Efficacy and safety of secukinumab in Taiwanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Subanalysis from ERASURE phase III study

Formation and clinical effects of anti-drug antibodies against biologics in psoriasis treatment: An analysis of current evidence

BACKGROUND

Formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against biologics is an important cause of psoriasis treatment failure.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to summarize the characteristics of ADAs formation under different biological therapies and the influence of ADAs on the clinical effects and safety of biologics in patients with psoriasis.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception to August 2022. Studies on biologics that assessed ADA levels in patients with psoriasis were included. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) for case-control and cohort studies, and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for single-arm studies. We calculated the pooled incidence with a random-effects model using R software. Subgroup analyses revealed that differences in patient characteristics, disease conditions, study design, and immunoassays may influence ADA generation and detection.

RESULTS

The analysis included 86 studies, with a total population of 42,280 individuals. The pooled ADA rates were 0.49%, 2.20%, 2.38%, 4.08%, 7.38%, 7.94%, 14.29%, 21.93%, 29.70%, 31.76%, and 39.58% for secukinumab, etanercept, brodalumab, ustekinumab, tildrakizumab, guselkumab, ixekizumab, risankizumab, infliximab, adalimumab, and bimekizumab, respectively. >70% (95% CI, 0.71-0.81) of ADAs against adalimumab were neutralizing antibodies, and over 70% of ADAs against secukinumab and brodalumab were transient. Concomitant methotrexate therapy with tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors decreased ADA levels. Lower infliximab doses and intermittent therapy with interleukin (IL)-23 p19 inhibitors increased ADA formation. Additionally, ADA formation under treatment using TNF-α inhibitors and IL-12/23 p40 inhibitors was associated with lower response rates or serum drug levels, but only high ADA titers reduced the clinical effects of IL-17 inhibitors. The occurrence of IL-23 p19 and TNF-α inhibitors has been linked to injection-site reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the 11 biologics, secukinumab, etanercept, and brodalumab resulted in the lowest ADA formation rates. Immunogenicity contributes to lower biological efficacy and a higher likelihood of injection-site reactions. Low doses, intermittent treatment may increase ADA formation. An appropriate biologic should be selected based on the ADA formation rate and course of treatment.

Treatment outcomes of secukinumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in China: A real-world multicenter retrospective study

Secukinumab is effective in treating patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. However, most studies assessing its effectiveness in routine clinical settings in China are mostly single-center studies with a limited sample size. The objective of this study was to assess secukinumab's efficacy, treatment patterns, and characteristics in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. This 24-week, multicenter (n = 5) retrospective study analyzed the data of Chinese adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who initiated secukinumab treatment between May 2019 and March 2020. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), body surface area (BSA), Investigator's Global Assessment Modified 2011 (IGA mod 2011), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were assessed. Dermatologists documented the treatment dosage and modification reasons. Of the 244 secukinumab-naïve patients, most were men (73.4%, 179/244) and weighed 60-90 kg (72.8%, 177/243). The mean (SD) age at secukinumab initiation was 38.1 (11.6) years, and the disease duration was 13.5 (7.9) years. Most patients (97.1%, 237/244) received secukinumab 300 mg. At weeks 4, 12, 16, and 24, the proportion of patients achieving PASI 75 (≥75% reduction from baseline) was 40.0%, 92.1%, 88.4%, and 88.9%, respectively; PASI 90 was 15.0%, 73.7%, 81.4%, and 68.3%, respectively; and PASI 100 was 8.7%, 40.8%, 58.1%, and 41.3%, respectively. During the same periods, BSA and IGA mod 2011 showed similar improvement trends. An increasing proportion of patients achieved DLQI of 0-1 (21.6%, 65.7%, 75.0%, and 80.3%, respectively). Treatment modification was highest at week 12. The average interval between two administrations after week 4 was 62.95 days. Secukinumab was highly effective in improving the PASI, IGA, BSA, and DLQI in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis throughout the first 24 weeks. The treatment pattern for Chinese patients differs from that in the clinical guidelines.

Adverse events associated with anti-IL-17 agents for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a systematic scoping review

Background

Anti-interleukin (IL)-17 biological agents (BAs) have significant efficacy in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis; however, adverse events (AEs) are common, and their safety has not been systematically evaluated.

