Beta-Blockers increase the risk of being born small for gestational age or of being institutionalised during infancy

Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy are a leading cause of global maternal and fetal morbidity. The four hypertensive disorders of pregnancy include chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia-eclampsia, and chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia. A careful history, review of systems, physical examination, and laboratory analysis can help differentiate these disorders and quantify the severity of the disease, which holds important implications for disease management. This article reviews the different types of disorders of hypertension in pregnancy and how to diagnose and manage these patients, with special attention paid to any recent changes made to this management algorithm.

Beta-Blockers in Pregnancy: Clinical Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review was to determine the anticipated benefits and adverse effects of beta-blockers in pregnant women with hypertension. The other issue was to assess the possible adverse effects of beta-blockers for their babies and provide current consensus recommendations for appropriate selection and individualized antihypertensive treatment with beta-blockers in pregnancy-associated hypertension.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a major cause of maternal and fetal morbidity, with consequences later in life. Certain beta-blockers are useful for ameliorating hypertension in pregnancy and may have a protective role in endothelial dysfunction. However, some aspects of beta-blocker use in pregnancy are contentious among providers. Evidence on their safety, although well documented, is variable, and recent research reveals areas of controversy. Besides intrauterine growth restriction, other neonatal and obstetric complications remain a concern and should be explored thoroughly. Attention is necessary when treating pregnancy-associated hypertensive disorders with beta-blockers. Specific beta-blockers are considered safe in pregnancy, although the associated effects in the fetus are not clearly known and evidence is lacking for many safety outcomes, other than intrauterine growth restriction. Nevertheless, beta-blockers with specific indications in pregnancy under individualized selection and monitoring may confer substantial improvements in pregnant women with hypertension.

Pharmacokinetics of the most commonly used antihypertensive drugs throughout pregnancy methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine: a systematic review

Purpose

Antihypertensive drugs are among the most prescribed drugs during pregnancy. Methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine have been perceived safe to use during pregnancy and are therefore recommended in international guidelines for treatment of hypertension. In this review, we provide a complete overview of what is known on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the antihypertensive drugs methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine throughout pregnancy.

Methods

A systematic search was performed to retrieve studies on the PK of methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine used throughout pregnancy. The search was restricted to English and original studies. The systematic search was conducted on July 27, 2021, in Embase, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Keywords were methyldopa, labetalol, nifedipine, pharmacokinetics, pregnancy, and placenta.

Results

A total of 1459 unique references were identified of which title and abstract were screened. Based on this screening, 67 full-text papers were assessed, to retain 30 PK studies of which 2 described methyldopa, 12 labetalol, and 16 nifedipine. No fetal accumulation is found for any of the antihypertensive drugs studied.

Conclusion

We conclude that despite decades of prescribing methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine throughout pregnancy, descriptions of their PK during pregnancy are hampered by a large heterogeneity in the low number of available studies. Aiming for evidence-based and personalized dosing of antihypertensive medication in the future, further studies on the relationship of both PK and pharmacodynamics (including the optimal blood pressure targeting) during pregnancy and pregnancy-related pathology are urgently needed to prevent undertreatment, overtreatment, and side effects.

Using Twitter Data for Cohort Studies of Drug Safety in Pregnancy: Proof-of-concept With β-Blockers

Background

Despite the fact that medication is taken during more than 90% of pregnancies, the fetal risk for most medications is unknown, and the majority of medications have no data regarding safety in pregnancy.

Objective

Using β-blockers as a proof-of-concept, the primary objective of this study was to assess the utility of Twitter data for a cohort study design—in particular, whether we could identify (1) Twitter users who have posted tweets reporting that they took medication during pregnancy and (2) their associated pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

We searched for mentions of β-blockers in 2.75 billion tweets posted by 415,690 users who announced their pregnancy on Twitter. We manually reviewed the matching tweets to first determine if the user actually took the β-blocker mentioned in the tweet. Then, to help determine if the β-blocker was taken during pregnancy, we used the time stamp of the tweet reporting intake and drew upon an automated natural language processing (NLP) tool that estimates the date of the user’s prenatal time period. For users who posted tweets indicating that they took or may have taken the β-blocker during pregnancy, we drew upon additional NLP tools to help identify tweets that report their pregnancy outcomes. Adverse pregnancy outcomes included miscarriage, stillbirth, birth defects, preterm birth (<37 weeks gestation), low birth weight (<5 pounds and 8 ounces at delivery), and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Normal pregnancy outcomes included gestational age ≥37 weeks and birth weight ≥5 pounds and 8 ounces.

