Safety and efficacy of adalimumab treatment in Japanese patients with psoriasis: Results of SALSA study

English version of Japanese guidance for use of biologics for psoriasis (the 2022 version)

This is the English version of Japanese guidance for use of biologics for psoriasis (the 2022 version). As the first biologics for psoriasis in Japan, infliximab and adalimumab, anti-tumor necrosis factor-α antibodies, became available in the field of dermatology in 2010, followed by ustekinumab, an anti-interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23p40 antibody, which was launched in Japan in 2011. Moreover, after 2015, three IL-17 inhibitors, the IL-17A antibody preparations secukinumab and ixekizumab, and an anti-IL-17 receptor antibody preparation brodalumab were marketed. Furthermore, after 2018, the anti-IL23p19 antibody preparations guselkumab and risankizumab, the TNF inhibitor certolizumab pegol, the IL-23 inhibitor tildrakizumab, and the anti-IL-17A/F antibody bimekizumab were marketed. It is important for physicians to select appropriate biologic therapy for each psoriatic patient after due consideration of disease factors, treatment factors, and patient background factors, sharing such information with patients. The followings can be listed as points to be considered for the selection of biologics: drug effects (e.g., strength of effectiveness, time to onset of effectiveness, effectiveness against arthritis, primary failure, secondary failure), safety (e.g., infections, administration-related reactions, and relationships with other comorbidities), convenience for patients (e.g., hospital visit intervals, self-injection, maintenance therapy at clinics, feasibility of drug discontinuation/re-administration), and payment (medical costs) borne by patients. This guidance has been prepared with the aim of allowing dermatologists experienced in the treatment of psoriasis to use biologics appropriately according to the circumstances of individual patients after consideration of the above-mentioned factors.

Active Tuberculosis in a Patient Receiving Adalimumab for Psoriatic Arthritis and Chemoprophylaxis for Latent Tuberculosis Infection

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, including adalimumab, are widely used to treat refractory psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Although isoniazid chemoprophylaxis is generally effective in preventing reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), prophylactic measures do not fully protect against development of active tuberculosis. We report a rare case of active tuberculosis despite chemoprophylaxis for LTBI in a patient receiving adalimumab for PsA. A 60-year-old Japanese woman who had received a diagnosis of psoriasis at age 35 years presented with arthralgia of the right hand, which she first noticed 2 months previously. Physical examination showed scattered erythematous papules and plaques with scales on her trunk, extremities, and scalp. Her right metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints were swollen and painful, and her right wrist and elbow were painful. PsA was diagnosed and adalimumab was initiated. Because an interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) showed a borderline result at screening, isoniazid was administered as chemoprophylaxis for LTBI. At 22 months after initiation of adalimumab, IGRA was positive and chest CT disclosed centrilobular nodules in both lungs and swelling of multiple lymph nodes. Culture of sputum at 24 months demonstrated Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Active tuberculosis was diagnosed, and treatment with a combination of isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol hydrochloride, and pyrazinamide was started. To ensure timely diagnosis and treatment of active tuberculosis, a tuberculosis expert should be consulted at an early stage, with regular screening and monitoring.

Racial/ethnic differences in treatment efficacy and safety for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a systematic review

Biologic medications have revolutionized treatment of psoriasis; however, there remains uncertainty in which medications should be used to maximize efficacy based on race/ethnicity. The purpose was to determine if efficacy of biological medications differs based on race/ethnicity. A systematic review identified all clinical trials focused on biologic treatment outcomes from inception of database until March 5th, 2021. Included studies provided data on racial/ethnic differences in biologic skin clearance efficacy using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and "clear/almost clear" scores. There were 1220 studies identified, and 24 included in the review. The races/ethnicities included were Asian (n = 2740), White (n = 9745), Black (n = 138), and Latino (n = 728). Ixekizumab provided the highest "clear/almost clear" score (90.7%, 89.4%) and PASI 75 (98.8%, 96.6%) for Asian and Latino patients, respectively. Guselkumab had the highest "clear/almost clear" score for White (86.8%) patients, while Black patients had highest "clear/almost clear" (75.0%) and PASI 75 (91.7%) scores to brodalumab. Limitations included lack of studies reporting outcome data based on race/ethnicity and lack of patients of color within psoriasis clinical trials. For treatment of plaque psoriasis, there is evidence of differences in efficacy of biologics improving clinical disease severity between different races or ethnicities.

