1
|
Whittington JR, Ghahremani T, Whitham M, Phillips AM, Spracher BN, Magann EF. Alternate Birth Strategies. Int J Womens Health 2023; 15:1151-1159. [PMID: 37496517 PMCID: PMC10368118 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s405533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Community birth is defined as birth that occurs outside the hospital setting. Birthing in a birth center can be safe for certain patient populations. Home birth can also be safe in well-selected patient with a well-established transfer infrastructure should an emergency occur. Unfortunately, many areas of the United States and the world do not have this infrastructure, limiting access to safe community birth. Immersion during labor has been associated with decreased need for epidural and pain medication. Delivery should not occur in water due to concerns for infection and cord avulsion. Umbilical cord non-severance (also called lotus birth) and placentophagy should be counseled against due to well-documented risks without clear benefit. Birth plans and options should be regularly discussed during pregnancy visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie R Whittington
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Navy Medicine Readiness and Training Command Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA, USA
| | - Taylor Ghahremani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Megan Whitham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA
| | - Amy M Phillips
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Bethany N Spracher
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Edward via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Everett F Magann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nethery E, Schummers L, Levine A, Caughey AB, Souter V, Gordon W. Birth Outcomes for Planned Home and Licensed Freestanding Birth Center Births in Washington State. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 138:693-702. [PMID: 34619716 PMCID: PMC8522628 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe rates of maternal and perinatal birth outcomes for community births and to compare outcomes by planned place of birth (home vs state-licensed, freestanding birth center) in a Washington State birth cohort, where midwifery practice and integration mirrors international settings. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all births attended by members of a statewide midwifery professional association that were within professional association guidelines and met eligibility criteria for planned birth center birth (term gestation, singleton, vertex fetus with no known fluid abnormalities at term, no prior cesarean birth, no hypertensive disorders, no prepregnancy diabetes), from January 1, 2015 through June 30, 2020. Outcome rates were calculated for all planned community births in the cohort. Estimated relative risks were calculated comparing delivery and perinatal outcomes for planned births at home to state-licensed birth centers, adjusted for parity and other confounders. RESULTS The study population included 10,609 births: 40.9% planned home and 59.1% planned birth center births. Intrapartum transfers to hospital were more frequent among nulliparous individuals (30.5%; 95% CI 29.2-31.9) than multiparous individuals (4.2%; 95% CI 3.6-4.6). The cesarean delivery rate was 11.4% (95% CI 10.2-12.3) in nulliparous individuals and 0.87% (95% CI 0.7-1.1) in multiparous individuals. The perinatal mortality rate after the onset of labor (intrapartum and neonatal deaths through 7 days) was 0.57 (95% CI 0.19-1.04) per 1,000 births. Rates for other adverse outcomes were also low. Compared with planned birth center births, planned home births had similar risks in crude and adjusted analyses. CONCLUSION Rates of adverse outcomes for this cohort in a U.S. state with well-established and integrated community midwifery were low overall. Birth outcomes were similar for births planned at home or at a state-licensed, freestanding birth center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Nethery
- School of Population and Public Health and the Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Smooth Transitions, Foundation for Health Care Quality, Seattle, Washington; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and the Obstetrical Care Outcomes Assessment Program, the Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, and the Department of Midwifery, Bastyr University, Seattle, Washington
| | - Laura Schummers
- School of Population and Public Health and the Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Smooth Transitions, Foundation for Health Care Quality, Seattle, Washington; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and the Obstetrical Care Outcomes Assessment Program, the Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, and the Department of Midwifery, Bastyr University, Seattle, Washington
| | - Audrey Levine
- School of Population and Public Health and the Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Smooth Transitions, Foundation for Health Care Quality, Seattle, Washington; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and the Obstetrical Care Outcomes Assessment Program, the Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, and the Department of Midwifery, Bastyr University, Seattle, Washington
| | - Aaron B. Caughey
- School of Population and Public Health and the Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Smooth Transitions, Foundation for Health Care Quality, Seattle, Washington; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and the Obstetrical Care Outcomes Assessment Program, the Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, and the Department of Midwifery, Bastyr University, Seattle, Washington
| | - Vivienne Souter
- School of Population and Public Health and the Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Smooth Transitions, Foundation for Health Care Quality, Seattle, Washington; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and the Obstetrical Care Outcomes Assessment Program, the Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, and the Department of Midwifery, Bastyr University, Seattle, Washington
| | - Wendy Gordon
- School of Population and Public Health and the Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Smooth Transitions, Foundation for Health Care Quality, Seattle, Washington; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and the Obstetrical Care Outcomes Assessment Program, the Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, and the Department of Midwifery, Bastyr University, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ovaskainen K, Ojala R, Gissler M, Luukkaala T, Tammela O. Is birth out-of-hospital associated with mortality and morbidity by seven years of age? PLoS One 2021; 16:e0250163. [PMID: 33882082 PMCID: PMC8059817 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and aims Compared to in-hospital births, the long-term outcome of children born out-of-hospital, planned or unplanned, is poorly studied. This study aimed to examine mortality and morbidity by seven years of age in children born out-of-hospital compared to those born in-hospital. Methods This study was registered retrospectively and included 790 136 children born in Finland between 1996 and 2013. The study population was divided into three groups according to birth site: in-hospital (n = 788 622), planned out-of-hospital (n = 176), and unplanned out-of-hospital (n = 1338). Data regarding deaths, hospital visits, reimbursement of medical expenses, and disability allowances was collected up to seven years of age or by the year-end of 2018. The association between birth site and childhood morbidity was determined using multivariable-adjusted Cox hazard regression analysis. Results No deaths were reported during the first seven years after birth in the children born out-of-hospital. The percentage of children with hospital visits due to infection by seven years of age was lower in those born planned out-of-hospital and in