1
|
Zouch J, Bhimani N, Bussières A, Ferreira ML, Foster NE, Ferreira P. Prognostic Factors and Treatment Effect Modifiers for Physical Health, Opioid Prescription, and Health Care Utilization in Patients With Musculoskeletal Disorders in Primary Care: Exploratory Secondary Analysis of the STEMS Randomized Trial of Direct Access to Physical Therapist-Led Care. Phys Ther 2024; 104:pzae066. [PMID: 38696361 PMCID: PMC11365697 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzae066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aims of the study were to identify prognostic factors associated with health care outcomes in patients with musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions in primary care and to determine whether characteristics associated with choice of care modify treatment effects of a direct-access physical therapist-led pathway in addition to general practitioner (GP)-led care compared to GP-led care alone. METHODS A secondary analysis of a 2-parallel-arm, cluster randomized controlled trial involving general practices in the United Kingdom was conducted. Practices were randomized to continue offering GP-led care or to also offer a direct-access physical therapist-led pathway. Data from adults with MSK conditions who completed the 6-month follow-up questionnaire were analyzed. Outcomes included physical health, opioid prescription, and self-reported health care utilization over 6 months. Treatment effect modifiers were selected a priori from associations in observational studies. Multivariable regression models identified potential prognostic factors, and interaction analysis tested for potential treatment effect modifiers. RESULTS Analysis of 767 participants indicated that baseline pain self-efficacy, pain severity, and having low back pain statistically predicted outcomes at 6 months. Higher pain self-efficacy scores at baseline were associated with improved physical health scores, reduced opioid prescription, and less health care utilization. Higher bodily pain at baseline and having low back pain were associated with worse physical health scores and increased opioid prescription. Main interaction analyses did not reveal that patients' age, level of education, duration of symptoms, or MSK presentation influenced response to treatment, but visual trends suggested those in the older age group proceeded to fewer opioid prescriptions and utilized less health care when offered direct access to physical therapy. CONCLUSIONS Patients with MSK conditions with lower levels of pain self-efficacy, higher pain severity, and presenting with low back pain have less favorable clinical and health care outcomes in primary care. Prespecified characteristics did not modify the treatment effect of the offer of a direct-access physical therapist-led pathway compared to GP-led care. IMPACT Patients with MSK conditions receiving primary care in the form of direct-access physical therapist-led or GP-led care who have lower levels of self-efficacy, higher pain severity, and low back pain are likely to have a less favorable prognosis. Age and duration of symptoms should be explored as potential patient characteristics that modify the treatment response to a direct-access physical therapist-led model of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Zouch
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nazim Bhimani
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - André Bussières
- Département de Chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
- School of Physical & Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Manuela L Ferreira
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nadine E Foster
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Paulo Ferreira
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Musculoskeletal Pain Hub, Charles Perkins Centre, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gottlieb M, Bernard K. Epidemiology of back pain visits and medication usage among United States emergency departments from 2016 to 2023. Am J Emerg Med 2024; 82:125-129. [PMID: 38905718 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2024] [Revised: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Low back pain is a common reason for presentation to the Emergency Department (ED). However, there are limited large-scale, recent data on the epidemiology, disposition, and medication administration for this condition. The objective of this was to assess the incidence, admission rates, medication administrations, and discharge prescriptions among ED visits for low back pain in the United States. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study of ED presentations for low back pain from 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023 using the Epic Cosmos database. All ED visits for adults with low back pain identified by ICD-10 codes were included. Outcomes included admission rates, distribution of opioid, benzodiazepine, (non-benzodiazepine) muscle relaxant, acetaminophen, NSAID, and corticosteroid medications administered in the ED, and distribution of opioid, benzodiazepine, muscle relaxant, and corticosteroid medications given upon discharge. Subgroup analyses were performed by specific medication. RESULTS Of 207,154,419 ED encounters, 12,241,240 (5.9%) were due to back pain with 1,957,299 of these (16.0%) admitted. The admission rate increased over time from 12.8% to 17.1%. The most common medication given in the ED was opioids (40.7%), followed by acetaminophen (37.8%), NSAIDs (22.6%), muscle relaxants (18.4%) benzodiazepines (12.8%), and corticosteroids (5.5%). The most common medications prescribed upon discharge were muscle relaxants (32.1%), followed by opioids (23.2%), corticosteroids (12.2%), and benzodiazepines (3.0%). CONCLUSION Low back pain represents a common reason for presentation to the ED, and admissions have been increasing over time. Opioids remain the most common ED medication, whereas muscle relaxants have arisen as the most common discharge prescription. These findings can help inform health policy decisions, resource allocation, and evidence-based interventions for medication administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Gottlieb
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
| | - Kyle Bernard
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moyo P, Merlin JS, Gairola R, Girard A, Shireman TI, Trivedi AN, Marshall BDL. Association of Opioid Use Disorder Diagnosis with Management of Acute Low Back Pain: A Medicare Retrospective Cohort Analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:2097-2105. [PMID: 38829451 PMCID: PMC11306843 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08799-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Practice guidelines recommend nonpharmacologic and nonopioid therapies as first-line pain treatment for acute pain. However, little is known about their utilization generally and among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) for whom opioid and other pharmacologic therapies carry greater risk of harm. OBJECTIVE To determine the association between a pre-existing OUD diagnosis and treatment of acute low back pain (aLBP). DESIGN Retrospective cohort study using 2016-2019 Medicare data. PARTICIPANTS Fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with a new episode of aLBP. MAIN MEASURES The main independent variable was OUD diagnosis measured prior to the first LBP claim (i.e., index date). Using multivariable logistic regressions, we assessed the following outcomes measured within 30 days of the index date: (1) nonpharmacologic therapies (physical therapy and/or chiropractic care), and (2) prescription opioids. Among opioid recipients, we further assessed opioid dose and co-prescription of gabapentin. Analyses were conducted overall and stratified by receipt of physical therapy, chiropractic care, opioid fills, or gabapentin fills during the 6 months before the index date. KEY RESULTS We identified 1,263,188 beneficiaries with aLBP, of whom 3.0% had OUD. Two-thirds (65.8%) did not receive pain treatments of interest at baseline. Overall, nonpharmacologic therapy receipt was less prevalent and opioid and nonopioid pharmacologic therapies were more common among beneficiaries with OUD than those without OUD. Beneficiaries with OUD had lower odds of receiving nonpharmacologic therapies (aOR = 0.62, 99%CI = 0.58-0.65) and higher odds of prescription opioid receipt (aOR = 2.24, 99%CI = 2.17-2.32). OUD also was significantly associated with increased odds of opioid doses ≥ 90 morphine milligram equivalents/day (aOR = 2.43, 99%CI = 2.30-2.56) and co-prescription of gabapentin (aOR = 1.15, 99%CI = 1.09-1.22). Similar associations were observed in stratified groups though magnitudes differed. CONCLUSIONS Medicare beneficiaries with aLBP and OUD underutilized nonpharmacologic pain therapies and commonly received opioids at high doses and with gabapentin. Complementing the promulgation of practice guidelines with implementation science could improve the uptake of evidence-based nonpharmacologic therapies for aLBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patience Moyo
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
| | - Jessica S Merlin
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Challenges in Managing and Preventing Pain Clinical Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Richa Gairola
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Anthony Girard
- Department of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Theresa I Shireman
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Amal N Trivedi
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Brandon D L Marshall
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sommers S, Wendel S, Greig A, Barbour A, Griffith R, Magdaleno M, Skaggs M, Michael S, Bookman K, Tolle H, Hoppe J. Improved outpatient follow-up after implementation of emergency department-based physical therapy. Acad Emerg Med 2024. [PMID: 38881276 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart Sommers
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Sarah Wendel
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Alex Greig
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Aaron Barbour
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Rebekah Griffith
- Inpatient Rehabilitation Department, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Mark Magdaleno
- Inpatient Rehabilitation Department, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Michael Skaggs
- School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Sean Michael
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Kelly Bookman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Heather Tolle
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jason Hoppe
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grenier JP, Rothmund M. A critical review of the role of manual therapy in the treatment of individuals with low back pain. J Man Manip Ther 2024:1-14. [PMID: 38381584 DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2024.2316393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
The number of low back pain (LBP) cases is projected to increase to more than 800 million by 2050. To address the substantial burden of disease associated with this rise in prevalence, effective treatments are needed. While clinical practice guidelines (CPG) consistently recommend non-pharmacological therapies as first-line treatments, recommendations regarding manual therapy (MT) in treating low back pain vary. The goal of this narrative review was to critically summarize the available evidence for MT behind these recommendations, to scrutinize its mechanisms of action, and propose some actionable steps for clinicians on how this knowledge can be integrated into a person-centered approach. Despite disparate recommendations from CPG, MT is as effective as other available treatments and may be offered to patients with LBP, especially as part of a treatment package with exercise and education. Most of the effects of MT are not specific to the technique. MT and other interventions share several mechanisms of action that mediate treatment success. These mechanisms can encompass patients' expectations, prior experiences, beliefs and convictions, epistemic trust, and nonspecific contextual effects. Although MT is safer than opioids for patients with LBP, this alone is insufficient. Our goal is to encourage clinicians to shift away from outdated and refuted ideas in MT and embrace a person-centered approach rooted in a comprehensive biopsychosocial framework while incorporating patients' beliefs, addressing illness behaviors, and seeking to understand each patient's journey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Pascal Grenier
- Department of Physiotherapy, Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Clinic Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Maria Rothmund
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, University Clinic for Psychiatry II, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fritz JM, Gibson B, Wetter DW, Del Fiol G, Solis V, Ford I, Lundberg K, Thackeray A. Use of implementation mapping in the planning of a hybrid type 1 pragmatic clinical trial: the BeatPain Utah study. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:3. [PMID: 38183154 PMCID: PMC10768478 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00542-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Considerable disparities in chronic pain management have been identified. Persons in rural, lower income, and minoritized communities are less likely to receive evidence-based, nonpharmacologic care. Telehealth delivery of nonpharmacologic, evidence-based interventions for persons with chronic pain is a promising strategy to lessen disparities, but implementation comes with many challenges. The BeatPain Utah study is a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation pragmatic clinical trial investigating telehealth strategies to provide nonpharmacologic care from physical therapists to persons with chronic back pain receiving care in ommunity health centers (CHCs). CHCs provide primary care to all persons regardless of ability to pay. This paper outlines the use of implementation mapping to develop a multifaceted implementation plan for the BeatPain study. METHODS During a planning year for the BeatPain trial, we developed a comprehensive logic model including the five-step implementation mapping process informed by additional frameworks and theories. The five iterative implementation mapping steps were addressed in the planning year: (1) conduct needs assessments for involved groups; (2) identify implementation outcomes, performance objectives, and determinants; (3) select implementation strategies; (4) produce implementation protocols and materials; and (5) evaluate implementation outcomes. RESULTS CHC leadership/providers, patients, and physical therapists were identified as involved groups. Barriers and assets were identified across groups which informed identification of performance objectives necessary to implement two key processes: (1) electronic referral of patients with back pain in CHC clinics to the BeatPain team and (2) connecting patients with physical therapists providing telehealth. Determinants of the performance objectives for each group informed our choice of implementation strategies which focused on training, education, clinician support, and tailoring physical therapy interventions for telehealth delivery and cultural competency. We selected implementation outcomes for the BeatPain trial to evaluate the success of our implementation strategies. CONCLUSIONS Implementation mapping provided a comprehensive and systematic approach to develop an implementation plan during the planning phase for our ongoing hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. We will be able to evaluate the implementation strategies used in the BeatPain Utah study to inform future efforts to implement telehealth delivery of evidence-based pain care in CHCs and other settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04923334 . Registered June 11, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie M Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Dr., Room 391, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