Utility of the Dermatology Life Quality Index at initiation or switching of biologics in real-life Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis: Results from the ProLOGUE study

BACKGROUND

Plaque psoriasis significantly affects patients' health-related quality of life. To aid treatment decisions, not only objective assessment by physicians but also subjective assessment by patients is important.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the significance of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) evaluation at the time of biologics introduction in clinical practice in Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis.

METHODS

This was a single-arm, open-label, multicenter study. At baseline, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and DLQI scores were measured and stratified based on DLQI scores ≥6/≤5 and PASI scores ≤10/>10. Other patient-reported outcomes assessed included EQ-5D-5L, itch numerical rating scale (NRS), skin pain NRS, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), Sleep Problem Index-II (SPI-II), and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9).

RESULTS

Of the 73 enrolled patients, 23 had PASI scores ≤10. Those with PASI/DLQI scores >10/≥6 had a significantly higher median PASI score than those with PASI/DLQI scores >10/≤5 (p = 0.0125). Regardless of PASI scores (>10/≤10), median itch NRS and GAD-7 scores were significantly higher in patients with DLQI scores ≥6 than in those with DLQI scores ≤5 (itch NRS, p = 0.0361 and p = 0.0086, respectively; GAD-7, p = 0.0167 and p = 0.0273, respectively). Patients with PASI/DLQI scores ≤10/≥6 had significantly higher skin pain NRS (p = 0.0292) and PHQ-8 (p = 0.0255) scores and significantly lower median SPI-II scores (p = 0.0137) and TSQM-9 Effectiveness domain scores (p = 0.0178) than those with PASI/DLQI scores ≤10/≤5.

CONCLUSION

DLQI may be useful for assessing patients' concerns that cannot be identified by PASI alone while initiating biologics or switching from other biologics in clinical practice.

Japanese guidance for use of biologics for psoriasis (the 2019 version)

As the first biologics for psoriasis in Japan, infliximab and adalimumab, anti-tumor necrosis factor-α antibodies, became available in the field of dermatology in 2010, followed by ustekinumab, an anti-interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23p40 antibody, which was launched in Japan in 2011. Since 2015, three IL-17 inhibitors of secukinumab and ixekizumab, anti-IL-17A antibodies, and brodalumab, an anti-IL-17 receptor antibody, and two anti-IL-23p19 antibodies of guselkumab and risankizumab, have also been launched. It is important for physicians to select appropriate biologic therapy for each psoriatic patient after due consideration of disease factors, treatment factors and patient background factors, sharing such information with patients. The following can be listed as points to be considered for the selection of biologics: drug effects (e.g. strength of effectiveness, time to onset of effectiveness, effectiveness against arthritis, primary failure, secondary failure), safety (e.g. infections, administration-related reactions and relationships with other comorbidities), convenience for patients (e.g. hospital visit intervals, self-injection, maintenance therapy at clinics, feasibility of drug discontinuation/re-administration) and payment (medical costs) borne by patients. This guidance has been prepared with the aim of allowing dermatologists experienced in the treatment of psoriasis to use biologics appropriately according to the circumstances of individual patients after consideration of the above-mentioned factors.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in psoriatic patients treated with biologics: Real-world data from 18 Japanese facilities

Although rare, tuberculosis has been reported with biologic treatment against psoriasis in Japan, a tuberculosis medium-burden country. Mycobacterial infection often develops after a long incubation period and might not have been adequately identified in clinical trials or post-marketing surveillance. To determine the real-world incidence of tuberculosis in psoriatic patients treated with biologics, we conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational study in 18 facilities in Western Japan. Psoriatic patients who visited a participating facility between 2010 and March 2017 and received biologic reagents were enrolled. Information on sex, age at first biologic treatment, results of interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, treatment history with isoniazid, and onset of active and/or latent tuberculosis was collected. A total of 1117 patients (830 men and 287 women) were enrolled. The mean duration of biologic treatment was 3.54 years. Sixty-five patients (5.8%) showed positive IGRA results at screening. Active tuberculosis developed in two patients after the administration of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (both involved miliary tuberculosis). Latent tuberculosis was observed in two patients treated with anti-interleukin-12/23p40 antibody. The incidence rate of tuberculosis, including latent tuberculosis, in this survey was 0.36%. Although the incidence rate of tuberculosis was low considering the observation period of biologic treatment, active tuberculosis was found in both the screening-negative group and a screening-positive subject after isoniazid prophylaxis (both miliary tuberculosis), concluding that negative screening or isoniazid treatment does not always assure that an individual has no tuberculosis. Hence, dermatologists still need to pay careful attention to tuberculosis at every patient visit.