Objectives

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the number and corresponding rates of AEs caused by anti-IL-17 BAs in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis to improve clinical decision-making regarding their use.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were independently searched by three authors for articles on the treatment of psoriasis with anti-IL-17 BAs that were published before March 1, 2022, and included at least one AE. Dichotomous variables and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were analyzed using R software (version 4.1.3) and the Meta and Metafor software packages. Funnel plots and meta-regression were used to test for the risk of bias, I² was used to assess the magnitude of heterogeneity, and subgroup analysis was used to reduce heterogeneity.

Results

A total of 57 studies involving 28,424 patients with psoriasis treated with anti-IL-17 BAs were included in the meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis showed that anti-IL-17A (73.48%) and anti-IL-17A/F (73.12%) BAs were more likely to cause AEs than anti-IL-17R BAs (65.66%). The incidence of AEs was as high as 72.70% with treatment durations longer than one year, and long-term use of medication had the potential to lead to mental disorders. Infection (33.16%), nasopharyngitis (13.74%), and injection site reactions (8.28%) were the most common AEs. Anti-IL-17 BAs were most likely to cause type α (33.52%) AEs. Type δ AEs (1.01%) were rarely observed.

Conclusions

Anti-IL-17 BAs used for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis caused a series of AEs, but the symptoms were generally mild.

Racial/ethnic differences in treatment efficacy and safety for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a systematic review

Biologic medications have revolutionized treatment of psoriasis; however, there remains uncertainty in which medications should be used to maximize efficacy based on race/ethnicity. The purpose was to determine if efficacy of biological medications differs based on race/ethnicity. A systematic review identified all clinical trials focused on biologic treatment outcomes from inception of database until March 5th, 2021. Included studies provided data on racial/ethnic differences in biologic skin clearance efficacy using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and "clear/almost clear" scores. There were 1220 studies identified, and 24 included in the review. The races/ethnicities included were Asian (n = 2740), White (n = 9745), Black (n = 138), and Latino (n = 728). Ixekizumab provided the highest "clear/almost clear" score (90.7%, 89.4%) and PASI 75 (98.8%, 96.6%) for Asian and Latino patients, respectively. Guselkumab had the highest "clear/almost clear" score for White (86.8%) patients, while Black patients had highest "clear/almost clear" (75.0%) and PASI 75 (91.7%) scores to brodalumab. Limitations included lack of studies reporting outcome data based on race/ethnicity and lack of patients of color within psoriasis clinical trials. For treatment of plaque psoriasis, there is evidence of differences in efficacy of biologics improving clinical disease severity between different races or ethnicities.

Anti-drug antibodies of IL-17 inhibitors for psoriasis: a systematic review

Biologics may elicit the production of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), the clinical significance of which is not fully understood. ADA development in psoriasis patients on IL-17 inhibitors was evaluated by incidence, impact on efficacy, and relationship with adverse events. We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases, identifying 456 references. 17 studies met inclusion criteria. ADA incidence was: 0% to 5.5% (secukinumab), 11% to 19.4% (ixekizumab), 0% to 3.3% (brodalumab), and 19% to 39% (bimekizumab). Neutralizing antibody incidence was: 0% to 1.5% (secukinumab), 0% to 3.5% (ixekizumab), and 0% (brodalumab). ADA presence alone with secukinumab, ixekizumab, and bimekizumab did not impact drug efficacy. Brodalumab was the only one of the IL-17 inhibitors, which showed a reduction in efficacy in ADA + patients. In one analysis, high ADA titers to ixekizumab were associated with diminished treatment response. ADAs to secukinumab and bimekizumab were not associated with adverse events. There were limited data on ADAs and safety with ixekizumab or brodalumab. Overall, when monitoring patients on secukinumab, ADAs, titers, and the presence of neutralizing antibodies were not prognostic of outcomes. However, monitoring for ADAs with brodalumab and measuring titers with ixekizumab may be of value clinically.

Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Adalimumab and Secukinumab for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Single-Center, Real-World Study

Introduction

A growing number of biologics have recently been approved in China for psoriasis treatment, and some of these are eligible for Chinese medical insurance, resulting in a significant increase in the number of patients receiving these biologics. Nevertheless, real-world data on the efficacy and safety of biologics for treating moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Chinese patients are limited, and relevant pharmacoeconomic studies are lacking. Therefore, we performed a prospective, single-center study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) and secukinumab (SEC) in real-world practice. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was also conducted.

