Rituximab therapy for refractory autoimmune bullous diseases: A multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 1/2 study on 10 Japanese patients

Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review

Background

Pemphigus foliaceus (PF) differs from pemphigus vulgaris (PV) in that it affects only the skin and mucous membranes are not involved. Pemphigus is commonly treated with systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents (ISAs). More recently, biologics have been used. The current literature on biologic therapy often combines treatment of PF with PV, hence it is often difficult for clinicians to isolate the treatment of PF from PV. The purpose of this review was to provide information regarding the use of current biological therapy, specifically in PF.

Materials and methods

A search of PubMed, Embase, and other databases was conducted using keywords pemphigus foliaceus (PF), rituximab (RTX), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), and biologics. Forty-one studies were included in this review, which produced 105 patients with PF, treated with RTX, IVIg, or a combination of both. Eighty-five patients were treated with RTX, eight patients with IVIg, and 12 received both RTX and IVIg.

Results

Most patients in this review had PF that was nonresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapies (CIST), and had significant side effects from their use. RTX treatment resulted in complete remission (CR) in 63.2%, a relapse rate of 39.5%, an infection rate of 19.7%, and a mortality rate of 3.9%. Relapse was greater in the lymphoma (LP) protocol than the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) protocol (p<0.0001). IVIg led to CR in 62.5% of patients, with no relapses or infections. Patients receiving both biologics experienced better outcomes when RTX was first administered, then followed by IVIg. Follow-up durations for patients receiving RTX, IVIg, and both were 22.1, 24.8, and 35.7 months, respectively.

Discussion

In pemphigus foliaceus patients nonresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapy or in those with significant side effects from CIST, RTX and IVIg appear to be useful agents. Profile of clinical response, as well as relapse, infection, and mortality rates in PF patients treated with RTX were similar to those observed in PV patients. The data suggests that protocols specific for PF may produce better outcomes, less adverse effects, and improved quality of life.

B-cell targeted therapy of pemphigus

Pemphigus is an autoimmune disease that causes blistering and erosion of the skin and mucous membranes because of autoantibodies against desmoglein, which plays an important role in adhesion between epidermal keratinocytes. Treatment of pemphigus has long been centered on corticosteroids, and the guidelines for management of pemphigus have recommended high-dose systemic corticosteroids as the first-line treatment. While guideline-based treatment has been shown to be beneficial in patients with pemphigus, it has also become clear that this treatment is accompanied by significant burden and risk. The challenge for future pemphigus treatment is to maximize efficacy while minimizing risk during the course of the disease. In this regard, treatment targeting B cells is expected to become increasingly important as autoreactive B cells in pemphigus patients are thought to play a major role in the production of autoantibodies, which form the basis of the pathogenesis. The recent expansion of insurance coverage to rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against CD20, for refractory pemphigus in the USA, Europe, and Japan has opened up a new era of pemphigus treatment by enabling treatment strategies with drugs targeting B cells in patients. Here, we discuss the current status and future prospects of pemphigus treatment, focusing on rituximab and Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, which are expected to become essential drugs for pemphigus treatment in the future.

Rituximab therapy for intractable pemphigus: A multicenter, open-label, single-arm, prospective study of 20 Japanese patients

This was a multicenter clinical trial of rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal IgG antibody directed against CD20, for the treatment of refractory pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. In total, 20 patients were treated with two doses of rituximab (1000 mg; 2 weeks apart) on days 0 and 14. The primary end point was the proportion of patients who achieved complete or partial remission on day 168 following the first rituximab dose. Of the 20 enrolled patients, 11 (55%) and four (20%) achieved complete and partial remission, respectively; therefore, remission was achieved in a total of 15 patients (75.0% [95% confidence interval, 50.9%-91.3%]). It was demonstrated that the remission rate was greater than the prespecified threshold (5%). In addition, a significant improvement in clinical score (Pemphigus Disease Area Index) and decrease in serum anti-desmoglein antibody level were observed over time. Four serious adverse events (heart failure, pneumonia, radial fracture, and osteonecrosis) were recorded in two patients, of which only pneumonia was considered causally related with rituximab. The level of peripheral blood CD19-positive B lymphocytes was decreased on day 28 after rituximab treatment and remained low throughout the study period until day 168. Our results confirm the efficacy and safety of rituximab therapy for refractory pemphigus in Japanese patients.