| | - Bryan Gibson
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - David W Wetter
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Center for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Victor Solis
- Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Dr., Room 391, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Isaac Ford
- Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Dr., Room 391, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Kelly Lundberg
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Anne Thackeray
- Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Dr., Room 391, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lin CC, Callaghan BC, Burke JF, Kerber KA, Bicket MC, Esper GJ, Skolarus LE, Hill CE. Prescription Opioid Initiation for Neuropathy, Headache, and Low Back Pain: A US Population-based Medicare Study. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2023; 24:2268-2282. [PMID: 37468023 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
Neuropathy, headache, and low back pain (LBP) are common conditions requiring pain management. Yet little is known regarding whether access to specialists impacts opioid prescribing. We aimed to identify factors associated with opioid initiation among opioid-naïve older adults and evaluate how access to particular specialists impacts prescribing. This retrospective cohort study used a 20% Medicare sample from 2010 to 2017. Opioid initiation was defined as a first opioid prescription filled within 12 months after a diagnosis encounter. Disease-related opioid initiation was defined as a first opioid prescription filled within 7 days following a disease-specific claim. Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations was used to determine the association of patient demographics, provider types, and regional physician specialty density with disease-related opioid initiation, accounting for within-region correlation. We found opioid initiation steadily declined from 2010 to 2017 (neuropathy: 26-19%, headache: 31-20%, LBP: 45-32%), as did disease-related opioid initiation (4-3%, 12-7%, 29-19%) and 5 to 10% of initial disease-related prescriptions resulted in chronic opioid use within 12 months of initiation. Certain specialist visits were associated with a lower likelihood of disease-related opioid initiation compared with primary care. Residence in high neurologist density regions had a lower likelihood of disease-related opioid initiation (headache odds ratio [OR] .76 [95% CI: .63-.92]) and LBP (OR .7 [95% CI: .61-.81]) and high podiatrist density regions for neuropathy (OR .56 [95% CI: .41-.78]). We found that specialist visits and greater access to specialists were associated with a lower likelihood of disease-related opioid initiation. These data could inform strategies to perpetuate reductions in opioid use for these common pain conditions. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents how opioid initiation for opioid-naïve patients with newly diagnosed neuropathy, headache, and LBP varies across providers. Greater access to certain specialists decreased the likelihood of opioid initiation. Future work may consider interventions to support alternative treatments and better access to specialists in low-density regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun Chieh Lin
- Department of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Health Services Research Program, Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Brian C Callaghan
- Health Services Research Program, Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - James F Burke
- Department of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Kevin A Kerber
- Department of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mark C Bicket
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Lesli E Skolarus
- Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Chloe E Hill
- Health Services Research Program, Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reichert M, Sawatsky R, Favel R, Boehme G, Breitkreuz L, Dickie K, Lovo S. Indigenous Community-Directed Needs Assessment for Rehabilitation Therapy Services. Int J Circumpolar Health 2023; 82:2183586. [PMID: 36847560 PMCID: PMC9980157 DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2023.2183586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The eleven Indigenous communities served by the File Hills Qu'Appelle Tribal Council (FHQTC) in Saskatchewan, Canada have experienced a progressive reduction in access to physical and occupational therapy services. A community-directed needs assessment facilitated by FHQTC Health Services was undertaken in the summer of 2021 to identify experiences and barriers of community members in accessing rehabilitation services. Sharing circles were conducted according to FHQTC COVID-19 policies; researchers connected to community members via Webex virtual conferencing software. Community stories and experiences were collected via sharing circles and semi-structured interviews. Data was analysed using an iterative thematic analysis approach with NVIVO qualitative analysis software. An overarching theme of culture contextualised five primary themes: 1) Barriers to Rehabilitation Care, 2) Impacts on Family and Quality of Life, 3) Calls for Services, 4) Strength Based Supports, and 5) What Care Should Look Like. Each theme is comprised of numerous subthemes amassed by stories from community members. Five recommendations were developed to enhance culturally responsive access to local services in FHQTC communities: 1) Rehabilitation Staffing Requirements, 2) Integration with Cultural Care, 3) Practitioner Education and Awareness, 4) Patient and Community-Centered Care, and 5) Feedback and Ongoing Evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Reichert
- School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SKCanada
| | - Rebecca Sawatsky
- School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SKCanada
| | - Rick Favel
- School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SKCanada
| | - Gail Boehme
- All Nations Healing Hospital & File Hills Qu’Appelle Tribal Council Health Services, Fort Qu’Appelle, SKCanada
| | - Lorna Breitkreuz
- All Nations Healing Hospital & File Hills Qu’Appelle Tribal Council Health Services, Fort Qu’Appelle, SKCanada
| | - Kristal Dickie
- All Nations Healing Hospital & File Hills Qu’Appelle Tribal Council Health Services, Fort Qu’Appelle, SKCanada
| | - Stacey Lovo
- School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SKCanada,CONTACT Stacey Lovo School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SKCanada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fenton JJ, Fang SY, Ray M, Kennedy J, Padilla K, Amundson R, Elton D, Haldeman S, Lisi AJ, Sico J, Wayne PM, Romano PS. Longitudinal Care Patterns and Utilization Among Patients With New-Onset Neck Pain by Initial Provider Specialty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:1409-1418. [PMID: 37526092 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE To compare utilization patterns for patients with new-onset neck pain by initial provider specialty. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Initial provider specialty has been associated with distinct care patterns among patients with acute back pain; little is known about care patterns among patients with acute neck pain. METHODS De-identified administrative claims and electronic health record data were derived from the Optum Labs Data Warehouse, which contains longitudinal health information on over 200M enrollees and patients representing a mixture of ages and geographical regions across the United States. Patients had outpatient visits for new-onset neck pain from October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2019, classified by initial provider specialty. Utilization was assessed during a 180-day follow-up period, including subsequent neck pain visits, diagnostic imaging, and therapeutic interventions. RESULTS The cohort included 770,326 patients with new-onset neck pain visits. The most common initial provider specialty was chiropractor (45.2%), followed by primary care (33.4%). Initial provider specialty was strongly associated with the receipt of subsequent neck pain visits with the same provider specialty. Rates and types of diagnostic imaging and therapeutic interventions during follow-up also varied widely by initial provider specialty. While uncommon after initial visits with chiropractors (≤2%), CT, or MRI scans occurred in over 30% of patients with initial visits with emergency physicians, orthopedists, or neurologists. Similarly, 6.8% and 3.4% of patients initially seen by orthopedists received therapeutic injections and major surgery, respectively, compared with 0.4% and 0.1% of patients initially seen by a chiropractor. CONCLUSION Within a large national cohort, chiropractors were the initial provider for a plurality of patients with new-onset neck pain. Compared with patients initially seen by physician providers, patients treated initially by chiropractors or therapists received fewer and less costly imaging services and were less likely to receive invasive therapeutic interventions during follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua J Fenton
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA
- Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA
| | - Shao-You Fang
- Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA
| | - Monika Ray
- Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA
| | - John Kennedy
- Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA
| | - Katrine Padilla
- Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Jason Sico
- Yale University, School of Medicine
- Headache Centers of Excellence Program, Veterans Health Administration, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Patrick S Romano
- Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Foussell I, Negley M, Thompson A, Turner A, Wygal A, Devries A, Hilton C, Pritchard KT. Characteristics of Early Interventions for Pain and Function Following Lower Extremity Joint Replacement: Systematic Review. Occup Ther Health Care 2023; 37:627-647. [PMID: 35654087 PMCID: PMC9715835 DOI: 10.1080/07380577.2022.2066239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Occupational therapy is beneficial among adults with chronic pain; however, occupational therapy interventions addressing earlier phases of pain have not been clearly explicated. This systematic review characterized acute and subacute interventions billable by occupational therapy after hip or knee replacement to improve pain and function. Seven articles met inclusion criteria. Six articles had a low risk of bias. Three intervention types were found: task-oriented exercise, water-based, and modalities. Only task-oriented interventions improved both pain and function one-year after surgery. There are long-term benefits to early task-oriented exercise. Further research is needed to contextualize occupational therapy's role in early pain interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Foussell
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health
Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Marisa Negley
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health
Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Abigail Thompson
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health
Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Andrea Turner
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health
Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Amanda Wygal
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health
Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Alison Devries
- Moody Medical Library, University of Texas Medical Branch,
Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Claudia Hilton
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health
Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Kevin T. Pritchard
- Department of Nutrition, Metabolism, and Rehabilitation
Sciences, School of Health Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch,
Galveston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fritz JM, Gibson B, Wetter DW, Fiol GD, Solis VH, Ford I, Lundberg K, Thackeray A. Use of implementation mapping in the planning of a hybrid type 1 pragmatic clinical trial: the BeatPain Utah study. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3267087. [PMID: 37790359 PMCID: PMC10543377 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3267087/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Considerable disparities in chronic pain management have been identified. Persons in rural, lower income and minoritized communities are less likely to receive evidence-based, nonpharmacologic care. Telehealth delivery of nonpharmacologic, evidence-based interventions for persons with chronic pain is a promising strategy to lessen disparities, but implementation comes with many challenges. The BeatPain Utah study is a hybrid type I effectiveness-implementation pragmatic clinical trial investigating telehealth strategies to provide nonpharmacologic care from physical therapists to persons with chronic back pain receiving care in Community Health Centers (CHCs). CHCs provide primary care to all persons regardless of ability to pay. This paper outlines the use of implementation mapping to develop a multifaceted implementation plan for the BeatPain study. Methods During a planning year for the BeatPain trial we developed a comprehensive logic model including the 5-step implementation mapping process informed by additional frameworks and theories. The five iterative implementation mapping steps were addressed in the planning year; 1) conduct needs assessments for involved groups; 2) identify implementation outcomes, performance objectives and determinants; 3) select implementation strategies; 4) produce implementation protocols and materials; and 5) evaluate implementation outcomes. Results CHC leadership/providers, patients and physical therapists were identified as involved groups. Barriers and assets were identified across groups which informed identification of performance objectives necessary to implement two key processes; 1) electronic referral of patients with back pain in CHC clinics to the BeatPain team; and 2) connecting patients with physical therapists providing telehealth. Determinants of the performance objectives for each group informed our choice of implementation strategies which focused on training, education, clinician support and tailoring physical therapy interventions for telehealth delivery and cultural competency. We selected implementation outcomes for the BeatPain trial to evaluate the success of our implementation strategies. Conclusions Implementation mapping provided a comprehensive and systematic approach to develop an implementation plan during the planning phase for our ongoing hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. We will be able to evaluate the implementation strategies used in the BeatPain Utah study to inform future efforts to implement telehealth delivery of evidence-based pain care in CHCs and other settings. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04923334. Registered June 11, 2021 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04923334.
