Cumulative effects of spruce budworm and moose herbivory on boreal forest ecosystems

Integrating Network and Meta-Ecosystem Models for Developing a Zoogeochemical Theory

Human activities have caused significant changes in animal abundance, interactions, movement and diversity at multiple scales. Growing empirical evidence reveals the myriad ways that these changes can alter the control that animals exert over biogeochemical cycling. Yet a theoretical framework to coherently integrate animal abundance, interactions, movement and diversity to predict when and how animal controls over biogeochemical cycling (i.e., zoogeochemistry) change is currently lacking. We present such a general framework that provides guidance on linking mathematical models of species interaction and diversity (network theory) and movement of organisms and non-living materials (meta-ecosystem theory) to account for biotic and abiotic feedback by which animals control biogeochemical cycling. We illustrate how to apply the framework to develop predictive models for specific ecosystem contexts using a case study of a primary producer-herbivore bipartite trait network in a boreal forest ecosystem. We further discuss key priorities for enhancing model development, data-model integration and application. The framework offers an important step to enhance empirical research that can better inform and justify broader conservation efforts aimed at conserving and restoring animal populations, their movement and critical functional roles in support of ecosystem services and nature-based climate solutions.

Strong above-ground impacts of a non-native ungulate do not cascade to impact below-ground functioning in a boreal ecosystem

1. Experimental studies across biomes demonstrate that herbivores can have significant effects on ecosystem functioning. Herbivore effects, however, can be highly variable with studies demonstrating positive, neutral or negative relationships between herbivore presence and different components of ecosystems. Mixed effects are especially likely in the soil, where herbivore effects are largely indirect mediated through effects on plants. 2. We conducted a long-term experiment to disentangle the effects of non-native moose in boreal forests on plant communities, nutrient cycling, soil composition and soil organism communities. 3. To explore the effect of moose on soils, we conduct separate analyses on the soil organic and mineral horizons. Our data come from 11 paired exclosure-control plots in eastern and central Newfoundland, Canada that provide insight into 22-25 years of moose herbivory. We fit piecewise structural equations models (SEM) to data for the organic and mineral soil horizons to test different pathways linking moose to above-ground and below-ground functioning. 4. The SEMs revealed that moose exclusion had direct positive impacts on adult tree count and an indirect negative impact on shrub percent cover mediated by adult tree count. We detected no significant impact of moose on soil microbial C:N ratio or net nitrogen mineralization in the organic or mineral soil horizon. Soil temperature and moisture, however, was more than twice as variable in the presence (i.e. control) than absence (i.e. exclosure) of moose. Overall, we observed clear impacts of moose on above-ground forest components with limited indirect effects below-ground. Even after 22-25 years of exclusion, we did not find any evidence of moose impacts on soil microbial C:N ratio and net nitrogen mineralization. 5. Our long-term study and mechanistic path analysis demonstrates that soils can be resilient to ungulate herbivore effects despite evidence of strong effects above-ground. Long-term studies and analyses such as this one are relatively rare yet critical for reconciling some of the context-dependency observed across studies of ungulates effects on ecosystem functions. Such studies may be particularly valuable in ecosystems with short growing seasons such as the boreal forest.