1
|
Ellsworth WH, Peacor SD, Chandler RB, Conner LM, Garrison EP, Miller KV, Cherry MJ. Measuring the benefit of a defensive trait: Vigilance and survival probability. Ecology 2024; 105:e4429. [PMID: 39350526 DOI: 10.1002/ecy.4429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 11/05/2024]
Abstract
Defensive traits are hypothesized to benefit prey by reducing predation risk from a focal predator but come at a cost to the fitness of the prey. Variation in the expression of defensive traits is seen among individuals within the same population, and in the same individual in response to changes in the environment (i.e., phenotypically plastic responses). It is the relative magnitude of the cost and benefit of the defensive trait that underlies the defensive trait expression and its consequences to the community. However, whereas the cost has received much attention in ecological research, the benefit is seldom examined. Even in a defensive trait as extensively studied as vigilance, there are few studies of the purported benefit of the behavior, namely that vigilance enhances survival. We examined whether prey vigilance increased survival and quantified that benefit in a natural system, with white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) experiencing unmanipulated levels of predation risk from Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi). Deer that spent more time vigilant (as measured by head position using camera trap data) had a higher probability of survival. Indeed, an individual deer that was vigilant 75% of the time was more than three times as likely to be killed by panthers over the course of a year than a deer that was vigilant 95% of the time. Our results therefore show that within-population variation in the expression of a defensive trait has profound consequences for the benefit it confers. Our results provide empirical evidence supporting a long-held but seldom-tested hypothesis, that vigilance is a behavior that reduces the probability of predation and quantifies the benefit of this defensive trait. Our work furthers an understanding of the net effects of a trait on prey fitness and predator-prey interactions, within-population variation in traits, and predation risk effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Ellsworth
- Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Scott D Peacor
- Michigan State University, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Richard B Chandler
- University of Georgia, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, Athens, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Elina P Garrison
- Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Karl V Miller
- University of Georgia, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, Athens, Georgia, USA
| | - Michael J Cherry
- Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Kingsville, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abernathy HN, Crawford DA, Chandler RB, Garrison EP, Conner LM, Miller KV, Cherry MJ. Rain, recreation and risk: Human activity and ecological disturbance create seasonal risk landscapes for the prey of an ambush predator. J Anim Ecol 2023; 92:1840-1855. [PMID: 37415521 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
Predation risk and prey responses exhibit fluctuations in space and time. Seasonal ecological disturbances can alter landscape structure and permeability to influence predator activity and efficacy, creating predictable patterns of risk for prey (seasonal risk landscapes). This may create corresponding seasonal shifts in antipredator behaviour, mediated by species ecology and trade-offs between risk and resources. Yet, how human recreation interacts with seasonal risk landscapes and antipredator behaviour remains understudied. In South Florida, we investigated the impact of a seasonal ecological disturbance, specifically flooding, which is inversely related to human activity, on interactions between Florida panthers (Puma concolor coryi) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). We hypothesized that human activity and ecological disturbances would interact with panther-deer ecology, resulting in the emergence of two distinct seasonal landscapes of predation risk and the corresponding antipredator responses. We conducted camera trap surveys across southwestern Florida to collect detection data on humans, panthers and deer. We analysed the influence of human site use and flooding on deer and panther detection probability, co-occurrence and diel activity during the flooded and dry seasons. Flooding led to decreased panther detections and increased deer detections, resulting in reduced deer-panther co-occurrence during the flooded season. Panthers exhibited increased nocturnality and reduced diel activity overlap with deer in areas with higher human activity. Supporting our hypothesis, panthers' avoidance of human recreation and flooding created distinct risk schedules for deer, driving their antipredator behaviour. Deer utilized flooded areas to spatially offset predation risk during the flooded season while increasing diurnal activity in response to human recreation during the dry season. We highlight the importance of understanding how competing risks and ecological disturbances influence predator and prey behaviour, leading to the generation of seasonal risk landscapes and antipredator responses. We emphasize the role of cyclical ecological disturbances in shaping dynamic predator-prey interactions. Furthermore, we highlight how human recreation may function as a 'temporal human shield,' altering seasonal risk landscapes and antipredator responses to reduce encounter rates between predators and prey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H N Abernathy
- Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
- Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, Texas, USA
- Haub School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA
| | - D A Crawford
- Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, Texas, USA
- Jones Center at Ichauway, Newton, Georgia, USA
| | - R B Chandler
- Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, Athens, Georgia, USA
| | - E P Garrison
- Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
| | - L M Conner
- Jones Center at Ichauway, Newton, Georgia, USA
| | - K V Miller
- Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, Athens, Georgia, USA
| | - M J Cherry
- Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bled F, Cherry MJ, Garrison EP, Miller KV, Conner LM, Abernathy HN, Ellsworth WH, Margenau LLS, Crawford DA, Engebretsen KN, Kelly BD, Shindle DB, Chandler RB. Balancing carnivore conservation and sustainable hunting of a key prey species: A case study on the Florida panther and white‐tailed deer. J Appl Ecol 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Florent Bled
- Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources The University of Georgia Athens GA USA
- Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission St. Petersburg FL USA
| | - Michael J. Cherry
- Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute Texas A&M University‐Kingsville Kingsville TX USA
| | - Elina P. Garrison
- Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Gainesville FL USA
| | - Karl V. Miller
- Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources The University of Georgia Athens GA USA
| | | | - Heather N. Abernathy
- Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute Texas A&M University‐Kingsville Kingsville TX USA
- Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg VA USA
| | - W. Hunter Ellsworth
- Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg VA USA
| | - Lydia L. S. Margenau
- Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources The University of Georgia Athens GA USA
| | - Daniel A. Crawford
- Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources The University of Georgia Athens GA USA
| | - Kristin N. Engebretsen
- Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources The University of Georgia Athens GA USA
| | - Brian D. Kelly
- Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources The University of Georgia Athens GA USA
| | - David B. Shindle
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Florida Ecological Services Field Office Immokalee FL USA
| | - Richard B. Chandler
- Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources The University of Georgia Athens GA USA
| |
Collapse
|