Methods

Participants were enrolled between January 2019 and December 2020 at the West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Baseline and follow-up assessments were conducted, and an appropriate statistical analysis was performed.

Results

A total of 183 patients were included. At week 12, the number of patients achieving a psoriasis area and severity index reduction of 75% (PASI 75) with SEC treatment was higher than that with ADA and methotrexate (MTX) (SEC versus ADA versus MTX, 90.59% versus 58.70% versus 17.14%, respectively). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 44.83% and 56.36% of patients in the SEC and ADA groups, respectively. The cost-effectiveness ratio in the SEC group was 46,311.83 Chinese yuan(CNY), compared with 17,580.92 CNY in the ADA group.

Conclusion

In real-world practice, SEC and ADA are effective and safe for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treatment in Chinese patients. On the basis of drug prices during our study period without considering access to health insurance, ADA was more cost-effective in real-world practice.

Plain Language Summary

Adalimumab and secukinumab are two monoclonal antibodies used for the treatment of psoriasis, which target different cytokines in the pathogenesis. A growing number of biologics have recently been approved in China for psoriasis treatment including adalimumab and secukinumab, which are eligible for Chinese medical insurance, resulting in a significant increase in the number of patients receiving these biologics. With the purpose of evaluating its efficacy and safety in the real world, we registered the data of eligible patients in West China Hospital, Sichuan University over the past two years and conducted statistical analysis. In order to provide different therapeutic strategies for patients based on case-specific needs and access to financial resources, we performed pharmacoeconomic analyses to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the two drugs. Our study demonstrated that adalimumab and secukinumab were effective and safe for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Chinese patients in the real-world practice. Based on drug prices during our study period and without taking into consideration access to health insurance, ADA was more cost-effective in real-world practice.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-022-00787-x.

Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and side effects of secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: real-world data from a retrospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Clinical studies have demonstrated that IL-17A inhibition with secukinumab is effective for clearing the skin of patients with psoriasis and has a favorable safety profile.

OBJECTIVE

The authors aim to determine whether secukinumab is effective and safe for the treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic psoriasis based on clinical experience with this drug.

METHOD

The authors conducted a multicenter retrospective study in nine referral centers and included patients with psoriasis who had received secukinumab between March 2018 to November 2020. Data on demographic characteristics, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores, and previous treatments were collected from medical records. Patients were evaluated at 12, 24, and 52 weeks with respect to response to treatment and side effects.

RESULTS

In total, 229 patients were recruited for the study. A PASI score improvement of ≥90 points over the baseline was achieved by 79%, 69.8%, and 49.3% of patients at weeks 12, 24, and 52, respectively. The most common adverse events wereCandida infections and fatigue. In total, 74 (32%) patients discontinued treatment by week 52, including due to adverse events, or secondary ineffectiveness.

STUDY LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that secukinumab therapy is reasonably effective in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Comorbidities and time length of the disease can affect the response to treatment. The rates of adverse events were high in this patient population.

Adverse Effect in Patients with Psoriasis Treated with Interleukin 17A Inhibitor- Secukinumab

Secukinumab is fully human monoclonal antibody, IgG-1κ, which selectively attaches to IL-17A and inhibits its effects, which subsequently leads to a decrease of local inflammatory markers. In 2015 it was approved for treatment of patients suffering from psoriasis. We can say that in comparison with other biologic medicine, such as IL-12/23 inhibitors and TNF-α inhibitors, the incidence rate of serious adverse effects related to use of secukinumab is notably lower. Serious adverse effects reported in relation to use of secukinumab were development of mucocutaneous candidiasis, neutropenia and development or aggravation of the inflammatory bowel disease conditions.

In this review study we focused on frequent adverse effects and adverse effects of special interest during the secukinumab therapy in treating psoriasis patients.

Available data on long-term safety and effects on comorbidities are relatively few. A more extensive and longer term research is needed, as well as critical reevaluation of the criteria for participation in clinical trials in order to obtain data which would be of relevance in clinical practice. A better understanding of adverse effects leads to an improved individual therapeutic approach, increases patient’s satisfaction and results in minimizing these effects.

