Guselkumab improves joint pain in patients with pustulotic arthro-osteitis: A retrospective pilot study

Treatment and monitoring of SAPHO syndrome: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Synovitis acne pustulosis hyperostosis osteitis (SAPHO) is a rare heterogeneous disease of unknown aetiopathology. Externally validated and internationally agreed diagnostic criteria or outcomes and, as a result, prospective randomised controlled trials in SAPHO are absent. Consequently, there is no agreed treatment standard. This study aimed to systematically collate and discuss treatment options in SAPHO.

METHODS

Following 'Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses' guidance, a systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Prospective clinical studies and retrospective case collections discussing management and outcomes in SAPHO involving five or more participants were included. Articles not published in English, studies not reporting defined outcomes, and studies solely relying on patient-reported outcomes were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 28 studies (20 observational, 8 open-label clinical studies) reporting 796 patients of predominantly European ethnicity were included. Reported therapies varied greatly, with many centres using multiple treatments in parallel. Most patients (37.1%) received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs alone or in combination. Bisphosphonates (22.1%), conventional (21.7%) and biological (11.3%) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were the next most frequently reported treatments. Reported outcomes varied and delivered mixed results, which complicates comparisons. Bisphosphonates demonstrated the most consistent improvement of osteoarticular symptoms and were associated with transient influenza-like symptoms. Paradoxical skin reactions were reported in patients treated with TNF inhibitors, but no serious adverse events were recorded. Most treatments had limited or mixed effects on cutaneous involvement. A recent study investigating the Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib delivered promising results in relation to skin and nail involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

No single currently available treatment option sufficiently addresses all SAPHO-associated symptoms. Variable, sometimes descriptive outcomes and the use of treatment combinations complicate conclusions and treatment recommendations. Randomised clinical trials are necessary to generate reliable evidence.

Efficacy and safety of guselkumab and adalimumab for pustulotic arthro-osteitis and their impact on peripheral blood immunophenotypes

OBJECTIVES

We compared the treatment effectiveness between guselkumab and adalimumab in patients with pustulotic arthro-osteitis (PAO). In addition, we performed peripheral blood immunophenotyping to elucidate the immunological background and analyzed the impact of therapeutic drugs to verify the validity of immunological phenotypes as therapeutic targets.

METHODS

Patients were treated with guselkumab 100 mg (guselkumab group; n = 12) and adalimumab 40 mg (adalimumab group; n = 13). Arthritis disease activity, skin lesion activity, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were evaluated and compared between the two groups. The retention rate and adverse events were evaluated. Comprehensive phenotyping of peripheral immune cells was performed in both groups, and phenotypes were compared before and after treatment.

RESULTS

At 6 months, both groups showed significant improvement in arthritis disease activity and PROs. In the guselkumab group, skin symptoms significantly improved. The 6-month continuation rates were 91.7% (11/12) and 69.2% (9/13) in the guselkumab and adalimumab groups, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 2/12 and 5/13 patients in the guselkumab (16.7%) and adalimumab (38.5%) groups, respectively. Peripheral blood immunophenotyping showed that the proportion of activated T helper (Th) 1 cells was significantly lower in patients with PAO than in healthy controls and that the proportion of activated Th17 cells was significantly higher in patients with PAO, which significantly decreased after treatment with guselkumab.

CONCLUSION

Although guselkumab and adalimumab have comparable efficacy for PAO, their impact on immunophenotypes varies.

Guselkumab for the Treatment of Palmoplantar Pustulosis: A Japanese Perspective

Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic inflammatory disorder characterized by sterile pustules predominantly involving the palms and soles. PPP is refractory to various therapies such as topical ointment, oral medicine, and phototherapies. Pustulotic arthro-osteitis (PAO) is a major comorbidity of PPP that severely impairs patients’ quality of life. Recently, guselkumab, a monoclonal antibody against IL-23, has been available for the treatment of PPP in Japan. The purpose of the present review is to describe the characteristics of Japanese PPP patients and biologic therapy of PPP/PAO using guselkumab. Most Japanese dermatologists consider PPP as a distinct entity and co-existence of PPP and psoriasis is rare. However, outside Japan, PPP is often considered to be palmoplantar psoriasis, and extra-palmoplantar lesions associated with PPP are regarded as psoriasis. PPP develops or exacerbates either with or without arthralgia, following focal infections, such as tonsillitis, odontogenic infection, and sinusitis. Treatment of focal infection results in dramatic effects on cutaneous lesions as well as joint pain. By contrast, we sometimes see patients whose skin/joint symptoms do not improve after treatment of focal infection, whose focus of infection cannot be identified even in a detailed examination, and/or who refuse tonsillectomy even if strongly recommended. Such cases are considered to be indications of biologics. In this review, clinical features, pathophysiology and guselkumab therapy are discussed.