Instructing to Impact: Exploration of Doctor of Physical Therapy Education Instruction of Social Determinants of Health and Health Equity for People with Disabilities

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore instruction of social determinants of health (SDOH) for people with disabilities (PWD) in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) education programs.

METHODS

A sequential mixed methods study informed by a 5-member disability community advisory panel was conducted. Qualitative semi-structured interviews with educators (n = 10) across 4 DPT programs in the Midwest were conducted and analyzed thematically. The qualitative findings formed the basis of the quantitative phase. An online survey was conducted with faculty of DPT programs in the United States (n = 254) with the most knowledge of instruction of SDOH and health equity for PWD (n = 74; 29% response rate). Quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and triangulated with qualitative data.

RESULTS

SDOH for PWD is an emerging component of instruction in DPT curricula. Five themes included: emerging instruction of SDOH for PWD; conceptual frameworks informing instruction; instructional strategies; barriers to integration of SDOH for PWD; and facilitators to integration of SDOH for PWD. Quantitative analysis revealed that 71 respondents (95.9%) included disability in health equity discussions primarily focused on health care access. Limited time (n = 49; 66.2%) was the most frequently reported barrier, and educator interest in disability health equity was the most frequently reported facilitator (n = 62; 83.7%) to inclusion of the SDOH for PWD in health equity discussions.

CONCLUSION

Opportunities exist in DPT curricula to build on instructional strategies, integrate SDOH frameworks, and amplify facilitators to integration of SDOH for PWD.

IMPACT

To meet the needs of the 67 million Americans living with disabilities, students must have the knowledge and skills to address the complex needs of this historically marginalized population. Understanding the DPT education landscape around SDOH for PWD can guide DPT educators to more fully prepare their students to recognize and ameliorate health disparities faced by PWD.

Simulation-Based Education in Physical Therapist Education: A Survey of Current Practice

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to describe the current use of (1) simulation in student physical therapist professional education programs and (2) standards of best practice (SOBP) for simulation-based education (SBE) in physical therapist education.

METHODS

Two surveys were created about current use of SBE in student physical therapist professional education programs in the United States. The first survey contained questions about the program, including the best contact person regarding simulation. The second survey investigated simulation use within the context of SOBP. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Survey 1 was sent to the program director at all fully accredited physical therapist programs (N = 236), and 143 responses were returned (61% response rate). Survey 2 was sent to the 136 individuals identified in Survey 1, and we received 81 completed surveys (60%). Over 90% of programs reported including SBE in their curricula, with 86% providing 3 or more experiences. A median of 1 core faculty at each program reported training in SBE, but 23% reported no training. A lack of training in specific elements of the SOBP for SBE was reported by 40% to 50% of faculty. Limited use of SOBP was reported, and use of outcome measures without validation was common.

CONCLUSION

Although SBE is commonly used in physical therapist education, many faculties (1) do not have training in SBE, (2) do not consistently follow the SOBP, and (3) utilize unvalidated outcome measures. Limited faculty training in SBE and inconsistent inclusion of the SOBP suggest student learning in simulation is not optimized.

IMPACT

These results show that, despite increased use of simulation in physical therapist education programs, there is a dearth of faculty trained in SBE and inconsistent use of SOBP. Addressing these deficiencies could help to optimize the benefits of SBE in physical therapist education.

Simulation-Based Education in Physical Therapist Professional Education: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to (1) describe and summarize the use of simulation-based education (SBE) with student physical therapists in the international literature and (2) describe the application and integration of standards of best practice (SOBP) for SBE reported in published physical therapy education research.

METHODS

Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ERIC databases were searched. The search included any published study that involved the use of SBE with student physical therapists. Because this was a scoping review, only descriptive statistics were compiled; no methodological quality assessment was performed.

RESULTS

This scoping review revealed a significant increase in literature describing SBE with student physical therapists in the past 10 years. Simulation was used to address learning objectives across a variety of content areas and clinical settings. Communication skills were the most common objectives for simulation. Limited use of SOBP, published in 2016, was reported, and use of author-generated outcome measures without validation was common.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there has been an increase in literature reporting the use of SBE with student physical therapists across many practice areas and settings, many articles reported limited use and integration of published SOBP and frequently utilized outcome measures that had not been validated.

