Incidence and outcomes of aortic dissection for emergency departments in New South Wales, Australia 2017–2018: A data linkage study

Weekend Effect and Mortality Outcomes in Aortic Dissection: A Prospective Analysis

Background

Aortic dissection (AD) is a critical heart condition with potentially severe outcomes. Our study aimed to investigate the existence of a "weekend effect" in AD by examining the correlation between patient outcomes and whether their treatment occurred on weekdays versus weekends.

Methods

Specifically, we prospectively analysed the effect of weekday and weekend treatment on acute AD patient outcomes, both before surgical intervention and during hospitalization, for 124 patients treated from 2019-2021, as well as during 6 months of follow-up.

Results

The mean age of the study population was 62.5 years, and patient age exhibited a high degree of variability. We recorded a mortality rate before surgery of 8.65% for the weekend group and 15% for the weekday group, but this difference was not statistically significant. During hospitalization, mortality was 50% in the weekend group and 25% in the weekday group, but this difference was not statistically significant. Discharge mortality was 9.61% in the weekend group and 5% in the weekday group.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that there was no significant difference in mortality rates between patients admitted to the hospital on weekends versus weekdays. Therefore, the period of the week when a patient presents to the hospital with AD appears not to affect their mortality.

What can be done to improve diagnosis of aortic dissection?

Aortic dissection (AD) is rare. Missed AD is a common reason for coronial investigations and civil claims for medical negligence. Recommendations include improved education, supervision and information transfer, reminders in chest pain pathways and higher rates of investigation for AD. Higher investigation rates pose risks to patients and the health system which may not be in balance with the likelihood of AD. The appropriate diagnostic yield of investigation to balance risk and benefit has not been defined. The AD detection risk score pathway has been proposed as a useful diagnostic tool but concerns about its derivation, validation and utility remain. In this paper, we try to draw together published literature and local audit data to develop recommendations about what might be done to reduce the number of missed AD cases in EDs and what the impact of higher investigation rates might be.

Epidemiology, mortality and miss rate of acute aortic syndrome in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study

INTRODUCTION

Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is a life-threatening emergency. It describes three distinct diagnoses: acute aortic dissection, acute intramural hematoma and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer. There are currently no accurate estimates for incidence, mortality or misdiagnosis. Our objectives were to determine the incidence, mortality and miss rate of acute aortic syndrome in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

A population-based retrospective cohort study of anonymously linked data for residents of Ontario, Canada, was carried out. Incident cases of acute aortic syndrome were identified between 2003 and 2018 using a validated algorithm based on ICD-10 codes and death. Incidence (number of cases/population of Ontario), mortality, and miss rate were calculated. Miss rate was defined as when a patient was seen in the ED within 14 days prior to an acute aortic syndrome diagnosis with a presenting complaint consistent with acute aortic syndrome.

RESULTS

There were 1299 cases of acute aortic syndrome over the study period [age mean (SD) 68.03 ± 14.70; female (n = 500, 38.5%); rural areas (n = 111, 8.6%)]. The overall annual incidence for acute aortic syndrome was 0.61 per 100,000. One year mortality decreased from 47.4 to 29.1%. ED mortality was 14.9%. In the 14 days prior to diagnosis 12.5% of patients were seen in the ED with a presentation consistent with acute aortic syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Annual incidence of acute aortic syndrome was found to be lower than other population-based studies. Also, the burden of mortality is seen in the ED. Education initiatives should focus on the identification of acute aortic syndrome in the ED to address mortality and miss rate.

Trends in computed tomography aortography and acute aortic syndrome in an emergency department within Aotearoa New Zealand

OBJECTIVE

Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) comprises a triad of life-threatening aortic conditions that are difficult to diagnose because of their non-specific clinical presentations. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography aortography (CTA) has a high sensitivity and specificity for these conditions. However, under- and over-investigation of patients with suspected AAS using CTA carries significant risk. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic imaging practices of CTA use for patients presenting to an ED with suspected AAS.

METHODS

All atraumatic thoracic CTAs performed on patients aged ≥15 years old with suspected AAS who presented to Auckland City Hospital between 2009 and 2019 were included. Outcomes of interest were the annual ED and population incidences of AAS, and the rate of CTAs performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1646 CTAs were included. There were 135 (8.2%) cases of at least one AAS diagnosis and 220 (13.4%) cases where an alternative diagnosis was made. The population-adjusted number of AAS diagnoses remained relatively stable over the study period, with a mean annual AAS incidence of 19.6 (95% confidence interval 9.9-33.7) per 100 000 patients, and 3.2 (95% confidence interval 1.6-5.4) per 100 000 population. The number of ED presentations increased during the study period, along with the population-adjusted rate of CTAs performed, from approximately 150 per 100 000 patients (2009) to 350 per 100 000 patients (2019).

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic CTA use for investigating suspected AAS in our ED has recently increased. However, the annual incidence of AAS did not increase over the same period, but was higher than reported in overseas institutions.