Comparison of Efficacy of Anti-interleukin-17 in the Treatment of Psoriasis Between Caucasians and Asians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Interleukin-17 (IL-17) monoclonal antibody drugs have been increasingly significant in the treatment of psoriasis, but it is not clear whether the efficacy is equivalent across ethnicities.

Objective

To explore the differences of short-term efficacy of IL-17 inhibitors between Caucasians and Asians.

Methods

The pooled log risk ratio (logRR) between the groups was estimated. The meta-regression analysis on the logRR was performed, with the proportion of Caucasian patients as the covariate. The subgroup analysis was performed by specific IL-17 inhibitors.

Results

Of the 1,569 potentially relevant studies, sixteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. For the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) response at week 12, the pooled logRR of the Asian group and the Caucasian group was 2.81 (95% CI: 2.27–3.35, p < 0.001) and 2.93 (95% CI: 2.71–3.16, p < 0.001), respectively, indicating no significant difference of efficacy between Asians and Caucasians. The meta-regression analysis did not show an association of the proportion of Caucasians with the effect size (β = 0.3203, p = 0.334). In the subgroup analysis, the comparison results of secukinumab were consistent with the main analysis.

Limitations

Only the short-term efficacy was explored. The data from Asian countries were limited.

Conclusions

The short-term efficacy of IL-17 inhibitors in the treatment of psoriasis has no significant difference between Caucasians and Asians.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, identifier CRD42020201994, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Skin and soft tissue infections in biological therapy for psoriasis-A case report and systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Biological therapies are widely used for moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis owing to their high efficacy and safety profile. However, skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) have been reported in association with biological treatment in psoriasis.

METHODS

We report a case of necrotizing fasciitis in an 18-year-old psoriasis patient with a history of severe combined immunodeficiency treated with secukinumab and conducted a systematic literature review of SSTIs associated with biological therapy for psoriasis. The literature review related to biological therapies for psoriasis between the years 1990 and 2020: Medline (PubMed), Embase, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for psoriasis, biological treatment, and skin and soft tissue infections.

RESULTS

Over 1,300 titles were found, 24 of which met the inclusion criteria for our study: nine retrospective studies, nine randomized controlled trials, and six prospective studies. The data covered 10 biological treatments. More than 40,000 patients receiving biological treatment were included, and nearly 1,000 cases of SSTIs were documented.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the available records regarding SSTIs among chronic plaque psoriasis patients given biological treatment. Most reported SSTIs were related to psoriasis patients treated with TNF-α inhibitors. In view of the presented data, biological treatment appears to be a safe mode of therapy for this aspect of psoriasis.

Efficacy and safety of risankizumab vs. secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (IMMerge): results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, efficacy-assessor-blinded clinical trial

Background

Patients with plaque psoriasis treated with biologic therapies need more efficacious, safe and convenient treatments to improve quality of life. Risankizumab and secukinumab inhibit interleukin‐23 and interleukin‐17A, respectively, and are effective in adult patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis but have different dosing regimens.

Objectives

To compare directly the efficacy and safety of risankizumab vs. secukinumab over 52 weeks.

Methods

IMMerge was an international, phase III, multicentre, open‐label, efficacy–assessor‐blinded, active‐comparator study, in which adult patients with chronic, moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis were randomized in a 1 : 1 ratio to treatment with risankizumab 150 mg or secukinumab 300 mg. Primary efficacy endpoints were the proportions of patients achieving ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) at week 16 (noninferiority comparison with margin of 12%) and week 52 (superiority comparison).

Results

In total 327 patients from nine countries were treated with risankizumab (n = 164) or secukinumab (n = 163). Risankizumab was noninferior to secukinumab in the proportion of patients achieving PASI 90 at week 16 [73·8% vs. 65·6%; difference of 8·2%, 96·25% confidence interval (CI)−2·2 to 18·6; within the 12% noninferiority margin] and superior to secukinumab at week 52 (86·6% vs. 57·1%; difference of 29·8%, 95% CI 20·8–38·8; P < 0·001), thus meeting both primary endpoints. All secondary endpoints (PASI 100, static Physician's Global Assessment 0 or 1, and PASI 75) at week 52 demonstrated superiority for risankizumab vs. secukinumab (P < 0·001). No new safety concerns were identified.