Results

We retrieved 5114 tweets, posted by 2339 users, that mention a β-blocker, and manually identified 2332 (45.6%) tweets, posted by 1195 (51.1%) of the users, that self-report taking the β-blocker. We were able to estimate the date of the prenatal time period for 356 pregnancies among 334 (27.9%) of these 1195 users. Among these 356 pregnancies, we identified 257 (72.2%) during which the β-blocker was or may have been taken. We manually verified an adverse pregnancy outcome—preterm birth, NICU admission, low birth weight, birth defects, or miscarriage—for 38 (14.8%) of these 257 pregnancies. We manually verified a gestational age ≥37 weeks for 198 (90.4%) and a birth weight ≥5 pounds and 8 ounces for 50 (22.8%) of the 219 pregnancies for which we did not identify an adverse pregnancy outcome.

Conclusions

Our ability to detect pregnancy outcomes for Twitter users who posted tweets reporting that they took or may have taken a β-blocker during pregnancy suggests that Twitter can be a complementary resource for cohort studies of drug safety in pregnancy.

Lower blood pressure achieved leads to better pregnant outcomes in non-severe chronic hypertensive pregnant women

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relationship between blood pressure (BP) achieved during pregnancy and pregnant outcomes in non-severe chronic hypertensive women.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included pregnant women who diagnosed as non-severe chronic hypertension and delivered in Shanghai Renji Hospital from January 2010 to March 2017. Based on their mean antenatal office diastolic BP (dBP), patients were divided into higher BP achieved (HBPA, dBP ≥ 90 mmHg) group or lower BP achieved (LBPA, dBP < 90 mmHg) group. Primary outcome measurement was the composite of fetal or neonatal mortality and morbidities. Secondary outcomes were the adverse maternal outcomes.

RESULTS

Eligible 305 patients were included, among whom 98 were in HBPA group and 207 were in LBPA group. The HBPA group had significantly higher antenatal dBP [95.0 ± 4.8 vs 81.7 ± 5.6 mmHg, P < 0.001] than the LBPA group. After adjusting for six confounding factors (age, body-mass index (BMI), weeks of gestation at first antenatal visit, dBP measured at first antenatal visit, antihypertensive medication usage during pregnancy, complicating other medical condition), primary outcome [34.7% vs 15.9%, 2.30 (1.23-4.30)] was significantly higher in HBPA group. The incidences of SGA [21.4% vs 11.1%, 2.12 (1.03-4.38)], NICU admission [19.4% vs 6.3%, 3.54 (1.48-8.49)], preeclampsia with severe features [22.4% vs 10.6%, 2.23 (1.10-4.54)], severe hypertension [8.2% vs 0.5%, 15.68 (1.78-138.04)] were higher, and earlier gestational age at delivery [37.1 ± 2.6 vs 37.7 ± 2.1, P = 0.031], lower birthweight [2861.0 ± 780.0 vs 3059.0 ± 616.3, P = 0.029] in the HBPA group.

CONCLUSION

Lower BP achieved during gestation in pregnant women with non-severe chronic hypertension (CH) might improve both fetal/neonatal and maternal outcomes.

Motherhood: What every ophthalmologist needs to know

The aim of this review article is to summarize the available literature on physiologic and pathologic ocular changes during pregnancy and the effect of diseases in pregnancy. A literature search was conducted using PUBMED, MEDLINE, and Cochrane library in English. In addition, the cited references in the published articles were manually reviewed for the relevant results. Pregnancy encompasses a multitude of changes in all body systems, including the visual system of the female. The changes can be physiological, i.e., changes occurring in the lids and adnexa, cornea, conjunctiva, changes in tear film composition and intraocular pressure, retina, choroid, and visual field. Pathological changes in a pregnant woman's eye include changes related to preeclampsia and eclampsia, central serous chorioretinopathy, retinal artery or vein occlusions, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Preexisting diseases like diabetic retinopathy, Graves' disease, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, various inflammatory conditions can undergo changes in their course during pregnancy. Ophthalmic medications can have an effect on both mother and the baby and hence should be used cautiously. In addition, intrauterine infections play a major role in causing inflammation in the eye of the baby. Hence, vaccination of the mother prior to pregnancy plays an important role in preventing intrauterine infections in the neonate. A regular eye examination in the perinatal period plays a vital role in recognizing ophthalmic pathologies which might require a prompt medical intervention. Pathological ocular diseases should be discriminated from physiologic changes to establish an individualized treatment or preventive plan. This approach to ocular benefits of treatment to the mother should always weigh against the potential harm to the fetus.