the combined planned out-of-hospital and unplanned out-of-hospital group compared to those born in-hospital. Furthermore, the percentage of children with hospital visits and who received disability allowances due to neurological or mental disorders was higher among those born unplanned out-of-hospital and out-of-hospital in total when compared to those born in-hospital. In the multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, the hazard ratio for hospital visits due to asthma and/or allergic diseases (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.72–0.98) was lower in children born out-of-hospital when compared to those born in-hospital. A similar decreased risk was found due to infections (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.68–0.84). However, the risk for neurological or mental health disorders was similar between the children born in-hospital and out-of-hospital. Conclusions Morbidity related to asthma or allergic diseases and infections by seven years of age appeared to be lower in children born out-of-hospital. Birth out-of-hospital seemed to not be associated with increased risk for neurological morbidity nor early childhood mortality. Our study groups were small and heterogeneous and because of this the results need to be interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Ovaskainen
- Department of Pediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
- School of Medicine Doctoral Programme, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
- * E-mail:
| | - Riitta Ojala
- Department of Pediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
- Center for Child Health Research, Tampere University and University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Mika Gissler
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
- Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tiina Luukkaala
- Tampere University Hospital, Research, Development and Innovation Center, Tampere, Finland
- Tampere University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Health Sciences, Tampere, Finland
| | - Outi Tammela
- Department of Pediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Galera-Barbero TM, Aguilera-Manrique G. Planned Home Birth in Low-Risk Pregnancies in Spain: A Descriptive Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18073784. [PMID: 33916388 PMCID: PMC8038591 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that planned home birth in low-risk pregnancies is a generally safe option. However nowadays, only 0.5 percent of deliveries have been at home in Spain. This study sought to understand the characteristics of planned home births with qualified healthcare professionals in low-risk pregnancies and their results on maternal and neonatal health in the Balearic Islands. The study followed a retrospective descriptive design to investigate planned home births from 1989 to 2019 (n = 820). Sociodemographic data of women, healthcare professional intervention rates, and maternal/fetal morbidity/mortality results were collected. Statistical analysis of the results was performed using the IBM SPSS Version 25 software package. The results indicated that women with low-risk pregnancies who planned home births with a qualified midwife had a higher probability of spontaneous vaginal birth delivery and positive maternal health results. Furthermore, the risk of hospital transfer was low (10.7%) and the rate of prolonged breastfeeding (>1 year) was extremely high (99%). Moreover, the study showed that planned home births can be generally associated with fetal well-being. The conclusions and implications of this study are that planned home births in low-risk pregnancies attended by qualified midwives in the Balearic Islands achieve positive results in both maternal and newborn health, as well as low rates of obstetric intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trinidad M. Galera-Barbero
- Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain
- Correspondence:
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alcaraz-Vidal L, Escuriet R, Sàrries Zgonc I, Robleda G. Planned homebirth in Catalonia (Spain): A descriptive study. Midwifery 2021; 98:102977. [PMID: 33751929 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.102977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- L Alcaraz-Vidal
- PhD candidate, Biomedicine Programme, Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, University Pompeu Fabra. Barcelona, Spain; Midwife Coordinator Birth Centre Project, Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital, Carretera del Canyet S/N 08, Badalona, Spain; Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Group, (GRASSIR), Catalan Health Institute Barcelona, Spain; Catalan Association of Homebirth Midwives, Spain.
| | - R Escuriet
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Ramon Llull. Global Health Gender and Society (GHenderS) Research Group. Barcelona, Spain; Catalan Health Service. Government of Catalonia, Spain
| | - I Sàrries Zgonc
- Catalan Association of Homebirth Midwives, Spain; Independent RM, Spain
| | - G Robleda
- Campus Docent Fundació Privada Sant Joan de Déu, School of Nursing, University of Barcelona. Spain; Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre. Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Reszel J, Weiss D, Darling EK, Sidney D, Van Wagner V, Soderstrom B, Rogers J, Holmberg V, Peterson WE, Khan BM, Walker MC, Sprague AE. Client Experience with the Ontario Birth Center Demonstration Project. J Midwifery Womens Health 2020; 66:174-184. [PMID: 33336882 PMCID: PMC8247041 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 07/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In 2014, 2 new freestanding midwifery-led birth centers opened in Ontario, Canada. As one part of a larger mixed-methods evaluation of the first year of operations of the centers, our primary objective was to compare the experiences of women receiving midwifery care who intended to give birth at the new birth centers with those intending to give birth at home or in hospital. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey of women cared for by midwives with admitting privileges at one of the 2 birth centers. Consenting women received the survey 3 to 6 weeks after their due date. We stratified the analysis by intended place of birth at the beginning of labor, regardless of where the actual birth occurred. One composite indicator was created (Composite Satisfaction Score, out of 20), and statistical significance (P < .05) was assessed using one-way analysis of variance. Responses to the open-ended questions were reviewed and grouped into broader categories. RESULTS In total, 382 women completed the survey (response rate 54.6%). Half intended to give birth at a birth center (n = 191). There was a significant difference on the Composite Satisfaction Scores between the birth center (19.4), home (19.5), and hospital (18.9) groups (P < .001). Among women who intended to give birth in a birth center, scores were higher in the women admitted to the birth center compared with those who were not (P = .037). Overall, women giving birth at a birth center were satisfied with the learners present at their birth, the accessibility of the centers, and the physical amenities, and they had suggestions for minor improvements. DISCUSSION We found positive experiences and high satisfaction among women receiving midwifery care, regardless of intended place of birth. Women admitted to the birth centers had positive experiences with these new centers; however, future research should be planned to reassess and further understand women's experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Reszel
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,CHEO Research Institute, CHEO, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deborah Weiss
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elizabeth K Darling
- McMaster Midwifery Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dana Sidney
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vicki Van Wagner
