Sweet syndrome-like eruption with prominent dermal leukocytoclasis associated with systemic lupus erythematosus

Insights Into the Pathogenesis of Sweet's Syndrome

Sweet's syndrome, also known as Acute Febrile Neutrophilic Dermatosis, is a rare inflammatory condition. It is considered to be the prototype disease of neutrophilic dermatoses, and presents with acute onset dermal neutrophilic lesions, leukocytosis, and pyrexia. Several variants have been described both clinically and histopathologically. Classifications include classic Sweet's syndrome, malignancy associated, and drug induced. The cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in Sweet's syndrome have been difficult to elucidate due to the large variety of conditions leading to a common clinical presentation. The exact pathogenesis of Sweet's syndrome is unclear; however, new discoveries have shed light on the role of inflammatory signaling, disease induction, and relationship with malignancy. These findings include an improved understanding of inflammasome activation, malignant transformation into dermal infiltrating neutrophils, and genetic contributions. Continued investigations into effective treatments and targeted therapy will benefit patients and improve our molecular understanding of inflammatory diseases, including Sweet's syndrome.

Lymphocytes in Sweet syndrome: A potential diagnostic pitfall

BACKGROUND

Patients with Sweet syndrome (SS) have acute onset of cutaneous lesions with characteristic histopathology (dense and diffuse neutrophilic infiltrate, dermal edema, leukocytoclasis and no vasculitis) accompanied by systemic symptoms. Sometimes, only skin lesions with classic histopathologic features are seen. Although SS is considered to be a "neutrophilic dermatosis," lymphocytes are also seen on histological examination.

METHODS

We evaluated the cellular infiltrate in 9 biopsies from SS lesions with routine staining and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Lymphocytes were present in all biopsies in variable amounts, often exceeding the number of intact neutrophils. Prominent fragmentation of neutrophils rendered some biopsies "lymphocyte-rich" on routine histologic evaluation. Myeloperoxidase was helpful in highlighting the inconspicuous neutrophilic fragments in these cases. Lymphocytes were highlighted with immunohistochemistry, and had a CD3+, CD4+, CD20(-) immunophenotype, with rare CD8+ lymphocytes.

CONCLUSION

Awareness of the lymphocytic component of SS is important to avoid diagnostic errors, especially in subcutaneous lesions of SS, in which the lymphocytic infiltrate predominates in the upper parts of the dermis, while the typical neutrophilic infiltrate may be seen only in the deeper dermis and subcutis. The lymphocytic component may potentially help to differentiate lesions of SS from neutrophilic urticarial dermatosis, which has not been reported to contain a significant lymphocytic population.