Collapse
|
12
|
Bise CG, Schneider M, Freburger J, Fitzgerald GK, Switzer G, Smyda G, Peele P, Delitto A. First Provider Seen for an Acute Episode of Low Back Pain Influences Subsequent Health Care Utilization. Phys Ther 2023; 103:pzad067. [PMID: 37379349 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzad067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Costs associated with low back pain (LBP) continue to rise. Despite numerous clinical practice guidelines, the evaluation and treatments for LBP are variable and largely depend on the individual provider. As yet, little attention has been given to the first choice of provider. Early research indicates that the choice of first provider and the timing of interventions for LBP appear to influence utilization. We sought to examine the association between the first provider seen and health care utilization. METHODS Using 2015-2018 data from a large insurer, this retrospective analysis focused on patients (29,806) seeking care for a new episode of LBP. The study identified the first provider chosen and examined the following year of medical utilization. Cox proportional hazards models were calculated using inverse probability weighting on propensity scores to evaluate the time to event and the relationship to the first choice of provider. RESULTS The primary outcome was the timing and use of health care resources. Total health care use was lowest in those who first sought care with chiropractic care or physical therapy. Highest health care use was seen in those patients who chose the emergency department. CONCLUSION Overall, there appears to be an association between the first choice of provider and future health care use. Chiropractic care and physical therapy provide nonpharmacologic and nonsurgical, guideline-based interventions. The use of physical therapists and chiropractors as entry points into the health system appears related to a decrease in immediate and long-term use of health resources. This study expands the existing body of literature and provides a compelling case for the influence of the first provider on an acute episode of LBP. IMPACT The first provider seen for an acute episode of LBP influences immediate treatment decisions, the trajectory of a specific patient episode, and future health care choices in the management of LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher G Bise
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- UPMC Health Plan, Department of Health Economics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael Schneider
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Janet Freburger
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - G Kelley Fitzgerald
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Galen Switzer
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Garry Smyda
- UPMC Health Plan, Department of Health Economics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pamela Peele
- UPMC Health Plan, Department of Health Economics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anthony Delitto
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Office of the Dean, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Crockett K, Lovo S, Irvine A, Trask C, Oosman S, McKinney V, McDonald T, Sari N, Carnegie B, Custer M, McIntosh S, Bath B. Healthcare Access Challenges and Facilitators for Back Pain Across the Rural-Urban Continuum in Saskatchewan, Canada: Cross-Sectional Results From a Provincial-Wide Telephone Survey. Health Serv Insights 2023; 16:11786329231193794. [PMID: 37641592 PMCID: PMC10460467 DOI: 10.1177/11786329231193794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic back pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder, disproportionately affecting rural and Indigenous people. Saskatchewan has a relatively high proportion of rural and Indigenous residents; therefore, understanding barriers and facilitators to accessing healthcare are needed to improve healthcare service delivery. Methods A provincial-wide telephone survey explored experiences and perceived healthcare access barriers and facilitators among 384 Saskatchewan residents who experienced chronic low back pain. Chi-squared tests were performed to determine if people who lived in urban versus rural areas differed in the proportion who had accessed services from various healthcare practitioners. T-test and Mann-Whitney U analyses were conducted to determine differences between urban and rural, and Indigenous and non-Indigenous respondents. Results Of 384 residents surveyed, 234 (60.9%) reported living in a rural location; 21 (5.5%) identified as Indigenous. Wait times (47%), cost (40%), travel (39%), and not knowing how to seek help (37%) were the most common barriers for Saskatchewan residents seeking care, with travel being the only barrier that was significantly different between rural and urban respondents (P ⩽ .001). Not knowing where to go to access care or what would help their low back pain (P = .03), lack of cultural sensitivity (P = .007), and comfort discussing problems with health care professionals (P = .26) were greater barriers for Indigenous than non-Indigenous participants. Top facilitators (>50% of respondents) included publicly funded healthcare, locally accessible healthcare services, and having supportive healthcare providers who facilitate referral to appropriate care, with urban respondents considering the latter 2 as greater facilitators than rural respondents. Telehealth or virtual care (P = .013) and having healthcare options nearby in their community (P = .045) were greater facilitators among Indigenous participants compared to non-Indigenous respondents. Conclusions Rural, urban, Indigenous, and non-Indigenous people report overlapping and unique barriers and facilitators to accessing care for chronic low back pain. Understanding perceived access experiences will assist in developing more effective care models for specific communities or regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Crockett
- School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Stacey Lovo
- School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Alison Irvine
- School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Catherine Trask
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology, & Health, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
- Canadian Centre for Rural and Agricultural Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Sarah Oosman
- School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Veronica McKinney
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Terrence McDonald
- Departments of Family Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Nazmi Sari
- Department of Economics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Bertha Carnegie
- Patient Partner, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Marie Custer
- Patient Partner, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Stacey McIntosh
- Patient Partner, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Brenna Bath
- School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
- Canadian Centre for Rural and Agricultural Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bourassa M, Kolb WH, Barrett D, Wassinger C. Guideline adherent screening and referral: do third year Doctor of Physical Therapy students identify red and yellow flags within descriptive patient cases? a United States based survey study. J Man Manip Ther 2023; 31:253-260. [PMID: 36740949 PMCID: PMC10324444 DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2170743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The need for early detection and appropriate management of flags in physical therapy has been established. The lack of early detection has been shown to lead to poor outcomes such as serious pathology, increased disability, prolonged symptoms, and increased healthcare utilization. OBJECTIVE The main purpose of this survey study was to assess third-year Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students' adherence to clinical practice guidelines specifically in the identification and management of red and yellow flags through a case-based approach. METHODS A survey including three different flag case scenarios was sent to DPT students in 15 geographically diverse physical therapy programs. Previously published case scenarios measuring adherence to practice guidelines were used. Correlational analyses were performed to link student demographic details and guideline adherent management. RESULTS The survey was completed by 64 students. Guideline adherent management was greater for red flags (85%) than yellow flag cases (25% and 42%). No significant relationship was noted between the student details and guideline adherent management. CONCLUSION DPT students may need additional educational content related to yellow flag screening. Educators may consider utilizing published red and yellow flag cases to guide decision-making and highlight best screening practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bourassa
- Department of Rehabilitative Sciences, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, United States
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee
| | - William H. Kolb
- Department of Physical Therapy, Waldron College of Health Sciences, Radford University Carilion, Roanoke, VA, United States
| | - Dustin Barrett
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, School of Health Sciences, Emory & Henry College, Marion, Virginia, United States
| | - Craig Wassinger
- Director of Research and Faculty Development, Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang G, Lu L, Gold LS, Bailey JF. Opioid Initiation Within One Year After Starting a Digital Musculoskeletal (MSK) Program: An Observational, Longitudinal Study with Comparison Group. J Pain Res 2023; 16:2609-2618. [PMID: 37533561 PMCID: PMC10390711 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s412081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In-person, conservative care may decrease opioid use for chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain, but the impact of digitally delivered conservative care on opioid use is unknown. This study examines associations between a digital MSK program and opioid initiation and prescriptions among opioid naive adults with chronic MSK pain. Methods This observational study used commercial medical and pharmacy claims data to compare digital MSK program members to matched physical therapy (PT) patients. Outcomes were any opioid prescriptions and opioid prescriptions per 100 participants within the 12-months after starting a digital MSK program. After propensity-score matching, we conducted multivariate regression models that controlled for demographic, comorbidity, and baseline MSK healthcare use. Results The study included 4195 members and 4195 matched PT patients. For opioid initiation, 7.89% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 7.07%, 8.71%) of members had opioid prescriptions within 12 months after starting the digital MSK program versus 13.64% (95% CI: 12.60%, 14.67%) of matched PT patients (p < 0.001). Members had significantly fewer opioid prescriptions (16.73 per 100 participants; 95% CI: 14.11, 19.36) versus PT patients (22.36 per 100 participants; 95% CI: 19.99, 24.73). Members had lower odds (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.60) of initiating opioids and significantly fewer prescriptions per 100 participants (beta: -6.40, 95% CI: -9.88, -2.93) versus PT patients after controlling for available confounding factors. Conclusion An MSK program that delivers conservative care digitally may be a promising approach for decreasing opioid initiation among individuals with chronic MSK pain given the limitations of the observational design and matching on only available covariates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Wang
- Clinical Research, Hinge Health, Inc, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Louie Lu
- Clinical Research, Hinge Health, Inc, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Laura S Gold
- Clinical Learning, Evidence and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jeannie F Bailey
- Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dune TJ, Griffin A, Hoffman EG, Joyce C, Taege S, Brubaker L, Fitzgerald CM. Importance of internal vaginal pelvic floor muscle exams for women with external lumbar/hip/pelvic girdle pain. Int Urogynecol J 2023; 34:1471-1476. [PMID: 36308537 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05390-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS The relationship between external lumbar, hip, and/or pelvic girdle pain and internal vaginal pelvic floor myofascial pain is not well described. We assessed this relationship in a cohort of adult women. METHODS The cohort included women ≥ 18 years old who received care for external lumbar, hip, and/or pelvic girdle pain (reported or elicited on physical examination) who then underwent internal vaginal myofascial levator ani pain assessments, in a tertiary care Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery pelvic pain clinic over a 2-year period (2013 and 2014). RESULTS The cohort of 177 women had an average age of 44.9±16.0 years, an average body mass index of 27.2±7.0 kg/m2, and the majority (79.2%) were white. Most patients presented with a chief complaint of pelvic (51.4%), vulvovaginal (18.6%), and/or lumbar (15.3%) pain. Women who reported symptoms of lumbar, hip, or pelvic girdle pain were more likely to have pain on vaginal pelvic floor muscle examination than women without this history (OR, 7.24; 95% CI, 1.95-26.93, p=0.003). The majority (85.9%) of women had bilateral internal vaginal pelvic floor myofascial pain on examination. CONCLUSIONS Although participants did not describe "vaginal pelvic floor myofascial pain," the high detection rate for internal vaginal pelvic floor myofascial pain on clinical examination highlights an opportunity to improve treatment planning. These findings suggest that the vaginal pelvic floor muscle examination should be part of the assessment of all women with lumbar, hip, and/or pelvic girdle pain. The relationship between this finding and clinical outcomes following directed treatment warrants additional study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanaka J Dune
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pelvic Floor Unit, Royal Women's Hospital, 20 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
| | - Arianna Griffin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| | - Elizabeth Gunnar Hoffman
- Departments of Medicine and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Cara Joyce
- Department of Health Informatics and Data Science, Loyola University Parkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Susanne Taege
- Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor, Mount Carmel Medical Group, Westerville, OH, USA
| | - Linda Brubaker
- Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Colleen M Fitzgerald
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schmidt C, Borgia M, Zhang T, Gochyyev P, Shireman TI, Resnik L. Initial treatment approaches and healthcare utilization among veterans with low back pain: a propensity score analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:275. [PMID: 36944926 PMCID: PMC10029316 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09207-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid prescriptions for Veterans with low back pain (LBP) persist despite the availability of PT, a lower medical risk treatment option. Patterns of treatment and subsequent healthcare utilization for Veterans with LBP are unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of physical therapy (PT) and opioids and outcomes of spinal surgery and chronic opioid use for Veterans with incident LBP. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study identifying Veterans with a new diagnosis of LBP using ICD codes from the Veterans Administration national database from 2012 to 2017. Veterans were classified into three treatment groups based on the first treatment received within 30 days of incident LBP: receipt of PT, opioids, or neither PT nor opioids. Outcomes, events of spinal surgery and chronic opioid use, were identified beginning on day 31 up to one year following initial treatment. We used propensity score matching to account for the potential selection bias in evaluating the associations between initial treatment and outcomes. RESULTS There were 373,717 incident cases of LBP between 2012 and 2017. Of those 28,850 (7.7%) received PT, 48,978 (13.1%) received opioids, and 295,889 (79.2%) received neither PT or opioids. Pain, marital status and the presence of cardiovascular, pulmonary, or metabolic chronic conditions had the strongest statistically significant differences between treatment groups. Veterans receiving opioids compared to no treatment had higher odds of having a spinal surgery (2.04, 99% CI: 1.67, 2.49) and progressing to chronic opioid use (11.8, 99% CI: 11.3, 12.3). Compared to Veterans receiving PT those receiving opioids had higher odds (1.69, 99% CI: 1.21, 2.37) of having spinal surgery and progressing to chronic opioid use (17.8, 99% CI: 16.0, 19.9). CONCLUSION Initiating treatment with opioids compared to PT was associated with higher odds of spinal surgery and chronic opioid use for Veterans with incident LBP. More Veterans received opioids compared to PT as an initial treatment for incident LBP. Our findings can inform rehabilitation care practices for Veterans with incident LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Schmidt
- Department of Physical Therapy, MGH Institute of Health Professions, 36 1st Avenue, Boston, MA, 02129-4557, USA.