- Midwifery Education Program, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bobbi Soderstrom
- Midwifery Education Program, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Association of Ontario Midwives (AOM), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Judy Rogers
- Midwifery Education Program, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vivian Holmberg
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wendy E Peterson
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bushra M Khan
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark C Walker
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Newborn Care, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ann E Sprague
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,CHEO Research Institute, CHEO, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Newburn M, Scanlon M, Plachcinski R, Jill Macfarlane A. Involving service users in the Birth Timing project, a data linkage study analysing the timing of births and their outcomes. Int J Popul Data Sci 2020; 5:1366. [PMID: 34007886 PMCID: PMC8121135 DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i3.1366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We report on service user participation in a population-based data linkage study designed to analyse the daily, weekly and yearly cycles of births in England and Wales, the outcomes for women and babies, and their implications for the NHS. Public Involvement and Engagement (PI&E) has a long history in maternity services, though PI&E in maternity data linkage studies is new in the United Kingdom. We have used the GRIPP2 short form, a tool designed for reporting public involvement in research. OBJECTIVES We aimed to involve and engage a wide range of maternity service users and their representatives to ensure that our use of patient-identifiable routinely collected maternity and birth records was acceptable and that our research analyses using linked data were relevant to their expressed safety and quality of care needs. METHODS A three-tiered approach to PI&E was used. Having both PI&E co-investigators and PI&E members of the Study Advisory Group ensured service user involvement was part of the strategic development of the project. A larger constituency of maternity service users from England and Wales was engaged through four regional workshops. RESULTS Two co-investigators with experience of PI&E in maternity research were involved as service user researchers from design stage to dissemination. Four PI&E study advisors contributed service user perspectives. Engagement workshops attracted around 100 attendees, recruited largely from Maternity Services Liaison Committees in England and Wales, and a community engagement group. They supported the use of patient-identifiable data, believing the study had potential to improve safety and quality of maternity services. They contributed their experiences and concerns which will assist with interpretation of the analyses. CONCLUSION Use of PI&E 'knowledge intermediaries' successfully bridged the gap between data intensive research and lived experience, but more inclusivity in involvement and engagement is required. Respecting the concerns and questions of service users provides social legitimacy and a relevance framework for researchers carrying out analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Newburn
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK
| | - Miranda Scanlon
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK
| | - Rachel Plachcinski
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK
| | - Alison Jill Macfarlane
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Temesgen MM, Gebregzi AH, Kasahun HG, Ahmed SA, Woldegerima YB. Evaluation of decision to delivery time interval and its effect on feto-maternal outcomes and associated factors in category-1 emergency caesarean section deliveries: prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20:164. [PMID: 32183720 PMCID: PMC7077147 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-2828-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Category-1 emergency caesarean section delivery is the commonly performed surgical procedure in pregnant women associated with significant mortality and morbidity both in the mother and fetus. The decision to delivery time interval is recommended to be less than 30 min by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists as well as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. This study was designed to evaluate the decision to delivery time interval and its effect on feto-maternal outcomes and the associated factors during category-1 emergency caesarean section deliveries. Method A prospective observational cohort study was conducted from March to May 2018 at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital obstetrics Operation Theater and postnatal ward. A total of 163 clients who were undergone category-1 emergency caesarean section were included in this study. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20 (IBM Corporate). Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression with a 95% confidence interval was used to determine the association of decision to delivery time interval with predictor variables and feto-maternal outcomes. Results Only 19.6% of women had a decision to delivery time interval below 30 min. The average decision to delivery time interval was 42 ± 21.4 min, the average time from the decision of category-1 emergency caesarean section arrival to the operation theater was 21.58 ± 19.76 min and from theater to delivery of anesthesia was 11.5 ± 3.6 min. Factors that were associated with prolonged decision to delivery time interval were: time taken to collect surgical materials (AOR = 13.76, CI = 1.12–168.7), time taken from decision and arrival to the operation theater (AOR = 0.75, CI = 0.17–3.25) and time taken from arrival at the operation theater to the immediate start of skin incision (AOR = 0.43, CI = 0.28–0.65). Conclusion Delivery was not achieved within the recommended time interval in the majority of category-1 emergency caesarean sections. The average decision to delivery time interval was longer than the recommended time but it did not affect feto-maternal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mamaru Mollalign Temesgen
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
| | - Amare Hailekirose Gebregzi
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Habtamu Getinet Kasahun
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Seid Adem Ahmed
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Yophtahe Berhe Woldegerima
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Walsh D, Spiby H, McCourt C, Coleby D, Grigg C, Bishop S, Scanlon M, Culley L, Wilkinson J, Pacanowski L, Thornton J. Factors influencing utilisation of ‘free-standing’ and ‘alongside’ midwifery units for low-risk births in England: a mixed-methods study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr08120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Midwifery-led units (MUs) are recommended for ‘low-risk’ births by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence but according to the National Audit Office were not available in one-quarter of trusts in England in 2013 and, when available, were used by only a minority of the low-risk women for whom they should be suitable. This study explores why.
Objectives
To map the provision of MUs in England and explore barriers to and facilitators of their development and use; and to ascertain stakeholder views of interventions to address these barriers and facilitators.
Design
Mixed methods – first, MU access and utilisation across England was mapped; second, local media coverage of the closure of free-standing midwifery units (FMUs) were analysed; third, case studies were undertaken in six sites to explore the barriers and facilitators that have an impact on the development of MUs; and, fourth, by convening a stakeholder workshop, interventions to address the barriers and facilitators were discussed.