Impact of Chronic Hypertension and Antihypertensive Treatment on Adverse Perinatal Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background Maternal chronic hypertension is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Previous studies examined the association between either chronic hypertension or antihypertensive treatment and adverse pregnancy outcomes. We aimed to synthesize the evidence on the effect of chronic hypertension/antihypertensive treatment on adverse pregnancy outcomes. Methods and Results Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched; we included observational studies and assessed the effect of race/ethnicity, where possible, following a registered protocol (CRD42019120088). Random-effects meta-analyses were used. A total of 81 studies were identified on chronic hypertension, and a total of 16 studies were identified on antihypertensive treatment. Chronic hypertension was associated with higher odds of preeclampsia (adjusted odd ratio [aOR], 5.43; 95% CI, 3.85-7.65); cesarean section (aOR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.6-2.16); maternal mortality (aOR, 4.80; 95% CI, 3.04-7.58); preterm birth (aOR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.96-2.53); stillbirth (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 2.22-2.42); and small for gestational age (SGA) (aOR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.6-2.40). Subgroup analyses indicated that maternal race/ethnicity does not influence the observed associations. Women with chronic hypertension on antihypertensive treatment (versus untreated) had higher odds of SGA (aOR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.38-2.50). Conclusions Chronic hypertension is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, and these associations appear to be independent of maternal race/ethnicity. In women with chronic hypertension, those on treatment had a higher risk of SGA, although the number of studies was limited. This could result from a direct effect of the treatment or because severe hypertension during pregnancy is a risk factor for SGA and women with severe hypertension are more likely to be treated. The effect of antihypertensive treatment on SGA needs to be further tested with large randomized controlled trials.

Neonatal effects of intrauterine metoprolol/bisoprolol exposure during the second and third trimester: a cohort study with two comparison groups

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to evaluate the effects of beta-blockers during the second and third trimester on fetal growth, length of gestation and postnatal symptoms in exposed infants.

METHODS

The current prospective observational cohort study compares 294 neonates of hypertensive mothers on metoprolol or bisoprolol during the second and/or third trimester with 225 methyldopa-exposed infants and 588 infants of nonhypertensive mothers. The risks for reduced birth weight, prematurity, neonatal bradycardia, hypoglycaemia and respiratory disorders were analysed.

RESULTS

The rate of small-for-gestational-age children was significantly higher in long-term beta-blocker exposed infants (24.1%) compared with the methyldopa cohort [10.2%, odds ratio (OR)adj 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-5.2] and the nonhypertensive cohort (9.9%, ORadj 4.3, 95% CI 2.6-7.1). The risk for preterm birth was significantly increased compared with nonhypertensive pregnancies (ORadj 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.8) but not compared with the methyldopa cohort. Neonatal adverse outcomes occurred more frequently in the study cohort (11.5%) compared with the nonhypertensive comparison group (6.5%) and the methyldopa cohort (8.4%), but without statistical significance (ORadj 1.5, 95% CI 0.7-3.0 and ORadj 1.5, 95% CI 0.7-3.3, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Long-term intrauterine exposure to metoprolol or bisoprolol may increase the risk of being born small-for-gestational-age. It is still a matter of debate to which extent maternal hypertension contributes to the lower birth weight. Serious neonatal symptoms are rare. Altogether, metoprolol and bisoprolol are well tolerated treatment options, but a case-by-case decision on close neonatal monitoring is recommended.

[Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy]

Hypertensive disorders occur in up to 10 % of pregnancies and increase both maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. The most important differential diagnoses comprise pre-existing chronic hypertension, pregnancy-associated hypertension, and preeclampsia with simultaneous proteinuria. Antihypertensive therapy during pregnancy should be initiated when blood pressure is 150-160/100-110 mmHg. With regard to an earlier initiation of therapy, the data situation is not clear. Pre-eclampsia is defined as new or pre-existing elevated blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg in pregnancy with at least one new organ manifestation, usually proteinuria ≥ 300 mg/day or ≥ 30 mg/mmol in the protein-creatinine ratio. Thrombotic microangiopathies TTP and aHUS are altogether rare but potentially life-threatening diseases that should be clarified in case of severe or atypical courses.