IMPACT

The findings show that limited use of validated outcome measures and SOBP constrain the capacity for reproducing studies, comparing findings among studies, and completing systematic reviews that could inform and optimize best practices for the use of SBE in physical therapist professional education. Further research on SBE in physical therapy would benefit from investigations that integrated and reported the use of SOBP for standardized patients, simulation design, and delivery and assessment of learning outcomes over time at multiple Kirkpatrick learning levels.

Simulation-Based Education in Physical Therapist Education: Perspectives From the Strategic Initiative Panel on Simulation in Physical Therapist Education

In the summer of 2018, The American Council of Academic Physical Therapy appointed 9 individuals versed in simulation education to form the Strategic Initiative Panel on Simulation to (1) investigate the use of simulation in physical therapist education, (2) explore the role of simulation in meeting accreditation standards and curriculum elements related to clinical education and interprofessional education, and (3) describe models and best practices for the use of simulation in physical therapist education. Over the 3 years of Strategic Initiative Panel on Simulation work, the panel identified several significant gaps in simulation education and research practice. This paper clarifies the essential elements required to optimize the delivery of simulation-based education in physical therapy following best practices, frames the existing challenges to move the profession forward, and recommends specific actions needed to address the many continued questions related to the effective use of simulation-based education in physical therapist education.

Doctor of Physical Therapy Education in a Hybrid Learning Environment: A Case Report

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this case report is to describe the implementation and report early outcomes of a 2-year (6-trimester), hybrid doctor of physical therapy (DPT) program.

METHODS

The case report describes management of (1) academic affairs, (2) student affairs, (3) faculty affairs, and (4) institutional affairs for an accredited, fully hybrid, 2-year DPT program. In the hybrid program, students from across the country participate in synchronous and asynchronous online learning and travel to campus twice per trimester for immersive blocks of in-person laboratory instruction. The case report describes how the program structures the hybrid learning environment and reports outcomes from the first 2 graduated cohorts.

RESULTS

Program outcomes assessment revealed that 97% to 98% of students/graduates reported being somewhat or very satisfied with the 2-year hybrid DPT program at the end of DPT year 1, at graduation, and at 1 year after graduation. Clinical instructors reported that 84% of students were prepared or well-prepared for clinical education. At 1 year after graduation, 20% of graduates were enrolled in or had completed residency, National Physical Therapy Examination (NPTE) pass rate was 97%, and employment rate was 99%.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid DPT education is feasible and may provide opportunities for more flexible and accessible delivery of DPT education. Outcomes of this case report suggest high student satisfaction, increased student/graduate diversity, and graduate outcomes comparable with national averages as reported in the Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education aggregate data.

IMPACT

This case report provides early evidence that hybrid DPT education-a type of blended learning that uses both face-to-face and online instructional strategies-is feasible, with student satisfaction and student/graduate outcomes comparable with national averages. Hybrid education may provide educators, programs, and institutions the flexibility to innovate in ways that address some of the immediate and long-term challenges facing physical therapist professional education while maintaining standards of excellence.

Clinical Teaching Competencies in Physical Therapist Education: A Modified Delphi Study

OBJECTIVE

Clinical instructors play a key role in physical therapist professional education but may serve with minimal preparation and without clearly defined expectations for their teaching performance. The objective of this study was to utilize a consensus-building process to establish core competencies of clinical teaching within physical therapist education.

METHODS

A modified Delphi approach was used to identify core competencies of clinical teaching. An expert panel consisted of clinical instructors, site coordinators of clinical education, and directors of clinical education, representing multiple geographic regions in the United States. The panel assessed the relevance of 30 original competencies. Criteria for consensus included 75% of participants perceiving the competency as very or extremely relevant and a median score of 2 (very relevant) on a 5-point Likert scale. Consistent with a Modified Delphi approach, quantitative and qualitative data analysis were completed for each of the 3 rounds. Revised surveys were used in Rounds 2 and 3 based on the results from previous data analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-four competencies achieved final consensus. The competencies were categorized within 3 domains: learner-centered educator (n = 8), assessor/evaluator (n = 7), and professional role model (n = 9).

CONCLUSION

The 24 competencies and 3 domains provide the foundation for a competency framework for clinical teaching in physical therapy. This framework provides clarity for the expected knowledge, skills, and attitudes of clinical instructors in physical therapist professional education.