Setting
English NHS maternity services.
Participants
All trusts with maternity services.
Interventions
Establishing MUs.
Main outcome measures
Numbers and types of MUs and utilisation of MUs.
Results
Births in MUs across England have nearly tripled since 2011, to 15% of all births. However, this increase has occurred almost exclusively in alongside units, numbers of which have doubled. Births in FMUs have stayed the same and these units are more susceptible to closure. One-quarter of trusts in England have no MUs; in those that do, nearly all MUs are underutilised. The study findings indicate that most trust managers, senior midwifery managers and obstetricians do not regard their MU provision as being as important as their obstetric-led unit provision and therefore it does not get embedded as an equal and parallel component in the trust’s overall maternity package of care. The analysis illuminates how provision and utilisation are influenced by a complex range of factors, including the medicalisation of childbirth, financial constraints and institutional norms protecting the status quo.
Limitations
When undertaking the case studies, we were unable to achieve representativeness across social class in the women’s focus groups and struggled to recruit finance directors for individual interviews. This may affect the transferability of our findings.
Conclusions
Although there has been an increase in the numbers and utilisation of MUs since 2011, significant obstacles remain to MUs reaching their full potential, especially FMUs. This includes the capacity and willingness of providers to address women’s information needs. If these remain unaddressed at commissioner and provider level, childbearing women’s access to MUs will continue to be restricted.
Future work
Work is needed on optimum approaches to improve decision-makers’ understanding and use of clinical and economic evidence in service design. Increasing women’s access to information about MUs requires further studies of professionals’ understanding and communication of evidence. The role of FMUs in the context of rural populations needs further evaluation to take into account user and community impact.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 12. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Walsh
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Helen Spiby
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Dawn Coleby
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Celia Grigg
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Simon Bishop
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Miranda Scanlon
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Lorraine Culley
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | | | | | - Jim Thornton
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Devkota B, Maskey J, Pandey AR, Karki D, Godwin P, Gartoulla P, Mehata S, Aryal KK. Determinants of home delivery in Nepal - A disaggregated analysis of marginalised and non-marginalised women from the 2016 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0228440. [PMID: 31999784 PMCID: PMC6992204 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In Nepal, a substantial proportion of women still deliver their child at home. Disparities have been observed in utilisation of institutional delivery and skilled birth attendant services. We performed a disaggregated analysis among marginalised and non-marginalised women to identify if different factors are associated with home delivery among these groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study used data from the 2016 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey. It involves the analysis of 3,837 women who had experienced at least one live birth in the five years preceding the survey. Women were categorised as marginalised and non-marginalised based on ethnic group. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to identify factors associated with home delivery. RESULTS A higher proportion of marginalised women delivered at home (47%) than non-marginalised women (26%). Compared to non-marginalised women (35%), a larger proportion of marginalised women (64%) felt that it was not necessary to give birth at health facility. The multivariable analysis indicated an independent association of having no or basic education, belonging to middle, poorer and the poorest wealth quintile, residing in Province 2 and not having completed of four antenatal care visits per protocol with home delivery among both marginalised and non-marginalised women. Whereas residing in a rural area, residing in Province 7, and at a distance of >30 minutes to a health facility were factors independently associated with home delivery only among marginalised women. CONCLUSION We conclude that poor education, poor economic status, non-completion of four ANC visits and belonging to Province 2 particularly determined either group of women to deliver at home, whereas residing in rural areas, living far from health facility, and belonging to Province 7 determined marginalised women to deliver at home. Preventing mothers from delivering at home would thus require focusing on specific geographical areas besides considering wider socio-economic determinants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bikash Devkota
- Policy Planning and Monitoring Division, Ministry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Jasmine Maskey
- DFID Nepal Health Sector Programme 3/Monitoring Evaluation and Operational Research, Abt Associates, Kathmandu, Nepal
- * E-mail: ,
| | - Achyut Raj Pandey
- DFID Nepal Health Sector Programme 3/Monitoring Evaluation and Operational Research, Abt Associates, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Deepak Karki
- UK Department for International Development Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Peter Godwin
- DFID Nepal Health Sector Programme 3/Monitoring Evaluation and Operational Research, Abt Associates, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Pragya Gartoulla
- DFID Nepal Health Sector Programme 3/Monitoring Evaluation and Operational Research, Abt Associates, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Suresh Mehata
- Policy Planning and Monitoring Division, Ministry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Krishna Kumar Aryal
- DFID Nepal Health Sector Programme 3/Monitoring Evaluation and Operational Research, Abt Associates, Kathmandu, Nepal
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Santos NCP, Vogt SE, Duarte ED, Pimenta AM, Madeira LM, Abreu MNS. Factors associated with low Apgar in newborns in birth center. Rev Bras Enferm 2019; 72:297-304. [PMID: 31851267 DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to analyze factors associated with Apgar of 5 minutes less than 7 of newborns of women selected for care at the Center for Normal Birth (ANC). METHOD a descriptive cross-sectional study with data from 9,135 newborns collected between July 2001 and December 2012. The analysis used absolute and relative frequency frequencies and bivariate analysis using Pearson's chi-square test or the exact Fisher. RESULTS fifty-three newborns (0.6%) had Apgar less than 7 in the 5th minute. The multivariate analysis found a positive association between low Apgar and gestational age less than 37 weeks, gestational pathologies and intercurrences in labor. The presence of the companion was a protective factor. CONCLUSION the Normal Birth Center is a viable option for newborns of low risk women as long as the protocol for screening low-risk women is followed.