Conclusions

At week 52, risankizumab demonstrated superior efficacy and similar safety with less frequent dosing compared with secukinumab.

What is already known about this topic?

The need remains for treatments with sustained efficacy and a more convenient dosing schedule in moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis.

Risankizumab and secukinumab are indicated for the treatment of adults with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis and target interleukin‐23 and interleukin‐17, respectively.

To date, risankizumab and secukinumab have not been directly compared.

What does this study add?

IMMerge directly compared the safety and efficacy of risankizumab and secukinumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis using ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at weeks 16 (noninferiority) and 52 (superiority) as primary endpoints.

In terms of efficacy risankizumab was noninferior to secukinumab at week 16 and superior to secukinumab at week 52 of treatment based on primary endpoint analyses. The two medications had a similar safety profile.

Linked Comment:Schmitt-Egenolf. Br J Dermatol 2021; 184: 3–4.

Plain language summary available online

Crosstalk Among Circadian Rhythm, Obesity and Allergy

The circadian clock system works not only as a cellular time-keeper but also as a coordinator for almost all physiological functions essential to maintaining human health. Therefore, disruptions or malfunctions of this system can cause many diseases and pre-symptomatic conditions. Indeed, previous studies have indicated that disrupted clock gene expression rhythm is closely related to obesity, and that allergic diseases can be regulated by controlling peripheral clocks in organs and tissues. Moreover, recent studies have found that obesity can lead to immune disorders. Accordingly, in this review, we assess the connection between obesity and allergy from the point of view of the circadian clock system anew and summarize the relationships among the circadian clock system, obesity, and allergy.

The seroconversion rate of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test in psoriatic patients receiving secukinumab and ixekizumab, the anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibodies

BACKGROUND

For psoriatic patients receiving biologics, the concern of tuberculosis (TB) infection exists. Although the TB risk of anti-interleukin (IL)-17A agents is generally considered very low, more real-world data are needed to support the safety.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to provide the real-world experience of using serial QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) test among patients treated with secukinumab or ixekizumab in Taiwan, an intermediate TB burden country, for the detection of latent TB infection (LTBI) reactivation or newly acquired TB infection.

METHODS

This retrospective review evaluated 100 consecutive patients with psoriasis receiving anti-IL-17A therapies who were checked with at least twice QFT-GIT between 2016 and 2019 in National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei and Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.

RESULTS

Among the 100 patients, the baseline QFT-GIT results were negative in 81.0% (81/100), positive in 18.0% (18/100), and indeterminate in 1.0% (1/100) of patients. The overall outcomes in patients receiving at least 6 months of cumulative exposure to anti-IL-17A agents were persistently seronegative in 80 patients (80.0%), persistently seropositive in 14 patients (14.0%), seroconversion in 1 patient (1.0%), seroreversion in 3 patients (3.0%), and others in 2 patients (2.0%). In patients with at least 11 months of cumulative exposure, the seroconversion rate was 1.3% (1/79). The only case with seroconversion had a positive QFT-GIT result previously. No case of TB reactivation or newly acquired TB infection was identified during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients treated with anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibodies for psoriasis, routine serial repeat QFT-GIT testing was associated with lower seroconversion rate compared to real-world data of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors and anti-IL-12/23 antibody in Taiwan and in pivotal studies. Because clinical TB symptoms and signs are often preceded by QFT-GIF seroconversion, this result further supports the safety of anti-IL-17A agents in patients with psoriasis for LTBI.

Taiwan Rheumatology Association consensus recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis

Aim

To establish guidelines for the clinical management of axial spondyloarthritis that take into account local issues and clinical practice concerns for Taiwan.

Method

Overarching principles and recommendations were established by consensus among a panel of rheumatology and rehabilitation experts, based on analysis of the most up‐to‐date clinical evidence and the clinical experience of panelists. All Overarching Principles and Recommendations were graded according to the standards developed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, and further evaluated and modified using the Delphi method.

Results

The guidelines specifically address issues such as local medical considerations, National Health Insurance reimbursement, and management of extra‐articular manifestations.