- Providence VA Medical Center, 830 Chalkstone Avenue, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
- Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice: Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
| | - Matthew Borgia
- Providence VA Medical Center, 830 Chalkstone Avenue, Providence, RI, 02912, USA
| | - Tingting Zhang
- Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice: Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA
| | - Perman Gochyyev
- Department of Physical Therapy, MGH Institute of Health Professions, 36 1st Avenue, Boston, MA, 02129-4557, USA
| | - Theresa I Shireman
- Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice: Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA
| | - Linda Resnik
- Providence VA Medical Center, 830 Chalkstone Avenue, Providence, RI, 02912, USA
- Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice: Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Matifat E, Berger Pelletier E, Brison R, Hébert LJ, Roy JS, Woodhouse L, Berthelot S, Daoust R, Sirois MJ, Booth R, Gagnon R, Miller J, Tousignant-Laflamme Y, Emond M, Perreault K, Desmeules F. Advanced practice physiotherapy care in emergency departments for patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial and cost analysis. Trials 2023; 24:84. [PMID: 36747305 PMCID: PMC9900999 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07100-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced practice physiotherapy (APP) models of care where physiotherapists are primary contact emergency department (ED) providers are promising models of care to improve access, alleviate physicians' burden, and offer efficient centered patient care for patients with minor musculoskeletal disorders (MSKD). OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness of an advanced practice physiotherapist (APPT)-led model of care with usual ED physician care for persons presenting with a minor MSKD, in terms of patient-related outcomes, health care resources utilization, and health care costs. METHODS This trial is a multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a cost analysis. Six Canadian EDs (clusters) will be randomized to a treatment sequence where patients will either be managed by an ED APPT or receive usual ED physician care. Seven hundred forty-four adults with a minor MSKD will be recruited. The main outcome measure will be the Brief Pain Inventory Questionnaire. Secondary measures will include validated self-reported disability questionnaires, the EQ-5D-5L, and other health care utilization outcomes such as prescription of imaging tests and medication. Adverse events and re-visits to the ED for the same complaint will also be monitored. Health care costs will be measured from the perspective of the public health care system using time-driven activity-based costing. Outcomes will be collected at inclusion, at ED discharge, and at 4, 12, and 26 weeks following the initial ED visit. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses will be performed using linear mixed models with a random effect for cluster and fixed effect for time. DISCUSSION MSKD have a significant impact on health care systems. By providing innovative efficient pathways to access care, APP models of care could help relieve pressure in EDs while providing efficient care for adults with MSKD. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05545917 . Registered on September 19, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Matifat
- grid.14848.310000 0001 2292 3357Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, University of Montreal Affiliated Research Center, Montréal, Québec Canada
| | - E. Berger Pelletier
- grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - R. Brison
- grid.410356.50000 0004 1936 8331Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario Canada
| | - L. J. Hébert
- grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), Québec, Canada ,grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - J.-S. Roy
- grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), Québec, Canada ,grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - L. Woodhouse
- grid.429997.80000 0004 1936 7531Tufts University School of Medicine, Public Health and Community Medicine, Boston, Arizona USA
| | - S. Berthelot
- grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - R. Daoust
- grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - M.-J. Sirois
- grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - R. Booth
- grid.410356.50000 0004 1936 8331School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario Canada
| | - R. Gagnon
- grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), Québec, Canada ,grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - J. Miller
- grid.410356.50000 0004 1936 8331School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario Canada
| | - Y. Tousignant-Laflamme
- grid.86715.3d0000 0000 9064 6198School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - M. Emond
- grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - K. Perreault
- grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), Québec, Canada ,grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - F. Desmeules
- grid.14848.310000 0001 2292 3357Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, University of Montreal Affiliated Research Center, Montréal, Québec Canada ,grid.14848.310000 0001 2292 3357School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bishop SA, Bath B, Wiechnik C, Mendez I, Johnson R, Lovo S. Use of Virtual Care Strategies to Join Multidisciplinary Teams Evaluating Work-Related Injuries in Rural Residents. Telemed J E Health 2023; 29:116-126. [PMID: 35584260 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Rural injured workers requiring multidisciplinary assessments for musculoskeletal disorders face health access disparities, which include travel to urban centers. Virtual care can enhance access to multidisciplinary team care for musculoskeletal conditions in rural areas. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart audit of 136 multidisciplinary assessment reports of injured workers was conducted. Comprehensive management recommendations from the health care assessment team were extracted for analysis. The health care team used virtual technologies to join with patients and at least one local rural health practitioner in one of three locations. Remote presence robotics (RPR; Xpress Technology™) or laptop-based telehealth was used to complete the assessments. Results: RPR were used in 46% of assessments over two sites, with 54% using laptop-based telehealth at a third site. Frequencies of team members' assessment using technologies were as follows: physical therapist (100%), psychologist (78%), plastic surgeon (8%), and physician (43%). Spine (42%) and shoulder (32%) disorders were the most common problems. Most workers (79%) were 3 or more months postinjury. The most common management recommendation was the need for daily comprehensive rehabilitation care (76%). Travel time was saved by 89% of participants. Conclusions: Virtual care was used to unite multidisciplinary assessment teams for the evaluation of injured rural workers with complex musculoskeletal injuries. Future research recommendations include comparing between virtual and fully in-person multidisciplinary assessment and recommendation findings, and evaluation of patient and practitioner experiences with comprehensive virtual team assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brenna Bath
- School of Rehabilitation Science, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.,Canadian Centre for Health and Safety in Agriculture, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | | | - Ivar Mendez
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Health Sciences, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Rachel Johnson
- Virtual Care and Robotics Program, University of Saskatchewan, Health Sciences, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Stacey Lovo
- School of Rehabilitation Science, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.,Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Health Sciences, Saskatoon, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Harrison JM, Kranz AM, Chen AYA, Liu HH, Martsolf GR, Cohen CC, Dworsky M. The Impact of Nurse Practitioner-Led Primary Care on Quality and Cost for Medicaid-Enrolled Patients in States With Pay Parity. INQUIRY : A JOURNAL OF MEDICAL CARE ORGANIZATION, PROVISION AND FINANCING 2023; 60:469580231167013. [PMID: 37102473 PMCID: PMC10150436 DOI: 10.1177/00469580231167013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
Studies have established that nurse practitioners (NPs) deliver primary care comparable to physicians in quality and cost, but most focus on Medicare, a program that reimburses NPs less than physicians. In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the quality and cost implications of receiving primary care from NPs compared to physicians in 14 states that reimburse NPs at the Medicaid fee-for-service (FFS) physician rate (i.e., pay parity). We linked national provider and practice data with Medicaid data for adults with diabetes and children with asthma (2012-2013). We attributed patients to primary care NPs and physicians based on 2012 evaluation & management claims. Using 2013 data, we constructed claims-based primary care quality measures and condition-specific costs of care for FFS enrollees. We estimated the effect of NP-led care on quality and costs using: (1) weighting to balance observable confounders and (2) an instrumental variable (IV) analysis using differential distance from patients' residences to primary care practices. Adults with diabetes received comparable quality of care from NPs and physicians at similar cost. Weighted results showed no differences between NP- and physician-attributed patients in receipt of recommended care or diabetes-related hospitalizations. For children with asthma, costs of NP-led care were lower but quality findings were mixed: NP-led care was associated with lower use of appropriate medications and higher rates of asthma-related emergency department visits but similar rates of asthma-related hospitalization. IV analyses revealed no evidence of differences in quality between NP- and physician-led care. Our findings suggest that in states with Medicaid pay parity, NP-led care is comparable to physician-led care for adults with diabetes, while associations between NP-led care and quality were mixed for children with asthma. Increased use of NP-led primary care may be cost-neutral or cost-saving, even under pay parity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Grant R. Martsolf
- RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA,
USA
- University of Pittsburgh School of
Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Leung T, Lovo S, Irvine A, Trask C, Oosman S, McKinney V, McDonald T, Sari N, Carnegie B, Custer M, McIntosh S, Bath B. Experiences of Health Care Access Challenges for Back Pain Care Across the Rural-Urban Continuum in Canada: Protocol for Cross-sectional Research. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e42484. [PMID: 36534454 PMCID: PMC9808614 DOI: 10.2196/42484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Back pain is common and costly, with negative impacts on both individuals and the health care system. Rural, remote, and Indigenous populations are at greater risk of experiencing back pain compared to urban and non-Indigenous populations. Potential barriers to health care access among Canadians with chronic back pain (CBP) have been identified; however, no study has used lived experiences of people with CBP to drive the selection, analysis, and interpretation of variables most meaningful to patients. OBJECTIVE The aims of this study are to (1) engage with rural, remote, and urban Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients, health care providers, and health system decision makers to explore lived experiences among people with CBP in Saskatchewan, Canada; (2) cocreate meaningful indicators of CBP care access and effectiveness; and (3) identify program and policy recommendations to overcome access barriers to CBP care. METHODS In phase 1, one-on-one interviews with 30 people with current or past CBP and 10 health care providers residing or practicing in rural, remote, or urban Saskatchewan communities will be conducted. We will recruit Indigenous (n=10) and non-Indigenous (n=20) rural, remote, and urban people. In phase 2, findings from the interviews will inform development of a population-based telephone survey focused on access to health care barriers and facilitators among rural, remote, and urban people; this survey will be administered to 383 residents with CBP across Saskatchewan. In phase 3, phase 1 and 2 findings will be presented to provincial and national policy makers; health system decision makers; health care providers; rural, remote, and urban people with CBP and their communities; and other knowledge users at an interactive end-of-project knowledge translation event. A World Café method will facilitate interactive dialogue designed to catalyze future patient-oriented research and pathways to improve access to CBP care. Patient engagement will be conducted, wherein people with lived experience of CBP, including Indigenous and non-Indigenous people from rural, remote, and urban communities (ie, patient partners), are equal members of the research team. Patient partners are engaged throughout the research process, providing unique knowledge to ensure more comprehensive collection of data while shaping culturally appropriate messages and methods of sharing findings to knowledge users. RESULTS Participant recruitment began in January 2021. Phase 1 interviews occurred between January 2021 and September 2022. Phase 2 phone survey was administered in May 2022. Final results are anticipated in late 2022. CONCLUSIONS This study will privilege patient experiences to better understand current health care use and potential access challenges and facilitators among rural, remote, and urban people with CBP in Saskatchewan. We aim to inform the development of comprehensive measures that will be sensitive to geographical location and relevant to culturally diverse people with CBP, ultimately leading to enhanced access to more patient-centered care for CBP. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/42484.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stacey Lovo
- School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Alison Irvine
- School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Catherine Trask
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems (Medicinteknik och Hälsosystem), School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology, & Health (Kemi, Bioteknologi och Hälsa), Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.,Canadian Centre for Health and Safety in Agriculture, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Sarah Oosman
- School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Veronica McKinney
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Terrence McDonald
- Departments of Family Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Nazmi Sari
- Department of Economics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Bertha Carnegie
- Patient Partner, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Marie Custer
- Patient Partner, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Stacey McIntosh
- Patient Partner, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Brenna Bath
- School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.,Canadian Centre for Health and Safety in Agriculture, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zouch J, Comachio J, Bussières A, Ashton-James CE, dos Reis AHS, Chen Y, Ferreira M, Ferreira P. Influence of Initial Health Care Provider on Subsequent Health Care Utilization for Patients With a New Onset of Low Back Pain: A Scoping Review. Phys Ther 2022; 102:pzac150. [PMID: 36317766 PMCID: PMC10071499 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzac150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this research was to examine the scope of evidence for the influence of a nonmedical initial provider on health care utilization and outcomes in people with low back pain (LBP). METHODS Using scoping review methodology, we conducted an electronic search of 4 databases from inception to June 2021. Studies investigating the management of patients with a new onset of LBP by a nonmedical initial health care provider were identified. Pairs of reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and eligible full-text studies. We extracted health care utilization and patient outcomes and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Two reviewers descriptively analyzed the data and categorized findings by outcome measure. RESULTS A total of 26,462 citations were screened, and 11 studies were eligible. Studies were primarily retrospective cohort designs using claims-based data. Four studies had a low risk of bias. Five health care outcomes were identified: medication, imaging, care seeking, cost of care, and health care procedures. Patient outcomes included patient satisfaction and functional recovery. Compared with patients initiating care with medical providers, those initiating care with a nonmedical provider showed associations with reduced opioid prescribing and imaging ordering rates but increased rates of care seeking. Results for cost of care, health care procedures, and patient outcomes were inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS Prioritizing nonmedical providers at the first point of care may decrease the use of low-value care, such as opioid prescribing and imaging referral, but may lead to an increased number of health care visits in the care of people with LBP. High-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings. IMPACT This scoping review provides preliminary evidence that nonmedical practitioners, as initial providers, may help reduce opioid prescription and selective imaging in people with LBP. The trend observed in this scoping review has important implications for pathways of care and the role of nonmedical providers, such as physical therapists, within primary health care systems. LAY SUMMARY This scoping review provides preliminary evidence that nonmedical practitioners, as initial providers, might help reduce opioid prescription and selective imaging in people with LBP. High-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Zouch
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Josielli Comachio
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - André Bussières
- Department de Chiropractique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Claire E Ashton-James
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Yanyu Chen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Manuela Ferreira
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paulo Ferreira
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Scott-Richardson M, Johnson G, McGlorthan L, Webber R, Kirk K, Giordano N, Kryzek M, Highland K. Development and Implementation of an Online Pain Management Continuing Education Program. Pain Manag Nurs 2022; 23:752-758. [PMID: 35835643 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2022.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple studies indicate a lack of pain management training across a range of healthcare specialties. The online Joint Pain Education Program (OJPEP) was created to provide content covering various topics that range from general pain science to integrative care to pain management. The present study evaluates the feasibility of an interdisciplinary, self-guided, online pain management continuing education program, the OJPEP. PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS A total of 228 learners participted in this study. Of the 228 learners, 58 learners identified as registered nurses and 12 learners identified as nurse practitioners. DESIGN Prospective single-arm education feasibility study. METHODS Potential learners were provided invitations to participate via emails from clinic leadership and postings to hospital intranet websites. Learners registered online and could select up to eight modules, based on the materials developed from a Department of Defense/Veterans Administration project. Learners evaluated their satisfaction with module quality and applicability. RESULTS A variety of providers, predominately non-prescribers, across many health care specialties, registered for modules. Across all modules except one, less than half of participants who registered completed the selected module. Time stamps indicated many learners skipped module content. Of those who completed the continuing education evaluation to obtain certificates, the majority indicated the content was of high-quality, appropriate, and evidence-based. One-third to approximately one-half of learners indicated that they would apply content in their clinical practice. Completion of the intended 3-month follow-up survey was poor. CONCLUSIONS Though modules were acceptable per learner responses, future work is needed to: develop modules that are more engaging (e.g., interactive) and applicable to learners; and improve implementation methods to include dissemination and evaluation metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Scott-Richardson
- Defense and Veterans Centers for Integrative Pain Management, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland; Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
| | - Guinevere Johnson
- Defense and Veterans Centers for Integrative Pain Management, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland; Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Latoya McGlorthan
- Defense and Veterans Centers for Integrative Pain Management, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland; Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Robert Webber
- F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Keri Kirk
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C., USA
| | - Nicholas Giordano
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Monika Kryzek
- Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center, Fort Hood, Texas, USA
| | - Krista Highland
- Defense and Veterans Centers for Integrative Pain Management, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland; Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Shi S, Jiang Y. Does supplemental private health insurance incentivize household risky financial asset investment? Evidence from the China Household Financial Survey. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT 2022; 22:369-421. [PMID: 35359194 DOI: 10.1007/s10754-022-09326-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Private health insurance (PHI) is considered a supplement to public medical insurance schemes in China. To the extent that PHI coverage may offset background risk by decreasing medical expenditure risk, it may also incentivize risky financial behaviors. However, empirical evidence confirming this theory is absent in China. We fill this void by examining the impact of supplemental PHI on household risky financial investment using data from the China Household Financial Survey (CHFS). In the first set of analyses, we used bivariate probit (BVP) models with instrumental variables (IVs) to examine the effects of PHI on the extensive margin of household risky financial investment. In the second set of analyses, we used Tobit models with a two-stage residual inclusion (2SRI) framework to examine the effects of PHI on the corresponding intensive margin. The results indicated that supplemental PHI increased the probability of holding risky financial assets. On top of that, PHI increased the percentage of total financial assets allocated to risky financial investment. Such effects were more pronounced on stocks than on other risky products. Our findings provided evidence that purchasing supplemental PHI in China may increase the risk tolerance of financial investment, and risk attitude is a mediating factor between PHI ownership and risky financial investment behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si Shi
- School of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-Sen University, 66 Gongchang Road, Guangming, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Yawen Jiang
- School of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-Sen University, 66 Gongchang Road, Guangming, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Correale MR, Soever LJ, Rampersaud YR. A Model to Implement Standardized Virtual Care for Low Back Pain Amongst a Large Network of Providers in Urban and Rural Settings. J Prim Care Community Health 2022; 13:21501319221130603. [PMID: 36300425 PMCID: PMC9623358 DOI: 10.1177/21501319221130603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual care (VC) was not routinely offered for
assessment of low back pain (LBP), a highly prevalent, disabling condition.