Clinical course and outcomes of pemphigus vulgaris and foliaceus: A retrospective study using a nationwide database in Japan

Pemphigus is a life-threatening autoimmune blistering disease. Patient characteristics, treatment courses, and outcomes remain unclear owing to its rarity. To describe the background, treatment, and outcomes of pemphigus, we identified 2598 patients with pemphigus vulgaris and 1186 patients with pemphigus foliaceus from a nationwide inpatient database in Japan. Patients with pemphigus vulgaris were younger (62 vs 72 years, P < 0.001), had fewer comorbidities, and were more likely to be admitted to high-volume hospitals (38% vs 30%, P < 0.001) than those with pemphigus foliaceus. Patients with pemphigus vulgaris had undergone more aggressive treatment, including steroid pulse therapy, intravenous immunoglobulin, or plasmapheresis, compared with those with pemphigus foliaceus (48% vs 42%, P = 0.001); specifically, in patients aged <70 years, the pemphigus vulgaris group was more likely to undergo aggressive treatment than the pemphigus foliaceus group (52% vs 45%), whereas there was no significant difference in patients aged ≥70 years (40% vs 40%). Immunosuppressive agents (30% vs 26%, P = 0.015) and analgesics, including opioids (45% vs 36%, P < 0.001), were used more frequently, whereas topical corticosteroids were used less frequently (32% vs 48%, P < 0.001) in patients with pemphigus vulgaris compared with those with pemphigus foliaceus. In-hospital mortality was lower in patients with pemphigus vulgaris than in those with pemphigus foliaceus (2.2% vs 4.0%, P = 0.002); in the comparison stratified by age, the mortality was equivalent among the two groups (0.6% in patients aged <70 years and 6.1% in those aged ≥70 years). Overall, patients with pemphigus vulgaris had a 10-day longer hospitalization period and higher hospitalization costs than those with pemphigus foliaceus. Our findings provide useful information for understanding the current trends in the management of pemphigus in Japan.

The pathogeneses of pemphigus and pemphigoid diseases

Autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs) are skin disorders which are mainly induced by autoantibodies against desmosomal or hemidesmosomal structural proteins. Previous studies using patients' samples and animal disease models identified target antigens and elucidated the mechanisms of blister formation. Pemphigus has been the subject of more active clinical and basic research than any other AIBD. These efforts have revealed the pathogenesis of pemphigus, which in turn has led to optimal diagnostic methods and novel therapies, such as rituximab. In bullous pemphigoid (BP), studies with passive-transfer mouse models using rabbit anti-mouse BP180 antibodies and studies with passive-transfer or active mouse models using autoantigen-humanized mice elucidated the immune reactions to BP180 in vivo. Recently, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors have attracted attention as a trigger for BP. For epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA), investigations using mouse models are actively under way and several molecules have been identified as targets for novel therapies. In this review, we give an overview and discussion of the recent progress in our understanding of the pathogenesis of pemphigus, BP, and EBA. Further studies on the breakdown of self-tolerance and on the identification of key molecules that are relevant to blister formation may expand our understanding of the etiology of AIBDs and lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

A review of reported infectious events following rituximab therapy in pemphigus patients

Pemphigus is a rare autoimmune blistering condition that used to be fatal before the introduction of corticosteroid (CS) and immunosuppressive agents. Rituximab is a monoclonal anti-CD-20 antibody that induces the pathologic B-cells apoptosis with significant efficacy in the treatment of pemphigus. The application of rituximab can lead to infectious events. We aim to review the reported infectious events in pemphigus patients who previously received rituximab and classify them based on the causative agents. A thorough search of PubMed was conducted using the keywords "rituximab," "pemphigus," "infection," "viral disease," "viral infection," "complication," "efficacy" and their combinations also applying their equivalent Mesh terms and including the references cited in each study. All studies that mentioned at least one infectious event were included. A total of 77 infectious events in 68 patients were reported in the literature out of which the most reported causative agent was viral but the most fatal one found to be bacterial. Although rituximab therapy has shown promising results in controlling pemphigus patients mainly the refractory cases, given possible fatal outcomes, we believe the medical profile of the patients before initiating the therapy warrants careful examination to search for any risk factors or predisposing conditions.

Evaluating the risk-to-benefit ratio of using cotrimoxazole as a pneumocystis pneumonia preventative intervention among pemphigus patients treated with rituximab: A retrospective study with 494 patients

Rituximab is widely used as the first-line treatment for pemphigus patients. Since it depletes the B cells, it increases the risk of infections. Here, we evaluated the prophylactic efficacy of cotrimoxazole in decreasing the risk of pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) infection in the pemphigus patients treated with rituximab. The medical records of confirmed pemphigus patients receiving rituximab were evaluated in two groups; those who received cotrimoxazole as a prophylactic after rituximab and patients who only received rituximab without any prophylaxis. The occurrence of PCP infection was determined in each group and compared. Medical records of 494 patients, including 301 women and 193 men, with the mean age of 46.74 years were analyzed. The phenotypes of the disease were mucocutaneous (n = 364), mucosal (n = 88), and cutaneous (n = 42). Among them, 235 cases had received cotrimoxazole as a prophylaxis and 259 patients did not. The incidence of PCP in total patients was 2 (0.4%), one in each group. Accordingly, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of PCP between two groups (p = 0.84). Also, no cotrimoxazole-related side effect was observed in the treated group. It seems that due to the low incidence of PCP in pemphigus patients treated with rituximab, prophylactic cotrimoxazole therapy is not necessary and it only increases the overall therapy cost and might cause cotrimoxazole-related adverse effects in some patients. However, regarding its probable beneficial effect in patients with long-term history of immunosuppressive therapy, more studies are required.