Management of glaucoma in pregnancy - balancing safety with efficacy

Glaucoma and pregnancy is an uncommon combination, but it constitutes a very challenging situation for the treating doctor. The challenge is not only controlling the intraocular pressure and preventing glaucoma progression in the mother, but also having to deal with her mental stress and anxiety regarding the safety of her child. The situation is further worsened by the lack of definite guidelines as to how to deal with such patients. Relative rarity of glaucoma in this population restricts any large prospective randomized clinical trials or any large systematic studies. Moreover, none of the existing anti-glaucoma medications is absolutely safe in pregnancy. Current practice patterns depend on some case reports, a few observational studies and a few animal studies that attempt at determining the safety and efficacy of the available medicines. These are then prescribed on the basis of their relative safety in any particular stage of pregnancy or lactation. Newer medications that were released recently in 2018, such as Vyzulta and Rhopressa, presently have limited data to support their safety for use during pregnancy. Laser trabeculoplasty, conventional filtration surgery (of course without anti-metabolites), and minimally invasive glaucoma surgery represent a few non-pharmacological management options. Surgical procedures such as trabeculectomy and tube-shunts or collagen matrix implants, and newer minimally invasive glaucoma surgery procedures such as the gelatin stents are currently being explored and may prove to be viable solutions for severe glaucoma during pregnancy, although they too have their own inherent drawbacks. Management of glaucoma during pregnancy and lactation requires careful consideration of the disease status, gestational stage, US Food and Drug Administration classification and guidelines, and potential benefits and limitations of the various therapeutic modalities. This review focuses on the importance of a multidisciplinary team approach, starting with preconception planning and counseling, determining the treatment options depending on the stage of glaucoma and of pregnancy, and emphasizes the involvement of the patients, their obstetrician, and pediatrician through active discussion regarding the various medical, laser, or surgical modalities currently available or under exploration for use during pregnancy and lactation. The ultimate aim is to achieve an optimal balance between the risks and benefits of any type of intervention, and to customize treatment on an individual basis in order to achieve the best outcomes for both mother and fetus.

Management of Glaucoma in Pregnancy

Management of glaucoma during pregnancy represents a challenge for the physician. Important disease and patients' health decisions begin even before conception and continue throughout pregnancy and breastfeeding. The data on this topic is limited due to ethical and legal constraints and challenges of conducting large, prospective, and randomized clinical trials on this patient population. Our review suggests that individually, intraocular pressure is lower in a pregnant woman when compared with a nonpregnant woman. Importantly, the medical management of glaucoma during pregnancy poses special challenges due to the possibility of adverse effects of medications on the fetus and newborn. Laser trabeculoplasty and traditional filtration surgery, and minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, represent nondrug management options. Thus, managing glaucoma in pregnancy is a delicate balance between treatment to prevent damage to the optic nerve in the mother and avoidance of interventions potentially harmful to the fetus. This literature review of published individual and population-based studies was performed to explore current knowledge and guidelines in the management of glaucoma in pregnancy.

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC) in pregnancy: a case series of nine patients and review of literature

Background: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a genetic cardiomyopathy characterized by myocardial necrosis and fibrofatty substitution of the myocardium, predominantly of the right ventricle. The evaluation of risk associated with gestation and delivery in patients with ARVC is difficult due to the small number of already reported cases. We present our experience of patients with ARVC who completed a pregnancy and delivery.Methods: A case series of nine women in Calgary, Canada, from 2013 to 2018, who were diagnosed with ARVC before or during pregnancy. Patients were identified using our Cardiac-Obstetrics database, and information was collected through electronic charts and patient recollection.Results: All pregnancies reported were singleton with an average maternal age of 31 years. Six patients had a related genetic mutation. Beta blockers were being used by eight, and five had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) prior to the pregnancy. None of the patients developed heart failure during pregnancy, but one had a complicated antepartum and postpartum course. All pregnancies delivered at term with eight receiving neuroaxial analgesia. Five patients delivered vaginally. Those without an ICD had continuous cardiac monitoring intrapartum. The incidence of small for gestational age (33%) was higher than the general population. All of the patients breastfed the newborns.Conclusions: Pregnancies in these patients with ARVC were generally well tolerated. Given the rarity of the disease and absence of any clinical guidelines, multidisciplinary care is essential in the management of these patients.