COVID-19 related healthcare closures resulted in a rapid backlog of patients
referred to a provincial interprofessional LBP program. Without management,
these patients were at high risk of experiencing untoward outcomes. Virtual care
became a logical option. However, many clinicians lacked experience and
confidence with LBP virtual care (LBP-VC); and either were unfamiliar with, or
did not have access to, requisite technology. Multi-stakeholder engagement was
utilized to understand barriers, identify enablers, and ultimately promote VC
for LBP. As a result of the multi-stakeholder engagement, the concept of a
toolkit for LBP-VC, including clinical resources and guidelines, emerged. The
toolkit contains preparatory steps for VC and a standardized approach to virtual
LBP assessment. Key steps in the toolkit have potential applicability to other
musculoskeletal populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcia Rebecca Correale
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON,
Canada,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON,
Canada,Marcia Rebecca Correale, Schroeder
Arthritis Institute, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON
M5T 2S8, Canada.
| | - Leslie Jayne Soever
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON,
Canada,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON,
Canada
| | - Yoga Raja Rampersaud
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON,
Canada,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON,
Canada,Krembil Research Institute, Toronto,
ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Richter RR, Chrusciel T, Salsich G, Austin T, Scherrer JF. Disparities Exist in Physical Therapy Utilization and Time to Utilization Between Black and White Patients With Musculoskeletal Pain. Phys Ther 2022; 102:6649124. [PMID: 35871435 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzac095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Black patients are less likely than White patients to receive physical therapy for musculoskeletal pain conditions. Current evidence, however, is limited to self-reported conditions and health services use. The purpose of this study was to use a large electronic health record database to determine whether a race disparity existed in use of physical therapy within 90 days of a new musculoskeletal diagnosis. METHODS Eligible patients (n = 52,384) were sampled from an Optum deidentified electronic health record database of 5 million adults distributed throughout the United States. In this database, patients were designated as "Black" and "White." Patients were eligible if they had a new diagnosis for musculoskeletal neck, shoulder, back, or knee pain between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were computed before and after adjusting for covariates to estimate the association between race and receipt of physical therapy services within 90 days of musculoskeletal pain diagnoses. RESULTS Patients were on average 47.5 (SD = 14.9) years of age, 12.8% were Black, 87.2% were White, and 52.7% were female. Ten percent of Black patients and 15.5% of White patients received physical therapy services within 90 days of musculoskeletal pain diagnoses. After adjusting for covariates, White patients were 57% more likely (odds ratio = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.44-1.71) to receive physical therapy compared with Black patients and had significantly shorter time to physical therapy than Black patients (hazard ratio = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.42-1.66). CONCLUSIONS In a nationally distributed cohort, Black patients were less likely than White patients to utilize physical therapy and had a longer time to utilization of physical therapy for musculoskeletal pain. IMPACT These findings highlight the need to determine the mechanisms underlying the observed disparities and how these disparities influence health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randy R Richter
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Program in Physical Therapy, Doisy College of Health Sciences, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Timothy Chrusciel
- Department of Health and Clinical Outcomes Research, Salus Center, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,The Advanced HEAlth Data (AHEAD) Research Institute, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Gretchen Salsich
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Program in Physical Therapy, Doisy College of Health Sciences, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Tricia Austin
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Program in Physical Therapy, Doisy College of Health Sciences, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jeffrey F Scherrer
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,The Advanced HEAlth Data (AHEAD) Research Institute, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Carlesso LC, Jafarzadeh SR, Stokes A, Felson DT, Wang N, Frey-Law L, Lewis CE, Nevitt M, Neogi T. Depressive symptoms and multi-joint pain partially mediate the relationship between obesity and opioid use in people with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2022; 30:1263-1269. [PMID: 35700904 PMCID: PMC9419857 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the relation of obesity to opioid use in people with or at risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA), and the extent to which this association is mediated by number of painful joints or depressive symptoms. METHODS We used data from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study, a longitudinal cohort of older adults with or at risk of knee OA. Opioid use was identified by prescription medications and self-report. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. Multi-joint pain was assessed using a standardized body homunculus, and depressive symptoms using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale. We quantified the direct and indirect effect of obesity on opioid use through the number of painful joints or depressive symptoms using causal mediation analysis by natural-effects models. RESULTS We studied 2,335 participants (mean age: 68; mean BMI 31 kg/m2; 60% women). Persons with obesity had ∼50% higher odds of opioid use than those without. Estimates of indirect (mediated) effect by the number of painful joints and depressive symptoms suggested an increased odds of opioid use by 34% (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.70) and 35% (OR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.71), respectively, in obese vs non-obese individuals. The total effect of obesity on opioid use was higher in women than in men. CONCLUSIONS Multi-joint pain and depressive symptoms partially explained greater opioid use among obese persons with knee OA, demonstrating that the negative impact of obesity on knee OA extends beyond its influence on knee pain and structural progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L C Carlesso
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | - A Stokes
- Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - D T Felson
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - N Wang
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center (BEDAC), Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - L Frey-Law
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
| | - C E Lewis
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | - M Nevitt
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - T Neogi
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Clark B, Clark L, Showalter C, Stoner T. A call to action: direct access to physical therapy is highly successful in the US military. When will professional bodies, legislatures, and payors provide the same advantages to all US civilian physical therapists? J Man Manip Ther 2022; 30:199-206. [PMID: 35906773 PMCID: PMC9344959 DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2099893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In 2000, the American PT Association (APTA) published its Vision statement advocating for DA (DA) to PT. This narrative review of the literature aims to identify the current state of DA in the United States (US) and compare that status to the US Military. METHODS Initial PubMed search in the English language with keywords physical therapy (PT), physiotherapy, DA, self-referral, and primary contact from the year 2000 onwards with subsequent focused searches using keywords DA/self-referral/primary contact of physical therapists/physiotherapists on outcomes/autonomous practice/economic impact/patient satisfaction yielded 103 applicable studies on the topic. This paper excluded 40 international articles to focus on US military and civilian research. RESULTS Current literature supports Physical Therapists (PTs) in an initial contact role based on patient safety, satisfaction, access to care, efficiency, healthcare utilization, and potential cost savings. CONCLUSIONS Despite its success in the US Military, DA to PT in the US civilians remains limited and incomplete. PTs still await unrestricted DA and privileges associated with autonomous practice including the ability to order imaging and prescribe some medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryant Clark
- Sentara Therapy Center: Indian River 5660 Indian River Road, Virginia Beach, VA, USA
| | - Lindsay Clark
- Sentara Primary Care and Therapy Center: Oceanfront, Virginia Beach, VA, USA
| | - Chris Showalter
- Maitland-Australian Physiotherapy Seminars, Cutchogue, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Magel J, Bishop MD, Lonnemann E, Cochran G, Fritz JM, West N, Gordon AJ. The association between advanced orthopedic certification and confidence and engagement in prescription opioid medication misuse management practices: a cross-sectional study. J Man Manip Ther 2022; 30:228-238. [PMID: 34784850 PMCID: PMC9344956 DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2021.2000818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In the United States, attaining the orthopedic certified specialist (OCS) credential or the orthopedic subspecialty credential of Fellow of the American Academy of Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapists (FAAOMPT), may lead to a higher level of orthopedic practice. It is unknown whether attaining these credentials influences physical therapist confidence in and frequency of engagement in prescription opioid medication misuse (POMM) management practices. A national cross-sectional web-based survey of PTs identified whether respondents had an OCS or FAAOMPT credential. Self-report confidence in POMM-related management practices and the frequency of engaging in these practices were assessed. Logistic regression evaluated association between credential status and confidence in, and frequency of, engagement in POMM-related management practices. The analysis included 402 respondents with a mean age of 41.0 (SD = 11.2) and 203 (50.4%) females. There were 91 (22.6%) PTs with a FAAOMPT credential, 143 (35.6%) with an OCS but with no FAAOMPT credential and 168 (41.8%) had neither credential. Compared to those with an OCS credential, FAAOMPTs reported greater confidence in, and greater frequency of engagement in, POMM-related management practices (p< .05). Compared to those without an OCS or FAAOMPT credential and compared to those with an FAAOMPT credential, those with an OCS did not report greater confidence or greater engagement in any POMM-related management practice (p≥ .05). Obtain the FAAOMPT credential may increase PTs' confidence in some POMM-related management practices. Research is needed to determine why FAAOMPTs report greater confidence and engagement in POMM-related management practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Magel
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Mark D. Bishop
- Department of Physical Therapy Center for Pain Research and Behavioral Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Elaine Lonnemann
- Transitional Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, College of Health Sciences, University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences, St. Augustine, Fl, United States
| | - Gerald Cochran
- Program for Addiction, Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA) and Greater intermountain Node (GIN) of the NIDA clinical Trials Network, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine and Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center of Innovation, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Julie M. Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Nancy West
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Adam J. Gordon
- Program for Addiction, Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA) and Greater intermountain Node (GIN) of the NIDA clinical Trials Network, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine and Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center of Innovation, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Alhowimel A, Alodaibi F, Alotaibi M, Alamam D, Fritz J. Comparison of attitudes and beliefs of physical therapists and primary care physicians regarding low back pain management: A cross-sectional study. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2022; 35:803-809. [PMID: 34657870 PMCID: PMC9398080 DOI: 10.3233/bmr-200295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The first-line contact for patients seeking care for low back pain (LBP) can potentially change the disease course. The beliefs and attitudes of healthcare providers (HCPs) can influence LBP management. Although referring patients with LBP to physical therapy is common, the first-line contact for patients with LBP in Saudi Arabia is the primary care physician (PCP). Physical therapy will soon be integrated into primary care; therefore, it is rational to compare physical therapists' (PTs) beliefs and attitudes regarding LBP with those of PCPs. OBJECTIVE We compared PCPs' and PTs' attitudes and beliefs regarding LBP management. METHODS We employed a cross-sectional, voluntary response sample research design using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS). Participants were PTs and PCPs practicing in Saudi Arabia. RESULTS In total, 153 participants completed the PABS (111 PTs and 52 PCPs). PCPs demonstrated significantly higher PABS biomedical subscale scores than did the PTs. CONCLUSIONS HCPs in Saudi Arabia should receive additional training to adopt a biopsychosocial approach to managing LBP. In this study, the HCPs' treatment recommendations may not correspond with contemporary clinical guidelines. Research to facilitate the implementation of optimal professional education and training to adopt a biopsychosocial approach is an urgent priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Alhowimel
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia,Corresponding author: Ahmed Alhowimel, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, AlKharj 11942, Saudi Arabia. Tel.: +966 115886354; E-mails: ;
| | - Faris Alodaibi
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mazyad Alotaibi
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dalyah Alamam
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Julie Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Pritchard KT, Downer B, Raji MA, Baillargeon J, Kuo YF. Incident Functional Limitations Among Community-Dwelling Adults Using Opioids: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Propensity Analysis with the Health and Retirement Study. Drugs Aging 2022; 39:559-571. [PMID: 35713791 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-022-00953-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid analgesics are commonly used to manage pain; however, it is unclear how they affect patient function. This study examines the association between opioid analgesics and incident limitations in activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), and cognitive functioning among community-dwelling older adults. METHODS Data included 10,003 participants of the 2016 and 2018 waves of the Health and Retirement Study, which sampled US adults aged 51-98 years. The primary exposure was self-reported opioid pain medication use in 2016. Outcomes included incident limitations in ADL, IADL, and cognitive functioning in 2018. Statistical methods adjusted for confounding using multivariable logistic regressions, inverse probability of treatment weighting, and propensity scores. RESULTS Opioid use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.68) was associated with a statistically significant higher odds of incident ADL limitation in multivariable regression and in propensity score adjustment (aOR: 1.41, 95% CI 1.13-1.76). The association between opioid use and ADL and IADL limitations was modified by age. Adults aged < 65 years had a higher odds of incident ADL (aOR: 1.83, 95% CI 1.38-2.42) and IADL (aOR: 1.42, 95% CI 1.06-1.90) limitations compared with those aged ≥ 65 years. CONCLUSIONS Community-dwelling adults using opioid analgesics to manage pain may be at risk for incident ADL limitations. Middle-aged adults, compared with those older than 65 years of age, experienced the greatest odds for incident ADL and IADL limitations following opioid use. According to sensitivity analyses, our findings were robust to unmeasured confounding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin T Pritchard
- Department of Nutrition, Metabolism, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555-1137, USA.