IMPACT

This is the first study, to our knowledge, to utilize a consensus-building strategy to clearly define competencies of clinical teaching in physical therapist professional education. Like efforts in nursing and medical education, adoption of these competencies could promote consistency in clinical instructor teaching behaviors and contribute to the creation of assessment and professional development mechanisms for clinical instructors, positively impacting the preparation of the next generation of excellent physical therapist clinicians.

Physical Therapist and Physical Therapist Student Knowledge, Confidence, Attitudes, and Beliefs About Providing Care for People With Dementia: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine physical therapists' and physical therapist students' attitudes and beliefs, knowledge, and confidence in working with people with dementia.

METHODS

This was a mixed-methods systematic review. Participants included physical therapists working in any clinical specialty and physical therapist students who had completed at least 1 clinical placement. Eleven databases were searched. The evidence was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists. Data synthesis followed a convergent integrated approach according to Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for mixed-methods systematic reviews. Quantitative data were "qualitized" using thematic analysis and synthesized with qualitative data using thematic synthesis.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included (9 quantitative and 6 qualitative studies). Seven key themes evolved. Five related to the belief that (1) working with people with dementia is complex and challenging; (2) opportunities for education in dementia care are lacking; (3) working with people with dementia is a specialized area of practice; (4) there are unsupportive systems for working with people with dementia; and (5) people with dementia deserve rehabilitation, but their potential to improve is less certain. One theme related to knowledge (lack of knowledge in some areas of dementia care), and 1 theme related to confidence (lack of confidence in working with people with dementia).

CONCLUSIONS

Physical therapists and physical therapist students believe that working with people with dementia can be challenging. The low levels of knowledge and confidence in areas important to working with people who have dementia suggest that more education about dementia is needed.

IMPACT

This mixed-methods systematic review highlights that physical therapists and physical therapist students believe that working with people who have dementia is complex and challenging. Physical therapists want more training and support in this growing area of practice.

What I Know: The Value of Mentoring and Leadership

Stuart Binder-Macleod, PT, PhD, FAPTA, the 51st Mary McMillan lecturer, is the Edward L. Ratledge Professor of Physical Therapy and associate vice president for clinical and translation research at the University of Delaware (UD). He served as the chair of UD's department of physical therapy for 16 years, and his research laboratory had more than 25 years of continuous National Institutes of Health funding, including major funding for projects involving the development and testing of treatment interventions for individuals demonstrating poststroke hemiparesis. A recipient of multiple honors from the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) and its components, Binder-Macleod also served on the task force that created the American Council of Academic Physical Therapy, and he currently serves on the Board of Trustees of the Foundation for Physical Therapy Research.

Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the health of people from communities of color and people of limited socioeconomic means in a disproportionate way due to social determinants of health (SDoH). The Centers for Disease Control defines SDoH as the "conditions in the places where people live, learn, work, and play that affect a wide range of health and quality-of life-risks and outcomes." A related construct, social determinants of learning (SDoL), includes contextual conditions and variables that impact students' ability to optimally participate in their education, including academic and clinical development. SDoL directly impact students' ability to participate in the educational process. During the COVID-19 pandemic, students struggling with SDoH and, by extension SDoL, may be more likely to have sick family members, caregiving responsibilities, food and housing insecurity, and obligations to supplement lost family wages. SDoL are also influenced by individual experiences within and outside of the classroom. Beyond bringing this matter to the attention of our profession, especially clinical and academic educators, we must take action to reach and support students who are at higher academic risk due to the SDoL. The purpose of this paper is to (1) define SDoL, (2) explain how SDoL are impacting doctor of physical therapy and physical therapist assistant students, and (3) discuss actions that physical therapists and physical therapist assistants can take to mitigate the effects of SDoL on current doctor of physical therapy and physical therapist assistant students.

IMPACT

This Perspective is one of the first explorations of how SDoL affect physical therapy students during the pandemic and provides concrete suggestions on how educators in both academic and clinical settings can help students succeed when they are negatively affected by SDoL.

Work Readiness of New Graduate Physical Therapists for Private Practice in Australia: Academic Faculty, Employer, and Graduate Perspectives

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to explore academic faculty, employer, and recent graduate perspectives of the work readiness of Australian new graduate physical therapists for private practice and factors that influence new graduate preparation and transition to private practice.

METHODS

This study used a mixed-methods design with 3 surveys and 12 focus groups. A total of 112 participants completed a survey, and 52 participated in focus groups. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the quantitative data, and thematic analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data. Triangulation across participant groups and data sources was undertaken.