Conclusion

It is hoped that this will help to optimize clinical management outcomes for axial spondyloarthritis in Taiwan.

Consistent responses with guselkumab treatment in Asian and non-Asian patients with psoriasis: An analysis from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2

Guselkumab, an interleukin-23 blocker, was superior to placebo and adalimumab and well-tolerated in phase 3 psoriasis studies (VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2). This analysis evaluated the consistency of response in the Asian subpopulation in VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2. Study designs were identical through week 24; patients were randomized to guselkumab, placebo, or adalimumab. Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), safety, and pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity data from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 were pooled and compared by race (Asian, n = 199; non-Asian, n = 1630). At week 16, treatment differences between guselkumab and placebo were 78.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 66.9-89.6) and 76.4 (95% CI, 72.7-80.2) percentage points for IGA 0/1 (score of 0 or 1) and 70.1 (95% CI, 60.0-80.1) and 68.5 (95% CI, 64.9-72.2) percentage points for PASI 90 (≥90% improvement) in the Asian and non-Asian populations, respectively. Treatment differences between guselkumab and adalimumab were 31.1 (95% CI, 17.7-44.6) and 16.1 (95% CI, 11.2-21.0) percentage points for IGA 0/1 and 24.9 (95% CI, 9.4-40.5) and 23.2 (95% CI, 17.7-28.6) percentage points for PASI 90 in the Asian and non-Asian populations, respectively. Similar results were observed at week 24. Safety was generally similar between populations and among treatment groups. Median serum guselkumab concentrations over time were comparable between the populations. Comparable responses between the Asian and non-Asian populations in this analysis suggest that the overall efficacy, safety, and the resulting benefit/risk analyses from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 are applicable to Asian populations.

Remission Duration and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis Treated by Biologics or Tofacitinib in Controlled Clinical Trials: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

Relapse is common after treatment discontinuation for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. The objective of this study was to understand the remission duration and long-term outcomes in psoriasis patients after biologic withdrawal.

METHODS

We retrospectively included the follow-up data of 184 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis after the end of 11 biologic or tofacitinib trials conducted between 2004 and 2016.

RESULTS

Among the 232 treatment courses, 95 achieved (psoriasis area and severity index) PASI 75 at the end of the studies. At 6 months after treatment discontinuation, the systemic treatment-free rates of our patients who entered the PRESTA, PRISTINE, PEARL, ERASURE, CLEAR, the global tofacitinib study, and the IXORA-P study were 66.7%, 66.7%, 75.0%, 16.7%, 22.2%, 33.3%, and 29.2%, respectively. Pooled data showed a serious adverse event incidence rate of 1.5/100 person-years. The proportions of systemic treatment-free episodes were 16.8%, 7.4%, 4.3%, 3.2%, and 3.2% at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. Biologics were reinitiated in 41.9%, 66.7%, 77.1%, 83.5%, and 86.1% at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. Multivariate generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression analysis demonstrated that predictors for a longer relapse-free duration were baseline PASI, PASI improvement, biologic naivety, and early biologic intervention. Patients who received early biologic intervention, who achieved PASI 90, and who were biologic naive showed significantly higher relapse-free rate by Kaplan-Meier analysis with log rank test.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic treatment was required in 86.1% of patients within 12 months after biologic withdrawal and biologics were reinitiated in 77.1% of patients after 3 years. However, early biologic administration within 2 years after diagnosis demonstrated a lower risk of relapse in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Secukinumab demonstrates superior efficacy and a faster response in clearing skin in Asian subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis compared with ustekinumab: Subgroup analysis from the CLEAR study