| | - Brian Downer
- Department of Nutrition, Metabolism, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555-1137, USA
| | - Mukaila A Raji
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Jacques Baillargeon
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Yong-Fang Kuo
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Acharya M, Chopra D, Smith AM, Fritz JM, Martin BC. Associations Between Early Chiropractic Care and Physical Therapy on Subsequent Opioid Use Among Persons With Low Back Pain in Arkansas. J Chiropr Med 2022; 21:67-76. [PMID: 35774633 PMCID: PMC9237579 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to estimate the association between early use of physical therapy (PT) or chiropractic care and incident opioid use and long-term opioid use in individuals with a low back pain (LBP) diagnosis. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from Arkansas All Payers' Claims Database. Adults with incident LBP diagnosed in primary care or emergency departments between July 1, 2013, and June 30, 2017, were identified. Participants were required to be opioid naïve in the 6-month baseline period and without cancer, cauda equina syndrome, osteomyelitis, lumbar fracture, and paraplegia/quadriplegia in the entire study period. PT and chiropractic treatment were documented over the ensuing 30 days starting on the date of LBP. Any opioid use and long-term opioid use (LTOU) in 1-year follow-up were assessed. Multivariable logistic regressions controlling for covariates were estimated. Results A total of 40 929 individuals were included in the final sample, with an average age of 41 years and 65% being women. Only 5% and 6% received PT and chiropractic service, respectively, within the first 30 days. Sixty-four percent had incident opioid use, and 4% had LTOU in the follow-up period. PT was not associated with incident opioid use (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.18) or LTOU (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.97-1.45). Chiropractic care decreased the odds of opioid use (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.97) and LTOU (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.40-0.77). Conclusion In this study we found that receipt of chiropractic care, though not PT, may have disrupted the need for opioids and, in particular, LTOU in newly diagnosed LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahip Acharya
- Division of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Divyan Chopra
- Division of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Allen M. Smith
- Division of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Julie M. Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Bradley C. Martin
- Division of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas,Corresponding author: Bradley C. Martin, PharmD, PhD, 4301 West Markham Street, Slot 522, Little Rock, AR 72205
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Harwood KJ, Pines JM, Andrilla CHA, Frogner BK. Where to start? A two stage residual inclusion approach to estimating influence of the initial provider on health care utilization and costs for low back pain in the US. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:694. [PMID: 35606781 PMCID: PMC9128255 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08092-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnostic testing and treatment recommendations can vary when medical care is sought by individuals for low back pain (LBP), leading to variation in quality and costs of care. We examine how the first provider seen by an individual at initial diagnosis of LBP influences downstream utilization and costs. METHODS Using national private health insurance claims data, individuals age 18 or older were retrospectively assigned to cohorts based on the first provider seen at the index date of LBP diagnosis. Exclusion criteria included individuals with a diagnosis of LBP or any serious medical conditions or an opioid prescription recorded in the 6 months prior to the index date. Outcome measures included use of imaging, back surgery rates, hospitalization rates, emergency department visits, early- and long-term opioid use, and costs (out-of-pocket and total costs of care) twelve months post-index date. We used a two-stage residual inclusion (2SRI) estimation approach comparing copay for the initial provider visit and differential distance as the instrumental variable to reduce selection bias in the choice of first provider, controlling for demographics. RESULTS Among 3,799,593 individuals, cost and utilization varied considerably based on the first provider seen by the patient. Copay and differential distance provided similar results, with copay preserving a greater sample size. The frequency of early opioid prescription was significantly lower when care began with an acupuncturist or chiropractor, and highest for those who began with an emergency medicine physician or advanced practice registered nurse (APRN). Long-term opioid prescriptions were low across most providers except physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians and APRNs. The frequency and time to serious illness varied little across providers. Total cost of care was lowest when starting with a chiropractor ($5093) or primary care physician ($5660), and highest when starting with an orthopedist ($9434) or acupuncturist ($9205). CONCLUSION The first provider seen by individuals with LBP was associated with large differences in health care utilization, opioid prescriptions, and cost while there were no differences in delays in diagnosis of serious illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth J Harwood
- College of Health and Education, Marymount University, Arlington, VA, USA.
| | | | - C Holly A Andrilla
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Bianca K Frogner
- Center for Health Workforce Studies, Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Etheridge T, Bostick GP, Hoens AM, Holly J, Ippersiel P, Bobos P, Arumugam V, Woods S, Gielen S, Woznowski-Vu A, Campbell N. Barriers to Physiotherapists’ Use of Professional Development Tools for Chronic Pain: A Knowledge Translation Study. Physiother Can 2022. [DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2020-0148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: The Pain Science Division (PSD) is a special interest group of the Canadian Physiotherapy Association that serves physiotherapists who have an interest in better understanding and managing patients’ pain. The PSD developed evidence-based resources for its members with the goal of improving patient care by supporting professional development. However, online metrics tracking access to these resources indicated that access was low. The purpose of this study was to identify the barriers PSD members encountered to the use of PSD resources and to recommend interventions to address these barriers guided by the Theory and Techniques Tool (TTT). Method: We distributed an online survey to PSD members across Canada. We used the TTT, a knowledge translation tool, to guide the design of the questionnaire and identify actionable findings. Results: Response rates from 621 non-student members and 1,470 student members were 26.9% and 1.4%, respectively. Based on the frequency of practicing physiotherapists’ ( N = 167) agreement with items in the TTT, the primary barriers to use of the PSD resources were forgetting that the resources were available and forgetting to use them. Conclusions: The TTT can be used to identify barriers to use of professional development tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tori Etheridge
- Centre for Neurology Studies, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
- Pain Science Division, Canadian Physiotherapy Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Geoff P. Bostick
- Pain Science Division, Canadian Physiotherapy Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Alison M. Hoens
- Department of Physical Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Janet Holly
- Pain Science Division, Canadian Physiotherapy Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick Ippersiel
- Pain Science Division, Canadian Physiotherapy Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pavlos Bobos
- Pain Science Division, Canadian Physiotherapy Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Applied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vanitha Arumugam
- Pain Science Division, Canadian Physiotherapy Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Pain Management Program, St. Joseph Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Arthur Woznowski-Vu
- Pain Science Division, Canadian Physiotherapy Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Aranke M, McCrudy G, Rooney K, Patel K, Lee CA, Hasoon J, Urits I, Viswanath O, Kaye AD. Minimally Invasive and Conservative Interventions for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Review of Recent Literature. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2022; 14:31915. [DOI: 10.52965/001c.31915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Grace McCrudy
- LSU Health Sciences Center Shreveport School of Medicine
| | - Kelsey Rooney
- LSU Health Sciences Center Shreveport School of Medicine
| | - Kunaal Patel
- LSU Health Sciences Center Shreveport School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tatta J, Nijs J, Elma Ö, Malfliet A, Magnusson D. The Critical Role of Nutrition Care to Improve Pain Management: A Global Call to Action for Physical Therapist Practice. Phys Ther 2022; 102:6492043. [PMID: 35023558 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Physical therapists have unique education in the comprehensive biopsychosocial assessment and treatment of chronic pain and its mechanisms. Recently, physical therapists have raised awareness regarding the impact of nutrition on promoting health and managing noncommunicable diseases. Robust evidence supports the implementation of nutrition in physical therapist education and practice. Of particular interest for the physical therapist are investigations that use dietary interventions for the treatment of chronic pain. Yet physical therapists have received little guidance regarding their role in nutrition care for pain management and may pass on opportunities to counsel their patients on the connection between nutrition and pain. Therefore, a clinical paradigm shift and unified voice within the profession is called on to encourage physical therapists to develop tailored multimodal lifestyle interventions that include nutrition care for the management of chronic pain. This Perspective describes evidence supporting the implementation of nutrition care in physical therapist practice, supports the role of nutritional pain management for physical therapists, and encourages the use of nutrition care for primary, secondary, tertiary, prevention, health promotion, and wellness related to chronic pain. To achieve these aims, this Perspective offers suggestions for how physical therapists can (1) enhance clinical decision making; (2) expand professional, jurisdictional, and personal scope of practice; (3) evolve entry-level education; and (4) stimulate new investigations in nutrition care and pain science research. In doing so, physical therapists can assert their role throughout the pain management continuum, champion innovative research initiatives, and enhance public health by reducing the impact of chronic pain. IMPACT The nutrition care process for pain management is defined as the basic duty to provide adequate and appropriate nutrition education and counseling to people living with pain. Including the nutrition care process as part of a multimodal approach to pain management provides an opportunity for physical therapists to assert their role throughout the pain management continuum. This includes championing innovative research initiatives and enhancing public health by reducing the impact of chronic pain for over 50 million Americans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe Tatta
- Integrative Pain Science Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jo Nijs
- Integrative Pain Science Institute, New York, New York, USA.,Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Sweden. University of Gothenburg Center for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ömer Elma
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anneleen Malfliet
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.,Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dawn Magnusson
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation-Physical Therapy Program, University of Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Halfpap J, Riebel L, Tognoni A, Coller M, Sheu RG, Rosenthal MD. Improving Access and Decreasing Healthcare Utilization for Patients With Acute Spine Pain: Five-Year Results of a Direct Access Clinic. Mil Med 2022; 188:usac064. [PMID: 35284938 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usac064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spine pain is one of the largest and costliest burdens to our healthcare systems. While evidence-based guidelines for spine pain have been established, and continue to evolve, the actual management of this condition continues to burden the healthcare system. This has led to increased costs due to inefficient entry to healthcare, utilization of treatments unsupported by clinical guidelines, and patient navigation through our healthcare systems. The purpose of this study was to assess the healthcare utilization and related outcomes for Active Duty Service Members (ADSM) receiving healthcare services in a novel acute spine pain clinic (ASPC) during the first 5 years of operation at a large Military Treatment Facility. MATERIALS AND METHODS In 2014 the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy (PT) services designed a novel acute spine clinic intended to directly receive ADSM with acute spine symptoms for an initial evaluation by a Physical Therapist. The inclusion criteria into the ASPC were: ADSM, pain less than or equal to 7 days, no more than three prior episodes of acute spine pain in the past 3 years, and not currently receiving care from Chiropractic, Pain Management, or PT services. The exclusion criteria were: significant and/or progressive neurological deficits, bowel or bladder dysfunction, unstable vital signs or fever, hematuria or extensive trauma. RESULTS A total of 1,215 patients presented to the ASPC for evaluation between 2014 and 2019. The most common chief complaint was acute pain in the lumbar spine (73%), followed by cervical spine pain (15%), and thoracic spine pain (12%) represented the fewest. The average number of PT visits per patient was 3.5 (range 1-13) with 61.1% utilizing three or fewer visits. Over 95% of cases returned to work the same day as their initial evaluation. Sixty-six percent returned to work without restriction the same day as their initial evaluation. Light duty recommendations were provided to 412 (33.9%) patients ranging from one to 30 days, with greater than 85% of the light duty being less than 14 days. Recommendations to not return to work (sick-in-quarters) were issued to 56 (4.6%) patients. The sick-in-quarters recommendations were for a 24-hour period in 48 cases, 48 hours for seven cases, and 72 hours for one case. All encounters in which the patient first sought care at the ASPC for low back pain met the Healthcare Effectiveness Data Set standard for low back pain care of having no imaging within 28 days of the first encounter for nonspecific low back pain. A medical record review of 100 randomly selected patients within 12 months of the initial evaluation demonstrated decreased utilization of medication, imaging, and referral to surgical services. CONCLUSIONS This innovative approach demonstrates the potential benefits of rapid access to treatment and education for patients with acute spine pain by a Physical Therapist. Modeling this approach at Military Treatment Facilities may lead to decreased utilization of medications, radiology services, specialty care referrals, and reduced cost of care provided to individuals with acute spine pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josh Halfpap
- Bowling Green State University, College of Health and Human Services, Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Bowling Green, OH, USA
- Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, CA 92134, USA
| | - Laura Riebel
- Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation Team, Naval Medical Readiness and Training Command Great Lakes, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA
| | - Angela Tognoni
- Department of Physical Therapy, Scripps Mercy Hospital San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103, USA
| | - Michael Coller
- Bowling Green State University, College of Health and Human Services, Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Bowling Green, OH, USA
- Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, CA 92134, USA
| | - Robert G Sheu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, CA 92134, USA
| | - Michael D Rosenthal
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, College of Allied Health Professions, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bolton R, Ritter G, Highland K, Larson MJ. The relationship between capacity and utilization of nonpharmacologic therapies in the US Military Health System. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:312. [PMID: 35255912 PMCID: PMC8900315 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07700-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Nonpharmacologic therapies (NPTs) are recommended as first-line treatments for pain, however the impact of expanding professional capacity to deliver these therapies on use has not been extensively studied. We sought to examine whether an effort by the US Military Health System (MHS) to improve access to NPTs by expanding professional capacity increased NPT utilization in a cohort at higher risk for pain – Army soldiers returning from deployment. Methods Our study involved secondary analysis of MHS workforce data derived from the Defense Medical Human Resources System Internet (DMHRSi), and healthcare utilization data obtained from two ambulatory record systems of the Military Health System (MHS) for a sample of 863,855 Army soldiers previously deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan over a 10-year period (2008–2017). We measured clinical provider capacity in three occupational groups responsible for pain management at 130 military treatment facilities (MTFs): physical therapy, chiropractic, and behavioral health, measured annually as full-time equivalence per 100,000 patients served at each MTF. Utilization in both direct and purchased care settings was measured as annual mean NPT users per 1000 sample members and mean encounters per NPT user. Generalized estimating equation models estimated the associations of facility-level occupational capacity measures and facility-level utilization NPT measures. Results In 2008, nearly all MTFs had some physical therapist and behavioral health provider capacity, but less than half had any chiropractor capacity. The largest increase in capacity from 2008 to 2017 was for chiropractors (89%) followed by behavioral health providers (77%) and physical therapists (37%). Models indicated that increased capacity of physical therapists and chiropractors were associated with significantly increased utilization of six out of seven NPTs. Acupuncture initiation was associated with capacity increases in each occupation. Increased professional capacity in MTFs was associated with limited but positive effects on NPT utilization in purchased care. Conclusions Increasing occupational capacity in three professions responsible for delivering NPTs at MTFs were associated with growing utilization of seven NPTs in this Army sample. Despite increasing capacity in MTFs, some positive associations between MTF capacity and purchased care utilization suggest an unmet need for NPTs. Future research should examine if these changes lead to greater receipt of guideline-concordant pain management. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07700-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rendelle Bolton
- The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, MA, 02453, Waltham, USA. .,US Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, 200 Springs Road, Bedford, MA, 01730, USA.