Collapse
|
12
|
Planned home deliveries in Finland, 1996-2013. J Perinatol 2019; 39:220-228. [PMID: 30425338 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-018-0267-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2018] [Revised: 10/07/2018] [Accepted: 10/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate trends and perinatal outcomes of planned home deliveries in Finland. STUDY DESIGN All infants born in 1996-2013, excluding those born preterm, by operative delivery, and without information on birth mode or gestational age, were studied. The study group included 170 infants born at home as planned, 720,047 infants born at hospital were controls. RESULT The rate of planned home deliveries increased from 8.3 to 39.4 per 100,000. In the study group 63%, containing two perinatal deaths, were not low-risk pregnancies according to national guidelines. The rate of hypothermia, asphyxia, and need of invasive ventilation was increased in low-risk home deliveries. One infant had a major congenital malformation. Maternal outcomes were favorable. CONCLUSION The rate of planned home deliveries increased. Guidelines for low-risk deliveries were not followed in a majority of cases, including two perinatal deaths. Even in low-risk home deliveries, the neonatal morbidity appeared to be increased.
Collapse
|
13
|
Sprague AE, Sidney D, Darling EK, Van Wagner V, Soderstrom B, Rogers J, Graves E, Coyle D, Sumner A, Holmberg V, Khan B, Walker MC. Outcomes for the First Year of Ontario's Birth Center Demonstration Project. J Midwifery Womens Health 2018; 63:532-540. [PMID: 30199126 PMCID: PMC6220984 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2017] [Revised: 05/16/2018] [Accepted: 05/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In 2014, Ontario opened 2 stand-alone midwifery-led birth centers. Using mixed methods, we evaluated the first year of operations for quality and safety, client experience, and integration into the maternity care community. This article reports on our study of safety and quality of care. METHODS This descriptive evaluation focused on women admitted to a birth center at the beginning of labor. For context, we matched this cohort (on a 1:4 basis) with similar low-risk midwifery clients giving birth in a hospital. Data sources included Ontario's Better Outcomes Registry and Network (BORN) Information System, the Canadian Institute for Health Information, Ontario census data, and birth center records. RESULTS Of 495 women admitted to a birth center, 87.9% experienced a spontaneous vaginal birth, regardless of the eventual location of birth, and 7.7% had a cesarean birth. The transport rate to a hospital was 26.3%. When compared with midwifery clients with a planned hospital birth, rates of intervention (epidural analgesia, labor augmentation, assisted vaginal birth, and cesarean birth) were significantly lower in the planned birth center group, even when controlled for previous cesarean birth and body mass index. Markers of potential morbidity were identified in about 10% of birth center births; however, there were no short-term health impacts up to discharge from midwifery care at 6 weeks postpartum. Care was low in intervention and safe (minimal negative outcomes and transport rates comparable to the literature). DISCUSSION In the first year of operation, care was consistent with national guidelines, and morbidity and mortality rates and intervention rates were low for women with low-risk pregnancies seeking a low-intervention approach for labor and birth. Further evaluation to confirm these findings is required as the number of births grows.
Collapse
|
14
|
Davies-Tuck ML, Wallace EM, Davey MA, Veitch V, Oats J. Planned private homebirth in Victoria 2000-2015: a retrospective cohort study of Victorian perinatal data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18:357. [PMID: 30176816 PMCID: PMC6122533 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1996-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The outcomes for planned homebirth in Victoria are unknown. We aimed to compare the rates of outcomes for high risk and low risk women who planned to birth at home compared to those who planned to birth in hospital. METHODS We undertook a population based cohort study of all births in Victoria, Australia 2000-2015. Women were defined as being of low or high risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes according to the eligibility criteria for homebirth and either planning to birth at home or in a hospital setting at the at the onset of labour. Rates of perinatal and maternal mortality and morbidity as well as obstetric interventions were compared. RESULTS Three thousand nine hundred forty-five women planned to give birth at home with a privately practising midwife and 829,286 women planned to give birth in a hospital setting. Regardless of risk status, planned homebirth was associated with significantly lower rates of all obstetric interventions and higher rates of spontaneous vaginal birth (p ≤ 0.0001 for all). For low risk women the rates of perinatal mortality were similar (1.6 per 1000 v's 1.7 per 1000; p = 0.90) and overall composite perinatal (3.6% v's 13.4%; p ≤ 0.001) and maternal morbidities (10.7% v's 17.3%; p ≤ 0.001) were significantly lower for those planning a homebirth. Planned homebirth among high risk women was associated with significantly higher rates of perinatal mortality (9.3 per 1000 v's 3.5 per 1000; p = 0.009) but an overall significant decrease in composite perinatal (7.8% v's 16.9%; p ≤ 0.001) and maternal morbidities (16.7% v's 24.6%; p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION Regardless of risk status, planned homebirth was associated with significantly lower rates of obstetric interventions and combined overall maternal and perinatal morbidities. For low risk women, planned homebirth was also associated with similar risks of perinatal mortality, however for women with recognized risk factors, planned homebirth was associated with significantly higher rates of perinatal mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda L. Davies-Tuck
- The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, Vic, 3168 Australia
- Safer Care Victoria, 50 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne, 3000 Australia
| | - Euan M. Wallace
- The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, Vic, 3168 Australia
- Safer Care Victoria, 50 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne, 3000 Australia
| | - Mary-Ann Davey
- Safer Care Victoria, 50 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne, 3000 Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, Vic, 3168 Australia
| | - Vickie Veitch
- Safer Care Victoria, 50 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne, 3000 Australia