Characteristics, clinical findings and outcomes of acute aortic dissection: A comparison between an Australian emergency department and the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection

OBJECTIVES

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a rare, life-threatening condition for which the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) remains the most detailed clinical resource. The present study compared the characteristics, clinical findings and outcomes of patients presenting to Liverpool Hospital, NSW, Australia (LPOOL) with AAD to those in IRAD. Secondary aims were to identify LPOOL patient variables associated with 30-day mortality and to assess the impact of transfer times in the ED on 30-day mortality.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study of patients presenting to LPOOL with AAD between 2011 and 2019. Clinical records were examined and compared with IRAD data. Variables in LPOOL associated (P < 0.10) with 30-day mortality by univariable analysis were subsequently entered in a multivariable logistic regression to identify independent predictors. Mediation analysis was performed to assess the impact of ED transfer times on 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

The characteristics, clinical findings and outcomes of 156 LPOOL patients were overall similar to those in IRAD. Syncope, weakness or paralysis, raised lactate and chest X-ray abnormalities were identified as independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Time from ED to ICU explained 28% of the variance in survival at 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The characteristics, clinical features and outcomes of patients with AAD presenting to LPOOL appeared similar to those reported by IRAD. The identification of independent mortality predictors serves to improve the understanding of local AAD presentations. Reducing ED to ICU transfer times may increase 30-day survival and further interdisciplinary research should be considered.

Incidence and Survival of Aortic Dissection in Urban China: Results from the National Insurance Claims for Epidemiological Research (NICER) Study

Background

Aortic dissection (AD) represents a significant mortality; however, there is rare epidemiologic information about the demography of AD in Chinese, especially its incidence rate.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was established using the Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance claims data covering 346.7 million residents from 23 provinces in China, 2015-2016. AD cases were then linked to database of the Urban Employee Basic Endowment Insurance for death information. Incidence rate was age- and sex-standardized to the 2010 China census population. The associations between AD and related factors were evaluated with Poisson regression models. Moreover, mortality and sex- and age-adjusted survival rate was estimated by Cox models.

Findings

6084 adult AD cases were included in incidence analysis. Totally 4692(77.1%) were men and 5641(92.7%) were Han Chinese. The overall age- and sex-adjusted incidence rate of AD was 2.78(95%CI:2.59-2.98) per 100,000 person-years. In terms of geographic disparities, the crude incidence rate was significantly higher in Northwest China than South China (4.96[95%CI:4.17-5.75] vs. 2.04[95%CI:0.38-3.71] per 100,000 person-years; risk ratio: 2.67[95%CI: 2.34-3.04]). Moreover, survival analysis of 4518 AD patients with 683 recorded deaths during follow-up (median 2.2 years) showed that overall 3-year survival was 83.7%(95%CI:82.4-84.8).

Interpretation

This contemporary population-based cohort study provides a first comprehensive assessment of incidence of AD in urban Chinese adults. The distinct signatures of different incidence with respect to geographic variations may have important implications for clinical management of AD.

Funding

Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (2020YFC2003503, 2016YFC0903000), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (91846112, 81973132, 81961128006).

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Incidence of Acute Aortic Dissections in Population-Based Studies

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic-review and meta-analysis of all population-based studies reporting on incidence of acute aortic dissections.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Open Grey databases from inception to August 2020 for population-based studies reporting on the incidence of AAD. A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines using a registered protocol (CRD42020204007). Data was pooled using a random-effects model of proportions using Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. The main outcome was the incidence of AAD. Secondary outcomes were incidence type A aortic dissections (TAAD) and type B aortic dissections (TBAD); incidence of aortic dissection repair and medical management and incidence of in-hospital mortality. In addition, we estimated the proportion of aortic dissection repair and mortality (in hospital, overall and specific mortality according to sub-type) among patients with AAD.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were included. The pooled incidence of AADs was 4.8 per 100 000 individuals/year (95%CI: 3.6; 6.1). Incidence of TAAD was 3.0 per 100 000/year (95%CI: 1.8; 4.4) and incidence of TBAD was 1.6 per 100 000/year (95%CI: 1.1; 2.2). The incidence of AAD needing repair was 1.4 per 100 000/year (95%CI: 1.0; 2.0) [1.4 (95%CI: 1.2; 1.7) for TAAD and 0.4 (95%CI: 0.2; 0.7) for TBAD]. Incidence of medically managed AAD was 3.4 per 100 000/year (95%CI: 2.4; 4.5). Incidence of in-hospital death due to AAD was 1.3 per 100 000 individuals/year (95%CI: 0.9; 1.9); 1.0 (95%CI: 0.6; 1.4; I²97%) for TAAD and 0.3 for TBAD (95%CI: 0.2; 0.4; I²96%).

CONCLUSION

A global estimate regarding the incidence rate of acute aortic dissections was achieved. Incidence of acute aortic dissection varied significantly between study designs and geographical regions. More accurate information on acute aortic dissection epidemiology is crucial for public-health decisions, clinical understanding, and healthcare management.

Surgical Stabilisation of Traumatic Rib Fractures with Chronic, Residual Type A Aortic Dissection

Surgical stabilisation of rib fractures (SSRF) reduces morbidity and mortality. However, its impact in complicated cases, particularly those with underlying thoracic pathologies, is of continued interest. Electronic records were retrospectively reviewed after obtaining informed consent from the patient. This case report details a patient with chronic, residual, Stanford Type A aortic dissection (AD) who had multiple left-sided rib fractures with a flail segment after being struck by a bicycle. The preoperative computed tomography (CT) of the patient's chest showed that the sixth posterior rib fracture location was just ~13 mm from the false lumen of the aorta. As the patient had poor respiratory output and persistent pain, SSRF was not performed on the posterior sections. However, the anterior third to seventh rib fractures were plated. The patient recovered fully, with reduced pain and improved respiratory function. This is the first report describing the benefits of SSRF with AD or major thoracic pathologies. Further research into the benefits of SSRF in specific thoracic pathologies may lead to improved patient outcomes. This may require the creation of profiles of patient cohorts with relevant clinical history to determine if SSRF may benefit patients with specific thoracic pathologies.