| | - Grant Ritter
- The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, MA, 02453, Waltham, USA
| | - Krista Highland
- Department of Anesthesiology, Defense and Veterans Center for Integrative Pain Management, Uniformed Services University, 11300 Rockville Pike, Suite 709, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA.,Henry M. Jackson Foundation, 11300 Rockville Pike, Suite 709, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA
| | - Mary Jo Larson
- The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, MA, 02453, Waltham, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Effect of Patient Use of Physical Therapy After Referral for Musculoskeletal Conditions on Future Medical Utilization: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2022; 44:621-636. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
40
|
Peurois M, Chopin M, Texier-Legendre G, Angoulvant C, Bellanger W, Bègue C, Ramond-Roquin A. To which non-physician health professionals do French general practitioners refer their patients to and what factors are associated with these referrals? Secondary analysis of the French national cross-sectional ECOGEN study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:25. [PMID: 34983505 PMCID: PMC8729109 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07285-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multiprofessional practice is a key component in primary care. Examining general practitioner (GP) referral frequency to non-physician health professionals (NPHP) can provide information about how primary care is organised and works which is useful for policymakers. Our study aimed to describe French GP referral frequency to various NPHPs in France and identify associated factors. Methods This is an ancillary study to the observational, cross-sectional (ECOGEN) study conducted in 2011/2012 in France among 128 GPs. Data about consultations using the standardised International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-2), and patient and GP characteristics were collected from 20,613 GP consultations. Referrals were identified through inductive and deductive approaches using ICPC-2 codes, keywords, and deep, open manual searches. Referral frequency was described overall and per NPHP. Patient, GP, and consultation-related factors associated with referral rates were described for the three most frequently identified NPHPs. To minimise potential sources of bias, this observational study followed the STROBE guidelines. Results French GPs referred 6.8% of patients to NPHPs, with physiotherapists, podiatrists, and nurses accounting for 85.2% of referrals. Older patients, retired patients, multiple health problems managed, and longer consultation durations were found to be associated with higher referral rates (p < 0.001). Specific trends were observed for nurse, physiotherapist, and podiatrist referrals. Women (p < 0.001) and regular patients (p = 0.002) were more likely to receive physiotherapy referrals while people with no professional activity were less likely (p < 0.001). Female GPs and those working in urban practices were more likely to issue a physiotherapy referral (p < 0.001), while GPs working in rural practices (p < 0.001) and those with higher annual consultation numbers (p = 0.002) were more likely to refer to a nurse. Working in multiprofessional centres appeared to have little impact on referral rates, being only slightly associated with podiatrist referrals (p = 0.003). Conclusions Referral frequency is more associated with patient characteristics and clinical situations than GP-related factors suggesting patients needing referral most are most often referred. Furthermore, the three NPHPs that GPs refer to the most are those for which a referral is required for reimbursement in France, suggesting that health system legislation and NPHP reimbursement are strong determinants for referrals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthieu Peurois
- Département de médecine générale, Univ Angers, F-49000, Angers, France
| | - Matthieu Chopin
- Département de médecine générale, Univ Angers, F-49000, Angers, France
| | | | - Cécile Angoulvant
- Département de médecine générale, Univ Angers, F-49000, Angers, France
| | - William Bellanger
- Département de médecine générale, Univ Angers, F-49000, Angers, France
| | - Cyril Bègue
- Département de médecine générale, Univ Angers, F-49000, Angers, France.,Univ Angers, Univ Rennes, EHESP, Inserm, IRSET-ESTER, SFR ICAT, F-49000, Angers, France
| | - Aline Ramond-Roquin
- Département de médecine générale, Univ Angers, F-49000, Angers, France. .,Univ Angers, Univ Rennes, EHESP, Inserm, IRSET-ESTER, SFR ICAT, F-49000, Angers, France. .,Département de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Childs JD, Benz LN, Arellano A, Briggs AA, Walker MJ. Challenging Assumptions About the Future Supply and Demand of Physical Therapists in the United States. Phys Ther 2022; 102:6397776. [PMID: 34662413 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
42
|
Vader K, Ashcroft R, Bath B, Décary S, Deslauriers S, Desmeules F, Donnelly C, Perreault K, Richardson J, Wojkowski S, Miller J. Physiotherapy Practice in Primary Health Care: A Survey of Physiotherapists in Team-Based Primary Care Organizations in Ontario. Physiother Can 2022; 74:86-94. [PMID: 35185252 PMCID: PMC8816364 DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2020-0060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: This study describes (1) the current state of physiotherapy practice in team-based primary care organizations in Ontario, (2) the perceived barriers to and facilitators of providing physiotherapy services, and (3) recommendations for improving how these services are provided. Method: This was a cross-sectional, web-based survey. We analyzed the responses using descriptive statistics and summative content analysis. Results: A total of 66 responses were received, and 61 were included in the final analysis. The respondents reported that most of their practice was directed toward musculoskeletal care, followed by multi-system, neurological, and cardiorespiratory conditions, and that most of their direct patient care was focused on in-person, one-to-one assessment or follow-up. Frequently identified barriers to providing physiotherapy services included a lack of space, resources, time, and equipment. The most common facilitators were support from management, recognition and support from other health care providers about the value and role of physiotherapists, and appropriate referrals from other health care providers. The most common recommendation was to increase the physiotherapist-to-patient ratio at primary care sites. Conclusions: Physiotherapists provide care to diverse populations in team-based primary care, which is influenced by specific barriers and facilitators. Our results highlight opportunities for physiotherapists in this context, such as increasing the provision of first-contact care and group-based interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle Vader
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, Chronic Pain Clinic, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachelle Ashcroft
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brenna Bath
- School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Simon Décary
- Research Centre in Primary Care in Health and Social Services, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Simon Deslauriers
- Department of Rehabilitation, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - François Desmeules
- School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Catherine Donnelly
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kadija Perreault
- Department of Rehabilitation, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Julie Richardson
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Wojkowski
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jordan Miller
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Magel J(J, Cochran G, West N, Fritz JM, Bishop MD, Gordon AJ. Physical therapists' attitudes are associated with their confidence in and the frequency with which they engage in prescription opioid medication misuse management practices with their patients. A cross-sectional study. Subst Abus 2022; 43:433-441. [PMID: 34283690 PMCID: PMC8770682 DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1944959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Background: In the US, prescription opioid medication misuse (POMM) necessitates engagement of physical therapists (PTs). We (1) evaluated the attitudes of (PT) related to their management of patients with POMM and (2) examined the association between these attitudes and PTs confidence in POMM-related management abilities and the frequency with which they engaged in POMM-related management practices. Methods: We conducted a national survey of PTs that included a modified Drug and Drug Problems Perception Questionnaire (DDPPQ). Confidence in POMM-related abilities and the frequency of engaging in POMM-related management practices were measured. Logistic regression evaluated the association between the DDPPQ subscales (role adequacy, role legitimacy, role self-esteem, role support, job satisfaction) and confidence and frequency outcomes. Results: The analysis included 402 respondents. Role adequacy and legitimacy subscales were associated with confidence and frequency outcomes (p<.05), indicating that more favorable role adequacy and legitimacy attitudes are associated with greater odds of having more confidence in POMM-related management abilities and of engaging in more frequent POMM-related management practices. Conclusions: PTs with a greater sense of preparedness to engage in POMM-related management were more likely to report greater confidence in POMM-related management abilities and engage in POMM-related management practices with greater frequency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John (Jake) Magel
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Gerald Cochran
- Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge and Advocacy (PARCKA) and Greater Intermountain Node (GIN) of the NIDA Clinical Trials Network, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA,Informatics, Decision–Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Nancy West
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Julie M. Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Mark D. Bishop
- Department of Physical Therapy, Center for Pain Research, Behavioral Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Adam J. Gordon
- Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge and Advocacy (PARCKA) and Greater Intermountain Node (GIN) of the NIDA Clinical Trials Network, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA,Informatics, Decision–Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lafrance S, Demont A, Thavorn K, Fernandes J, Santaguida C, Desmeules F. Economic evaluation of advanced practice physiotherapy models of care: a systematic review with meta-analyses. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1214. [PMID: 34753487 PMCID: PMC8579553 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07221-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The objective of this systematic review is to appraise evidence on the economic evaluations of advanced practice physiotherapy (APP) care compared to usual medical care. Methods Systematic searches were conducted up to September 2021 in selected electronic bibliographical databases. Economic evaluation studies on an APP model of care were included. Economic data such as health care costs, patient costs, productivity losses were extracted. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed with the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Meta-analyses were performed and mean differences (MD) in costs per patient were calculated using random-effect inverse variance models. Certainty of the evidence was assessed with the GRADE Approach. Results Twelve studies (n = 14,649 participants) including four randomized controlled trials, seven analytical cohort studies and one economic modeling study were included. The clinical settings of APP models of care included primary, emergency and specialized secondary care such as orthopaedics, paediatrics and gynaecology. The majority of the included participants were adults with musculoskeletal disorders (n = 12,915). Based on low quality evidence, health system costs including salaries, diagnostic tests, medications, and follow-up visits were significantly lower with APP care than with usual medical care, at 2 to 12-month follow-up (MD: -139.08 €/patient; 95%CI: -265.93 to -12.23; n = 7648). Based on low quality evidence, patient costs including travel and paid medication prescriptions, or treatments were significantly higher with APP care compared to usual medical care, at 2 to 6-month follow-up (MD: 29.24 €/patient; 95%CI: 0.53 to 57.95 n = 1485). Based on very low quality evidence, no significant differences in productivity losses per patient were reported between both types of care (MD: 590 €/patient; 95%CI: -100 to 1280; n = 819). Conclusions This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis on the economic evaluation of APP models of care. Low quality evidence suggests that APP care might result in lower health care costs, but higher patient costs compared to usual medical care. Costs differences may vary depending on various factors such as the cost methodology used and on the clinical setting. More evidence is needed to evaluate cost benefits of APP models of care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07221-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Lafrance
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. .,Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Université de Montréal Affiliated Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Anthony Demont
- INSERM 1123 ECEVE, Faculty of Medicine, Paris-Diderot University, Paris, France.,Physiotherapy School, University of Orleans, Orleans, France
| | - Kednapa Thavorn
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Julio Fernandes
- Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal Research Center, Université de Montréal Affiliated Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Carlo Santaguida
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medecine, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - François Desmeules