Use of Prescribed Psychotropics during Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Pregnancy, Neonatal, and Childhood Outcomes

This paper reviews the findings from preclinical animal and human clinical research investigating maternal/fetal, neonatal, and child neurodevelopmental outcomes following prenatal exposure to psychotropic drugs. Evidence for the risks associated with prenatal exposure was examined, including teratogenicity, neurodevelopmental effects, neonatal toxicity, and long-term neurobehavioral consequences (i.e., behavioral teratogenicity). We conducted a comprehensive review of the recent results and conclusions of original research and reviews, respectively, which have investigated the short- and long-term impact of drugs commonly prescribed to pregnant women for psychological disorders, including mood, anxiety, and sleep disorders. Because mental illness in the mother is not a benign event, and may itself pose significant risks to both mother and child, simply discontinuing or avoiding medication use during pregnancy may not be possible. Therefore, prenatal exposure to psychotropic drugs is a major public health concern. Decisions regarding drug choice, dose, and duration should be made carefully, by balancing severity, chronicity, and co-morbidity of the mental illness, disorder, or condition against the potential risk for adverse outcomes due to drug exposure. Globally, maternal mental health problems are considered as a major public health challenge, which requires a stronger focus on mental health services that will benefit both mother and child. More preclinical and clinical research is needed in order to make well-informed decisions, understanding the risks associated with the use of psychotropic medications during pregnancy.

Pregnancy outcome after first trimester exposure to bisoprolol: an observational cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Beta-blockers are frequently used during pregnancy, with labetalol and metoprolol being considered as drugs of choice. As there are no prospective pregnancy studies for bisoprolol yet, our aim was to analyze pregnancy outcomes after bisoprolol exposure.

METHODS

Pregnancies exposed to bisoprolol during the first trimester were retrieved from the German Embryotox pharmacovigilance database. Pregnancy outcomes of prospectively ascertained pregnancies were compared with women neither exposed to beta-blockers nor other antihypertensives. In addition, retrospective reports on adverse drug reactions were screened for patterns of birth defects.

RESULTS

Inclusion criteria for the prospective study were met by 339 bisoprolol-treated women and 678 patients in the comparison cohort. Neither the risk for spontaneous abortions [adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj.) 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-1.70] nor for major congenital malformations [adjusted odds ratio (ORadj.) 0.77; 95% CI 0.34-1.75] was increased after first trimester bisoprolol treatment. However, higher rates of preterm births [ORadj. 1.90; 95% CI 1.17-3.11] and reduced birthweights in singleton pregnancies (adjusted standard deviation score difference -0.48; 95% CI -0.62 to -0.34) were noted. Continued treatment with beta-blockers until birth was found to be associated with a higher risk for growth restriction than first trimester exposure only. A sensitivity analysis did not suggest higher rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes in hypertensive women on bisoprolol compared with nonhypertensive bisoprolol-exposed women.

CONCLUSION

Our study supports the hypothesis that first trimester bisoprolol treatment does not increase the risk for spontaneous abortions or major birth defects. However, an influence of prolonged bisoprolol exposure on fetal growth cannot be ruled out.

Hypertension in pregnancy: Pathophysiology and treatment

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, an umbrella term that includes preexisting and gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and eclampsia, complicate up to 10% of pregnancies and represent a significant cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Despite the differences in guidelines, there appears to be consensus that severe hypertension and non-severe hypertension with evidence of end-organ damage need to be controlled; yet the ideal target ranges below 160/110 mmHg remain a source of debate. This review outlines the definition, pathophysiology, goals of therapy, and treatment agents used in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Current and emerging pharmacotherapy for emergency management of preeclampsia

INTRODUCTION

Preeclampsia is a disease specific to pregnancy characterised by new onset hypertension with maternal organ dysfunction and/or fetal growth restriction. It remains a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. For fifty years, antihypertensives have been the mainstay of treating preeclampsia, reducing maternal morbidity and mortality. With increased knowledge of the mechanisms underlying the disease has come opportunities for novel therapies that complement antihypertensives by protecting the maternal vasculature. Areas covered: In this review, the authors consider, in detail, the antihypertensives commonly used today in the emergency care of women with severe preeclampsia. They also review less common anti-hypertensive agents and discuss the role of magnesium sulphate in the management of preeclampsia and the prevention of eclampsia. Finally, they explore novel therapeutics for the acute management of preeclampsia. Expert opinion: The rapid control of maternal hypertension will, and must, remain the mainstay of emergency treatment for women with severe preeclampsia. The role of magnesium sulphate as a primary prevention for eclampsia is context dependant and should not displace a focus on correcting blood pressure safely. The exploration of novel adjuvant therapies will likely allow us to prolong pregnancy longer and improve perinatal outcomes safely for the mother.