| | - Jeremy Oats
- Consultative Council on Obstetric and Paediatric Mortality and Morbidity (CCOPMM) Department of Health and Human Services, 50 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne, 3000 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Reszel J, Sidney D, Peterson WE, Darling EK, Van Wagner V, Soderstrom B, Rogers J, Graves E, Khan B, Sprague AE. The Integration of Ontario Birth Centers into Existing Maternal-Newborn Services: Health Care Provider Experiences. J Midwifery Womens Health 2018; 63:541-549. [PMID: 30088845 PMCID: PMC6221115 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2017] [Revised: 05/16/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In 2014, 2 freestanding, midwifery-led birth centers opened in Ontario, Canada. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the integration of the birth centers into the local, preexisting intrapartum systems from the perspective of health care providers and managerial staff. METHODS Focus groups or interviews were conducted with health care providers (paramedics, midwives, nurses, physicians) and managerial staff who had experienced urgent and/or nonurgent maternal or newborn transports from a birth center to one of 4 hospitals in Ottawa or Toronto. A descriptive qualitative approach to data analysis was undertaken. RESULTS Twenty-four health care providers and managerial staff participated in a focus group or interview. Participants described positive experiences transporting women and/or newborns from the birth centers to hospitals; these positive experiences were attributed to the collaborative planning, training, and communication that occurred prior to opening the birth centers. The degree of integration was dependent on hospital-specific characteristics such as history, culture, and the presence or absence of midwifery privileging. Participants described the need for only minor improvements to administrative processes as well as the challenge of keeping large numbers of staff updated with respect to urgent transport policies. Planning and opening of the birth centers was seen as a driving force in further integrating midwifery care and improving interprofessional practice. DISCUSSION The collaborative approach for the planning and implementation of the birth centers was a key factor in the successful integration into the existing maternal-newborn system and contributed to improving integrated professional practice among midwives, paramedics, nurses, and physicians. This approach may be used as a template for the integration of other new independent health care facilities and programs into the existing health care system.
Collapse
|
16
|
Minooee S, Simbar M, Sheikhan Z, Alavi Majd H. Audit of Intrapartum Care Based on the National Guideline for Midwifery and Birth Services. Eval Health Prof 2018; 41:415-429. [PMID: 29788769 DOI: 10.1177/0163278718778095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Providing high-quality maternity care is a worldwide health concern that necessitates regular assessment of intrapartum practice. In an observational study, we aimed to audit intrapartum care based on the National Guideline for Midwifery and Birth Services. Using quota sampling, a total of 200 pregnant women, admitted for normal vaginal delivery, were recruited from four educational hospitals in Tehran, Iran. An observational checklist was developed based on the national guideline to assess the quality of provided care. Content and face validity of the tool were checked and confirmed. Reliability of the observational checklist and questionnaire was confirmed using concurrent observation (intrarater reliability; r = .93) and test-retest ( r = .9) methods, respectively. We found that the compatibility of intrapartum care and the national guideline in different domains were as follows: history taking 88.3%, vital sign measurement 64.6%, performing Leopold's maneuver 38.5%, initial assessment 83.4%, labor care 22.5%, using pain relief methods 63.5%, labor progress assessment 71.5%, process of delivery 89.5%, and postpartum management 89.5%. The findings indicate that additional attention and monitoring are required to align current intrapartum care practices with the national guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Minooee
- 1 Midwifery and Reproductive Health Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Masoumeh Simbar
- 2 Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, Midwifery and Reproductive Health Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zohreh Sheikhan
- 1 Midwifery and Reproductive Health Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hamid Alavi Majd
- 3 Faculty of Paramedics, Department of Biostatistics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Contraindications in planned home birth in Iceland: A retrospective cohort study. SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE 2017; 15:10-17. [PMID: 29389494 DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2017.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2015] [Revised: 10/29/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Icelandic national guidelines on place of birth list contraindications for home birth. Few studies have examined the effect of contraindication on home birth, and none have done so in Iceland. The aim of this study was to examine whether contraindications affect the outcome of planned home birth or have a different effect at home than in hospital. METHODS The study is a retrospective cohort study on the effect of contraindications for home birth on the outcome of planned home (n = 307) and hospital (n = 921) birth in 2005-2009. Outcomes were described for four different groups of women, by exposure to contraindications (unexposed vs. exposed) and planned place of birth (hospital vs. home). Linear and logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the effect of the contraindications under study and to detect interactions between contraindications and planned place of birth. RESULTS The key findings of the study were that contraindications were related to higher rates of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, regardless of place of birth; women exposed to contraindications had higher rates of adverse outcomes in planned home birth; and healthy, unexposed women had higher rates of adverse outcomes in planned hospital birth. Contraindications significantly increased the risk of transfer in labour and postpartum haemorrhage in planned home births. CONCLUSION The defined contraindications for home birth had a negative effect on maternal and neonatal outcomes in Iceland, regardless of place of birth. The study results do not contradict the current national guidelines on place of birth.