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Université de Montréal Affiliated Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Di Gangi S, Bagnoud C, Pichierri G, Rosemann T, Plate A. Treatment Patterns in Patients with Diagnostic Imaging for Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Observational Study. J Pain Res 2021; 14:3109-3120. [PMID: 34675640 PMCID: PMC8504656 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s328033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most frequent reasons for medical consultations. Literature suggests a large evidence-performance gap, especially regarding pain management. Therefore, the monitoring of treatment patterns is important to ensure high quality of treatment. This study aimed to describe treatment patterns specific to patients with diagnostic imaging of the spine for LBP. Patients and Methods The study was retrospective observational and based on health claims data from 2015 to 2019 provided by a Swiss health insurance company covering around 12% of the population. Patients, ≥18 years of age, with diagnostic imaging of the spine were included and observed 12 months before and after imaging. Patients with back surgery or comorbidities associated with the use of pain medications were excluded. Results In total, 60,822 patients (mean age: 53.5 y, 56.1% female) were included and 85% received at least one pain medication. Of these, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, paracetamol, or opioids were prescribed in 88.6%, 70.7%, and 40.3% of patients, respectively. Strong opioids were used in 17% of patients given opioids. Patients with combinations of diagnostic imaging methods had the highest odds of receiving pain medication prescriptions (1.81, 95% CI: 1.66, 1.96, P < 0.001). Prescribed defined daily doses corresponded to short-term therapies. Conclusion Although the majority of patients received non-opioid short-term therapies, we found a substantial use of opioids, and in particular, a relative high usage of strong opioids. Our results highlighted the importance of both patient and healthcare provider awareness regarding the prudent treatment of LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Di Gangi
- Institute of Primary Care, University and University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Giuseppe Pichierri
- Institute of Primary Care, University and University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Rosemann
- Institute of Primary Care, University and University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Plate
- Institute of Primary Care, University and University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Magel J, Kietrys D, Kruger ES, Fritz JM, Gordon AJ. Physical therapists should play a greater role in managing patients with opioid use and opioid misuse. Subst Abus 2021; 42:255-260. [PMID: 34524070 DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1971818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The U.S. opioid crisis necessitates that health care providers of all types work collaboratively to manage patients taking prescription opioid medications and manage those who may be misusing prescription opioids. Musculoskeletal conditions are the most common diagnoses associated with an opioid prescription. Physical therapists commonly manage patients with musculoskeletal conditions and chronic pain. Some patients who attend physical therapy for pain management take prescription opioid medications for pain and some of these patients may be misusing prescription opioids. Physical therapists who manage patients with musculoskeletal conditions are well-positioned to help address the opioid crisis. Historically, physical therapists have not been adequately engaged in efforts to manage persons with co-occurring musculoskeletal pain and opioid misuse or OUD. The American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) has emphasized physical therapy over the use of prescription opioids for the management of painful conditions. The APTA, however, does not highlight the important role that physical therapists could play in monitoring opioid use among patients receiving treatment for pain, nor the role that physical therapists should play in screening for opioid misuse. Such screening could facilitate referral of patients suspected misuse to an appropriate provider for formal assessment and treatment. This commentary presents simulated musculoskeletal patient presentations depicting 2 common opioid use states; chronic opioid use and opioid misuse. The cases highlight and interactions that physical therapists could have with these patients and actions that the physical therapist could take when working inter-disciplinarily. Recommendations are provided that aim to increase physical therapists' knowledge and skills related to managing patients taking prescription opioid medications for pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Magel
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - David Kietrys
- Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Sciences, Rutgers School of Health Professions, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Eric S Kruger
- School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabiliation, Division of Physical Therapy, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Julie M Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Adam J Gordon
- Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Anderson BR, McClellan WS, Long CR. Risk of Treatment Escalation in Recipients vs Nonrecipients of Spinal Manipulation for Musculoskeletal Cervical Spine Disorders: An Analysis of Insurance Claims. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2021; 44:372-377. [PMID: 34366149 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between treatment escalation and spinal manipulation in a retrospective cohort of people diagnosed with musculoskeletal disorders of the cervical spine. METHODS We used retrospective analysis of insurance claims data (2012-2018) from a single Fortune 500 company. After isolating the first episode of care, we categorized 58 147 claims into 7951 unique patient episodes. Treatment escalation included claims where imaging, injection, emergency room, or surgery was present. Modified Poisson regression was used to determine the relative risk of treatment escalation comparing recipients vs nonrecipients of spinal manipulation, adjusted for age, sex, episode duration, and risk scores. RESULTS The sample was 55% women, with a mean age of 44 years (range, 18-103). Treatment escalation was present in 42% of episodes overall: 2448 (46%) associated with other care and 876 (26%) associated with spinal manipulation. The estimated risk of any treatment escalation was 2.38 times higher in those who received other care than in those who received spinal manipulation (95% confidence interval, 2.22-2.55, P = .001). CONCLUSION Among episodes of care associated with neck pain diagnoses, those associated with other care had twice the risk of any treatment escalation compared with those associated with spinal manipulation. In the United States, over 90% of spinal manipulation is provided by doctors of chiropractic; therefore, these findings are relevant and should be considered in addressing solutions for neck pain. Additional research investigating the factors influencing treatment escalation is necessary to moderate the use of high-cost and guideline-incongruent procedures in people with neck pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian R Anderson
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa.
| | | | - Cynthia R Long
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
George SZ, Lentz TA, Goertz CM. Back and neck pain: in support of routine delivery of non-pharmacologic treatments as a way to improve individual and population health. Transl Res 2021; 234:129-140. [PMID: 33901699 PMCID: PMC8340679 DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Chronic back and neck pain are highly prevalent conditions that are among the largest drivers of physical disability and cost in the world. Recent clinical practice guidelines recommend use of non-pharmacologic treatments to decrease pain and improve physical function for individuals with back and neck pain. However, delivery of these treatments remains a challenge because common care delivery models for back and neck pain incentivize treatments that are not in the best interests of patients, the overall health system, or society. This narrative review focuses on the need to increase use of non-pharmacologic treatment as part of routine care for back and neck pain. First, we present the evidence base and summarize recommendations from clinical practice guidelines regarding non-pharmacologic treatments. Second, we characterize current use patterns for non-pharmacologic treatments and identify potential barriers to their delivery. Addressing these barriers will require coordinated efforts from multiple stakeholders to prioritize evidence-based non-pharmacologic treatment approaches over low value care for back and neck pain. These stakeholders include patients, health care providers, health care organizations, administrators, payers, policymakers and researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Z George
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Trevor A Lentz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Christine M Goertz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Brown-Taylor L, Beckner A, Scaff KE, Fritz JM, Buys MJ, Patel S, Bayless K, Brooke BS. Relationships between physical therapy intervention and opioid use: A scoping review. PM R 2021; 14:837-854. [PMID: 34153178 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesize available evidence that has examined the relationship between physical therapy (PT) and opioid use. TYPE: Scoping Review LITERATURE SURVEY: Data sources including Google Scholar, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched for English articles up to October 24, 2019 using terms ("physical therapy"[Title/Abstract] OR physiotherapy[Title/Abstract] OR rehabilitation[Title/Abstract]) AND (opiate*[Title/Abstract] OR opioid*[Title/Abstract]). METHODOLOGY Included studies evaluated a PT intervention and reported an opioid-use outcome. Data were extracted to describe the PT intervention, patient sample, opioid-use measurement, and results of any time or group comparisons. Study quality was evaluated with Joanna Briggs checklists based on study design. SYNTHESIS Thirty studies were included that evaluated PT in at least one of these seven categories: interdisciplinary program (n = 8), modalities (n = 3), treatment (n = 3), utilization (n = 2), content (n = 3), timing (n = 13), and location (n = 2). Mixed results were reported for reduced opioid-use after interdisciplinary care and after PT modalities. Utilizing PT was associated with lower odds (ranging from 0.2-0.8) of using opioid medication for persons with low back pain (LBP) and injured workers; however, guideline-adherent care did not further reduce opioid use for persons with LBP. Early PT utilization after index visit for spine or joint pain and after orthopedic surgery was also associated with lower odds of using opioid medications (ranging from 0.27-0.93). Emergency department PT care was not associated with fewer opioid prescriptions than standard emergency department care. PT in a rehabilitation center after total knee replacement was not associated with lower opioid use than inpatient PT. CONCLUSIONS The relationship between timing of PT and opioid use was evaluated in 13 of 30 studies for a variety of patient populations. Eight of these 13 studies reported a relationship between early PT and reduced subsequent opioid use, making the largest sample of studies in this scoping review with supporting evidence. There is limited and inconclusive evidence to establish whether the content and/or location of PT interventions improves outcomes because of heterogeneity between studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Brown-Taylor
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center of Innovation, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Medpace Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Aaron Beckner
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center of Innovation, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Katie E Scaff
- Jonathan M. Wainwright Memorial VA Medical Center, Walla Walla, Washington, USA
| | - Julie M Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Michael J Buys
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Shardool Patel
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center of Innovation, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kim Bayless
- Department of Anesthesiology, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Benjamin S Brooke
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center of Innovation, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sharpe JA, Martin BI, Fritz JM, Newman MG, Magel J, Vanneman ME, Thackeray A. Identifying patients who access musculoskeletal physical therapy: a retrospective cohort analysis. Fam Pract 2021; 38:203-209. [PMID: 33043360 PMCID: PMC8679185 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal conditions are common and cause high levels of disability and costs. Physical therapy is recommended for many musculoskeletal conditions. Past research suggests that referral rates appear to have increased over time, but the rate of accessing a physical therapist appears unchanged. OBJECTIVE Our retrospective cohort study describes the rate of physical therapy use after referral for a variety of musculoskeletal diagnoses while comparing users and non-users of physical therapy services after referral. METHODS The study sample included patients in the University of Utah Health system who received care from a medical provider for a musculoskeletal condition. We included a comprehensive set of variables available in the electronic data warehouse possibly associated with attending physical therapy. Our primary analysis compared differences in patient factors between physical therapy users and non-users using Poisson regression. RESULTS 15 877 (16%) patients had a referral to physical therapy, and 3812 (24%) of these patients accessed physical therapy after referral. Most of the factors included in the model were associated with physical therapy use except for sex and number of comorbidities. The receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.63 suggesting poor predictability of the model but it is likely related to the heterogeneity of the sample. CONCLUSIONS We found that obesity, ethnicity, public insurance and urgent care referrals were associated with poor adherence to physical therapy referral. However, the limited predictive power of our model suggests a need for a deeper examination into factors that influence patients access to a physical therapist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason A Sharpe
- University of Utah, Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training
| | - Brook I Martin
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics.,University of Utah, Department of Population Health Sciences, Division of Health System Innovation and Research
| | - Julie M Fritz
- University of Utah, Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training
| | - Michael G Newman
- Data Science Services, University of Utah, Data Science Services
| | - John Magel
- University of Utah, Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training
| | - Megan E Vanneman
- University of Utah, Department of Population Health Sciences, Division of Health System Innovation and Research.,University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Epidemiology.,Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences Center (IDEAS), Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences Center (IDEAS), Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Anne Thackeray
- University of Utah, Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training.,University of Utah, Department of Population Health Sciences, Division of Health System Innovation and Research
| |
Collapse
|