A case of psoriatic arthritis, with joint involvement preceding skin involvement, successfully treated with adalimumab (80 mg every other week)

Here we present a 45-year-old male patient who suffered from psoriatic arthritis (PsA), for which adalimumab (80 mg every other week) was effective. Dose escalation of a TNF-α antagonist should be considered for patients showing an inadequate response for disease stabilization in PsA.

Active Tuberculosis in Patients with Psoriasis Receiving Biologic Therapy: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Biologic therapies pose a risk for opportunistic infections, especially for reactivating latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI).

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to describe the clinical features and mortality rate of active Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) in psoriasis patients receiving biologic therapies.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was performed. Studies describing active TB in patients with psoriasis receiving biologic therapy from inception to May 31, 2018 were included. Clinical data as well as mortality rates were recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies were included, evaluating 78 patients with active TB: 11 prospective studies, 13 retrospective, and 27 case reports/series. Most patients (73%) with active TB were male, the mean age was 48 ± 13 years, and 85% were of European or Asian origin. Pre-treatment LTBI screening was negative for 63% of patients. Disease presented in 33% of patients within the first 3 months of treatment, and in 51% within the first 6 months. Most patients (72%) presented with extra-pulmonary TB, and 49% had disseminated disease. The mortality rate was 7%.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations of this review are its small sample size and inclusion of case reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Some patients develop active TB despite LTBI screening. Clinicians initiating biologic therapy in patients with psoriasis should be aware of the clinical features of active TB in this scenario.

Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from the SustaIMM phase 2/3 trial

Risankizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody, selectively inhibits interleukin‐23, a key cytokine in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, by binding to its p19 subunit. In SustaIMM (ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT03000075), a phase 2/3, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled study, Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (n = 171) were stratified by bodyweight and concomitant psoriatic arthritis and randomized 2:2:1:1 to 75 mg risankizumab, 150 mg risankizumab, placebo with cross‐over to 75 mg risankizumab and placebo with cross‐over to 150 mg risankizumab. Dosing was at weeks 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40, with placebo cross‐over to risankizumab at week 16. The primary end‐point was 90% or more improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI‐90) at week 16 for risankizumab versus placebo. Missing data were imputed as non‐response. All primary and psoriasis‐related secondary end‐points were met for both risankizumab doses (P < 0.001). At week 16, PASI‐90 responses were significantly higher in patients receiving 75 mg (76%) or 150 mg (75%) risankizumab versus placebo (2%). Corresponding response rates were 86%, 93% and 10% for static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) score of clear/almost clear; 90%, 95% and 9% for PASI‐75; and 22%, 33% and 0% for PASI‐100, with significantly higher responses for both risankizumab doses versus placebo. Through week 52, PASI and sPGA responses increased or were maintained and treatment‐emergent adverse events were comparable across treatment groups. Both doses of risankizumab were superior to placebo in treating patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The safety profile was consistent with previous risankizumab trials, with no new or unexpected safety findings.

Real-World Postmarketing Study of the Impact of Adalimumab Treatment on Work Productivity and Activity Impairment in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis

Introduction

This study investigated the effectiveness of adalimumab treatment in improving Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in real-world settings in Japan.

Methods

This 24-week, single-arm, postmarketing surveillance study (2014–2017), conducted at 75 centers in Japan, enrolled adalimumab-naïve patients (paid workers, including part-time) meeting ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR). The primary endpoint was improvement in overall work impairment (OWI) scores from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints included changes in WPAI-PsA (OWI, absenteeism, presenteeism, and activity impairment), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), psoriatic arthritis screening and evaluation (PASE) scores, Disease Activity Scores in 28 joints using C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) scores, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores, and PASI75/90 and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 rates.

