower for data including different scanners, compared to the scan-rescan with the same scanner. Besides, systematic differences between scanners were observed, indicating the risk of bias in comparing networks obtained from different scanners directly. We further demonstrate that it is feasible to reduce inter-scanner variabilities while preserving the inter-subject differences among healthy individuals by modeling the scanner effects at the level of network matrices, when traveling-subject data are available for calibration between scanners. The present data and results are expected to serve as a basis for developing and evaluating novel harmonization methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryo Kurokawa
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kouhei Kamiya
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiology, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Shinsuke Koike
- Center for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences (ECS), Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; University of Tokyo Institute for Diversity & Adaptation of Human Mind (UTIDAHM), Tokyo, Japan; University of Tokyo Center for Integrative Science of Human Behavior (CiSHuB), Tokyo, Japan; The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Moto Nakaya
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Akiko Uematsu
- Center for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences (ECS), Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Saori C Tanaka
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International (ATR), Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Koji Kamagata
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Naohiro Okada
- University of Tokyo Institute for Diversity & Adaptation of Human Mind (UTIDAHM), Tokyo, Japan; The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Neuropsychiatry, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kentaro Morita
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kiyoto Kasai
- University of Tokyo Institute for Diversity & Adaptation of Human Mind (UTIDAHM), Tokyo, Japan; University of Tokyo Center for Integrative Science of Human Behavior (CiSHuB), Tokyo, Japan; The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Neuropsychiatry, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Osamu Abe
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Christiaens D, Cordero-Grande L, Pietsch M, Hutter J, Price AN, Hughes EJ, Vecchiato K, Deprez M, Edwards AD, Hajnal JV, Tournier JD. Scattered slice SHARD reconstruction for motion correction in multi-shell diffusion MRI. Neuroimage 2020; 225:117437. [PMID: 33068713 PMCID: PMC7779423 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Subject motion in dMRI leads to a set of scattered slices with unique contrast. We introduce a slice-to-volume reconstruction framework for multi-shell HARDI data Based on a data-driven representation as spherical harmonics and radial decomposition (SHARD). The method is evaluated in test-retest scans and in the neonatal dHCP cohort. Results show robust reconstruction in severely motion-corrupted scans.
Diffusion MRI offers a unique probe into neural microstructure and connectivity in the developing brain. However, analysis of neonatal brain imaging data is complicated by inevitable subject motion, leading to a series of scattered slices that need to be aligned within and across diffusion-weighted contrasts. Here, we develop a reconstruction method for scattered slice multi-shell high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) data, jointly estimating an uncorrupted data representation and motion parameters at the slice or multiband excitation level. The reconstruction relies on data-driven representation of multi-shell HARDI data using a bespoke spherical harmonics and radial decomposition (SHARD), which avoids imposing model assumptions, thus facilitating to compare various microstructure imaging methods in the reconstructed output. Furthermore, the proposed framework integrates slice-level outlier rejection, distortion correction, and slice profile correction. We evaluate the method in the neonatal cohort of the developing Human Connectome Project (650 scans). Validation experiments demonstrate accurate slice-level motion correction across the age range and across the range of motion in the population. Results in the neonatal data show successful reconstruction even in severely motion-corrupted subjects. In addition, we illustrate how local tissue modelling can extract advanced microstructure features such as orientation distribution functions from the motion-corrected reconstructions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daan Christiaens
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Biomedical Image Technologies, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid & CIBER-BBN, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maximilian Pietsch
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jana Hutter
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Anthony N Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Emer J Hughes
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Katy Vecchiato
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Maria Deprez
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Joseph V Hajnal
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J-Donald Tournier