Collapse
|
18
|
Vieira MC, White SL, Patel N, Seed PT, Briley AL, Sandall J, Welsh P, Sattar N, Nelson SM, Lawlor DA, Poston L, Pasupathy D. Prediction of uncomplicated pregnancies in obese women: a prospective multicentre study. BMC Med 2017; 15:194. [PMID: 29096631 PMCID: PMC5669007 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-017-0956-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND All obese pregnant women are considered at equal high risk with respect to complications in pregnancy and birth, and are commonly managed through resource-intensive care pathways. However, the identification of maternal characteristics associated with normal pregnancy outcomes could assist in the management of these pregnancies. The present study aims to identify the factors associated with uncomplicated pregnancy and birth in obese women, and to assess their predictive performance. METHODS Data form obese women (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) with singleton pregnancies included in the UPBEAT trial were used in this analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify sociodemographic, clinical and biochemical factors at 15+0 to 18+6 weeks' gestation associated with uncomplicated pregnancy and birth, defined as delivery of a term live-born infant without antenatal or labour complications. Predictive performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Internal validation and calibration were also performed. Women were divided into fifths of risk and pregnancy outcomes were compared between groups. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated using the upper fifth as the positive screening group. RESULTS Amongst 1409 participants (BMI 36.4, SD 4.8 kg/m2), the prevalence of uncomplicated pregnancy and birth was 36% (505/1409). Multiparity and increased plasma adiponectin, maternal age, systolic blood pressure and HbA1c were independently associated with uncomplicated pregnancy and birth. These factors achieved an AUROC of 0.72 (0.68-0.76) and the model was well calibrated. Prevalence of gestational diabetes, preeclampsia and other hypertensive disorders, preterm birth, and postpartum haemorrhage decreased whereas spontaneous vaginal delivery increased across the fifths of increasing predicted risk of uncomplicated pregnancy and birth. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 38%, 89%, 63% and 74%, respectively. A simpler model including clinical factors only (no biomarkers) achieved an AUROC of 0.68 (0.65-0.71), with sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 31%, 86%, 56% and 69%, respectively. CONCLUSION Clinical factors and biomarkers can be used to help stratify pregnancy and delivery risk amongst obese pregnant women. Further studies are needed to explore alternative pathways of care for obese women demonstrating different risk profiles for uncomplicated pregnancy and birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matias C Vieira
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.,Núcleo de Formação Específica em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Escola de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 90610-000, Brazil
| | - Sara L White
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Nashita Patel
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Paul T Seed
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Annette L Briley
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Jane Sandall
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Paul Welsh
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK
| | - Naveed Sattar
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK
| | - Scott M Nelson
- School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK
| | - Debbie A Lawlor
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit and School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
| | - Lucilla Poston
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Dharmintra Pasupathy
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK. .,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK. .,Department of Women and Children's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre KHP, St. Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, 10th Floor North Wing, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Karaçam Z, Arslan Kurnaz D, Güneş G. Evaluating the content and quality of intrapartum care in vaginal births: An example of a state hospital. Turk J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 14:10-17. [PMID: 28913129 PMCID: PMC5558312 DOI: 10.4274/tjod.88123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2016] [Accepted: 02/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of the research was to assess the content and quality of the intrapartum care offered in vaginal births in Turkey, based on the example of a state hospital. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between January 1st, 2013 and December 31st, 2014 at Aydın Maternity and Children’s Hospital. The study sample consisted of 303 women giving vaginal birth, who were recruited into the study using the method of convenience sampling. Research data were collected with a questionnaire created by the researchers and assessed using the Bologna score. Numbers and percentages were assessed in the data analysis. Results: The mean age of the women was 25.14±5.37 years and 40.5% had given one live birth. Of the women, 45.2% were admitted to hospital in the latent phase, 76.6% were administered an enema, 3.3% had epidural anesthesia, 2.6% delivered using vacuum extraction, and 54.1% underwent an episiotomy. Some 23.8% of the women experienced spontaneous laceration that needed sutures. The babies of two women exhibited an Apgar score below 7 in the fifth minute. When the quality of the intrapartum care given to the women was assessed with the Bologna score, it was found that 92.7% went into labor spontaneously, 100% of the births were supervised by midwives and doctors, 97.7% of the women had no supporting companion, and the nonsupine position was only used in 0.3% of the women. A partogram was used to follow up on the birth process in 72.6% of the women, and 82.5% achieved contact with their babies within the first hour after birth. Induction was applied in 76.6% of the women and fundal pressure in 27.4%. Conclusion: The study revealed that the quality of intrapartum care in vaginal births was inadequate. Reformulating the guidelines regarding intrapartum care in accordance with World Health Organization recommendations and evidence-based practices may contribute to improving mother and infant health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zekiye Karaçam
- Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Health Sciences, Division of Midwifery, Aydın, Turkey
| | | | - Gizem Güneş
- Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Health Sciences, Division of Midwifery, Aydın, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rowe R, Li Y, Knight M, Brocklehurst P, Hollowell J. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women planning vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) at home in England: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study. BJOG 2016; 123:1123-32. [PMID: 26213223 PMCID: PMC5014182 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare vaginal birth rates in women planning vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) at home versus in an obstetric unit (OU) and explore transfer rates in women planning home VBAC. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING OUs and planned home births in England. POPULATION 1436 women planning VBAC in the Birthplace cohort, including 209 planning home VBAC. METHODS We used Poisson regression to calculate relative risks adjusted for maternal characteristics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES MAIN OUTCOMES (i) vaginal birth and (ii) transfer from planned home birth to OU during labour or immediately after birth. SECONDARY OUTCOMES (i) composite of maternal blood transfusion or admission to higher level care, (ii) stillbirth or Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, (iii) neonatal unit admission. RESULTS Planned VBAC at home was associated with a statistically significant increase in the chances of having a vaginal birth compared with planned VBAC in an OU (adjusted relative risk 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.24). The risk of an adverse maternal outcome was around 2-3% in both settings, with a similar risk of an adverse neonatal outcome. Transfer rates were high (37%) and varied markedly by parity (para 1, 56.7% versus para 2+, 24.6%). CONCLUSION Women in the cohort who planned VBAC at home had an increased chance of a vaginal birth compared with those planning VBAC in an OU, but transfer rates were high, particularly for women with only one previous birth, and the risk of an adverse maternal or perinatal outcome was around 2-3%. No change in guidance can be recommended. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Higher vaginal birth rates in planned VBAC at home versus in OU but 2-3% adverse outcomes and high transfer rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Rowe