The 52-week results from the CLEAR (NCT02074982) study showed high and superior efficacy of secukinumab versus ustekinumab in clearing skin and improving patient-reported outcomes, with comparable safety profile in subjects with moderate to severe psoriasis. Here, we analyzed the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in Asian subjects from the CLEAR study. In this double-blind, phase IIIb study, eligible subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were randomized (1:1) to receive s.c. injection of secukinumab 300 mg or ustekinumab as per label. Of 62 subjects included in Asian subanalyses, 23 were randomized to secukinumab and 39 to ustekinumab. A significantly higher proportion of subjects achieved 90% or more improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) with secukinumab versus ustekinumab at week 16 (78.3% vs 35.9%, P = 0.0010) and at week 52 (60.9% vs 33.3%, P = 0.0196). Similarly, a higher proportion of subjects achieved PASI 100 with secukinumab versus ustekinumab at week 16 (43.5% vs 10.3%, P = 0.0029) and at week 52 (30.4% vs 12.8%, P = 0.0704). The median time to achieve 50% improvement in baseline PASI was 2.8 weeks in the secukinumab group versus 6.3 weeks in the ustekinumab group. The safety profile of secukinumab was in line with the known profile and no deaths occurred. Overall, 95.7% and 84.6% of subjects remained on secukinumab and ustekinumab, respectively. Similar to the core study, secukinumab showed sustained and superior efficacy with faster response versus ustekinumab, and no new or unexpected safety concerns were identified, in Asian subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Effectiveness and safety of secukinumab for psoriasis in real-world practice: analysis of subgroups stratified by prior biologic failure or reimbursement

Background:

Little is known about the treatment outcomes of secukinumab in clinical practice, which differ from those in clinical trials. The effectiveness of biologics may differ in psoriasis patients with previous biologics exposure. The objective of this study was to investigate the real-world effectiveness and safety of secukinumab therapy and analyze subgroups stratified by reimbursement or prior biologic failure.

Methods:

This retrospective multicenter study collected data from a cohort of 118 consecutive patients who received secukinumab treatment between December 2015 and March 2018. Effectiveness was evaluated by degree of improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores. Adverse events and reasons for discontinuation were also recorded.

Results:

The mean PASI improvement rate at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 36 was 63.5%, 77.7%, 78.7%, and 76.0%, respectively. Compared with reimbursed patients, nonreimbursed patients had a significantly lower baseline PASI and a shorter mean disease duration of psoriasis; they were more frequently biologic-naïve, had used less prior traditional antipsoriatic drugs and were more likely to be treated with secukinumab 150 mg. The effectiveness of secukinumab in nonreimbursed patients was superior despite higher discontinuation rates. Compared with patients without prior biologic failure, patients with prior biologic failure had a significantly lower mean PASI improvement at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48. The decline in response rates to secukinumab tended to be more pronounced for patients who failed ustekinumab than tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. Moreover, the number of prior biologic failures was associated with a decreased response rate and increased likelihood of secondary loss of effectiveness of secukinumab therapy.

Conclusion:

In a real-life clinical setting, the characteristics of nonreimbursed patients receiving secukinumab treatment differed from those of reimbursed patients. The PASI improvement for secukinumab was substantial but lower than that in clinical trials. The number and classes of prior biologic failures impact the treatment response to secukinumab.

Risk of herpes zoster with IL-17 inhibitor therapy for psoriasis and other inflammatory conditions

Background: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that has been associated with a significantly higher risk of herpes zoster (HZ). Several newer biologics such as secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab inhibit IL-17 and have been highly effective for treatment of psoriasis. However, adverse events related to the immunosuppressive properties of these biologics have been observed.Methods: This review aims to synthesize and evaluate the literature investigating the risk of HZ in patients treated with IL-17 inhibitors, with a focus on psoriasis patients. We performed searches using the PubMED database with the following search terms: 'psoriasis,' 'herpes zoster,' 'secukinumab,' 'ixekizumab,' 'brodalumab,' 'IL-17,' 'anti-IL-17,' and 'safety.' Clinical trials, cohort studies, review articles, and meta-analyses were evaluated.Results: Studies did not detect a higher risk of HZ infections in psoriasis patients treated with IL-17 inhibitors when compared to those treated with placebo or other therapies. Studies of IL-17 inhibitors for other indications including psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and asthma yielded similar results.Conclusion: IL-17 inhibitors do not appear to increase risk of HZ. However, IL-17 inhibitors are relatively new medications, and further long-term data may be necessary to confirm this finding. Nevertheless, HZ vaccination should be considered on a case-bycase basis prior to initiating IL-17 therapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Brodalumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis and Skin of Color: Results from the Pooled AMAGINE-2/-3 Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND

Data on treatment outcomes in patients with psoriasis who have skin of color are limited. Brodalumab has shown efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and health-related quality of life associated with brodalumab in patients with skin of color participating in two phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled studies (AMAGINE-2/-3).