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li JR, Tran TN, Nguyen VD. Practical computation of the diffusion MRI signal of realistic neurons based on Laplace eigenfunctions. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2020; 33:e4353. [PMID: 32725935 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The complex transverse water proton magnetization subject to diffusion-encoding magnetic field gradient pulses in a heterogeneous medium such as brain tissue can be modeled by the Bloch-Torrey partial differential equation. The spatial integral of the solution of this equation in realistic geometry provides a gold-standard reference model for the diffusion MRI signal arising from different tissue micro-structures of interest. A closed form representation of this reference diffusion MRI signal called matrix formalism, which makes explicit the link between the Laplace eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the biological cell and its diffusion MRI signal, was derived 20 years ago. In addition, once the Laplace eigendecomposition has been computed and saved, the diffusion MRI signal can be calculated for arbitrary diffusion-encoding sequences and b-values at negligible additional cost. Up to now, this representation, though mathematically elegant, has not been often used as a practical model of the diffusion MRI signal, due to the difficulties of calculating the Laplace eigendecomposition in complicated geometries. In this paper, we present a simulation framework that we have implemented inside the MATLAB-based diffusion MRI simulator SpinDoctor that efficiently computes the matrix formalism representation for realistic neurons using the finite element method. We show that the matrix formalism representation requires a few hundred eigenmodes to match the reference signal computed by solving the Bloch-Torrey equation when the cell geometry originates from realistic neurons. As expected, the number of eigenmodes required to match the reference signal increases with smaller diffusion time and higher b-values. We also convert the eigenvalues to a length scale and illustrate the link between the length scale and the oscillation frequency of the eigenmode in the cell geometry. We give the transformation that links the Laplace eigenfunctions to the eigenfunctions of the Bloch-Torrey operator and compute the Bloch-Torrey eigenfunctions and eigenvalues. This work is another step in bringing advanced mathematical tools and numerical method development to the simulation and modeling of diffusion MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing-Rebecca Li
- INRIA Saclay-Equipe DEFI, CMAP, Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France
| | - Try Nguyen Tran
- INRIA Saclay-Equipe DEFI, CMAP, Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France
| | - Van-Dang Nguyen
- Division of Computational Science and Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tournier JD, Christiaens D, Hutter J, Price AN, Cordero-Grande L, Hughes E, Bastiani M, Sotiropoulos SN, Smith SM, Rueckert D, Counsell SJ, Edwards AD, Hajnal JV. A data-driven approach to optimising the encoding for multi-shell diffusion MRI with application to neonatal imaging. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2020; 33:e4348. [PMID: 32632961 PMCID: PMC7116416 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Diffusion MRI has the potential to provide important information about the connectivity and microstructure of the human brain during normal and abnormal development, noninvasively and in vivo. Recent developments in MRI hardware and reconstruction methods now permit the acquisition of large amounts of data within relatively short scan times. This makes it possible to acquire more informative multi-shell data, with diffusion sensitisation applied along many directions over multiple b-value shells. Such schemes are characterised by the number of shells acquired, and the specific b-value and number of directions sampled for each shell. However, there is currently no clear consensus as to how to optimise these parameters. In this work, we propose a means of optimising multi-shell acquisition schemes by estimating the information content of the diffusion MRI signal, and optimising the acquisition parameters for sensitivity to the observed effects, in a manner agnostic to any particular diffusion analysis method that might subsequently be applied to the data. This method was used to design the acquisition scheme for the neonatal diffusion MRI sequence used in the developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP), which aims to acquire high quality data and make it freely available to the research community. The final protocol selected by the algorithm, and currently in use within the dHCP, consists of 20 b=0 images and diffusion-weighted images at b = 400, 1000 and 2600 s/mm2 with 64, 88 and 128 directions per shell, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacques-Donald Tournier
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Daan Christiaens
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jana Hutter
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Anthony N Price
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Emer Hughes
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Matteo Bastiani
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging - Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Stamatios N Sotiropoulos
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging - Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Stephen M Smith
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging - Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Serena J Counsell
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - A David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Joseph V Hajnal
