Background factors predicting the occurrence of herpes zoster in atopic dermatitis patients treated with upadacitinib

Effectiveness and safety of deucravacitinib treatment for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in real-world clinical practice in Japan

BACKGROUND

Deucravacitinib is a selective oral tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor recently approved for psoriasis.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of deucravacitinib for psoriasis.

METHODS

We analyzed 33 Japanese patients with psoriasis (23 with plaque psoriasis, eight with psoriatic arthritis, and two with erythrodermic psoriasis) from January 2023 to October 2023. All patients received deucravacitinib 6 mg daily until week 16.

RESULTS

At week 8, 12, or 16, the achievement rate of PASI 75 was 60.9%, 73.9%, or 78.3%, that of PASI 90 was 13.0%, 39.1%, or 52.2%, that of PASI 100 was 0%, 8.7%, or 13.0%, that of absolute PASI ≤2 was 34.8%, 65.2%, or 78.3%, respectively. The achievement rate of dermatology life quality index 0/1 at week 16 was 42.9%. Fourteen patients (42%) complained pruritus. Peak pruritus-numerical rating scale in patients with pruritus decreased by median [interquartile] 71.4 [50-80] % of baseline at week 2. Adverse events occurred in 18.2% of patients, which were mild and manageable.

CONCLUSIONS

Deucravacitinib for patients with psoriasis was well-tolerated and gave favorable therapeutic effects in the real-world practice. Deucravacitinib treatment rapidly reduced pruritus.

Predictive factors for responders to upadacitinib treatment in patients with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Janus kinase 1 inhibitor upadacitinib is therapeutically effective for atopic dermatitis (AD). However, predictive factors for high responders to upadacitinib have not been established in real-world clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

To identify predictive factors for responders to upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg, defined as achievers of investigator's global assessment (IGA) 0/1 with ≥ 2-point improvement from basal IGA.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted from August 2021 to July 2023 on 159 AD patients treated with upadacitinib 15 mg and 52 patients with 30 mg. Patients in each group were categorized into responders (achievers of IGA 0/1 at week 12) and non-responders (non-achievers). We compared baseline values of clinical and laboratory parameters between responders and non-responders. Logistic regression analysis was used to detect variables predicting responders. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were used for evaluating prediction capabilities of the variables.

RESULTS

In logistic regression analysis, responders to 15 mg upadacitinib were associated with lower total EASI and higher age whereas responders to 30 mg were associated with lower LDH and lower IgE.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower total EASI and higher age may predict responders to upadacitinib 15 mg while lower IgE and lower LDH may predict responders to 30 mg.

Post-marketing safety concerns with abrocitinib: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

Abrocitinib was newly approved for treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. The present study was to assess abrocitinib-related adverse events (AEs) using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

METHODS

Disproportionality analyses, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms, were employed to quantify the signals of abrocitinib-related AEs.

RESULTS

A total of 3,177,744 reports of AEs were collected from the FAERS database, of which 1370 reports were identified with abrocitinib as the primary suspect drug. Abrocitinib-induced adverse events (AEs) occurred across 27 system organ classes (SOCs). A total of 68 preferred terms (PTs) with significant disproportionality, meeting the criteria of all four algorithms simultaneously, were identified. Unexpected significant AEs, such as increased blood cholesterol, venous embolism, hypoacusis, cellulitis, and tuberculosis, might also occur. The median onset time for abrocitinib-associated AEs was 182 days (interquartile range [IQR] 47-527 days).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study were consistent with clinical observations. Additionally, unexpected safety signals for abrocitinib were identified, which provided supportive information for the safety profile of abrocitinib. Prospective clinical studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Abrocitinib-associated adverse events: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FAERS database

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease. Janus kinase (JAK) modulates cytokines involved in AD pathophysiology, and JAK inhibitors have emerged as effective pharmacotherapeutic remedies for AD. Abrocitinib, an oral selective inhibitor of JAK1, is indicated for the management of moderate-to-severe AD. The current study evaluated the adverse events (AEs) associated with abrocitinib in a real-world setting.

METHODS

To quantify the signals of abrocitinib-associated AEs, we used the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for this pharmacovigilance study with two established pharmacovigilance methods.

RESULTS

A total of 1071 AEs of abrocitinib were investigated as the primary suspected from the FAERS to detect and characterize relevant safety signals. The analysis revealed 85 signals for abrocitinib. The most common AE for abrocitinib was drug ineffective. The signal strength of eczema herpeticum was 515.87 (277.80-957.98) and 510.59 (5148.65) and exhibited the highest strength for abrocitinib. Rare AEs such as aggravated condition, pruritus, and hypersensitivity were not listed on the label, and attention to these AEs is required.

CONCLUSION

The analysis of the AE signals may provide support for clinical monitoring and risk identification of abrocitinib.

Editorial: Extending upadacitinib induction dosing in ulcerative colitis-A delicate balance of efficacy and safety

This article is linked to Panaccione et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17816 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17853

Effectiveness of switching from baricitinib 4 mg to upadacitinib 30 mg in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a real-world clinical practice in Japan

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic eczematous disease with severe pruritus. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, upadacitinib, baricitinib, and abrocitinib, are systemic treatments for AD. The outcomes of switching from one JAK inhibitor to another have not been examined.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the outcomes of switching from baricitinib 4 mg to upadacitinib 30 mg in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

Twenty patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg, showing insufficient response or adverse events, were switched to treatment with upadacitinib 30 mg. We evaluated total eczema area and severity index (EASI), EASI at head and neck, trunk, upper, or lower limbs, EASI of erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, or lichenification, and peak pruritus numerical-rating scale (PP-NRS) at baseline (start of baricitinib), weeks 0 (time of switching), and 4 and 12 after switching.

RESULTS

Total EASI, EASI at each anatomical site, EASI of each clinical sign, and PP-NRS were markedly reduced at weeks 4 or 12 compared to week 0. Achievement rates of more than 75% or 90% reduction of EASI from baseline significantly improved after switching.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from baricitinib 4 mg to upadacitinib 30 mg effectively improved rash and pruritus.