- Policy Research Unit in Maternal Health and CareNational Perinatal Epidemiology UnitNuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Y Li
- Policy Research Unit in Maternal Health and CareNational Perinatal Epidemiology UnitNuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - M Knight
- Policy Research Unit in Maternal Health and CareNational Perinatal Epidemiology UnitNuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - P Brocklehurst
- Policy Research Unit in Maternal Health and CareNational Perinatal Epidemiology UnitNuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - J Hollowell
- Policy Research Unit in Maternal Health and CareNational Perinatal Epidemiology UnitNuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hollowell J, Rowe R, Townend J, Knight M, Li Y, Linsell L, Redshaw M, Brocklehurst P, Macfarlane A, Marlow N, McCourt C, Newburn M, Sandall J, Silverton L. The Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study: further analyses to enhance policy and service delivery decision-making for planned place of birth. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2015. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr03360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundEvidence from the Birthplace in England Research Programme supported a policy of offering ‘low risk’ women a choice of birth setting, but a number of unanswered questions remained.AimsThis project aimed to provide further evidence to support the development and delivery of maternity services and inform women’s choice of birth setting: specifically, to explore maternal and organisational factors associated with intervention, transfer and other outcomes in each birth setting in ‘low risk’ and ‘higher risk’ women.DesignFive component studies using secondary analysis of the Birthplace prospective cohort study (studies 2–5) and ecological analysis of unit/NHS trust-level data (studies 1 and 5).SettingObstetric units (OUs), alongside midwifery units (AMUs), freestanding midwifery units (FMUs) and planned home births in England.ParticipantsStudies 1–4 focused on ‘low risk’ women with ‘term’ pregnancies planning vaginal birth in 43 AMUs (n = 16,573), in 53 FMUs (n = 11,210), at home in 147 NHS trusts (n = 16,632) and in a stratified, random sample of 36 OUs (n = 19,379) in 2008–10. Study 5 focused on women with pre-existing medical and obstetric risk factors (‘higher risk’ women).Main outcome measuresInterventions (instrumental delivery, intrapartum caesarean section), a measure of low intervention (‘normal birth’), a measure of spontaneous vaginal birth without complications (‘straightforward birth’), transfer during labour and a composite measure of adverse perinatal outcome (‘intrapartum-related mortality and morbidity’ or neonatal admission within 48 hours for > 48 hours). In studies 1 and 3, rates of intervention/maternal outcome and transfer were adjusted for maternal characteristics.AnalysisWe used (a) funnel plots to explore variation in rates of intervention/maternal outcome and transfer between units/trusts, (b) simple, weighted linear regression to evaluate associations between unit/trust characteristics and rates of intervention/maternal outcome and transfer, (c) multivariable Poisson regression to evaluate associations between planned place of birth, maternal characteristics and study outcomes, and (d) logistic regression to investigate associations between time of day/day of the week and study outcomes.ResultsStudy 1 – unit-/trust-level variations in rates of interventions, transfer and maternal outcomes were not explained by differences in maternal characteristics. The magnitude of identified associations between unit/trust characteristics and intervention, transfer and outcome rates was generally small, but some aspects of configuration were associated with rates of transfer and intervention. Study 2 – ‘low risk’ women planning non-OU birth had a reduced risk of intervention irrespective of ethnicity or area deprivation score. In nulliparous women planning non-OU birth the risk of intervention increased with increasing age, but women of all ages planning non-OU birth experienced a reduced risk of intervention. Study 3 – parity, maternal age, gestational age and ‘complicating conditions’ identified at the start of care in labour were independently associated with variation in the risk of transfer in ‘low risk’ women planning non-OU birth. Transfers did not vary by time of day/day of the week in any meaningful way. The duration of transfer from planned FMU and home births was around 50–60 minutes; transfers for ‘potentially urgent’ reasons were quicker than transfers for ‘non-urgent’ reasons. Study 4 – the occurrence of some interventions varied by time of the day/day of the week in ‘low risk’ women planning OU birth. Study 5 – ‘higher risk’ women planning birth in a non-OU setting had fewer risk factors than ‘higher risk’ women planning OU birth and these risk factors were different. Compared with ‘low risk’ women planning home birth, ‘higher risk’ women planning home birth had a significantly increased risk of our composite adverse perinatal outcome measure. However, in ‘higher risk’ women, the risk of this outcome was lower in planned home births than in planned OU births, even after adjustment for clinical risk factors.ConclusionsExpansion in the capacity of non-OU intrapartum care could reduce intervention rates in ‘low risk’ women, and the benefits of midwifery-led intrapartum care apply to all ‘low risk’ women irrespective of age, ethnicity or area deprivation score. Intervention rates differ considerably between units, however, for reasons that are not understood. The impact of major changes in the configuration of maternity care on outcomes should be monitored and evaluated. The impact of non-clinical factors, including labour ward practices, staffing and skill mix and women’s preferences and expectations, on intervention requires further investigation. All women planning non-OU birth should be informed of their chances of transfer and, in particular, older nulliparous women and those more than 1 week past their due date should be advised of their increased chances of transfer. No change in the guidance on planning place of birth for ‘higher risk’ women is recommended, but research is required to evaluate the safety of planned AMU birth for women with selected relatively common risk factors.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Hollowell
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Rachel Rowe
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - John Townend
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Marian Knight
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Yangmei Li
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Louise Linsell
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maggie Redshaw
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Alison Macfarlane
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City University London, London, UK
| | - Neil Marlow
- Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Christine McCourt
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City University London, London, UK
| | | | - Jane Sandall
- Division of Women’s Health, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|