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kelly CJ, Christiaens D, Batalle D, Makropoulos A, Cordero-Grande L, Steinweg JK, O'Muircheartaigh J, Khan H, Lee G, Victor S, Alexander DC, Zhang H, Simpson J, Hajnal JV, Edwards AD, Rutherford MA, Counsell SJ. Abnormal Microstructural Development of the Cerebral Cortex in Neonates With Congenital Heart Disease Is Associated With Impaired Cerebral Oxygen Delivery. J Am Heart Assoc 2020; 8:e009893. [PMID: 30821171 PMCID: PMC6474935 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.118.009893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Background Abnormal macrostructural development of the cerebral cortex has been associated with hypoxia in infants with congenital heart disease ( CHD ). Animal studies have suggested that hypoxia results in cortical dysmaturation at the cellular level. New magnetic resonance imaging techniques offer the potential to investigate the relationship between cerebral oxygen delivery and cortical microstructural development in newborn infants with CHD . Methods and Results We measured cortical macrostructural and microstructural properties in 48 newborn infants with serious or critical CHD and 48 age-matched healthy controls. Cortical volume and gyrification index were calculated from high-resolution structural magnetic resonance imaging. Neurite density and orientation dispersion indices were modeled using high-angular-resolution diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral oxygen delivery was estimated in infants with CHD using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging and preductal pulse oximetry. We used gray matter-based spatial statistics to examine voxel-wise group differences in cortical microstructure. Microstructural development of the cortex was abnormal in 48 infants with CHD , with regions of increased fractional anisotropy and reduced orientation dispersion index compared with 48 healthy controls, correcting for gestational age at birth and scan (family-wise error corrected for multiple comparisons at P<0.05). Regions of reduced cortical orientation dispersion index in infants with CHD were related to impaired cerebral oxygen delivery ( R2=0.637; n=39). Cortical orientation dispersion index was associated with the gyrification index ( R2=0.589; P<0.001; n=48). Conclusions This study suggests that the primary component of cerebral cortex dysmaturation in CHD is impaired dendritic arborization, which may underlie abnormal macrostructural findings reported in this population, and that the degree of impairment is related to reduced cerebral oxygen delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Kelly
- 1 Centre for the Developing Brain School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King's College London St Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom
| | - Daan Christiaens
- 1 Centre for the Developing Brain School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King's College London St Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom
| | - Dafnis Batalle
- 1 Centre for the Developing Brain School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King's College London St Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom
| | - Antonios Makropoulos
- 2 Biomedical Image Analysis Group Department of Computing Imperial College London London United Kingdom
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- 1 Centre for the Developing Brain School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King's College London St Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom
| | - Johannes K Steinweg
- 1 Centre for the Developing Brain School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King's College London St Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh
- 1 Centre for the Developing Brain School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King's College London St Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom.,3 Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience London United Kingdom.,4 Department of Neuroimaging King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience London United Kingdom.,5 MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders King's College London London United Kingdom
| | - Hammad Khan
- 6 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit St Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom
| | - Geraint Lee
- 6 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit St Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom
| | - Suresh Victor
- 1 Centre for the Developing Brain School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King's College London St Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom
| | - Daniel C Alexander
- 7 Department of Computer Science and Centre for Medical Image Computing University College London London United Kingdom
| | - Hui Zhang
- 7 Department of Computer Science and Centre for Medical Image Computing University College London London United Kingdom
| | - John Simpson
- 8 Paediatric Cardiology Department Evelina London Children's Hospital St Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom
| | - Joseph V Hajnal
- 1 Centre for the Developing Brain School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King's College London St Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom
| | - A David Edwards
- 1 Centre for the Developing Brain School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King's College London St Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom.,5 MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders King's College London London United Kingdom
| | - Mary A Rutherford
- 1 Centre for the Developing Brain School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King's College London St Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom
| | - Serena J Counsell