RESULTS

Australian new graduate physical therapists were perceived to be "somewhat ready" for private practice and "ready" by their third year of employment. Participants proposed that new graduates bring enthusiasm, readiness to learn, and contemporary, research-informed knowledge. New graduates were also perceived to find autonomous clinical reasoning and timely caseload management difficult; to have limited business, marketing, and administration knowledge and skills; and to present with underdeveloped confidence, communication, and interpersonal skills. Factors perceived to influence graduate transition included private practice experience, such as clinical placements and employment; employer and client expectations of graduate capabilities; workplace support; university academic preparation and continuing education; and individual graduate attributes and skills.

CONCLUSION

Australian new graduate physical therapists have strengths and limitations in relation to clinical, business, and employability knowledge and skills. New graduate work readiness and transition may be enhanced by additional private practice experience, employer and client expectation management, provision of workplace support, and tailored university and continuing education.

IMPACT

The number of new graduate physical therapists employed in private practice in Australia is increasing; however, until this study, their work readiness for this setting was unknown. This exploration of new graduate performance in private practice and transition can help to increase understanding and enhancement of work-readiness.

eLearning in Physical Therapy: Lessons Learned From Transitioning a Professional Education Program to Full eLearning During the COVID-19 Pandemic

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this cross-sectional qualitative study were to explore the perspectives of students enrolled in one physical therapist undergraduate education program in Australia about their experience with transitioning to full eLearning and student recommendations to improve the learning experience during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Seven focus groups with 28 undergraduate physical therapist students were conducted following the transitioning to full eLearning as a result of strict physical distancing measures. Focus group questions explored the students' experiences of the transition from face-to-face to full eLearning approach and the students' recommendations for improving future eLearning experiences. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The 3 themes identified were: (1) students presenting heightened negative feelings such as anxiety, stress, and reduced motivation to study; (2) students continuing to value the face-to-face learning, as it provided social support and facilitated feedback from peers and tutors; (3) student recommendations for eLearning included having online lectures and supplementary videos but face-to-face practical classes and developing healthy learning habits such as scheduled times for studying, exercise, and other activities that regulate stress.

CONCLUSIONS

The transition to a full eLearning approach in an undergraduate physical therapist education program during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed that students had heightened negative emotions due to the pandemic. Students valued face-to-face practical classes to learn and receive social support from peers and tutors. Student recommendations to future eLearning suggested changes to curriculum development geared toward a greater blended approach to learning. Blended learning may include using online lectures instead of face-to-face lectures and online resources to supplement student learning of practical skills.

IMPACT

As higher education moves toward a more blended approach, lessons learned from this study can help educators design future physical therapist education programs. The findings can also assist programs in delivering a full eLearning approach as the COVID-19 pandemic continues.

Benefits and Harms of Short-Term International Academic Experiences Among Rehabilitation Students: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

More rehabilitation students are engaging in short-term international experiences to gain clinical experience with a novel population or setting. Further investigation of the impacts on the students and host populations resulting from these initiatives is needed. The purpose of this study was to examine the benefits and harms of short-term international academic experiences completed by rehabilitation students for both the student and the host populations.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL were searched for studies from 1998 through March 2019; any study design was eligible for review. Independent reviewers screened and selected studies. To be eligible, articles had to include a rehabilitation student participating in a short-term clinical or community-based experience. Two independent reviewers extracted data from included studies. Outcomes included benefits and harms of international academic experiences on students and host populations. Oxford Level of Evidence was used for quality assessment. Nineteen studies met eligibility criteria.

RESULTS

The most prevalent benefits and harms to students were increases in cultural and clinical competence and emotional health risks. The most prevalent benefits and harms to hosts were novel training and decreased productivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Highlighting benefits and harms serves a pivotal role in investigating ways to create more effective, mutually beneficial relationships between home and host populations. Future research should aim for a deeper analysis of the impact of short-term international academic experiences on host populations to develop and deepen sustainable partnerships.

IMPACT

With more rehabilitation students engaging in short-term international academic experiences, this review provides important guidance for the profession, including the recommendation that outcomes regarding the potential benefits and harms for home and host populations should be collected at 3 key times: immediately pre-departure for the host country, immediately post-departure in the home country, and 1-year post-arrival in the home country.