Maternal Hypertension, Antihypertensive Medication Use, and Small for Gestational Age Births in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011

Background Small for gestational age (SGA) birth is associated with poor long-term health outcomes. It is unclear whether maternal antihypertensive medication increases risk of SGA independently of maternal hypertension. Methods We analyzed associations between maternal hypertension and antihypertensive medication use and SGA among non-malformed singleton controls in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. We defined SGA as birthweight < 10th percentile for a given gestational age, sex, race/ethnicity, and parity. We included 1045 SGA and 10,019 non-SGA births. We used logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed interaction between hypertension, antihypertensive use, and maternal race/ethnicity and age. Results Overall, 122 (11.7%) SGA and 892 (8.9%) non-SGA mothers reported hypertension and 21 (2.0%) SGA and 154 (1.5%) non-SGA mothers reported antihypertensive use. The most commonly reported medications were centrally-acting antiadrenergics, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics. Compared to normotensive pregnancies, maternal hypertension, regardless of treatment (AOR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.20, 1.86]), and untreated maternal hypertension [AOR, 1.46 (95% CI, 1.15, 1.86)] were associated with SGA. We observed a positive, but not significant, association between antihypertensive use and SGA. SGA risk varied by maternal race/ethnicity, being highest among Hispanic mothers, and age, being highest among mothers ≥ 35 years, but statistical tests for interaction were not significant. Conclusions Consistent with the literature, our findings suggest that maternal hypertension slightly increases SGA risk. We did not observe an appreciably increased SGA risk associated with antihypertensive medication use beyond that of the underlying maternal hypertension.

Review of Cardiovascular Drugs in Pregnancy

Cardiovascular disease is now the leading cause of pregnancy-related deaths in the United States. Increasing maternal mortality in the United States underscores the importance of proper cardiovascular management. Significant physiological changes during pregnancy affect the heart's ability to respond to pathological processes such as hypertension and heart failure. These physiological changes further affect the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of cardiac medications. During pregnancy, these changes can significantly alter medication efficacy and metabolism. This article systematically reviews the literature on safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of cardiovascular drugs used for hypertension and heart failure during pregnancy and lactation. The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guidelines recommend transitioning pregnant patients to methyldopa, nifedipine, or labetalol. Heart failure medications, including beta-blockers, furosemide, and digoxin, are relatively safe and can be used effectively. Medications that block the renin angiotensin-aldosterone system have been shown to be beneficial in the general population; however, they are teratogenic and, therefore, contraindicated in pregnancy. Cardiovascular medications can also enter breast milk and, therefore, care must be taken when selecting drugs during the lactation period. A summary of the safety of drugs during pregnancy and lactation from an online resource, LactMed by the National Library of Medicine's TOXNET database, is included. High-risk pregnant patients with cardiovascular disease require a multispecialty team of doctors, including health care providers from obstetrics and gynecology, maternal fetal medicine, internal medicine, cardiovascular disease specialists, and specialized pharmacology expertise.

Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with the use of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers for chronic hypertension in early pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

Previous research reported greater risk of adverse perinatal outcomes associated with first trimester exposure to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in comparison to unexposed pregnancies among non-hypertensive women. We examined the relationship between first trimester exposure to ACEIs and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and maternal and perinatal outcomes, whilst controlling for the underlying hypertension.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a population-based cohort study among 130,061 pregnancies resulting in birth in NSW, Australia between 2005 and 2012. Birth data were linked to hospital discharge and pharmaceutical dispensing records. After restricting to women with chronic hypertension, 67 and 73 pregnancies exposed to ACEIs and ARBs respectively during the first trimester were compared with 316 pregnancies exposed to methyldopa.

STUDY OUTCOMES

Preterm delivery, caesarean section, low birth weight, small for gestational age and Apgar score <7.

RESULTS

Compared to pregnancies exposed to methyldopa, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for ACEI exposure was 0.5 (95% CI: 0.2-1.1) for preterm delivery, 1.6 (0.8-3.1) for caesarean section, 0.6 (0.2-1.3) for LBW and 0.8 (0.4-1.9) for SGA. The corresponding aORs and confidence intervals for ARB exposure were 0.7 (0.3-1.5), 1.2 (0.6-2.6), 1.3 (0.7-2.6), and 1.2 (0.6-2.4).

CONCLUSION

No association between early pregnancy exposure to ACEIs and ARBs and perinatal outcomes was observed, however, the possibility of an association cannot be ruled out due to limited power. Nonetheless, this study suggests that the magnitude of risk is smaller than that reported previously.