Vesiculobullous disease with Cutaneous Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treated by Rituximab: A case report

Vesiculobullous lesions in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are a rare cutaneous manifestation of cutaneous and/or systemic LE with variable presentation. The diagnosis of SLE-associated vesiculobullous diseases remains challenging, due to the poorly defined similarities and nosology in immunohistopathological and clinical and features.

A multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled, single-arm phase 2 study of tirabrutinib, an oral Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in pemphigus

BACKGROUND

The treatment of pemphigus is based on systemic corticosteroid use and adjuvant therapies, but some patients are resistant to conventional therapy. Tirabrutinib is a highly selective oral Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor that may be clinically effective in treating pemphigus by suppressing B-cell signaling.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the efficacy and safety of tirabrutinib in patients with refractory pemphigus.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase 2 study of Japanese patients with refractory pemphigus receiving appropriate treatment with an oral corticosteroid and adjuvant therapies. Patients received postprandial oral tirabrutinib 80 mg once daily for 52 weeks. After 16 weeks of tirabrutinib treatment, the corticosteroid dose was tapered to ≤10 mg/day of prednisolone equivalent.

RESULTS

In total, 16 patients were evaluated (mean age, 52.5 years; 50 % male). The complete remission rate after 24 weeks of treatment (primary endpoint) was 18.8 % (3/16; 95 % confidence interval, 6.6 %-43.0 %). By Week 52, eight patients (50.0 %) achieved complete remission and 10 patients (62.5 %) achieved remission. Over 52 weeks of treatment, the mean prednisolone dose decreased from 17.03 to 7.65 mg/day. Incidences of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions were 87.5 % and 43.8 %, respectively. A relationship with tirabrutinib was ruled out for all serious AEs and Grade ≥3 AEs.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with tirabrutinib enabled remission and reduced oral corticosteroid exposure over time and did not result in any major safety concerns in patients with refractory pemphigus. Thus, oral tirabrutinib may be a new treatment option for patients with refractory pemphigus.

Rituximab Therapy for Treatment of Pemphigus in Southeast Asians

Background

Rituximab provides more effective and less adverse effects than the standard dose of corticosteroids, but evidence on its efficacy and safety in the Thai population is lacking.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in the treatment of pemphigus and also to determine prognostic factors linked to the treatment outcomes.

Methods

Pemphigus patients who received rituximab from November 2017 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The outcome was evaluated by using early (end of consolidation phase [ECP]) and late endpoints (complete remission [CR] on/off therapy, immunological remission [IR], and relapse). Adverse events were noted. Prognostic factors associated with remission and relapse were analyzed.

Results

Of 53 pemphigus patients, all attained ECP within 1.61 months. Almost 80% achieved CR on therapy within a median time of 6.36 months, while 33.9% reached CR off therapy in 19.74 months. Nearly half had IR within a median time of 6.88 months. Relapse occurred in 33.3% with a median time of 14 months. In multivariate analysis, receiving rituximab within 12 months of disease duration was more likely to achieve CR off therapy and IR (hazard ratio [HR] 3.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38, 10.42; P = 0.01 and HR 2.74; 95% CI 1.12, 6.69; P = 0.027, respectively), whereas older patients and positive anti-desmoglein 1 levels at the time of CR were predictive indicators for relapse (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.01, 1.13; P = 0.036 and HR 4.38; 95% CI 1.24, 15.46; P = 0.022, respectively). The treatment-related adverse effects occurred in 33.9%.

Conclusion

Rituximab is effective and safe in Thai pemphigus patients. Early administration of rituximab was a predictor of clinical and immunological remission. Older age and persistently positive anti-Dsg1 were correlated with disease relapse.

Myasthenia Gravis With Antibodies Against Muscle Specific Kinase: An Update on Clinical Features, Pathophysiology and Treatment

Muscle Specific Kinase myasthenia gravis (MuSK-MG) is an autoimmune disease that impairs neuromuscular transmission leading to generalized muscle weakness. Compared to the more common myasthenia gravis with antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR), MuSK-MG affects mainly the bulbar and respiratory muscles, with more frequent and severe myasthenic crises. Treatments are usually less effective with the need for prolonged, high doses of steroids and other immunosuppressants to control symptoms. Under physiological condition, MuSK regulates a phosphorylation cascade which is fundamental for the development and maintenance of postsynaptic AChR clusters at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). Agrin, secreted by the motor nerve terminal into the synaptic cleft, binds to low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4) which activates MuSK. In MuSK-MG, monovalent MuSK-IgG4 autoantibodies block MuSK-LRP4 interaction preventing MuSK activation and leading to the dispersal of AChR clusters. Lower levels of divalent MuSK IgG1, 2, and 3 antibody subclasses are also present but their contribution to the pathogenesis of the disease remains controversial. This review aims to provide a detailed update on the epidemiological and clinical features of MuSK-MG, focusing on the pathophysiological mechanisms and the latest indications regarding the efficacy and safety of different treatment options.