Results

In the effectiveness population (n = 106; 72.6% men; mean ± standard deviation [SD] age, 49.3 ± 10.7 years), OWI scores significantly improved (mean ± SD change, − 25.2 ± 35.3; p < 0.0001) from baseline to week 24. Other WPAI domain scores also improved significantly. Changes in OWI were significantly correlated (p < 0.0001) with PASE (r = 0.6284), DAS28(CRP) (r = 0.6059), BASDAI (r = 0.7281), and HAQ-DI (r = 0.6161) scores and were significantly influenced by previous nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (p = 0.0142), and baseline PASE (p = 0.0098), DAS28(CRP) (p = 0.0026), HAQ-DI (p = 0.0004), and BASDAI (p < 0.0001) scores. At the last evaluation, rate (95% confidence interval) of PASI 75 and 90 (n = 100) was 58.0% (47.7–67.8) and 39.0% (29.4–49.3), respectively, and that of ACR 20, 50, and 70 (n = 58) was 86.2% (74.6–93.9), 70.7% (57.3–81.9), and 53.4% (39.9–66.7), respectively. No new safety signals were observed in the safety population (n = 148).

Conclusion

Adalimumab treatment improved WPAI in patients with PsA. Improvements in OWI and joint symptoms were significantly associated.

Trial Registration Number

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02414633.

Funding

AbbVie GK and Eisai Co., Ltd.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-018-0866-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Benefit-risk profile of tofacitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis: pooled analysis across six clinical trials

Background

Although existing psoriasis treatments are effective and well tolerated in many patients, there is still a need for new effective targeted treatment options. Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor that has been investigated in patients with moderate‐to‐severe chronic plaque psoriasis.

Objectives

To consider the benefits and risks of tofacitinib in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis.

Methods

Data were pooled from one phase II, four phase III and one long‐term extension study comprising 5204 patient‐years of tofacitinib treatment. Efficacy end points included patients achieving Physician's Global Assessments of ‘clear’ or ‘almost clear’, ≥ 75% and ≥ 90% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (coprimary end points) and improvements in Dermatology Life Quality Index score, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale depression score and Itch Severity Item score, at weeks 16 and 52. Safety data were summarized for 3 years of tofacitinib exposure.

Results

Tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily (BID) showed superiority over placebo for all efficacy end points at week 16, with response maintained for 52 weeks of continued treatment. Tofacitinib improved patients’ quality of life and was well tolerated. Rates of safety events of interest (except herpes zoster) were similar to those in the published literature and healthcare databases for other systemic psoriasis therapies. Tofacitinib 10 mg BID demonstrated greater efficacy than 5 mg BID.

Conclusions

Tofacitinib has a benefit–risk profile in moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis consistent with that of other systemic treatments.

What's already known about this topic?

Psoriasis is a chronic, systemic inflammatory disease, which has a significant impact on patients’ health‐related quality of life.

Although several existing psoriasis treatments are efficacious and well tolerated in many patients, some patients require treatment switching, and a proportion of patients remain untreated or undertreated.

Potential challenges to the use of existing therapies include safety issues and limited efficacy in some patients with conventional oral psoriasis treatments, inconvenience of topical treatments and the requirement for parenteral administration of biologics.

What does this study add?

Consistent efficacy and a safety profile consistent with that seen in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ulcerative colitis were demonstrated for oral tofacitinib in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis.

Tofacitinib has a benefit–risk profile in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis that is consistent with that of other systemic psoriasis treatments.

Linked Comment: Fleming. Br J Dermatol 2019; 180:13–14.