- 1 Centre for the Developing Brain School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King's College London St Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fenchel D, Dimitrova R, Seidlitz J, Robinson EC, Batalle D, Hutter J, Christiaens D, Pietsch M, Brandon J, Hughes EJ, Allsop J, O'Keeffe C, Price AN, Cordero-Grande L, Schuh A, Makropoulos A, Passerat-Palmbach J, Bozek J, Rueckert D, Hajnal JV, Raznahan A, McAlonan G, Edwards AD, O'Muircheartaigh J. Development of Microstructural and Morphological Cortical Profiles in the Neonatal Brain. Cereb Cortex 2020; 30:5767-5779. [PMID: 32537627 PMCID: PMC7673474 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Interruptions to neurodevelopment during the perinatal period may have long-lasting consequences. However, to be able to investigate deviations in the foundation of proper connectivity and functional circuits, we need a measure of how this architecture evolves in the typically developing brain. To this end, in a cohort of 241 term-born infants, we used magnetic resonance imaging to estimate cortical profiles based on morphometry and microstructure over the perinatal period (37–44 weeks postmenstrual age, PMA). Using the covariance of these profiles as a measure of inter-areal network similarity (morphometric similarity networks; MSN), we clustered these networks into distinct modules. The resulting modules were consistent and symmetric, and corresponded to known functional distinctions, including sensory–motor, limbic, and association regions, and were spatially mapped onto known cytoarchitectonic tissue classes. Posterior regions became more morphometrically similar with increasing age, while peri-cingulate and medial temporal regions became more dissimilar. Network strength was associated with age: Within-network similarity increased over age suggesting emerging network distinction. These changes in cortical network architecture over an 8-week period are consistent with, and likely underpin, the highly dynamic processes occurring during this critical period. The resulting cortical profiles might provide normative reference to investigate atypical early brain development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphna Fenchel
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.,Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Ralica Dimitrova
- Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Jakob Seidlitz
- Developmental Neurogenomics Unit, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EU, UK
| | - Dafnis Batalle
- Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Jana Hutter
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Daan Christiaens
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Maximilian Pietsch
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Jakki Brandon
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Emer J Hughes
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Joanna Allsop
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Camilla O'Keeffe
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Anthony N Price
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Andreas Schuh
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Antonios Makropoulos
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | | | - Jelena Bozek
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Joseph V Hajnal
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Armin Raznahan
- Developmental Neurogenomics Unit, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Grainne McAlonan
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.,Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 8AZ, UK
| | - A David Edwards
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.,Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.,Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Christiaens D, Veraart J, Cordero-Grande L, Price AN, Hutter J, Hajnal JV, Tournier JD. On the need for bundle-specific microstructure kernels in diffusion MRI. Neuroimage 2019; 208:116460. [PMID: 31843710 PMCID: PMC7014821 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Revised: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Probing microstructure with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) on a scale orders of magnitude below the imaging resolution relies on biophysical modelling of the signal response in the tissue. The vast majority of these biophysical models of diffusion in white matter assume that the measured dMRI signal is the sum of the signals emanating from each of the constituent compartments, each of which exhibits a distinct behaviour in the b-value and/or orientation domain. Many of these models further assume that the dMRI behaviour of the oriented compartments (e.g. the intra-axonal space) is identical between distinct fibre populations, at least at the level of a single voxel. This implicitly assumes that any potential biological differences between fibre populations are negligible, at least as far as is measurable using dMRI. Here, we validate this assumption by means of a voxel-wise, model-free signal decomposition that, under the assumption above and in the absence of noise, is shown to be rank-1. We evaluate the effect size of signal components beyond this rank-1 representation and use permutation testing to assess their significance. We conclude that in the healthy adult brain, the dMRI signal is adequately represented by a rank-1 model, implying that biologically more realistic, but mathematically more complex fascicle-specific microstructure models do not capture statistically significant or anatomically meaningful structure, even in extended high-b diffusion MRI scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daan Christiaens
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Jelle Veraart
- Centre for Biomedical Imaging, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; iMinds - Vision Lab, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Anthony N Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jana Hutter