Influence of Gestational Age at Initiation of Antihypertensive Therapy: Secondary Analysis of CHIPS Trial Data (Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study)

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

For hypertensive women in CHIPS (Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study), we assessed whether the maternal benefits of tight control could be achieved, while minimizing any potentially negative effect on fetal growth, by delaying initiation of antihypertensive therapy until later in pregnancy. For the 981 women with nonsevere, chronic or gestational hypertension randomized to less-tight (target diastolic blood pressure, 100 mm Hg), or tight (target, 85 mm Hg) control, we used mixed-effects logistic regression to examine whether the effect of less-tight (versus tight) control on major outcomes was dependent on gestational age at randomization, adjusting for baseline factors as in the primary analysis and including an interaction term between gestational age at randomization and treatment allocation. Gestational age was considered categorically (quartiles) and continuously (linear or quadratic form), and the optimal functional form selected to provide the best fit to the data based on the Akaike information criterion. Randomization before (but not after) 24 weeks to less-tight (versus tight) control was associated with fewer babies with birth weight <10th centile (P_interaction=0.005), but more preterm birth (P_interaction=0.043), and no effect on perinatal death or high-level neonatal care >48 hours (P_interaction=0.354). For the mother, less-tight (versus tight) control was associated with more severe hypertension at all gestational ages but particularly so before 28 weeks (P_interaction=0.076). In women with nonsevere, chronic, or gestational hypertension, there seems to be no gestational age at which less-tight (versus tight) control is the preferred management strategy to optimize maternal or perinatal outcomes.

The effect of labetalol and nifedipine MR on blood pressure in women with chronic hypertension in pregnancy

AIM

To compare the blood pressure (BP) lowering effects of labetalol and nifedipine modified release (MR) in hypertensive pregnant women. We also investigated the effect on the heart rate (HR) and determined the proportion of time spent in target.

METHODS

This was an exploratory study. Women with chronic hypertension taking either labetalol or nifedipine were offered 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Sleep, wake and drug ingestion times were self-reported. An indirect response model was used to analyse the systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP) and HR time-series; the effect of gestation and type of drug was evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-eight women were recruited: 24 in each group. There was no difference in clinical characteristics. In women taking nifedipine there was a positive association between the dose of nifedipine and pre-dose BP p = .002, this was not present in the labetalol group. There was a difference between the drug effects on both the SBP and DBP time-series (p = .014). In comparison to labetalol, there was less variation in day time BP in those women prescribed nifedipine. Women on labetalol spent a larger proportion of time with their DBP below target (<80 mmHg). The HR dynamics were qualitatively different, a stimulatory effect was found with nifedipine compared to an inhibitory effect with labetalol.

CONCLUSION

There are significant and important differences between the BP lowering effects of nifedipine and labetalol. A large randomised control trial is required to investigate the relationship between BP variability and time in target on pregnancy outcomes.

The Role of KCNQ1 Mutations and Maternal Beta Blocker Use During Pregnancy in the Growth of Children With Long QT Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Two missense mutations in KCNQ1, an imprinted gene that encodes the alpha subunit of the voltage-gated potassium channel Kv7.1, cause autosomal dominant growth hormone deficiency and maternally inherited gingival fibromatosis. We evaluated endocrine features, birth size, and subsequent somatic growth of patients with long QT syndrome 1 (LQT1) due to loss-of-function mutations in KCNQ1.

DESIGN

Medical records of 104 patients with LQT1 in a single tertiary care center between 1995 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed.

METHODS

Clinical and endocrine data of the LQT1 patients were included in the analyses.

RESULTS

At birth, patients with a maternally inherited mutation (n = 52) were shorter than those with paternal inheritance of the mutation (n = 29) (birth length, -0.70 ± 1.1 SDS vs. -0.2 ± 1.0 SDS, P < 0.05). Further analyses showed, however, that only newborns (n = 19) of mothers who had received beta blockers during pregnancy were shorter and lighter at birth than those with paternal inheritance of the mutation (n = 29) (-0.89 ± 1.0 SDS vs. -0.20 ± 1.0 SDS, P < 0.05; and 3,173 ± 469 vs. 3,515 ± 466 g, P < 0.05). Maternal beta blocker treatment during the pregnancy was also associated with lower cord blood TSH levels (P = 0.011) and significant catch-up growth during the first year of life (Δ0.08 SDS/month, P = 0.004). Later, childhood growth of the patients was unremarkable.

CONCLUSION

Loss-of-function mutations in KCNQ1 are not associated with abnormalities in growth, whereas maternal beta blocker use during pregnancy seems to modify prenatal growth of LQT1 patients-a phenomenon followed by catch-up growth after birth.