Plain language summary available online

Respond to this article

Adalimumab treatment in Japanese patients with generalized pustular psoriasis: Results of an open-label phase 3 study

A phase 3, multicenter, open-label, 52-week study investigated the efficacy and safety of adalimumab 80 mg at week 0 followed by adalimumab 40 mg every other week (option to escalate to 80 mg when necessary) in Japanese patients with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP). Adults (aged 15-75 years) with GPP, total skin score (overall erythema area, erythema area with pustules, and edema area) of 3 or more, and erythema with pustules (skin score, ≥1) based on the 2014 Japanese Dermatological Association severity index of GPP were enrolled. The primary efficacy end-point was clinical response at week 16 (non-responder imputation), defined as achieving remission (total skin score, 0) or improvement from baseline (reduction of ≥1 point from a baseline total skin score of 3 or ≥2 points from a baseline total skin score of ≥4). Of 10 enrolled patients (mean disease duration, 10.6 years), seven patients, including three with the dose escalated to 80 mg every other week before week 15, achieved clinical response at week 16, and five achieved clinical response at week 52. Mean change from baseline total GPP score was -4.6 at week 16 (n = 8) and -6.0 at week 52 (n = 5); change in total skin score was -3.1 (n = 8) and -4.2 (n = 5), respectively. Nine patients experienced one or more adverse events and three experienced serious adverse events. The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis, pruritus and hypoalbuminemia. In conclusion, adalimumab was effective and well tolerated for up to 52 weeks in the treatment of Japanese patients with GPP.

Differential efficacy of biologic treatments targeting the TNF-α/IL-23/IL-17 axis in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis cause significant physical and psychological burdens for afflicted individuals. An accelerated TNF-α/IL-23/IL-17 axis is their major pathomechanism; therefore, anti-TNF-α/IL-23/IL-17 biologics are very effective for the treatment of skin and joint lesions in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Given that the IL-17 signature is more upregulated in the skin than in synovium in psoriatic arthritis, anti-IL-23/IL-17 agents seem to be superior to anti-TNF-α remedies in the treatment of skin lesions. In this review, we focus on the differential efficacy of anti-TNF-α/IL-23/IL-17 biologics in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

Psoriasis in Skin of Color: Insights into the Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Genetics, Quality-of-Life Impact, and Treatment of Psoriasis in Non-White Racial/Ethnic Groups

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition affecting diverse racial/ethnic groups throughout the world. Large population-based studies suggest that psoriasis occurs most often in individuals of European ancestry, followed by black and Hispanic individuals, although the true prevalence of psoriasis in non-white individuals is likely underestimated. Despite similarities in psoriasis between ethnic groups, there are notable differences in the presentation, quality-of-life impact, and treatment of psoriasis with important implications for the management of non-white individuals. Overall, heterogeneity in psoriasis susceptibility alleles, in combination with cultural and socioeconomic factors, may explain these differences. In this article, we review the epidemiology, clinical presentation, genetic polymorphisms, quality-of-life impact, and treatment nuances of psoriasis in patients with skin of color.

Autoimmunity and autoimmune co-morbidities in psoriasis

Psoriasis is characterized by widespread scaly erythematous plaques that cause significant physical and psychological burdens for the affected individuals. Accelerated inflammation driven by the tumour necrosis factor-α/interleukin-23/interleukin-17 axis is now known to be the major mechanism in the development of psoriasis. In addition, psoriasis has an autoimmune nature that manifests as autoreactive T cells and is co-morbid with other autoimmune diseases, such as autoimmune bullous diseases, vitiligo, alopecia and thyroiditis. In this article, we review the recent topics on autoimmunity and autoimmune co-morbidities in psoriasis.

Efficacy of Secukinumab in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis in the North American Subgroup of Patients: Pooled Analysis of Four Phase 3 Studies

Introduction

Demographic and disease characteristics may impact response to psoriasis therapies. The objective of this study is to explore the safety and efficacy profile of secukinumab in North American (NA) versus non-NA patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

Methods

Data were pooled from four phase 3 studies of secukinumab. Secukinumab (300 and 150 mg) was administered at baseline, weeks 1, 2, and 3, then every 4 weeks from week 4 to 48.

Results

Peak efficacy was observed at week 16 in NA and non-NA patients with secukinumab 300 mg and secukinumab 150 mg, and disease clearance was maintained to week 52. At week 52 with secukinumab 300 mg, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90/100 response was achieved by 62.9%/37.9% of NA patients, respectively, and 70.2%/42.0% of non-NA patients, respectively. At week 52 with secukinumab 150 mg, PASI 90/100 response was achieved by 30.9%/17.5% of NA patients, respectively, and 53.9%/26.9% of non-NA patients, respectively. Response to secukinumab was rapid, and 50% reduction in mean PASI was achieved in both groups after 2.9 weeks with secukinumab 300 mg and 3.7 weeks with secukinumab 150 mg.