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Joseph V Hajnal
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J-Donald Tournier
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nath V, Lyu I, Schilling KG, Parvathaneni P, Hansen CB, Tang Y, Huo Y, Janve VA, Gao Y, Stepniewska I, Anderson AW, Landman BA. Enabling Multi-Shell b-Value Generalizability of Data-Driven Diffusion Models with Deep SHORE. MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION : MICCAI ... INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION 2019; 11766:573-581. [PMID: 34113926 PMCID: PMC8188904 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32248-9_64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2024]
Abstract
Intra-voxel models of the diffusion signal are essential for interpreting organization of the tissue environment at micrometer level with data at millimeter resolution. Recent advances in data driven methods have enabled direct comparison and optimization of methods for in-vivo data with externally validated histological sections with both 2-D and 3-D histology. Yet, all existing methods make limiting assumptions of either (1) model-based linkages between b-values or (2) limited associations with single shell data. We generalize prior deep learning models that used single shell spherical harmonic transforms to integrate the recently developed simple harmonic oscillator reconstruction (SHORE) basis. To enable learning on the SHORE manifold, we present an alternative formulation of the fiber orientation distribution (FOD) object using the SHORE basis while representing the observed diffusion weighted data in the SHORE basis. To ensure consistency of hyper-parameter optimization for SHORE, we present our Deep SHORE approach to learn on a data-optimized manifold. Deep SHORE is evaluated with eight-fold cross-validation of a preclinical MRI-histology data with four b-values. Generalizability of in-vivo human data is evaluated on two separate 3T MRI scanners. Specificity in terms of angular correlation (ACC) with the preclinical data improved on single shell: 0.78 relative to 0.73 and 0.73, multi-shell: 0.80 relative to 0.74 (p < 0.001). In the in-vivo human data, Deep SHORE was more consistent across scanners with 0.63 relative to other multi-shell methods 0.39, 0.52 and 0.57 in terms of ACC. In conclusion, Deep SHORE is a promising method to enable data driven learning with DW-MRI under conditions with varying b-values, number of diffusion shells, and gradient directions per shell.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishwesh Nath
- Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37203, USA
| | - Ilwoo Lyu
- Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37203, USA
| | - Kurt G Schilling
- Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | | | - Colin B Hansen
- Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37203, USA
| | - Yucheng Tang
- Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37203, USA
| | - Yuankai Huo
- Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37203, USA
| | - Vaibhav A Janve
- Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Yurui Gao
- Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | | | - Adam W Anderson
- Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Bennett A Landman
- Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Koch A, Zhukov A, Stöcker T, Groeschel S, Schultz T. SHORE-based detection and imputation of dropout in diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 2019; 82:2286-2298. [PMID: 31273856 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Revised: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In diffusion MRI, dropout refers to a strong attenuation of the measured signal that is caused by bulk motion during the diffusion encoding. When left uncorrected, dropout will be erroneously interpreted as high diffusivity in the affected direction. We present a method to automatically detect dropout, and to replace the affected measurements with imputed values. METHODS Signal dropout is detected by deriving an outlier score from a simple harmonic oscillator-based reconstruction and estimation (SHORE) fit of all measurements. The outlier score is defined to detect measurements that are substantially lower than predicted by SHORE in a relative sense, while being less sensitive to measurement noise in cases of weak baseline signal. A second SHORE fit is based on detected inliers only, and its predictions are used to replace outliers. RESULTS Our method is shown to reliably detect and accurately impute dropout in simulated data, and to achieve plausible results in corrupted in vivo dMRI measurements. Computational effort is much lower than with previously proposed alternatives. CONCLUSIONS Deriving a suitable outlier score from SHORE results in a fast and accurate method for detection and imputation of dropout in diffusion MRI. It requires measurements with multiple b values (such as multi-shell or DSI), but is independent from the models used for analysis (such as DKI, NODDI, deconvolution, etc.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Koch
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.,Department of Computer Science, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Andrei Zhukov
- Department of Computer Science, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tony Stöcker
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Samuel Groeschel
- Department of Child Neurology, University Children's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Schultz
- Department of Computer Science, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Bonn-Aachen International Center for Information Technology, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|