METHODS

Patients were self-categorized into racial subgroups (black, Asian, or white) or the non-mutually exclusive ethnic subgroup Hispanic/Latino. Patients were randomized to receive brodalumab 210 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or ustekinumab (45 mg in patients weighing ≤ 100 kg and 90 mg in patients weighing > 100 kg) for 52 weeks. Skin clearance was monitored using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were summarized by treatment and racial and ethnic subgroup. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).

RESULTS

During the 12-week induction phase, 613 patients received ustekinumab (black, n = 20; Asian, n = 24; white, n = 551; Hispanic/Latino, n = 68) and 1236 patients received brodalumab 210 mg Q2W (black, n = 36; Asian, n = 39; white, n = 1116; Hispanic/Latino, n = 132). At week 52, a total of 590 patients received continuous ustekinumab (black, n = 19; Asian, n = 23; white, n = 532; Hispanic/Latino, n = 64) and 339 patients were re-randomized to continue receiving brodalumab 210 mg Q2W (black, n = 10; Asian, n = 7; white, n = 308; Hispanic/Latino, n = 40). Among patients who received brodalumab 210 mg Q2W, skin clearance response rates were similar across racial and ethnic subgroups at week 12 and week 52; rates of 75%, 90%, and 100% improvement in PASI from baseline were also higher, as was sPGA score ≤ 1, than in patients who received ustekinumab across all racial and ethnic subgroups. Rates of TEAEs and ≥ 5-point improvement in DLQI score were similar across racial and ethnic subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Brodalumab 210 mg Q2W is well tolerated and efficacious across diverse racial and ethnic subgroups in patients with psoriasis, including black, Asian, white, and Hispanic/Latino patients.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01708603 (AMAGINE-2); NCT01708629 (AMAGINE-3).

Psoriasis and the TNF/IL23/IL17 axis

The excellent response of psoriasis to anti-TNF-α(TNF)/IL23/IL17A biologics implies a crucial role for the TNF/IL23/IL17 axis in developing psoriasis. In addition to the TNF/IL23/IL17 axis provided by immune cells, current evidence points to an important contribution of TNF, IL23 and IL17C produced from non-hematopoietic keratinocytes. Therefore, crosstalk between immune cells and keratinocytes forms a multilayered feed-forward loop to accelerate the TNF/IL23/IL17A axis. Many biologics have already been licensed or are under clinical trials. Given that the IL-17 signature is more upregulated in the skin than in synovium in psoriatic arthritis, anti-IL-23/IL-17 agents seem to be superior to anti-TNF-α remedies in the treatment of skin lesions. In this review, we summarize recent topics in psoriasis and the TNF/IL23/IL17 axis.

Differential efficacy of biologic treatments targeting the TNF-α/IL-23/IL-17 axis in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis cause significant physical and psychological burdens for afflicted individuals. An accelerated TNF-α/IL-23/IL-17 axis is their major pathomechanism; therefore, anti-TNF-α/IL-23/IL-17 biologics are very effective for the treatment of skin and joint lesions in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Given that the IL-17 signature is more upregulated in the skin than in synovium in psoriatic arthritis, anti-IL-23/IL-17 agents seem to be superior to anti-TNF-α remedies in the treatment of skin lesions. In this review, we focus on the differential efficacy of anti-TNF-α/IL-23/IL-17 biologics in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

Psoriasis in Skin of Color: Insights into the Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Genetics, Quality-of-Life Impact, and Treatment of Psoriasis in Non-White Racial/Ethnic Groups

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition affecting diverse racial/ethnic groups throughout the world. Large population-based studies suggest that psoriasis occurs most often in individuals of European ancestry, followed by black and Hispanic individuals, although the true prevalence of psoriasis in non-white individuals is likely underestimated. Despite similarities in psoriasis between ethnic groups, there are notable differences in the presentation, quality-of-life impact, and treatment of psoriasis with important implications for the management of non-white individuals. Overall, heterogeneity in psoriasis susceptibility alleles, in combination with cultural and socioeconomic factors, may explain these differences. In this article, we review the epidemiology, clinical presentation, genetic polymorphisms, quality-of-life impact, and treatment nuances of psoriasis in patients with skin of color.