Determination of antepartum and intrapartum risk factors associated with neonatal intensive care unit admission

OBJECTIVE

To determine antepartum and intrapartum factors that are associated with admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) among infants delivered between 36.0 and 42.0 weeks at our institution.

METHODS

The retrospective cohort study included 73 consecutive NICU admissions and 375 consecutive non-NICU admissions. Data on demographic, antepartum, intrapartum and neonatal factors were collected. The primary endpoint defined was admission to NICU. Univariate analyses using the Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, χ2 Fisher's exact test was performed along with multivariate analysis of significant non-redundant variables.

RESULTS

Those with a significantly higher risk of NICU admission underwent induction of labor with prostaglandin analogs (12.5% vs. 24.7%, P=0.007). Length of first stage ≥720 min (33.5% vs. 51.9%, P=0.011), length of second stage of labor ≥240 min (10.6% vs. 31.6%, P<0.001) and prolonged rupture of membranes ≥120 min (54.0% vs. 80.0%, P=0.001) were all associated with an increased chance of NICU admission. Intrapartum factors predictive of NICU admission included administration of meperidine (11.7% vs. 27.4%, P<0.001), presence of preeclampsia (5.5% vs. 0.8%, P=0.015), use of intrapartum IV antihypertensives (1.1% vs. 13.7%, P<0.001), maternal fever (5.3% vs. 31.5%, P<0.001), fetal tachycardia (1.9% vs. 12.3%, P<0.001), and presence of meconium (30% vs. 8%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Identification of modifiable risk factors may reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality. Results from this study can be used to develop and validate a risk model based on combined antepartum and intrapartum risk factors.

Pregnancy and Thoracic Aortic Disease: Managing the Risks

The most common aortopathies in women of childbearing age are bicuspid aortic valve, coarctation of the aorta, Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Loeys-Dietz syndrome, SMAD3 aortopathy, Turner syndrome, and familial thoracic aneurysm and dissection. The hemodynamic and hormonal changes of pregnancy increase the risk of progressive dilatation or dissection of the aorta in these women. The presence of hypertension increases the risk further. Therefore, appropriate preconception counselling is advised. For women who become pregnant, serial follow-up by a specialized multidisciplinary team throughout pregnancy and postpartum period is required. In this review we discuss risk assessment and management strategies for women with aortopathies.

Do labetalol and methyldopa have different effects on pregnancy outcome? Analysis of data from the Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study (CHIPS) trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare pregnancy outcomes, accounting for allocated group, between methyldopa-treated and labetalol-treated women in the CHIPS Trial (ISRCTN 71416914) of 'less tight' versus 'tight' control of pregnancy hypertension.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of CHIPS Trial cohort.

SETTING

International randomised controlled trial (94 sites, 15 countries).

POPULATION OR SAMPLE

Of 987 CHIPS recruits, 481/566 (85.0%) women treated with antihypertensive therapy at randomisation. Of 981 (99.4%) women followed to delivery, 656/745 (88.1%) treated postrandomisation.

METHODS

Logistic regression to compare outcomes among women who took methyldopa or labetalol, adjusted for the influence of baseline factors.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

CHIPS primary (perinatal loss or high level neonatal care for >48 hours) and secondary (serious maternal complications) outcomes, birthweight <10th centile, severe maternal hypertension, pre-eclampsia and delivery at <34 or <37 weeks.

RESULTS

Methyldopa and labetalol were used commonly at randomisation (243/987, 24.6% and 238/987, 24.6%, respectively) and post-randomisation (224/981, 22.8% and 433/981, 44.1%, respectively). Following adjusted analyses, methyldopa (versus labetalol) at randomisation was associated with fewer babies with birthweight <10th centile [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.48; 95% CI 0.20-0.87]. Methyldopa (versus labetalol) postrandomisation was associated with fewer CHIPS primary outcomes (aOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.40-1.00), birthweight <10th centile (aOR 0.54; 95% CI 0.32-0.92), severe hypertension (aOR 0.51; 95% CI 0.31-0.83), pre-eclampsia (aOR 0.55; 95% CI 0.36-0.85), and delivery at <34 weeks (aOR 0.53; 95% CI 0.29-0.96) or <37 weeks (aOR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35-0.85).

CONCLUSION

These nonrandomised comparisons are subject to residual confounding, but women treated with methyldopa (versus labetalol), particularly those with pre-existing hypertension, may have had better outcomes.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

There was no evidence that women treated with methyldopa versus labetalol had worse outcomes.