Conclusion

Despite differences in baseline characteristics, the efficacy and safety of secukinumab were similar among NA and non-NA patients.

Funding

Novartis Pharma AG.

Plain Language Summary

Plain language summary available for this article.

"Inflammatory skin march" in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Comorbidities of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), metabolic syndrome and autoimmune diseases with systemic inflammation are recent topics in medicine. Inflammatory skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis and psoriasis are an active source of diverse proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, which are readily detectable in the circulation and are likely to be involved in developing comorbidities.

EVIDENCE

Both atopic dermatitis and psoriasis are frequently comorbid with CVD, metabolic syndrome and autoimmune diseases, the consequence of which is called "inflammatory skin march", "psoriatic march" or "march of psoriasis".

CONCLUSION

In this review, we summarize the epidemiological evidence and pathogenetic concepts regarding inflammatory skin march in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis.

Targeting IKK and NF-κB for Therapy

In addition to regulating immune responses, the NF-κB family of transcription factors also promotes cellular proliferation and survival. NF-κB and its activating kinase, IKK, have become appealing therapeutic targets because of their critical roles in the progression of many diseases including chronic inflammation and cancer. Here, we discuss the conditions that lead to pathway activation, the effects of constitutive activation, and some of the strategies used to inhibit NF-κB signaling.

Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases Comorbid with Psoriasis: Beyond the Skin

A close association of systemic inflammation with cardiovascular diseases and metabolic syndrome is recently a popular topic in medicine. Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a prevalence of approximately 0.1-0.5% in Asians. It is characterized by widespread scaly erythematous macules that cause significant physical and psychological burdens for the affected individuals. The accelerated inflammation driven by the TNF-α/IL-23/IL-17A axis is now known to be the major mechanism in the development of psoriasis. Psoriasis is not a mere skin disease; it is significantly associated with cardiovascular diseases and metabolic syndrome, which suggests that the chronic skin inflammation extends the systemic inflammation beyond the skin. In this article, we review the epidemiological and pathological aspects of psoriasis and its comorbidities.

Prokineticin 2 Plays a Pivotal Role in Psoriasis

Psoriasis is histologically characterized by keratinocytes (KC) hyperproliferation, inflammation, and increased angiogenesis, but the pathological factor responsible for these symptoms is unknown. Here, a neuroendocrine peptide (prokineticin 2, PK2), is highly expressed in human and mouse psoriatic skins but no significant change in other autoimmune diseases, suggesting that PK2 is a psoriasis-specific factor. Bacterial products significantly up-regulated PK2, implying that infection induces PK2 over-expression. PK2 promoted KC and macrophage to produce interleukin-1 (IL-1), the central player of inflammation and psoriasis, which acts on adjacent fibroblast to induce inflammatory cascades and KC hyperproliferation. IL-1 feeds back on macrophages to induce PK2 production to perpetuate PK2-IL-1 positive feedback loop. PK2 also promoted angiogenesis, another psoriatic symptom. In mouse models, PK2 over-expression aggravated psoriasis while its knock-down inhibited pathological development. The results indicate that PK2 over-production perpetuates psoriatic symptoms by creating PK-2-IL-1 vicious loop. PK2 is a central player in psoriasis and a promising psoriasis-specific target.

•

High level of PK2 is found in psoriasis but not in other autoimmunity diseases.

•

Bacterial products induce PK2 over-expression to promote IL-1 signal.

•

IL-1 induces PK2 secretion to create a PK2-IL-1 circle to perpetuate symptoms.

•

PK2 is a central player in psoriasis and may be a psoriasis-specific target.

Psoriasis is a common autoimmune disease whose pathogenesis remains poorly understood. We found that PK2 was highly expressed in psoriasis but not in other autoimmune diseases. To investigate the role of PK2 in psoriasis, the effect of PK2 on keratinocyte proliferation, inflammation and angiogenesis were analyzed. PK2 expression mediated by virus in psoriasis was applied. The results demonstrated that PK2 promoted psoriasis development. PK2 over-expression in mouse model aggravates psoriasis while knock-down of PK2 improves the disease. PK2 plays a pivotal role in psoriasis.